Preoperative lipid control with simvastatin protects coronary artery bypass grafts from obstructive graft disease

Preoperative statin therapy for adults undergoing cardiac surgery

BACKGROUND

Despite significant advances in surgical techniques and perioperative care, people undertaking cardiac surgery due to cardiovascular disease are more prone to the development of postoperative adverse events. Statins (5-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-co-enzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors) are well-known for their anti-inflammatory and antioxidant effects and are established for primary and secondary prevention of coronary artery disease. In addition, statins are thought to have clinical benefits in perioperative outcomes in people undergoing cardiac surgery. This review is an update of a review that was first published in 2012 and updated in 2015.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the benefits and harms of preoperative statin therapy in adults undergoing cardiac surgery compared to standard of care or placebo.

SEARCH METHODS

We performed a search of the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (Issue 9, 2023), Ovid MEDLINE (1980 to 14 September 2023), and Ovid Embase (1980 to 2023 (week 36)). We applied no language restrictions.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included all randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing any statin treatment before cardiac surgery, for any given duration and dose, versus no preoperative statin therapy (standard of care) or placebo. We excluded trials without a registered trial protocol and trials without approval by an institutional ethics committee.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard Cochrane methodology. Primary outcomes were short-term mortality and major adverse cardiovascular events. Secondary outcomes were myocardial infarction, atrial fibrillation, stroke, renal failure, length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay, length of hospital stay and adverse effects related to statin therapy. We reported effect measures as risk ratios (RRs) or mean differences (MDs) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We used the RoB 1 tool to assess the risk of bias in included trials, and GRADE to assess the certainty of the evidence.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified eight RCTs (five new to this review) including 5592 participants. Pooled analysis showed that statin treatment before surgery may result in little to no difference in the risk of postoperative short-term mortality (RR 1.36, 95% CI 0.72 to 2.59; I2 = 0%; 6 RCTs, 5260 participants; low-certainty evidence; note 2 RCTs reported 0 events in both groups so RR calculated from 4 RCTs with 5143 participants). We are very uncertain about the effect of statins on major adverse cardiovascular events (RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.77 to 1.13; 1 RCT, 2406 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Statins probably result in little to no difference in myocardial infarction (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.73 to 1.06; I2 = 0%; 5 RCTs, 4645 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), may result in little to no difference in atrial fibrillation (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.72 to 1.05; I2 = 60%; 8 RCTs, 5592 participants; low-certainty evidence), and may result in little to no difference in stroke (RR 1.47, 95% CI 0.90 to 2.40; I2 = 0%; 4 RCTs, 5143 participants; low-certainty evidence). We are very uncertain about the effect of statins on renal failure (RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.80 to 1.34; I2 = 57%; 4 RCTs, 4728 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Additionally, statins probably result in little to no difference in length of ICU stay (MD 1.40 hours, 95% CI -1.62 to 4.41; I2 = 43%; 3 RCTs, 4528 participants; moderate-certainty evidence) and overall hospital stay (MD -0.31 days, 95% CI -0.64 to 0.03; I2 = 84%; 5 RCTs, 4788 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). No study had any individual risk of bias domain classified as high. However, two studies were at high risk of bias overall given the classification of unclear risk of bias in three domains.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

In this updated Cochrane review, we found no evidence that statin use in the perioperative period of elective cardiac surgery was associated with any clinical benefit or worsening, when compared with placebo or standard of care. Compared with placebo or standard of care, statin use probably results in little to no difference in MIs, length of ICU stay and overall hospital stay; and may make little to no difference to mortality, atrial fibrillation and stroke. We are very uncertain about the effects of statins on major harmful cardiac events and renal failure. The certainty of the evidence validating this finding varied from moderate to very low, depending on the outcome. Future trials should focus on assessing the impact of statin therapy on mortality and major adverse cardiovascular events.

Acute Coronary Syndromes Among Patients with Prior Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Acute coronary syndromes (ACS) often occur in individuals with prior coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG). Our goal was to describe the prevalence, clinical characteristics, prognosis, and treatment strategies in this group of patients.

