Usefulness of low-dose dobutamine stress echocardiography in predicting recovery of poor left ventricular function in atrial fibrillation dilated cardiomyopathy

The independent prognostic value of contractile and coronary flow reserve determined by dipyridamole stress echocardiography in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy

The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic value of Doppler echocardiographically derived coronary flow reserve (CFR) in assessing inotropic response in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (IDC). One hundred thirty-two patients with IDC (90 men; mean age 62 +/- 11 years) were evaluated by transthoracic dipyridamole (0.84 mg/kg in 10 minutes) stress echocardiography. All patients had ejection fractions <40% (mean 33 +/- 7%) and angiographically normal coronary arteries, with New York Heart Association class <or=III. CFR was assessed in the left anterior descending coronary artery by pulsed Doppler as the ratio of maximal peak vasodilation (dipyridamole) to rest diastolic flow velocity. Inotropic reserve was identified as rest-stress variation in wall motion score index >0.25. All patients were followed for a median of 24 months. Mean CFR was 2.0 +/- 0.5. On individual patient analysis, 48 patients had normal CFR (>2), and 84 had abnormal CFR. The mean wall motion score index at rest was 2.0 +/- 0.33 and decreased to 1.8 +/- 0.4 at peak dipyridamole dose (p <0.000). Forty-two patients (32%) had inotropic reserve. During follow-up, 19 patients died, and 34 showed worsening of New York Heart Association class. The worst outcomes were observed in those patients with abnormal CFR and no inotropic reserve with high-dose dipyridamole. In a Cox model, mitral insufficiency (hazard ratio [HR] 1.7, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1 to 2.8), New York Heart Association class (HR 2.0, 95% CI 1.1 to 3.7), abnormal CFR (HR 2.8, 95% CI 1.0 to 8.5), wall motion score index at rest (HR 3.5, 95% CI 1.3 to 9.8), and the absence of inotropic reserve with high-dose dipyridamole (HR 2.3, 95% CI 1.06 to 5.1) were independent predictors of survival. In conclusion, in patients with IDC, CFR is often impaired. Reduced CFR and the absence of an inotropic response during vasodilator stress are additive in predicting a worse prognosis.

Left Ventricular Dysfunction in Atrial Fibrillation: Restoration of Sinus Rhythm by the Cox-Maze Procedure Significantly Improves Systolic Function and Functional Status

BACKGROUND

Atrial flutter or fibrillation with rapid, uncontrolled ventricular response may lead to left ventricular dysfunction, and conversion to sinus rhythm with control of heart rate can improve left ventricular ejection fraction. Little is known about the effects of the Cox-maze procedure on this form of tachycardia-induced cardiomyopathy.

METHODS

Four hundred forty-three patients underwent the Cox-maze procedure from 1993 to 2002. Ninety-nine had atrial flutter or fibrillation without associated valvular or congenital heart disease, and 37 (37%) had decreased left ventricular function (ejection fraction < 0.35 in 11 [severe], ejection fraction 0.36 to 0.45 in 8 [moderate], and ejection fraction 0.46 to 0.55 in 18 [mild]). Ages of these 37 patients (34 male) ranged from 35 to 74 years (median, 55 years).

RESULTS

Atrial flutter or fibrillation was present for 3 months to 19 years (median, 48 months) preoperatively, and 24 patients (65%) exhibited symptoms of heart failure. Preoperative ejection fraction ranged from 0.25 to 0.55 (median, 0.45). At last follow-up (median, 63 months), the Cox-maze procedure eliminated atrial flutter or fibrillation in all but 1 patient, and the greatest improvement was observed in patients with severe preoperative impairment (0.31 to 0.53; p = 0.01, preoperative versus follow-up), and patients with preoperative chronic atrial flutter or fibrillation (0.43 to 0.55; p < 0.05 preoperative versus follow-up). This improvement was observed immediately postoperatively and was sustained at last follow-up. Further, improvement in left ventricular function correlated with enhancement of functional status.

CONCLUSIONS

In some patients, atrial flutter or fibrillation may be the cause rather than the consequence of left ventricular dysfunction. Importantly, systolic function and functional status can be significantly improved with the restoration of sinus rhythm by the Cox-maze procedure.

Stress-echocardiography in idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy: instructions for use

A number of studies have suggested that stress-echocardiography may be used for prognostic stratification in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. There is no consensus on which protocol or which measurements of left ventricular contractile reserve to use. The most frequently used protocol is low-dose dobutamine stress-echocardiography, and most commonly used measures of left ventricular systolic performance are ejection fraction, wall motion score index and cardiac power output.Stress-echocardiography has been shown to predict improvement in cardiac function in patients with recently diagnosed dilated cardiomyopathy, as well as to predict which patients will benefit from the treatment with beta-blockers. Most importantly, stress-echocardiography can identify patients with worse prognosis in terms of cardiac death and need for transplantation. Additionally, contractile reserve is closely correlated with maximal oxygen consumption and can even be used for further stratification in patients with maximal oxygen consumption between 10 and 14 ml/kg/min. Future studies are needed for head-to-head comparison of various protocols in an attempt to make standardization in the assessment of patients with dilated cardiomyopathy.

