Results of stenting of unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis in patients at high surgical risk

Isolated and Significant Left Main Coronary Artery Disease: Demographics, Hemodynamics and Angiographic Features

Left main coronary artery disease carries a poor prognosis. The etiology of isolated and significant left main coronary artery (ILMCA) disease is not well understood. Studies so far were limited by small numbers. The authors identified 46 patients with ILMCA disease from their database over 10 years (group I) and compared them with 83 consecutive patients undergoing catheterization (group II). They also compared patients with ostial vs distal ILMCA disease. Group I represented 0.1% of catheterization patients. The demographic profile and atherosclerotic risk factor profile of the 2 groups as well as ostial and distal ILMCA disease were compared. This is the largest study of ILMCA disease. Risk factors for atherosclerosis were commonly seen. Nonatherosclerotic causes of ILMCA disease were not seen. This study suggests coronary atherosclerosis as the predominant cause of ILMCA disease. ILMCA disease is more common in women. Diabetes is more commonly associated with distal ILMCA lesion. There is a trend suggesting that ostial ILMCA lesion is more common in smokers and women.

A "no-option" left main PCI registry: outcomes and predictors of in hospital mortality-utility of the logistic EuroSCORE

BACKGROUND

Although high-risk left main PCI populations have been previously described, there is little data describing outcomes and the role of the logistic EuroSCORE in surgical turndown cohorts or patients in extremis due to acute infarction or cardiogenic shock from left main ischemia.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with unprotected LM PCI who were surgical turndowns or in extremis were included in this retrospective cohort from 2004 to 2009 at two tertiary centers. Predictors of in-hospital mortality were identified utilizing routine and stepwise logistic regression.

RESULTS

There were a total of 56 patients with mean age of 69 (±13). There were 23 (41%) patients with cardiogenic shock. The mean logistic EuroSCORE was 23.5% ± 21%. In-hospital death occurred in 12 (21%) patients, largely restricted to the shock subgroup (11/12). Univariate predictors of mortality included peak CK levels (P = 0.01), transfusion (P = 0.01), cardiogenic shock (P < 0.002), male gender (P = 0.027), and logistic EuroSCORE (P = 0.01). Stepwise logistic regression yielded logistic EuroSCORE (P = 0.04, OR: 1.25 (95% CI: 1.01-1.56) for every 5% increase) and peak CK level (P = 0.001, OR: 1.23 (95% CI: 1.09-1.40) for every 500 unit increase) as independent predictors of in-hospital mortality. The AUC ROC for logistic EuroSCORE was 0.73; and for logistic EuroSCORE plus peak CK level was 0.89.

CONCLUSION

PCI appears to be a reasonable option in the high risk "no option" LM population, with the logistic EuroSCORE and peak CK levels being independent predictors of in-hospital mortality. Specifically, the logistic EuroSCORE and peak CK level combined discriminate in-hospital mortality with a high degree of certainty.

Immediate and long-term outcomes of drug-eluting stent implantation for unprotected left main coronary artery disease: comparison with bare-metal stent implantation

BACKGROUND

The efficacy and safety of drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation for unprotected left main coronary artery (LMCA) disease remain to be established in different clinical settings.

METHODS

Elective DES implantation for unprotected LMCA stenosis was performed in 220 patients at the Fu Wai Hospital, China, from April 2003 to February 2006. Data derived from the latter group were compared with those derived from 224 patients treated with bare-metal stents (BMSs) before March 2003 in a Chinese registry of unprotected LMCA stenting.

RESULTS

Compared with the historical BMS control group, the DES group had more multivessel disease and underwent more bifurcation stenting. The inhospital major adverse cardiac events were significantly higher in the DES than in the BMS recipients (4.1% vs 0.9%, P = .030) because of more complex lesions and procedures in the DES group. During the 15-month mean follow-up period, cumulative cardiac death (0.5% vs 4.9%, P = .004), target-vessel revascularization (5.9% vs 11.6%, P = .034), and major adverse cardiac event (9.5% vs 16.5%, P = .029) rates were significantly lower in the DES than in the BMS group. There was no significant difference in clinical efficacy between sirolimus- and paclitaxel-eluting stents. Angiographic follow-up was performed in 46.4% of DES and 45.7% of BMS recipients, respectively; and the binary restenosis rate was significantly lower in the DES versus the BMS control group (16.7% vs 31.4%, P = .014).

