Usefulness of intravenous metoprolol to prevent syncope induced by head-up tilt

Pharmacologic prevention of recurrent vasovagal syncope: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Vasovagal syncope (VVS) is a transient loss of consciousness that currently imposes a high burden on health care systems with limited evidence of the comparative efficacy of available pharmacologic interventions. This study aims to compare all pharmacologic therapies suggested in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) through systematic review and network meta-analysis. A systematic search in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library was conducted to identify RCTs evaluating pharmacologic therapies for patients with VVS. The primary outcome was spontaneous VVS recurrence. The secondary outcome was a positive head-up tilt test (HUTT) after receiving intervention, regarded as a lower level of evidence. Pooled risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated using random-effect network meta-analysis. Pairwise meta-analysis for comparison with placebo was also performed when applicable. The surface under the cumulative ranking curve analysis was conducted to rank the treatments for each outcome. Twenty-eight studies with 1744 patients allocated to different medications or placebo were included. Network meta-analysis of the reduction in the primary outcome showed efficacy for midodrine (RR 0.55; 95% CI 0.35-0.85) and fluoxetine (especially in patients with concomitant anxiety) (RR 0.36; 95% CI 0.16-0.84). In addition, midodrine and atomoxetine were superior to other treatment options, considering positive HUTT (RR 0.37; 95% CI 0.23-0.59; and RR 0.49; 95% CI 0.28-0.86, respectively). Overall, midodrine was the only agent shown to reduce spontaneous syncopal events. Fluoxetine also seems to be beneficial but should be studied further in RCTs. Our network meta-analysis did not find evidence of the efficacy of any other medication.

Are treatments for vasovagal syncope effective? A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Therapies used to treat vaso-vagal syncope (VVS) recurrence have not been proven effective in single studies.

METHODS

Comprehensive search of PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Central databases of published trials was done. Randomized or non-randomized studies, comparing the intervention of interest to control group(s), with the endpoint of spontaneous recurrence or syncope on head-up tilt test, were included. Data were extracted on an intention-to-treat basis. Study heterogeneity was analyzed by Cochran's Q statistics. A random-effect analysis was used.

RESULTS

α-adrenergic agonists were found effective (n=400, OR 0.19, CI 0.06-0.62, p<0.05) in preventing VVS recurrence. β-blockers were not found to be effective when only randomized studies comparing β-blockers to non-pharmacologic agents were assessed (9 studies, n=583, OR 0.48, CI 0.22-1.04, p=0.06). Tilt-training had no effect when only randomized studies were considered (4 studies, n=298, OR 0.47, CI 0.21-1.05, p=0.07). Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors were found effective (n=131, OR 0.28, CI 0.10-0.74, p<0.05), though the analysis contained only 2 studies. Pacemakers were found effective in preventing syncope recurrence when all studies were analyzed (n=463, OR 0.13, CI 0.05-0.36, p<0.05). However, studies comparing active pacemaker to sensing mode only did not show benefit (3 studies, n=162, OR 0.45, CI 0.09-2.14, p=0.32).

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis highlights the totality of evidence for commonly used medications used to treat VVS, and the requirement for larger, double-blind, placebo controlled trials with longer follow-up.

Drugs and pacemakers for vasovagal, carotid sinus and situational syncope

BACKGROUND

Neurally mediated reflex syncope is the most common cause of transient loss of consciousness. In patients not responding to non-pharmacological treatment, pharmacological or pacemaker treatment might be considered.

