Effect of quinapril on intimal hyperplasia after coronary stenting as assessed by intravascular ultrasound

Effect of Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors on soluble tumor-necrosis-factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand levels - association with neointimal hyperplasia in drug eluting stents

OBJECTIVE

To test the hypothesis that angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) affect soluble tumor-necrosis-factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (sTRAIL) and this interaction is associated with less in-drug-eluting-stent (DES) neointimal hyperplasia following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

METHODS

From our database of patients with elective PCI and baseline intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) evaluation of the implanted DES, we randomly selected 60 patients who were prescribed an ACEi and 60 matched controls, who did not receive an ACEi following PCI. All patients underwent coronary angiography and IVUS. sTRAIL was measured in samples from the stented coronary artery and a peripheral vein.

RESULTS

sTRAIL concentration was higher in the ACEi group, both in coronary and peripheral samples: 104 [78-139] pg/ml versus 63 [45-100] pg/ml (P < 0.001) and 99 [73-135] pg/ml versus 69 [49-103] pg/ml (P = 0.002), respectively. There was an inverse association (standardized beta -0.760; P < 0.001) between sTRAIL and lumen area loss in both treatment groups. In the multivariable analysis, log(sTRAIL) was an independent negative predictor of lumen area loss (standardized beta -0.660, adjusted 95% confidence interval -0.722 to -0.466).

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with ACEi was associated with higher sTRAIL levels and lower lumen area loss in the IVUS evaluation of implanted DES. sTRAIL levels were negatively associated with in-stent neointima hyperplasia in these post-PCI patients.

Measuring and targeting aldosterone and renin in atherosclerosis-a review of clinical data

Our understanding of the development and progression of atherosclerosis has increased substantially over the past decades. A significant role for the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) in this process has gained appreciation in recent years. Preclinical and clinical studies have associated components of the RAAS with various cardiovascular disease conditions. Classically known for its contribution to hypertension, dysregulation of the system is now also believed to promote vascular inflammation, fibrosis, remodeling, and endothelial dysfunction, all intimately related to atherosclerosis. The reduction in cardiovascular mortality and morbidity, as seen with the use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor blockers, supports the concept that RAAS is involved in the pathogenesis of atherosclerotic disease. However, the underlying molecular mechanisms of the pathophysiology remain to be completely understood. Evidence points toward additional benefit from therapeutic approaches aiming at more complete inhibition of the system and the possible utility of renin or aldosterone in the prediction of cardiovascular outcome. This review will summarize the current knowledge from clinical studies regarding the presumptive role of renin and aldosterone in the prediction and management of patients with atherosclerosis. For this purpose, a literature search was performed, focusing on available clinical data regarding renin or aldosterone and cardiovascular outcome.

Effect of quinapril on in-stent restenosis and relation to plasma apoptosis signaling molecules

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors have been reported to inhibit in-stent restenosis. To assess the effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition on in-stent restenosis and its relation to apoptosis, 86 patients with chronic coronary artery disease who required stent implantation in the left anterior descending coronary artery or a major diagonal branch were studied. Patients were randomized to receive quinapril 40 mg/day orally (n = 43) or a placebo (n = 43). Drug therapy was initiated 1 week before initial stenting and continued for 6 months. Plasma levels of the apoptotic signaling molecules soluble Fas and soluble Fas ligand obtained from blood drawn from the left anterior descending coronary artery were measured just before initial stenting and 6 months later, at the time of repeat coronary angiography. In-stent restenosis was present in 9.3% of patients in the quinapril group and 25.6% of patients in the placebo group (p = 0.047). Mean late luminal loss was 0.56 +/- 0.51 mm in the quinapril group and 0.95 +/- 0.95 mm in the placebo group (p = 0.003). There were no significant differences in plasma soluble Fas or soluble Fas ligand levels at baseline. At 6 months, the change in plasma soluble Fas level was significantly higher in the quinapril group (0.72 +/- 1.24 ng/ml) than in the placebo group (0.28 +/- 0.72 ng/ml) (p = 0.024). The change in plasma soluble Fas ligand levels at 6 months was significantly higher in the quinapril group (7.43 +/- 12.2 pg/ml) than in the placebo group (0.06 +/- 6.8 pg/ml) (p = 0.002). In conclusion, the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor quinapril inhibits in-stent restenosis by stimulating apoptosis after percutaneous intervention.

