Optimal criteria for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease by dobutamine stress echocardiography

Variability of longitudinal strain in left ventricular segments supplied by non-stenosed coronary artery: insights from speckle tracking analysis of dobutamine stress echocardiograms in patients with high coronary risk profile

INTRODUCTION

Although global deformation parameters have been increasingly used for myocardial function analysis, there are sparse data concerning segmental deformation of the left ventricle (LV). Moreover, some studies suggest heterogeneity of strain among LV segments, which may be especially significant during stress echocardiography. We assessed quantitatively regional LV function in the setting of dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE), to examine differences of longitudinal strain between basal, mid and apical LV segments and to compare variability of regional deformation between rest and the peak stage of DSE.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Among 250 patients examined by DSE applied for diagnosis of ischemia, a subset of 111 patients without significant coronary stenoses in angiography was selected (68 females, mean age: 60 ±10 years). Systolic longitudinal strain (SLS) in individual LV segments at baseline and the peak stage of DSE was analyzed with speckle tracking echocardiography.

RESULTS

Inhomogeneity of SLS among the LV segments (p < 0.001) was observed at baseline and the peak stage. Dispersion indices were higher at the peak stage of DSE than at baseline (p < 0.001), and the lowest heterogeneity was observed among mid segments. The analysis of changes in SLS during DSE showed SLS reduction in basal and mid-ventricular segments and an increase in apical segments.

CONCLUSIONS

Significant heterogeneity of strain and the opposite direction of the longitudinal strain changes during DSE between apical and basal LV segments were observed. This variability among non-ischemic LV segments ought to be considered in quantification of LV function during DSE.

Improving stress echocardiography accuracy for detecting left circumflex artery stenosis: a new echocardiographic sign?

BACKGROUND

The accuracy and reproducibility of stress echocardiography (SE) for the detection of coronary artery lesions requires improvement, particularly in the left circumflex artery (LCx).

AIMS

To evaluate the feasibility and diagnostic value of a new sign: Rise of the Apical lateral wall and/or Horizontal displacement of the Apex toward the septum ("RA-HA") in apical echocardiographic views.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with normal left ventricular function at rest, positive SE and an indication for coronary angiography were included. SEs were analysed blindly by three independent cardiologists: two seniors (S1 and S2) and one junior (J).

RESULTS

Of 81 patients, 58 had an exercise SE and 23 had a dobutamine SE. Significant coronary stenosis was found in 59 of 77 patients who underwent coronary angiography (76.6%). Interobserver reproducibility for the presence of RA-HA was very good between S1 and S2 (κ = 0.86), and good between S1 and J (0.67) and S2 and J (0.70). The sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive values of RA-HA for the detection of significant coronary artery stenosis were, respectively, 39-41%, 83-89%, 88-92% and 29-31% for S1/S2; and 29%, 83%, 85% and 26% for J. To predict LCx stenosis (single or multivessel): 67-70%, 89%, 80-81% and 80-82% for S1/S2, respectively, and 50%, 89%, 75% and 74% for J.

CONCLUSION

With a short learning curve, RA-HA is easily diagnosed with a very good interobserver reproducibility. It has high specificity and PPV for the detection of a coronary artery stenosis, particularly in the LCx artery, during exercise or dobutamine SE.

Methodological Analysis of Diagnostic Dobutamine Stress Echocardiography Studies

BACKGROUND

Dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) is an accepted test for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease (CAD), despite its wide diagnostic accuracy.

AIM

Which factors cause test variability of DSE for the diagnosis of CAD.

METHODS

In a retrospective analysis of 46 studies in 5,353 patients, the potential causes of diagnostic variability were systematically analyzed, including patient selection, definition of CAD, chest pain characteristics, confounding factors for DSE (left ventricular hypertrophy, left bundle branch block, female gender), work-up bias (present when patient's chance to undergo coronary angiography is influenced by the result of DSE), review bias (present when DSE is interpreted in relation to CAG), DSE protocol and definition of a positive DSE.

