Changes in effective aortic valve area during ejection in adults with aortic stenosis

Usefulness of cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging for the evaluation of valve opening and closing kinetics in aortic stenosis

AIMS

The aims of this study were : (i) to determine the feasibility and reproducibility of the measurement of valve kinetic parameters by cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) and (ii) to examine the association between these parameters and markers of a poor prognosis in patients with aortic stenosis (AS).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Eight healthy control subjects and 71 patients with AS (0.60 cm(2) ≤ EOA ≤ 1.90 cm(2)) underwent transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and CMR. The valve opening slope (OS) and closing slope (CS) were calculated from instantaneous effective orifice area (EOA) curves obtained by CMR. Intra- and inter-observer variability were 4.8 ± 3.9 and 5.0 ± 4.1%, respectively, for OS, 3.8 ± 2.9 and 4.0 ± 3.1% for CS. OS was significantly related to the plasma level of NT-pro-brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) (r = -0.36, P = 0.002), whereas the EOA or gradient were not.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates the excellent feasibility and reproducibility of CMR for the measurement of valve kinetic parameters in patients with AS. Larger studies are needed to confirm the incremental prognostic value of these new CMR parameters of aortic valve kinetics in patients with severe AS.

Development of markers of valve stiffness for prediction of hemodynamic progression of aortic stenosis

Degenerative aortic valve stenosis is a progressive disease with an unpredictable rate of progression. Early changes in the degenerative process include thickening and stiffening of the leaflets, reflected in altered rates of opening and closing. Methods have been proposed to measure this in vivo and relate it to the rate of disease progression. In this in vitro study, we tested the hypothesis that changes in ambient hemodynamics that might contribute to the wear and tear process that mediates the degenerative process affect valve mechanics, and that this is reflected in the rates of valve opening and closing. Evidence supporting this hypothesis is presented and an alternative method to account for these effects is proposed.

Flow-Dependent Changes in Doppler-Derived Aortic Valve Effective Orifice Area Are Real and Not Due to Artifact

OBJECTIVES

We sought to determine whether the flow-dependent changes in Doppler-derived valve effective orifice area (EOA) are real or due to artifact.

BACKGROUND

It has frequently been reported that the EOA may vary with transvalvular flow in patients with aortic stenosis. However, the explanation of the flow dependence of EOA remains controversial and some studies have suggested that the EOA estimated by Doppler-echocardiography (EOA(Dop)) may underestimate the actual EOA at low flow rates.

METHODS

One bioprosthetic valve and three rigid orifices were tested in a mock flow circulation model over a wide range of flow rates. The EOA(Dop) was compared with reference values obtained using particle image velocimetry (EOA(PIV)).

RESULTS

There was excellent agreement between EOA(Dop) and EOA(PIV) (r2 = 0.94). For rigid orifices of 0.5 and 1.0 cm2, no significant change in the EOA was observed with increasing flow rate. However, substantial increases of both EOA(Dop) and EOA(PIV) were observed when stroke volume increased from 20 to 70 ml both in the 1.5 cm2 rigid orifice (+52% for EOA(Dop) and +54% for EOA(PIV)) and the bioprosthetic valve (+62% for EOA(Dop) and +63% for EOA(PIV)); such changes are explained either by the presence of unsteady effects at low flow rates and/or by an increase in valve leaflet opening.

CONCLUSIONS

The flow-dependent changes in EOA(Dop) are not artifacts but represent real changes in EOA attributable either to unsteady effects at low flow rates and/or to changes in valve leaflet opening. Such changes in EOA(Dop) can be relied on for clinical judgment making.

Estimation of aortic valve effective orifice area by Doppler echocardiography: effects of valve inflow shape and flow rate

BACKGROUND

The effective orifice area (EOA) is the standard parameter for the clinical assessment of aortic stenosis severity. It has been reported that EOA measured by Doppler echocardiography does not necessarily provide an accurate estimate of the cross-sectional area of the flow jet at the vena contracta, especially at low flow rates. The objective of this study was to test the validity of the Doppler-derived EOA.

