Effect of theophylline on the warm-up phenomenon

Repeated exercise stress testing identifies early and late preconditioning

BACKGROUND

The warm-up phenomenon has been considered to trigger preconditioning. We investigated whether repeated exercise treadmill tests in humans are capable of inducing adaptation to ischemia by triggering both the early and late phase of preconditioning.

METHODS

In 25 consecutive patients with stable coronary artery disease, four repeated treadmill tests were performed. Thirty minutes following the first test (T1) a second one was performed (T2), followed 6 h later by a third test (T3). Twenty-four hours later all patients were subjected to a fourth exercise test (T4). In every fifth patient, simultaneous echocardiographic examination was performed at the time of the exercise tests in an attempt to reveal ischemic abnormalities.

RESULTS

At baseline there was no difference between the variables. At ST segment depression >1.5 mm, the rate-pressure product (RPP) was higher in T2 and T4 (231.3+/-17.9 and 232.6+/-15.8 mm Hg s 10(2)) than in T1 and T3 (210+/-17 and 210.2+/-16.7 mm Hg s 10(2)), p<0.001. Additionally, time to the onset of chest pain was longer in T2 and T4 (430.8+/-60.5 and 438+/-47 s) than in T1 and T3 (345.6+/-69 and 345.6+/-58 s), p<0.001. At peak exercise, the RPP was higher in T2 and T4 (278.6+/-21.6 and 278.3+/-19.6 mm Hg s 10(2)) than in T1 and T3 (255.6+/-23.1 and 256.6+/-23 mm Hg s 10(2)), p<0.001. The wall motion score index was higher in T1 and T3 (1.65+/-0.17 and 1.53+/-0.16) than in T2 and T4 (1.3+/-0.07 and 1.37+/-0.1), p<0.001.

CONCLUSION

By using repeated exercise treadmill tests both the early and late phase of protection can be obtained.

Preconditioning the Myocardium: From Cellular Physiology to Clinical Cardiology

Yellon, Derek M., and James M. Downey. Preconditioning the Myocardium: From Cellular Physiology to Clinical Cardiology. Physiol Rev 83: 1113-1151, 2003; 10.1152/physrev.00009.2003.—The phenomenon of ischemic preconditioning, in which a period of sublethal ischemia can profoundly protect the cell from infarction during a subsequent ischemic insult, has been responsible for an enormous amount of research over the last 15 years. Ischemic preconditioning is associated with two forms of protection: a classical form lasting ∼2 h after the preconditioning ischemia followed a day later by a second window of protection lasting ∼3 days. Both types of preconditioning share similarities in that the preconditioning ischemia provokes the release of several autacoids that trigger protection by occupying cell surface receptors. Receptor occupancy activates complex signaling cascades which during the lethal ischemia converge on one or more end-effectors to mediate the protection. The end-effectors so far have eluded identification, although a number have been proposed. A range of different pharmacological agents that activate the signaling cascades at the various levels can mimic ischemic preconditioning leading to the hope that specific therapeutic agents can be designed to exploit the profound protection seen with ischemic preconditioning. This review examines, in detail, the complex mechanisms associated with both forms of preconditioning as well as discusses the possibility to exploit this phenomenon in the clinical setting. As our understanding of the mechanisms associated with preconditioning are unravelled, we believe we can look forward to the development of new therapeutic agents with novel mechanisms of action that can supplement current treatment options for patients threatened with acute myocardial infarction.

Does a selective adenosine A(1) receptor agonist protect against exercise induced ischaemia in patients with coronary artery disease?

BACKGROUND

The "warm up" effect in angina may represent ischaemic preconditioning, which is mediated by adenosine A(1) receptors in most models.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effect of a selective A(1) agonist, GR79236 (GlaxoSmithKline), on exercise induced angina and ischaemic left ventricular dysfunction in patients with coronary artery disease.

DESIGN

A double blind crossover study.

PATIENTS

25 patients with multivessel coronary artery disease.

INTERVENTIONS

On mornings one week apart, patients received intravenous GR79236 10 microgram/kg or placebo, and then carried out two supine bicycle exercise tests separated by 30 minutes. Equilibrium radionuclide angiography was done before and during exercise.

