National use of the transesophageal echocardiographic-guided approach to cardioversion for patients in atrial fibrillation

Role of transesophageal echocardiography guided cardioversion in patients with atrial fibrillation, previous left atrial thrombus and effective anticoagulation

AIMS

The value of transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) to prevent cardioversion-related thromboembolic events in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and left atrial (LA) thrombus is unclear. We compared the embolic risk associated with a strategy of follow-up TEE-guided direct-current cardioversion (DCCV) with that of blind DCCV in patients with AF, pre-existing LA thrombus and effective anticoagulation.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We identified 67 subjects with TEE-documented LA appendage thrombi from a total of 520 consecutive patients with symptomatic non-rheumatic AF who were referred to us for elective DCCV. All patients received at least 4 weeks of effective warfarin therapy (target international normalized ratio, 2 to 3) before and after DCCV. At time of DCCV, 20 patients had TEE and 47 did not. There were no clinical and echocardiographic differences between the two groups. Thrombus resolution was documented in 18 (90%) patients. After a median follow-up of 4 weeks, two transient ischemic attacks were observed in patients who were blindly cardioverted and one in patients belonging to the TEE group. Sinus rhythm was documented at the time of each thromboembolic event. By multiple logistic regression analysis the TEE strategy was not associated with lower risk of thromboembolism as compared to blind DCCV (odds ratio 1.37; 95% confidence interval, 0.16% to 15.86%; p=0.20).

CONCLUSION

In patients with AF, LA thrombus and effective anticoagulation, there is no difference in the risk of clinical thromboembolism between DCCV with or without follow-up TEE. Benefits of warfarin are related to thrombus resolution and prevention of new thrombus formation.

Anticoagulation during cardioversion in patients with atrial fibrillation: current clinical practice

The role of anticoagulation in the long-term treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF) has been well established in prospective randomized trials. Less certainty exists on the optimal anticoagulation in the setting of AF cardioversion. Current guidelines advocate anticoagulation for 3-4 weeks before and after cardioversion of AF of >48 hours' duration. Alternatively, early cardioversion may be performed after exclusion of left atrial thrombi by transesophageal echocardiography. However, with conventional anticoagulation, the risk of bleeding has to be considered and, thus, anticoagulation is frequently underused in the clinical setting. Moreover, the role of cardioversion has been questioned by recent trials suggesting no benefit of sinus rhythm restoration over rate control in AF. This article aims to summarize the currently available data on anticoagulation in cardioversion of AF in the context of these new studies and points to some new drugs such as low-molecular weight heparins and oral thrombin inhibitors that may lead to safer anticoagulation for prevention of thromboembolic complications of AF in the future.

Course of intraatrial thrombi resolution using transesophageal echocardiography

Thromboembolic events are associated with atrial fibrillation and with cardioversion to sinus rhythm. Although studies have demonstrated the risk of this complication is reduced by a 3-week period of anticoagulation prior to cardioversion, limited data have suggested a longer period of anticoagulation is necessary for thrombus resolution. We identified and followed 25 patients noted to have intraatrial thrombi on an initial transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE) who subsequently had a follow-up TEE. The majority of patients had a single thrombus, often but not uniformly located in the left atrial appendage with the largest found in those patients with mitral stenosis. Repeat TEE was performed at a mean of 4 +/- 6 months and persistent thrombus was noted in 19 of 25 patients (76%). Seven of 19 patients with persistent thrombi were cardioverted and one of these patients had a neurologic event following the procedure (14%). The only findings associated with persistent thrombus were the presence of mitral valve disease and atrial fibrillation. Our findings suggest that intraatrial thrombi do not generally resolve following several weeks of anticoagulation and that persistent left-sided intraatrial thrombi may be associated with an increased risk for events following cardioversion. Given that a TEE-guided approach to cardioversion is being utilized more frequently, it may be important to determine thrombus characteristics on follow-up that would be predictive of embolic events following cardioversion.

Duration of warfarin sodium therapy prior to electrical cardioversion of atrial fibrillation

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the duration of anticoagulation treatment with warfarin sodium before elective DC-cardioversion and to identify clinical variables predicting short-term versus long-term waiting times.

DESIGN

Retrospective.

SUBJECTS

Patients with a known start date for warfarin sodium, a known duration of atrial fibrillation (AF) and who underwent DC-cardioversion were included.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Duration of treatment with warfarin sodium prior to DC-cardioversion.

METHODS

The hospital records of 288 consecutive patients with AF scheduled for elective cardioversion at two hospitals in Stockholm were reviewed. Only patients with a known start date for warfarin sodium and known duration of AF were included in the study.

RESULTS

The median age was 70 (26-85) years and the duration of AF at time of cardioversion were 18 weeks (5-273) weeks. The median treatment duration prior to cardioversion with warfarin sodium was 12 weeks. Sinus rhythm was established in 224 (78%) patients of which 90 (40%) remained in sinus rhythm 1 month after cardioversion. In multivariate analysis, the only independent predictor of short waiting times for cardioversion (8 vs. 15 weeks) was if a cardiologist instituted the treatment with warfarin sodium (P < 0.001, 95% CI 5.0-9.0).

CONCLUSION

The average waiting time from start of warfarin sodium treatment to elective cardioversion exceeds by far the recommended 3-4 weeks on therapeutic international normalized ratio (INR). In order to minimize the time period until cardioversion significant changes in the out-of-hospital care logistics has to be undertaken.

Cardiac arrest associated with intravenous propofol during transesophageal echocardiography before DC cardioversion

Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE)-guided cardioversion has been utilized as a feasible alternative to conventional anticoagulation strategies in the management of patients with atrial fibrillation. As such, the use of intravenous sedation protocols using relatively short-acting anesthetics, such as propofol, have gained popularity in the outpatient and inpatient settings for such procedures. The authors report a case of cardiac arrest and electromechanical dissociation associated with the use of intravenous propofol during TEE before direct current cardioversion for atrial fibrillation.