METHODS

Triangular and circular orifice plates, funnels, and bioprosthetic valves were inserted into an in vitro aortic flow model and were studied under different physiologic flow rates corresponding to cardiac outputs varying from 1.5 to 7 L/min. For each experiment, the EOA was measured by Doppler and compared with the catheter-derived EOA and with the EOA derived from a theoretic formula. In bioprostheses, the geometric orifice area (GOA) was estimated from images acquired by high-speed video recording.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference between the EOA derived from the 3 methods with the rigid orifices (Doppler vs catheter: y = 0.97x +0.18 mm(2), r(2) = 0.98; Doppler vs theory: y = 1.00x -3.60 mm(2), r(2) = 0.99). Doppler EOA was not significantly influenced by the flow rate in rigid orifices. As predicted by theory, the average contraction coefficient (EOA/GOA) was around 0.6 in the orifice plates and around 1.0 in the funnels. In the bioprosthetic valves, both EOA and GOA increased with increasing flow rate whereas contraction coefficient was almost constant with an average value of 0.99. There was also a very good concordance between EOA and GOA (y = 0.94x +0.05 mm(2), r(2) = 0.88).

CONCLUSIONS

In rigid aortic stenosis, the Doppler EOA is much less flow dependent than generally assumed. Indeed, it depends mainly on the GOA and the inflow shape (flat vs funnel-shaped) of the stenosis. The flow dependence of Doppler EOA observed in clinical studies is likely a result of a variation of the valve GOA or of the valve inflow shape and not an inherent flow dependence of the EOA derived by the continuity equation.

Temporal variations in effective orifice area during ejection in patients with valvular aortic stenosis

Effective orifice area (EOA) is the standard index for assessing aortic stenosis (AS) severity. However, EOA varies during ejection and a single measurement at 1 ejection time point may not fully describe the hemodynamic severity of a stenotic aortic valve. We investigated whether the dynamic change in EOA during ejection differs between patients with severe AS (EOA </= 1.0 cm(2)) (n = 15) and age-/sex-matched control patients (n = 15), and whether the ejection pattern varies with AS severity (n = 45). In patients with severe AS, maximum left ventricular outflow tract velocity (V(LVOT)) and transvalvular velocity (V(AS)) occurred later in the ejection period (EP) when compared with control patients (V(LVOT) 47 +/- 8 vs 29 +/- 8%, P =.0001; V(AS) 36 +/- 7 vs 27 +/- 8%, P =.003). Maximum V(LVOT) occurred later than maximum V(AS) in patients with severe AS (47 +/- 8 vs 36 +/- 7%, P =.0005), but simultaneously in control patients (29 +/- 8 vs 27 +/- 8%, P = NS). Patients with severe AS had a slower EOA opening rate than control patients (4 +/- 1 vs 41 +/- 38 cm(2)/s, P =.002) and reached 80% and 100% of maximum EOA later in the EP (43 +/- 26 vs 15 +/- 6%, P =.001; 70 +/- 20 vs 48 +/- 30%, P =.03). EOA tended to increase between 10% and 90% of the EP in patients with severe AS, but had a plateau in control patients (slope 0.38 +/- 0.26 vs 0.02 +/- 0.25% change in EOA per 1% change of EP, P =.0006). In patients with severe AS, EOA was >/=80% of maximum EOA for a shorter duration during ejection compared with control patients (49 +/- 25 vs 64 +/- 14%, P =.05). EOA opening rate, time to maximum V(LVOT), time to maximum V(AS), and time to 80% of maximum EOA correlated with mean pressure gradient (r = -0.80, 0.63, 0.42, and 0.54, respectively, n = 45). Indices of ejection dynamics and valve kinetics differ in patients with AS and may provide further insight into the hemodynamic or physiologic severity of a stenotic aortic valve.

In vivo analysis of aortic valve dynamics by transesophageal 3-dimensional echocardiography with high temporal resolution

OBJECTIVES

Knowledge of aortic valve function has been obtained from experimental studies. The aim of the present study was to investigate characteristics of aortic valve motion in humans.