RECENT FINDINGS

Studies demonstrate that both acute and long-term major adverse cardiovascular outcomes are increased in patients with ACS and prior CABG compared to those without CABG. Much of this risk is attributed to the greater comorbid conditions present in patients with prior CABG. Data regarding optimal management of ACS in patients with prior CABG are limited, but most observational studies favor an early invasive approach for treatment. Native vessel percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), if feasible, is generally preferred to bypass graft PCI. Patients with ACS and prior CABG represent a high-risk group of individuals, and implementing optimal preventive and treatment strategies are critically important to reduce the risk.

Secondary prevention after coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a primer

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Despite the benefits of surgical coronary revascularization, patients continue to be at risk for ischemic events in the years that follow coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG), mandating the role for postoperative secondary preventive therapy. The purpose of this review was to present a summary on the subject of secondary prevention after CABG, including an overview of a recently published scientific statement, and highlight the newest studies in the field.

RECENT FINDINGS

Aspirin and statin therapy continue to be the mainstay of secondary prevention after CABG, although newer antiplatelet and lipid-lowering medicines are being actively studied for their potential benefits. Other important elements to secondary prevention after CABG include the aggressive management of hypertension, smoking cessation, and the initiation of cardiac rehabilitation.

SUMMARY

Secondary prevention is an essential component of postoperative care after CABG. Instituting preventive therapies after surgery optimizes graft patency and helps patients achieve the highest level of physical health and quality of life following CABG.

Efficacy of Different Perioperative Statin Regimens on Protection Against Post-Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Major Adverse Cardiac and Cerebral Events

OBJECTIVES

Comparing different perioperative statin regimens for the prevention of post-coronary artery bypass grafting adverse events.

DESIGN

A randomized, prospective study.

SETTING

Cardiothoracic surgical units in a government hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

The study comprised 94 patients scheduled for elective, isolated on- or off- pump coronary artery bypass grafting.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were assigned randomly to 1 of the following 3 treatment groups: group I (80 mg of atorvastatin/day for 2 days preoperatively), group II (40 mg of atorvastatin/day for 5-9 days preoperatively), or group III (80 mg of atorvastatin/day for 5-9 days preoperatively). The same preoperative doses were restarted postoperatively and continued for 1 month.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Cardiac troponin I, creatine kinase, and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels were assayed preoperatively; at 8, 24, and 48 hours postoperatively; and at discharge. CRP levels at 24 hours (p = 0.045) and 48 hours (p = 0.009) were significantly lower in group III compared with the other 2 groups. However, troponin I levels at 8 hours (p = 0.011) and 48 hours (p = 0.025) after surgery were significantly lower in group II compared with group III. The incidence of postoperative major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events was assessed, and there was no significant difference among the 3 groups.

CONCLUSION

The 3 regimens did not result in any significant difference in outcomes, but only simple trends. The higher-dose regimen resulted in a significant reduction in the CRP level. Thus, more studies are needed to confirm the benefit of higher-dose statins for the protection from post-coronary artery bypass grafting adverse events.

WITHDRAWN: Preoperative statin therapy for patients undergoing cardiac surgery

This review has been withdrawn as authors are unable to complete the updating process.

The editorial group responsible for this previously published document have withdrawn it from publication.

Preoperative statin therapy for patients undergoing cardiac surgery

BACKGROUND

Patients referred to cardiac surgery for cardiovascular disease are at significant risk for the development of major postoperative adverse events despite significant advances in surgical techniques and perioperative care. Statins (5-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-co-enzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors) have gained a pivotal role in the primary and secondary prevention of coronary artery disease and are thought to improve perioperative outcomes in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. This review is an updated version of a review that was first published in 2012.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effectiveness of preoperative statin therapy in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (2013, Issue 11), MEDLINE (1950 to November 2013 Week 3), EMBASE (1980 to 3 December 2013 (Week 48)) and the metaRegister of Controlled Trials. Additionally, we searched ongoing trials through the National Research Register, the ClinicalTrials.gov registry and grey literature. We screened online conference indices from relevant scientific meetings (2006 to 2014) to look for eligible trials. We applied no language restrictions.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised controlled trials comparing any statin treatment before cardiac surgery, for any given duration and dose, versus no preoperative statin therapy (standard of care) or placebo.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors evaluated trial quality and extracted data from titles and abstracts identified by electronic database searches according to predefined criteria. Accordingly, we retrieved full-text articles of potentially relevant studies that met the inclusion criteria to assess definitive eligibility for inclusion. We reported effect measures as odds ratios (ORs) or weighted mean differences (WMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs).