RESULTS

The onset of chest pain or 1 mm ST depression was delayed and occurred at a higher rate-pressure product during the second exercise test following either placebo or GR79236. Compared with placebo, GR79236 did not affect these indices during equivalent tests. GR79236 reduced resting global ejection fraction from (mean (SD)) 63 (7)% to 61 (5)% (p < 0.05) by a selective reduction in the regional ejection fraction of "ischaemic" left ventricular sectors (those where the ejection fraction fell during the first exercise test following placebo). Ischaemic sectors showed increased function during the second test following placebo (72 (21)% v 66 (20)%; p = 0.0001), or during the first test following GR79236 (69 (21)% v 66 (20)%; p = 0.0001). Sequential exercise further increased the function of ischaemic sectors even after drug administration.

CONCLUSIONS

GR79236 failed to mimic the warm up effect, and warm up occurred even in the presence of this agent. This suggests that ischaemic preconditioning is not an important component of this type of protection. The complex actions of the drug on regional left ventricular function at rest and during exercise suggest several competing A(1) mediated actions.

Myocardial perfusion imaging findings and the role of adenosine in the warm-up angina phenomenon

OBJECTIVES

This study examined the roles of myocardial perfusion and adenosine in warm-up angina.

BACKGROUND

In warm-up angina, neither the role of an adenosine-mediated mechanism, as is found in experimental ischemic preconditioning, nor of increased myocardial perfusion is well defined.

METHODS

In substudy A, a single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)-thallium-201 exercise test was performed by 12 subjects with ischemic heart disease on three occasions one week apart. The third test was preceded by a warm-up test. The extent of the thallium deficit and its intensity on the third test were compared with the baseline tests controlling for the heart rate-systolic blood pressure product (RPP) at thallium injection. In substudy B, 12 similar subjects did two successive exercise tests at two separate sessions and received the adenosine antagonist, aminophylline (intravenous 5 mg/kg bolus and 0.9 mg/kg/h infusion) at one session, and equivalent saline at the other session. Change in ischemic threshold (RPP at 1 mm ST segment depression) and in maximum ST depression adjusted for RPP were analyzed.

RESULTS

In substudy A, despite a significant attenuation of electrocardiogram indexes of myocardial ischemia between the baseline and third (warmed-up) tests, the thallium extent deficits (20.8 +/- 15.1% and 16.8 +/- 12.4%) and intensity deficits (41.2 +/- 12.6% and 39.3 +/- 12.6%) did not differ significantly. In substudy B, the increase in ischemic threshold on re-exercise was unaffected by aminophylline. Adjusted maximum ST depression even decreased to a greater extent on re-exercise with aminophylline (by 51 +/- 21%) than with saline (by 32 +/- 19%) (p = 0.012).

CONCLUSIONS

While warm-up angina is associated with a significant attenuation of exercise electrocardiogram indexes of ischemia, it is unaccompanied by significant changes in SPECT perfusion and does not appear to be mediated by an adenosine-dependent mechanism since it is not blocked by aminophylline. Thus, its mechanism, which appears distinct from experimental ischemic preconditioning, remains unidentified.

The preconditioning phenomenon: A tool for the scientist or a clinical reality?

The possibility that an innate mechanism of myocardial protection might be inducible in the human heart has generated considerable excitement and enthusiastic research. The potential to enhance myocardial resistance to ischemic injury in patients suffering the consequences of coronary artery disease has led to studies with more direct clinical relevance. However, in common with many other areas of clinical interest based on advances in basic scientific understanding, early enthusiasm may be disproportionate to ultimate therapeutic significance. There can be little doubt that our understanding of the mechanisms underlying the pathogenesis of ischemia-reperfusion injury has been enhanced significantly by the plethora of research stimulated by interest in endogenous myocardial protection. Direct extrapolation of observations in the laboratory to the cardiology clinic or operating theater is tempting but should be avoided. The results of recent clinical experiments that suggest that preconditioning can protect against ischemia, although encouraging, should be interpreted cautiously, with particular attention to the limitations of the end points available. A reasoned evaluation of recent research should prevent unrealistic expectations and allow improved design of future trials so that this potent adaptive phenomenon can be exploited to its maximum potential.