The economic and quality-of-life impact of symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux disease

The Clinical Spectrum of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: Facts and Fictions

<b><i>Background:</i></b> This review addresses the intricate spectrum of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), a condition affecting 10–30% of the Western population. GERD is characterized by the backflow of gastric contents into the esophagus, causing typical and atypical symptoms. Its pathophysiology involves various factors such as hiatal hernia, esophageal motor disorders, and dietary triggers. The review explores the complexities of GERD spectrum, including nonerosive reflux disease (NERD), reflux hypersensitivity (RH), and functional heartburn (FH). <b><i>Summary:</i></b> The diagnostic process for GERD, based on the Lyon Consensus 2.0 criteria, encompasses clinical evaluation, endoscopy, and functional tests, including pH-impedance and wireless-pH monitoring. NERD, a significant subset of GERD, is defined by reflux symptoms and abnormal reflux burden without mucosal damage. RH, classified under functional esophageal disorders by Rome IV criteria, presents with typical esophageal symptoms associated with reflux but lacks of structural, inflammatory, or motor causes. FH is identified by heartburn with normal endoscopy, reflux testing, and esophageal manometry results. The management of RH and FH, focusing on reducing esophageal hypersensitivity, varies from standard GERD treatments. <b><i>Key Messages:</i></b> The review emphasizes the necessity of personalized treatment strategies due to the complexity and overlap of GERD subtypes. It highlights the importance of a multidisciplinary approach, involving gastroenterologists, psychologists, and other specialists, to improve patient outcomes and quality of life. The article underscores that understanding the distinctions and overlaps among NERD, RH, and FH is crucial for effective management, and the need for innovative approaches in diagnosis and treatment to address the unique challenges of each subtype.

The Role of a Plant-Only (Vegan) Diet in Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: Online Survey of the Italian General Population

The relationship between food and the pathophysiological mechanisms of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is unclear. There are few data on the impact of dietary habits on GERD symptoms and on the incidence of GERD in subjects undergoing plant-based diets. In this study, we investigated the association between diet and GERD, using data collected through an online survey of the Italian general population. In total, 1077 subjects participated in the study. GERD was defined according to the Montreal Consensus. For all subjects age, gender, body mass index (BMI), marital status, education, occupation, alcohol consumption, and smoking habits were recorded. All participants also completed the SF-36 questionnaire on Quality of Life. A total of 402 subjects (37.3%) were vegans and 675 (62.7%) non-vegans. The prevalence of GERD in the total population was 9%. Subjects with GERD-related symptoms recorded a worse quality of life according to SF-36 analysis (p < 0.05 for all dimensions). In multivariate analysis, after adjusting for confounders, participants undergoing a vegan diet had a significantly lower risk of GERD (OR = 0.47, 95% CI 0.28-0.81, p = 0.006). These findings should be taken into account to inform the lifestyle management of GERD.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease: new approaches to optimizing pharmacotherapy

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are baseline drugs for induction and maintenance of remission in gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). PPIs have proven to be highly effective in healing esophageal mucosal lesions and relieving the symptoms of the disease in most cases. However, according to the literature data, the incidence rate of clinical ineffectiveness of PPIs in the form of partial or complete persistence of current symptoms during administration of standard doses of PPIs ranges from 10 to 40%. Optimization of GERD therapy in PPI refractory patients is a significant challenge. In most cases, experts advise to increase a dose / dosage frequency of PPIs, switch to CYP2C19-independent PPIs (rabeprazole, esomeprazole, dexlansoprazole), add an esophagoprotective or promotility agents to therapy. At the same time, these recommendations have a limited effect in some patients, which opens up opportunities for looking for new solutions related to the optimization of GERD therapy. Today there is growing evidence of the relevance of the role of disruption of the cytoprotective and barrier properties of the esophageal mucosa in the genesis of GERD and the formation of refractoriness. Intercellular contacts ensure the integrity of the barrier function of the esophageal mucosa to protect it from various exogenous intraluminal substances with detergent properties. Acid-peptic attack in patients with GERD leads to alteration of the expression of some tight junction proteins in epithelial cells of the esophageal mucosa. The latter leads to increased mucosal permeability, which facilitates the penetration of hydrogen ions and other substances into the submucosal layer, where they stimulate the terminals of nerve fibers playing a role in the induction and persistence of the symptoms of the disease. The above evidence brought up to date the effectiveness study of the cytoprotective drugs with tropism to the gastrointestinal tract, as part of the combination therapy of GERD.

Global Prevalence and Risk Factors of Gastro-oesophageal Reflux Disease (GORD): Systematic Review with Meta-analysis

Although gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) is a common medical complaint, there is currently no consensus on the global prevalence of GORD. The aim of this study was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis on GORD prevalence and risk factors at a global level. MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Scopus, Cochrane library, and Google Scholar were systematically searched, without language restrictions, for studies on the prevalence and risk factors of GORD. Data were pooled using a random effects model (95% confidence interval), and the odds ratio and relative risk for each risk factor were calculated. Out of 34,355 search results, 96 records reporting the results from 102 studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria, representing 37 countries and all regions of the UN geoscheme. The global pooled prevalence of GORD was 13.98% and varied greatly according to region (12.88% in Latin America and the Caribbean to 19.55% in North America) and country (4.16% in China to 22.40% in Turkey). Using the United Nations 2017 Revision of World Population Prospects, the estimated number of individuals suffering from GORD globally is 1.03 billion. Multiple risk factors associated with a significant increase in the risk of GORD were also identified. This systematic review and meta-analysis revealed that although a substantial proportion (13.98%) of the global population suffers from GORD, there are significant variations between regions and countries. Risk factors for GORD were also identified which may allow clinicians to recognise individuals most at risk.

Prevalence of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease and Proton Pump Inhibitor-Refractory Symptoms

BACKGROUND & AIMS

There are few data on the prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in the United States. We performed a population-based study to determine the prevalence of GERD symptoms and persistent GERD symptoms despite use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs).

METHODS

We conducted the National Gastrointestinal Survey in 2015 using MyGiHealth, an app that guides participants through National Institutes of Health gastrointestinal Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System surveys. Primary outcomes were prevalence of GERD symptoms in the past and persistence of GERD symptoms (heartburn or regurgitation 2 or more days in past week) among participants taking PPIs. Population weights were applied to the data and multivariable regression was used to adjust for confounding.

RESULTS

Among 71,812 participants, 32,878 (44.1%) reported having had GERD symptoms in the past and 23,039 (30.9%) reported having GERD symptoms in the past week. We also found that 35.1% of those who had experienced GERD symptoms were currently on therapy (55.2% on PPIs, 24.3% on histamine-2 receptor blockers, and 24.4% on antacids). Among 3229 participants taking daily PPIs, 54.1% had persistent GERD symptoms. Younger individuals, women, Latino individuals, and participants with irritable bowel syndrome or Crohn's disease were more likely to have continued symptoms, even when taking PPIs.