RESULTS

Diagnostic variability was related to definition of a positive test, but not related to the definition of CAD or DSE protocol. However, only three of eight methodological standards for research design found general compliance. Differences in the selection of the study population (quality of echocardiographic window, angina pectoris), handling of confounding factors and analysis of disease in individual coronary arteries were observed. Lack of data on analysis of relevant chest pain syndromes and handling of nondiagnostic test results hampered further evaluation of these standards.

CONCLUSION

Methodological problems may explain the wide range in diagnostic variability of DSE. An improvement of clinical relevance of DSE testing is possible by stronger adherence to common and new methodological standards.

Factors affecting sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic testing: dobutamine stress echocardiography

BACKGROUND

Clinical characteristics of patients, angiographic referral bias, and several technical factors may all affect the reported diagnostic accuracy of tests. The aim of this study was to assess their influence on the diagnostic accuracy of dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE).

METHODS

The medical literature from 1991 to 2006 was searched for diagnostic studies using DSE and meta-analysis was applied to the 62 studies thus retrieved, including 6881 patients. These studies were analyzed for patient characteristics, angiographic referral bias, and several technical factors.

RESULTS

The sensitivity of DSE was significantly related to the inclusion of patients with prior myocardial infarctions (0.834 vs 0.740, P < .01) and defining the results of DSE as already positive in case of resting wall motion abnormalities rather than obligatory myocardial ischemia (0.786 vs 0.864, P < .01). Specificity tended to be lower when patients with resting wall motion abnormalities were included in a study (0.812 vs 0.877, P < .10). The presence of referral bias adversely affected the specificity of DSE (0.771 vs 0.842, P < .01).

CONCLUSION

This analysis suggests that the reported sensitivity of DSE is likely higher and the specificity lower than expected in routine clinical practice because of the inappropriate inclusion of patients with prior myocardial infarctions, the definition of positive results on DSE, and the negative influence of referral bias. However, in the patient subset that will be sent to coronary angiography, the opposite results can be expected.

Recent advances in dobutamine stress echocardiography

Dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) is a reliable cardiac risk stratifier that has widespread applicability because of its clinical accuracy and cost effectiveness. Dobutamine has positive inotropic and chronotropic effects and is commonly used in patients who cannot exercise or achieve an adequate heart rate response with exercise. Recently available long-term results from several independent clinical trials, combined with enhancements in image quality, have improved the ability to detect significant coronary artery disease and determine myocardial viability. Dobutamine stress echocardiography has an excellent safety profile with clinical results superior to regular exercise electrocardiography and comparable with exercise echocardiography and radionucleotide perfusion stress imaging. Low-dose dobutamine response can accurately predict dysfunctional yet viable myocardial regions that may improve with revascularization. Clinical studies are now available refining the common use of DSE preoperatively in female patients with valvular disease, as well as in the emergency department. Dobutamine stress echocardiography does have some limitations in discriminating particular regions of ischemia when multiple ventricular segments are involved and when the imaging is suboptimal. It can be applied using minimal additional resources in an otherwise functioning echocardiography laboratory and, with appropriate training, can result in clinical results comparable with those of large-scale multicenter trials. Ongoing improvements in technology and the development of new reagents such as myocardial contrast agents hold promise for further advancement in the near future.

Impact of individual and cumulative coronary risk factors on coronary flow reserve assessed by dobutamine stress echocardiography

Traditional cardiovascular risk factors have been shown to cause microvascular dysfunction. Most studies that have evaluated microcirculation rely on invasive measurement tools. We used dobutamine stress echocardiography, a validated method to measure coronary flow velocity (CFV) and coronary flow reserve (CFR), in a previously unstudied population without known significant coronary artery disease to determine the impact of traditional risk factors on CFR. Consecutive patients who had no evidence of regional wall motion abnormalities at rest or during dobutamine stress echocardiography were studied. Left anterior descending artery CFV was measured at baseline and at peak dobutamine stress and CFR was calculated as the ratio of peak stress CFV to baseline CFV. Fifty-nine consecutive patients (28 men) with mean age of 66.8+/-14.5 years were studied. CFR was lower in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) compared with those without (1.7+/-0.74 vs 2.48+/-0.98, p<0.007), in patients with hypertension compared with those without (2+/-0.8 vs 2.6+/-0.9, p<0.02), and in obese patients compared with nonobese patients (1.6+/-0.5 vs 2+/-0.6, p<0.02). CFR was further impaired in the presence of DM with hypertension, DM with obesity, DM with a wide pulse pressure (>50 mm Hg), and obesity with a wide pulse pressure. In a multivariate model, DM, obesity, and wide pulse pressure were significantly associated with variation in CFR (p<0.0008). In conclusion, CFR was abnormal in patients with DM, hypertension, and obesity. CFR impairment is exaggerated as the number of risk factors increases. Despite a negative dobutamine stress echocardiographic result, aggressive risk factor assessment and control should be implemented in patients with coronary risk factors due to an underlying abnormal CFR.