Quinaprilat: a review of its pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, toxicological data and clinical application

BACKGROUND

Quinaprilat is an ACE inhibitor for intravenous use especially in patients with arterial hypertension or chronic heart failure. In contrast to the oral prodrug quinapril, it has not been approved for clinical application.

OBJECTIVE

In this review, the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile of quinaprilat as well as toxicological data and results of preclinical and clinical studies are summarized.

METHODS

In a PubMed search for the terms "quinaprilat" and "quinapril", literature relevant for this review was selected.

RESULTS

Quinaprilat is a potent nonsulfhydryl selective ACE inhibitor with a short elimination half-life of 2 - 3 h, but due to slow dissociation from tissue ACE, once daily dosing is sufficient for effective ACE inhibition. Quinaprilat is excreted mainly in urine. In long-term animal studies, quinaprilat was not teratogenic, mutagenic or carcinogenic. However, due to the risk of fetal and neonatal morbidity and death, it should not be administrated in pregnancy. Quinaprilat is characterized by an excellent safety profile; adverse events occur infrequently and are rarely serious.

CONCLUSION

Quinaprilat is an attractive ACE inhibitor, which potently inhibits tissue ACE.

Pharmacogenomics of Renin Angiotensin System Inhibitors in Coronary Artery Disease

Renin Angiotensin System (RAS) inhibitors comprise some of the most commonly used medications in coronary artery disease (CAD) and its related syndromes. Unfortunately, significant inter-patient variability seems likely in response to these agents; of which, the influence of genetic determinants is of interest. This review summarizes the available RAS inhibitor pharmacogenomic studies which have evaluated RAS polymorphisms that either elucidate mechanism via surrogate endpoint measurements, or predict efficacy via clinical outcomes in CAD related syndromes.Regardless of the endpoint, none of the RAS genotypes conclusively predicts efficacy of RAS inhibitors. In fact, the results of the pharmacogenomic studies were often in direct conflict with one another. Varied results appear due to methodological limitations (e.g., inadequate study power, genotyping error, methods of endpoint measurement), study conceptualization (e.g., overestimating the contribution of polymorphism to disease, lack of haplotype approach), and differences between studies (e.g., genotype frequency, study subject characteristics, the specific medication and dose used). Thus investigators should consider the various methodological limitations to improve upon the current approach to RAS inhibitor pharmacogenomic research in the vast CAD population.

Effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or an angiotensin receptor blocker in combination with aspirin and cilostazol on in-stent restenosis

It remains to be determined whether adding an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) or an angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) to antiplatelet therapy has a therapeutic benefit on in-stent restenosis. After successful coronary stenting, 165 patients (167 lesions) were randomly assigned to a basal (aspirin 162 mg + cilostazol 200 mg/day), ACEI (basal treatment + quinapril 10 mg or perindopril 4 mg/day), or ARB (basal treatment + losartan 50 mg/day) treatment group. Quantitative coronary angiography was performed before, immediately following, and 6 months after stenting. Follow-up coronary angiography was completed in 126 patients (128 lesions). Restenosis rates tended to be higher (12, 26, and 12% for the basal, ACEI, and ARB groups, respectively), and target lesion revascularization rates were higher in the ACEI group than in the other groups (9, 23,* and 5%, respectively, *P < 0.05 versus basal group). Moreover, late lumen loss was higher in the ACEI group than in the basal group (0.60 +/- 0.55, 0.98 +/- 0.61* and 0.73 +/- 0.64 mm in the basal, ACEI, and ARB groups, respectively). The combinations of an ACEI or ARB with aspirin and cilostazol are ineffective for the prevention of in-stent restenosis, and an ACEI may even promote intimal proliferation after stent implantation.

