Comparison of exercise electron beam computed tomography and sestamibi in the evaluation of coronary artery disease

Cardiac CT in emergency department patients with acute chest pain

Current strategies for the triage of patients who have chest pain but normal initial cardiac enzyme levels and nondiagnostic electrocardiograms do not permit efficient risk stratification. The potentially fatal consequences and high malpractice costs of missed acute coronary syndromes lead every year to the unnecessary hospital admission of about 2.8 million patients who present with acute chest pain in emergency departments in the United States. Most of these patients are at very low risk for an acute coronary syndrome. However, the standard clinical work-up does not provide information about the presence and extent of coronary artery disease. In most patients (80%-94%) with an acute coronary syndrome, a significant coronary artery stenosis can be detected with selective coronary angiography. High levels of diagnostic accuracy also have been established for the detection of significant coronary artery stenosis with the use of 16- and 64-section multidetector computed tomography (CT) in patients with stable angina. Preliminary data indicate that multidetector CT also can help quantify and characterize coronary atherosclerotic plaque and that the CT findings are in good agreement with those at intravascular ultrasonography. Although multidetector CT provides accurate information about the presence of coronary artery disease, large blinded observational studies are warranted to identify CT characteristics with high accuracy for diagnosis of acute coronary syndromes. Such information would enable the conduct of randomized controlled trials to determine whether the detection of coronary stenosis and plaque with multidetector CT improves triage and reduces the costs or increases the cost-effectiveness of management of acute chest pain.

Use of a new myocardial centroid for measurement of regional myocardial dysfunction by electron beam computed tomography: comparison with technetium-99m sestamibi infarct size quantification

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

The study compared the performance of conventional endocardial and epicardial centroid algorithms with the new "myocardial" centroid algorithm in patients with anterior myocardial infarction. "Floating" endocardial or epicardial centroid algorithms, commonly used in tomographic imaging methods to assess regional motion, may misrepresent left ventricular regional myocardial function in the presence of markedly asymmetric left ventricular contraction.

METHODS

A new centroid algorithm based on regional myocardial mass distribution was tested in 29 patients with a first anterior myocardial infarction and was compared with conventional centroid algorithms. Direct comparisons in 60 equal sectors at one midventricular level per patient were performed between electron beam computed tomography and technetium-99m sestamibi single-photon emission computed tomography. The thresholds of regional myocardial function used to define infarction were varied for regional ejection fraction from 20% to 40% and for regional wall thickening from 0 to 4 mm. Regression and Bland-Altman analysis were used to compare infarct size by regional myocardial function with infarct size by sestamibi single-photon emission computed tomography.

RESULTS

The new myocardial centroid showed the least shift toward infarcted myocardium from diastole to systole and had the highest amplitudes of the measurement curves for regional ejection fraction and regional wall thickening. The optimal regional myocardial function thresholds for each centroid algorithm for regional ejection fraction were endocardial, 30% (R = 0.62; mean difference to sestamibi, -0.5% +/- 22.1% tomographic infarct size points); epicardial, 30% (R = 0.79; mean difference, 2.2% +/- 13.1% tomographic infarct size points); and new myocardial, 25% (R = 0.88; mean difference, -0.6% +/- 9.5% tomographic infarct size points). The optimal thresholds for regional wall thickening were endocardial, 1 mm (R = 0.70; mean difference, -2.2% +/- 14.3% tomographic infarct size points); epicardial, 1 mm (R = 0.78; mean difference, -4.6% +/- 12.7% tomographic infarct size points); and new myocardial, 2 mm (R = 0.71; mean difference, 2.1% +/- 14.1% tomographic infarct size points). The best agreement (R = 0.88) between electron beam computed tomography infarct size and sestamibi single-photon emission computed tomography infarct size was achieved with regional ejection fraction and the new myocardial centroid algorithm.

CONCLUSIONS

In asymmetrically contracting left ventricles, the new myocardial centroid algorithm is superior to conventional methods for tomographic analysis of regional myocardial function.

