Influence of acute myocardial infarction location on in-hospital and late outcome after primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty versus tissue plasminogen activator therapy

Left ventricular shape and function in primary coronary angioplasty

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effects of primary coronary angioplasty (PCA) on regional left ventricular (LV) contractile dysfunction and deformation, and on global remodeling.

METHODS

In 99 consecutive patients (81 males, aged 61+/-11 years) who underwent successful PCA of left anterior descending (LAD) and right coronary (RCA) arteries for treatment of first myocardial infarction and completed a hemodynamic follow-up at 1 and 6 months, LV eccentricity and circularity indexes, centreline wall motion and regional curvature were analyzed. Asynergy and akinesia were defined as centreline impairment </=-1 and </=-2 standard deviations, respectively, while the injury area was identified as the area of wall motion impairment subtended by sharp changes in curvature. Wall motion normalization (>-1 standard deviation) at 6 months was used to categorize the outcome as improved.

RESULTS

Systolic deformation and impairment of regional LV function soon after LAD and RCA occlusion closely resembled those of the chronic myocardial infarction. PCA improved regional contractility in all patients, due to early salvage of the epicardial injured myocardium, and at least in two fifths of patients the injury area magnitude reduced by improvement of the ischemic boundaries of the infarct. Irrespective of either persistently impaired or normalized regional contractility, LV shape remained abnormal. In contract to the persistence of local deformation, global remodeling was observed in patients categorized as the highest end-diastolic volume quartile at presentation who had greater myocardial damage.

CONCLUSION

Regional contractility impairment induced by acute myocardial infarction can be reverted by PCA, but systolic shape deformation persists over time.

The impact of percutaneous coronary interventions on outcomes for acute myocardial infarction in Pennsylvania

This research estimates the benefits associated with percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) for patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) treated at hospitals in Pennsylvania. We studied 31 351 patients with AMI in Pennsylvania during the year 2000, including 10 170 who received PCI. Univariate comparisons between groups were made using chi2 tests for categorical outcomes and Student's t tests for continuous outcomes. A logit model for proportions was used to model the relationship between mortality and the proportion of AMI patients who received PCI. The mortality rate for patients undergoing PCI was significantly lower than for those being treated medically (1.4% vs 15.8%, P<.0001). Furthermore, significant survival benefits associated with PCI persisted when patients were stratified by age, sex, type of infarction, and severity at admission. At the hospital level, higher rates of PCI were associated with a significantly lower overall mortality rate among patients with AMI (P<.0001).

Comparative early and late outcomes after primary percutaneous coronary intervention in ST-segment elevation and non-ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction (from the CADILLAC trial)

We determined the outcomes of patients with acute ST-segment elevation (STE) myocardial infarction (STEMI) and non-STEMI (NSTEMI) after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The prognosis after primary PCI in STEMI has been extensively studied and defined. Outcomes of patients who undergo primary PCI for NSTEMI are less well established. In total, 2,082 patients with ongoing chest pain for > 30 minutes consistent with acute MI were randomized to balloon angioplasty versus stenting, each with/without abciximab. Of 1,964 patients, STEMI was present in 1,725 (87.8%) and NSTEMI in 239 (12.2%). Compared with STEMI, those with NSTEMI were more likely to have delayed time-to-hospital arrival (2.4 vs 1.8 hours, p = 0.0002) and increased door-to-balloon time (3.2 vs 1.9 hours, p < 0.0001). Patients with NSTEMI were more likely to have Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction grade 3 flow at baseline (37.3% vs 19.4%, p < 0.0001) and higher ejection fraction (58.7% vs 55.8%, p = 0.001), but similar rates of postprocedural Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction grade 3 flow. At 1 year, patients with NTEMI had similar mortality (3.4% vs 4.4%, p = 0.40) but higher rates of major adverse cardiac events (24.0% vs 16.6%, p = 0.007) that was driven by more frequent ischemic target vessel revascularization (21.8% vs 11.9%, p <0.0001). In conclusion, patients with acute MI without STE who are treated with primary PCI have marked delays to treatment, similar late mortality, and increased rates of ischemic target vessel revascularization compared with patients with STEMI, despite more favorable angiographic features at presentation and similar reperfusion success. The adverse prognosis of patients with NSTEMI should be recognized and efforts made to decrease reperfusion times.