Present status of outcome prediction of invasive coronary treatment by using genetic markers

A growing number of studies suggest that the outcome after invasive coronary treatment may be in part genetically determined. Here, we review the present status of outcome prediction of invasive coronary treatments by using genetic markers. Although some studies found an association between one or another genetic marker with one or another clinical endpoint, many other studies found no such relations; to date, none of the genetic markers that have been investigated in association studies are used in routine clinical practice to prospectively assess the prognosis following invasive coronary treatment or to decide upon therapeutic strategies. Many associations between genetic markers and certain clinical endpoints were initially reported in small studies but could not be confirmed in larger ones. Some of these discrepancies may be explained by publication bias. Some genetic variants may have true effects on clinical endpoints, which, albeit biologically interesting, do not bear much clinical relevance. On the other hand, many-if not most-studies that have been published to date are more or less grossly underpowered and very rarely report on the results of an a priori power analysis. Thus, there is still a need for further high-quality studies designed to investigate the specific contribution of genetic factors to the outcome after invasive coronary interventions.

Pre-procedural ACE-activity does not predict symptomatic in-stent restenosis

BACKGROUND

Several studies indicate that ACE-activity is related to atherosclerosis. We investigated the correlation between ACE-activity, in plasma as well as in the atherosclerotic plaque, and in-stent restenosis.

METHODS AND RESULTS

ACE-activity was measured in blood samples from 178 patients who underwent a percutaneous coronary intervention with stent placement. During 8 months follow-up, 51 of these patients had an adverse clinical event. ACE-activity did not differ between patients with or without adverse events (21.5 vs. 23.1 nM/ml/min; P=0.36). Tissue samples were obtained with an atherectomy catheter before elective stent placement in another group of 13 patients with de novo stenosis. In this tissue, we determined the ACE-content immunohistologically. These patients were scheduled for follow-up quantitative coronary angiography after 12 months. In this group, the quantity of ACE was not correlated to the late luminal loss (0.31 vs. 0.38 mm; P=0.76).

CONCLUSION

In this study, pre-procedural ACE-activity, in plasma as well as in the atherosclerotic plaque, does not predict the occurrence of in-stent restenosis.

Pharmacological treatment for prevention of restenosis

Coronary artery disease (CAD) is the leading cause of mortality and morbidity among adults in the Western world. Coronary artery bypass grafting and percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) have gained widespread acceptance for the treatment of symptomatic CAD. There has been an explosive growth worldwide in the utilisation of PCI, such as balloon angioplasty and stenting, which now accounts for over 50% of coronary revascularisation. Despite the popularity of PCI, the problem of recurrent narrowing of the dilated artery (restenosis) continues to vex investigators. In recent years, significant advances have occurred in the understanding of restenosis. Two processes seem to contribute to restenosis: remodelling (vessel size changes) and intimal hyperplasia (vascular smooth muscle cell [VSMC] proliferation and extracellular matrix [ECM] deposition). Despite considerable efforts, pharmacological approaches to decrease restenosis have been largely unsuccessful and the only currently applied modality to reduce the restenosis rate is stenting. However, stenting only prevents remodelling and does not inhibit intimal hyperplasia. Several potential targets for inhibiting restenosis are currently under investigation including platelet activation, the coagulation cascade, VSMC proliferation and migration, and ECM synthesis. In addition, new approaches for local drug therapy, such as drug eluting stents, are currently being evaluated in preclinical and clinical studies. In this article, we critically review the current status of drugs that are being evaluated for restenosis at various stages of development (in vitro, preclinical animal models and human trials).