OBJECTIVES

To examine the effects of pharmacological therapy and pacemaker implantation in patients with vasovagal syncope, carotid sinus syncope and situational syncope.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) on The Cochrane Library (Issue 1, 2008), PubMed (1950 until February 2008), EMBASE on OVID (1980 until February 2008) and CINAHL on EBSCOhost (1937 until February 2008). No language restrictions were applied.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included parallel randomized controlled trials and randomized cross-over trials of pharmacological treatment (beta-blockers, fludrocortisone, alpha-adrenergic agonists, selective serotonine reuptake inhibitors, ACE inhibitors, disopyramide, anticholinergic agents or salt tablets) or dual chamber pacemaker treatment. Studies were included if pharmacological or pacemaker treatment was compared with any form of standardised control treatment (standard treatment), placebo treatment, or (other) pharmacological or pacemaker treatment. We did not include non-randomized studies.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers independently assessed the risk of bias. Using a standardised data extraction form, they extracted characteristics and results of the various studies. In a consensus meeting they discussed any disagreements that had occurred during data extraction. If no agreement could be reached, a third reviewer was asked to make a decision. Summary estimates with 95% confidence intervals of treatment effect were calculated using relative risks, rate ratios or weighted means differences depending on the type of outcome reported.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 46 randomized studies, 40 on vasovagal syncope and six on carotid sinus syncope. No studies on situational syncope matched the criteria for inclusion in our review. Studies in general were small with a median sample size of 42. A wide range of control treatments were used with 22 studies using a placebo arm. Blinding of patients and treating physicians was applied in eight studies. Results varied considerably between studies and between types of outcomes.For vasovagal syncope, the occurrence of syncope upon provocational head-up tilt testing was lower upon treatment with beta-blockers, ACE-inhibitors and anticholinergic agents compared to standard treatment. For carotid sinus syncope, the occurrence of syncope upon carotid sinus massage was lower on midodrine treatment compared to placebo treatment in one study.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is insufficient evidence to support the use of any of the pharmacological or pacemaker treatments for vasovagal syncope and carotid sinus syncope. Larger studies using patient relevant outcomes are needed.

Prognostic value of head-up tilt test with intravenous beta-blocker administration in assessing the efficacy of therapy in patients with vasovagal syncope

BACKGROUND

Although beta-blockers are frequently used in order to prevent the recurrence of vasovagal syncope, the efficacy of this treatment is difficult to determine.

OBJECTIVES

To determine if the result of a tilt test with an intravenously administered beta-blocker can predict the long-term efficacy of beta-blockade.

METHODS

The study group consisted of 62 patients (29 females, mean age 32.8 +/- 12.3 years and 33 males, mean age 35.9 +/- 18.2 years) with at least two syncopal episodes during 6 months preceding the positive tilt test. After the baseline tilt test, propranolol (0.1 mg/kg BW) was administered intravenously and the tilt test was repeated. Beta-blockade was considered effective if the subsequent tilt test proved negative (complete efficacy) or if the time until the occurrence of syncope at the subsequent tilt test was longer compared to the baseline test (partial efficacy). All the patients were put on continuous propranolol treatment and were followed up for a period of 1 year or until the time when syncope recurred.

RESULTS

Intravenously administered propranolol prevented (n = 33) or delayed (n = 18) the occurrence of syncope at the tilt test in 51 patients (82%), while it was found ineffective in the remaining 11 patients (18%). During the 8.6 +/- 6.7 months (range 1-14) of the follow-up period, the syncope recurred in 20 patients (32%), with 13 patients (25%) in the group where intravenously administered propranolol proved effective versus 7 patients (64%) for whom intravenously administered propranolol did not prevent syncope during the tilt test (P < 0.015). The survival analysis with respect to the recurrence of syncope revealed a significant correlation between the results of the tilt test with intravenously administered propranolol and the efficacy of the long-term beta-blocker therapy (P < 0.003). There were no significant differences with respect to the predictive value of the tilt test with propranolol between the patients showing complete and partial propranolol efficacy (ns), while significant differences were observed between these two groups on one hand and the patients in whom intravenously administered propranolol was found ineffective on the other (P < 0.04 and P < 0.002, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Intravenous propranolol prevents tilt-induced syncope in a significant percentage of patients. The results of the tilt tests combined with the administration of propranolol predict the efficacy of a continuous propranolol treatment. Both complete and partial propranolol efficacy at tilt test can successfully identify those patients who will benefit from continuous beta blockade.

A review of pathophysiology and therapy of patients with vasovagal syncope

Vasovagal syncope is a common disorder that can compromise quality of life and lead to significant morbidity. It is characterized by an initial exaggerated sympathetic output followed by parasympathetic activation and sympathetic withdrawal, as shown by diagnostic head-up tilt (HUT) table testing. Numerous drugs have been evaluated for treating this disorder. beta-Blockers are well studied and commonly administered but are specifically more efficacious in patients with isoproterenol HUT than in those with regular HUT. The role of the serotonergic system has captured new interest. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors show promising results in preventing vasovagal syncope in treatment-refractory patients. Also, new investigations suggest that serotonin receptor antagonism may be beneficial. Despite these findings, definitive treatment does not exist.