Impact of deep vessel wall injury on acute response and remodeling of coronary artery segments after cutting balloon angioplasty

Impact of Cutting Balloon Angioplasty (CBA) Prior to Bare Metal Stenting on Restenosis A Prospective Randomized Multicenter Trial Comparing CBA With Balloon Angioplasty (BA) Before Stenting (REDUCE III)

BACKGROUND

While stent restenosis and late thrombosis still occur even with drug-eluting-stents (DES), there remains a need to explore other strategies for preventing restenosis.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Five hundred and twenty-one patients were randomized: 260 to cutting-balloon angioplasty (CBA) before bare-metal stent (CBA-BMS) and 261 to balloon-angioplasty (BA) before BMS (BA-BMS). Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided procedures were performed in 279 (54%) patients and angiographic guidance was used in the remainder. Minimal lumen diameter was significantly greater in CBA-BMS than BA-BMS (2.65+/-0.40 mm vs 2.52+/-0.4 mm, p<0.01) and % diameter stenosis (%DS)-post was less in CBA-BMS than BA-BMS (14.0+/-5.9% vs 16.3+/-6.8%, p<0.01). %DS-follow-up was subsequently less in CBA-BMS than BA-BMS (32.4+/-15.1% vs 35.4+/-15.3%, p<0.05) associated with lower rates of restenosis in CBA-BMS than BA-BMS (11.8% vs 19.6%, p<0.05) and less target lesion revascularization (TLR) in CBA-BMS than BA-BMS (9.6% vs 15.3%, p<0.05). Patients were divided into 4 groups based on the device used before stenting and IVUS use (IVUS-CBA-BMS: 137 patients; Angio-CBA-BMS: 123; IVUS-BA-BMS: 142; and Angio-BA-BMS: 119). At follow-up IVUS-CBA-BMS had a significantly lower restenosis rate (6.6%) than Angio-CBA-BMS (17.9%), IVUS-BA-BMS (19.8%) and Angio-BA-BMS (18.2%, p<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Restenosis and TLR were significantly lower in CBA-BMS than BA-BMS. This favorable outcome was achieved because of the lower restenosis rate conferred by the IVUS-guided-CBA-BMS strategy (6.6%). The restenosis rates obtained with this strategy were comparable to those achieved with DES.

Optimization of dose prescription protocol and its impact on delivered dose and vascular response after beta-radiation for in-stent restenosis. A randomized trial with serial volumetric intravascular ultrasound and dose volume histograms

AIM

The incidence of restenosis within stented segment after intravascular brachytherapy with recommended dose prescription protocols is up to 25%. Therefore, we designed a randomized trial comparing recommended dose prescription protocol with dosing adjusted for the source-to-target distance.

METHODS

Fifty-one in-stent restenosis (ISR) lesions in 48 patients underwent centered source beta-irradiation with serial intravascular ultrasound. Patients randomly received 20 Gy at 1 mm either beyond lumen surface [n=25, standard group (S)] or external elastic membrane [n=26, dosing-adjusted (DA) group]. Minimum dose absorbed by 90% of adventitia (DV(90%Adv)) was calculated.

RESULTS

DV(90%Adv) was higher for the DA group than for the S group (21.63+/-5.67 vs. 12.05+/-4.88 Gy, P<.001). After 8.9+/-4.5 months there was complete lumen preservation in DA vs. lumen decrease subsequent to neointimal hyperplasia (NIH) in S group (0.10+/-1.20 vs. -0.61+/-1.29 mm3/mm, P<.05). Vessel volume increased significantly in the DA group and was unchanged in S group (+1.73, P=.002 vs. 0.14 mm3/mm, P=NS). DV(90%Adv) correlated inversely with NIH volume and positively with vessel volume change (r=-.405, P=.007 and r=.363, P=.017, respectively).

CONCLUSION

For beta-irradiation of ISR, dosing adjusted for the source-to-target distance leads to significant increase in target delivered doses, which is associated with complete NIH inhibition and induction of positive vessel remodeling.

Determinants of model of renarrowing after beta radiation for in-stent restenosis

It is unknown whether model of renarrowing after beta-radiation for in-stent restenosis (ISR) is influenced by the type of geographic miss (GM).

METHODS

In 166 ISR treated with Galileo, serial quantitative coronary angiographic analysis was done. Minimal lumen diameters and lengths were measured for (1) stent, (2) peri-stent subsegments subjected to angioplasty with/without irradiation, and (3) irradiation margins. GM was defined as: (Type 1) edge injury within the 32P source dose fall-off: 2.0 mm inside and outside the source end marker or (Type 2) overt, nonirradiated injury: beyond the outer 2.0-mm long dose fall-off zone.

RESULTS

Restenosis rate was 28.3% at 8.9+/-4.5 months with 60% located exclusively outside the stent. Type 1 GM was present in 24.7% of proximal edges, whereas Type 2 in 18.1%. Respective percentages for distal edges were 23.5% and 15.7%. Regardless of presence and type of GM, significant late lumen loss occurred only outside the stent. However, the biggest late lumen loss at the proximal edge was induced by the Type 1 GM (0.65+/-0.79, p<0.001), while proximal Type 2 GM was not associated with edge renarrowing (-0.04+/-0.48, p=NS). Both reference lumen diameter and proximal Type 1 GM influenced restenosis independently (OR 0.47; 95%CI 0.24-0.90; p=0.023 and OR 2.46; 95%CI 1.12-5.40; p=0.025).