Rate control in atrial fibrillation: choice of treatment and assessment of efficacy

The clinical relevance and high social costs of atrial fibrillation have boosted interest in rate control as a cost-effective alternative to long-term maintenance of sinus rhythm (i.e. rhythm control). Prospective studies show that rate control (coupled with thromboembolic prophylaxis) is a valuable treatment option for all forms of atrial fibrillation. The rationale for rate control is that high ventricular rates, frequently found in atrial fibrillation, lead to haemodynamic impairment, consisting of a variable combination of loss of atrial kick, irregularity in ventricular response and inappropriately rapid ventricular rate, depending on the type of underlying heart disease. Long-term persistence of tachycardia at a high ventricular rate can lead to various degrees of ventricular dysfunction and even to tachycardiomyopathy-related heart failure. Identification of this reversible and often concealed form of left ventricular dysfunction can permit effective management by rate (or rhythm) control. Although acute rate control (to reduce ventricular rate within hours) is still often based on digoxin administration, for patients without left ventricular dysfunction, calcium channel antagonists or beta-adrenoceptor antagonists (beta-blockers) are generally more appropriate and effective. In chronic atrial fibrillation, long-term rate control (to reduce morbidity/mortality and improve quality of life) must be adapted to patients' individual characteristics to grant control during daily activities, including exercise. According to current guidelines, the clinical target of rate control should be a ventricular rate below 80-90 bpm at rest. However, in many patients, assessment of the appropriateness of different drugs should include exercise testing and 24h-Holter monitoring, for which specific guidelines are needed. In practice, rate control is considered a valid alternative to rhythm control. Recent prospective trials (e.g. the Pharmacological Intervention in Atrial Fibrillation [PIAF] and the Atrial Fibrillation Follow-up Investigation of Rhythm Management [AFFIRM] trials) have shown that in selected patients, rate control provides similar benefits, more economically, in terms of quality of life and long-term mortality. The choice of a rate control medication (digoxin, beta-blockers, calcium channel antagonists or possibly amiodarone) or a non-pharmacological approach (mainly atrioventricular node ablation coupled with pacing) must currently be based on clinical assessment, which includes assessing the presence of underlying heart disease and haemodynamic impairment. Definite guidelines are required for each different subset of patients. Rate control is particularly tricky in patients with heart failure, for whom non-pharmacological options can also be considered. The preferred pharmacological options are beta-blockers for stabilised heart failure and digoxin for unstabilised forms.

Predictores de reserva contráctil miocárdica en pacientes con miocardiopatía dilatada no isquémica. Estudio mediante ecocardiografía de estrés con dobutamina

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Myocardial contractile reserve studies with low-dose dobutamine echocardiography have been shown to be useful to assess functional myocardial status. However, the variables associated with contractile reserve after inotropic stimulation are not well known.

PATIENTS AND METHOD

We studied 50 patients (35 men, mean age 56.4 +/- 9.5 years) with nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy (NIDC), LVEF 28.7% +/- 8.5% and wall motion score index (WMSI) 2.42 +/- 0.34 with low-dose dobutamine echocardiography. Left ventricular contractile reserve was assessed by a differential parameter defined as the difference between rest and stress WMSI (DeltaWMSI).

RESULTS

After dobutamine infusion the WMSI was 1.95 +/- 0.58; from this value we calculated a DeltaWMSI of 0.45 +/- 0.39. None of the clinical variables showed a relationship with the presence of contractile reserve. In contrast, the following echocardiographic parameters correlated with DeltaWMSI: end-diastolic (p=0.05) and end-systolic (p=0.02) diameters, end-systolic volume index (p=0.01) and LVEF (p=0.002). In the multivariate analysis, only end-diastolic diameter was an independent predictor of contractile reserve (hazard ratio=0.852; 95% CI, 0.735-0.987; p=0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Ventricular diameters, end-systolic volume index and LVEF are related with improvements in myocardial contractility after dobutamine infusion, although only end-diastolic diameter was an independent predictor of contractile reserve. Thus, this parameter should receive particular attention in evaluations of the functional status of the myocardium in patients with NIDC.