Mechanisms of regional wall motion abnormalities in contrast-enhanced Dobutamine Stress Echocardiography

BACKGROUND

In the diagnosis of coronary artery disease (CAD) with Dobutamine Stress Echocardiography (DSE), regional wall motion abnormalities (RWMA) are assumed to indicate a perfusion deficit.

METHODS AND RESULTS

For a more particular examination of RWMAs, we compared simultaneous echo-contrast (Optisone)-enhanced DSE (0-40 microg/kg Dobutamine, 16-segment- model) and MiBi-SPECT in a prospective double-blinded study design in 69 non-selected consecutive patients (44 male, 25 female, age 64+/-12 years). Additionally, all patients were examined by coronary-angiography. The prevalence of significant CAD (stenosis >50% lumen diameter) was 52%. DSE had a sensitivity of 78% and a specificity of 66% for the detection of significant CAD with a positive and negative predictive value of 72 and 73%, respectively. Among 28 patients with significant CAD and positive DSE study (true positive), 78% displayed a corresponding perfusion deficit in MiBi-SPECT. Among 11 patients with a positive DSE study but no current significant coronary stenosis (false positive), 82% showed stress-induced RWMAs in the inferior/posterior region, 73% displayed left ventricular hypertrophy, 54% resting-ECG abnormalities and 45% resting-RWMA (3 previous MI, 2 previous CABG surgery). Among 8 patients with negative DSE study but significant coronary stenosis (false negative), 75% had a stenosis of the LCX, 63% displayed resting- WMA, 63% displayed left bundle branch block or ST-segment depression, 50% displayed only peripheral coronary stenosis, and DSE visualization was suboptimal in 38%.

CONCLUSION

This prospective study in non-selected patients shows that the majority of RWMAs in DSE are matched to a perfusion deficit detectable by nuclear imaging. Nevertheless, pre-existing cardiac abnormalities may also lead to stress-induced RWMA not associated with a perfusion deficit or mask a perfusion deficit upon DSE. Particularly in patients with LV hypertrophy, resting-RWMA, bundle branch block or ST segment depression, the predictive value of DSE may, therefore, be limited.

Enhanced sensitivity of dobutamine stress echocardiography by observing wall motion abnormalities during the recovery phase after acute beta-blocker administration

Dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) has a modest sensitivity for detecting single-vessel coronary artery disease (CAD). This study assessed the additional diagnostic value of new or worsening wall motion abnormalities during recovery after acute administration of beta blockers. The study population consisted of 200 patients (mean 59 +/- 11 years of age, 144 men), who underwent DSE. Images were acquired at rest, low dose, peak dose, and during recovery. Patients received intravenous metoprolol (1 to 5 mg/min). The dose was adjusted to achieve a recovery heart rate within a 10% range of heart rate at rest. Coronary angiography was performed within 2 months. Inducible new wall motion abnormalities were observed in 168 patients (84%) at peak stress. An additional 14 patients (7%) developed new or worsening wall motion abnormalities during recovery. CAD was detected in 182 patients (86 had single-vessel CAD). Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of DSE were 88%, 65%, and 73% at peak stress and 97%, 65%, and 74% during recovery. Sensitivity was particularly higher during recovery than during peak stress in patients with single-vessel CAD (98% vs 81%, p <0.001). In conclusion, assessment of wall motion abnormalities during the recovery phase after acute beta blockade improves sensitivity of DSE, particularly in patients with single-vessel CAD.