CONCLUSIONS

Based on this comparison with a historical control, DES implantation for unprotected LMCA appears safe in selected patients and might be more effective in preventing major adverse cardiac events compared with BMS implantation over a mean follow-up period of 15 months.

Results of percutaneous coronary intervention of the unprotected left main coronary artery in 143 patients and comparison of 30-day mortality to results of coronary artery bypass grafting

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of the unprotected left main coronary artery (LMCA) is controversial. In 143 patients who underwent PCI of the unprotected LMCA, 30-day mortality was compared with predicted cumulative risk-adjusted perioperative surgical mortality based on logistic European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation. One-year clinical follow-up was completed in all patients. The overall major adverse cardiac event rate at 1 year was 34.3%, reflecting the high-risk profile of the patient population. Twelve patients (8%) experienced an acute myocardial infarction and 16 (11%) underwent target lesion revascularization. In 31 patients (22%) who died during the first year, median logistic European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation was 30%. Calculated RRs showed significantly lower 30-day mortality using PCI compared with predicted surgical mortality (RR 0.54, 95% confidence interval 0.31 to 0.86). Angiographic follow-up in 90 of the 118 patients alive at 6 months showed binary restenosis of 6% in patients treated with drug-eluting stents versus 29% in patients receiving bare-metal stents (p < or =0.01). In conclusion, PCI for unprotected LMCA disease was associated with acceptable short- and medium-term outcomes in patients at low to intermediate risk of bypass surgery. Mortality remains high in very high-risk patients unsuitable for surgery. However, in selected indications, PCI of the LMCA can offer an alternative to surgery, especially when using drug-eluting stents.

Left main coronary artery stenosis: state-of-the-art

Patients with stenosis of the left main coronary artery present difficult challenges. The risks associated with this lesion have been known since the early days of angiography when patients were found to have increased mortality during follow-up. This information led to the general guidelines that surgical revascularization should be considered the treatment of choice in patients with significant left main coronary artery stenosis. Current advances in invasive cardiology have brought important information to the field. Intravascular ultrasound is now used routinely to evaluate angiographically indeterminate lesions with criteria now set forward as to what constitutes an indication for revascularization. Stents have even further dramatically changed the landscape. There are substantial issues, however, that need to addressed. These include the following: (1) the effect of specific lesion location on outcome - it is known that patients with distal bifurcation left main disease have worse outcome; (2) the potential for subacute thrombosis of the left main coronary artery; (3) the impact of left ventricular function and patient comorbidities irrespective of the degree and location of left main coronary artery stenosis; and (4) the risk-benefit ratio of stenting versus coronary artery bypass graft surgery. These issues are currently being addressed in two seminally important trials including the SYNTAX trial, which randomizes patients with left main and/or three-vessel disease to either coronary artery bypass graft surgery or a TAXUS drug-eluting stent. This trial is in the final stages of patient recruitment and will have important implications for the field. The other trial is the COMBAT trial, which is focused exclusively on left main coronary artery stenosis and randomizes patients with left main coronary artery disease either to a Sirolimus-eluting stent (Cypher, Johnson and Johnson Cordis, USA) or to coronary artery bypass graft surgery. The field of left main coronary artery disease continues to expand in terms of the evidence available for optimal patient evaluation and selection of treatment modalities.

Prevalence of unfavorable angiographic characteristics for percutaneous intervention in patients with unprotected left main coronary artery disease

OBJECTIVES

The goal of this study was to determine the proportion of patients with left main coronary disease (LMCD) with unfavorable characteristics for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

BACKGROUND

Published series suggest that LMCD can be treated percutaneously, however, the proportion of patients in whom PCI is an option based on angiographic criteria is unknown.

METHODS

In 13,228 consecutive coronary angiograms, 476 (3.6%) patients had < or =60% stenosis of the left main. In 232 patients with unprotected LMCD, the clinical characteristics and angiograms were reviewed with six features chosen as "unfavorable" for PCI: (1) Bifurcation LMCD, (2) occlusion of a major coronary, (3) ejection fraction <30%, (4) occlusion of a dominant RCA, (5) left dominant circulation, and (6) coexisting three-vessel disease. Treatment modality and 1 year mortality were determined.

