Effects of exercise on Doppler-derived pressure difference, valve resistance, and effective orifice area in different aortic valve prostheses of similar size

Aortic valve opening in mock-loop with continuous-flow left ventricular assist device

The appropriate opening of aortic valves is crucial for heart failure (HF) patients with left ventricular assist devices (LVADs). Nevertheless, up to the present time, aortic valve monitoring has not been performed in discharged patients. In this study, a mock-loop platform was developed to investigate the aortic valve performance in LVAD patients. An additional sluice valve was placed next to the aortic valve that when the sluice valve is manually closed, the aortic valve will remain closed; when the sluice valve is open, the aortic valve is opened or closed upon the pressures. The results showed that when the LVAD speed was below 2600 rpm, the aortic valve can be intermittently opened, while when the LVAD speed was over 2600 rpm, the aortic valve was persistently closed. The left ventricular end-systolic pressure (LVESP) was found to be an indicator of aortic valve closure that, upon the aortic valve closure LVESP suddenly decreased. The LVESP is suggested for future monitoring the status of the aortic valve for patients with implanted LVADs. The effects of heart failure (HF) degrees, circulation resistance, and aortic compliance on aortic valve closure were further studied. The results revealed that LVAD implantation in patients with early HF degrees will help to avoid persistent aortic valve closure.

Early Hemodynamics after Aortic Valve Replacement

Background and objectives: The aims of this study were to investigate changes in the hemodynamics associated with different types of aortic prostheses and to evaluate patient-prosthesis mismatch (PPM) at rest and after exercise. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 150 patients who presented with indications for aortic valve replacement (AVR) with/without concomitant surgery from March 2019 to January 2020. The study population included 90 (60%) men and 60 (40%) women (mean age, 67.33 ± 10.22 years; range, 37-88 years). Echocardiography data such as peak and mean transprosthetic pressure gradients (Gmax, Gmean), velocity (V), effective orifice area (EOA), and indexed EOA (iEOA) were derived at rest and after exercise at baseline and before discharge. The study patients performed the six-minute walk test (6MWT) on the 5th-7th postoperative day. Results: Stented tissue valves showed excellent performance at rest and after exercise in comparison with mechanical valves, which showed favorable hemodynamics at rest only. At the time of discharge, moderate PPM was observed in 7/74 patients (9.5%) at rest and 5/98 (3.3%) patients after exercise. None of the patients showed severe PPM. EOA and iEOA were not significantly different between the groups. However, the stented group showed more pronounced changes in EOA and iEOA after exercise, whereas the changes in the mechanical valve group did not reach significance. Conclusions: In the early postoperative period, mechanical valves and stented valves showed favorable resting hemodynamics. The PPM rate measured after exercise was lower than that at rest.

Different Types of Aortic Stenosis and Simulation of their Morphological-Hydrodynamic Interdependence - in Vitro Study with Allografts and Stenotic Valve Models

Biological valves display a dependence of valve resistance and valve area on flow and a phase shift between systolic flow through the valves and pressure difference across the valves. The pressure-flow relations of stenosed valves raise questions about the “best measure of stenosis”. There is a need for quantitative evaluation of the hydrodynamic performance of homografts and allografts. In the present paper, we report on in vitro studies of the hydrodynamic behavior of homografts from human donors, allografts from different animal species as well as three valve models. Valve model I was designed to simulate flow-dependence of valve area, valve model II was designed to simulate restricted valve opening independent of flow, and valve model III was designed to simulate a flow-dependent movement of valve root in flow direction. Among other aspects, the effect of increased viscosity of the test fluid on the pressure difference and the effects of water absorption by valve tissue on valve characteristics were investigated. The results of the present studies clearly indicate that any biological valve may be modelled as a serial connection of a model I type valve and a model II type valve. From the results, the dependence of the characteristic pressure-flow relationship of a valve on valve size and valve distensibility can be clearly seen and the clinical significance of the characteristic coefficients of the pressure-flow relationship of a valve can be elucidated. Further, it was shown that the characteristic phase shift between flow and pressure difference displayed by biological valves is due to their movable valve plane similar to that of valve model III.

Rest and Exercise Performance of the Medtronic Advantage Bileaflet Valve in the Aortic Position

BACKGROUND

The aim of the study was to evaluate rest and exercise performance and left ventricular mass regression of the Medtronic Advantage (Medtronic, Inc, Minneapolis, MN) prosthesis in the aortic position at 1 year at a single center as part of a multicenter, prospective clinical trial.