A meta-analytic comparison of echocardiographic stressors

BACKGROUND

The relative performance of alternative stressors for stress echocardiography for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease (CAD) is not well established.

METHODS

All studies published between 1981 to December 2001 who met inclusion criteria were included in this analysis. We performed a summary receiver operator characteristic (SROC) analysis and calculated weighted mean of the likelihood ratio and sensitivity/specificity. A covariate analysis using meta-regression methods was also performed.

RESULTS

Forty-four studies presented data on Exercise, 11 on Adenosine, 80 on Dobutamine, 40 on Dipyridamole, 16 on transatrial pacing transesophageal echocardiography (Tap-TEE), and 7 on transatrial pacing transthorasic echocardiography (Tap-TTE). SROC analysis showed that the following order of most discriminatory to least: Tap-TEE, Exercise, Dipyridamole, Dobutamine and Adenosine. Weighted means sensitivity/specificity were Exercise: 82.6/84.4%, Adenosine: 68.4/80.9%, Dobutamine: 79.6/85.1%, Dipyridamole: 71.0/92.2%, Tap-TTE: 90.7/86.1%, and Tap-TEE: 86.2/91.3%. Covariate analysis showed that the discriminatory power of Exercise decreased with increasing mean age.

CONCLUSIONS

Tap-TEE is a very accurate test for both ruling in and ruling out CAD although its invasiveness may limit its clinical acceptability. Exercise is a well-balanced satisfactory test for both ruling in and ruling out but performance might be lower for the elderly. Dobutamine offers a reasonable compromise for Exercise. Dipyridamole might be good for ruling in but not for ruling out CAD. The incapability in ruling-out CAD was a major problem in clinical application of the stress. Adenosine was the least useful stressor in diagnosing CAD.

Clinical and prognostic implications of angina pectoris developing during dobutamine stress echocardiography in the absence of inducible wall motion abnormalities

This study assessed the incidence, clinical correlates, and prognostic significance of angina during dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) in patients who did not have inducible wall motion abnormalities. We studied 2,117 patients (61 +/- 13 years of age; 1,149 men) who underwent large-dose DSE and had no new or worsening wall motion abnormalities during DSE. Follow-up events were hard cardiac events (cardiac death or nonfatal myocardial infarction) and myocardial revascularization. Angina was induced in 217 patients (10%) during stress. DSE was normal in 1,198 patients (57%), whereas 919 patients (43%) had fixed wall motion abnormalities. During a mean follow-up of 5.5 +/- 3.7 years, 143 patients (7%) died of cardiac causes and 78 (4%) had nonfatal myocardial infarction. Patients who developed angina during DSE were more likely to have a history of exertional angina (64% vs 16%, p <0.001) and had a higher wall motion score index at rest (1.29 +/- 0.5 vs 1.17 +/- 0.4, p = 0.01) compared with patients who did not have angina. Annual hard cardiac event rates were 2.2% in patients who had dobutamine-induced angina (DIA) and 2.1% in patients who did not (p = NS). Myocardial revascularization was performed more frequently in patients who had DIA than in those who did not (39% vs 14%, p <0.0001). In Cox's regression model, independent predictors of hard events were age (RR 1.03, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02 to 1.04), male gender (RR 1.6, 95% CI 1.1 to 2.2), smoking (RR 1.5, 95% CI 1.1 to 2.9), and wall motion score index at rest (RR 2.6, 95% CI 1.8 to 3.8). In conclusion, in patients who do not have ischemia by echocardiographic criteria during DSE, inducible angina pectoris is associated with a high incidence of revascularization during follow-up. However, the hard cardiac event rate does not differ in patients who develop DIA from those who do not.

Catheter-based intramyocardial injection of autologous skeletal myoblasts as a primary treatment of ischemic heart failure: clinical experience with six-month follow-up

OBJECTIVES

We report on the procedural and six-month results of the first percutaneous and stand-alone study on myocardial repair with autologous skeletal myoblasts.

BACKGROUND

Preclinical studies have shown that skeletal myoblast transplantation to injured myocardium can partially restore left ventricular (LV) function.