MAIN RESULTS

We identified 17 randomised controlled studies including a total of 2138 participants undergoing on-pump or off-pump cardiac surgical procedures, and added to this review six studies with 1154 additional participants. Pooled analysis showed that statin treatment before surgery reduced the incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation (AF) (OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.43 to 0.67; P value < 0.01; 12 studies, 1765 participants) but failed to influence short-term mortality (OR 1.80, 95% CI 0.38 to 8.54; P value = 0.46; two studies, 300 participants) or postoperative stroke (OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.14 to 3.63; P value = 0.67; two studies, 264 participants). In addition, statin therapy was associated with a shorter stay for patients on the intensive care unit (ICU) (WMD -3.19 hours, 95% CI -5.41 to -0.98; nine studies, 721 participants) and in the hospital (WMD -0.48 days, 95% CI -0.78 to -0.19; 11 studies, 1137 participants) when significant heterogeneity was observed. Results showed no reduction in myocardial infarction (OR 0.48, 95% CI 0.21 to 1.13; seven studies, 901 participants) or renal failure (OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.30 to 1.10; five studies, 467 participants) and were not affected by subgroup analysis. Trials investigating this safety endpoint reported no major or minor perioperative side effects of statins.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative statin therapy reduces the odds of postoperative atrial fibrillation (AF) and shortens the patient's stay on the ICU and in the hospital. Statin pretreatment had no influence on perioperative mortality, stroke, myocardial infarction or renal failure, but only two of all included studies assessed mortality. As analysed studies included mainly individuals undergoing myocardial revascularisation, results cannot be extrapolated to patients undergoing other cardiac procedures such as heart valve or aortic surgery.

HMG CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) for preventing acute kidney injury after surgical procedures requiring cardiac bypass

BACKGROUND

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is common in patients undergoing cardiac surgery among whom it is associated with poor outcomes, prolonged hospital stays and increased mortality. Statin drugs can produce more than one effect independent of their lipid lowering effect, and may improve kidney injury through inhibition of postoperative inflammatory responses.

OBJECTIVES

This review aimed to look at the evidence supporting the benefits of perioperative statins for AKI prevention in hospitalised adults after surgery who require cardiac bypass. The main objectives were to 1) determine whether use of statins was associated with preventing AKI development; 2) determine whether use of statins was associated with reductions in in-hospital mortality; 3) determine whether use of statins was associated with reduced need for RRT; and 4) determine any adverse effects associated with the use of statins.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Renal Group's Specialised Register to 13 January 2015 through contact with the Trials' Search Co-ordinator using search terms relevant to this review.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared administration of statin therapy with placebo or standard clinical care in adult patients undergoing surgery requiring cardiopulmonary bypass and reporting AKI, serum creatinine (SCr) or need for renal replacement therapy (RRT) as an outcome were eligible for inclusion. All forms and dosages of statins in conjunction with any duration of pre-operative therapy were considered for inclusion in this review.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

All authors extracted data independently and assessments were cross-checked by a second author. Likewise, assessment of study risk of bias was initially conducted by one author and then by a second author to ensure accuracy. Disagreements were arbitrated among authors until consensus was reached. Authors from two of the included studies provided additional data surrounding post-operative SCr as well as need for RRT. Meta-analyses were used to assess the outcomes of AKI, SCr and mortality rate. Data for the outcomes of RRT and adverse effects were not pooled. Adverse effects taken into account were those reported by the authors of included studies.

MAIN RESULTS

We included seven studies (662 participants) in this review. All except one study was assessed as being at high risk of bias. Three studies assessed atorvastatin, three assessed simvastatin and one investigated rosuvastatin. All studies collected data during the immediate perioperative period only; data collection to hospital discharge and postoperative biochemical data collection ranged from 24 hours to 7 days. Overall, pre-operative statin treatment was not associated with a reduction in postoperative AKI, need for RRT, or mortality. Only two studies (195 participants) reported postoperative SCr level. In those studies, patients allocated to receive statins had lower postoperative SCr concentrations compared with those allocated to no drug treatment/placebo (MD 21.2 µmol/L, 95% CI -31.1 to -11.1). Adverse effects were adequately reported in only one study; no difference was found between the statin group compared to placebo.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Analysis of currently available data did not suggest that preoperative statin use is associated with decreased incidence of AKI in adults after surgery who required cardiac bypass. Although a significant reduction in SCr was seen postoperatively in people treated with statins, this result was driven by results from a single study, where SCr was considered as a secondary outcome. The results of the meta-analysis should be interpreted with caution; few studies were included in subgroup analyses, and significant differences in methodology exist among the included studies. Large high quality RCTs are required to establish the safety and efficacy of statins to prevent AKI after cardiac surgery.