CONCLUSIONS

Using a population-based survey, we found GERD symptoms to be common: 2 of 5 participants have had GERD symptoms in the past and 1 of 3 had symptoms in the past week. We also found that half of PPI users have persistent symptoms. Given the significant effect of GERD on quality of life, further research and development of new therapies are needed for patients with PPI-refractory GERD symptoms.

Barrett oesophagus

Barrett oesophagus (BE), the only known histological precursor of oesophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC), is a condition in which the squamous epithelium of the oesophagus is replaced by columnar epithelium as an adaptive response to gastro-oesophageal reflux. EAC has one of the fastest rising incidences of cancers in Western countries and has a dismal prognosis. BE is usually detected during endoscopic examination, and diagnosis is confirmed by the histological presence of intestinal metaplasia. Advances in genomics and transcriptomics have improved our understanding of the pathogenesis and malignant progression of intestinal metaplasia. As the majority of EAC cases are diagnosed in individuals without a known history of BE, screening for BE could potentially decrease disease-related mortality. Owing to the pre-malignant nature of BE, endoscopic surveillance of patients with BE is imperative for early detection and treatment of dysplasia to prevent further progression to invasive EAC. Developments in endoscopic therapy have resulted in a major shift in the treatment of patients with BE who have dysplasia or early EAC, from surgical resection to endoscopic resection and ablation. In addition to symptom control by optimization of lifestyle and pharmacological therapy with proton pump inhibitors, chemopreventive strategies based on NSAIDs and statins are currently being investigated for BE management.

Comparison of the early effects of vonoprazan, lansoprazole and famotidine on intragastric pH: a three-way crossover study

To promote symptom relief from acid-related diseases, a medicine with a rapid-onset effect is ideal. The aim of this study was to investigate the early inhibitory effect on gastric acid secretion after a single oral administration of vonoprazan, which represents a new class of proton pump inhibitors, and to compare this effect with those of lansoprazole and famotidine. Ten Helicobacter pylori (HP)-negative male subjects participated in this randomized, three-way crossover study. A single oral administration of vonoprazan (20 mg), lansoprazole (30 mg) or famotidine (20 mg) was performed, and the intragastric pH was continuously monitored for 6 h. Each drug was administered at least seven days apart. The average intragastric pH during the 6-h period after the administration of famotidine was higher than that after the administration of lansoprazole (median: 4.45 vs 2.65; p = 0.0284). A similar result was observed for vonoprazan and lansoprazole (median: 4.30 vs 2.65; p = 0.0322). In conclusions, oral administration of vonoprazan and famotidine in HP-negative healthy male subjects caused the intragastric pH to rise more quickly than did lansoprazole. (Trial Registration: UMIN000020989)

Tobacco smoking, alcohol consumption and gastro-oesophageal reflux disease

Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) develops when reflux of gastric content causes troublesome symptoms or complications. The main symptoms are heartburn and acid regurgitation and complications include oesophagitis, strictures, Barrett's oesophagus and oesophageal adenocarcinoma. In addition to hereditary influence, GORD is associated with lifestyle factors, mainly obesity. Tobacco smoking is regarded as an aetiological factor of GORD, while alcohol consumption is considered a triggering factor of reflux episodes and not a causal factor. Yet, both tobacco smoking and alcohol consumption can reduce the lower oesophageal sphincter pressure, facilitating reflux. In addition, tobacco smoking reduces the production of saliva rich in bicarbonate, which is important for buffering and clearance of acid in the oesophagus. Alcohol also has a direct noxious effect on the oesophageal mucosa, which predisposes to acidic injury. Tobacco smoking cessation reduces the risk of GORD symptoms and avoidance of alcohol is encouraged in individuals where alcohol consumption triggers reflux.

Mucosal impedance discriminates GERD from non-GERD conditions

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Current diagnostic tests for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) are suboptimal and do not accurately and reliably measure chronicity of reflux. A minimally invasive device has been developed to assess esophageal mucosal impedance (MI) as a marker of chronic reflux. We performed a prospective longitudinal study to investigate MI patterns in patients with GERD and common nonreflux conditions, to assess MI patterns before and after treatment with proton pump inhibitors and to compare the performance of MI and wireless pH tests.

METHODS

We evaluated MI in 61 patients with erosive esophagitis, 81 with nonerosive but pH-abnormal GERD, 93 without GERD, 18 with achalasia, and 15 with eosinophilic esophagitis. MI was measured at the site of esophagitis and at 2, 5, and 10 cm above the squamocolumnar junction in all participants. MI was measured before and after acid suppressive therapy, and findings were compared with those from wireless pH monitoring.

RESULTS

MI values were significantly lower in patients with GERD (erosive esophagitis or nonerosive but pH-abnormal GERD) or eosinophilic esophagitis than in patients without GERD or patients with achalasia (P < .001). The pattern of MI in patients with GERD differed from that in patients without GERD or patients with eosinophilic esophagitis; patients with GERD had low MI closer to the squamocolumnar junction, and values increased axially along the esophagus. These patterns normalized with acid suppressive therapy. MI patterns identified patients with esophagitis with higher levels of specificity (95%) and positive predictive values (96%) than wireless pH monitoring (64% and 40%, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Based on a prospective study using a prototype device, measurements of MI detect GERD with higher levels of specificity and positive predictive values than wireless pH monitoring. Clinical Trials.gov, Number: NCT01556919.

Therapeutic management of uncomplicated gastroesophageal reflux disease in france in 2005: Potential cost savings of omeprazole substitution

BACKGROUND

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) cost the French health care system >€1 billion in 2005, and ~50% of PPI prescriptions were for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to describe the current use of PPIs for GERD, to estimate the total annual costs of treatment, and to evaluate the economic impact of the various possible substitutions among PPIs available for this indication in France.

METHODS

Data from a sample of patients aged ≥20 years who visited their general practitioner (GP) at least once in 2005 for uncomplicated, symptomatic GERD were retrieved from the Thales database (a group of 1200 representative GPs connected to a computerized network). Costs of the prescriptions presented for reimbursement and costs of those reimbursed by the French health care insurance system were analyzed. We then evaluated the economic consequences of replacing full-dose generic omeprazole (after substitution from brand-name omeprazole by the pharmacists) with other compounds that are indicated for mild symptoms at half dose (ie, lansoprazole 15 mg, pantoprazole 20 mg, rabeprazole 10 mg, and esomeprazole 20 mg). The results were adjusted to account for the proportions of patients who had full health care coverage and the treatment duration as reported in the database. RESULTS are presented from the perspective of the French health care insurance system.

