1
|
Nasir M, Dejene K, Bedru M, Ahmed M, Markos S. Predictors of complications and mortality among patients undergoing pacemaker implantation in resource-limited settings: a 10-year retrospective follow-up study. BMC Cardiovasc Disord 2024; 24:400. [PMID: 39090565 PMCID: PMC11293136 DOI: 10.1186/s12872-024-04068-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2024] [Accepted: 07/22/2024] [Indexed: 08/04/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Pacemakers (PMs) are used to treat patients with severe bradycardia symptoms. They do, however, pose several complications. Even with these risks, there are only a few studies assessing PM implantation outcomes in resource-limited settings like Ethiopia and other sub-Saharan countries in general. Therefore, this study aims to assess the mid-term outcome of PM implantation in patients who have undergone PM implantation in the Cardiac Center of Ethiopia by identifying the rate and predictors of complications and death. METHODOLOGY This retrospective study was conducted at the Cardiac Center of Ethiopia from October 2023 to January 2024 on patients who had PM implantation from September 2012 to August 2023 to assess the midterm outcome of the patients. Complication rate and all-cause mortality rate were the outcomes of our study. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with complications and death. To analyze survival times, a Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed. RESULTS This retrospective follow-up study included 182 patients who underwent PM implantation between September 2012 and August 2023 and were at least 18 years old. The patients' median follow-up duration was 72 months (Interquartile range (IQR): 36-96 months). At the end of the study, 26.4% of patients experienced complications. The three most frequent complications were lead dislodgement, which affected 6.6% of patients, PM-induced tachycardia, which affected 5.5% of patients, and early battery depletion, which affected 5.5% of patients. Older age (Adjusted Odds Ratio (AOR) 1.1, 95% CI 1.04-1.1, p value < 0.001), being female (AOR 4.5, 95%CI 2-9.9, p value < 0.001), having dual chamber PM (AOR 2.95, 95%CI 1.14-7.6, p value = 0.006) were predictors of complications. Thirty-one (17%) patients died during the follow-up period. The survival rates of our patients at 3, 5, and 10 years were 94.4%, 92.1%, and 65.5% respectively with a median survival time of 11 years. Patients with a higher Charlson comorbidity index before PM implantation (AOR 1.2, 95% CI 1.1-1.8, p = 0.04), presence of complications (AOR 3.5, 95% CI 1.2-10.6, p < 0.03), and New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III or IV (AOR 3.3, 95% CI 1.05-10.1, p = 0.04) were associated with mortality. CONCLUSION Many complications were experienced by patients who had PMs implanted, and several factors affected their prognosis. Thus, it is essential to identify predictors of both complications and mortality to prioritize and address the manageable factors associated with both mortality and complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohammed Nasir
- Pediatrics and Child Health Department, Hawassa University, Hawassa, Ethiopia.
| | | | | | - Muluken Ahmed
- Pediatrics and Child Health Department, Arba Minch University, Arba Minch, Ethiopia
| | - Sura Markos
- Internal Medicine Department, Division of Cardiology, Hawassa University, Hawassa, Ethiopia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Chabrak S, Haggui A, Allouche E, Ouali S, Ben Halima A, Kacem S, Krichen S, Marrakchi S, Fehri W, Mourali MS, Jabbari Z, Ben Halima M, Neffati E, Heraiech A, Slim M, Kachboura S, Gamra H, Hassine M, Kraiem S, Kammoun S, Bezdah L, Jridi G, Bouraoui H, Kammoun S, Hammami R, Chettaoui R, Ben Ameur Y, Azaiez F, Tlili R, Battikh K, Ben Slima H, Chrigui R, Fazaa S, Sanaa I, Ellouz Y, Mosrati M, Milouchi S, Jarmouni S, Ayadi W, Akrout M, Razgallah R, Neffati W, Drissa M, Charfeddine S, Abdessalem S, Abid L, Zakhama L. National Tunisian Study of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices: Design and Protocol for a Nationwide Multicenter Prospective Observational Study. JMIR Res Protoc 2024; 13:e47525. [PMID: 38588529 PMCID: PMC11036188 DOI: 10.2196/47525] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2023] [Revised: 10/29/2023] [Accepted: 10/31/2023] [Indexed: 04/10/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In Tunisia, the number of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) is increasing, owing to the increase in patient life expectancy and expanding indications. Despite their life-saving potential and a significant reduction in population morbidity and mortality, their increased numbers have been associated with the development of multiple early and late complications related to vascular access, pockets, leads, or patient characteristics. OBJECTIVE The study aims to identify the rate, type, and predictors of complications occurring within the first year after CIED implantation. It also aims to describe the demographic and epidemiological characteristics of a nationwide sample of patients with CIED in Tunisia. Additionally, the study will evaluate the extent to which Tunisian electrophysiologists follow international guidelines for cardiac pacing and sudden cardiac death prevention. METHODS The Tunisian National Study of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices (NATURE-CIED) is a national, multicenter, prospectively monitored study that includes consecutive patients who underwent primary CIED implantation, generator replacement, and upgrade procedure. Patients were enrolled between January 18, 2021, and February 18, 2022, at all Tunisian public and private CIED implantation centers that agreed to participate in the study. All enrolled patients entered a 1-year follow-up period, with 4 consecutive visits at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after CIED implantation. The collected data are recorded electronically on the clinical suite platform (DACIMA Clinical Suite). RESULTS The study started on January 18, 2021, and concluded on February 18, 2023. In total, 27 cardiologists actively participated in data collection. Over this period, 1500 patients were enrolled in the study consecutively. The mean age of the patients was 70.1 (SD 15.2) years, with a sex ratio of 1:15. Nine hundred (60%) patients were from the public sector, while 600 (40%) patients were from the private sector. A total of 1298 (86.3%) patients received a conventional pacemaker and 75 (5%) patients received a biventricular pacemaker (CRT-P). Implantable cardioverter defibrillators were implanted in 127 (8.5%) patients. Of these patients, 45 (3%) underwent CRT-D implantation. CONCLUSIONS This study will establish the most extensive contemporary longitudinal cohort of patients undergoing CIED implantation in Tunisia, presenting a significant opportunity for real-world clinical epidemiology. It will address a crucial gap in the management of patients during the perioperative phase and follow-up, enabling the identification of individuals at particularly high risk of complications for optimal care. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05361759; https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05361759. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID) RR1-10.2196/47525.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sonia Chabrak
- Pasteur Clinic, General and Cardiovascular Clinic of Tunis, Tunis, Tunisia
| | - Abdeddayem Haggui
- Military Hospital, Faculty of Medicine of Tunis, University of Tunis, Tunis, Tunisia
| | - Emna Allouche
- Cardiology Department, Faculty of Medicine of Tunis, Charles Nicole Hospital, University of Tunis, Tunis, Tunisia
| | - Sana Ouali
- Cardiology Department, Faculty of Medicine of Tunis, La Rabta Hospital, University of Tunis, Tunis, Tunisia
| | - Afef Ben Halima
- Abderrahmen Mami Hospital, Faculty of Medicine of Tunis, University of Tunis, Tunis, Tunisia
| | | | | | - Sonia Marrakchi
- Cardiology Department, Versailles Cardiology Center, Paris, France
| | - Wafa Fehri
- Cardiology Department, Faculty of Medicine of Tunis, Military Hospital, University of Tunis, Tunis, Tunisia
| | - Mohamed Sami Mourali
- Cardiology Department, Faculty of Medicine of Tunis, La Rabta Hospital, University of Tunis, Tunis, Tunisia
| | - Zeineb Jabbari
- Cardiology Department, Faculty of Medicine of Tunis, La Rabta Hospital, University of Tunis, Tunis, Tunisia
| | - Manel Ben Halima
- Cardiology Department, Faculty of Medicine of Tunis, Abderrahmen Mami Hospital, University of Tunis, Tunis, Tunisia
| | - Elyes Neffati
- Cardiology Department, Faculty of Medicine of Sousse, Sahloul Hospital, University of Sousse, Sousse, Tunisia
| | - Aymen Heraiech
- Cardiology Department, Faculty of Medicine of Sousse, Sahloul Hospital, University of Sousse, Sousse, Tunisia
| | - Mehdi Slim
- Cardiology Department, Faculty of Medicine of Sousse, Sahloul Hospital, University of Sousse, Sousse, Tunisia
| | - Salem Kachboura
- Cardiology Department, Faculty of Medicine of Tunis, Abderrahmen Mami Hospital, University of Tunis, Tunis, Tunisia
| | - Habib Gamra
- Cardiology A Department, Fattouma Bourguiba Hospital, Monastir, Tunisia
| | - Majed Hassine
- Cardiology A Department, Fattouma Bourguiba Hospital, Monastir, Tunisia
| | - Sondes Kraiem
- Cardiology Department, Faculty of Medicine of Tunis, Habib Thameur Hospital, University of Tunis, Tunis, Tunisia
| | - Sofien Kammoun
- Cardiology Department, Faculty of Medicine of Tunis, Habib Thameur Hospital, University of Tunis, Tunis, Tunisia
| | - Leila Bezdah
- Cardiology Department, Faculty of Medicine of Tunis, Charles Nicole Hospital, University of Tunis, Tunis, Tunisia
| | - Gouider Jridi
- Cardiology Department, Faculty of Medicine of Sousse, Farhat Hached Hospital, University of Sousse, Sousse, Tunisia
| | - Hatem Bouraoui
- Cardiology Department, Faculty of Medicine of Sousse, Farhat Hached Hospital, University of Sousse, Sousse, Tunisia
| | - Samir Kammoun
- Cardiology Department, Faculty of Medicine of Sfax, Hedi Chaker Hospital, University of Sfax, Sfax, Tunisia
| | - Rania Hammami
- Cardiology Department, Faculty of Medicine of Sfax, Hedi Chaker Hospital, University of Sfax, Sfax, Tunisia
- Tunisian Society of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery, Tunis, Tunisia
| | - Rafik Chettaoui
- Pasteur Clinic, General and Cardiovascular Clinic of Tunis, Tunis, Tunisia
| | - Youssef Ben Ameur
- Cardiology Department, Faculty of Medicine of Tunis, Mongi Slim Hospital, University of Tunis, Tunis, Tunisia
| | - Fares Azaiez
- Cardiology Department, Faculty of Medicine of Tunis, Mongi Slim Hospital, University of Tunis, Tunis, Tunisia
| | - Rami Tlili
- Cardiology Department, Faculty of Medicine of Tunis, Mongi Slim Hospital, University of Tunis, Tunis, Tunisia
| | | | - Hedi Ben Slima
- Cardiology Department, Faculty of Medicine of Tunis, Menzel Bourguiba Hospital, University of Tunis, Bizerte, Tunisia
| | - Rim Chrigui
- Pasteur Clinic, General and Cardiovascular Clinic of Tunis, Tunis, Tunisia
| | - Samia Fazaa
- Pasteur Clinic, General and Cardiovascular Clinic of Tunis, Tunis, Tunisia
| | - Islem Sanaa
- General & Cardiovascular Clinic, Tunis, Tunisia
| | - Yassine Ellouz
- Pasteur Clinic, General and Cardiovascular Clinic of Tunis, Tunis, Tunisia
| | | | - Sami Milouchi
- Tunisian Society of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery, Tunis, Tunisia
- Cardiology Department, Habib Bourguiba Hospital, University of Sfax, Medenine, Tunisia
| | - Soumaya Jarmouni
- Pasteur Clinic, General and Cardiovascular Clinic of Tunis, Tunis, Tunisia
| | | | | | | | | | - Meriem Drissa
- Tunisian Society of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery, Tunis, Tunisia
- Cardiology Department, Faculty of Medicine of Tunis, Mongi Slim Hospital, University of Tunis, Tunis, Tunisia
| | - Selma Charfeddine
- Cardiology Department, Faculty of Medicine of Sfax, Hedi Chaker Hospital, University of Sfax, Sfax, Tunisia
- Tunisian Society of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery, Tunis, Tunisia
| | - Salem Abdessalem
- Tunisian Society of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery, Tunis, Tunisia
| | - Leila Abid
- Cardiology Department, Faculty of Medicine of Sfax, Hedi Chaker Hospital, University of Sfax, Sfax, Tunisia
| | - Lilia Zakhama
- Cardiology Department, Hospital of the Interior Force Security, University of Tunis, Tunis, Tunisia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Jiménez-Candil J, Oterino A, Cruz Galbán A, Hernández J, Moriñigo JL, Sánchez García M, Sánchez PL. Outcomes of a 24/7 service for urgent permanent pacemaker implantation. REVISTA ESPANOLA DE CARDIOLOGIA (ENGLISH ED.) 2024:S1885-5857(24)00102-6. [PMID: 38521441 DOI: 10.1016/j.rec.2024.03.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2023] [Accepted: 03/11/2024] [Indexed: 03/25/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES Most of the complications associated with acute and symptomatic bradyarrhythmia (ASB) occur in the time from diagnosis to permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI). We aimed to evaluate the outcomes of an urgent 24/7 PPI service (PPI-24/7) for patients with ASB. METHODS A total of 664 patients undergoing first-time PPI for ASB were prospectively assessed during 2 periods of identical length (18 months): 341 patients who underwent the procedure during working hours only (PPI-WH), and 323 patients who underwent the procedure after the implementation of the PPI-24/7 service. The primary safety endpoint was established as the cumulative 180-day incidence of complications related to the index arrhythmia and device implant. The primary efficacy endpoint was determined as the average number of hospital stays per patient. RESULTS The PPI-24/7 period was associated with a significant shortening of the time from diagnosis to implantation (median [interquartile range]): 3hours [2-6] vs 16 [5-21]). The cumulative incidence of patients with complications at 180 days was lower in the PPI-24/7 period: 9% vs 17% (adjusted odds ratio, 0.5; P=.002), due to a significant reduction in preimplant complications: 2.5% vs 12% (P <.001). The average number of hospital stays was reduced by 2 per patient in the PPI-24/7 period (nonparametric P <.001). PPI-24/7 implants performed outside working hours (n=178) were safe, with a 180-day cumulative incidence in procedure-related complications of 3.9%. CONCLUSIONS Among patients with ASB, PPI-24/7 was associated with a significant reduction in patient morbidity and efficient hospital resource use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Javier Jiménez-Candil
- Servicio de Cardiología, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Salamanca (IBSAL), Hospital Universitario de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Cardiovasculares (CIBERCV), Spain; Departamento de Medicina, Universidad de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.