Accurate measures of left ventricular ejection fraction using electron beam tomography: a comparison with radionuclide angiography, and cine angiography

BACKGROUND

Quantitative determination of ejection fraction is predicated on precise measurement of end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes of the left ventricle. Contrast enhanced electron beam tomography (EBT), with excellent temporal and spatial resolution, has the potential for highly accurate measures of ejection fraction.

METHODS

EBT protocol used a short axis scan of the left ventricle (8-12 levels, apex to base) during infusion of iodinated contrast. To assess the accuracy of the measured left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), we compared EBT with first-pass radionuclide angiography (RNA) and cine angiography (CINE).

RESULTS

A total of 41 patients (26 men and 15 women) underwent all three tests within 1 week. Resting ejection fraction using each modality was assessed in a linear regression model to assess inter-test correlation with the other two modalities. Correlation between CINE and EBT was high (r = 0.90, intercept 4.67, p < 0.001). Similarly, correlation of CINE and RNA (r = 0.87, intercept -5.48, p < 0.001) and between EBT and RNA (r = 0.87, intercept -4.6, p < 0.001) were high. In a subset of those patients with LVEF < or = 40%, correlation was consistently high between EBT and CINE. However, correlations were poor for the comparisons between RNA and CINE (r = 0.40), and between the RNA and EBT (r = 0.47). The mean differences of measured ejection fractions between each of the imaging modality were small. However, there was only modest agreement between each of the comparisons as measured using 95% confidence interval (CI) on Bland-Altman plots.

CONCLUSION

These data indicate that the LVEF results are comparable among EBT, RNA, and CINE and can be used interchangeably to assess ventricular function for LVEF > 40%. For LVEF < or = 40%, we demonstrated some disparate results between cine angiography and RNA and between EBT and RNA, indicating that CINE or EBT may provide more accurate assessment.

Effect of exercise on left and right ventricular ejection fraction and wall motion

OBJECTIVE

We evaluated the diagnostic value of response of left and right ventricular ejection fraction and wall motion to exercise using electron beam computed tomography.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We attempted to determine the value of exercise electron beam computed tomography for detecting coronary artery disease, including evaluation of the right ventricular ejection fraction and wall motion abnormalities. A study of 35 patients undergoing electron beam tomography exercise cine studies and coronary artery angiography for the evaluation of chest pain was performed. Of the 18 patients with significant coronary disease (> or = 50% luminal diameter stenosis in at least one coronary artery), 17 (94%) had failure to increase global left ventricular ejection fraction with exercise. Fourteen of 18 (78%) developed a wall motion abnormality during peak exercise, and eight (44%) developed a regional right ventricular wall motion abnormality during peak exercise. Of the 17 patients without obstructive disease, 14 (82%) had a increase in ejection fraction > or = 5% and none had an abnormal response in left ventricular wall motion during peak exercise (specificity = 100%). The change in right ventricular ejection fraction with exercise was not a significant predictor of obstructive coronary disease in this study (P=NS). Using different criteria during stress to predict coronary disease, the accuracy was 89% (31/35) using an increase of <5% in ejection fraction, 89% (31/35) using the development of a new or worsened wall motion abnormality, and 91% (32/35) using both left ventricular criteria.

CONCLUSION

Our study suggests that exercise electron beam computed tomography appears to be a useful tool for the detection of coronary disease. A increase of <5% in ejection fraction and abnormal left ventricular response to exercise were important predictors, while the exercise induced changes of right ventricular ejection fraction was not a significant predictor of obstructive disease. Both left and right ventricular wall motion abnormalities are useful and important parameters in identifying patients with obstructive disease from those with normal coronary arteries.

Technetium Tc 99m sestamibi myocardial perfusion imaging: current role for evaluation of prognosis

Like 201Tl imaging, technetium Tc 99m sestamibi (MIBI) myocardial imaging can be used with exercise and pharmacologic testing to assess the presence of coronary artery disease. An increasing body of literature indicates that MIBI can also be used to assess risk of future cardiac events such as myocardial infarction or death. This article summarizes the current status of MIBI imaging for evaluating prognosis in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease.