Usefulness of intravenous diltiazem in predicting subsequent electrophysiologic and clinical responses to oral diltiazem

Clinical Experience with Diltiazem in the Treatment of Cardiovascular Diseases

Abstract

Cardiovascular diseases are the leading cause of death in the world. Coronary artery diseases, atrial fibrillation or hypertensive heart disease, are among the most important cardiovascular disorders. Hypertension represents a significant risk factor for cardiovascular mortality; thus, control of high blood pressure has become a priority to prevent major complications. Although the choice of drugs for treating hypertension remains controversial, extensive clinical evidences point to calcium channel blockers as first-line agents. Diltiazem, a non-dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker, is an effective and safe antihypertensive drug, alone or in combination with other agents. Diltiazem lowers myocardial oxygen demand through a reduction in heart rate, blood pressure, and cardiac contractility, representing also a good alternative for the treatment of stable chronic angina. Furthermore, diltiazem reduces conduction in atrioventricular node, which is also useful for heart rate control in patients with atrial fibrillation. In this review, clinical experts highlight studies on diltiazem effectiveness and safety for the treatment of several cardiovascular diseases and make evidence-based recommendations regarding the management of diltiazem in the clinical practice.

Funding

Lacer Spain.

Effects of verapamil on electrophysiological properties in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation

Verapamil is used to control ventricular response during atrial fibrillation (AF). Limited data is available on the effects of verapamil on atrial vulnerability in human AF. The effects of intravenous verapamil (0.15 mg/kg) on electrophysiological properties of the atrium were investigated in 12 patients with documented paroxysmal AF by electrophysiological studies. Sinus cycle length, sinus node recovery time, and the effective refractory period of the right atrium were not significantly affected by verapamil. The intraatrial conduction delay zone was significantly increased (33 +/- 20 msec before verapamil versus 50 +/- 22 msec after verapamil, P < 0.01), and the maximal intraatrial conduction delay was also significantly prolonged by verapamil, both to the His bundle region (30 +/- 12 msec before verapamil versus 42 +/- 15 msec after verapamil, P < 0.01) and to the coronary sinus (40 +/- 15 msec before verapamil versus 53 +/- 17 msec after verapamil, P < 0.01). The fragmented atrial activity zone was significantly increased (15 +/- 14 msec before verapamil versus 25 +/- 22 msec after verapamil, P < 0.02), and the percentile fragmented atrial activity was also significantly increased by verapamil (149 +/- 18 msec before verapamil versus 174 +/- 44 msec after verapamil, P < 0.05). The repetitive atrial firing zone remained unchanged. Sustained AF spontaneously occurred in only one patient after the administration of verapamil. Thus, verapamil may modulate the abnormal atrial electrophysiology in paroxysmal AF, and would favor production of atrial reentry.

Acute conversion of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia with intravenous diltiazem. IV Diltiazem Study Group

Diltiazem has electrophysiologic effects similar to those of verapamil. Its efficacy and safety in 4 doses for treatment of induced supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) were examined and compared with those of placebo in 87 patients (25 with atrioventricular [AV] nodal reentry tachycardia, 60 with AV reentry associated with an accessory AV connection, and 2 with atrial tachycardia). Conversion to sinus rhythm occurred in 4 of 14 patients (29%) with 0.05 mg/kg of diltiazem, 16 of 19 (84%) with 0.15 mg/kg, 13 of 13 (100%) with 0.25 mg/kg, and 14 of 17 (82%) with 0.45 mg/kg compared with 6 of 24 (25%) treated with placebo. Conversion rates in groups receiving doses of 0.15 to 0.45 mg/kg of diltiazem were superior to that in the placebo group (p less than 0.001). Time to conversion was 3.0 +/- 2.6 minutes in responding diltiazem patients compared with 5.9 +/- 6.1 minutes in responding control patients. Diltiazem administration resulted in significant lengthening of SVT cycle length, AH interval, and AV nodal effective refractory period and block cycle length. The most frequent adverse response to diltiazem was hypotension (7 of 63 patients); however, only 4 patients had symptoms related to hypotension. Thus, intravenous diltiazem in doses of 0.15, 0.25 and 0.45 mg/kg is an effective and safe treatment for the acute management of SVT.