| | - Armando Oterino
- Servicio de Cardiología, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Salamanca (IBSAL), Hospital Universitario de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain
| | - Alba Cruz Galbán
- Servicio de Cardiología, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Salamanca (IBSAL), Hospital Universitario de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain
| | - Jesús Hernández
- Servicio de Cardiología, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Salamanca (IBSAL), Hospital Universitario de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain
| | - José Luis Moriñigo
- Servicio de Cardiología, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Salamanca (IBSAL), Hospital Universitario de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain; Departamento de Medicina, Universidad de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain
| | - Manuel Sánchez García
- Servicio de Cardiología, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Salamanca (IBSAL), Hospital Universitario de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain
| | - Pedro L Sánchez
- Servicio de Cardiología, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Salamanca (IBSAL), Hospital Universitario de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Cardiovasculares (CIBERCV), Spain; Departamento de Medicina, Universidad de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Nair DG, Exner DV, Reddy VY, Badie N, Ligon D, Miller MA, Lee B, Doty B, Thomaides A, Eldadah Z, Islam M, Hadadi C. Early real-world implant experience with a helix-fixation ventricular leadless pacemaker. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 2024:10.1007/s10840-024-01791-1. [PMID: 38509402 DOI: 10.1007/s10840-024-01791-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2024] [Accepted: 03/13/2024] [Indexed: 03/22/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Roughly one in six patients receiving conventional transvenous pacemaker systems experience significant complications within 1 year of implant, mainly due to the transvenous lead and subcutaneous pocket. A new helix-fixation single-chamber ventricular leadless pacemaker (LP) system capable of pre-deployment exploratory electrical mapping is commercially available. Such an LP may mitigate complications while streamlining the implantation. In this study, the initial real-world implant experience of the helix-fixation LP was evaluated following its commercial release. METHODS In patients indicated for single-chamber right ventricular pacing, helix-fixation Aveir VR LPs (Abbott, Abbott Park, IL) were implanted using the dedicated loading tool, introducer, and delivery catheter. Implant procedural characteristics, electrical parameters, and any 30-day procedure-related adverse events of consecutive implant attempts were retrospectively evaluated. RESULTS A total of 167 patients with Class I indication for permanent pacing received implants in four North American centers (57% male, 70 years old). Pre-fixation electrical mapping of potential sites allowed repositioning to be avoided in 95.7% of patients. Median [interquartile range] LP procedure and fluoroscopy durations were 25.5 min [20.0, 35.0] and 5.7 min [4.0, 9.2], respectively. Pacing capture threshold, sensed R-wave amplitude, and impedance were 0.8 V [0.5, 1.3], 9.0 mV [6.0, 12.0], and 705 Ω [550, 910], respectively. Implantation was successful in 98.8% of patients, with 98.2% free from acute adverse events. CONCLUSIONS The initial, real-world experience of the helix-fixation ventricular leadless pacemaker demonstrated safe and efficient implantation with minimal repositioning, viable electrical metrics, and limited acute complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Devi G Nair
- Bernards Healthcare, Jonesboro, AR, USA.
- Arrhythmia Research Group, Jonesboro, AR, USA.
| | | | - Vivek Y Reddy
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | | | | | - Marc A Miller
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | | | | | - Athanasios Thomaides
- MedStar Heart and Vascular Institute, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Zayd Eldadah
- MedStar Heart and Vascular Institute, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Malick Islam
- MedStar Heart and Vascular Institute, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Cyrus Hadadi
- MedStar Heart and Vascular Institute, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kowlgi GN, Vaidya V, Dai MY, Futela P, Mishra R, Hodge DO, Deshmukh AJ, Mulpuru SK, Friedman PA, Cha YM. Trends in the 30-year span of noninfectious cardiovascular implantable electronic device complications in Olmsted County. Heart Rhythm O2 2024; 5:158-167. [PMID: 38560372 PMCID: PMC10980926 DOI: 10.1016/j.hroo.2024.02.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/04/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs), such as permanent pacemakers, implantable cardioverter-defibrillators, and cardiac resynchronization therapy devices, alleviate morbidity and mortality in various diseases. There is a paucity of real-world data on CIED complications and trends. Objectives We sought to describe trends in noninfectious CIED complications over the past 3 decades in Olmsted County. Methods The Rochester Epidemiology Project is a medical records linkage system comprising records of over 500,000 residents of Olmsted County from 1966 to present. CIED implantations between 1988 and 2018 were determined. Trends in noninfectious complications within 30 days of implantation were analyzed. Results A total of 157 (6.2%) of 2536 patients who received CIED experienced device complications. A total of 2.7% of the implants had major complications requiring intervention. Lead dislodgement was the most common (2.8%), followed by hematoma (1.7%). Complications went up from 1988 to 2005, and then showed a downtrend until 2018, driven by a decline in hematomas in the last decade (P < .01). Those with complications were more likely to have prosthetic valves. Obesity appeared to have a protective effect in a multivariate regression model. The mean Charlson comorbidity index has trended up over the 30 years. Conclusion Our study describes a real-world trend of CIED complications over 3 decades. Lead dislodgements and hematomas were the most common complications. Complications have declined over the last decade due to safer practices and a better understanding of anticoagulant management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Vaibhav Vaidya
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Ming-Yan Dai
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Pragyat Futela
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Rahul Mishra
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - David O. Hodge
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida
| | | | - Siva K. Mulpuru
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Paul A. Friedman
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Yong-Mei Cha
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Markos S, Nasir M, Ahmed M, Abebe S, Amogne MA, Tesfaye D, Mekonnen TS, Getachew YG. Assessment of Trend, Indication, Complications, and Outcomes of Pacemaker Implantation in Adult Patients at Tertiary Hospital of Ethiopia: Retrospective Follow Up Study. Int J Gen Med 2024; 17:93-103. [PMID: 38226183 PMCID: PMC10789569 DOI: 10.2147/ijgm.s448135] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2023] [Accepted: 01/10/2024] [Indexed: 01/17/2024] Open
Abstract
Background A pacemaker is a device implanted in the chest to help people with symptomatic bradycardia and life-threatening irregular rhythm. However, it is also associated with many complications. Therefore, this study evaluated pacemaker-related complications and factors associated with them, as there is little data on pacemaker-related complications in sub-Saharan Africa and Ethiopia. Methods The study was conducted on 118 patients over 18 years old who had pacemakers implanted between 2017 and 2022 at Tikur Anbessa Comprehensive Specialized Hospital in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia who were reviewed by the authors from September 2022 to December 2022. Sociodemographic factors, clinical characteristics, and complications data were extracted using a structured questionnaire by retrospective review of patient records. The chi-square test or Fisher's exact test was performed to evaluate factors associated with complications. Results The median age of patients was 60.5 years (IQR = 15 years), with men accounting for 50.8% of patients. Hypertension was the most common comorbidity (64.2%). Symptomatic grade 3 AV block was the most common indication (78.8%) for pacemaker implantation. With a mean follow-up of 3.92 ± 1.94 years, 15.3% of patients had complications. Pneumothorax, pocket site infection, and lead dislodgement were the most common complications occurring in 2.54% of patients each. Patient age during surgery (p-value = 0.02), patient gender (p-value = 0.04), pacemaker implanting team (p-value = 0.01), and adherence to follow-up (p-value = 0.04) are related to pacemakers-related complications. Conclusion Pacemaker implantation is associated with many complications. Pneumothorax, pacemaker pocket infection, and lead dislodgement were the most common complications. Patient age at pacemaker implantation, patient gender, pacemaker implanting team, and follow-up compliance were factors associated with pacemaker-related complications. Skill development through specialized training and compliance counseling may improve outcomes for patients who have complications related to pacemaker implanting team and poor adherence to follow.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sura Markos
- Internal Medicine Department, Hawassa University, Hawassa, Ethiopia
| | - Mohammed Nasir
- Pediatrics Department, Hawassa University, Hawassa, Ethiopia
| | - Muluken Ahmed
- Pediatrics Department, Arba Minch University, Arba Minch, Ethiopia
| | - Sintayehu Abebe
- Internal Medicine Department, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | | | - Demu Tesfaye
- Internal Medicine Department, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Butter C, Klein G, Grönefeld G, Böcker D, Suling A, Buchholz A, Felk A, Hauser T, Wegscheider K, Bänsch D. Relationship between ICD implantation volume and treatment parameters of patients receiving an ICD with remote monitoring. Technol Health Care 2024; 32:1583-1593. [PMID: 37955096 DOI: 10.3233/thc-230641] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Both highly specialized heart centres and less specialized hospitals care for patients with implantable ICDs/CRT-Ds with remote monitoring. OBJECTIVE To investigate potential differences in patient treatment according to centre's ICD implantation volume. METHODS Based on their 2012 ICD/CRT-D implantation volume, centres enrolled in the NORDIC ICD trial in Germany were assigned to one of three groups: high- (HV, n= 345), medium- (MV, n= 340) or low-volume (LV, n= 189). RESULTS The HV-centres had a significant higher CRT-D proportion (41.7%; LV: 36.5%; MV: 23.2%; P𝑔𝑙𝑜𝑏𝑎𝑙< 0.001), significant shorter median procedure duration (49 min; MV: 58 min; LV: 60 min; P𝑔𝑙𝑜𝑏𝑎𝑙< 0.001) but significant longer median hospital stay (4 days; MV and LV: 3 days; P𝑔𝑙𝑜𝑏𝑎𝑙< 0.001) compared to MV- and LV-centres. The X-ray exposure was shorter in MV/HV-centres (MV: 3.4 min; HV: 3.6 min; LV: 5.5 min; P𝑔𝑙𝑜𝑏𝑎𝑙< 0.001). Only 3.5% (LV: 2.6%; HV: 3.5%; MV: 4.1%) patients received at least one delivered inappropriate shock and 2.5% (HV: 2.0%; LV: 2.6%; MV: 2.9%) patients had withheld inappropriate ICD shocks without subsequent inappropriate shock delivery within 24.5 months of median follow-up. CONCLUSION Implantation volume-dependent differences were observed in the device selection, procedure duration and x-ray exposure duration. Remote monitoring in combination with adequate response pattern prevented imminent inappropriate shocks in all three groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian Butter
- Department of Cardiology, Heart Centre Brandenburg Bernau and Faculty of Health Sciences Brandenburg, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Bernau, Germany
| | - Gunnar Klein
- Heart Center Hannover, Clinic for Cardiology and Electrophysiology, Hannover, Germany
| | | | - Dirk Böcker
- Department of Cardiology, St. Marien Hospital, Hamm, Germany
| | - Anna Suling
- University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Institute of Medical Biometry and Epidemiology, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Anika Buchholz
- University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Institute of Medical Biometry and Epidemiology, Hamburg, Germany
| | | | | | - Karl Wegscheider
- University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Institute of Medical Biometry and Epidemiology, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Dietmar Bänsch
- Department of Rhythmology and Clinical Electrophysiology, KMG Clinic, Güstrow, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Kowlgi GN, Vaidya V, Dai MY, Mishra R, Hodge DO, Deshmukh AJ, Mulpuru SK, Friedman PA, Cha YM. Trends in the 30-year span of Noninfectious Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Device Complications in Olmsted County. MEDRXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR HEALTH SCIENCES 2023:2023.05.09.23289751. [PMID: 37214896 PMCID: PMC10197787 DOI: 10.1101/2023.05.09.23289751] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/24/2023]
Abstract
Background Cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) such as permanent pacemakers, implantable cardioverter-defibrillators, and cardiac resynchronization therapy devices alleviate morbidity and mortality in various diseases. There is a paucity of real-world data on CIED complications and trends. Objectives Describe trends in noninfectious CIED complications over the past three decades in Olmsted County. Methods The Rochester Epidemiology Project is a medical records linkage system comprising records of over 500,000 residents of Olmsted County from 1966-current. CIED implants between 1988-2018 were determined. Trends in noninfectious complications within 30 days of implant were analyzed. Results 175 out of 2536 (6.9%) patients who received CIED experienced device complications. 3.8% of the implants had major complications requiring intervention. Lead dislodgement was the most common (2.9%), followed by hematoma (2.1%). Complications went up from 1988 to 2005, then showed a downtrend until 2018, driven by a decline in hematomas in the last decade (p<0.01). Those with complications were more likely to have prosthetic valves. Obesity appeared to have a protective effect in a multivariate regression model. The mean Charlson comorbidity score has trended up over the 30 years. Conclusions Our study describes a real-world trend of CIED complications over three decades. Lead dislodgements and hematomas were the most common complications. Complications have declined over the last decade due to safer practices and a better understanding of anticoagulant management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gurukripa N Kowlgi
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Vaibhav Vaidya
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Ming-Yan Dai
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Rahul Mishra
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - David O Hodge
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA
| | - Abhishek J Deshmukh
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Siva K Mulpuru
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA
| | - Paul A Friedman
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA
| | - Yong-Mei Cha
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Malaczynska-Rajpold K, Elliot M, Wijesuriya N, Mehta V, Wong T, Rinaldi CA, Behar JM. Leadless Cardiac Pacing: New Horizons. Cardiol Ther 2023; 12:21-33. [PMID: 36417178 PMCID: PMC9986180 DOI: 10.1007/s40119-022-00288-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2022] [Accepted: 10/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Since the introduction of transvenous cardiac pacing leads, pacemaker system design has remained similar for several decades. Progressive miniaturisation of electronic circuitry and batteries has enabled a smaller, single pacing unit comprising the intracardiac electrodes, generator and computer. This review explores the development of leadless pacing, the clinical trials comparing leadless to transvenous pacing in addition to the future developments of multi-chamber leadless pacing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katarzyna Malaczynska-Rajpold
- Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospitals, Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Westminster Bridge Road, London, SE1, UK
| | - Mark Elliot
- St Thomas' Hospital, Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, Kings College London, London, UK
| | - Nadeev Wijesuriya
- St Thomas' Hospital, Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, Kings College London, London, UK
| | - Vishal Mehta
- St Thomas' Hospital, Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, Kings College London, London, UK
| | - Tom Wong
- Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospitals, Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Westminster Bridge Road, London, SE1, UK
| | - Christopher Aldo Rinaldi
- St Thomas' Hospital, Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, Kings College London, London, UK
| | - Jonathan M Behar
- Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospitals, Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Westminster Bridge Road, London, SE1, UK.