RESULTS

In 2005, a total of 122,571 patients (mean age, 55.7 years; 45.5% men; 13.8% with a history of at least 1 gastrointestinal disorder) met the inclusion criteria. Extrapolated to the French population, this sample corresponded to ≈5.7 million people (ie, 13% of the adult population who visited a GP during the year). PPIs were prescribed as first-line treatment for GERD in 84.1% of the consultations (14.3% in association with other antiulcer drugs). Omeprazole, as a proprietary or generic drug, was prescribed most often (78.9%) and at full dose (20 mg), while other compounds (lansoprazole, pantoprazole, rabeprazole, and esomeprazole) were prescribed at half dose in 64.3% of cases. The extrapolated annual cost of PPIs reimbursed for this indication was €465.02 million at a mean reimbursement level of 72.7%. Brand-name omeprazole still accounted for ≈11% of the total cost reimbursed. Complete replacement of brand-name omeprazole with its generic counterpart would have reduced costs by €18.35 million (a decrease of 4.3% in the total reimbursed expenditure). The switch from generic full-dose omeprazole to a half dose of other PPIs would have allowed further savings ranging from €2.59 million (with lansoprazole) to €13.19 million (with pantoprazole).

CONCLUSION

In accordance with recent recommendations for the treatment of uncomplicated GERD and based on the 2006 PPI pricing, switching from branded full-dose omeprazole to generic omeprazole or to the use of half doses of other PPIs may allow cost savings in France.

Possible etiology of improvements in both quality of life and overlapping gastroesophageal reflux disease by proton pump inhibitor treatment in a prospective randomized controlled trial

Background

Symptoms suggestive of functional dyspepsia (FD) and irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) frequently overlap with those of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Despite the high prevalence of symptomatic overlap, the underlying etiology remains poorly defined. We assessed the correlation of symptomatic relief and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) with healing of reflux esophagitis to further derive insights into the underlying etiology.

Methods

626 patients with reflux esophagitis were enrolled into one of two treatment groups (classical healing concept or the complete remission concept) to investigate differences in treatment intensity. Patients were treated with pantoprazole until esophageal mucosal healing. Remission was followed for up to 6 months without treatment. Gastro-intestinal symptoms and HRQoL were analyzed using disease-specific, psychometrically validated patient-reported outcome instruments (ReQuest™, GERDyzer™).

Results

Symptomatic burden reflected by ReQuest™ substantially decreased from baseline to end of treatment by 83% and 88% in either treatment group, respectively. ReQuest™ scores significantly decreased in patients with or without heartburn and in those with symptoms suggestive of FD and IBS, indicating response of all symptom categories to treatment (p < 0.005). Therapy-associated relief of symptoms was paralleled by substantial gains in HRQoL, which continued to stabilize post-treatment.

Conclusions

Pantoprazole is effective in relieving upper and lower gastro-intestinal symptoms overlapping with erosive esophagitis, and provides sustained improvement in HRQoL post-treatment. Our results propose a link between both healing of erosive esophagitis and the slower remission of upper and lower gastro-intestinal symptoms. Since the improvement observed is likely to be multifactorial, the possibility for an immune-mediated etiology and identification of putative susceptibility factors by genome-wide association study may provide focus for future research.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00325676.

Rabeprazole and esomeprazole in mild-to-moderate erosive gastroesophageal reflux disease: A comparative study of efficacy and safety

Objective:

To compare the efficacy and safety of rabeprazole and esomeprazole in mild-to-moderate erosive gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).

Materials and Methods:

A randomized, single-blinded, outdoor-based clinical study was conducted on 60 patients of mild-to-moderate erosive GERD. After baseline clinical assessment and investigations, rabeprazole (40 mg) was prescribed to 30 patients and esomeprazole (40 mg) to another 30 patients for 4 weeks. The efficacy variables were change in GERD symptom scoring, endoscopic findings, and Quality of Life in Reflux and Dyspepsia (QOLRAD) scoring over 4 weeks.

Result:

Heartburn, acid regurgitation, and overall GERD symptom scoring (P = 0.01) were significantly decreased with rabeprazole in comparison to esomeprazole. The comparative study of all five domains of the QOLARD questionnaire including overall scoring revealed a statistically significant improvement in the rabeprazole group. Endoscopic findings in the rabeprazole group showed an absolute improvement of 30% and relative improvement of 55% over esomeprazole. Both the drugs were well tolerated having no significant difference in the incidence of adverse effects.

Conclusion:

Rabeprazole (40 mg) is a better choice for mild-to-moderate GERD compared with esomeprazole (40 mg) because of its better efficacy and safety profile.

The daily response for proton pump inhibitor treatment in Japanese reflux esophagitis and non-erosive reflux disease

We investigated comparison according to reflux esophagitis and non-erosive reflux disease about “daily” symptom improvement for proton pump inhibitor treatment. We enrolled 57 reflux esophagitis and 90 non-erosive reflux disease patients. They took rabeprazole 10 mg/day for 28 days and completed “daily” in the Frequency Scale for the Symptoms of GERD from baseline until day 14, and after 28 days of treatment. The efficacy endpoint was the improvement rates in Frequency Scale for the Symptoms of GERD, based on baseline. Frequency Scale for the Symptoms of GERD was decreased in reflux esophagitis and non-erosive reflux disease (p<0.001) and was significantly lower in reflux esophagitis than in non-erosive reflux disease from the first day of treatment (p<0.05). Symptomatic improvement rates were also significantly higher in reflux esophagitis (50.3 ± 44.9%) than in non-erosive reflux disease (31.7 ± 43.2%) from the first day of treatment (p<0.0001). The symptomatic improvement rates in reflux esophagitis were significant increased from the second day of treatment until after 28 days of treatment (p = 0.0006), however, these in non-erosive reflux disease were significant increased from third days until after 28 days of treatment (p = 0.0002). In non-erosive reflux disease, the improvement of dysmotility symptom was particularly gradual as well as of reflux symptom, too. As for results of prediction of proton pump inhibitor response (completed symptom resolution) form early symptom improvement within 1 week, it was able to predict proton pump inhibitor response from the symptom improvement rate on 3 days in reflux esophagitis and on day 7 in non-erosive reflux disease. In conclusion, the prediction of the proton pump inhibitor response in non-erosive reflux disease was slow in comparison with reflux esophagitis. The cause was gradual improvement of dysmotility symptom.

Use of direct, endoscopic-guided measurements of mucosal impedance in diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Diagnostic tests for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) are constrained because measurements are made at a single time point, so the long-term effects on the mucosa cannot be determined. We developed a minimally invasive system to assess changes in esophageal mucosal impedance (MI), a marker of reflux. We measured the extent of changes in MI along the esophagus and show that the device to assess MI can be used to diagnose patients with GERD.