METHODS

Between May 2002 and June 2003, 63 consecutive patients underwent aortic valve replacement with a Medtronic Advantage prosthesis (84.1% male; mean age, 56.0 +/- 9.7 years; ejection fraction, 56.5 +/- 15.8%). Valve lesions were stenosis (n = 20), mixed (n = 34), and insufficiency (n = 9). Concomitant procedures were performed in 34.9%. Follow-up was 100% complete. Echocardiographic data were obtained early postoperatively and at 1 year, combined with stress echocardiography by treadmill. Mean pressure gradients, stroke volume, and left ventricular mass were determined by echocardiography. Data are presented as mean +/- standard deviation.

RESULTS

Operative mortality was 0%. Valve-related complications were observed in 2 patients (endocarditis, n = 1; thromboembolic event, n = 1). There was no case of antithromboembolic hemorrhage, prosthesis-related explant, or reoperation. One patient showed moderate paravalvular regurgitation. Mean pressure gradients 1 year postoperatively ranged from 6.3 to 11.0 mm Hg across all valve sizes. Left ventricular mass regression at 1 year was 18.4% across all valve sizes (p < 0.001). No severe patient-prosthesis mismatch (effective orifice area index < or = 0.65 cm2/m2) could be observed.

CONCLUSIONS

After 1 year, the Medtronic Advantage valve shows comparable transvalvular mean pressure gradients across the valve sizes used during rest and exercise. This is accompanied by a significant left ventricular mass regression, an important indicator for long-term survival.

Small “Functional” Size after Mechanical Aortic Valve Replacement: No Risk in Young to Middle-Age Patients

BACKGROUND

The impact of a valve prosthesis-patient size mismatch is still controversial. In most studies, the inclusion of a large proportion of poorly active old patients with low cardiac output requirements may be misleading, due to the close correlation between trans-prosthetic gradients and cardiac output. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of small "functional" prosthesis sizes in active young to middle-age patients.

METHODS

Eighty-three active patients with a mean age of 46 +/- 8 years and a high health survey questionnaire score were followed for 80 +/- 34 months after isolated aortic valve replacement with a mechanical prosthesis.

RESULTS

Patients with an indexed, Doppler derived, effective orifice area index less than 0.85 cm2/m2 (0.77 +/- 0.1 cm2/m2) showed higher early trans-prosthetic gradients (peak, 34 +/- 11 vs 26 +/- 8 mm Hg; P = 0.001) than patients with a larger effective orifice area index. However, significant regression of the left ventricular mass index and improvement of the left ventricular ejection fraction were observed in both groups at follow-up (119.8 +/- 26 vs 165.2 +/- 38 g/m2 and 128.5 +/- 25 vs 181.8 +/- 50 g/m2; P < 0.001; 58 +/- 6 vs 52 +/- 11% and 58 +/- 7 vs 53 +/- 10%; P < 0.001), with no differences between groups (P = 0.4 and P = 0.7, respectively). At multiple linear regression, the final left ventricular mass index was positively related to the preoperative left ventricular mass index (P = 0.004) and was unaffected by the effective orifice area index (P = 0.4). Symptomatic improvement (New York Heart Association class 1.3 +/- 0.4 vs 2.4 +/- 0.8 and 1.2 +/- 0.4 vs 2.2 +/- 0.8; P < 0.001) and freedom from late cardiac death (93 +/- 3% and 95 +/- 6%) were comparable between groups (P = 0.6 and P = 0.7, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings indicate that small "functional" prosthesis sizes with modern mechanical valves may not adversely affect outcomes of aortic valve replacement in young patients with high cardiac output requirements.

Further insights into normal aortic valve function: role of a compliant aortic root on leaflet opening and valve orifice area

BACKGROUND

This study aims to find the fundamental differences in the mechanism of opening and closing of a normal aortic valve and a valve with a stiff root, using a dynamic finite element model.

METHODS

A dynamic, finite element model with time varying pressure was used in this study. Shell elements with linear elastic properties for the leaflet and root were used. Two different cases were analyzed: (1) normal leaflets inside a compliant root, and (2) normal leaflets inside a stiff root.