RESULTS

The mean age was 69 years and 68% were male. Unfavorable characteristics were common with at least one unfavorable characteristic seen in 80%. Bifurcation disease was the most common unfavorable characteristic observed (53%) and coexisting three-vessel disease was seen in 38%. Treatment consisted of CABG in 205 (88%), medical therapy in 24 (10%) and PCI in 3 (1%). Among patients referred for CABG, 1 year survival was 88% with similar rates of survival for those with favorable characteristics (86%) compared to those with at least one unfavorable characteristic (88%).

CONCLUSIONS

Most patients with LMCD have at least one unfavorable characteristic for PCI suggesting that PCI may be a technically difficult option for most patients with LMCD.

Technique of left main stenting is dependent on lesion location and distal branch protection

The purpose of this study was to review our experience with left main stenting and evaluate initial results with drug-eluting stents (DESs). Drug-eluting stents delivered with contemporary techniques could change the traditional surgical approach to patients with significant left main disease. One hundred sixty-one patients underwent left main stenting (100 bare metal, 61 drug-eluting) after being excluded from surgery. In group A, disease was confined to the ostium or main stem; in group B, disease involved the bifurcation. Patients were classified as either unprotected (U) or protected (P) depending on the presence of a patent bypass graft. Study endpoints were any major adverse cardiac event (MACE). In-hospital MACE was 6% with no deaths; 74% of patients in group A underwent direct stenting, whereas 89% of the patients in group B had predilatation performed prior to stent implantation. A total of 98% of patients in BU had kissing balloon inflations after stent deployment; provisional side-branch stenting was required in one patient. V-stenting was performed in 13% of patients in group BU. The 1-year mortality in the bare metal stent group was 9% with the majority of deaths in group BU. There was one noncardiac death in the DES group at 6 months and five patients (8.2%) underwent target vessel revascularization for restenosis. Event-free survival at 6 months in group BU treated with DESs was 87%. Significant left main disease presents a spectrum of angiographic abnormalities and different interventional techniques are required depending on lesion location and distal protection. Although in-hospital complications with left main stenting were low in this single-center study, follow-up events were common in patients treated with bare metal stents. A randomized multicenter trial will be required to determine whether drug-eluting stents will improve survival in patients with left main disease.

Long term follow up after elective percutaneous coronary intervention for unprotected non-bifurcational left main stenosis: is it time to change the guidelines?

BACKGROUND

According to the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for left main coronary artery (LMCA) stenosis is contraindicated and coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) is preferred. However, PCI of the LMCA is performed under exceptional circumstances.

OBJECTIVE

To analyse the data of patients who underwent PCI of the unprotected LMCA in St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, Netherlands.

RESULTS

In a database of 17 683 PCI procedures, 71 patients (0.4%) were found with non-bifurcational LMCA stenosis who underwent an elective PCI between 1991 and 2001. Ages ranged from 26.7-86.5 years. Severe concomitant disease was the most frequent argument in favour of PCI instead of CABG. PCI consisted of only balloon angioplasty in 23 cases (32.4%). A stent was used in 46 cases (64.4%). Average follow up was 43 months (range 0-121 months). One patient died one day after the procedure. The total one year survival rate was 98.6% (70/71). Seven patients died during the follow up period, mostly because of non-cardiac reasons. The annual mortality rate was 2.5%. Recurrent elective percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty for restenosis of the LMCA was performed in one patient (1.4%) six weeks after the initial procedure. CABG was required in 13 patients (18.3%) throughout the follow up period.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that at highly experienced centres, elective PCI of the non-bifurcational LMCA can be performed safely where the anatomy is suitable.

