Lingering misconceptions about type I second-degree atrioventricular block

The Wenckebach Phenomenon

Medicine has many great pioneers, and in 1899, one such pioneer - Karel Frederik Wenckebach made a discovery which, even to this day, remains one of the fundamental concepts within electrophysiology.

Since the Wenckebach Phenomenon was first described, the field of electrophysiology has developed at a rapid pace, allowing us to observe this behaviour, and its complexities, in many new ways. In a similar way, this chapter will illustrate Wenckebach behaviour across a spectrum of modalities from the 12 lead ECG, through to the intra-cardiac recordings from both electrophysiological studies and implantable cardiac devices. In doing so, we continue to shed light on the phe-nomenon first identified through Wenckebach’s meticulous attention to detail some 120 years ago.

Electrocardiographic interpretation in athletes

Participation in regular exercise of moderate intensity is associated with a plethora of systemic benefits, including a reduction in risk factors for coronary atherosclerosis; however, intensive exercise may paradoxically culminate in sudden cardiac arrest among individuals harboring arrhythmogenic substrates. The precise mechanism for arrhythmogenesis is likely multifactorial, however, surges in catecholamines, electrolyte shifts, acid-base disturbances, increased core temperature and demand myocardial ischemia are potential contributors. Although most deaths occur in middle aged and older males with atherosclerotic coronary artery disease, a significant proportion also affect young athletes with inherited or congenital cardiac abnormalities. The impact of such catastrophes on society, particularly when a young high-profile athlete is affected could be considered a justified reason for identifying individuals who may be at risk. Given the rarity of deaths in young athletes, only the simplest screening test, such as the 12-lead electrocardiography (ECG) may be considered to be cost effective. The ECG is effective for detecting serious electrical diseases in young athletes such as congenital electrical accessory pathways and ion channel diseases but can also identify athletes with potential life-threatening structural diseases such as hypertrophic and arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy. One of the concerns about ECG screening is that regular intensive exercise results in several physiological alterations in cardiac structure and function that are reflected on the athlete's ECG. Sinus bradycardia, first-degree atrioventricular block, incomplete right bundle branch block, minor J-point elevation and large QRS voltages are common. Conversely, some repolarization anomalies affecting the ST segment, T waves and QT interval may overlap with patterns observed in patients with serious cardiac diseases. The situation is complicated further because age, sex and ethnicity of the athletes also influence the ECG and there is a risk that erroneous interpretation could have serious consequences. This review will describe the normal electrical patterns of the "athlete's heart" and provide insights into differentiation physiological electrical patterns from those observed in serious cardiac disease.

Second-degree atrioventricular block revisited

Type I second-degree atrioventricular (AV) block describes visible, differing, and generally decremental AV conduction. The literature contains numerous differing definitions of second-degree AV block, especially Mobitz type II second-degree AV block. The widespread use of numerous disparate definitions of type II block appears primarily responsible for many of the diagnostic problems surrounding second-degree AV block. Adherence to the correct definitions provides a logical and simple framework for clinical evaluation. Type II second-degree AV block describes what appears to be an all-or-none conduction without visible changes in the AV conduction time before and after the blocked impulse. Although the diagnosis of type II block requires a stable sinus rate, absence of sinus slowing is an important criterion of type II block because a vagal surge (generally a benign condition) can cause simultaneous sinus slowing and AV nodal block, which can superficially resemble type II block. Furthermore, type II block has not yet been reported in inferior myocardial infarction (MI) and in young athletes where type I block may be misinterpreted as type II block. The diagnosis of type II block cannot be established if the first postblock P wave is followed by a shortened PR interval or the P wave is not discernible. A narrow QRS type I block is almost always AV nodal, whereas a type I block with bundle branch block barring acute MI is infranodal in 60-70 % of cases. A 2:1 AV block cannot be classified in terms of type I or type II block, but it can be nodal or infranodal. A pattern resembling a narrow QRS type II block in association with an obvious type I structure in the same recording (e.g., Holter) effectively rules out type II block because the coexistence of both types of narrow QRS block is exceedingly rare. Concealed (nonpropagated) His bundle or ventricular extrasystoles may mimic both type I and/or type II block (pseudo AV block). All correctly defined type II blocks are infranodal. Infranodal block presenting with either type I or II manifestations requires pacing regardless of QRS duration or symptoms.

Atrioventricular block revisited

AV blocks, their definitions and significance, are discussed. Type II, second-degree AV block is infranodal, whereas 2/3 of Type I with BBB are infranodal, 2:1 AV block is neither Type I nor II block. Infranodal blocks require pacing regardless of symptoms.