Angiotensin Antagonism in Coronary Artery Disease

The renin-angiotensin system (RAS) is an ancient and complex cascade of homeostatic reactions aimed at regulating primordial functions that ensure organ perfusion through the control of blood pressure and the regulation of renal-cardiac activity. However, the over-expression or lack of compensatory mechanisms of any of its components may initiate detrimental effects that potentially lead to disease, a balance that makes the RAS a sequence with a labile physiological equilibrium and with a strong harm potential. These characteristics of the RAS in general, and of the angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) in particular, make it not only an important complex for the regulation of blood pressure and neuropeptide metabolism, but also a fascinating subject of study from a biochemical, evolutionary and genetic point of view. Pharmacological interventions that influence the RAS by inhibiting the ACE or the angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1R) have demonstrated sustained efficacy in reducing the incidence of cardiovascular events and, consequently, vascular mortality in several clinical situations. ACE inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor antagonists (ARAs) reduce blood pressure and have cardio- and vasculoprotective effects. Anti-atherosclerotic effects have also been attributed to these drugs. For these reasons, it has been hypothesised that RAS inhibitors could also reduce the recurrence of ischaemic events after myocardial revascularisation procedures, namely coronary artery by-pass graft surgery (CABG) or percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). Information available on the effect of ACE inhibitors and ARAs in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) previously treated with revascularisation techniques indicates a substantial reduction of mortality and infarction in these patients. However, data regarding the progression of CAD, restenosis or reocclusion of vascular conduits of the coronary circulation after myocardial revascularisation are inconsistent. In most studies, the administration of ACE inhibitors neither improved the ischaemic threshold nor reduced the need for new revascularisation procedures. On the contrary, ACE inhibitors have been associated with higher restenosis rates after PCI in some retrospective series. Conversely, a single, exploratory randomised trial demonstrated that the selective AT1R antagonist valsartan significantly reduced stent restenosis after PCI. In patients undergoing CABG, ACE inhibitors did not reduce the risk of graft degeneration or occlusion. Studies that evaluated a possible anti-atherosclerotic effect of ACE inhibitors (including some large randomised trials) have generally been negative.

Effect of amlodipine on vascular responses after coronary stenting compared with an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor

BACKGROUND

Prevention of restenosis after coronary stenting is clinically important. We compared amlodipine and quinapril to determine which is more effective in preventing restenosis after stenting.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Immediately after successful coronary stenting of 101 lesions in 63 consecutive patients, the patients were randomly divided into 2 groups: 32 patients with 48 lesions were administered amlodipine 5 mg/day (group A), and 31 patients with 53 lesions were administered quinapril 10 mg/day (group Q). Lesions were assessed by quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) before and immediately after stenting and in the follow-up phase. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) could only be performed on 20 lesions in group A and 16 lesions in group Q throughout the follow-up period. We analyzed each lesion at 5 sites. In the follow-up phase, the minimal lumen diameter in group A was significantly larger than that in group Q (1.88 +/- 0.64 mm vs 1.52 +/- 0.53 mm, p<0.01). In the follow-up phase, the neointimal area (stent area-lumen area) in group A was significantly smaller than that in group Q (1.9 +/- 0.5 mm2 vs 2.7 +/- 0.8 mm2 at the middle portion of stent, p<0.01).

CONCLUSION

These QCA and IVUS findings suggest that amlodipine has beneficial effects in inhibiting neointimal hyperplasia in stented lesions compared with quinapril.

Long-term effects of quinapril with high affinity for tissue angiotensin-converting enzyme after coronary intervention in Japanese

BACKGROUND

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors have been shown experimentally to prevent restenosis after balloon injury. We previously reported that quinapril reduced the 6-month restenosis (percent diameter stenosis >or=50%) rate after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, it was not established whether this favorable outcome was maintained for longer periods.

METHODS

This study was a prospective, randomized, open, and non-placebo controlled trial. Patients with coronary artery disease were enrolled after successful coronary balloon angioplasty or stenting. Two hundred and fifty-three patients were randomly assigned to the quinapril (10-20 mg per day) or control groups. The major clinical end points included death, myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular accident, or revascularization (either coronary artery bypass grafting or repeat PCI). These were tabulated according to the intention-to-treat principle.

RESULTS

Long-term follow-up was available with a median of 4.8 (interquartile range 4.2-5.1) years after the procedure. The incidence of combined end points of mortality and morbidity (myocardial infarction and cerebrovascular accident) in the quinapril group was lower than that in the control group (6.1% vs 14.8%; relative risk [RR] 0.42, 95% CI 0.18-0.96, P =.033). The overall incidence of end-point events in patients with quinapril also occurred less frequently (29.8% vs 46.7%; RR 0.58, 95% CI 0.38-0.86, P =.007).