METHODS

Fifty-six patients were studied: 19 with normal valve and good systolic left ventricular function (Group NL), 12 with normal valve and reduced left ventricular function (Group CMP), and 25 with aortic stenosis and good left ventricular function (Group AS). The frame rate was doubled (50 Hz) compared with previous 3-dimensional systems. A mean of 38 +/- 9 images were acquired per cardiac cycle, with 14 +/- 4 images during the systole. The changes in shape and orifice area were analyzed over time.

RESULTS

With normal valves, valve movement proceeded in 3 phases: rapid opening, slow closing, rapid closing. Stenotic valves showed a slower opening and closing movement. The times to maximum opening in Groups NL, CMP, AS were 76 +/- 30, 88 +/- 18 (P =.06), and 130 +/- 29 (P <.01) ms, respectively. It was inversely correlated to the maximum orifice area (r = -0.59, P <.001). The opening velocities in Groups NL, CMP, AS were 42 +/- 23, 28 +/- 9 (P <.05), and 5 +/- 2 (P <.001) cm(2)/s, respectively. There was a close correlation between the opening velocity and the maximum orifice area (r = 0.87, P <.001). Slow valve closings occurred at a velocity of 8.0 +/- 5.2, 5.3 +/- 2.0 (P =.21), 2.8 +/- 1.1 (P <.01) cm(2)/s, respectively, and rapid closings in Groups NL and CMP at 50 +/- 23, 29 +/- 8 (P <.01) cm(2)/s. The results show good agreement with experimental data.

CONCLUSION

Rapid aortic valve movement can be recorded by 3-dimensional echocardiography and analyzed quantitatively. Time and velocity indices of valve dynamics are influenced by valvular and myocardial factors. A comparable in vivo analysis is not possible with any other imaging procedure.

Hemodynamic-induced changes in aortic valve area: implications for Doppler cardiac output determinations

Monitoring cardiac output (CO) by transesophageal echocardiography involves measurements of ascending aortic flow and an initial measurement of aortic valve area (AVA). Hemodynamic-induced changes in AVA are a potential source of error for this simplified method. Our goal was to quantify these changes in AVA and their effects on CO calculations. In 17 anesthetized patients, a dobutamine infusion was titrated to achieve a 50% increase in ascending aortic flow velocity (V(max)). Hemodynamic and echocardiographic variables, including V(max) and planimetry of AVA, were determined at baseline and at maximal dobutamine dose. Dobutamine produced a 3.0 +/- 1.4 L/min increase in CO, a 54.5% +/- 19.6% increase in V(max), and a 50.6% +/- 34.2% increase in systolic blood pressure. AVA increased by 4.3% +/- 2.6% during dobutamine infusion (P < 0.001). The simplified CO method, which does not account for increases in AVA, produced a 0.32 +/- 0.24 L/min underestimation of CO. This investigation demonstrates hemodynamic-induced changes in AVA. The use of a single AVA measurement for all subsequent CO calculations introduces a clinically acceptable degree of error, supporting a simplified CO protocol requiring less probe manipulation and reduced procedural time.

IMPLICATIONS

An intraoperative dobutamine infusion was used to increase aortic blood flow and demonstrate hemodynamic-induced changes in aortic valve area. These valve-area changes affect the accuracy of Doppler cardiac output determinations.

Rate of change in aortic valve area during a cardiac cycle can predict the rate of hemodynamic progression of aortic stenosis

BACKGROUND

The ability to predict the rate of hemodynamic progression in an individual patient with valvular aortic stenosis has been elusive. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate whether the rate of change in aortic valve area (AVA) measured during the ejection phase of a cardiac cycle predicts the rate of hemodynamic progression in patients with asymptomatic aortic stenosis.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In 84 adults with initially asymptomatic aortic stenosis and a baseline AVA of > or =0.9 cm(2), annual echocardiographic data were obtained prospectively (mean follow-up 2.8+/-1.3 years). With the initial echocardiogram, the ratio of AVA measured at mid-acceleration and mid-deceleration to the AVA at peak velocity was calculated. The primary outcome variable was the annual rate of change in AVA (rate of progression), with rate of progression classified as rapid (a reduction in AVA of > or =0.2 cm(2)/y) or slow (<0.2 cm(2)/y). Rapid progression was significantly associated with an AVA ratio of > or =1.25 (P=0.004, risk ratio 3.1, 95% CI 1.2 to 7.9). The sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value of AVA ratio of > or =1.25 for the prediction o rapid progression of valvar aortic stenosis was 64%, 72%, and 80% respectively. The decrease in ejection fraction measured from the initial to final echocardiogram was small but greater for patients with an AVA ratio of > or =1.25 (-4+/-7% versus +2+/-7%, P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

A flow-dependent change in AVA can be measured during a routine transthoracic echocardiographic study. The rate of change in AVA is an additional measure of disease severity and may be used to predict an individual's risk for subsequent rapid disease progression.