- St Thomas' Hospital, Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
- Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, Kings College London, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Wang X, Zhang Y, Zhang Y. A new method for localizing the landmark of axillary vein and its application. Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J 2022; 22:231-234. [PMID: 35926684 PMCID: PMC9463472 DOI: 10.1016/j.ipej.2022.07.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2022] [Accepted: 07/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaxia Wang
- The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Department of Cardiology, Qingdao University, 266003, Qingdao, China
| | - Yongtao Zhang
- The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Department of Cardiology, Qingdao University, 266003, Qingdao, China
| | - Yingying Zhang
- The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Department of Cardiology, Qingdao University, 266003, Qingdao, China.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Vijayarajan V, Kritharides L, Brieger D, Cheng YY, Chow V, Ng ACC. Sex differences in rates of permanent pacemaker implantation and in-hospital complications: A statewide cohort study of over 7 million persons from 2009–2018. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0272305. [PMID: 35947540 PMCID: PMC9365143 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272305] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2022] [Accepted: 07/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Whether a bias exists in the implantation of permanent pacemakers (PPI) and complications according to sex and age in the Australian population is unclear. Hypothesis Population rate of PPI and its complications differed between men and women. Methods We examined the prevalence of PPI from January-2009 to December-2018 from datasets held by the New South Wales (NSW) Centre-for-Health-Record-Linkage, including patient’s characteristics and in-hospital complications. All analysis was stratified by sex and age by decade. Results A total of 28,714 admissions involved PPI (40% women). The mean PPI rate (±standard-deviation) and median age (interquartile range) was 2,871±242 per-annum and 80yrs (73-86yrs), respectively. At the same time-period, the mean NSW population size was 7,487,393±315,505 persons (50% women; n = 3,773,756±334,912). The mean annual age-adjusted rate of PPI was 125.5±11.6 per-100,000-men, compared to 63.4±14.3 per-100,000-women (P<0.01). The mean annual rate of PPI increased from 2009–2017 by 0.9±3.3% in men, compared to 0.4±4.4% in women (P<0.01) suggesting a widening disparity. Total non-fatal in-hospital complications was higher in women compared to men (8.2% vs 6.6%, P<0.01), and this persisted throughout study period even after adjusting for multiple covariates. Overall, in-hospital mortality was low (0.73%) and similar between sexes. Conclusion In a statewide Australian population exceeding 7 million, PPI rates were consistently nearly two-fold higher for men compared to women over 10-years, with an apparently widening disparity, that was not explained by age. Overall complication rates were higher in women. Future studies should examine the aetiology behind this disparity in PPI rates, as well as its complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Leonard Kritharides
- Department of Cardiology, Concord Hospital, The University of Sydney, Concord, NSW, Australia
| | - David Brieger
- Department of Cardiology, Concord Hospital, The University of Sydney, Concord, NSW, Australia
| | - Yeu-Yao Cheng
- Department of Cardiology, Concord Hospital, The University of Sydney, Concord, NSW, Australia
| | - Vincent Chow
- Department of Cardiology, Concord Hospital, The University of Sydney, Concord, NSW, Australia
| | - Austin Chin Chwan Ng
- Department of Cardiology, Concord Hospital, The University of Sydney, Concord, NSW, Australia
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Taleski J, Stankovik S, Risteski D, Janusevski F, Pocesta B, Zimbakov Z, Poposka L. Sex-related differences regarding cephalic vein lead access for CIEDs implantation. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ARRHYTHMIA 2021. [DOI: 10.1186/s42444-021-00049-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Minimally invasive and safe central venous access is imperative for lead insertion of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs). The purpose of this trial was to explore and compare the usability of the cephalic vein (CV) between both sexes.
Methods and results
This single-center prospective study included 102 consecutive patients in a period of six months. Pre-procedural contrast-enhanced venographic images of the upper arm were performed in all included patients. Our attention was focused on comparing several morpho-anatomical CV characteristics such as venous diameter, presence of valves and angle of entrance of the CV into the subclavian vein (SV). Study results concerning the CV morpho-anatomical differences were more favorable regarding the female patient group, with significant differences in CV diameter (p-0.030). There was also a difference in favor of the female group regarding the favorable CV angle of entrance into the SV, found in the 61.7% versus 54.4% in the male patient group. The comparison of usability of the CV and CVC technique was explored by comparing the number of leads inserted through the CV in both sexes. Two leads were implanted in 11.7% in the female group versus 5.8% in the male group, and 0 leads through the CV in 38.2% of the female patients versus 50% of male group.
Conclusion
Female patients have more favorable cephalic vein morpho-anatomical futures and better usability for lead placement than male patients.
Collapse
|
13
|
Abstract
Leadless pacemakers (LPs) have revolutionized the field of pacing by miniaturizing pacemakers and rendering them completelty intracardiac, hence reducing complications related to pacemaker pockets and transvenous leads. However, first generation LPs appear to be associated with a higher rate of myocardial perforation as compared to transvenous pacemakers (TV-PPM). Currently, LPs are predominantly designed to pace the right ventricle with no LPs that provide atrial or biventricular pacing. In this article, we review the available data on LPs while advocating for the need for a randomized controlled trial comparing LPs to TV-PPMs. In addition, we review the future directions of leadless devices.
Collapse
|
14
|
Jangid S, Das D, Choudhury M. Inadvertent Right Ventricle Perforation by Temporary Pacemaker Lead: A Case Report Requiring Surgical Exploration. JOURNAL OF CARDIAC CRITICAL CARE TSS 2021. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1724144] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022] Open
Abstract
AbstractRight ventricle perforation by pacemaker lead is rare but a life-threatening complication. It may present acutely within few hours of pacemaker implantation as hemopericardium, dreaded cardiac tamponade, leading to acute hemodynamic deterioration; even death, if not address immediately. At times, it presents gradually with progressive decline in hemodynamic and requires surgical exploration.The authors report a case of 51-year old female whose hemodynamic worsens gradually after temporary pacemaker implantation, requiring surgical exploration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Surendra Jangid
- Department of Cardiac Anaesthesia, Cardiothoracic Centre, CNC, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi, India
| | - Devishree Das
- Department of Cardiac Anaesthesia, Cardiothoracic Centre, CNC, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi, India
| | - Minati Choudhury
- Department of Cardiac Anaesthesia, Cardiothoracic Centre, CNC, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi, India
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Surendran PJ, Jacob P, Selvamani D, Papasavvas T, Swaminathan N, Mathew G, Praveen R. Upper extremity dysfunctions in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices: a systematic review. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THERAPY AND REHABILITATION 2021. [DOI: 10.12968/ijtr.2020.0160] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
Background/Aims The prevalence of cardiac implantable electronic devices has risen considerably during recent years. This has revolutionised the treatment of cardiac arrhythmias, which in turn reduced the incidence of sudden cardiac death. There are several complications associated with cardiac implantable electronic device implantation. Upper extremity dysfunction is one of the complications associated with this procedure and it should be addressed, since it can affect activities of daily living. This systematic review analysed the prevailing evidence pertaining to the common upper extremity dysfunctions associated with receiving a cardiac implantable electronic device. Methods A comprehensive literature search was conducted using PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, EMBASE (through Cochrane) and Google Scholar for original research published in the English language. The Rayyan QCRI web application was used for study selection and the decision-making process. PRISMA guidelines were used to conduct and report this review. The methodological quality of the included studies was appraised using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale and Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tool for analytic cross-sectional studies and case reports. Results This systematic review included eight studies with a total of 696 participants. The most common upper extremity dysfunctions associated with receiving a cardiac implantable electronic device were pain and limitation of shoulder range of motion. Limitation of range of motion could be persisted even in the long term after having a cardiac implantable electronic device implanted. Conclusions Contributing factors of upper extremity dysfunctions included size of the device, pectoral site of implantation and upper extremity immobilisation practices. Upper extremity dysfunction is an overlooked complication, as it received a relatively low priority, although it may negatively impact quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Prasobh Jacob
- Department of Cardiac Rehabilitation, Heart Hospital, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar
| | - Dineshkumar Selvamani
- Department of Cardiac Rehabilitation, Heart Hospital, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar
| | - Theodoros Papasavvas
- Department of Cardiac Rehabilitation, Heart Hospital, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar
| | - Narasimman Swaminathan
- Faculty of Allied health sciences and Physiotherapy, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research, Chennai, India
| | - Gigi Mathew
- Department of Cardiac Rehabilitation, Heart Hospital, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar
| | - Reshma Praveen
- Department of Physiotherapy, Hamad General Hospital, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Blomström-Lundqvist C, Traykov V, Erba PA, Burri H, Nielsen JC, Bongiorni MG, Poole J, Boriani G, Costa R, Deharo JC, Epstein LM, Saghy L, Snygg-Martin U, Starck C, Tascini C, Strathmore N. European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) international consensus document on how to prevent, diagnose, and treat cardiac implantable electronic device infections-endorsed by the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS), the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society (LAHRS), International Society for Cardiovascular Infectious Diseases (ISCVID) and the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID) in collaboration with the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Europace 2021; 22:515-549. [PMID: 31702000 PMCID: PMC7132545 DOI: 10.1093/europace/euz246] [Citation(s) in RCA: 186] [Impact Index Per Article: 62.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2019] [Accepted: 08/19/2019] [Indexed: 01/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Pacemakers, implantable cardiac defibrillators, and cardiac resynchronization therapy devices are potentially life-saving treatments for a number of cardiac conditions, but are not without risk. Most concerning is the risk of a cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infection, which is associated with significant morbidity, increased hospitalizations, reduced survival, and increased healthcare costs. Recommended preventive strategies such as administration of intravenous antibiotics before implantation are well recognized. Uncertainties have remained about the role of various preventive, diagnostic, and treatment measures such as skin antiseptics, pocket antibiotic solutions, anti-bacterial envelopes, prolonged antibiotics post-implantation, and others. Guidance on whether to use novel device alternatives expected to be less prone to infections and novel oral anticoagulants is also limited, as are definitions on minimum quality requirements for centres and operators and volumes. Moreover, an international consensus document on management of CIED infections is lacking. The recognition of these issues, the dissemination of results from important randomized trials focusing on prevention of CIED infections, and observed divergences in managing device-related infections as found in an European Heart Rhythm Association worldwide survey, provided a strong incentive for a 2019 International State-of-the-art Consensus document on risk assessment, prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of CIED infections.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Vassil Traykov
- Department of Invasive Electrophysiology and Cardiac Pacing, Acibadem City Clinic Tokuda Hospital, Sofia, Bulgaria
| | - Paola Anna Erba
- Nuclear Medicine, Department of Translational Research and New Technology in Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy, and University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Medical Imaging Center, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Haran Burri
- Department of Cardiology, University Hospital of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | | | - Maria Grazia Bongiorni
- Division of Cardiology and Arrhythmology, CardioThoracic and Vascular Department, University Hospital of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Jeanne Poole
- Division of Cardiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Giuseppe Boriani
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Policlinico di Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - Roberto Costa
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Heart Institute (InCor) of the University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Jean-Claude Deharo
- Department of Cardiology, Aix Marseille Université, CHU la Timone, Marseille, France
| | - Laurence M Epstein
- Electrophysiology, Northwell Health, Hofstra/Northwell School of Medicine, Manhasset, NY, USA
| | - Laszlo Saghy
- Division of Electrophysiology, 2nd Department of Medicine and Cardiology Centre, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
| | - Ulrika Snygg-Martin
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Institute of Biomedicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Christoph Starck
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, German Heart Center Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Carlo Tascini
- First Division of Infectious Diseases, Cotugno Hospital, Azienda ospedaliera dei Colli, Naples, Italy
| | - Neil Strathmore
- Department of Cardiology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Blomström-Lundqvist C, Traykov V, Erba PA, Burri H, Nielsen JC, Bongiorni MG, Poole J, Boriani G, Costa R, Deharo JC, Epstein LM, Saghy L, Snygg-Martin U, Starck C, Tascini C, Strathmore N. European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) international consensus document on how to prevent, diagnose, and treat cardiac implantable electronic device infections-endorsed by the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS), the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society (LAHRS), International Society for Cardiovascular Infectious Diseases (ISCVID) and the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID) in collaboration with the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2021; 57:e1-e31. [PMID: 31724720 DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezz296] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2019] [Accepted: 08/19/2019] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Pacemakers, implantable cardiac defibrillators, and cardiac resynchronization therapy devices are potentially life-saving treatments for a number of cardiac conditions, but are not without risk. Most concerning is the risk of a cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infection, which is associated with significant morbidity, increased hospitalizations, reduced survival, and increased healthcare costs. Recommended preventive strategies such as administration of intravenous antibiotics before implantation are well recognized. Uncertainties have remained about the role of various preventive, diagnostic, and treatment measures such as skin antiseptics, pocket antibiotic solutions, anti-bacterial envelopes, prolonged antibiotics post-implantation, and others. Guidance on whether to use novel device alternatives expected to be less prone to infections and novel oral anticoagulants is also limited, as are definitions on minimum quality requirements for centres and operators and volumes. Moreover, an international consensus document on management of CIED infections is lacking. The recognition of these issues, the dissemination of results from important randomized trials focusing on prevention of CIED infections, and observed divergences in managing device-related infections as found in an European Heart Rhythm Association worldwide survey, provided a strong incentive for a 2019 International State-of-the-art Consensus document on risk assessment, prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of CIED infections.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Vassil Traykov