Early management of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

Improvements in the management of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction(STEMI) have led to a reduction in the acute and long-term mortality rates. The first important decision in the care of patients who have STEMI is the method of reperfusion. Whether percutaneous intervention (PCI) or fibrinolytic therapy is chosen depends on a number of factors. This article reviews the data on PCI and fibrinolytics in the context of consensus guidelines, outlines adjunctive medical therapies important in the first 24 hours, and discusses a strategy for making the decisions and a hypothetical construct for evaluating new drugs and procedures in the future.

Combined Angioplasty and Pharmacological Intervention Versus Thrombolysis Alone in Acute Myocardial Infarction (CAPITAL AMI Study)

OBJECTIVES

We compared a strategy of tenecteplase (TNK)-facilitated angioplasty with one of TNK alone in patients presenting with high-risk ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).

BACKGROUND

Previous trials show that thrombolysis followed by immediate angioplasty for the treatment of STEMI does not improve ischemic outcomes compared with thrombolysis alone and is associated with excessive bleeding complications. Since the publication of these trials, however, significant pharmacological and technological advances have occurred.

METHODS

We randomized 170 patients with high-risk STEMI to treatment with TNK alone (84 patients) or TNK-facilitated angioplasty (86 patients). The primary end point was a composite of death, reinfarction, recurrent unstable ischemia, or stroke at six months.

RESULTS

At six months, the incidence of the primary end point was 24.4% in the TNK-alone group versus 11.6% in the TNK-facilitated angioplasty group (p = 0.04). This difference was driven by a reduction in the rate of recurrent unstable ischemia (20.7% vs. 8.1%, p = 0.03). There was a trend toward a lower reinfarction rate with TNK-facilitated angioplasty (14.6% vs. 5.8%, p = 0.07). No significant differences were observed in the rates of death or stroke. Major bleeding was observed in 7.1% of the TNK-alone group and in 8.1% of the TNK-facilitated angioplasty group (p = 1.00).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients presenting with high-risk STEMI, TNK plus immediate angioplasty reduced the risk of recurrent ischemic events compared with TNK alone and was not associated with an increase in major bleeding complications.

Impact of normalized myocardial perfusion after successful angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction

OBJECTIVES

We sought to evaluate and validate the ability of the angiographic myocardial blush grade to risk stratify patients after successful angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction (AMI).

BACKGROUND

Although epicardial Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI)-3 flow is restored in >90% of patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), normal myocardial perfusion may be present less frequently and may detrimentally impact survival.

METHODS

A cohort of 173 consecutive patients undergoing intervention within 24 h of AMI onset were studied. High-risk features of this population included failed thrombolysis in 39%, cardiogenic shock in 17% and saphenous vein graft culprit in 11% of patients.

RESULTS

Despite the restoration of TIMI-3 flow in 163 (94.2%) patients, myocardial perfusion, as evidenced by normal contrast opacification of the myocardial bed subtended by the infarct artery (myocardial blush), was normal in only 29.4% of patients with TIMI-3 flow following PCI, and in no patient with TIMI 0 to 2 flow. In patients in whom TIMI-3 flow was restored, survival was strongly dependent on the myocardial perfusion grade; one-year cumulative mortality was 6.8% with normal myocardial blush, 13.2% with reduced myocardial blush and 18.3% in patients with absent myocardial blush (p = 0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

Abnormal myocardial perfusion is present in most patients following primary or rescue PCI in AMI, despite restoration of brisk epicardial coronary flow. In high risk patients achieving TIMI-3 flow after intervention, the myocardial blush score may be used to stratify prognosis into excellent, intermediate and poor survival. Further study is warranted to examine whether adjunctive mechanical or pharmacologic strategies can further improve myocardial perfusion and survival of patients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing intervention.