Intravascular ultrasound-guided directional coronary atherectomy for unprotected left main coronary stenoses with distal bifurcation involvement

Stent implantation in unprotected left main coronary artery (LMCA) bifurcation lesions may improve procedural and late clinical outcomes. However, concerns regarding stent-related complications, such as stent jail, subacute thrombosis, and in-stent restenosis remain. Optimal debulking by directional coronary atherectomy (DCA) with intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) guidance may be effective in this complex lesion subset, but this strategy has not yet been established. Our objective was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of IVUS-guided DCA for unprotected LMCA stenoses with distal bifurcation involvement. A total of 67 consecutive patients were included in this study and procedural success was achieved in all cases. Two cardiac deaths (2.9%) were noted and 3 patients (4.5%) underwent repeat angioplasty during hospitalization. There was no Q-wave myocardial infarction or emergency bypass surgery. Non-Q-wave myocardial infarction (creatine kinase-MB >3 times normal) occurred in 13.4% of patients. Stent implantation was necessary in 17 cases (25.4%) to achieve an optimal result. IVUS showed an improved lumen cross-sectional area and a low plaque burden in the LMCA after intervention. All-cause mortality, angiographic restenosis, and the target lesion revascularization rates at 6 months were 7.4%, 23.8%, and 20.0%, respectively. With IVUS guidance, aggressive DCA can be performed safely in unprotected LMCA bifurcation lesions, and optimal angiographic and IVUS results can be achieved with low residual plaque burden, which leads to a low restenosis rate. Optimal lesion debulking by DCA does not necessarily need adjunctive stenting in this specific anatomic subset.

Unprotected left main stenting in acute myocardial infarction

Left main stenosis is a rare cause of acute myocardial infarction. Emergent percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) of the left main coronary artery has been shown to have greatly increased procedural and short-term mortality. Stenting decreases the incidence of abrupt closure and has a lower restenosis rate after PTCA. We present a case of a patient presenting in cardiogenic shock due to an acute anterior myocardial infarction who underwent emergent left main coronary artery stenting.

Percutaneous reperfusion of left main coronary disease complicated by acute myocardial infarction

Previous studies have shown a benefit of a strategy of direct angioplasty and stenting in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) complicated by early cardiogenic shock. However, few data exist for the subset of patients with left main trunk disease complicated by AMI and cardiogenic shock. We performed an analysis of patients with AMI who underwent mechanical intervention between January 1995 and December 2000. Out of 1,433 patients with ST segment elevation AMI treated with primary coronary angioplasty (PTCA), 22 patients (1.5%) had left main disease (LMD) as the culprit lesion. Baseline characteristics were age, 66 +/- 11 years; female gender, 9%; diabetes, 14%; previous myocardial infarction, 14%; mean systolic blood pressure, 77 +/- 24 mm Hg; time to treatment, 4.8 +/- 2.2 hr; TIMI 0-1, 77%; collateral flow (Rentrop grade >or= 2) 9%. The primary success rate was 91%. Primary stenting was performed in 17 patients (77%). The in-hospital mortality rate was 50%. All deaths were due to refractory shock. The 6-month survival rate was 41% +/- 1%, while the event-free survival rate was 27% +/- 10%. At 6-month follow-up, the mortality rate increased to 59%; the target vessel revascularization rate was 14%. A percutaneous mechanical intervention strategy in patients with left main disease complicated by AMI is feasible and effective, and patients discharged alive have a good mid-term prognosis.

Short- and long-term results of emergency and elective percutaneous interventions on left main coronary artery stenoses

In this prospective study, we analyzed the short- and long-term outcomes of percutaneous interventions on significant left main coronary artery (LM) stenoses. Between January 1998 and June 2000, 18 patients underwent emergency interventions on unprotected LM stenoses (group 1), while 15 patients had elective interventions on protected LM stenoses (group 2). Despite a procedural success of 88.9% in group 1, event-free in-hospital and mortality rates were 50.0% and 38.9%. After 6.4 +/- 4.4 months of follow-up, late event-free survival and mortality rates were 33.3% and 38.9%. In group 2, procedural success was 100%, with 100% event-free in-hospital survival; late event-free survival and mortality rates were 93.3% and 0% after 6.7 +/- 4.1 months of follow-up. Emergency interventions on LM stenoses remain a procedure with high acute and mid-term mortality. In spite of the high rate of major adverse cardiac events, an acceptable long-term survival can be achieved.