- Department of Invasive Electrophysiology and Cardiac Pacing, Acibadem City Clinic Tokuda Hospital, Sofia, Bulgaria
| | - Paola Anna Erba
- Nuclear Medicine, Department of Translational Research and New Technology in Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy, and University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Medical Imaging Center, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Haran Burri
- Department of Cardiology, University Hospital of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | | | - Maria Grazia Bongiorni
- Division of Cardiology and Arrhythmology, CardioThoracic and Vascular Department, University Hospital of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Jeanne Poole
- Division of Cardiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Giuseppe Boriani
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Policlinico di Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - Roberto Costa
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Heart Institute (InCor) of the University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Jean-Claude Deharo
- Department of Cardiology, Aix Marseille Université, CHU la Timone, Marseille, France
| | - Laurence M Epstein
- Electrophysiology, Northwell Health, Hofstra/Northwell School of Medicine, Manhasset, NY, USA
| | - Laszlo Saghy
- Division of Electrophysiology, 2nd Department of Medicine and Cardiology Centre, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
| | - Ulrika Snygg-Martin
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Institute of Biomedicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Christoph Starck
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, German Heart Center Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Carlo Tascini
- First Division of Infectious Diseases, Cotugno Hospital, Azienda ospedaliera dei Colli, Naples, Italy
| | - Neil Strathmore
- Department of Cardiology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Blomström-Lundqvist C, Traykov V, Erba PA, Burri H, Nielsen JC, Bongiorni MG, Poole J, Boriani G, Costa R, Deharo JC, Epstein LM, Sághy L, Snygg-Martin U, Starck C, Tascini C, Strathmore N. European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) international consensus document on how to prevent, diagnose, and treat cardiac implantable electronic device infections-endorsed by the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS), the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society (LAHRS), International Society for Cardiovascular Infectious Diseases (ISCVID), and the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID) in collaboration with the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J 2021; 41:2012-2032. [PMID: 32101604 DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 101] [Impact Index Per Article: 33.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2019] [Revised: 10/07/2019] [Accepted: 01/10/2020] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Pacemakers, implantable cardiac defibrillators, and cardiac resynchronization therapy devices are potentially lifesaving treatments for a number of cardiac conditions but are not without risk. Most concerning is the risk of a cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infection, which is associated with significant morbidity, increased hospitalizations, reduced survival, and increased health care costs. Recommended preventive strategies such as administration of intravenous antibiotics before implantation are well-recognized. Uncertainties have remained about the role of various preventive, diagnostic, and treatment measures such as skin antiseptics, pocket antibiotic solutions, antibacterial envelopes, prolonged antibiotics post-implantation, and others. When compared with previous guidelines or consensus statements, the present consensus document gives guidance on the use of novel device alternatives, novel oral anticoagulants, antibacterial envelopes, prolonged antibiotics post-implantation, as well as definitions on minimum quality requirements for centres and operators and volumes. The recognition that an international consensus document focused on management of CIED infections is lacking, the dissemination of results from new important randomized trials focusing on prevention of CIED infections, and observed divergences in managing device-related infections as found in an European Heart Rhythm Association worldwide survey, provided a strong incentive for a Novel 2019 International State-of-the-art Consensus document on risk assessment, prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of CIED infections.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Vassil Traykov
- Department of Invasive Electrophysiology and Cardiac Pacing, Acibadem City Clinic Tokuda Hospital, Nikola Vaptsarov blvd 51 B, 1 407 Sofia, Bulgaria
| | - Paola Anna Erba
- Department of Translational Research and New Technology in Medicine, University of Pisa-AOUP, Lungarno Antonio Pacinotti, 43, 56126 Pisa PI, Italy.,Department of Nuclear Medicine & Molecular Imaging University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9712 CP Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Haran Burri
- Department of Cardiology, University Hospital of Geneva, Rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil 4, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Jens Cosedis Nielsen
- Department of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Blvd. 161, 8200 Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Maria Grazia Bongiorni
- CardioThoracic and Vascular Department, University Hospital of Pisa, Via Paradisa 2, 56125 Pisa PI, Italy
| | - Jeanne Poole
- Department of Cardiology, University of Washington, Roosevelt Way NE, Seattle, WA 98115, USA
| | - Giuseppe Boriani
- Cardiology Division, Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Policlinico di Modena, Largo del Pozzo, 71, 41125 Modena, Italy
| | - Roberto Costa
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Heart Institute (InCor) of the University of São Paulo, Butanta, São Paulo - State of São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Jean-Claude Deharo
- Department of Cardiology, Aix Marseille Université, CHU la Timone, 278 Rue Saint-Pierre, 13005 Marseille, France
| | - Laurence M Epstein
- Electrophysiology, Northwell Health, Hofstra/Northwell School of Medicine, 300 Community Drive, Manhasset, NY 11030, USA
| | - László Sághy
- Electrophysiology Division, 2nd Department of Medicine and Cardiology Centre, University of Szeged, Aradi vértanúk tere 1, 6720 Szeged, Hungary
| | - Ulrika Snygg-Martin
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, 405 30 Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Christoph Starck
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, German Heart Center Berlin, Augustenburger Pl. 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany
| | - Carlo Tascini
- First Division of Infectious Diseases, Cotugno Hospital, Azienda ospedaliera dei Colli, Via Gaetano Quagliariello, 54, 80131 Napoli NA, Italy
| | - Neil Strathmore
- Department of Cardiology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, 300 Grattan St, Parkville VIC 3050, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Rademakers LM, Bracke FA. Cephalic vein access by modified Seldinger technique for lead implantations. PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY: PACE 2021; 44:607-613. [PMID: 33609409 DOI: 10.1111/pace.14200] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2020] [Revised: 01/18/2021] [Accepted: 02/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Venous access for cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) is commonly performed by cephalic venous cut down, or axillary or subclavian vein puncture. The latter technique carries a risk of complications such as pneumothorax or lead crush. Cephalic venous cut down is free of these complications but often less successful due to technical difficulties. We report a highly successful, simplified cephalic venous access with a modified Seldinger technique. METHODS We prospectively studied 221 patients undergoing de novo implantation of a one, two, or three lead device system performed over a 1-year period at our center, and assessed the efficacy of the cephalic vein access including the number of leads successfully placed for each procedure. RESULTS In 83% of patients undergoing CIED implantation, a suitable cephalic vein was present. In respectively 98% and 99% of patients undergoing single- or dual-chamber CIED implantation, lead placement could be performed exclusively via the cephalic vein and in 72% of cardiac resynchronization therapy implants, all three leads were placed via cephalic access. CONCLUSION A novel, technically simple cephalic venous catheterization technique provides high success rates for any CIED lead implantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Frank A Bracke
- Department of Cardiology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Taleski J, Zafirovska B. Strategies to Promote Long-Term Cardiac Implant Site Health. Cureus 2021; 13:e12457. [PMID: 33552775 PMCID: PMC7854325 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.12457] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
In the past several decades there has been a continuous growth in the field of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) implantation procedures as well as their technological development. CIEDs utilize transvenous leads that are introduced into the heart via the axillary, subclavian, or cephalic veins, as well as a devices generator that is implanted in a subcutaneous pocket, typically in the pre-pectoral region. Despite this significant improvement, complication rates range from 1-6% with current implant tools and techniques. In this review we will discuss the three central parts of the CIED implantation procedure, their impact on implantation site, infections, and possibilities for its prevention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jane Taleski
- Electrophysiology and Electrostimulation, University Clinic of Cardiology, Skopje, MKD
| | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Jiménez‐Díaz J, Higuera‐Sobrino F, Piqueras‐Flores J, Pérez‐Díaz P, González‐Marín MA. Fluoroscopy‐guided axillary vein access vs cephalic vein access in pacemaker and defibrillator implantation: Randomized clinical trial of efficacy and safety. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2019; 30:1588-1593. [DOI: 10.1111/jce.14060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2019] [Revised: 06/19/2019] [Accepted: 07/07/2019] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Javier Jiménez‐Díaz
- Arrhythmia Unit, Cardiology DepartmentHospital General Universitario de Ciudad Real Ciudad Real Spain
| | - Felipe Higuera‐Sobrino
- Arrhythmia Unit, Cardiology DepartmentHospital General Universitario de Ciudad Real Ciudad Real Spain
| | - Jesús Piqueras‐Flores
- Cardiology DepartmentHospital General Universitario de Ciudad Real Ciudad Real Spain
| | - Pedro Pérez‐Díaz
- Cardiology DepartmentHospital General Universitario de Ciudad Real Ciudad Real Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Warpechowski Neto S, Ley LLG, Almeida ED, Saffi MAL, Dutra LZ, Ley ALG, Sant'Anna RT, Lima GGD, Kalil RAK, Leiria TLL. Unscheduled Emergency Visits after Cardiac Devices Implantation: Comparison between Cardioverter Defibrillators and Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Devices in less than one year of Follow Up. Arq Bras Cardiol 2019; 112:491-498. [PMID: 30810607 PMCID: PMC6555569 DOI: 10.5935/abc.20190018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2018] [Accepted: 09/05/2018] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The use of Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Devices (CIED), such as the Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (ICD) and Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT), is increasing. The number of leads may vary according to the device. Lead placement in the left ventricle increases surgical time and may be associated with greater morbidity after hospital discharge, an event that is often confused with the underlying disease severity. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the rate of unscheduled emergency hospitalizations and death after implantable device surgery stratified by the type of device. METHODS Prospective cohort study of 199 patients submitted to cardiac device implantation. The groups were stratified according to the type of device: ICD group (n = 124) and CRT group (n = 75). Probability estimates were analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method according to the outcome. A value of p < 0.05 was considered significant in the statistical analyses. RESULTS Most of the sample comprised male patients (71.9%), with a mean age of 61.1 ± 14.2. Left ventricular ejection fraction was similar between the groups (CRT 37.4 ± 18.1 vs. ICD 39.1 ± 17.0, p = 0.532). The rate of unscheduled visits to the emergency unit related to the device was 4.8% in the ICD group and 10.6% in the CRT group (p = 0.20). The probability of device-related survival of the variable "death" was different between the groups (p = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS Patients after CRT implantation show a higher probability of mortality after surgery at a follow-up of less than 1 year. The rate of unscheduled hospital visits, related or not to the implant, does not differ between the groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefan Warpechowski Neto
- Instituto de Cardiologia / Fundação Universitária de Cardiologia (IC/FUC), Porto Alegre, RS - Brazil
| | | | - Eduardo Dytz Almeida
- Instituto de Cardiologia / Fundação Universitária de Cardiologia (IC/FUC), Porto Alegre, RS - Brazil
| | | | - Luiza Zwan Dutra
- Instituto de Cardiologia / Fundação Universitária de Cardiologia (IC/FUC), Porto Alegre, RS - Brazil
| | - Antonio Lessa Gaudie Ley
- Instituto de Cardiologia / Fundação Universitária de Cardiologia (IC/FUC), Porto Alegre, RS - Brazil
| | - Roberto Tofani Sant'Anna
- Instituto de Cardiologia / Fundação Universitária de Cardiologia (IC/FUC), Porto Alegre, RS - Brazil
| | - Gustavo Glotz de Lima
- Instituto de Cardiologia / Fundação Universitária de Cardiologia (IC/FUC), Porto Alegre, RS - Brazil
| | - Renato Abdala Karam Kalil
- Instituto de Cardiologia / Fundação Universitária de Cardiologia (IC/FUC), Porto Alegre, RS - Brazil
| | - Tiago Luiz Luz Leiria
- Instituto de Cardiologia / Fundação Universitária de Cardiologia (IC/FUC), Porto Alegre, RS - Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Safety of Permanent Pacemaker Implantation: A Prospective Study. J Clin Med 2019; 8:jcm8010035. [PMID: 30609668 PMCID: PMC6352172 DOI: 10.3390/jcm8010035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2018] [Revised: 12/24/2018] [Accepted: 12/26/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Although pacemaker implantation is considered to be low risk, it is not exempt from complications and technical failures during the procedure, both in the short and long term, and the complications that such patients may present remain unknown. The aim has been to analyze the complication rates associated with permanent pacing and to identify if these differ between patients with or without previous antithrombotic therapy. We used a prospective, single center, observational study of 310 adult patients with indications of permanent pacing. They were hospitalized from 1 January to 31 December 2014 and followed up for 6 months after the pacemaker implant. The participants were distributed into two groups according to the antithrombotic therapy prior to the implant. The most frequent major complications were pneumothorax (3.87%) and lead dislodgement (8.39%), while superficial phlebitis (12.90%) and uncomplicated hematomas (22.58%) were presented as the most recurrent minor complications. Hematomas were the most frequent minor complication in the antithrombotic therapy cohort, and shoulder pain was reported as the most recurrent minor complication in the non-exposed group. Finding out about complications in pacemaker implants enables a complete view of the process, and hence the prioritization of actions aimed at improving safety and reducing associated risks.