Preoperative statin therapy for patients undergoing cardiac surgery

BACKGROUND

Patients referred to cardiac surgery for cardiovascular disease are at significant risk for the development of post-operative major adverse events despite significant advances in surgical techniques and perioperative care. Statins (HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors) have gained a pivotal role in the primary and secondary prevention of coronary artery disease, and are thought to improve perioperative outcomes in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effectiveness of a preoperative statin therapy in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL (Issue 2 of 4, 2010 on The Cochrane Library), MEDLINE (1950 to May, Week 1 2010), EMBASE (1980 to 2010 Week 19), and the metaRegister of Controlled Trials. Additionally, ongoing trials were searched through the National Research Register, the ClinicalTrials.gov registry and grey literature. Conference indices from relevant scientific meetings (2006-2009) were screened online for eligible trials. No language restrictions were applied.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomized controlled trials comparing any statin treatment before cardiac surgery, for any given duration and dose, to no preoperative statin therapy (standard of care) or placebo.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors evaluated trial quality and extracted data from titles and abstracts identified from the electronic database searches according to pre-defined criteria. Accordingly, full text articles of potentially relevant studies that met the inclusion criteria were retrieved to assess definite eligibility for inclusion. Effect measures are reported as odds ratios (OR) or weighted mean difference (WMD) with 95% confidence intervals (95%-CI).

MAIN RESULTS

Eleven randomized controlled studies including a total of 984 participants undergoing on- or off-pump cardiac surgical procedures were identified. Pooled analysis showed that statin pre-treatment before surgery reduced the incidence of post-operative atrial fibrillation (AF) (OR 0.40; 95%-CI: 0.29 to 0.55; p<0.01), but failed to influence short-term mortality (OR 0.98, 95%-CI: 0.14 to 7.10; p=0.98) or post-operative stroke (OR 0.70, 95%-CI: 0.14 to 3.63; p=0.67). In addition, statin therapy was associated with a shorter length of stay of patients on the intensive care unit (ICU) (WMD: -3.39 hours; 95%-CI: -5.77 to -1.01) and in-hospital (WMD: -0.48 days; 95%-CI: -0.85 to -0.11) where significant heterogeneity was observed. There was no reduction in myocardial infarction (OR 0.52; 95%-CI: 0.2. to 1.30) or renal failure (OR 0.41; 95%-CI: 0.15 to 1.12). These results were unaffected after subgroup analysis. No major or minor perioperative statin side-effects were reported from trials investigating this safety endpoint.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative statin therapy reduces the odds of post-operative AF and shortens the stay on the ICU and in the hospital. Statin pretreatment had no influence on perioperative mortality, stroke, myocardial infarction or renal failure. Since analysed studies included mainly patients undergoing myocardial revascularizations the results cannot be extrapolated to patients undergoing other cardiac procedures such as heart valve or aortic surgery.

Lipid-lowering therapy and coronary artery bypass graft surgery: what are the benefits?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Despite their apparent benefits, statins remain underutilized after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. To summarize the literature regarding statin therapy and CABG, we performed a systematic review of the Medline database from 1987-2011 to assess the benefits of statins in CABG patients, including the role of high-dose therapy, and highlight areas for future study.

RECENT FINDINGS

When administered prior to CABG, statins reduce the risk of perioperative mortality, stroke, and atrial fibrillation. After CABG, statins limit the progression of atherosclerosis in native coronary arteries, inhibit the process of saphenous vein graft disease, and improve vein graft patency. Furthermore, postoperative statins reduce the recurrence of cardiovascular events and improve all-cause mortality. High-intensity statin therapy early after surgery may benefit CABG patients, but this is yet to be evaluated prospectively.

SUMMARY

Statins clearly improve the outcomes of CABG patients. In the absence of contraindications, all patients undergoing CABG are candidates for life-long statin therapy, with initiation recommended as soon as coronary disease is documented. Statins should be restarted early after surgery. However, the optimal postoperative lipid-lowering regimen remains unknown and should be the subject of upcoming trials. Strategies directed toward improving statin prescription rates and patient adherence should also be priorities for future research.