Flow dynamics of stenotic aortic valves assessed by signal processing of Doppler spectrograms

Clinical assessment of aortic stenosis (AS) is sometimes challenging, because all hemodynamic indexes of severity are modified by flow rate. However, the mechanisms underlying flow dependence remain controversial. Analysis of instantaneous flow dynamics has provided crucial information in a number of cardiovascular disorders and may add new insight into this phenomenon. This study was designed to analyze in vivo the effects of flow interventions on instantaneous valvular dynamics of stenotic valves. For this purpose, a custom algorithm for signal processing of Doppler spectrograms was developed and validated against a control population. Digital Doppler recordings at the aortic valve and left ventricular outflow tract were obtained in 15 patients with AS, at baseline and during low-dose dobutamine infusion; 10 normal subjects were studied as controls. Spectrograms were processed by signal averaging, time alignment, modal-velocity enhancement, envelope tracing, and numerical interpolation. Instantaneous relative aortic valve area (rAVA) was obtained by the continuity equation and plotted against normalized ejection time. Curves were classified as either type A (rapid, early-systolic opening) or type B (slow, end-systolic opening). Curves from controls closely matched prior knowledge of normal valve dynamics, but curves from patients were clearly different: all controls except 2 (80%) had type A, whereas all patients except 3 (80%) had a type B pattern (p = 0.03). Dobutamine infusion in patients increased and slightly anticipated peak rAVA by accelerating valve opening. Despite similar values of area and pressure difference, type B dynamics were associated with lower blood pressure (p = 0.01) and worse long-term outcome (>3 years) than type A flow dynamics (p = 0.02). Signal processing of Doppler spectrograms allows a comprehensive assessment of aortic flow dynamics. Differences in timing of valve aperture and in maximal leaflet excursion account for flow-mediated changes in valve area, suggesting complementary effects of inertia and elasticity on the kinetics of stenotic aortic valves. Flow-dynamic analysis provides novel clinical information regarding physiology of AS unavailable to conventional indexes.

Stress Echocardiography in Aortic Stenosis: Insights into Valve Mechanics and Hemodynamics

Stress interventions have been classically combined with cardiac catheterization recordings to understand the hemodynamic principles of valvular stenosis. Indices of aortic stenosis such as pressure gradient and valve area were based on simple hydraulic principles and have proved to be clinically useful for patient management during a number of decades. With the advent of Doppler echocardiography, these hemodynamic indices can be readily obtained noninvasively. Abundant evidence obtained using exercise and pharmacological stress echocardiography has demonstrated that the assumptions of classic hemodynamic models of aortic stenosis were wrong. Consequently, it is recognized that conventional indices may be misleading indicators of aortic stenosis significance in particular clinical situations. To improve diagnostic accuracy, several alternative hemodynamic models have been developed in the past few years, including valve resistance and left ventricular stroke work loss, among others. Nevertheless, these more-accurate indices should be obtainable noninvasively and need to demonstrate greater diagnostic and prognostic power than conventional indices; preliminary data suggest such superiority. Stress echocardiography is well established as the tool of choice for testing hypothesis and physical models of cardiac valve function. Although the final role of alternative indices is not yet well established, the new insights into valvular hemodynamics provided by this technique may change the clinical assessment of aortic stenosis.