Alteplase: descendancy in myocardial infarction, ascendancy in stroke

Tissue type plasminogen activator is available, through recombinant technology, for thrombolytic use as alteplase. Alteplase is relatively clot specific and should cause less bleeding side effects than the non-specific agents such as streptokinase. Alteplase has been used successfully in evolving myocardial infarction (MI) to reopen occluded coronary arteries. It is probably equally effective or superior to streptokinase in opening arteries and reducing mortality in MI. Alteplase is most effective when given early in MI and is probably ineffective when given 12 h after the onset of symptoms. The effectiveness of alteplase in MI can be increased by front loading with a bolus of 15 mg, followed by an infusion of 50 mg over 30 min and 35 mg over 60 min. Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty or stenting is associated with a greater patency and lower rates of serious bleeding, recurrent ischaemia and death than alteplase in MI and is likely to take over from alteplase as the standard MI treatment. A reduced dose of alteplase to increase coronary artery patency prior to angioplasty may be useful in MI. An exciting new indication for the use of alteplase is in stroke, where it has become the first beneficial intervention. Alteplase is used to reopen occluded cerebral vessels but is associated with an increased risk of intracerebral haemorrhage. Alteplase is beneficial if given within 3 h of the onset of stroke but not after this time period. Therefore, the next challenge is to increase the percentage of people being diagnosed and treated within this period. Clinical trials have not established a role for alteplase in the treatment of acute coronary syndromes or deep vein thrombosis. However, alteplase is useful in treating pulmonary thromboembolism and peripheral vascular disease.

Does primary stenting preserve cardiac function in myocardial infarction? A case-control study. NORTH-981 investigators. Network of revascularisation therapy in Hokkaido

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether coronary stenting limits myocardial injury and preserves left ventricular function.

DESIGN AND SETTING

Prospective multicentre case-control study of primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) with and without stenting, performed in seven cardiovascular centres.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

45 consecutive patients with acute myocardial infarction who were treated with successful primary stenting (Stent group) and did not have restenosis were paired with 45 matched control subjects with acute myocardial infarction treated by successful primary PTCA without stenting, also with no restenosis (POBA group).

RESULTS

In comparison with the POBA group, the Stent group-especially those patients with a left anterior descending coronary artery lesion-had a smaller hypokinesis area (mean (SD): 15. 1 (20.0) v 34.4 (24.3) chords), reduced hypokinesis area/risk area (25.2 (31.9)% v 58.8 (40.1)%), and a larger ejection fraction (63.3 (10.2)% v 51.7 (11.7)%) evaluated by quantitative left ventriculography using the centerline method. In the Stent group, the correlation between risk area and hypokinesis area was significantly shifted downward. Multiple logistic regression analysis on infarct size limitation (hypokinesis area/risk area < 50%) identified preinfarction angina in all subjects and preinfarction angina and stenting in patients with left anterior descending coronary artery lesions as explanatory factors.

CONCLUSIONS

Primary PTCA using a coronary stent is effective in preventing myocardial injury and restoring left ventricular function in patients with anterior acute myocardial infarction.

The consequences and opportunities of shortened lengths of stay for cardiovascular patients

Length of hospitalization for many cardiovascular conditions has decreased dramatically recently. Many attribute this increase to the cost constraints imposed by managed care and to improved technologies. Although technological developments have contributed to cost inflation, they have also reduced the need for long hospitalizations and improved patient outcomes. This new context for delivering cardiovascular services is discussed in terms of the challenges and opportunities for nursing leadership in several aspects of care.

Update on mechanical revascularization in acute myocardial infarction: which role and when?