METHODS

In a pilot safety and feasibility study of five patients with symptomatic heart failure (HF) after an anterior wall infarction, autologous skeletal myoblasts were obtained from the quadriceps muscle and cultured in vitro for cell expansion. After a culturing process, 296 +/- 199 million cells were harvested (positive desmin staining 55 +/- 30%). With a NOGA-guided catheter system (Biosense-Webster, Waterloo, Belgium), 196 +/- 105 million cells were transendocardially injected into the infarcted area. Electrocardiographic and LV function assessment was done by Holter monitoring, LV angiography, nuclear radiography, dobutamine stress echocardiography, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

RESULTS

All cell transplantation procedures were uneventful, and no serious adverse events occurred during follow-up. One patient received an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator after transplantation because of asymptomatic runs of nonsustained ventricular tachycardia. Compared with baseline, the LV ejection fraction increased from 36 +/- 11% to 41 +/- 9% (3 months, p = 0.009) and 45 +/- 8% (6 months, p = 0.23). Regional wall analysis by MRI showed significantly increased wall thickening at the target areas and less wall thickening in remote areas (wall thickening at target areas vs. 3 months follow-up: 0.9 +/- 2.3 mm vs. 1.8 +/- 2.4 mm, p = 0.008).

CONCLUSIONS

This pilot study is the first to demonstrate the potential and feasibility of percutaneous skeletal myoblast delivery as a stand-alone procedure for myocardial repair in patients with post-infarction HF. More data are needed to confirm its safety.

Prognostic significance of the location of wall motion abnormalities during exercise echocardiography

OBJECTIVES

Our aim was to determine whether location of wall motion abnormalities (WMAs) during exercise echocardiography provides independent prognostic value.

BACKGROUND

The effect of the location of WMAs during stress echocardiography on prognostic outcome is unknown.

METHODS

We studied 4,347 patients (mean age, 61 +/- 12 years; 2,230 men) with known or suspected coronary artery disease by symptom-limited exercise echocardiography. An abnormal result was defined as resting or exercise-induced WMA. End points were cardiac death and nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI).

RESULTS

There were 133 cardiac events (54 cardiac deaths and 79 nonfatal MIs) during follow-up (median, three years). In a multiple-stepwise multivariate analysis model, clinical and exercise electrocardiography predictors of cardiac events were age, gender, hypertension, typical chest pain, previous MI, smoking, and resting ejection fraction. The percentage of ischemic segments at peak exercise provided additional information to the model (p = 0.0001). The presence of abnormalities in the left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery distribution had an additional independent effect for the prediction of cardiac events (p = 0.001). Among patients with exercise echocardiographic abnormalities in a single vascular region, those with abnormalities in the left anterior descending coronary artery distribution had a higher event rate than patients with abnormalities elsewhere (3.2% vs. 2.1% at three years and 10.8% vs. 2.1% at five years; p = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS; Exercise WMAs in the distribution of the LAD coronary artery are associated with an increased risk of cardiac death and nonfatal MI. This risk is independent of the resting ejection fraction and the extent of WMAs during exercise.

Use of pharmaceuticals in noninvasive cardiovascular diagnosis

A number of pharmaceuticals are employed as diagnostic agents for cardiovascular diseases. Four groups of agents are reviewed here: 1) vasoactive substances employed as adjuncts to physical maneuvers in diagnosis of structural heart disease; 2) vasodilators used to produce heterogeneity of coronary flow; 3) sympathomimetic agents simulating the effects of exercise on the heart for the purpose of detection of coronary artery stenosis; and 4) ultrasonic contrast agents used to enhance myocardial imaging for the assessment of segmental wall motion. In the first group are amyl nitrate, a vasodilator, and methoxamine and phenylephrine, both vasopressors. The vasodilators of the second group are dipyridamole and adenosine. When combined with scintigraphic perfusion imaging or with echocardiographic assessment of segmental wall motion, these agents can detect single- or multiple-vessel coronary artery disease with sensitivity and specificity comparable to submaximal exercise. They are especially useful for preoperative risk assessment before noncardiac surgery. The sympathomimetic agents of the third group, dobutamine and arbutamine, increase myocardial contractility and heart rate, and dilate the peripheral vasculature. As with the vasodilators, when combined with nuclear or echocardiographic techniques they are equivalent to exercise in detection of coronary disease. They are especially useful in patients with bronchospastic disease and for assessment of myocardial viability. Agents from groups 2 and 3 have acceptable side-effect and safety profiles. The last group reviewed includes echocardiographic contrast agents that, in this investigative setting, are employed to enhance detection of segmental wall motion when used with agents from groups 2 and 3.