RESULTS

A compliant aortic root contributes substantially to the smooth and symmetrical leaflet opening with minimal gradients. In contrast, the leaflet opening inside a stiff root is delayed, asymmetric, and wrinkled. However, this wrinkling is not associated with increased leaflet stresses. In compliant roots, the effective valve orifice area can substantially increase because of increased root pressure and transvalvular gradients. In stiff roots this effect is strikingly absent.

CONCLUSIONS

A compliant aortic root contributes substantially to smooth and symmetrical leaflet opening with minimal gradients. The compliance also contributes much to the ability of the normal aortic valve to increase its effective valve orifice in response to physiologic demands of exercise. This effect is strikingly absent in stiff roots.

Early results of a new mechanical tri-leaflet heart valve prosthesis--"Tricusp": an animal study

OBJECTIVE

A new tri-leaflet mechanical heart valve made of titanium was inserted in the mitral position to evaluate early results.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Five sheep were followed between 3 and 6 months (mean 4.7 months) and performed very well clinically during the follow-up period. In three of five animals a minor para-valvular leakage without hemodynamic importance was observed. The invasive pressure measurements at the end of follow-up revealed only minor transvalvular pressure differences between 1 and 4 mmHg (mean 2.4 mmHg). Similar results were obtained by echo-Doppler technique. Histological examination of the tissue around the valve showed no signs of foreign body reaction or chronic inflammatory reaction.

CONCLUSION

This new tri-leaflet heart valve has shown an excellent hemodynamic performance and good tissue compatibility, and therefore may be an alternative to other currently used valve prostheses.

Use of stentless xenografts in the aortic position: determinants of early and late outcome

BACKGROUND

Whether to perform a stentless aortic valve replacement (AVR) is not well established. Our aim was to determine the outcome after AVR with stentless xenograft valves.

METHODS

Between 1996 and 2001, a total of 404 patients (mean age 70.4 years) underwent a stentless AVR by one surgeon in our unit. Concomitant procedures were performed in 132 patients (33%). Twenty patients (6.4%) had undergone previous AVR. Eleven types of stentless xenograft valves were implanted: Medtronic Freestyle in 221 patients (55%), Shelhigh in 55 (14%), Shelhigh composite conduit in 33 (8%), Sorin in 26 (6%), Cryolife O'Brien in 25 (6%), Aortech-Elan in 17 (4%), Edwards Prima in 14 (4%), Toronto SPV in 7 (2%), and other valves in 6 (1%). A subcoronary implantation technique was used in 302 cases (76%), complete root replacement in 62 (15%), and a modified Bentall-De Bono procedure in 33 (8%). Mean follow-up was 19.4 months (range, 1.2 to 60.6 months).

RESULTS

Overall hospital mortality was 4.2%. This was 2.4% for isolated AVR, 3.6% for AVR and coronary artery bypass grafting, 5.5% for replacement of two or more valves, and 12% for the modified Bentall procedure. On multiple logistic regression redo cardiac operation (p = 0.0006), cardiogenic shock (p = 0.001), left ventricular ejection fraction less than 0.30 (p = 0.01), modified Bentall procedure (p = 0.03), and endocarditis (p = 0.04) were predictors of in-hospital death. Five-year freedom from thromboembolism, hemorrhage, prosthetic endocarditis, structural valve deterioration, and reoperation was 97%, 99%, 99%, 98%, and 96%, respectively. Kaplan-Meier survival at 5 years was 88%. On Cox regression, cardiogenic shock (p = 0.001) and older age (p = 0.03) were adverse predictors of survival. At echocardiographic examination within 6 months from the operation, mean aortic valve gradients were 15 +/- 6 mm Hg, 12.8 +/- 3 mm Hg, 10.8 +/- 4 mm Hg, 9.3 +/- 3 mm Hg, 9.1 +/- 4 mm Hg, and 8.2 +/- 3 mm Hg for valve sizes of 19, 21, 23, 25, 27, and 29 mm, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The availability of several stentless valve designs facilitates the surgical treatment of diverse aortic valve or root diseases with encouraging early and mid-term results. Patients requiring concomitant procedures may also benefit from the excellent hemodynamic characteristics of a stentless valve. We consider stentless AVR the treatment of choice for patients older than 60 years and those having small aortic roots.