Collapse
|
24
|
Abstract
Transvenous approaches for pacemaker and defibrillator lead insertion offer numerous advantages over epicardial techniques. Although the cephalic, axillary, and subclavian veins are most commonly used in clinical practice, they each offer their own set of advantages and disadvantages that leave their usage dependent on patient anatomy and physician preference. Alternative methods using the upper and lower venous circulation have been described when these veins are not available or practical for lead insertion. Until current technology is superseded by leadless pacing systems, the search for the optimal lead insertion technique continues.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ali Bak Al-Hadithi
- UCLA Cardiac Arrhythmia Center, UCLA Health System, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, 100 UCLA Medical Plaza, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
| | - Duc H Do
- UCLA Cardiac Arrhythmia Center, UCLA Health System, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, 100 UCLA Medical Plaza, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
| | - Noel G Boyle
- UCLA Cardiac Arrhythmia Center, UCLA Health System, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, 100 UCLA Medical Plaza, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Taleski J, Poposka L, Janusevski F, Pocesta B, Boskov V, Boyle NG. Scoring System Assessment of Cephalic Vein Access for Device Implantation. J Innov Card Rhythm Manag 2018; 9:3284-3290. [PMID: 32477819 PMCID: PMC7252762 DOI: 10.19102/icrm.2018.090802] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2017] [Accepted: 12/30/2017] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to explore the usability of the cephalic vein (CV) for cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) lead access by applying a scoring system to assess the venous anatomy. This prospective, single-center study included 100 consecutive patients who underwent CIED implantation within a period of one year. Contrast-enhanced venography images were obtained for every patient, focused on the CV, "T-junction," and the subclavian/axillary veins (SV/AVs). Though careful examination of the images, an angle, valves, diameter, noncollateral (AVDnC) score was constructed and used to aid in choosing a CV or SV/AV access approach; in all cases, however, the preferred approach was CV independent of the AVDnC score result obtained. Upon use of the scoring system, the majority of patients (54%) had type A score result (≥ 3), indicating a favorable anatomy for CV access. In 48 of these patients, the CV was used for the implantation of at least one lead. The remaining 46 (46%) patients had type B score result (≤ 2). In 41 patients from this group, SV/AV access was used for lead implantation and, in five patients, CV access was used. The number of leads introduced through the CV was associated with larger score and the operator's experience. In conclusion, in more than 50% of patients, at least one lead could be introduced through the CV. The scoring system used herein can simplify the choice between CV and SV/AV access and could eventually increase the efficiency and safety of the procedure, especially when less experienced implanters are involved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jane Taleski
- Department of Electrostimulation and Electrophysiology, University Clinic of Cardiology, Skopje, R. Macedonia
| | - Lidija Poposka
- Department of Electrostimulation and Electrophysiology, University Clinic of Cardiology, Skopje, R. Macedonia
| | - Filip Janusevski
- Department of Electrostimulation and Electrophysiology, University Clinic of Cardiology, Skopje, R. Macedonia
| | - Bekim Pocesta
- Department of Electrostimulation and Electrophysiology, University Clinic of Cardiology, Skopje, R. Macedonia
| | - Vladimir Boskov
- Department of Electrostimulation and Electrophysiology, University Clinic of Cardiology, Skopje, R. Macedonia
| | - Noel G Boyle
- University of California Los Angeles Cardiac Arrhythmia Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Safety and feasibility of leadless pacemaker in patients undergoing atrioventricular node ablation for atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm 2018; 15:994-1000. [DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2018.02.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2018] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
|
27
|
Comparative study of acute and mid-term complications with leadless and transvenous cardiac pacemakers. Heart Rhythm 2018; 15:1023-1030. [DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2018.04.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2017] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
|
28
|
Magnusson P, Liv P. Living with a pacemaker: patient-reported outcome of a pacemaker system. BMC Cardiovasc Disord 2018; 18:110. [PMID: 29866050 PMCID: PMC5987385 DOI: 10.1186/s12872-018-0849-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2017] [Accepted: 05/24/2018] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The aim of this study was to assess among pacemaker patients their overall satisfaction with the pacemaker system, pain, soreness/discomfort, cosmetic results, restrictions due to impaired movement of the shoulder/arm/chest, related sleep disturbances, and concern about possible device malfunction. Methods The seven-item questionnaire was mailed to patients from a single center who had a pacemaker implant or replacement between 2006 and 2016. A higher score indicated worse outcome on a visual analog scale (VAS) of 0–100 mm. Results The response rate was 75.5% and 342 questionniares were analyzed. Median age of respondents was 77.6 years and 57.0% were males. In total, 65 complications requiring surgery (10 pocket corrections (2.9%), 5 in females) occurred during a median follow-up of 5.6 years.The distribution of the primary outcome had a median score of 5 while the 75th percentile was 13. Cosmetic appearance was significantly associated with reoperation (but not other variables). Overall scores for men and women were 5 vs. 6, respectively, which achieved significance (p = 0.042). Median ratings of pain, soreness/discomfort, cosmetic appearance, range of motion, sleep, and concern about device malfunction were all ≤5. Females reported worse outcomes for all questions, except for cosmetic results and concern about malfunction. Conclusions The vast majority of patients report excellent overall satisfaction with the pacemaker system, and are not affected by pain, soreness/discomfort, or concern about device malfunction. They also reported favourable outcomes with respect to cosmetic results, shoulder movement, and sleep. However, some patients underwent a surgical correction of the pacemaker pocket.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Magnusson
- Cardiology Research Unit, Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital/Solna, SE-171 76, Stockholm, Sweden. .,Centre for Research and Development, Uppsala University/Region Gävleborg, Gävle, Sweden.
| | - Per Liv
- Centre for Research and Development, Uppsala University/Region Gävleborg, Gävle, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Perforación cardiaca posterior al implante de marcapasos: reporte de caso y revisión de la literatura. CIRUGIA CARDIOVASCULAR 2018. [DOI: 10.1016/j.circv.2017.11.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
|
30
|
Kajiyama T, Ueda M, Ishimura M, Hashiguchi N, Nakano M, Kondo Y, Kobayashi Y. A novel technique for ligation of the cephalic vein reduces hemorrhaging during a two-in-one insertion of dual cardiac device leads. Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J 2018; 18:152-154. [PMID: 29660446 PMCID: PMC6090004 DOI: 10.1016/j.ipej.2018.04.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2018] [Revised: 03/23/2018] [Accepted: 04/12/2018] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
The cutdown technique for the cephalic vein is a common access route for transvenous cardiac device leads (TVLs), and sometimes one cephalic vein can accomodate two TVLs. We examined a novel ligation technique to balance the hemostasis and lead maneuverability for this two-in-one insertion. A total of 22 patients scheduled for cardiac device implantations with two or more leads were enrolled. The ipsilateral cephalic vein was identified for inserting the TVLs with a cutdown. If two TVLs could be introduced into one cephalic vein, hemostasis was established by ligating the venous wall between the TVLs. We measured the amount of hemorrhaging per minute and the operators assessed the lead maneuverability before and after the ligation. We successfully implanted cardiac devices in 15 patients (68%) with this novel method, whereas only one TVL could be introduced via the cephalic vein in 7 patients. As for the successful patients, hemorrhaging from the gap was significantly reduced (5.6 ± 7.3 to 0.41 ± 0.36g/min, p = 0.016) after the novel ligation. The lead maneuverability was well maintained so there was no difficulty placing the leads into the cardiac chambers in all cases. No major complications were observed. In the present study, the novel ligation method provided significant hemostasis as well as a preserved maneuverability. It could be an optional choice for insertion of multiple TVLs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takatsugu Kajiyama
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Japan.
| | - Marehiko Ueda
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Japan
| | - Masayuki Ishimura
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Japan
| | - Naotaka Hashiguchi
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Japan
| | - Masahiro Nakano
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Japan
| | - Yusuke Kondo
- Department of Advanced Cardiovascular Therapeutics, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Japan
| | - Yoshio Kobayashi
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Affiliation(s)
- Riccardo Cappato
- Cardiac Arrhythmia Research Center, Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Zurbuchen A, Haeberlin A, Bereuter L, Pfenniger A, Bosshard S, Kernen M, Philipp Heinisch P, Fuhrer J, Vogel R. Endocardial Energy Harvesting by Electromagnetic Induction. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2018; 65:424-430. [DOI: 10.1109/tbme.2017.2773568] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
|
33
|
Yeo I, Kim LK, Lerman BB, Cheung JW. Impact of institutional procedural volume on inhospital outcomes after cardiac resynchronization therapy device implantation: US national database 2003–2011. Heart Rhythm 2017; 14:1826-1832. [DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2017.09.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2017] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
34
|
Cantillon DJ, Exner DV, Badie N, Davis K, Gu NY, Nabutovsky Y, Doshi R. Complications and Health Care Costs Associated With Transvenous Cardiac Pacemakers in a Nationwide Assessment. JACC Clin Electrophysiol 2017; 3:1296-1305. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jacep.2017.05.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2016] [Revised: 04/25/2017] [Accepted: 05/26/2017] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
|
35
|
Sochala M, Wahbi K, Sorbets E, Lazarus A, Bécane HM, Stojkovic T, Fayssoil A, Laforêt P, Béhin A, Sroussi M, Eymard B, Duboc D, Meune C. Risk for Complications after Pacemaker or Cardioverter Defibrillator Implantations in Patients with Myotonic Dystrophy Type 1. J Neuromuscul Dis 2017; 4:175-181. [DOI: 10.3233/jnd-170232] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Maximilien Sochala
- Department of Cardiology, AP-HP, Cochin Hospital, Paris Descartes University, Paris, France
| | - Karim Wahbi
- Department of Cardiology, AP-HP, Cochin Hospital, Paris Descartes University, Paris, France
- AP-HP, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Myology Institute, Paris, France
| | - Emmanuel Sorbets
- Department of Cardiology, AP-HP, Avicenne Hospital, Bobigny, France; Paris XIII University, Bobigny, France
| | - Arnaud Lazarus
- InParys Clinical Research Associates, Saint Cloud, Paris, France
| | | | - Tanya Stojkovic
- AP-HP, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Myology Institute, Paris, France
| | | | - Pascal Laforêt
- AP-HP, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Myology Institute, Paris, France
- Pierre and Marie Curie University, Paris, France
| | - Anthony Béhin
- AP-HP, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Myology Institute, Paris, France
| | - Marjorie Sroussi
- Department of Cardiology, AP-HP, Cochin Hospital, Paris Descartes University, Paris, France
| | - Bruno Eymard
- AP-HP, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Myology Institute, Paris, France
- Pierre and Marie Curie University, Paris, France
| | - Denis Duboc
- Department of Cardiology, AP-HP, Cochin Hospital, Paris Descartes University, Paris, France
- AP-HP, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Myology Institute, Paris, France
| | - Christophe Meune
- Department of Cardiology, AP-HP, Avicenne Hospital, Bobigny, France; Paris XIII University, Bobigny, France
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Lee WH, Huang TC, Lin LJ, Lee PT, Lin CC, Lee CH, Chao TH, Li YH, Chen JY. Efficacy of postoperative prophylactic antibiotics in reducing permanent pacemaker infections. Clin Cardiol 2017; 40:559-565. [PMID: 28444977 DOI: 10.1002/clc.22698] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2016] [Accepted: 01/31/2017] [Indexed: 01/29/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite limited evidence, postoperative prophylactic antibiotics are often used in the setting of permanent pacemaker implantation or replacement. The aim of this study is to investigate the efficacy of postoperative antibiotics. HYPOTHESIS Postoperative prophylactic antibiotics may be not clinically useful. METHODS We recruited 367 consecutive patients undergoing permanent pacemaker implantation or generator replacement at a tertiary referral center. Baseline demographics, clinical characteristics, and procedure information were collected, and all patients received preoperative prophylactic antibiotics. Postoperative prophylactic antibiotics were administered at the discretion of the treating physician, and all patients were seen in follow-up every 3 to 6 months for an average follow-up period of 16 months. The primary endpoint was device-related infection. RESULTS A total of 110 patients were treated with preoperative antibiotics only (group 1), whereas 257 patients received both preoperative and postoperative antibiotics (group 2). After a mean follow-up period of 16 months, 1 patient in group 1 (0.9%) and 4 patients in group 2 (1.5%) experienced a device-related infection. There was no significant difference in the rate of infection between the 2 groups (P = 0.624). In the univariate analysis, only the age (60 ± 11 vs 75 ± 12 years, P < 0.001) was significantly different between the infected and noninfected groups. In the multivariate analysis, younger age was an independent risk factor for infective complications (odds ratio = 1.08, P = 0.016). CONCLUSIONS Patients treated with preoperative and postoperative antibiotics had a similar rate of infection as those treated with preoperative antibiotics alone. Further studies are needed to confirm these preliminary findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wen-Huang Lee
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan
| | - Ting-Chun Huang
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital Dou-Liou Branch, Tainan, Taiwan
| | - Li-Jen Lin
- Department of Pharmacology, Institute of Clinical Pharmacy and Biopharmaceutical Science, School of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan
| | - Po-Tseng Lee
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan
| | - Chih-Chan Lin
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan
| | - Cheng-Han Lee
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan
| | - Ting-Hsing Chao
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan
| | - Yi-Heng Li
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan
| | - Ju-Yi Chen
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Shakya S, Matsui H, Fushimi K, Yasunaga H. In-hospital complications after implantation of cardiac implantable electronic devices: Analysis of a national inpatient database in Japan. J Cardiol 2017; 70:405-410. [PMID: 28434707 DOI: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2017.02.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2016] [Revised: 02/16/2017] [Accepted: 02/27/2017] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Complications after implantation of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs), including permanent pacemakers (PMs) and other CIEDs, are associated with increased patient mortality and healthcare costs. This study aimed to investigate overall complications after implantation of CIEDs, analyze the associated risk factors, and compare complications after PM implantation between hospitals that performed only PM implantations (PM-only hospitals) and hospitals that implanted other CIEDs, as well as PMs (all-CIED hospitals). METHODS Using the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination database, we retrospectively collected data on inpatients who underwent CIED implantation from 1 July 2010 to 31 March 2014. RESULTS A total of 77,324 patients were identified, including 64,951 patients with PMs and 12,373 with other CIEDs. The overall incidences of in-hospital complications were 2.5% in patients with PMs and 2.1% in those with other CIEDs. The incidences of pocket infections, pocket problems, device- and lead-related problems, and sepsis were 0.9%, 0.5%, 0.4%, and 0.3%, respectively. The crude proportion of complications after PM implantation was higher in the PM-only hospitals than in the all-CIED hospitals (3.1% vs. 2.1%), but the multivariable logistic regression analysis showed no significant difference (odds ratio, 1.29; 95% confidence interval, 0.99-1.68). CONCLUSION After adjusting for patient backgrounds, the occurrence of complications after PM implantation was not significantly different between patients in PM-only hospitals and those in all-CIED hospitals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandeep Shakya
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Health Economics, School of Public Health, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Cardiology, Asahi General Hospital, Chiba, Japan.