Efficacy and safety of intravenous diltiazem for treatment of atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter. The Diltiazem-Atrial Fibrillation/Flutter Study Group

This study evaluates the effectiveness and safety of intravenous diltiazem for the treatment of atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter. A double-blind, parallel, randomized, placebo-controlled protocol was used, and 6 large, urban hospitals, both university-affiliated and private, participated. The study involved 113 patients with atrial fibrillation or flutter, a ventricular rate greater than or equal to 120 beats/min and systolic blood pressure greater than or equal to 90 mm Hg without severe heart failure. The dose of intravenous diltiazem (or identical placebo) was 0.25 mg/kg/2 minutes followed 15 minutes later by 0.35 mg/kg/2 minutes if the first dose was tolerated but ineffective. If a patient did not respond, the code was broken and the patient was allowed to receive open-label diltiazem if placebo had been given. Of 56 patients, 42 (75%) randomized to receive diltiazem responded to 0.25 mg/kg and 10 of 14 responded to 0.35 mg/kg, for a total response rate of 52 of 56 patients (93%), whereas 7 of 57 patients (12%) responded to placebo (p less than 0.001). After the double-blind protocol, 49 of the 57 patients who received placebo were then given diltiazem; 47 of 49 responded, for an overall response rate of 99 of 105 patients (94%) with diltiazem. The median time from the start of drug infusion to the maximal decrease in heart rate was 4.3 minutes. Side effects occurred in 14 patients, 7 of whom had asymptomatic hypotension not requiring intervention. Thus, intravenous diltiazem was rapidly effective for slowing the ventricular response in most patients with atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter. Blood pressure decreased slightly. Side effects were mild.

Intravenous diltiazem for termination of reentrant supraventricular tachycardia: a placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind, multicenter study

To assess the efficacy and safety of intravenous diltiazem, 54 patients with inducible sustained supraventricular tachycardia received diltiazem, 0.25 mg/kg or 0.25 mg/kg, followed by 0.35 mg/kg body weight, or placebo in a double-blind, randomized study. Twenty patients had atrioventricular (AV) node reentrant tachycardia, whereas 34 had orthodromic AV reciprocating tachycardia associated with the Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome. Supraventricular tachycardia was terminated in 24 (86%) of 28 patients given intravenous diltiazem compared with 5 (19%) of 26 given placebo (p = 0.0000014). Nineteen (95%) of 20 patients initially given placebo had termination of supraventricular tachycardia after receiving diltiazem. Overall, 43 (90%) of 48 patients receiving intravenous diltiazem had conversion of supraventricular tachycardia to sinus rhythm; the median time to tachycardia termination was 2 min after initiation of a 2 min diltiazem infusion. All 20 patients (100%) with AV node reentrant tachycardia treated with diltiazem had conversion of tachycardia to sinus rhythm as did 26 (81%) of 30 patients with AV reciprocating tachycardia treated with diltiazem. Diltiazem prolonged refractoriness and slowed conduction of the AV node and thereby provided antiarrhythmic action to cause tachycardia termination. Diltiazem had no effect on the electrophysiologic properties of accessory AV connections. Adverse effects were seen in 3 (6%) of the 48 patients given diltiazem. For paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia initiated in the electrophysiology laboratory, it is concluded that intravenous diltiazem is safe and very effective for acute tachycardia termination when the AV node is part of the reentrant circuit.