Impact of implant technique following freestyle stentless aortic valve replacement

BACKGROUND

Stentless aortic bioprostheses have excellent hemodynamics and clinical outcomes. The purpose of the present study was to determine whether implant technique of the Freestyle aortic root bioprosthesis impacts clinical outcomes or hemodynamic performance.

METHODS

The long-term multicenter study of the Freestyle stentless aortic bioprosthesis includes 500 consecutive patients implanted using the subcoronary and 162 using the full root technique. Clinical outcomes and echocardiographic hemodynamics were compared through 5 years.

RESULTS

There were no differences between groups in time to death, valve-related death, or reoperation. The incidence of operative death was higher in the full root than in the subcoronary group (odds ratio 3.97, p = 0.001). Patients in the subcoronary group were more likely to have New York Heart Association functional class III or IV symptoms at 1 year (1.7% versus 0%, p = 0.04) and 5 years postoperatively (4.4% versus 0%, p = 0.02). Mean gradient was lower (p = 0.0004) and effective orifice area larger (p = 0.04) in the full root group. Left ventricular mass index decreased in both groups. The preponderance of patients in both groups had no or trivial aortic regurgitation through 5 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Full root implantation of the Freestyle stentless aortic bioprosthesis was associated with higher operative mortality, but somewhat better hemodynamics, functional class, and freedom from aortic regurgitation. Higher operative mortality argues against the empiric replacement of the ascending aorta in the absence of aortic root pathology. In appropriately selected patients, both implant techniques are viable alternatives for valve implantation.

Intraoperative transesophageal echocardiographic assessment of the effect of protamine on paraprosthetic aortic insufficiency immediately after stentless tissue aortic valve replacement

Mild paravalvular aortic insufficiency (AI) is common immediately after stentless bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement. Although resolution of paraprosthetic jets with protamine has been described, the predictability of resolution has not been addressed. Intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography was performed before and after protamine administration among 2 groups. The first group (n = 20) was used to define the prevalence and severity of paravalvular AI after stentless tissue AVR, and define a threshold value for jet size associated with resolution with protamine. A second group (n = 18) was used to prospectively test the determined threshold. Paravalvular AI occurred in 13 of 20 (65%) patients. Using a threshold value of 0.3 cm or less jet width, prospective testing revealed positive and negative predictive values for AI resolution with protamine of 93% (14 of 15) and 100% (3 of 3), respectively. Protamine administration is associated with resolution of small AI jets immediately after implantation of a stentless aortic bioprosthesis, with a jet width 0.3 cm or less strongly predictive of resolution.

Comparison of valve resistance with effective orifice area regarding flow dependence

Aortic valve resistance has been proposed to represent the severity of aortic stenosis because some studies observed that it was less affected by change in flow than the valve-effective orifice area, but this issue remains controversial. The objective of this study was to systematically analyze the theoretical and practical determinants of these parameters in relation to changes in flow. Valve area and resistance in different valves were studied in vitro in a pulse duplicator system at different flow rates and in vivo in 90 subjects referred to either exercise or dobutamine infusion. Theoretical analysis and experimental results both demonstrated a unique relation between resistance (RES), valve-effective orifice area (EOA), and flow rate (Q): RES = K x (Q/EOA(2)). Accordingly, in fixed stenoses or in mechanical valves, resistance increased markedly with flow rate both in vitro (+0.88 +/- 0.26%/% of flow increase) and in vivo (mechanical valves: +2.09 +/- 4.61, fixed stenotic valves: +0.59 +/- 0.32%/%), whereas valve area did not change significantly (<0.2%/%). In contrast, in valves with a flexible orifice (bioprostheses and some patients with aortic stenosis), resistance was less increased due to the increase in valve area. Thus, both from a theoretical and a practical standpoint, valve resistance is much more flow dependent than valve area, particularly in fixed stenoses. Situations in which resistance does not increase with flow rate are unpredictable and are found in flexible valves when there is a concomitant increase in valve area.