Adverse events associated with individual statin treatments for cardiovascular disease: an indirect comparison meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Statins are the most widely prescribed drug available. Due to this reason, it is important to understand the risks involved with the drug class and individual statins.

AIM

We conducted a meta-analysis and employed indirect comparisons to identify differing risk effects across statins.

DESIGN

We included any randomized clinical trial (RCT) of atorvastatin, fluvastatin, lovastatin, pitavastatin, pravastatin, rosuvastatin and simvastatin used for cardiovascular disease event prevention. The main outcome was adverse events [all-cause mortality, cancers, rhabdomylosis, diabetes, aspartate and alanine aminotransferase (AST/ALT), and creatinine kinase (CK) increases beyond the upper limit of normal]. In order to evaluate the relative effects of each drug on adverse events, we calculated adjusted indirect comparisons of the adverse-event outcomes.

RESULTS

Seventy-two trials involving 159,458 patients met our inclusion criteria. Overall, statin treatments significantly increased the rate of diabetes when compared to controls (OR: 1.09; 95% CI: 1.02-1.16) and elevated AST (OR: 1.31; 95% CI: 1.04-1.66) and ALT (OR: 1.28; 95% CI: 1.11-1.48) levels when compared to controls. Using indirect comparisons, we also found that atorvastatin significantly elevated AST levels compared to pravastatin (OR: 2.21; 95% CI: 1.13-4.29) and simvastatin significantly increased CK levels when compared to rosuvastatin (OR: 4.39; 95% CI: 1.01-19.07). Higher dose studies had increased risk of AST elevations.

DISCUSSION

Although statins are generally well tolerated, there are risks associated with almost all drugs. With few exceptions, statins appear to exert a similar risk across individual drugs.

Simvastatin exerts favourable effects on neointimal formation in a mouse model of vein graft

BACKGROUND

Simvastatin inhibits human saphenous vein neointima formation in human saphenous vein organ cultures. However, it is not known if simvastatin actually inhibits vein graft intima hyperplasia in vivo, and the underlying mechanisms behind that. In this study, we used a murine vein graft model to address these issues.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Vein grafting was performed among C57BL/6 J mice treated with low-dose (2 mg kg(-1)) or high-dose (20 mg kg(-1)) simvastatin or vehicle subcutaneously 72 h before and then daily after surgery. As compared to the vehicle, simvastatin dose-dependently significantly inhibited vein graft intima hyperplasia 4 weeks after surgeries. Immunohistochemistry studies suggested that vein graft neointima was mainly composed of vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs), and the rate of proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA)-positive cells in the intima of vein grafts was significantly lower in simvastatin-treated groups than in control group. We isolated VSMC from mouse vena cava, simvastatin significantly reduced VSMC proliferation, and platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF)-induced VSMC migration in a dose-dependent manner.

CONCLUSION

Simvastatin inhibits neointima formation of mouse vein graft under normocholesterolaemic condition in vivo, the mechanisms might be associated with inhibitory effects of simvastatin on VSMC proliferation and migration.

Current evidence for perioperative statins in cardiac surgery

Cardiac surgery improves life expectancy and quality of life for the constantly ageing population in developed countries. Mediated by their lipid-dependent and lipid-independent mechanisms, statins are sought to provide benefit with regard to better outcomes after cardiac surgery. Current guidelines recommend statin use in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting, while less evidence is available for patients referred to heart valve surgery. Optimal selection of statin drug and dosage including perioperative timing of statin therapy remains largely unknown, but results of ongoing meta-analyses and future randomized trials will add important evidence to guide perioperative statin treatment of cardiac surgery patients.

Efficacy and safety of statin treatment for cardiovascular disease: a network meta-analysis of 170,255 patients from 76 randomized trials

BACKGROUND

Statins represent the largest selling class of cardiovascular drug in the world. Previous randomized trials (RCTs) have demonstrated important clinical benefits with statin therapy.

AIM

We combined evidence from all RCTs comparing a statin with placebo or usual care among patients with and without prior coronary heart disease (CHD) to determine clinical outcomes.