An interindividual variability in the sensitivity of atrioventricular node to diltiazem in patients with paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia

To study the sensitivity of atrioventricular (AV) node to diltiazem in seven patients with paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (PSVT), we analyzed the plasma concentration-response relationship of this Ca-antagonist using AH interval as an index for assessing its Ca channel blocking effect on the AV node after an IV infusion (0.4 mg/kg). The postdose AH intervals were prolonged compared with the baseline, and their percentage changes correlated significantly (P less than 0.01) with log-diltiazem concentrations in all patients. However, drug concentrations associated with a 20% prolongation of AH interval differed considerably among the patients (range; 65 to 260 ng/ml), indicating a large interindividual variability in the sensitivity of AV node to diltiazem. These results suggest that the interindividual difference in the responsiveness of AV node to diltiazem-induced Ca channel blocking effect may be one of the possible explanations for the therapeutic failure of this Ca-antagonist for terminating PSVT or preventing its recurrences in certain patients.

Effect of intravenous and oral calcium antagonists (diltiazem and verapamil) on sustenance of atrial fibrillation

Both verapamil and diltiazem are used to control ventricular response during atrial fibrillation (AF). Their effect on the maintenance of AF is not known. The effects of the intravenous and oral administration of verapamil and diltiazem were investigated in 35 patients, 18 with (group I) and 17 without (group II) documented paroxysmal AF. Programmed electrical stimulation, either extra-stimuli or burst atrial pacing, was used to induce AF. In group I, the mean values of the duration of AF before and after the intravenous and oral administration of the calcium antagonists were 31 +/- 12, 112 +/- 49 and 69 +/- 25 minutes, respectively. For group II, the values were 5 +/- 3.4, 39 +/- 13 and 14 +/- 7 minutes, respectively. The differences were statistically highly significant (p less than 0.001), after both oral and intravenous administration compared with the baseline value in both groups. The data suggest that both intravenously and orally administered calcium antagonists enhance sustenance of electrically induced AF, especially in patients with spontaneous arrhythmia. Thus, in patients with paroxysmal AF, verapamil or diltiazem should be administered cautiously, because these drugs may prolong the duration of arrhythmia. Further studies are warranted to investigate the role of calcium antagonists in spontaneously occurring paroxysmal AF.

Calcium channel antagonists. Part III: Use and comparative efficacy in hypertension and supraventricular arrhythmias. Minor indications

The major antihypertensive mechanism of calcium antagonists is by decreasing the systemic vascular resistance, modified by the counter-regulatory responses of the baroreflexes and the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system. In severe hypertension, the concept that calcium overload of the vascular myocyte could precipitate or aggravate peripheral vasoconstriction provides a logical basis for the use of these agents as first choice therapy; nifedipine, especially, has been well tested. As monotherapy for mild to moderate hypertension each of the three first-generation agents compares well with beta-blockers. Calcium antagonists may have a special role in the therapy of certain patient groups (elderly, black) or in those subjects whose life style involves intense physical or mental exertion (hemodynamics better maintained than with beta-blockade) or in patients with early end-organ damage such as left ventricular hypertrophy or renal insufficiency. However, the goal blood pressure may not be reached during monotherapy so that drug combinations may be required. Further indications for these compounds are as follows. Verapamil and diltiazem are frequently used in supraventricular tachycardias including acute and chronic atrial fibrillation. In the arrhythmias of the Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome, there is the potential danger of provocation of anterograde conduction. Further indications for calcium antagonists, still under evaluation, include congestive heart failure (controversial), hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (verapamil), primary pulmonary hypertension (high doses required), Raynaud's phenomenon (nifedipine and diltiazem effective), peripheral vascular disease (proof not yet documented), cerebral insufficiency and subarachnoid hemorrhage (nimodipine promising), migraine, exertional bronchospasm, renal disease, atherosclerosis (experimental), and primary aldosteronism (nifedipine inhibits aldosterone release). Second-generation agents include dihydropyridines, such as nitrendipine, nicardipine, felodipine, amlodipine, nisoldipine, nimodipine, and isradipine. From these will be selected agents that are longer acting and provide higher vascular selectivity. New preparations of existing agents include slow-release formulations of nifedipine, verapamil, and diltiazem. Minor side effects include those caused by vasodilation (flushing and headaches), constipation (verapamil), and ankle edema. Serious side effects are rare and result from improper use of these agents, as when intravenous verapamil is given to patients with sinus or atrioventricular nodal depression from drugs or disease, or nifedipine to patients with aortic stenosis. The potential of a marked negative inotropic effect is usually offset by afterload reduction, especially in the case of nifedipine. Yet caution is required when calcium antagonists, especially verapamil, are given to patients with myocardial failure unless caused by hypertensive heart disease. Drug interactions of calcium antagonists occur with other cardiovascular agents such as alpha-adrenergic blockers, beta-adrenergic blockers, digoxin, quinidine, and disopyramide.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