METHODS

A single-channel MI catheter composed of a unique sensor array was designed to easily traverse the working channel of an upper endoscope. We performed a prospective longitudinal study of patients with erosive esophagitis (n = 19), nonerosive but pH-positive GERD (n = 23), and those without GERD (n = 27). MI was measured at the site of esophagitis as well as 2, 5, and 10 cm above the squamocolumnar junction. The MI values were compared among groups, at different levels along the esophageal axis.

RESULTS

Median MI values were significantly lower at the site of erosive mucosa (811 Ω; range, 621-1272 Ω) than other nonerosive regions (3723 Ω; range, 2421-4671 Ω; P = .001), and were significantly lower at 2 cm above the squamocolumnar junction in patients with GERD (2096 Ω; range, 1415-2808 Ω), compared with those without GERD (3607 Ω; range, 1973-4238 Ω; P = .008). There was a significant and graded increase in MI along the axis of the distal to proximal esophagus in patients with GERD that was not observed in individuals without reflux (P = .004).

CONCLUSIONS

Measurements of MI along the esophagus can be used to identify patients with GERD. ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01194323.

Use of the Montreal global definition as an assessment of quality of life in reflux disease

According to the Montreal Consensus Group's classification, gastroesophageal reflux disease develops when the reflux of stomach contents causes troublesome symptoms and/or complications such as esophagitis. The characteristic gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms included in this statement are retrosternal burning and regurgitation. Troublesome is meant to imply that these symptoms impact on the well-being of affected individuals; in essence, quality of life (QOL). Whether heartburn and regurgitation symptoms would be characterized as more troublesome in those with confirmed pathologic acid reflux was determined. A second purpose was to assess how well troublesome scores correlated with the results of a validated, disease-specific QOL instrument. Subjects who underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) with 48-hour wireless esophageal pH testing off proton pump inhibitor therapy were interviewed. Esophagitis on EGD or pH < 4.0 for ≥4.5% of time over the 2-day period was considered positive for acid reflux. Assessment of how troublesome their symptoms of heartburn and regurgitation were made using separate 0-100 visual analog scales (VAS). Subjects were then asked to complete the Quality of Life in Reflux and Dyspepsia (QOLRAD) 25-item questionnaire. Sixty-seven patients (21 males, 46 females) with mean age 47.8 ± 15.6 years were identified. Forty (59.7%) had an EGD or pH study positive for acid reflux. Overall 35/40 (87.5%) complained of either heartburn or regurgitation. There was no difference (P= 0.80) in heartburn VAS troublesome ratings for those with (54.0 ± 43.9) and without (56.7 ± 37.6) confirmed acid reflux. The same was true for regurgitation VAS troublesome ratings (P= 0.62). Likewise, mean QOLRAD scores did not differ between those with and without confirmed acid reflux by pH or EGD (4.5 ± 1.7 vs. 4.3 ± 1.7; P= 0.61). There was a moderately strong inverse correlation between patient self-rated VAS troublesome scores for both heartburn and regurgitation with each dimension (emotional distress, sleep disturbance, eating problems, physical/social functioning, and vitality) of the QOLRAD (P < 0.05 for all comparisons). In regression analysis, both heartburn and regurgitation troublesome ratings were associated with the overall QOLRAD score independent of pH data, frequency of reflux episodes, age, and gender. Use of the term troublesome in the Montreal Consensus Group classification is supported by our findings. It correlates well with the results of a validated disease-specific QOL instrument. Use of heartburn and regurgitation VAS may serve as accurate measures of the burden of reflux disease on patients. It is likely that these scales will not have sufficient discriminate value to identify individuals with pathologic acid reflux from those with negative studies.

The usefulness of the original questionnaire in the evaluation of quality of life in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) constitutes a significant health problem in societies of high socioeconomic status. The notion of quality of life is broader than the definition of health and encompasses two aspects: the subjective and objective one. The tools used for the evaluation of quality of life are questionnaires. The aim of the study was the evaluation of the original quality of life questionnaire in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease treated for 4 weeks with a single dose of omeprazole at 20 mg daily.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The original quality of life questionnaire was formulated based on the Likert method. Four time levels of complaint persistence were introduced. The patients were asked 10 questions with earlier prepared answers marked by the respondents. Each of the questions corresponded to a certain time level of complaint persistence. The data obtained from the questionnaires were subject to statistical analysis. The studies were conducted on a group of 10,623 patients. Adequate methods were used in the statistical analysis of data from obtained answers. The significance threshold for each of the studies was p < 0.01, which means that the obtained conclusions are true with the probability of at least 99%. The majority of statistical calculations were performed with the use of STATISTICA 7.0 and Excel software.

RESULTS

Improvement of quality of life was found in all the studied aspects: physical (questions 1, 3, 4, 5, 7), functional (question 6), emotional (questions 2, 10) and social (questions 8, 9). No correlation with age or gender was found. The analysis of test correctness was conducted, revealing reliability, validity, sensitivity, appropriateness and practicality of the questionnaire.

CONCLUSIONS

1. The original quality of life questionnaire meets the requirements for the tools evaluating quality of life in gastroesophageal reflux disease. 2. The usefulness of questionnaire was confirmed in a group of 10,623 patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease in the Polish population. 3. The questionnaire equals the international tests, while its advantages are the ease of completion and high level of perception.

Correlation between symptomatic improvement and quality of life in patients with reflux and dyspeptic symptoms

We investigated the correlation between symptomatic improvement and quality of life in Japanese gastroesophageal reflux disease patients with PPI. Eighty one patients with reflux and dyspeptic symptom were enrolled. The evaluation of the symptom was used he Frequency Scale for the Symptom of GERD in 3 categories: total score of 12 questions, score related to reflux symptoms, and score related to dyspeptic symptoms and the evaluation of the quality of life was use the 8-item Short Form Health Survey in 2 categories, the physical component summary score and mental component summary score. All patients administered rabeprazole 10 mg/day for 8 weeks. We investigated the correlation between symptomatic improvement with proton pump inhibitor and quality of life. Significant symptomatic improvement was seen in the total score of 12 questions (26.7 ± 8.8 → 17.5 ± 5.9, p<0.0001), score related to reflux symptoms (14.9 ± 5.4 → 9.6 ± 3.6, p<0.0001), and score related to dyspeptic symptoms (11.8 ± 4.3 → 8.0 ± 2.9, p<0.0001). Significant improvement in quality of life was seen in the physical component summary score (47.8 ± 6.6 → 50.0 ± 5.9, p = 0.0209) and mental component summary score (47.4 ± 8.5 → 50.4 ± 5.3, p = 0.0133) with proton pump inhibitor. With proton pump inhibitor, a significant positive correlation was seen between the improvement rates in total score of 12 questions, score related to dyspeptic symptoms and in mental component summary score at 8 weeks (total score of 12 questions: r = 0.275, p = 0.0265, score related to dyspeptic symptoms: r = 0.367, p = 0.0027). In conclusion, quality of life was associated with improvement in dyspeptic symptoms with proton pump inhibitor treatment.