Unprotected left main coronary artery stenting for cardiac allograft vasculopathy

Cardiac allograft vasculopathy is the leading cause of death after the first year of transplantation. Treatment outcomes with medication, balloon angioplasty, bypass surgery, and retransplantation have been disappointing. We present our initial experience with stenting of the left main coronary artery in the setting of allograft vasculopathy.

Unprotected left main coronary artery stenting: correlates of midterm survival and impact of patient selection

BACKGROUND

The study served to present the in-hospital and six-month clinical outcome and also the long-term survival data of a consecutive series of patients undergoing stenting for unprotected left main coronary artery (LMCA) disease.

METHODS

Revascularization with coronary bypass surgery has been generally recommended for treatment of left main coronary stenosis. Improvements in angioplasty and coronary stent techniques and equipment may result in the wider applicability of a percutaneous approach. A total of 92 consecutive patients underwent unprotected LMCA stenting between March 1994 and December 1998. For the initial 39 patients (group I) angioplasty was performed only when surgical revascularization was contraindicated. The remaining 53 patients (group II) also included patients in whom surgery was feasible. Patients were followed for 7.3 +/- 5.8 months (median 239 days; range 49 to 1,477 days).

RESULTS

Compared to group I, group II patients had higher left ventricular ejection fraction (60 +/- 12% vs. 51 +/- 16%, p < 0.01), less severe LMCA stenosis (68 +/- 12% vs. 80 +/- 10%, p < 0.001), lower surgical risk score (13 +/- 7 vs. 20 +/- 7, p < 0.001), and had angioplasty more often performed via the radial approach (88% vs. 23%, p < 0.001) with smaller guiding catheters (6F: 49% vs. 15%; 8F: 2% vs. 77%, p < 0.001). The procedural success rate was 100%. In-hospital mortality was 4% (4 deaths, 3 cardiac). During follow-up there were six deaths, 13 patients required repeat percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (4 LMCA), and two required coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Estimated survival (+/- SEE) was 89 +/- 6.3% at 500 days and 85 +/- 12% at 1,000 days post-stenting. Overall mortality was 3.8% in group II and 20.5% in group I (p < 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Coronary stenting can be performed safely in high-risk individuals with acceptable intermediate-term outcome. It may be feasible to broaden the application of this technique in selected patients needing revascularization for left main coronary disease.

Does unprotected left main-stem stenting have a role in current interventional practice?

Left main-stem disease is found in up to 5% of patients undergoing coronary angiography. Until recently, it has been regarded as an absolute indication for coronary bypass surgery, given the poor results of the early trials of balloon angioplasty for this condition. However, with rapidly advancing technology, including new generation stents and increasingly effective post-stenting anti-thrombotic regimens, there is now an increasing body of evidence to support the consideration of a percutaneous approach to left main-stem disease. Discerning patient selection, meticulous stent sizing and deployment, the routine use of intravascular ultrasound, aggressive anti-platelet regimes, and careful patient follow up are a few of the technical considerations required for a successful long-term outcome in this group.

[Continuous practice and advanced training in interventional cardiology. Recommendations for the assessment and maintenance of proficiency in interventional cardiology. A statement for physicians and advanced training units from the Section of Hemodynamics and Interventional Cardiology of the Spanish Society of Cardiology]

This report reflects the interest of the Section of Hemodynamics and Interventional Cardiology of the Spanish Society of Cardiology in increasing quality, safety and applicability of percutaneous procedures, by giving scientific keys aimed at improving related functions of teaching or planning in this field and enhancing competence and prestige of Spanish interventional cardiologists. The purpose of the document is to describe the importance of current interventional cardiology, to identify quality references and to establish minimum acceptable requirements for assessing and maintaining the competence of practicing or providing advanced training in this discipline. To achieve this goal, a search for a gold standard of the different techniques of general interventional practice was carried out, and predictors of postprocedural outcome were analyzed, as well as their relation with different kinds of circumstances. This analysis identified coronary angioplasty as the standard on which recommendations regarding competence in overall interventional cardiology standards of quality and assessment and maintenance of proficiency must be based. On the other hand, the strong influence of experience and knowledge of results has been documented, especially in high-risk or high-complexity settings. On this basis, the report establishes specific recommendations about proficiency for practice and advanced training. It also suggests that interventional cardiology should be considered as a subspecialty, of cardiology requiring specific credentials.