CONCLUSIONS

These clinical outcomes show that the benefit of quinapril in patients following PCI is maintained for 4 years.

Effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition on restenosis after coronary stenting

The Plasma level of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) has been identified as a major risk factor for restenosis after coronary stent implantation in selected patients; ACE inhibition may therefore contribute to prevent its occurrence. The effect of oral ACE inhibition at conventional doses was analyzed retrospectively in a series of 897 patients with ischemia who received >or=1 coronary stent on 998 lesions and underwent angiographic follow-up; no exclusion criteria were introduced in this analysis. The restenosis rate in 282 patients (31.4%) taking ACE inhibitors was 36.6% compared with 22.9% in 615 non-ACE-inhibited patients (p = 0.00001, odds ratio [OR] 1.94, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.45 to 2.59), and the late loss in minimum lumen diameter was 1.25 +/- 0.8 versus 0.96 +/- 0.8 mm, respectively (p = 0.0001). During univariate analysis, a negative effect of the drug on restenosis was observed in all subgroups of patients (i.e., hypertensives, diabetics, women, and patients with previous myocardial infarction). Similar effects were observed independently of the ACE gene insertion/deletion polymorphism. During multivariate analysis, ACE inhibition was confirmed as an independent risk factor for restenosis (OR 1.84, 95% CI 1.35 to 2.51, p = 0.0001). Other predictors were the implantation of multiple stents (OR 2.41, 95% CI 1.60 to 3.64, p <0.0001), diabetes (OR 2.34, 95% CI 1.61 to 3.41, p <0.0001), and vessel reference diameter before angioplasty (OR 0.51, 95% CI 0.38 to 0.69, p <0.0001). Although unexplained and apparently contradictory, our data suggest that the use of conventional oral doses of ACE inhibitors in a "real-world" population who underwent coronary stent implantation increases the incidence of in-stent restenosis. Such a finding does not negate the known clinical benefits of ACE inhibitors, but it may deserve attention when a patient treated with ACE inhibitors becomes a candidate for stent implantation.

Developments in restenosis

Restenosis is a major complication leading to the failure of vascular procedures, including surgery, angioplasty and stenting. Major efforts including over 100 clinical trials have been made to overcome this complication, with little success to date. Issues relating to trial rationale, design, measurement and biology are addressed in this review.

Quinapril prevents restenosis after coronary stenting in patients with angiotensin-converting enzyme D allele

Restenosis after coronary artery stent implantation is attributed chiefly to intimal hyperplasia, which is prevented experimentally by angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors. Therefore, the present study investigated whether the effect of quinapril, a tissue-specific ACE inhibitor, on the prevention of coronary restenosis differs according to ACE polymorphism. One hundred consecutive patients with successful stent implantation were randomly assigned to quinapril and control groups. Both follow-up angiography and ACE polymorphism analysis were obtained from 92 patients (control, 46; quinapril treatment, 46). The prevalence of risk factors did not differ statistically according to quinapril treatment or ACE genotypes. There was no statistically significant difference in the occurrence of restenosis 6 months after stenting between the groups. Quantitative coronary angiography revealed that quinapril treatment resulted in significantly higher minimal lumen diameter and significantly lower percent diameter stenosis (22.9 +/- 22.6 vs 37.1 +/- 19.7% in the control group, p < 0.05) in patients with the D allele although there was no difference in those with the II genotype. In addition, intravascular ultrasound revealed that quinapril treatment significantly prevented the loss of minimal lumen cross-sectional area and the increase in percent area stenosis (34.5 +/- 14.0 vs 53.3 +/- 16.4% in the control group, p < 0.05) in patients with the D allele compared to those with the II genotype. These results suggest that the administration of ACE inhibitors for the attenuation of lumen loss after coronary stent implantation is best for subjects with the D allele of the ACE genotype.