Cost-utility of laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication versus proton pump inhibitors for chronic and controlled gastroesophageal reflux disease: a 3-year prospective randomized controlled trial and economic evaluation

BACKGROUND

Very few randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have compared laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication (LNF) to proton pump inhibitors (PPI) medical management for patients with chronic gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Larger RCTs have been relatively short in duration, and have reported mixed results regarding symptom control and effect on quality of life (QOL). Economic evaluations have reported conflicting results.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the incremental cost-utility of LNF versus PPI for treating patients with chronic and controlled GERD over 3 years from the societal perspective.

METHODS

Economic evaluation was conducted alongside a RCT that enrolled 104 patients from October 2000 to September 2004. Primary study outcome was GERD symptoms (secondary outcomes included QOL and cost-utility). Resource utilization and QOL data collected at regular follow-up intervals determined incremental cost/QALY gained. Stochastic uncertainty was assessed using bootstrapping and methodologic assumptions were assessed using sensitivity analysis.

RESULTS

No statistically significant differences in GERD symptom scores, but LNF did result in fewer heartburn days and improved QOL. Costs were higher for LNF patients by $3205/patient over 3 years but QOL was also higher as measured by either QOL instrument. Based on total costs, incremental cost-utility of LNF was $29,404/QALY gained using the Health Utility Index 3. Cost-utility results were sensitive to the utility instrument used ($29,404/QALY for Health Utility Index 3, $31,117/QALY for the Short Form 6D, and $76,310/QALY for EuroQol 5D) and if current lower prices for PPIs were used in the analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Results varied depending on resource use/costs included in the analysis, the QOL instrument used, and the cost of PPIs; however, LNF was generally found to be a cost-effective treatment for patients with symptomatic controlled GERD requiring long-term management.

Cost minimization of on-demand maintenance therapy with proton pump inhibitors in nonerosive gastroesophageal reflux disease

On-demand proton pump inhibitor maintenance therapy is one of the suggested strategies for patients with nonerosive gastroesophageal reflux disease who achieve symptom remission after 4 weeks of continuous treatment. This review evaluates the difference in cost and quality of life of six on-demand proton pump inhibitor maintenance strategies in patients with nonerosive gastroesophageal reflux disease. This was performed by decision analysis and Markov modeling of costs (from the perspective of the healthcare service and society) and utility up to 12 months. Median utility scores associated with each proton pump inhibitor ranged from 0.731 to 0.745 quality-adjusted life years and were not statistically different. Annual expected cost, however, was statistically different among the different drugs and the following cost-minimization ranking was obtained for median costs to the healthcare service and society, respectively: rabeprazole (euro 181, euro 295), pantoprazole (euro 223, euro 341), lansoprazole (euro 249, euro 370), omeprazole 10 mg (euro 297, euro 412), esomeprazole (euro 295, euro 419) and omeprazole 20 mg (euro 405, euro 528). Unit cost of proton pump inhibitors was the major determinant of cost to the healthcare service, while the number of productivity days lost due to symptoms was the major determinant of cost to society. In Italy, on-demand use of rabeprazole for maintenance therapy of nonerosive gastroesophageal reflux disease incurs the least cost in comparison with the other proton pump inhibitors evaluated.

Effects of gastroesophageal reflux disease on sleep and outcomes

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Nighttime symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) are prevalent and have negative effects on sleep quality. We quantified the effects of GERD symptoms on sleep difficulties and their effects on outcomes.

METHODS

Data were obtained from a patient-reported survey conducted in 2006 among the general US population. Respondents who had experienced GERD symptoms at least twice during the past month were categorized as GERD patients and were subclassified into groups on the basis of nighttime symptoms and sleep difficulties. Outcomes included health care resource use in past 6 months, work productivity and activity impairment (WPAI), and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) based on results of the Short-Form Health Survey (SF-8). Regression analysis was used to adjust for demographics and clinical characteristics.

RESULTS

Of 11,685 survey respondents with GERD, 88.9% experienced nighttime symptoms, 68.3% sleep difficulties, 49.1% difficulty initiating asleep (induction symptoms), and 58.3% difficulty maintaining sleep (maintenance symptoms). Respondents with nighttime GERD symptoms were more likely to experience sleep difficulties (odds ratio, 1.53) and difficulties with induction (odds ratio, 1.43) and maintenance (odds ratio, 1.56) of sleep (P < .001 for all). Sleep difficulties were associated with 0.9 additional provider visits, a 5.5% increase in overall work impairment, a 10.9% increase in activity impairment, and reductions of 3.1 and 3.6 points in SF-8 physical and mental summary scores, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Nighttime GERD symptoms are associated with interruption of sleep induction and maintenance and result in considerable economic burden and reduction in HRQOL.

Treatment patterns and symptom control in patients with GERD: US community-based survey

BACKGROUND

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are the most commonly used pharmacological treatment for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).

OBJECTIVE

To examine the utilization patterns of PPIs and other GERD-related medications, satisfaction with PPI treatment and presence of GERD symptoms.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

GERD patients using prescription PPIs were identified from a mixed-model HMO health plan. Utilization patterns of PPIs and other GERD medications, satisfaction with PPI treatment and presence of GERD symptoms were assessed using questionnaires.

RESULTS

Among the 617 patients who completed the survey, 71.0% used PPIs once a day (QD), 22.2% used twice a day (BID) and 6.8% more than twice a day or on an as-needed basis. Approximately 42.1% of all patients supplemented their prescription PPIs with other GERD medications, including over-the-counter medications and H(2)-receptor antagonists. Over 85% of the patients still experienced GERD symptoms and 82.7% nighttime symptoms. Overall, 72.8% of all patients were satisfied or very satisfied with their PPI treatment.

LIMITATIONS

The study used self-reported data which may have been subject to recall bias. As the study was conducted in a specific region of the US, the results may have limited generalizability to other US regions or countries.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients on PPI treatment often experience GERD symptoms and supplement their prescription PPIs with other GERD medications. A substantial proportion of GERD patients receiving PPI treatment are on a BID regimen. Furthermore, more than a quarter of the patients are not completely satisfied with their PPI treatment.

Meta-analysis used to identify factors associated with the effectiveness of proton pump inhibitors against non-erosive reflux disease

BACKGROUND

A lack of published data remains on factors associated with the treatment response to proton pump inhibitors (PPI) in patients with non-erosive reflux disease (NERD).

METHODS

Studies on effectiveness of PPI in patients with NERD were identified using the MEDLINE database and manual searches of the available literature. Twenty publications that comprised a total of 22 study arms were eligible, and meta-analyses of these 22 study arms were carried out.