DESIGN

We searched independently, in duplicate, 12 electronic databases (from inception to August 2010), including full text journal content databases, to identify all statin versus inert control RCTs. We included RCTs of any statin versus any non-drug control in any populations. We abstracted data in duplicate on reported major clinical events and adverse events. We performed a random-effects meta-analysis and meta-regression. We performed a mixed treatment comparison using Bayesian methods.

RESULTS

We included a total of 76 RCTs involving 170,255 participants. There were a total of 14,878 deaths. Statin therapy reduced all-cause mortality, Relative Risk (RR) 0.90 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.86-0.94, P ≤ 0.0001, I(2)=17%]; cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.74-0.87, P<0.0001, I(2)=27%); fatal myocardial infarction (MI) (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.75-0.91, P<0.0001, I(2)=21%); non-fatal MI (RR 0.74, 95% CI 0.67-0.81, P ≤ 0.001, I(2)=45%); revascularization (RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.70-0.81, P ≤ 0.0001); and a composite of fatal and non-fatal strokes (0.86, 95% CI 0.78-0.95, P=0.004, I(2)=41%). Adverse events were generally mild, but 17 RCTs reported on increased risk of development of incident diabetes [Odds Ratio (OR) 1.09; 95% CI 1.02-1.17, P=0.001, I(2)=11%]. Studies did not yield important differences across populations. We did not find any differing treatment effects between statins.

DISCUSSION

Statin therapies offer clear benefits across broad populations. As generic formulations become more available efforts to expand access should be a priority.

Risk factors for lower-extremity vein graft failure

Lower-extremity vein graft failure causes significant morbidity, increases health care costs, and negatively impacts patient quality of life. Identification of risk factors is essential for patient selection, risk factor modification, and identifying individuals who would benefit from more stringent surveillance protocols. Risk factors can be considered as either patient-related or technical. Here we discuss the patient-related risk factors for vein graft failure. Nontechnical factors related to the indication for operation include operation after a previously failed graft, or redo bypass, critical limb ischemia, and infection. Risk factors for vein graft failure are distinct from the risk factors for cardiovascular events. Young age and African American and Hispanic race are risk factors for lower-extremity vein graft failure. Hypercoaguable and inflammatory states also increase risk for vein graft failure. Therapy with statins is indicated in patients with peripheral atherosclerosis and may have beneficial effects on vein graft function, although further studies are needed in this area.

Impact of preoperative statin therapy on adverse postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis of over 30,000 patients

AIMS

To determine the strength of evidence for preoperative statin use for prevention of adverse postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

METHODS AND RESULTS

After literature search in major databases, 19 studies were identified [three RCT (randomized prospective clinical trials), 16 observational] that reported outcomes of 31 725 cardiac surgery patients with (n = 17 201; 54%) or without (n = 14 524; 46%) preoperative statin therapy. Outcomes that were analysed included early all-cause mortality (30-day mortality), myocardial infarction (MI), atrial fibrillation (AF), stroke and renal failure. Odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) were reported using fixed or random effect models and publication bias was assessed. Preoperative statin therapy resulted in a 1.5% absolute risk reduction (2.2 vs. 3.7%; P < 0.0001) and 43% odds reduction for early all-cause mortality (OR 0.57; 95%CI: 0.49-0.67). A significant reduction (P < 0.01) in statin pretreated patients was also observed for AF (24.9 vs. 29.3%; OR 0.67, 95%CI: 0.51-0.88), stroke (2.1 vs. 2.9%, OR 0.74, 95%CI: 0.60-0.91), but not for MI (OR 1.11; 95%CI: 0.93-1.33) or renal failure (OR 0.78, 95%CI: 0.46-1.31). Funnel plot and Egger's regression analysis (P = 0.60) excluded relevant publication bias.

CONCLUSION

Our meta-analysis provides evidence that preoperative statin therapy exerts substantial clinical benefit on early postoperative adverse outcomes in cardiac surgery patients, but underscores the need for RCT trials.