Mechanical revascularization in the acute myocardial infarction by primary angioplasty has several advantages over thrombolytic therapy. The short-term patency rates of the infarct-related artery range from 95 to 99% and a normal flow is achieved in more than 90% of the cases. This prompt and effective reperfusion is probably responsible for the improved prognosis with primary angioplasty. The better outcome after primary angioplasty is observed both in low- and in high-risk patients, in all ages and in patients presenting late (>6 h) after the chest pain. Pooled analysis of randomized studies, show that primary angioplasty as compared to thrombolysis, has a lower incidence of death, stroke and reinfarction. Additional advantages of primary PTCA include the possibility of reperfusion in patients in whom lysis is contraindicated or less effective (e.g. patients in cardiogenic shock, or with prior coronary artery bypass surgery) and the ability to provide prognostic information helpful in the patient triage. Thus, primary PTCA results in better outcome than thrombolysis when performed in centers with success rates comparable to those achieved in the randomized trials. Further studies are still needed to assess its long-term efficacy. Several randomized trials are underway to assess the role of stents and the use of more potent antiplatelet drugs, as the GPIIb/IIIa receptor blockers, in adjunct to balloon angioplasty in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction.

Primary angioplasty versus systemic thrombolysis in anterior myocardial infarction

OBJECTIVES

This study compares the efficacy of primary angioplasty and systemic thrombolysis with t-PA in reducing the in-hospital mortality of patients with anterior AMI.

BACKGROUND

Controversy still exists about the relative benefit of primary angioplasty over thrombolysis as treatment for AMI.

METHODS

Two-hundred and twenty patients with anterior AMI were randomly assigned in our institution to primary angioplasty (109 patients) or systemic thrombolysis with accelerated t-PA (111 patients) within the first five hours from the onset of symptoms.

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics were similar in both groups. Primary angioplasty was independently associated with a lower in-hospital mortality (2.8% vs. 10.8%, p = 0.02, adjusted odds ratio 0.23, 95% confidence interval 0.06 to 0.85). During hospitalization, patients treated by angioplasty had a lower frequency of postinfarction angina or positive stress test (11.9% vs. 25.2%, p = 0.01) and less frequently underwent percutaneous or surgical revascularization after the initial treatment (22.0% vs. 47.7%, p < 0.001) than did patients treated by t-PA. At six month follow-up, patients treated by angioplasty had a lower cumulative rate of death (4.6% vs. 11.7%, p = 0.05) and revascularization (31.2% vs. 55.9%, p < 0.001) than those treated by t-PA.

CONCLUSIONS

In centers with an experienced and readily available interventional team, primary angioplasty is superior to t-PA for the treatment of anterior AMI.

Comparison of thrombolytic therapy and primary coronary angioplasty with liberal stenting for inferior myocardial infarction with precordial ST-segment depression: immediate and long-term results of a randomized study

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the study was to compare randomly assigned primary angioplasty and accelerated recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA), in patients with "high-risk" inferior acute myocardial infarction (ST-segment elevation in the inferior leads and ST-segment depression in the precordial leads).

BACKGROUND

The ST-segment depression in the precordial leads is a marker of severe prognosis in patients with inferior myocardial infarction. The comparative outcome of treatment with primary angioplasty or lysis with accelerated rt-PA has not been investigated.

METHODS

One hundred and ten patients within 6 h of symptoms were randomized to either treatment. To assess the in-hospital and 1-year outcome of both treatments the following results were compared: death or nonfatal infarction, recurrence of angina, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and the need for repeat target vessel revascularization (TVR).

RESULTS

In patients treated with angioplasty (55) and rt-PA (55) the rate of in-hospital mortality and reinfarction was 3.6% versus 9.1% (p=0.4). Recurrence of angina was 1.8% versus 20% (p=0.002), new TVR was used in 3.6% versus 29.1% (p=0.0003), and the LVEF (%) at discharge was 55.2+/-9.5 versus 48.2+/-9.9 (p=0.0001). There were no hemorrhagic strokes, no emergency coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) and identical (5.5%) need for blood transfusions. At 1 year, the incidence of death, reinfarction or repeat TVR was 11% in the percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) group versus 52.7% in the rt-PA group (log-rank 22.38, p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Primary angioplasty is superior to accelerated rt-PA in terms of both myocardial preservation and reduction of in-hospital complications in patients with inferior myocardial infarction and precordial ST-segment depression. Primary angioplasty also yields a better long-term event-free survival.