RESULTS

Overall improvement rate in patients with PPI was 68%. Univariate meta-regression analysis was used to explore the source of heterogeneity, P-value for males was 0.192, and in the presence of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection was 0.186, indicating that these factors are associated with treatment effectiveness. Thus, as the frequency of male and H. pylori-infected patients increased, the effectiveness of PPI against NERD improved. By multivariate meta-regression analysis, the P-value for male and H. pylori infection decreased further (P = 0.002 and P = 0.003, respectively), indicating little interaction between male sex and H. pylori infection.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that H. pylori infection and patient sex may be associated with the effectiveness of PPI against patients with NERD. The reasons are still unclear, and further examinations are needed to clarify them.

Health-related quality of life in patients with Barrett's esophagus: a systematic review

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Barrett's esophagus (BE) affects approximately 10% of patients with chronic gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Patients with BE are at risk for reduced health-related quality of life (HRQoL) associated with GERD, in addition to the potential psychosocial stress of carrying a diagnosis of a premalignant condition with a risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma. We sought to systematically review the published literature on HRQoL of patients with BE.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, PsycINFO, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature for relevant clinical trials using a defined search strategy. We also manually searched relevant scientific meeting abstracts and related article bibliographies. Eligible articles were case series, cohort studies, or clinical trials that included one or more measures of HRQoL and/or quantitatively assessed burden of disease in patients with BE. Effect sizes were calculated when possible.

RESULTS

Our initial search identified 95 articles. After 2 physician reviews, 25 articles met inclusion criteria. Data show that BE is associated with a significant decrement in HRQoL as measured by both generic and disease-targeted instruments. In addition, patients with BE are at risk for psychological consequences such as depression, anxiety, and stress, which may be related to their increased risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma. Compared with subjects with GERD alone or the general population, a diagnosis of BE also leads to increased health care use and spending.

CONCLUSIONS

BE compromises multiple facets of patients' quality of life. Physicians and researchers should incorporate patient-reported outcomes data including HRQoL measures when treating or studying patients with BE.

Clinical trial: dexlansoprazole MR, a proton pump inhibitor with dual delayed-release technology, effectively controls symptoms and prevents relapse in patients with healed erosive oesophagitis

BACKGROUND

Dexlansoprazole MR heals all grades of erosive oesophagitis (EO).

AIM

To assess efficacy and safety of dexlansoprazole MR in maintaining healed EO and heartburn relief.

METHODS

In this randomized, double-blind trial, 445 patients with healed EO received dexlansoprazole MR 30 mg or 60 mg or placebo once daily for 6 months. This trial assessed maintenance of endoscopic healing (primary endpoint) and continued symptom relief based on daily diaries (secondary endpoints).

RESULTS

Dexlansoprazole MR 30 mg and 60 mg were superior to placebo for maintaining healed EO (P < 0.0025; Hochberg's). By life-table analysis, maintenance rates were 75%, 83% and 27% for dexlansoprazole MR 30 mg, 60 mg and placebo respectively. Crude maintenance rates were 66% for both dexlansoprazole MR doses and 14% for placebo. Dexlansoprazole MR controlled heartburn (medians of 91-96% for 24-h heartburn-free days, 96-99% for heartburn-free nights). The only more common adverse event occurring at a significantly higher rate in dexlansoprazole MR groups than placebo when analysed per patient-months of exposure was upper respiratory tract infection.

CONCLUSIONS

Dexlansoprazole MR effectively maintained EO healing and symptom relief; most patients were heartburn-free for >90% of days. Both doses were well tolerated.

Strategy for treatment of nonerosive reflux disease in Asia

The paper is to review the clinical and pathophysiologic differences between of nonerosive reflux disease (NERD) and reflux esophagitis (RE), and to propose a treatment strategy for NERD, especially for patients in Asia. A Medline search was performed regarding the clinical and pathophysiologic differences between NERD and RE, and treatment of NERD and RE. The characteristics of NERD patients in Asia are as follows: (1) high proportion of female patients, (2) low frequency of hiatal hernia, (3) high frequency of H pylori infection, (4) severe glandular atrophy of the gastric mucosa, and (5) frequent resistance to proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy. In Asian NERD patients, exposure of the esophagus to acid is not increased, and esophageal motility is normal. These characteristics are similar to those of patients in Western countries. Our recommended first-choice treatment is administration of PPI in combination with a prokinetic agent. However, at present, because there is limited evidence regarding effective treatments for NERD, it is best to try several different treatment strategies to find the best treatment for each patient.

Applying data mining techniques in the development of a diagnostics questionnaire for GERD

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common condition, managed mostly in primary care practice. Heartburn and acid regurgitation are considered primary symptoms, and are usually highly specific. However, the symptom spectrum is much wider and in many cases it is difficult to determine whether the patient has GERD or dyspepsia from another origin. The aim of this study is to develop a symptom score and rule for the diagnosis of GERD, using data mining techniques, to provide a clinical diagnostic tool for primary care practitioners in the evaluation and management of upper gastrointestinal symptoms. A diagnostic symptom questionnaire consisting of 15 items and based on the current literature was designed to measure the presence and severity of reflux and dyspepsia symptoms using a 5-point Likert-type scale. A total of 132 subjects with uninvestigated upper abdominal symptoms were prospectively recruited for symptom evaluation. All patients were interviewed and examined, underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, and completed the questionnaire. Based on endoscopic findings as well as the medical interview, the subjects were classified as having reflux disease (GERD) or non-reflux disease (non-GERD). Data mining models and algorithms (neural networks, decision trees, and logistic regression) were used to build a short and simple new discriminative questionnaire. The most relevant variables discriminating GERD from non-GERD patients were heartburn, regurgitation, clinical response to antacids, sour taste, and aggravation of symptoms after a heavy meal. The sensitivity and specificity of the new symptom score were 70%-75% and 63%-78%, respectively. The area under the ROC curve for logistic regression and neural networks were 0.783 and 0.787, respectively. We present a new validated discriminative GERD questionnaire using data mining techniques. The questionnaire is useful, friendly, and short, and therefore can be easily applied in clinical practice for choosing the appropriate diagnostic workup for patients with upper gastrointestinal complaints.

Pantoprazole on-demand effectively treats symptoms in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease

OBJECTIVE

The efficacy of pantoprazole as on-demand therapy for the long-term management of patients with mild gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) has been demonstrated in clinical studies. In this study, the efficacy of pantoprazole 20mg and esomeprazole 20mg as on-demand therapy for relief of symptoms of mild GORD was compared.

METHODS

Patients with reflux oesophagitis grade A or B (Los Angeles classification) or endoscopy-negative reflux disease (enGORD) were treated with pantoprazole 20mg once daily for 28 days during the acute phase (AP, n = 236). Patients without heartburn during the final 3 days of the AP entered the long-term phase (LTP, n = 199) and were randomised to either pantoprazole 20mg or esomeprazole 20mg as on-demand treatment for 6 months. Antacids were provided as rescue medication during this phase. The mean intensities of the symptoms of heartburn, acid eructation and pain on swallowing, both separately and as a combined symptom score, together with the mean duration of these symptoms during on-demand treatment, were compared between the two treatment groups. The number of tablets taken was also compared.