| | - Hiroki Matsui
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Health Economics, School of Public Health, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kiyohide Fushimi
- Department of Health Policy and Informatics, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences (Medicine), Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hideo Yasunaga
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Health Economics, School of Public Health, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Abstract
This case series highlights the rare but potentially life threatening complication of ventricular perforation caused by pacemaker leads and discusses appropriate investigations and management strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Rachana Prasad
- The Lincolnshire Heart Centre, Lincoln County Hospital, Lincoln LN2 5QY, UK
| | - Richard Andrews
- The Lincolnshire Heart Centre, Lincoln County Hospital, Lincoln LN2 5QY, UK
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Liu P, Zhou YF, Yang P, Gao YS, Zhao GR, Ren SY, Li XL. Optimized Axillary Vein Technique versus Subclavian Vein Technique in Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Device Implantation: A Randomized Controlled Study. Chin Med J (Engl) 2017; 129:2647-2651. [PMID: 27823994 PMCID: PMC5126153 DOI: 10.4103/0366-6999.193462] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The conventional venous access for cardiovascular implantable electronic device (CIED) is the subclavian vein, which is often accompanied by high complication rate. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of optimized axillary vein technique. METHODS A total of 247 patients undergoing CIED implantation were included and assigned to the axillary vein group or the subclavian vein group randomly. Success rate of puncture and complications in the perioperative period and follow-ups were recorded. RESULTS The overall success rate (95.7% vs. 96.0%) and one-time success rate (68.4% vs. 66.1%) of punctures were similar between the two groups. In the subclavian vein group, pneumothorax occurred in three patients. The subclavian gaps of three patients were too tight to allow operation of the electrode lead. In contrast, there were no puncture-associated complications in the axillary vein group. In the patient follow-ups, two patients in the subclavian vein group had subclavian crush syndrome and both of them received lead replacement. The incidence of complications during the perioperative period and follow-ups of the axillary vein group and the subclavian vein group was 1.6% (2/125) and 8.2% (10/122), respectively (χ2 = 5.813, P = 0.016). CONCLUSION Optimized axillary vein technique may be superior to the conventional subclavian vein technique for CIED lead placement. TRIAL REGISTRATION www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02358551; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02358551?term=NCT02358551& rank=1.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peng Liu
- Department of Cardiology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing 100029, China
| | - Yi-Feng Zhou
- Department of Cardiology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing 100029, China
| | - Peng Yang
- Department of Cardiology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing 100029, China
| | - Yan-Sha Gao
- Department of Cardiology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing 100029, China
| | - Gui-Ru Zhao
- Department of Cardiology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing 100029, China
| | - Shi-Yan Ren
- Department of Cardiology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing 100029, China
| | - Xian-Lun Li
- Department of Cardiology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing 100029, China
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Melton BL, Howard PA, Goerdt A, Casey J. Association of Uninterrupted Oral Anticoagulation During Cardiac Device Implantation with Pocket Hematoma. Hosp Pharm 2016; 50:761-6. [PMID: 26912915 DOI: 10.1310/hpj5009-761] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Implantation of permanent pacemakers (PPMs) or implantable cardiac defibrillators (ICDs) may be complicated by the development of pocket hematomas. Current practice guidelines provide little guidance to clinicians about the preferred strategy for chronic oral anticoagulation (OAC). The purpose of this study was to examine the frequency and clinical significance of pocket hematoma among patients receiving uninterrupted OAC during cardiac device implantation. METHODS This was a retrospective cohort study of adult patients undergoing cardiac device implantation between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2012, at an academic teaching hospital. Medical records were reviewed for demographics, comorbidities, and medications. The primary outcome was development of pocket hematomas within 30 days of device implantation. Clinical significance was based on the need for additional intervention. Data were assessed using descriptive statistics, logistic regression, and chi-square tests. RESULTS The final cohort included 380 patients. The median age was 68.4 years, and 56.6% were male. Cardiovascular comorbidities were common. Among 80 patients receiving uninterrupted OAC, 71.3% were taking warfarin, 11.2% rivaroxaban, and 17.5% dabigatran. The incidence of pocket hematomas for the entire cohort was 9.7%, of which 1.3% were clinically significant. Pocket hematoma occurred in 21.4% of patients continued on OAC versus 7.7% of those not anticoagulated (P = .001). Pocket hematoma was more common among those receiving ICDs than PPMs (18.5% vs 5.7%, respectively; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS Continuing chronic OAC increased pocket hematoma formation but most were clinically insignificant. Pocket hematoma occurred irrespective of the oral anticoagulant drug used, but additional study is needed to determine comparative risks among the drugs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brittany L Melton
- Assistant Professor, Department of Pharmacy Practice, University of Kansas School of Pharmacy , Lawrence, Kansas
| | - Patricia A Howard
- Professor and Vice Chair, Department of Pharmacy Practice, University of Kansas Medical Center , Kansas City, Kansas
| | - Abby Goerdt
- Clinical Pharmacist, University of Kansas Hospital , Kansas City, Kansas
| | - Jessica Casey
- Clinical Pharmacist, University of Kansas Hospital , Kansas City, Kansas
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Atreya AR, Cook JR, Lindenauer PK. Complications arising from cardiac implantable electrophysiological devices: review of epidemiology, pathogenesis and prevention for the clinician. Postgrad Med 2016; 128:223-30. [DOI: 10.1080/00325481.2016.1151327] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
|
42
|
Fanourgiakis J, Simantirakis E, Maniadakis N, Kanoupakis E, Chrysostomakis S, Kourlaba G, Chlouverakis G, Vardas P. Complications Related to Cardiac Rhythm Management Device Therapy and Their Financial Implication: A Prospective Single-Center TwoYear Survey. Hellenic J Cardiol 2016; 57:33-8. [PMID: 26856199 DOI: 10.1016/s1109-9666(16)30016-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Cardiac rhythm management devices (CRMDs) have proven their clinical effectiveness for patients with heart rhythm disorders. Little is known about safety and complication rates during the implantation of these devices. This study demonstrated the complication rates related to CRMD implantation, and estimated the additional hospital stay and cost associated with the management of complications. METHODS During a period of one year, a total of 464 consecutive recipients underwent CRMD implantation and were followed for 2 years. Finally, data were analyzed for 398 patients who completed the two-year follow up, resulting in a total of 796 patient-years. RESULTS Of the 201 patients with initial pacemaker (PM) implantations, 6 (2.99%) had seven complications (5 patients had lead dislodgement, 1 of them twice), and 1 patient developed pocket infection. Of the 117 PM replacements, 1 (0.85%) patient developed a complication (pocket erosion). Two patients with complications (1 with an initial PM and 1 with a replacement) died before completing the follow up for reasons unrelated to cardiac causes. There were no complications in either initial implantations (69 patients) or replacements (11 patients) of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators. The average prolongation of the hospital stay was 7 days, ranging from 1 to 35 days, resulting in 17,411 of total additional direct hospital costs. CONCLUSION This study found relatively low rates of complications in patients undergoing CRMD implantation, initial or replacement, in our center, compared with other studies. The additional hospitalization days and costs attributable to these complications depend on the nature of the complication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John Fanourgiakis
- Department of Cardiology, Heraklion University Hospital, Crete, Greece
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Kirkfeldt RE, Johansen JB, Nielsen JC. Management of Cardiac Electronic Device Infections: Challenges and Outcomes. Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev 2016; 5:183-187. [PMID: 28116083 DOI: 10.15420/aer.2016:21:2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infection is an increasing problem. Reasons for this are uncertain, but likely relate to an increasing proportion of implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) and cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) devices implanted, as well as implantations in 'higher risk' candidates, i.e. patients with heart failure, diabetes and renal failure. Challenges within the field of CIED infections are multiple with prevention being the most important challenge. Careful prescription of CIED treatment and careful patient preparation before implantation is important. Diagnosis is often difficult and delayed by subtle signs of infection. Treatment of CIED infection includes complete system removal in centres experienced in CIED extraction and prolonged antibiotic therapy. Meticulous planning and preparation before system extraction and later CIED re-implantation is essential for better patient outcome. Future strategies for reducing CIED infection should be tested in sufficiently powered, multicentre, randomised controlled trials.