The effects of slow channel blockers and beta blockers on atrioventricular nodal conduction

The PR interval on the electrocardiogram represents the time that it takes an impulse to travel through the atrium and atrioventricular (AV) conduction system to the ventricles. Normally, activation is slowest in the AV node, and variations in PR interval most commonly parallel changes in AV nodal activation time. The AV nodal conduction time and effective refractory period are rate dependent and, in adult humans, are usually prolonged with increasing atrial paced rates. In addition, alterations in autonomic tone effect AV nodal conduction as well as sinus rate. The effect is usually in the same direction but often to different degrees. In patients with normal AV nodal function, parasympathetic and sympathetic tone are balanced at rest, but in patients with abnormal AV conduction, the effect of the parasympathetic system is more marked. Drugs including the slow channel blockers and beta blockers, affect AV nodal function. Slow channel blockers inhibit the slow inward calcium current, which may prolong conduction and refractoriness in the AV node. However, whereas diltiazem and verapamil have been shown to prolong AV nodal conduction and refractoriness in humans, nifedipine, a potent vasodilator, cannot be used in doses large enough to affect the AV node. The increase in PR interval caused by verapamil is minimal, and at doses of less than 480 mg/d, AV block occurs infrequently. When AV block occurs, it is first degree block in most patients, and it is usually asymptomatic. The electrophysiologic effects of diltiazem are similar to those of verapamil. Beta blockers also have a negative dromotropic effect on the AV node. They prolong the AH interval and AV nodal refractory periods and may lengthen the PR interval. The prolonged PR interval rarely results in more than first degree AV block in patients receiving maintenance therapy. In selected patients, combination therapy with a slow channel blocker and a beta blocker rarely causes second-degree AV block.

Calcium modulators: future agents, future uses

The calcium modulators have been a significant therapeutic advancement for the treatment of angina. Structural analogs of verapamil and nifedipine have been synthesized, as have structurally unique compounds. As the role of calcium in body processes is further elucidated, the efficacy of the calcium modulators is being evaluated for numerous disorders. It is anticipated that the newly synthesized compounds will have specificity toward particular body processes, thus providing efficacy with minimal side effects.

Efficacy and safety of intravenous and oral diltiazem for Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome

The electrophysiologic effects and safety of diltiazem administered either intravenously or orally were studied in 14 patients with Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome during orthodromic reentrant tachycardia and atrial fibrillation (AF). Anterograde and retrograde effective refractory periods of the accessory pathway did not change significantly from baseline during either i.v. or oral administration. Administration by either route prevented induction of sustained reentrant tachycardia in 8 patients. In 6 patients, the reentrant tachycardia was either nonsustained (2 patients) or sustained at much slower rates than the baseline rates (mean +/- standard deviation, baseline, 290 +/- 41 ms; i.v., 355 +/- 40 ms [p less than 0.001]; and oral, 377 +/- 33 ms [p less than 0.001]). In these patients anterograde atrioventricular conduction was prolonged significantly from the mean baseline value of 163 +/- 36 ms to 212 +/- 35 ms with i.v. administration (p less than 0.005) and 225 +/- 33 ms with oral administration (p less than 0.005). Retrograde conduction via the accessory pathway did not change significantly after administration of diltiazem. The shortest preexcited RR intervals during AF were significantly reduced during i.v. but not during oral administration: control, 327 +/- 47 ms; i.v., 270 +/- 28 ms (p less than 0.001); and oral, 323 +/- 44 ms (difference not significant). In 5 patients AF was sustained for a mean of 20 minutes after i.v. and for 12 minutes after oral administration (p less than 0.20), compared with a baseline mean value of 0.83 minute.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamic effects of aqueous diltiazem in healthy humans