Revisiting reperfusion therapy in inferior myocardial infarction

Although thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction (MI) is recommended without regard for infarct location, treatment results are less impressive for inferior than for anterior MI because the amount of myocardium at risk is smaller and less strategically located, and the mortality risk is lower. Whereas the risks associated with anterior MI are relatively constant, high risk subsets of patients with an inferior MI can be identified by simple electrocardiographic criteria, including left precordial ST segment depression, complete atrioventricular heart block and right precordial ST segment elevation. Unfortunately, none of the placebo-controlled, randomized trials have analyzed the benefit of thrombolytic therapy for inferior MI in high risk versus low risk subsets. Thrombolytic therapy should be more successful in reducing infarct size and decreasing mortality in high risk patients with an inferior MI. Thrombolytic therapy may not decrease hospital mortality in low risk patients (baseline risk 2% to 4%) or those with symptom duration > 6 h. Whereas it is arguable whether coronary angioplasty is superior to thrombolytic therapy in anterior MI, there are no mortality data to support using angioplasty as a primary or rescue reperfusion strategy instead of thrombolytic therapy in inferior MI, unless thrombolytic contraindications are present or the patient is in cardiogenic shock.

Analysis of the relative costs and effectiveness of primary angioplasty versus tissue-type plasminogen activator: the Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction (PAMI) trial. The PAMI Trial Investigators

OBJECTIVES

We sought to determine the relative cost and effectiveness of two different reperfusion modalities in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI).

BACKGROUND

Recent studies have found superior clinical outcomes after reperfusion by primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) compared with thrombolytic therapy. The high up-front costs of cardiac catheterization may diminish the relative advantages of this invasive strategy.

METHODS

Detailed in-hospital charge data were available from all 358 patients with AMI randomized to tissue-type plasminogen activator (t-PA) or primary PTCA in the United States from the Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction trial. Resource consumption during late follow-up was estimated by assessment of major clinical events and functional status.

RESULTS

Compared with t-PA, primary PTCA resulted in reduced rates of in-hospital mortality (2.3% vs. 7.2%, p = 0.03), reinfarction (2.8% vs. 7.2%, p = 0.06), recurrent ischemia (11.3% vs. 28.7%, p < 0.0001) and stroke (0% vs. 3.9%, p = 0.02) and a shorter hospital stay (7.6 +/- 3.3 days vs. 8.4 +/- 4.7 days, p = 0.04). Despite the initial costs of cardiac catheterization in all patients with the invasive strategy, total mean (+/- SD) hospital charges were $3,436 lower per patient with PTCA than with t-PA ($23,468 +/- $13,410 vs. $26,904 +/- $18,246, p = 0.04), primarily due to the reduction in adverse in-hospital outcomes. However, professional fees were higher after primary PTCA ($4,185 +/- $3,183 vs. $3,322 +/- $2,728, p = 0.001), and thus total charges, although favoring PTCA, were not significantly different ($27,653 +/- $13,709 vs. $30,227 +/- 18,903, p = 0.21). At a mean follow-up time of 2.1 +/- 0.7 years, no major differences in postdischarge events or New York Heart Association functional class were present between PTCA- and t-PA-treated patients, suggesting similar late resource consumption. Including in-hospital events, 83% of PTCA-treated patients were alive and free of reinfarction at late follow-up, compared with 74% of t-PA-treated patients (p = 0.06).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with t-PA, reperfusion by primary PTCA improves clinical outcomes with similar or reduced costs. These findings have important clinical implications in an increasingly cost-conscious health care environment.