Prognostic significance of the dobutamine echocardiography test in idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy

Dobutamine stress echo provides potentially useful information on idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (IDC). From February 1, 1997, to October 1, 1999, 186 patients (131 men and 55 women, mean age 56 +/- 12 years) with IDC, ejection fraction <35%, and angiographically normal coronary arteries were studied by high-dose (up to 40 micro/kg/min) dobutamine echo in 6 centers, all quality controlled for stress echo reading. In all patients, wall motion score index (WMSI) (from 1 = normal to 4 = dyskinetic in a 16- segment model of the left ventricle) was evaluated by echo at baseline and peak dobutamine. One hundred eighty-four patients were followed up (mean 15 +/- 13 months) and only cardiac death was considered as an end point. There were 29 cardiac deaths. Significant parameters for survival prediction at univariate analysis are: DeltaWMSI (chi-square 20.1; p <0.0000), New York Heart Association (NYHA) class (chi-square 17.57; p <0.0000), rest ejection fraction (chi-square 10.41; p = 0.0013), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (chi-square 8.23; p = 0.0041), and hypertension (chi-square 8.08, p = 0.0045). In the multivariate stepwise analysis only DeltaWMSI and NYHA were independent predictors of outcome (DeltaWMSI = hazard ratio 0.02, p < 0.0000; NYHA class = hazard ratio 3.83, p < 0.0000). Kaplan-Meier survival estimates showed a better outcome for patients with a large inotropic response (DeltaWMSI > or =0.44, a cutoff identified by receiver-operating characteristic curves analysis) than for those with a small or no myocardial inotropic response to dobutamine (93.6% vs 69.4%, p = 0.00033). Thus, in patients with IDC, an extensive contractile reserve identified by high-dose dobutamine stress echocardiography is associated with a better survival.

Abnormal contractile responses during dobutamine stress echocardiography in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy

BACKGROUND

In chronic heart failure augmented wall stress leads to increased energy demand. Supply, however, may be reduced due to coronary vasoconstriction and endothelial dysfunction. This might lead to a mismatch between demand and supply. In the present study we further explored the effect of increased demand during dobutamine stress echocardiography.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Sixteen patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (mean age 44+/-13 years, New York Heart Association class II-III, mean left ventricular ejection fraction 0.27+/-0.10) underwent dobutamine stress echocardiography (5-40 microg/min per kg bodyweight+atropine if required). Wall motion and thickening was assessed in 16 segments using a four-point scale. Eleven patients (69%) showed regions with worsening of wall motion or a biphasic response during dobutamine infusion. Of the remaining five patients one patient did not show any wall motion changes and one patient showed a partial improvement while only in three patients wall motion improvement in the whole heart was found.

CONCLUSION

A majority of patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy showed decreased wall motion during increased demand, i.e. ischemia-like myocardial contractile responses during dobutamine stress echocardiography. These findings further support the concept that an energy mismatch between demand and supply might play a pathophysiological role in idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy.

In patients with chronic atrial fibrillation and left ventricular systolic dysfunction, restoration of sinus rhythm confers substantial benefit

STUDY OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the benefit of sinus rhythm (SR) restoration in patients with chronic controlled atrial fibrillation (AF) and left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD).

DESIGN

Prospective case-control study on the short-term outcome (6 to 9 months) of clinical and echocardiographic variables following attempted cardioversion.

SETTING

Outpatient clinic of a university hospital.

PATIENTS

Fifteen men and 5 women, ranging in age from 40 to 76 years, who had chronic controlled (mean [+/- SD] ventricular rate, 82 +/- 10 beats/min) AF and left ventricular fractional shortening (LVFS) of < 28% at baseline. Control was provided by retrospective paired echocardiographic examinations of six AF patients, plus the study cases with potentially unsuccessful cardioversion or early recurrence of AF.

INTERVENTIONS

Attempt to restore SR with amiodarone or electrical countershock.

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

Conversion was attained in 17 patients, but AF recurred early in 4 patients, 3 of whom had proven ischemic LVSD. In the 13 patients with sustained SR, LVFS increased from 20 +/- 4% to 31 +/- 6% (p < 0.0001). In contrast, no changes were detected in the control group (n = 13). This improvement was paralleled by decreases in left ventricular (LV) end-diastolic dimension (from 55 +/- 7 to 51 +/- 6 mm; p = 0.014), LV mass (from 181 +/- 28 to 159 +/- 37 g; p = 0.015), and left atrial diameter (from 45 +/- 9 mm to 42 +/- 7; p = 0.003). A marked decrease in heart rate (from 82 +/- 9 to 64 +/- 5 beats/min; p < 0.0001) and a reduction in New York Heart Association functional class (from 2.3 +/- 0.9 to 1.2 +/- 0.4; p = 0.0007) also were observed in patients with sustained SR but not among subjects in the control group.

CONCLUSIONS

Even when adequate control of the ventricular rate has been achieved, the LV function of patients with chronic AF greatly improves after restoration and maintenance of SR.