Prolonged QT interval and altered QT/RR relation early after radiofrequency ablation of the atrioventricular junction

Outcomes of Atrioventricular Node Ablation and Pacing in Patients with Heart Failure and Atrial Fibrillation: From Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy to His Bundle Pacing

Objective: To review the relevant literature on the use of atrioventricular node ablation and pacing in patients with heart failure and atrial fibrillation. Methods: APubMed/MEDLINE and SCOPUS search was performed in order to assess the clinical outcomes of atrioventricular node ablation and pacemaker implantation, as well as the complications that may occur. Results: Several clinical trials, observational analyses and meta-analyses have shown that the "pace and ablate" strategy not only improves symptoms but also can enhance cardiac performance in patients with heart failure and atrial fibrillation. Although this procedure is effective and safe, some complications may occur including worsening of heart failure, permanent fibrillation, arrhythmias and sudden death. Regarding pacemaker implantation, cardiac resynchronization therapy is shown to be the optimal choice compared to right ventricle apical pacing. His bundle pacing is a promising alternative to cardiac resynchronization therapy and has shown beneficial effects, while left bundle branch pacing is an innovative modality. Conclusions: Atrioventricular node ablation and pacemaker implantation is shown to have beneficial effects on clinical outcomes of patients with atrial fibrillation ± heart failure who do not respond or are intolerant to medical treatment. Cardiac resynchronization therapy is the treatment of choice and His bundle pacing seems to be an effective alternative way of pacing in these patients.

QTc Dynamics Following Cardioversion for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation

Background

Cardioversion (CV) for atrial fibrillation (AF) is common. We aimed to assess changes in QTc over time following electrical CV (ECV) for persistent AF, and to compare the benefit of using continuous Holter monitoring vs. conventional follow-up by ECG.

Methods

Prospective observational cohort study. We comprised 90 patients admitted to our center for elective ECV due to persistent AF who were prospectively enrolled from July 2017 to August 2018. All patients underwent 7-days Holter started prior to ECV. Baseline QTc was defined as median QTc during 1 h post ECV. The primary endpoint was QTc prolongation defined as QTc ≥500 ms, or ≥10% increase (if baseline QTc was >480 ms). Conventional monitoring was defined as 2-h ECG post ECV.

Results

Mean age was 67 ± 11 years and 61% were male. Median baseline QTc was 452 ms (IQ range: 431–479 ms) as compared with a maximal median QTc of 474 ms (IQ range: 433–527 ms; p <0.001 for the change in QTc from baseline). Peak median QTc occurred 44 h post ECV. The primary endpoint was met in 3 patients (3%) using conventional monitoring, compared with 39 new patients (43%) using Holter (p <0.001 for comparison). The Holter monitoring was superior to conventional monitoring in detecting clinically significant QTc prolongation (OR = 13; p <0.001).

Conclusions

ECV of patients with persistent AF was associated with increased transient risk of QTc prolongation in nearly half of the patients. Peak median QTc occurs during end of second day following ECV and prolonged ECG monitoring provides superior detection of significant QTc prolongation compared with conventional monitoring.

Clinical results with catheter ablation: AV junction, atrial fibrillation and ventricular tachycardia

With the limitations of pharmacologic and device therapies for atrial fibrillation and ventricular tachycardia, catheter ablation is assuming a larger role in the management of patients with these common arrhythmias. Multiple case series and clinical trials have helped to define the evolving role of these techniques for ablation of the atrioventricular node, atrial fibrillation, and ischemic ventricular tachycardia. Based on very low complication rates, excellent efficacy and proven outcomes with radiofrequency ablation of the atrioventricular node, this approach with permanent pacing should play a larger role in the treatment of symptomatic patients with permanent atrial fibrillation. While linear ablation of atrial fibrillation has limited clinical utility for the treatment of this common arrhythmia, the results of multiple case series of focal atrial fibrillation ablation indicate the potential for an expanding role of this curative technique. Catheter ablation techniques for ventricular tachycardia in the setting of coronary artery disease have a role as supplemental therapy to the implantable cardioverter defibrillator in patients with recurrent pharmacologically refractory ventricular arrhythmias requiring frequent device interventions.

Transient proarrhythmic state following atrioventricular junction radiofrequency ablation: pathophysiologic mechanisms and recommendations for management

The induction of complete heart block by radiofrequency ablation of the atrioventricular junction combined with pacemaker implantation has become an established therapy for rate control in patients with atrial fibrillation who are unresponsive to drugs. Reports of ventricular arrhythmias and sudden death after ablation have, however, raised concerns about safety. Ventricular arrhythmias are usually polymorphic and related to a phase of electrical instability due to an initial prolongation and then slow adaptation of repolarization caused by the change in heart rate and activation sequence. Structural heart disease, and other factors that predispose for the acquired long QT syndrome, seem to add to the risk. Ventricular activation and repolarization stabilize during the first week after the procedure. Routine pacing at 80 beats per minute during this phase is recommended, as well as in hospital monitoring for at least 48 hours. Patients with high-risk features for arrhythmias, such as congestive heart failure or impaired left ventricular function, may require pacing at higher rates. Adjustment of the pacing rate-although rarely below 70 beats per minute-is usually undertaken after a week in most patients, preferably after an electrocardiographic evaluation for repolarization abnormalities at the lower rate.

Lethal ventricular arrhythmias following one-step pacemaker reprogramming for rapid tracking of atrial tachyarrhythmias

An abrupt decrease in the pacing rate in patients with dual-chamber pacemakers tracking atrial tachyarrhythmias carries a high risk of malignant ventricular arrhythmia. The pacing rate should be reduced by multistep programming over several days.