Critical appraisal of transesophageal echocardiography in cardioversion of atrial fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation is the most common sustained cardiac arrhythmia and an important health concern in the United States because of the increasing aging population. Cardioversion of atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm to relieve symptoms and to reduce the incidence of thromboembolism is now common practice. Recently, transesophageal echocardiography (TEE)-facilitated cardioversion emerged as an acceptable therapeutic alternative owing to the assumption that early cardioversion can obviate many of the concerns and disadvantages associated with the conventional approach. We review the current standing of TEE-facilitated early cardioversion vis-à-vis the salient cardioversion issues and its potential future role amid evolving cardioversion paradigms.

Potential clinical efficacy and cost benefit of a transesophageal echocardiography-guided low-molecular-weight heparin (enoxaparin) approach to antithrombotic therapy in patients undergoing immediate cardioversion from atrial fibrillation

An alternative clinical management strategy and cost analysis model is presented for patients with atrial fibrillation of >2 days' duration who may benefit from immediate cardioversion with self-administered low-molecular-weight heparin (enoxaparin) as a bridge antithrombotic therapy to warfarin, after a negative transesophageal echo-cardiography (TEE) screening for thrombus. Assuming no difference in stroke or bleeding rates, our cost minimization model shows that the TEE-guided enoxaparin treatment costs are $1353 lower per patient than an intravenous unfractionated heparin approach. Sensitivity analyses for stroke and bleeding reveal that the treatment-cost economic dominance of the TEE-guided enoxaparin approach may be enhanced by an expected improvement in clinical outcome.

Role of transesophageal echocardiography-guided cardioversion of patients with atrial fibrillation

Electrical cardioversion of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) is frequently performed to relieve symptoms and improve cardiac performance. Patients undergoing cardioversion are treated conventionally with therapeutic anticoagulation for three weeks before and four weeks after cardioversion to decrease the risk of thromboembolism. A transesophageal echocardiography (TEE)-guided strategy has been proposed as an alternative that may lower stroke and bleeding events. Patients without atrial cavity thrombus or atrial appendage thrombus by TEE are cardioverted on achievement of therapeutic anticoagulation, whereas cardioversion is delayed in higher risk patients with thrombus. The aim of this review is to discuss the issues and controversies associated with the management of patients with AF undergoing cardioversion. We provide an overview of the TEE-guided and conventional anticoagulation strategies in light of the recently completed Assessment of Cardioversion Using Transesophageal Echocardiography (ACUTE) clinical trial. The two management strategies comparably lower the patient's embolic risk when the guidelines are properly followed. The TEE-guided strategy with shorter term anticoagulation may lower the incidence of bleeding complications and safely expedite early cardioversion. The inherent advantages and disadvantages of both strategies are presented. The TEE-guided approach with short-term anticoagulation is considered to be a safe and clinically effective alternative to the conventional approach, and it is advocated in patients in whom earlier cardioversion would be clinically beneficial.

Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) in atrial fibrillation

Transesophageal echocardiography has given new insight into the pathogenesis of the thromboembolic sequelae of AF and expanded the available therapeutic options. Studies to date indicate that TEE-guided cardioversion is a safe and reasonable approach when the clinical situation warrants prompt restoration of sinus rhythm. Whether widespread use of this strategy offers further benefit remains to be established, although there are theoretical advantages to such an approach. The potential for earlier cardioversion using a TEE-guided approach may facilitate the achievement and maintenance of sinus rhythm. In the long term, earlier restoration of sinus rhythm prevents adverse atrial remodeling, lowers embolic risk, and may improve cardiac performance and functional status. Thromboembolic sequelae (either cardioversion-related or as a result of chronic AF) remain the most devastating complications of AF. Every attempt to minimize this risk should be pursued aggressively. Information gathered from TEE has helped to elucidate the mechanisms responsible for postcardioversion embolism and has emphasized the importance of anticoagulation during and after the restoration of sinus rhythm. TEE also has the potential to further risk stratify patients with AF. Ultimately, a subset of patients may be identified who require more intense anticoagulation (i.e., those with dense SEC or thrombus, or persistent thrombus after prolonged anticoagulation) or in whom cardioversion may be deferred entirely. Likewise, TEE also may prove to be useful in identifying patients with a low-clinical risk profile who may be treated with aspirin alone and patients in whom warfarin may be superior. The results of the ACUTE study should help to further define the role of TEE in the management of patients with AF. Additional clinical studies are needed to address some of the issues that have been raised and to allow for optimal use of TEE in this patient population.

Cost-effective management of acute atrial fibrillation: role of rate control, spontaneous conversion, medical and direct current cardioversion, transesophageal echocardiography, and antiembolic therapy

Management strategies for the acute treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF) include: (1) the use of intravenous drugs for rate control, (2) drug termination, or (3) direct current (DC) cardioversion. Delays in cardioversion can promote atrial remodeling and add thromboembolic risk. Rate control awaiting spontaneous or pharmacologic conversion may be a cost-effective strategy in patients presenting with recent onset of symptoms. Early DC cardioversion can be cost-effective and minimize antiembolic therapy issues in the acute setting. In patients presenting with AF of unknown or >48 hours' duration, rate control and therapeutic warfarin for 3-4 weeks followed by medical or DC cardioversion is standard practice. However, delays in conversion promote atrial remodeling that makes restoration of sinus rhythm more difficult and increases the likelihood of postcardioversion AF recurrence. Transesophageal echocardiography can identify patients at low risk for a cardioversion-related embolic event and allows cardioversion to be performed earlier, thereby minimizing atrial remodeling.