Detection of coronary vasospasm by posthyperventilation technetium-99m sestamibi single-photon emission computed tomography imaging in patients with coronary artery disease

Clinical usefulness of myocardial scintigraphy in patients with vasospastic angina

BACKGROUND

Myocardial scintigraphy is defined as class IIb in the Japanese Circulation Society guideline for diagnosis of vasospastic angina (VSA). However, Caucasian guidelines had no classification of cardiac scintigraphy for diagnosis of VSA.

OBJECTIVES

To clarify the clinical usefulness of myocardial scintigraphy, we analyzed the sensitivity and specificity of each cardiac scintigraphy.

METHODS

We extracted the 136 papers of myocardial scintigraphy from the PubMed database from 1980 to 2018 in patients with VSA. Finally we analyzed the 88 papers including 33 papers of^201-thallium (Tl), 10 papers of ¹²³I beta-methyl 15-para-iodophenyl 3(R, S)-methylpentadecanoic acid (BMIPP), 9 papers of ¹²³I-metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG), 4 papers of ^99mTc-sestamibi (MIBI: methoxy-isobutyl-isonitrile), and 2 papers of tetrofosmin to investigate the sensitivity and specificity of each tracer.

RESULTS

Tl, BMIPP, or MIBG cardiac scintigraphy were useful to diagnose patients with VSA, because sensitivity was 57-73%. Specificity was 55-83%. Sensitivity of left circumflex artery was significantly lower than other vessels. BMIPP imaging may be helpful for clinical course of VSA. However, myocardial scintigraphic abnormal findings may not always show the ischemic memory due to coronary artery spasm.

CONCLUSIONS

Recent cardiologists do not perform hyperventilation tests or MIBG scintigraphy for diagnosis of coronary spasm. After understanding the flow of the times, cardiologists should use Tl or BMIPP myocardial scintigraphy for VSA as one of supplementary tools in the real world.

Disruption of coronary vasomotor function: the coronary spasm syndrome

Abnormal coronary vasoconstriction, or coronary spasm, can be the result of several factors, including local and neuroendocrine aberrations. It can manifest clinically as a coronary syndrome and plays an important role in the genesis of myocardial ischemia. Over the past half century, coronary angiography allowed the in vivo demonstration of spasm in patients who fit the initial clinical description of the condition as reported by Prinzmetal et al. Several clinical, basic, and more recently, genetic studies have provided insight into the pathogenesis, manifestations, and therapy of this condition. It is not uncommonly encountered in patients with coronary syndromes and absence of clearly pathologic lesions on angiography. Provocation tests utilizing pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic stimuli combined with imaging (echocardiography or coronary angiography) can help make the correct diagnosis. The use of calcium channel blockers and long-acting nitrates is currently considered standard of care and the overall prognosis appears to be good. The recent discovery of genetic abnormalities predisposing to abnormal spasm of the coronaries has stimulated interest in the development of targeted therapies for the management of this condition.

Coronary spasm reflects inputs from adjacent esophageal system

Mechanisms underlying coronary spasm are still poorly understood. The aim of the study was to assess the hypothesis that fluctuations in the development of coronary spasm might reflect inputs from the adjacent esophageal system. We enrolled patients admitted to the coronary care unit for episodes of nocturnal angina. Seven patients with variant angina and five with coronary artery disease (CAD) had concurrent ECG and esophageal manometric monitoring. ECG monitoring documented 28 episodes of ST elevation in variant angina patients and 16 episodes of ST depression in CAD patients. Manometric analysis showed that esophageal spasms resulted remarkably more frequently in variant angina patients (143 total spasms; individual range 9–31) than in CAD patients (20 total spasms; individual range 0–9; P < 0.01). Time series analysis was used to assess fluctuations in the occurrence of abnormal esophageal waves and its relationship with spontaneous episodes of ST shift. Episodes of esophageal spasm in CAD were sporadic (<1 in 30 min) and not related to ECG-recorded ischemia. In the variant angina group, esophageal spasms were time related to ischemia (>1 into 5 min before ECG-recorded ischemia) ( P < 0.05). A bidirectional analysis of causal effects showed that the influence processes between esophageal and coronary spasms were mutual and reciprocal (transfer function model, P < 0.05) in variant angina. We concluded that in variant angina patients, episodes of esophageal spasms and myocardial ischemia influenced each other. Mechanisms that cause esophageal spasm can feed back to produce coronary spasm. Coronary spasm may feed forward to produce additional episodes of esophageal spasm.