Comparison of the efficacies of five different statins on inhibition of human saphenous vein smooth muscle cell proliferation and invasion

Statins (HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors) exhibit beneficial effects on the vasculature independently of their cholesterol-lowering properties. These pleiotropic effects underlie the ability of statins to reduce intimal hyperplasia in saphenous vein (SV) bypass grafts by attenuating smooth muscle cell (SMC) invasion and proliferation. Although all statins can effectively lower cholesterol, the pleiotropic effects of individual statins may well differ. We therefore compared the concentration-dependent effects of 4 lipophilic statins (simvastatin, atorvastatin, fluvastatin, and lovastatin) and 1 hydrophilic statin (pravastatin) on the proliferation and invasion of SMC cultured from SV of 9 different patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). The lipophilic statins inhibited SV-SMC proliferation over a 4-day period with an order of potency of fluvastatin > atorvastatin > simvastatin > lovastatin (IC50 range = 0.07 to 1.77 microM). Similarly, these statins also inhibited SV-SMC invasion through an artificial basement membrane barrier (fluvastatin > atorvastatin > simvastatin >> lovastatin; IC50 range = 0.92 to 26.9 microM). In contrast, the hydrophilic pravastatin had no significant effect on SV-SMC proliferation at concentrations up to 10 microM, nor did it attenuate SV-SMC invasion (up to 30 microM). Our data provide strong evidence that individual statins possess differential pleiotropic effects on SV-SMC function. This may be of clinical relevance in the selection of individual statins for the treatment of CABG patients.

Expansive remodeling in venous bypass grafts: novel implications for vein graft disease

OBJECTIVE

To date, intimal hyperplasia has been regarded as the principle mechanism responsible for subsequent vein graft disease. Lumen remodeling has not been previously considered as an additional mechanism. The objectives of this study were to determine changes in lumen remodeling in arterialized vein grafts, the accompanying cellular and extracellular matrix events contributing to remodeling, and the effects of a high cholesterol diet.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Reversed jugular vein-to-common carotid artery interposition grafts were constructed in 70 normocholesterolemic and 11 hypercholesterolemic male New Zealand white rabbits. The lumen area initially remained unchanged between 1 and 4 weeks but significantly increased by 40% at 12 weeks. This phase of expansive positive remodeling was accompanied by significantly increased cell apoptosis, collagen synthesis (1.7-fold), collagen content (3.7-fold), gelatinase (MMP-2 and MMP-9) levels and decreased tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase (TIMP) levels. Expansive remodeling temporally corresponded to high macrophage infiltration and increased low density lipoprotein (LDL) retention (fourfold) in the vein grafts. A high cholesterol diet stimulated early macrophage infiltration and increased MMP-12 (metalloelastase) levels, which was associated with earlier onset of expansive remodeling.

CONCLUSION

Expansive lumenal remodeling is a novel mechanism of vein graft response to the arterial circulation, which is accelerated by a high cholesterol diet.

CRP, IL-6 and endothelin-1 levels in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. Do preoperative inflammatory parameters predict early graft occlusion and late cardiovascular events?

BACKGROUND

Inflammation is a major contributor to atherosclerotic vascular disease. Inflammatory parameters such as C-reactive protein (CRP) and Interleukin-6 (IL-6) have been shown to be strong predictors of cardiovascular events. The association between preoperative inflammatory parameters and early graft occlusion as well as cardiovascular events after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) has not, however, been fully elucidated. The aims of the present study were to prospectively investigate the prognostic value of the inflammatory parameters IL-6, CRP, and endothelin (ET-1) to predict early graft occlusion as well as late cardiovascular events after CABG.

METHODS

In the present study 99 patients undergoing CABG because of stable angina pectoris due to significant coronary artery disease were prospectively included. Coronary angiography was repeated 3 months after CABG in 81 patients in order to evaluate early graft occlusion. Blood samples were collected before CABG in all patients. Patients were followed up for a median of 5 (3-7) years after CABG.

RESULTS

Twenty-five patients (31%) had one or more occluded grafts at the 3-month control coronary angiography. The patients with occluded grafts had higher preoperative CRP and IL-6 levels in plasma [CRP 2.22 (1.11-4.47) mg/L vs. 1.23 (0.71-2.27) mg/L P=0.03] and [IL-6 2.88 (1.91-5.94) pg/mL vs. 2.15 (1.54-3.14) pg/mL P=0.006]. There were 23 late cardiovascular events among the 99 patients during the follow-up. Patients experiencing late cardiovascular events had higher preoperative IL-6 levels than those without late cardiovascular events [4.13 (1.83-5.87) pg/mL vs. 2.08 (1.53-2.29) pg/mL, P=0.002] whereas CRP levels did not differ significantly between the two groups [1.5 (0.79-4.41) mg/L vs. 1.33 (0.74-2.48) mg/L, P=0.41]. Looking at IL-6, a cut off value more than 3.8 pg/ml was associated with a significant higher risk for an early graft occlusion (P=0.04) and late cardiovascular events (P=0.00003). Preoperative endothelin-1 did not predict early graft occlusions or late cardiovascular events.