Collapse
|
44
|
Sinha SK, Varm CM, Thakur R, Krishna V, Goel A, Kumar A, Jha MJ, Mishra V, Singh Syal K. An Unconventional Route of Left Ventricular Pacing. Cardiol Res 2015; 6:324-328. [PMID: 28197251 PMCID: PMC5295572 DOI: 10.14740/cr423w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/24/2015] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
We present a case of a rare complication of transvenous right ventricular pacing by temporary pacing wire causing iatrogenic interventricular septal perforation and left ventricular pacing in a 69-year-old man who was referred for recurrent syncope with sinus arrest.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Santosh Kumar Sinha
- Department of Cardiology, LPS Institute of Cardiology, G.S.V.M. Medical College, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh, 208002, India
| | - Chandra Mohan Varm
- Department of Cardiology, LPS Institute of Cardiology, G.S.V.M. Medical College, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh, 208002, India
| | - Ramesh Thakur
- Department of Cardiology, LPS Institute of Cardiology, G.S.V.M. Medical College, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh, 208002, India
| | - Vinay Krishna
- Department of Cardiology, LPS Institute of Cardiology, G.S.V.M. Medical College, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh, 208002, India
| | - Amit Goel
- Department of Cardiology, LPS Institute of Cardiology, G.S.V.M. Medical College, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh, 208002, India
| | - Ashutosh Kumar
- Department of Cardiology, LPS Institute of Cardiology, G.S.V.M. Medical College, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh, 208002, India
| | - Mukesh Jitendra Jha
- Department of Cardiology, LPS Institute of Cardiology, G.S.V.M. Medical College, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh, 208002, India
| | - Vikas Mishra
- Department of Cardiology, LPS Institute of Cardiology, G.S.V.M. Medical College, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh, 208002, India
| | - Karandeep Singh Syal
- Department of Cardiology, LPS Institute of Cardiology, G.S.V.M. Medical College, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh, 208002, India
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Reddy VY, Exner DV, Cantillon DJ, Doshi R, Bunch TJ, Tomassoni GF, Friedman PA, Estes NAM, Ip J, Niazi I, Plunkitt K, Banker R, Porterfield J, Ip JE, Dukkipati SR. Percutaneous Implantation of an Entirely Intracardiac Leadless Pacemaker. N Engl J Med 2015; 373:1125-35. [PMID: 26321198 DOI: 10.1056/nejmoa1507192] [Citation(s) in RCA: 328] [Impact Index Per Article: 36.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cardiac pacemakers are limited by device-related complications, notably infection and problems related to pacemaker leads. We studied a miniaturized, fully self-contained leadless pacemaker that is nonsurgically implanted in the right ventricle with the use of a catheter. METHODS In this multicenter study, we implanted an active-fixation leadless cardiac pacemaker in patients who required permanent single-chamber ventricular pacing. The primary efficacy end point was both an acceptable pacing threshold (≤2.0 V at 0.4 msec) and an acceptable sensing amplitude (R wave ≥5.0 mV, or a value equal to or greater than the value at implantation) through 6 months. The primary safety end point was freedom from device-related serious adverse events through 6 months. In this ongoing study, the prespecified analysis of the primary end points was performed on data from the first 300 patients who completed 6 months of follow-up (primary cohort). The rates of the efficacy end point and safety end point were compared with performance goals (based on historical data) of 85% and 86%, respectively. Additional outcomes were assessed in all 526 patients who were enrolled as of June 2015 (the total cohort). RESULTS The leadless pacemaker was successfully implanted in 504 of the 526 patients in the total cohort (95.8%). The intention-to-treat primary efficacy end point was met in 270 of the 300 patients in the primary cohort (90.0%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 86.0 to 93.2, P=0.007), and the primary safety end point was met in 280 of the 300 patients (93.3%; 95% CI, 89.9 to 95.9; P<0.001). At 6 months, device-related serious adverse events were observed in 6.7% of the patients; events included device dislodgement with percutaneous retrieval (in 1.7%), cardiac perforation (in 1.3%), and pacing-threshold elevation requiring percutaneous retrieval and device replacement (in 1.3%). CONCLUSIONS The leadless cardiac pacemaker met prespecified pacing and sensing requirements in the large majority of patients. Device-related serious adverse events occurred in approximately 1 in 15 patients. (Funded by St. Jude Medical; LEADLESS II ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02030418.).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vivek Y Reddy
- From the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (V.Y.R., S.R.D.) and Weill Cornell Medical Center (J.E.I.) - both in New York; Libin Cardiovascular Institute of Alberta, Calgary, Canada (D.V.E.); Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland (D.J.C.); Keck Hospital of University of Southern California, Los Angeles (R.D.), and Premier Cardiology, Newport Beach (R.B.) - both in California; Intermountain Medical Center Heart Institute, Salt Lake City, (T.J.B.); Central Baptist Hospital, Lexington, KY (G.F.T.); Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (P.A.F.); Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston (N.A.M.E.); Sparrow Clinical Research Institute, Lansing, MI (J.I.); Aurora Medical Group, Milwaukee (I.N.); Naples Community Hospital, Naples, FL (K.P.); and Methodist University Hospital, Memphis, TN (J.P.)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Kotsakou M, Kioumis I, Lazaridis G, Pitsiou G, Lampaki S, Papaiwannou A, Karavergou A, Tsakiridis K, Katsikogiannis N, Karapantzos I, Karapantzou C, Baka S, Mpoukovinas I, Karavasilis V, Rapti A, Trakada G, Zissimopoulos A, Zarogoulidis K, Zarogoulidis P. Pacemaker insertion. ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE 2015; 3:42. [PMID: 25815303 DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2305-5839.2015.02.06] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2015] [Accepted: 01/28/2015] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
A pacemaker (PM) (or artificial PM, so as not to be confused with the heart's natural PM) is a medical device that uses electrical impulses, delivered by electrodes contracting the heart muscles, to regulate the beating of the heart. The primary purpose of this device is to maintain an adequate heart rate, either because the heart's natural PM is not fast enough, or there is a block in the heart's electrical conduction system. Modern PMs are externally programmable and allow the cardiologist to select the optimum pacing modes for individual patients. Some combine a PM and defibrillator in a single implantable device. PMs can be temporary or permanent. Temporary PMs are used to treat short-term heart problems, such as a slow heartbeat that's caused by a heart attack, heart surgery, or an overdose of medicine. Permanent PMs are used to control long-term heart rhythm problems. A PM can relieve some arrhythmia symptoms, such as fatigue and fainting. A PM also can help a person who has abnormal HRs resume a more active lifestyle. In the current mini review we will focus on the insertion of a PM and the possible pneumothorax that can be caused.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Kotsakou
- 1 Electrophysiology Department, "Saint Luke" Private Clinic, Thessaloniki, Panorama, Greece ; 2 Pulmonary-Oncology, "G. Papanikolaou" General Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 3 Oncology Department, "Papageorgiou" General Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 4 Thoracic Surgery Department, "Saint Luke" Private Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 5 Surgery Department, University General Hospital of Alexandroupolis, Alexandroupolis, Greece ; 6 Ear, Nose and Throat, "Saint Luke" Private Hospital, Panorama, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 7 Oncology Department, "Interbalkan" European Medical Center, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 8 Oncology Department, "BioMedicine" Private Clinic, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 9 2nd Pulmonary Clinic of "Sotiria" Hospital, Athens, Greece ; 10 Pulmonary Laboratory, Alexandra Hospital University, Athens, Greece ; 11 Nuclear Medicine Department, University General Hospital of Alexandroupolis, Democritus University of Thrace, Greece
| | - Ioannis Kioumis
- 1 Electrophysiology Department, "Saint Luke" Private Clinic, Thessaloniki, Panorama, Greece ; 2 Pulmonary-Oncology, "G. Papanikolaou" General Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 3 Oncology Department, "Papageorgiou" General Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 4 Thoracic Surgery Department, "Saint Luke" Private Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 5 Surgery Department, University General Hospital of Alexandroupolis, Alexandroupolis, Greece ; 6 Ear, Nose and Throat, "Saint Luke" Private Hospital, Panorama, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 7 Oncology Department, "Interbalkan" European Medical Center, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 8 Oncology Department, "BioMedicine" Private Clinic, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 9 2nd Pulmonary Clinic of "Sotiria" Hospital, Athens, Greece ; 10 Pulmonary Laboratory, Alexandra Hospital University, Athens, Greece ; 11 Nuclear Medicine Department, University General Hospital of Alexandroupolis, Democritus University of Thrace, Greece
| | - George Lazaridis
- 1 Electrophysiology Department, "Saint Luke" Private Clinic, Thessaloniki, Panorama, Greece ; 2 Pulmonary-Oncology, "G. Papanikolaou" General Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 3 Oncology Department, "Papageorgiou" General Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 4 Thoracic Surgery Department, "Saint Luke" Private Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 5 Surgery Department, University General Hospital of Alexandroupolis, Alexandroupolis, Greece ; 6 Ear, Nose and Throat, "Saint Luke" Private Hospital, Panorama, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 7 Oncology Department, "Interbalkan" European Medical Center, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 8 Oncology Department, "BioMedicine" Private Clinic, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 9 2nd Pulmonary Clinic of "Sotiria" Hospital, Athens, Greece ; 10 Pulmonary Laboratory, Alexandra Hospital University, Athens, Greece ; 11 Nuclear Medicine Department, University General Hospital of Alexandroupolis, Democritus University of Thrace, Greece
| | - Georgia Pitsiou
- 1 Electrophysiology Department, "Saint Luke" Private Clinic, Thessaloniki, Panorama, Greece ; 2 Pulmonary-Oncology, "G. Papanikolaou" General Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 3 Oncology Department, "Papageorgiou" General Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 4 Thoracic Surgery Department, "Saint Luke" Private Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 5 Surgery Department, University General Hospital of Alexandroupolis, Alexandroupolis, Greece ; 6 Ear, Nose and Throat, "Saint Luke" Private Hospital, Panorama, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 7 Oncology Department, "Interbalkan" European Medical Center, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 8 Oncology Department, "BioMedicine" Private Clinic, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 9 2nd Pulmonary Clinic of "Sotiria" Hospital, Athens, Greece ; 10 Pulmonary Laboratory, Alexandra Hospital University, Athens, Greece ; 11 Nuclear Medicine Department, University General Hospital of Alexandroupolis, Democritus University of Thrace, Greece
| | - Sofia Lampaki
- 1 Electrophysiology Department, "Saint Luke" Private Clinic, Thessaloniki, Panorama, Greece ; 2 Pulmonary-Oncology, "G. Papanikolaou" General Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 3 Oncology Department, "Papageorgiou" General Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 4 Thoracic Surgery Department, "Saint Luke" Private Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 5 Surgery Department, University General Hospital of Alexandroupolis, Alexandroupolis, Greece ; 6 Ear, Nose and Throat, "Saint Luke" Private Hospital, Panorama, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 7 Oncology Department, "Interbalkan" European Medical Center, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 8 Oncology Department, "BioMedicine" Private Clinic, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 9 2nd Pulmonary Clinic of "Sotiria" Hospital, Athens, Greece ; 10 Pulmonary Laboratory, Alexandra Hospital University, Athens, Greece ; 11 Nuclear Medicine Department, University General Hospital of Alexandroupolis, Democritus University of Thrace, Greece
| | - Antonis Papaiwannou
- 1 Electrophysiology Department, "Saint Luke" Private Clinic, Thessaloniki, Panorama, Greece ; 2 Pulmonary-Oncology, "G. Papanikolaou" General Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 3 Oncology Department, "Papageorgiou" General Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 4 Thoracic Surgery Department, "Saint Luke" Private Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 5 Surgery Department, University General Hospital of Alexandroupolis, Alexandroupolis, Greece ; 6 Ear, Nose and Throat, "Saint Luke" Private Hospital, Panorama, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 7 Oncology Department, "Interbalkan" European Medical Center, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 8 Oncology Department, "BioMedicine" Private Clinic, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 9 2nd Pulmonary Clinic of "Sotiria" Hospital, Athens, Greece ; 10 Pulmonary Laboratory, Alexandra Hospital University, Athens, Greece ; 11 Nuclear Medicine Department, University General Hospital of Alexandroupolis, Democritus University of Thrace, Greece
| | - Anastasia Karavergou
- 1 Electrophysiology Department, "Saint Luke" Private Clinic, Thessaloniki, Panorama, Greece ; 2 Pulmonary-Oncology, "G. Papanikolaou" General Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 3 Oncology Department, "Papageorgiou" General Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 4 Thoracic Surgery Department, "Saint Luke" Private Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 5 Surgery Department, University General Hospital of Alexandroupolis, Alexandroupolis, Greece ; 6 Ear, Nose and Throat, "Saint Luke" Private Hospital, Panorama, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 7 Oncology Department, "Interbalkan" European Medical Center, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 8 Oncology Department, "BioMedicine" Private Clinic, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 9 2nd Pulmonary Clinic of "Sotiria" Hospital, Athens, Greece ; 10 Pulmonary Laboratory, Alexandra Hospital University, Athens, Greece ; 11 Nuclear Medicine Department, University General Hospital of Alexandroupolis, Democritus University of Thrace, Greece
| | - Kosmas Tsakiridis
- 1 Electrophysiology Department, "Saint Luke" Private Clinic, Thessaloniki, Panorama, Greece ; 2 Pulmonary-Oncology, "G. Papanikolaou" General Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 3 Oncology Department, "Papageorgiou" General Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 4 Thoracic Surgery Department, "Saint Luke" Private Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 5 Surgery Department, University General Hospital of Alexandroupolis, Alexandroupolis, Greece ; 6 Ear, Nose and Throat, "Saint Luke" Private Hospital, Panorama, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 7 Oncology Department, "Interbalkan" European Medical Center, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 8 Oncology Department, "BioMedicine" Private Clinic, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 9 2nd Pulmonary Clinic of "Sotiria" Hospital, Athens, Greece ; 10 Pulmonary Laboratory, Alexandra Hospital University, Athens, Greece ; 11 Nuclear Medicine Department, University General Hospital of Alexandroupolis, Democritus University of Thrace, Greece
| | - Nikolaos Katsikogiannis
- 1 Electrophysiology Department, "Saint Luke" Private Clinic, Thessaloniki, Panorama, Greece ; 2 Pulmonary-Oncology, "G. Papanikolaou" General Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 3 Oncology Department, "Papageorgiou" General Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 4 Thoracic Surgery Department, "Saint Luke" Private Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 5 Surgery Department, University General Hospital of Alexandroupolis, Alexandroupolis, Greece ; 6 Ear, Nose and Throat, "Saint Luke" Private Hospital, Panorama, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 7 Oncology Department, "Interbalkan" European Medical Center, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 8 Oncology Department, "BioMedicine" Private Clinic, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 9 2nd Pulmonary Clinic of "Sotiria" Hospital, Athens, Greece ; 10 Pulmonary Laboratory, Alexandra Hospital University, Athens, Greece ; 11 Nuclear Medicine Department, University General Hospital of Alexandroupolis, Democritus University of Thrace, Greece
| | - Ilias Karapantzos