CONCLUSIONS

Regardless of presence and type of geographic miss, late lumen loss after beta-radiation occurs only outside the stent. However, injury within the proximal 32P dose fall-off but not overt edge injury is associated with the biggest late lumen loss at the respective edge, triggering recurrent restenosis.

Cutting Balloon: Review on Principles and Background of Use in Peripheral Arteries

This review describes peripheral use of cutting balloon (CB) angioplasty (CBA), its characteristics, and its distinction from conventional BA and describes the experimental and clinical background of its current use in peripheral arteries.

American Society of Diagnostic and Interventional Nephrology Section Editor: Stephen Ash: Cutting Balloon Angioplasty for Resistant Venous Anastomotic Stenoses

Conventional angioplasty of stenoses at the venous anastomosis has been demonstrated to be an important endovascular adjunct to mechanical thrombectomy of clotted arteriovenous dialysis grafts. In some cases, however, severe venous anastomosis stenosis is resistant to angioplasty. Cutting balloon angioplasty may have an advantageous role in these difficult situations in order to avoid surgical revision. In this series of 350 patients receiving percutaneous, endovascular declotting procedures, 9 patients had high-grade venous anastomotic stenoses (opening less than 2 mm) that could not be remedied with either conventional or high-pressure noncompliant peripheral angioplasty balloons. These nine patients had the lesions opened with the use of 4 mm x 10 mm cutting balloons and placement of self-expanding nitinol stents at the venous anastomosis during the same angiography procedure. Patients were followed for patency and functionality of the graft. In all cases, immediate technical success occurred. Among these patients, the vessels have remained patent for as long as 20 months of follow-up and grafts have remained functional. Cutting balloon angioplasty may have a potential therapeutic role in resistant venous anastomotic stenoses.

Incidence, Mechanism, Predictors, and Long-Term Prognosis of Late Stent Malapposition After Bare-Metal Stent Implantation

BACKGROUND

Predictors and long-term prognosis of late stent malapposition (LSM) after bare-metal stent (BMS) implantation are unknown.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We evaluated the incidence, mechanisms, predictors, and long-term prognosis of LSM after BMS implantation in 881 patients (992 native lesions) in whom intravascular ultrasound was performed at index and 6-month follow-up. LSM was defined as a separation of stent struts from the intimal surface of the arterial wall that was not presented at stent implantation. LSM occurred in 54 patients with 54 lesions (5.4% overall); the incidence was 10.3% (9 of 87) after directional coronary atherectomy (DCA) before stenting and 11.5% (11 of 96) after primary stenting in acute myocardial infarction (P=0.031 and P=0.007, respectively, versus elective stenting with conventional balloon pre-dilation, 4.3% [30 of 692]). There was an increase of external elastic membrane area (18.9+/-3.9 to 24.5+/-5.1 mm2, P<0.001) that was greater than the increase in plaque area (9.6+/-3.0 to 11.4+/-2.9 mm2, P<0.001). Independent predictors of LSM were primary stenting in acute myocardial infarction (P=0.023, OR=2.55, 95% CI=1.14 to 5.69) and DCA before stenting (P=0.025, OR=3.02, 95% CI=1.15 to 7.96). There were no significant differences in major adverse cardiac events between LSM and non-LSM groups during mean 3-year follow-up (1.9% versus 1.8%, respectively, P=NS).

CONCLUSIONS

LSM occurs in approximately 5% after BMS implantation. The predictors of LSM are primary stenting in acute myocardial infarction and DCA before stenting. Compared with complete stent apposition at follow-up, LSM after BMS implantation is not associated with any major adverse cardiac events during a mean 3-year follow-up after detection of LSM.

Inadvertent intracoronary stent extraction 10 months after implantation complicating cutting balloon angioplasty for in-stent restenosis

We report the case of an unusual complication for Cutting Balloon Angioplasty (CBA) during treatment for instent restenosis (ISR), which resulted in inadvertent intracoronary stent extraction 10 months after implantation. In this case report, CBA was utilized to treat an ISR lesion in the distal right coronary artery (RCA). Due to difficulty in withdrawing the cutting balloon into the guide after treatment of the lesion, the entire system (guide, cutting balloon, and guidewire) was removed as a unit from the body. Upon examination of the system, the previously placed stent in the distal RCA was attached to the microtomes of the cutting balloon. Although the precise mechanisms for stent extraction in this case remain speculative, the initial stent used in the distal RCA may have been undersized, and this may have played a major role in this complication. Although there is limited data regarding the optimal strategy to treat the site of the inadvertent stent extraction, we opted to re-stent the area with a properly-sized coronary stent. Following the intervention, there was no residual stenosis with TIMI 3 flow through the vessel. The patient remained asymptomatic and a serum troponin drawn 18 hours after the procedure was normal, and he was discharged the next day. The interventionist must be vigilant about this rare but serious complication when applying CBA in the treatment of ISR, particularly when an undersized or underdeployed stent is suspected.