Improved identification of viable myocardium using second harmonic imaging during dobutamine stress echocardiography

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether, compared with fundamental imaging, second harmonic imaging can improve the accuracy of dobutamine stress echocardiography for identifying viable myocardium, using nuclear imaging as a reference.

PATIENTS

30 patients with chronic left ventricular dysfunction (mean (SD) age, 60 (8) years; 22 men).

METHODS

Dobutamine stress echocardiography was carried out in all patients using both fundamental and second harmonic imaging. All patients underwent dual isotope simultaneous acquisition single photon emission computed tomography (DISA-SPECT) with (99m)technetium-tetrofosmin/(18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose on a separate day. Myocardial viability was considered present by dobutamine stress echocardiography when segments with severe dysfunction showed a biphasic sustained improvement or an ischaemic response. Viability criteria on DISA-SPECT were normal or mildly reduced perfusion and metabolism, or perfusion/metabolism mismatch.

RESULTS

Using fundamental imaging, 330 segments showed severe dysfunction at baseline; 144 (44%) were considered viable. The agreement between dobutamine stress echocardiography by fundamental imaging and DISA-SPECT was 78%, kappa = 0.56. Using second harmonic imaging, 288 segments showed severe dysfunction; 138 (48%) were viable. The agreement between dobutamine stress echocardiography and DISA-SPECT was significantly better when second harmonic imaging was used (89%, kappa = 0.77, p = 0.001 v fundamental imaging).

CONCLUSIONS

Second harmonic imaging applied during dobutamine stress echocardiography increases the agreement with DISA-SPECT for detecting myocardial viability.

Second harmonic imaging improves sensitivity of dobutamine stress echocardiography for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease

OBJECTIVE

Our purpose was to assess the value of second harmonic imaging compared with fundamental imaging for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease during dobutamine stress echocardiography.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Sixty-four patients underwent dobutamine stress echocardiography with both fundamental imaging and second harmonic imaging. Coronary angiography was performed within 3 months. Ischemia was defined as new or worsening wall motion abnormalities in > or = 1 segment during dobutamine stress echocardiography. Coronary artery disease was defined as a > or = 70% luminal diameter stenosis in > or = 1 coronary artery by coronary angiography.

RESULTS

There was a higher prevalence of segments with invisible border with fundamental compared with second harmonic imaging both at rest (11% vs 8%, P < .05) and at peak stress (17% vs 10%, P < .001). Significant coronary artery disease was present in 49 (77%) patients. The sensitivity of dobutamine stress echocardiography for detection of coronary artery disease by fundamental and second harmonic imaging was, respectively, 78% and 94% (P < .05), whereas specificity was similar (73% vs 73%). Second harmonic imaging had a particularly higher sensitivity for the diagnosis of 1-vessel disease (93% vs 50%, P < .05).

CONCLUSION

The use of second harmonic imaging improves the sensitivity of dobutamine stress echocardiography for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease compared with fundamental imaging, particularly for 1-vessel coronary artery disease, whereas specificity remains unchanged.

Non-invasive investigations

The most commonly used techniques for imaging the effects of coronary artery disease (CAD) on the heart are myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (MPS) and echocardiography. Both tests have been validated during exercise and pharmacological stress and they are valuable for the diagnosis and aiding management decisions in patients with suspected or known CAD. In a proportion of these patients, repetitive episodes of myocardial ischaemia can lead to intracellular and extracellular changes so that myocytes, although viable, have insufficient energy to sustain contraction. This phenomenon is known as myocardial hibernation and it can be detected accurately by both MPS and stress echocardiography. The review that follows highlights the role of these techniques as powerful diagnostic and prognostic tools in clinical cardiology. In order to make the best use of them, attention to detail and planning are required to design the test to suit the clinical problem and to obtain the most accurate data possible.