Aortic stenosis. Clinical evaluation and optimal timing of surgery

Aortic valve disease is common in the elderly with recent data suggesting that aortic sclerosis and stenosis are the end-stage of an active disease process. Aortic atenosis may be diagnosed at symptom onset (angina, heart failure or syncope) but often the diagnosis is suspected in an asymptomatic patient with a systolic murmur. The diagnosis can be confirmed and disease severity evaluated reliably using Doppler echocardiography. Symptomatic severe aortic stenosis is treated with valve replacement, even in the elderly, due to the extremely poor prognosis without relief of outflow obstruction. Management is controversial when there is coexisting moderate aortic stenosis and left ventricular systolic dysfunction.

The natural history and rate of progression of aortic stenosis

One of the challenges in clinical cardiology is to determine the optimal time of valve replacement surgery in patients with aortic stenosis. To meet this challenge, one requires an accurate knowledge of the natural history and rate of progression of the disease. This review will summarize the natural history of aortic stenosis in terms of symptoms, mortality, and stenosis progression.

Echocardiographic quantitation of mitral regurgitation: a new Doppler technique

Our objective is to develop a new transthoracic Doppler echocardiographic technique to determine mitral regurgitant fraction. The standard color Doppler method for assessment of mitral regurgitation is semiquantitative and dependent on instrument gain. By using the mitral and aortic valve continuous wave Doppler velocities, one can determine regurgitant fraction. This technique takes into account the flow dependence of the mitral valve area. Two constants, A and B, which represent the flow dependence of the mitral valve area and the ratio of the mitral valve area to aortic valve area at zero flow, respectively, were determined by regression in 36 patients without valvular disease (r = .89). Thirty patients with isolated mitral regurgitation were then studied. The mitral regurgitant fraction was calculated from the following: Regurgitant fraction = 1 - TVIav/Bf[Vmv/(1 - AVmv)]dt, where TVIav is the time velocity integral across the aortic valve, Vmv is the continuous wave velocity across the mitral valve, and A and B are constants. The regurgitant fraction was then compared with color Doppler assessment of mitral regurgitation assessed by independent observers. In patients with mitral regurgitation, there was a strong correlation between standard visual assessment and our new Doppler method (Kendall's tau b rank correlation = 0.65; p < .001). The new Doppler method was able to correctly categorize 90% of patients with mild mitral regurgitation and 88% of patients with severe mitral regurgitation; however, there was poorer agreement with the color Doppler assessment of moderate mitral regurgitation. Mitral regurgitant fraction can be calculated with our new Doppler method. This method is quantitative, objective, nongain dependent, and separates mild from severe mitral regurgitation well.

Planimetry of aortic valve area using multiplane transoesophageal echocardiography is not a reliable method for assessing severity of aortic stenosis

OBJECTIVE

To assess the reliability of aortic valve area planimetry by multiplane transoesophageal echocardiography (TOE) in aortic stenosis.

DESIGN

Study of the diagnostic value of aortic valve area planimetry using multiplane TOE, compared with catheterisation and the continuity equation, both being considered as criterion standards.

SETTING

University hospital.

PATIENTS

49 consecutive patients (29 male, 20 female, aged 44 to 82 years, average 66.6 (SD 8.5)), referred for haemodynamic evaluation of an aortic stenosis, were enrolled in a prospective study. From this sample, 37 patients were eligible for the final analysis.

METHODS

Transthoracic and multiplane transoesophageal echocardiograms were performed within 24 hours before catheterisation. At transthoracic echo, aortic valve area was calculated by the continuity equation. At TOE, the image of the aortic valve opening was obtained with a 30-65 degrees rotation of the transducer. Numerical dynamic images were stored on optical discs for off-line analysis and were reviewed by two blinded observers. Catheterisation was performed in all cases and aortic valve area was calculated by the Gorlin formula.

RESULTS

Feasibility of the method was 92% (48/52). The agreement between aortic valve area measured at TOE (mean 0.88 (SD 0.35) cm2) and at catheterisation (0.79 (0.24) cm2) was very poor. The same discrepancies were found between TOE and the continuity equation (0.72 (0.26) cm2). TOE planimetry overestimated aortic valve area determined by the two other methods. Predictive positive and negative values of planimetry to detect aortic valve area < 0.75 cm2 were 62% (10/16) and 43% (9/21) respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Planimetry of aortic valve area by TOE is difficult and less accurate than the continuity equation for assessing the severity of aortic stenosis.