Aqueous diltiazem was given to ten healthy male volunteers in a single oral dose of 2.5 mg/kg body weight. Serum diltiazem levels were measured at various intervals up to 24 hours after administration of the drug as were blood pressure, heart rate, and PR interval. The pharmacokinetics followed a one-compartment model in six and two-compartment model in four subjects. The mean distribution half-life in the latter four subjects was 15.8 +/- 3.7 minutes (range, 10.4-18.8 min). In the ten subjects, the peak serum diltiazem level was attained in 20 to 45 minutes (mean, 32.5 +/- 9.5 min) and ranged from 136 to 701 ng/mL (mean, 332 +/- 180 ng/mL). The elimination half-life ranged from 2.8 to 4.8 hours (mean, 3.8 +/- 0.6 hr). The area under the concentration-time curve varied from 508 to 2,245 ng-hr/mL, indicating differing bioavailability. Slight but significant blood pressure reduction was seen only at one to three hours. Changes in heart rate were not significant at any measurement. Transient facial flushing, beginning at ten to 20 minutes after administration, was noted in nine subjects, reflecting the vasodilatory effect of the drug. Significant prolongation (greater than 10%) of PR intervals began at ten minutes in three, at 20 minutes in six, and at 30 minutes in one participant, and progressed to second-degree Wenckebach atrioventricular (AV) block in six subjects 20 to 60 minutes after administration and third-degree AV block in one person 45 minutes after dosing. These AV blocks resolved by the third hour without treatment, and PR prolongation resolved by the fifth to seventh hours.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Use of calcium antagonists for cardiac arrhythmias

Calcium antagonists have emerged as a new class of antiarrhythmic agents for the control of certain supraventricular and ventricular arrhythmias. Electrophysiologically, these agents are heterogeneous but their main action is mediated through a depressant effect on the slow calcium channel in cardiac muscle, most readily demonstrated in isolated tissue preparations. In vivo, their actions are modulated by their reflex actions and by their interaction with the autonomic nervous system due to the noncompetitive adrenergic-blocking actions that some of the compounds exhibit. The major agents exerting antiarrhythmic actions are verapamil, diltiazem, gallopamil, tiapamil and bepridil; the dihydropyridines are devoid of electrophysiologic actions in vivo. Calcium antagonists prolong intranodal conduction time, lengthen the effective and functional refractory periods in the atrioventricular node but exert little or no effect on atrial, ventricular, His-Purkinje or bypass tract conduction or refractoriness (except in the case of bepridil, which has additional electrophysiologic properties). These effects form the basis of the clinical antiarrhythmic effects of this class of agents. The most striking action is the predictable and prompt termination of the reentrant supraventricular tachycardia by intravenous verapamil and diltiazem and the slowing of the ventricular response in atrial flutter and fibrillation. These agents may also be of value in the long-term control of ventricular response in atrial flutter and fibrillation; their role in multifocal atrial tachycardia and other ectopic tachycardias is less well defined. Calcium antagonists reverse ischemic ventricular arrhythmias caused by coronary artery spasm but exert little or no action in the usual forms of sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias associated with severe structural heart disease. They are poor suppressants of ventricular premature complexes. Recent data have established their role in exercise-induced tachycardia occurring in the context of ischemic heart disease; they are also of value in ventricular tachycardia occurring in young patients who develop tachycardia with a right bundle branch block and left axis deviation morphology, an arrhythmia thought to be due to triggered automaticity.