Hemodynamic performance during maximum exercise in adult patients with the ross operation and comparison with normal controls and patients with aortic bioprostheses

This study examines the resting and exercise hemodynamic performance of the pulmonary autografts in the aortic position as well as of the homografts used for right ventricular outflow reconstruction in patients undergoing the Ross operation. Previous studies have reported excellent resting hemodynamics in patients who underwent aortic valve replacement with a pulmonary autograft. However, there are very few studies of their hemodynamic performance during exercise. Twenty adult subjects who underwent the Ross operation and 12 normal control subjects were submitted to maximum romp bicycle exercise. The valve effective orifice areas and transvalvular gradients of both aortic (autograft) and pulmonary (homograft) valves were measured at rest and at peak of maximum exercise using Doppler echocardiography. Valve areas were indexed for body surface area. The hemodynamics of the aortic valve were very similar in Ross subjects and in control subjects at rest and during exercise. However, the indexed valve area of the pulmonary valve at rest was significantly (p < 0.001) lower in the Ross subjects (1.10 +/- 0.46 cm2/ m2) than in the control subjects (1.95 +/- 0.41 cm2/m2), resulting in higher (p = 0.004) mean gradients at rest (Ross: 9 +/- 7 mm Hg vs control: 2 +/- 1 mm Hg) and at peak exercise (Ross: 21 +/- 14 mm Hg vs control: 7 +/- 2 mm Hg). The pulmonary autograft provided excellent hemodynamics in the aortic position either at rest or during maximum exercise, whereas moderately high gradients were found during exercise across the homograft implanted in the pulmonary valve position. Future improvement of the Ross procedure should be oriented toward the search of new methods to prevent the deterioration of the homografts.

Echocardiographic assessment of stentless aortic bioprosthetic valves

Stentless tissue aortic valves are gaining in popularity because of advantages in hemodynamics and durability compared with stented bioprostheses. The absence of a rigid sewing ring and struts makes these valves pliable, and distortion at implantation can result in valve dysfunction. Because the anatomy and implantation techniques of stentless tissue valves are unlike those of mechanical and stented tissue valves, their echocardiographic appearance is unique on both intraoperative and subsequent transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography. This report describes the echocardiographic appearance of normally functioning stentless tissue heterograft aortic valves as an aid to their intraoperative and subsequent echocardiographic assessment.

Hemodynamic and clinical impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch in the aortic valve position and its prevention

Prosthesis-patient mismatch is present when the effective orifice area of the inserted prosthetic valve is less than that of a normal human valve. This is a frequent problem in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement, and its main hemodynamic consequence is the generation of high transvalvular gradients through normally functioning prosthetic valves. The purposes of this report are to present an update on the concept of aortic prosthesis-patient mismatch and to review the present knowledge with regard to its impact on hemodynamic status, functional capacity, morbidity and mortality. Also, we propose a simple approach for the prevention and clinical management of this phenomenon because it can be largely avoided if certain simple factors are taken into consideration before the operation.

Changes in left ventricular mass and function after aortic valve replacement: a comparison between stentless and stented bioprosthetic valves

The objective of this study was to compare stentless bioprostheses with stented bioprostheses with regard to the postoperative changes in left ventricular (LV) mass and function. Forty patients with aortic stenosis undergoing valve replacement with a stentless (20 patients) or a stented (20 patients) bioprosthesis were evaluated early (baseline), 1 year, and 2 years after operation. Left ventricular mass index was calculated with the corrected American Society of Echocardiography formula. The relative changes between end-diastole and end-systole in LV mid-wall radius, length, and volume (ejection fraction) were determined with a previously validated model for dynamic geometry of the left ventricle. Overall, a significant decrease was found in LV mass index (from 155 +/- 30 to 112 +/- 23 g/m(2); P <.001) and a significant increase in longitudinal shortening (from 0.12 +/- 0.11 to 0.22 +/- 0.08; P <. 001), and ejection fractions (from 0.67 +/- 0.11 to 0.71 +/- 0.10; P =.017). No significant change was found in the mid-wall radius shortening fraction. Two years after surgery, the extent of LV mass regression was greater in stentless bioprostheses (-51 +/- 18 vs -35 +/- 17 g/m(2); P =.01), though the average mass index was similar in both groups (114 +/- 26 vs 110 +/- 20 g/m(2)). Also at 2 years, the longitudinal shortening fraction was greater in patients with a stentless bioprosthesis (0.25 +/- 0.07 vs 0.18 +/- 0.08; P =.03). In conclusion, this study suggests that the superior hemodynamic performance of stentless bioprostheses may have some benefits with regard to LV mass regression and function after aortic valve replacement. The significance of these benefits in terms of prognosis remains to be determined.