RESULTS

After 4 weeks of treatment with pantoprazole, 87.3% of patients had relief from heartburn, 74.1% from epigastric pain and 80.8% from acid eructation, according to the investigator assessment. A total of 236 patients were eligible for the on-demand phase. Based on patient diary data, on-demand treatment with pantoprazole resulted in significantly lower mean intensity of heartburn compared with that in the esomeprazole group (1.12 for pantoprazole and 1.32 for esomeprazole, respectively [p = 0.012], in the intention-to-treat [ITT] population). The mean symptom intensities of acid eructation and pain on swallowing, together with the duration of these symptoms, were comparable in the two treatment groups. The combined symptom score of the three symptoms heartburn, acid eructation and pain on swallowing was numerically lower in the pantoprazole group compared with the esomeprazole group (1.72 vs 1.99, respectively, in the ITT population). Tablet intake was comparable in both groups. Relief of symptoms in Helicobacter pylori-positive and -negative patients was also similar in both treatment groups. Both treatments were well tolerated with a good safety profile.

CONCLUSION

On-demand therapy with either pantoprazole 20mg or esomeprazole 20mg is a comparably effective treatment strategy for the long-term treatment of non-erosive and mild GORD. However, the mean intensity of heartburn was significantly lower with pantoprazole treatment.

Helicobacter pylori infection and gastroesophageal reflux in a population-based study (The HUNT Study)

BACKGROUND AND AIM

It has been suggested that Helicobacter pylori infection may prevent gastroesophageal reflux, possibly through gastric atrophy. Since, however, previous results are contradictory and no population-based studies are available, the relationship between H. pylori and reflux remains uncertain. The aim of this study was to investigate this relationship in a population-based, nested, case-control study.

METHODS

From a cohort of 65,363 individuals, representing 71.2% of the adult population in the Norwegian county of Nord-Trondelag, we randomly selected 472 persons with recurrent reflux symptoms (cases) and 472 without such symptoms (controls). Occurrence of H. pylori and its virulence factor cagA was determined serologically, using an immunoblot assay. Gastric atrophy was assessed through serum levels of pepsinogen I. Odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI), adjusted for potential confounding factors, represented relative risks.

RESULTS

H. pylori infection was not associated with a decreased risk of reflux symptoms (OR 1.1, 95% CI 0.8-1.6), irrespective of positive cagA status (OR 1.1, 95% CI 0.8-1.5). Gastric atrophy reduced the risk of reflux symptoms (OR 0.2, 95% CI 0.0-0.6). Infection with H. pylori entailed a ninefold increase in the risk of gastric atrophy compared to non-infection (OR 8.9, 95% CI 2.0-39.9).

CONCLUSIONS

H. pylori infection, irrespective of cagA status, did not affect the occurrence of reflux symptoms in this population-based setting. Infected individuals are at increased risk of gastric atrophy, which in turn reduces reflux symptoms, but due to the low frequency of gastric atrophy among infected individuals overall, there was no association with reflux symptoms on a population level.

Increased esophageal sensitivity to acid and saline in patients with nonerosive gastro-esophageal reflux disease

GOALS

To investigate the features of nonerosive reflux disease (NERD).

BACKGROUND

NERD is not considered as a milder form of erosive gastro-esophageal reflux disease (eGERD). Although the prevalence of NERD was reported to be high in our country, there have been very few studies about NERD.

STUDY

We performed upper gastrointestinal endoscopy to confirm the diagnosis of GERD. The modified acid perfusion test and saline perfusion test were performed in 7 control subjects, 14 NERD, and 11 eGERD patients. The stimulus-response function to acid and saline was quantified by the duration of typical symptom perception (minutes), total sensory intensity rating (0 to 10), and the perfusion sensory score (SS), which was defined as the product of minutes and the sensory intensity rating.

RESULTS

The mean value of SS by saline was 0 in control subjects, 12.0 in NERD patients, and 1.5 in eGERD patients (P<0.01 control vs. NERD, P<0.01 NERD vs. eGERD). The mean SS with acid was 0.9 in control subjects, 52.5 in NERD patients, and 23.0 in eGERD patients (P<0.01 control vs. NERD, control vs. eGERD, P<0.05 NERD vs. eGERD). A statistically significant association was shown between the acid and saline perfusion SSs with a correlation coefficient value of r=0.57 in the NERD group (P<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Both eGERD and NERD, but especially NERD, exhibited esophageal hypersensitivity not only to acid but also saline perfusion, suggesting that hyperalgesia to acid and other factors (eg, psychologic and/or autonomic nerve disturbance) may play some roles in symptom generation in NERD.

Evaluation of health-related quality of life in gastroesophageal reflux disease patients before and after treatment with pantoprazole

Gastrooesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is highly prevalent in the Western world but its true population prevalence is difficult to estimate without a validated instrument to detect it. The evaluation of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is an useful tool in this assessment. The aims of this study are to translate and validate a GERD specific HRQoL questionnaire and evaluate HRQoL in a Brazilian population before and after GERD treatment. GERD patients with typical symptoms and Los Angeles Classes A to C esophagitis were included in the study. Two HRQoL questionnaires and upper digestive endoscopy were performed before and after 6 weeks treatment with pantoprazole 40 mg/day followed by 80 mg/day for another 8 weeks if healing did not occur. A generic (SF-36) and one disease-specific questionnaire (GERD score) were used. The latter was translated and validated for Brazilian Portuguese. From January 2002 to December 2003, 100 patients were enrolled. Of these, 78 patients were evaluated in a per protocol analysis (35 men, mean age: 40 years). The translated questionnaire (Brazilian GERD Score, BGERDS) demonstrated adequate psychometric properties (validity, responsiveness and reliability). SF-36 and BGERDS domains significantly improved after treatment (P < 0.01 and P < 0.001 respectively). The BGERDS was shown to be valid and reliable. Patients with esophagitis showed an impaired HRQoL that improved or normalized after treatment with pantoprazole.

The relation between gastroesophageal reflux and respiratory symptoms in a population-based study: the Nord-Trøndelag health survey

BACKGROUND

In spite of numerous investigations, the relation between respiratory symptoms and reflux symptoms in the general population remains unclear, since population-based studies are few.

STUDY OBJECTIVES

To investigate the relation between respiratory symptoms and reflux symptoms in the population.