CONCLUSIONS

Raised preoperative IL-6 levels are predictors of both early graft occlusion and late cardiovascular events after CABG. Elevated preoperative CRP levels can predict early graft occlusion after CABG. Endothelin did not differ between the two groups.

Selective gene silencing of either MMP-2 or MMP-9 inhibits invasion of human saphenous vein smooth muscle cells

Activation of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) facilitates smooth muscle cell (SMC) invasion, an important event in the development of intimal hyperplasia in saphenous vein (SV) bypass grafts. In this study, we performed selective gene silencing using small inhibitory RNA (siRNA) oligonucleotides to examine the relative contributions of MMP-2 and MMP-9 to the invasiveness of cultured human SV-SMCs. Cultures were established from human SV obtained from patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery. Transfection of SV-SMCs with MMP-2 siRNA selectively reduced MMP-2 secretion and inhibited invasion through a Matrigel barrier. Supplementation of medium with recombinant MMP-2 overcame these effects. Similarly, transfection of SV-SMCs with MMP-9 siRNA selectively reduced MMP-9 secretion and subsequent invasion, effects reversed by recombinant MMP-9 supplementation. Neither MMP-2 nor MMP-9 siRNA inhibited SV-SMC migration in the absence of a Matrigel barrier. Our data demonstrate that selective gene-silencing of either MMP-2 or MMP-9 markedly reduces the invasive capacity of cultured human SV-SMCs, indicating that these MMPs play distinct non-overlapping roles in SV-SMC invasion in vitro. Specific manipulation of either MMP-2 or MMP-9 may therefore provide a valuable strategy for prevention of SV graft stenosis in man.

Simvastatin inhibits MMP‐9 secretion from human saphenous vein smooth muscle cells by inhibiting the RhoA/ROCK pathway and reducing MMP‐9 mRNA levels

Increased matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) expression is associated with intimal hyperplasia in saphenous vein (SV) bypass grafts. Recent evidence suggests that HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) can prevent the progression of vein graft failure. Here we investigated whether statins inhibited MMP-9 secretion from cultured human SV smooth muscle cells (SMC) and examined the underlying mechanisms. SV-SMC from different patients were exposed to phorbol ester (TPA) or PDGF-BB plus interleukin-1alpha (IL-1). MMP-9 secretion and mRNA expression were analyzed using gelatin zymography and RT-PCR, respectively. Specific signal transduction pathways were investigated by immunoblotting and pharmacological inhibition. Simvastatin reduced TPA- and PDGF/IL-1-induced MMP-9 secretion and mRNA levels, effects reversed by geranylgeranyl pyrophosphate and mimicked by inhibiting Rho geranylgeranylation or Rho-kinase (ROCK). MMP-9 secretion induced by PDGF/IL-1 was mediated via the ERK, p38 MAPK, and NFkappaB pathways, whereas that induced by TPA was mediated specifically via the ERK pathway. Simvastatin failed to inhibit activation of these signaling pathways. Moreover, simvastatin did not affect MMP-9 mRNA stability. Together these data suggest that simvastatin reduces MMP-9 secretion from human SV-SMC by inhibiting the RhoA/ROCK pathway and decreasing MMP-9 mRNA levels independently of effects on signaling pathways required for MMP-9 gene expression.

The Myocardial Ischemia Reduction with Acute Cholesterol Lowering trial: MIRACuLous or not, it's time to change current practice

The Myocardial Ischemia Reduction with Aggressive Cholesterol Lowering (MIRACL) study was the first trial to assess whether statins might be of clinical benefit in those with recently unstable coronary disease. MIRACL found that high-dose atorvastatin was safe and reduced the incidence of the composite endpoint, death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, resuscitated sudden cardiac death or emergent rehospitalization for recurrent ischemia at 16 weeks when compared with placebo. Despite a number of important study limitations, MIRACL's findings and the prior observation that inpatient initiation of lipid-lowering therapy is associated with higher rates of subsequent utilization, suggest that it is prudent to begin statin therapy when patients present with an acute coronary syndrome.