Drug therapy for prevention of atrial fibrillation

Pharmacotherapy of Atrial Fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation is the most common sustained arrhythmia of clinical significance. Its prevalence rises with age. It is a significant cause of thromboembolic phenomena. We describe briefly the etiology and classification of atrial fibrillation, the risk factors for thromboembolism and stroke associated with it, the indications for hospitalization, and the therapeutic goal. We discuss in depth the management strategies for such patients and compare the impact of rate versus rhythm control in reducing morbidity and mortality attributed to arrhythmia, in light of past and present trials. A brief overview of the drugs used in the management of atrial fibrillation, their pharmacology and dosage, their effects and use in rhythm versus rate control with important side effects are also included. Finally, the prevention and treatment of thromboembolism in patients with atrial fibrillation, an important aspect of therapy, is revisited in light of recent advances.

Vagal paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: prevalence and ablation outcome in patients without structural heart disease

INTRODUCTION

The prevalence of vagal and adrenergic atrial fibrillation (AF) and the success rate of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) are not well defined. We investigated the prevalence of vagal and adrenergic AF and the ablation success rate of antral pulmonary vein isolation (APVI) in patients with these triggers compared with patients with random AF.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Two hundred and nine consecutive patients underwent APVI due to symptomatic drug refractory paroxysmal AF. Patients were diagnosed as vagal or adrenergic AF if >90% of AF episodes were related to vagal or adrenergic triggers; otherwise, a diagnosis of random AF was made. Clinical, electrocardiogram (ECG), and Holter follow-up was every 3 months in the first year and every 6 months afterward and for symptoms. Of 209 patients, 57 (27%) had vagal AF, 14 (7%) adrenergic AF, and 138 (66%) random AF. Vagal triggers were sleep (96.4%), postprandial (96.4%), late post-exercise (51%), cold stimulus (20%), coughing (7%), and swallowing (2%). At APVI, 94.3% of patients had isolation of all veins. Twenty-five (12%) patients had a second APVI. At a follow-up of 21 +/- 15 months, the percentage of patients free of AF was 75% in the vagal group, 86% in the adrenergic group, and 82% for random AF (P = 0.51).

CONCLUSION

In patients with PAF and no structural heart disease referred for APVI, vagal AF is present in approximately one quarter. APVI is equally effective in patients with vagal AF as in adrenergic and random AF.

Interrelationships Between the Autonomic Nervous System and Atrial Fibrillation

Mechanisms responsible for atrial fibrillation are not completely understood but the autonomic nervous system is a potentially potent modulator of the initiation, maintenance, termination and ventricular rate determination of atrial fibrillation. Complex interactions exist between the parasympathetic and sympathetic nervous systems on the central, ganglionic, peripheral, tissue, cellular and subcellular levels that could be responsible for alterations in conduction and refractoriness properties of the heart as well as the presence and type of triggered activity, all of which could contribute to atrial fibrillation. These dynamic inter-relationships may also be altered dependent upon other neurohumoral modulators and cardiac mechanical effects from ventricular dysfunction and congestive heart failure. The clinical implications regarding the effects of the autonomic nervous system in atrial fibrillation are widespread. The effects of modulating ganglionic input into the atria may alter the presence or absence of atrial fibrillation as has been highlighted from ablation investigations. This article reviews what is known regarding the inter-relationships between the autonomic nervous system and atrial fibrillation and provides state of the art information at all levels of autonomic interactions.

Propafenone hepatotoxicity: report of two new cases

Two patients developed acute cholestatic hepatitis during treatment with propafenone. Viral infections, alcohol abuse, hepatotoxicity by other drugs, and biliary obstruction were excluded as causes. In one patient, liver biopsy showed changes consistent with a drug-associated injury. Another patient had autoimmune antibodies (ANA) in the serum. Following propafenone withdrawal, the clinical and biochemical profiles of both patients improved. Hepatic toxicity from the antiarrhythmic drug propafenone is highly uncommon. Moreover, the drug produces hepatocellular injury by an unknown mechanism. Most of the seven cases reported here had acute cholestatic hepatitis after a latency period of two to four weeks.

From cell to cageside: autonomic influences on cardiac rhythms in the dog

The autonomic nervous system is pivotal in the characteristics of normal and abnormal cardiac rhythms. Some of the unique features (pronounced sinus arrhythmia and wandering pacemaker) of the canine electrocardiogram can be explained by the influence of parasympathetic tone. Perturbations that enhance the sympathetic nervous system can also potentiate arrhythmias, or counteract antiarrhythmic action. Moreover, disorders of the innervation to the heart may actually cause some life-threatening arrhythmias. This article reviews the interactions of the autonomic nervous system and cardiac rhythms as they pertain to the normal dog, as well as to specific arrhythmias in the boxer and German shepherd dog. Emphasis is placed on relating information from electrophysiological investigations to the clinical arena, thus demonstrating the value of linking the basic and clinical sciences as one medicine: knowledge from cell to cageside.

Atrial fibrillation: a review of mechanism, etiology, and therapy

The prevalence of elderly individuals in the populations of developed countries is increasing rapidly, and atrial fibrillation (AF) is quite common in these elderly patients: currently, 11% of the U.S. population is between the ages of 65 and 85 years; 70% of people with AF are between the ages of 65 and 85 years. AF causes symptoms secondary to hemodynamic derangements that are the result of increased ventricular response and loss of atrial booster function. AF can lead to reversible impairment of left ventricular function, cardiac chamber dilatation, clinical heart failure, and thromboembolic events. AF requires treatment in order to prevent these potential complications. Type Ia, Ic, and III antiarrhythmics are capable of converting AF to normal sinus rhythm (NSR). Amiodarone has the greatest efficacy and safety for converting AF and maintaining NSR while digoxin and verapamil are ineffective in restoring NSR. Quinidine, flecainide, disopyramide, and sotalol have also been shown to maintain NSR after conversion of AF. Proarrhythmia is a definite concern with the latter four agents. Alternative therapy for AF includes anticoagulation with warfarin or aspirin for the prevention of thromboembolic events, and a variety of agents to control the ventricular response. All medications used to treat AF carry significant risks in the elderly, whether from proarrhythmia, overdosing because of compliance errors, or hemorrhage secondary to anticoagulation. Treatment of AF must be based on a careful risk-benefit evaluation. The physician must know the capability of the particular patient as well as drug mechanisms and effects in the elderly. The decision to convert patients from AF to NSR or to leave the patient in AF and control the ventricular response represents a complex intellectual challenge. Factors favoring one or the other of these two clinical strategies are discussed. Multicenter clinical trials, for example, the Atrial Fibrillation Follow-up Investigation Rhythm Management (AFFIRM) trial, are currently underway to assess various clinical strategies for maintenance of NSR following conversion from AF. Amiodarone is one of the drugs under investigation.