- 1 Electrophysiology Department, "Saint Luke" Private Clinic, Thessaloniki, Panorama, Greece ; 2 Pulmonary-Oncology, "G. Papanikolaou" General Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 3 Oncology Department, "Papageorgiou" General Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 4 Thoracic Surgery Department, "Saint Luke" Private Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 5 Surgery Department, University General Hospital of Alexandroupolis, Alexandroupolis, Greece ; 6 Ear, Nose and Throat, "Saint Luke" Private Hospital, Panorama, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 7 Oncology Department, "Interbalkan" European Medical Center, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 8 Oncology Department, "BioMedicine" Private Clinic, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 9 2nd Pulmonary Clinic of "Sotiria" Hospital, Athens, Greece ; 10 Pulmonary Laboratory, Alexandra Hospital University, Athens, Greece ; 11 Nuclear Medicine Department, University General Hospital of Alexandroupolis, Democritus University of Thrace, Greece
| | - Chrysanthi Karapantzou
- 1 Electrophysiology Department, "Saint Luke" Private Clinic, Thessaloniki, Panorama, Greece ; 2 Pulmonary-Oncology, "G. Papanikolaou" General Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 3 Oncology Department, "Papageorgiou" General Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 4 Thoracic Surgery Department, "Saint Luke" Private Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 5 Surgery Department, University General Hospital of Alexandroupolis, Alexandroupolis, Greece ; 6 Ear, Nose and Throat, "Saint Luke" Private Hospital, Panorama, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 7 Oncology Department, "Interbalkan" European Medical Center, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 8 Oncology Department, "BioMedicine" Private Clinic, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 9 2nd Pulmonary Clinic of "Sotiria" Hospital, Athens, Greece ; 10 Pulmonary Laboratory, Alexandra Hospital University, Athens, Greece ; 11 Nuclear Medicine Department, University General Hospital of Alexandroupolis, Democritus University of Thrace, Greece
| | - Sofia Baka
- 1 Electrophysiology Department, "Saint Luke" Private Clinic, Thessaloniki, Panorama, Greece ; 2 Pulmonary-Oncology, "G. Papanikolaou" General Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 3 Oncology Department, "Papageorgiou" General Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 4 Thoracic Surgery Department, "Saint Luke" Private Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 5 Surgery Department, University General Hospital of Alexandroupolis, Alexandroupolis, Greece ; 6 Ear, Nose and Throat, "Saint Luke" Private Hospital, Panorama, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 7 Oncology Department, "Interbalkan" European Medical Center, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 8 Oncology Department, "BioMedicine" Private Clinic, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 9 2nd Pulmonary Clinic of "Sotiria" Hospital, Athens, Greece ; 10 Pulmonary Laboratory, Alexandra Hospital University, Athens, Greece ; 11 Nuclear Medicine Department, University General Hospital of Alexandroupolis, Democritus University of Thrace, Greece
| | - Ioannis Mpoukovinas
- 1 Electrophysiology Department, "Saint Luke" Private Clinic, Thessaloniki, Panorama, Greece ; 2 Pulmonary-Oncology, "G. Papanikolaou" General Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 3 Oncology Department, "Papageorgiou" General Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 4 Thoracic Surgery Department, "Saint Luke" Private Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 5 Surgery Department, University General Hospital of Alexandroupolis, Alexandroupolis, Greece ; 6 Ear, Nose and Throat, "Saint Luke" Private Hospital, Panorama, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 7 Oncology Department, "Interbalkan" European Medical Center, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 8 Oncology Department, "BioMedicine" Private Clinic, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 9 2nd Pulmonary Clinic of "Sotiria" Hospital, Athens, Greece ; 10 Pulmonary Laboratory, Alexandra Hospital University, Athens, Greece ; 11 Nuclear Medicine Department, University General Hospital of Alexandroupolis, Democritus University of Thrace, Greece
| | - Vasilis Karavasilis
- 1 Electrophysiology Department, "Saint Luke" Private Clinic, Thessaloniki, Panorama, Greece ; 2 Pulmonary-Oncology, "G. Papanikolaou" General Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 3 Oncology Department, "Papageorgiou" General Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 4 Thoracic Surgery Department, "Saint Luke" Private Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 5 Surgery Department, University General Hospital of Alexandroupolis, Alexandroupolis, Greece ; 6 Ear, Nose and Throat, "Saint Luke" Private Hospital, Panorama, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 7 Oncology Department, "Interbalkan" European Medical Center, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 8 Oncology Department, "BioMedicine" Private Clinic, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 9 2nd Pulmonary Clinic of "Sotiria" Hospital, Athens, Greece ; 10 Pulmonary Laboratory, Alexandra Hospital University, Athens, Greece ; 11 Nuclear Medicine Department, University General Hospital of Alexandroupolis, Democritus University of Thrace, Greece
| | - Aggeliki Rapti
- 1 Electrophysiology Department, "Saint Luke" Private Clinic, Thessaloniki, Panorama, Greece ; 2 Pulmonary-Oncology, "G. Papanikolaou" General Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 3 Oncology Department, "Papageorgiou" General Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 4 Thoracic Surgery Department, "Saint Luke" Private Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 5 Surgery Department, University General Hospital of Alexandroupolis, Alexandroupolis, Greece ; 6 Ear, Nose and Throat, "Saint Luke" Private Hospital, Panorama, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 7 Oncology Department, "Interbalkan" European Medical Center, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 8 Oncology Department, "BioMedicine" Private Clinic, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 9 2nd Pulmonary Clinic of "Sotiria" Hospital, Athens, Greece ; 10 Pulmonary Laboratory, Alexandra Hospital University, Athens, Greece ; 11 Nuclear Medicine Department, University General Hospital of Alexandroupolis, Democritus University of Thrace, Greece
| | - Georgia Trakada
- 1 Electrophysiology Department, "Saint Luke" Private Clinic, Thessaloniki, Panorama, Greece ; 2 Pulmonary-Oncology, "G. Papanikolaou" General Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 3 Oncology Department, "Papageorgiou" General Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 4 Thoracic Surgery Department, "Saint Luke" Private Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 5 Surgery Department, University General Hospital of Alexandroupolis, Alexandroupolis, Greece ; 6 Ear, Nose and Throat, "Saint Luke" Private Hospital, Panorama, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 7 Oncology Department, "Interbalkan" European Medical Center, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 8 Oncology Department, "BioMedicine" Private Clinic, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 9 2nd Pulmonary Clinic of "Sotiria" Hospital, Athens, Greece ; 10 Pulmonary Laboratory, Alexandra Hospital University, Athens, Greece ; 11 Nuclear Medicine Department, University General Hospital of Alexandroupolis, Democritus University of Thrace, Greece
| | - Athanasios Zissimopoulos
- 1 Electrophysiology Department, "Saint Luke" Private Clinic, Thessaloniki, Panorama, Greece ; 2 Pulmonary-Oncology, "G. Papanikolaou" General Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 3 Oncology Department, "Papageorgiou" General Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 4 Thoracic Surgery Department, "Saint Luke" Private Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 5 Surgery Department, University General Hospital of Alexandroupolis, Alexandroupolis, Greece ; 6 Ear, Nose and Throat, "Saint Luke" Private Hospital, Panorama, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 7 Oncology Department, "Interbalkan" European Medical Center, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 8 Oncology Department, "BioMedicine" Private Clinic, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 9 2nd Pulmonary Clinic of "Sotiria" Hospital, Athens, Greece ; 10 Pulmonary Laboratory, Alexandra Hospital University, Athens, Greece ; 11 Nuclear Medicine Department, University General Hospital of Alexandroupolis, Democritus University of Thrace, Greece
| | - Konstantinos Zarogoulidis
- 1 Electrophysiology Department, "Saint Luke" Private Clinic, Thessaloniki, Panorama, Greece ; 2 Pulmonary-Oncology, "G. Papanikolaou" General Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 3 Oncology Department, "Papageorgiou" General Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 4 Thoracic Surgery Department, "Saint Luke" Private Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 5 Surgery Department, University General Hospital of Alexandroupolis, Alexandroupolis, Greece ; 6 Ear, Nose and Throat, "Saint Luke" Private Hospital, Panorama, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 7 Oncology Department, "Interbalkan" European Medical Center, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 8 Oncology Department, "BioMedicine" Private Clinic, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 9 2nd Pulmonary Clinic of "Sotiria" Hospital, Athens, Greece ; 10 Pulmonary Laboratory, Alexandra Hospital University, Athens, Greece ; 11 Nuclear Medicine Department, University General Hospital of Alexandroupolis, Democritus University of Thrace, Greece
| | - Paul Zarogoulidis
- 1 Electrophysiology Department, "Saint Luke" Private Clinic, Thessaloniki, Panorama, Greece ; 2 Pulmonary-Oncology, "G. Papanikolaou" General Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 3 Oncology Department, "Papageorgiou" General Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 4 Thoracic Surgery Department, "Saint Luke" Private Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 5 Surgery Department, University General Hospital of Alexandroupolis, Alexandroupolis, Greece ; 6 Ear, Nose and Throat, "Saint Luke" Private Hospital, Panorama, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 7 Oncology Department, "Interbalkan" European Medical Center, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 8 Oncology Department, "BioMedicine" Private Clinic, Thessaloniki, Greece ; 9 2nd Pulmonary Clinic of "Sotiria" Hospital, Athens, Greece ; 10 Pulmonary Laboratory, Alexandra Hospital University, Athens, Greece ; 11 Nuclear Medicine Department, University General Hospital of Alexandroupolis, Democritus University of Thrace, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
HUSSAIN SARAHK, EDDY MEGHANM, MOORMAN LIZA, MALHOTRA ROHIT, DARBY ANDREWE, BILCHICK KENNETH, MASON PAMELA, MANGRUM MICHAELJ, DIMARCO JOHNP, FERGUSON JOHND. Major Complications and Mortality Within 30 Days of an Electrophysiological Procedure at an Academic Medical Center: Implications for Developing National Standards. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2015; 26:527-31. [DOI: 10.1111/jce.12639] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2014] [Revised: 01/21/2015] [Accepted: 02/09/2015] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- SARAH K. HUSSAIN
- Penn State Hershey Heart and Vascular Institute, Section of Electrophysiology; Penn State Hershey Medical Center; Hershey Pennsylvania USA
| | - MEGHAN M. EDDY
- Division of Cardiology, Section of Electrophysiology; The University of Virginia; Charlottesville Virginia USA
| | - LIZA MOORMAN
- Division of Cardiology, Section of Electrophysiology; The University of Virginia; Charlottesville Virginia USA
| | - ROHIT MALHOTRA
- Division of Cardiology, Section of Electrophysiology; The University of Virginia; Charlottesville Virginia USA
| | - ANDREW E. DARBY
- Division of Cardiology, Section of Electrophysiology; The University of Virginia; Charlottesville Virginia USA
| | - KENNETH BILCHICK
- Division of Cardiology, Section of Electrophysiology; The University of Virginia; Charlottesville Virginia USA
| | - PAMELA MASON
- Division of Cardiology, Section of Electrophysiology; The University of Virginia; Charlottesville Virginia USA
| | - MICHAEL J. MANGRUM
- Division of Cardiology, Section of Electrophysiology; The University of Virginia; Charlottesville Virginia USA
| | - JOHN P. DIMARCO
- Division of Cardiology, Section of Electrophysiology; The University of Virginia; Charlottesville Virginia USA
| | - JOHN D. FERGUSON
- Division of Cardiology, Section of Electrophysiology; The University of Virginia; Charlottesville Virginia USA
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Lin YS, Hung SP, Chen PR, Yang CH, Wo HT, Chang PC, Wang CC, Chou CC, Wen MS, Chung CM, Chen TH. Risk factors influencing complications of cardiac implantable electronic device implantation: infection, pneumothorax and heart perforation: a nationwide population-based cohort study. Medicine (Baltimore) 2014; 93:e213. [PMID: 25501080 PMCID: PMC4602772 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000000213] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
As the number of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) is increasing annually, CIED-related complications are becoming increasingly important. The aim of the study was to assess the risks associated with CIEDs by a nationwide database. Patients were selected from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Database. Admissions for CIED implantation, replacement, and revision were evaluated and the evaluation period was 14 years. Endpoints included CIED-related infection, pneumothorax, and heart perforation. The study included 40,608 patients with a mean age of 71.8 ± 13.3 years. Regarding infection, the incidence rate was 2.45 per 1000 CIED-years. Male gender, younger age, device replacement, and previous infection were risks for infection while old age and high-volume centers (>200 per year) were protectors. The incidence of pneumothorax was 0.6%, with an increased risk in individuals who had chronic obstructive lung disease (COPD) and cardiac resynchronized therapy (CRT). The incidence of heart perforation was 0.09%, with an increased risk in individuals who had pre-operation temporal pacing and steroid use. High-volume center was found to decrease infection rate while male gender, young people, and individuals who underwent replacements were associated with an increased risk of infection. Additionally, pre-operation temporal pacing and steroid use should be avoided if possible. Furthermore, COPD patients or those who accept CRTs should be monitored closely.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu-Sheng Lin
- From the Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chiayi, Taiwan (YSL, CMC); Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taoyuan, Taiwan (SPH, PRC); Division of Cardiology, Chang-Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, Taiwan (CHY, HTW, PCC, CCW, CCC, MSW, THC); Department of Cardiology, Chang-Gung Memorial Hospital, Xiamen, China (THC); and Graduate Institute of Clinical Medical Sciences, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University (YSL)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Reddy VY, Knops RE, Sperzel J, Miller MA, Petru J, Simon J, Sediva L, de Groot JR, Tjong FVY, Jacobson P, Ostrosff A, Dukkipati SR, Koruth JS, Wilde AAM, Kautzner J, Neuzil P. Permanent leadless cardiac pacing: results of the LEADLESS trial. Circulation 2014; 129:1466-71. [PMID: 24664277 DOI: 10.1161/circulationaha.113.006987] [Citation(s) in RCA: 198] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Conventional cardiac pacemakers are associated with several potential short- and long-term complications related to either the transvenous lead or subcutaneous pulse generator. We tested the safety and clinical performance of a novel, completely self-contained leadless cardiac pacemaker. METHODS AND RESULTS The primary safety end point was freedom from complications at 90 days. Secondary performance end points included implant success rate, implant time, and measures of device performance (pacing/sensing thresholds and rate-responsive performance). The mean age of the patient cohort (n=33) was 77±8 years, and 67% of the patients were male (n=22/33). The most common indication for cardiac pacing was permanent atrial fibrillation with atrioventricular block (n=22, 67%). The implant success rate was 97% (n=32). Five patients (15%) required the use of >1 leadless cardiac pacemaker during the procedure. One patient developed right ventricular perforation and cardiac tamponade during the implant procedure, and eventually died as the result of a stroke. The overall complication-free rate was 94% (31/33). After 3 months of follow-up, the measures of pacing performance (sensing, impedance, and pacing threshold) either improved or were stable within the accepted range. CONCLUSIONS In a prospective nonrandomized study, a completely self-contained, single-chamber leadless cardiac pacemaker has shown to be safe and feasible. The absence of a transvenous lead and subcutaneous pulse generator could represent a paradigm shift in cardiac pacing. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION URL http://clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01700244.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vivek Y Reddy
- Helmsley Electrophysiology Center, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY (V.Y.R., M.A.M., S.R.D., J.S.K.); Department of Cardiology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands (R.E.K., J.R.d.G., A.A.M.W.); Kerckhoff Heart and Thorax Center, Bad Nauheim, Germany (J.S.); Cardiology Department, Homolka Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic (J.P., J.S., L.S., P.N.); Nanostim, Inc, Sunnyvale, CA (P.J., A.O.); Department of Cardiology, Institute of Clinical and Experimental Medicine - IKEM, Prague, Czech Republic (J.K.)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Enteral albuterol decreases the need for chronotropic agents in patients with cervical spinal cord injury–induced bradycardia. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2014; 76:297-301; discussion 301-2. [DOI: 10.1097/ta.0000000000000118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
|