Feasibility and efficacy of tandem positioning on angiographic and clinical outcomes in the Intimal Hyperplasia Inhibition with Beta In-Stent Trial

Brachytherapy for restenosis after stenting for coronary artery disease: its role in the drug-eluting stent era

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Recent years have brought remarkable changes to the field of interventional cardiology. The need for repeat intervention due to restenosis, the most vexing long-term failure of percutaneous coronary intervention, has been significantly reduced owing to the introduction of two major advances, the vascular brachytherapy (VBT) and the drug-eluting stents (DES).

RECENT FINDINGS

Vascular brachytherapy has demonstrated its efficacy in limiting recurrence of existing in-stent restenosis. The past 2 years have sealed its reputation, with a variety of studies demonstrating its superiority over conventional therapy in challenging patient subsets with high risk for restenosis recurrence. Moreover, the long-term follow-up confirmed durability of this therapy, and the failures of VBT were characterized as easy to treat. Conversely, DES have shown spectacular efficacy at primarily preventing the first restenosis episode following the initial stent placement. Consequently, the role of VBT may be minimized, as the overall need for repeat revascularization is diminished as a result of the wide acceptance of DES. Furthermore, if the capacity of DES to treat in-stent restenosis is confirmed in randomized trials, they may eventually supersede VBT as the therapy of choice for in-stent restenosis.

SUMMARY

At present, VBT is the proven and durable therapeutic choice for patients with complex, diffuse in-stent restenosis who would otherwise have a very poor prognosis for long-term event-free survival. DES have emerged as remarkably effective in minimizing the first restenosis occurrence; they also represent a promising and competitive alternative to VBT for the treatment of in-stent restenosis.

Comparison of the angiographic outcomes after beta versus gamma vascular brachytherapy for treatment of in-stent restenosis

This study was designed to compare the angiographic outcomes of beta versus gamma vascular brachytherapy (VBT). We reviewed the angiographic results of 636 lesions (212 that underwent beta and 212 that underwent gamma VBT, and 212 that received placebo) with native coronary in-stent restenosis matched for lesion length, vessel size, preprocedure minimum lumen diameter (MLD), and time to angiographic follow-up in the various randomized clinical trials and studies. Baseline lesion complexity was similar in these 3 groups. Final MLD was smaller in the beta VBT group than in the gamma VBT or placebo group. At follow-up, beta and gamma VBT significantly reduced both angiographic restenosis (34.4% for beta VBT, 26.4% for gamma VBT, and 50.9% in the placebo group; p <0.0001) and recurrent lesion length (9.2 mm for beta VBT, 8.4 mm for gamma VBT, and 15.5 mm placebo, p <0.0001) compared with placebo. Gamma VBT was associated with a greater reduction in restenosis outside the stent than beta VBT. By multivariable analysis, independent angiographic predictors of treated segment restenosis included beta or gamma VBT, lesion length, and vessel size. In matched lesions, beta and gamma VBT achieved similar reductions in treated segment restenosis and recurrent lesion length compared with placebo.