Does second harmonic imaging improve left ventricular endocardial border identification at higher heart rates during dobutamine stress echocardiography?

BACKGROUND

The increased heart rate during dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) may impair endocardial border visualization. Second harmonic imaging (SHI) enhances left ventricular (LV) border visualization compared with conventional fundamental imaging (FI) at rest. However, its role during DSE is not well established yet.

OBJECTIVE

Our objective was to compare the additional value of SHI to FI for the LV endocardial border visualization during various stages of DSE.

METHODS

Eighty patients underwent DSE. Imaging was performed with both FI and SHI at rest and at low-and peak-dose dobutamine infusion. Endocardial border visualization was assessed by using a 16-segment/3-point score (0 = well visualized; 1 = poorly visualized; 2 = not visualized).

RESULTS

Heart rate increased from rest (70 +/- 13 bpm) to low-dose dobutamine (77 +/- 17, P <.01) and showed further increase at peak dose (129 +/- 16, P <.001 versus low dose). There was a higher prevalence of segments with an invisible LV endocardial border with FI compared with SHI at rest (9.4% versus 6.2%, P <.0001), at low dose (10.8% versus 6.3%, P <.0001), and at peak dose (15.0% versus 8.2%, P <.0001). There was an increase in the number of segments with an invisible border from rest to peak stress by FI (P =.0001), whereas the difference was less significant for SHI (P =.07).

CONCLUSION

Second harmonic imaging improves visualization of the LV endocardial border compared with FI during DSE. The advantage of SHI over FI is more marked at higher heart rates than at rest.

Significance of resting wall motion abnormalities in 2-dimensional echocardiography in patients without previous myocardial infarction referred for pharmacologic stress testing

BACKGROUND

Resting wall motion abnormalities (WMA) in 2-dimensional echocardiography may be encountered in patients without previous myocardial infarction or known coronary artery disease (CAD) who are referred for stress testing. However, the functional significance of these abnormalities has not been evaluated by an independent technique. The goals of this study were to assess the value of resting WMA in the prediction of an ischemic response during dobutamine stress testing independent of other clinical characteristics in patients without known CAD, and to evaluate whether the presence of resting WMA is related to the presence or extent of myocardial perfusion abnormalities during dobutamine stress testing.

METHODS

We studied 116 patients (mean age 57 +/- 13 years, 50 men) without known CAD or a history of myocardial infarction by dobutamine-atropine (dobutamine: </=40 microg/kg/min; atropine: </=1 mg) stress echocardiography and simultaneous stress and rest technetium sestamibi single-photon emission computed tomography imaging. Ischemia was defined as new or worsening wall motion abnormalities and reversible perfusion defects, respectively.

RESULTS

Resting WMA were detected in 24 patients (21%). Patients with resting WMA had a higher prevalence of abnormal perfusion (75% vs 25%, P <.001) and a higher prevalence of ischemia by single-photon emission computed tomography (50% vs 24%, P <.05) and by echocardiography (42% vs 9%, P <.001) compared with patients without resting WMA, respectively. Stress and rest perfusion defect scores were significantly higher in patients with than in those without rest WMA (3.25 +/- 2.67 vs 0.88 +/- 1.77, P <.0001; and 1.46 +/- 1.69 vs 0.21 +/- 0.70, P <.0001; respectively). Independent predictors of the occurrence of ischemia by echocardiography were the presence of resting WMA (P <.01, chi(2) = 6.7), ST-segment depression (P <.005, chi(2) = 11.3), and angina during the test (P <. 05, chi(2) = 5.3) by using multivariate analysis of clinical and stress test variables. The presence of resting WMA was the only independent predictor of an abnormal perfusion (P <.0001, chi(2) = 20).

CONCLUSION

The presence of resting WMA in patients without known CAD or a previous myocardial infarction who were referred for pharmacologic stress testing is highly predictive of abnormal myocardial perfusion. Resting WMA are powerful independent predictors of an ischemic response during dobutamine stress testing and identify a population with a higher prevalence and extent of myocardial perfusion abnormalities.