SUBJECT AND METHODS

In a cohort of 65,363 individuals representing 71.2% of the adult population in the Norwegian county of Nord-Trøndelag, 58,596 individuals (89.6%) responded to questions concerning reflux symptoms. The 3,153 persons (5.4%) with severe and recurrent reflux symptoms constituted the case group, and the 40,210 persons (68.6%) without reflux symptoms served as the control group. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) represented relative risks. Potential confounding was tested in multivariable logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

Persons with asthma had reflux to a 60% greater extent than those without asthma after including adjustment for asthma medication (OR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.4 to 1.9). There was a statistically significant dose-response association between breathlessness and reflux symptoms (p for trend < 0.0001), and the OR of severe breathlessness was 12.0 (95% CI, 9.5 to 15.2). Persons with heavy and wheezy breathing, daily cough, daily productive cough, or chronic cough showed a twofold to threefold statistically significant increase in risk of reflux symptoms. Adjustment for asthma or use of asthma medication did not substantially influence the risk estimates for any of the studied respiratory disorders.

CONCLUSIONS

Reflux symptoms commonly coexist with asthma and other respiratory symptoms on a population-based level, seemingly irrespective of asthma medication.

Impact of referral for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease on the workload of an academic Gastroenterology Unit

BACKGROUND

Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease is known to be a frequent cause of patients' referral to hospital gastroenterologists.

AIM

To increase knowledge on referral for reflux disease, in an Italian academic setting.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The impact of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease on 1 year's workload, comprising upper endoscopy, outpatients' consultations in the general clinic, oesophageal pH monitoring and oesophageal manometry was retrospectively assessed. Appropriateness of oesophageal pH monitoring and oesophageal manometry was also evaluated.

RESULTS

Endoscopy: Out of 2269 upper endoscopies reflux symptoms comprised 16.9% (n=386) of referrals; 19.1% only of these 386 patients had erosive oesophagitis at endoscopy and none had oesophagogastric malignancies (68% of the patients were >45 years). Consultations: Thirty-three percent out of 553 patients were referred for reflux symptoms. Upper endoscopy had already been performed before consultation in 64% of them. pH monitoring and oesophageal manometry: Two hundred and sixteen oesophageal pH monitorings and 160 oesophageal manometries were performed and 29% and 28%, respectively, were inappropriate, being performed in the diagnostic work-up of patients with typical reflux symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

At an academic Gastroenterology Unit, (a) gastro-oesophageal reflux disease is a frequent referral for upper endoscopy and consultations, (b) prevalence of oesophagitis is low, (c) consultation is preceded by endoscopy in the majority of patients and (d) oesophageal pH monitoring and oesophageal manometry are often inappropriately used.

Review article: quality-of-life issues in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease

The purpose of this review is to explore issues relating to quality of life in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease, examining the range of generic and disease-specific instruments available, their applicability and limitations and to overview the effect of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease on quality of life. Whereas instruments have been developed to assist researchers, there is a paucity of reliable instruments for pragmatic use in the clinical setting. The situation is complicated because there is not necessarily a direct correlation between endoscopic findings and symptom severity and non-erosive reflux disease is now recognized as an important manifestation of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. However, quality-of-life instruments are useful in evaluating the impact of therapies and interventions, although these are limited, particularly in surgical interventions. Impaired quality of life now forms part of a definition of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease, the impact of which goes beyond the symptoms alone. While the symptoms themselves have a negative effect on sufferers' lives, there are secondary effects caused by impaired physical, emotional and social functioning on productivity. Non-gastrointestinal problems caused by gastro-oesophageal reflux disease also impair quality of life. There is an ongoing need to develop instruments which truly measure the impact of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and which are readily interpretable to the individual patient and clinician.

Efficacy of famotidine and omeprazole in healing symptoms of non-erosive gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: randomized-controlled study of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease

BACKGROUND

The epidemiology and pathophysiology of non-erosive gastro-oesophageal reflux disease differs from erosive gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. There is a possibility that non-erosive gastro-oesophageal reflux disease treatment requires a different regimen/approach but it is not yet acknowledged.

AIM

To investigate the efficacy of famotidine and omeprazole in the treatment of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease, especially non-erosive gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A randomized, open-label trial was conducted. Fifty-four gastro-oesophageal reflux disease patients were assigned to treatment with famotidine at a dosage of 20 mg twice daily; or omeprazole, 20 mg once daily, for a period of 8 weeks. The Short Form-36 Health Survey and Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale administered at baseline and after 8 weeks of treatment as well as a symptom questionnaire were conducted daily.

RESULTS

Short Form-36 revealed that gastro-oesophageal reflux disease has severe impact on health-related quality of life. Thirty-nine subjects (77%) were endoscopically diagnosed as non-erosive gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. The mean Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale abdominal pain, and indigestion score of non-erosive gastro-oesophageal reflux disease significantly improved in famotidine-treated patients (P < 0.05), but not in the omeprazole. There was no significant change regarding improved heartburn symptoms of non-erosive gastro-oesophageal reflux disease between treatments in the daytime or night-time.

CONCLUSION

Famotidine and omeprazole were both effective in improving symptoms of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease, particularly non-erosive gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.

Long-term treatment of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease patients with frequent symptomatic relapses using rabeprazole: on-demand treatment compared with continuous treatment

BACKGROUND

On-demand treatment may be an alternative in the long-term treatment of non-severe gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in patients with frequent symptomatic relapses.

AIM

To compare the efficacy of on-demand treatment with rabeprazole 10 mg versus continuous treatment in the long-term treatment of patients with frequent symptomatic relapses of mild to moderate gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.

METHODS

This randomized, open-label study enrolled patients diagnosed with non-erosive reflux disease or oesophagitis grade 1 or 2 (Savary-Miller classification) reporting frequent symptomatic relapses (requiring > or =2 courses of antisecretory therapy during the previous year), whose intensity is rated at least moderate (>2 on a 5-point Likert scale). After a 4-week selection phase with rabeprazole 10 mg once daily, patients reporting symptom relief (Likert score < or =2) were randomized to receive either rabeprazole 10 mg continuous treatment or on-demand treatment for 6 months. The main evaluation criterion was the rate of symptom relief (scored on the Likert scale) after 6 months.

RESULTS

One hundred and seventy-six patients were enrolled in the 4-week selection phase (men, 53%; mean age, 49 years; non-erosive reflux disease, 36.4%; gastro-oesophageal reflux disease 1, 53.4%; gastro-oesophageal reflux disease 2, 10.2%). Rabeprazole relieved symptoms in 88.6% of patients. Of this group, 152 were randomized to the comparative phase to receive rabeprazole 10 mg continuous treatment (once daily) or on-demand treatment (continuous treatment, n = 81; on-demand treatment, n = 71). At month 6 (end point), the symptom relief rate was slightly higher for patients in the continuous treatment group compared with those in the on-demand treatment group: 86.4% versus 74.6%, respectively. This difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.065). For the overall quality of life score, there was no difference between the continuous treatment and on-demand treatment groups (86.25 and 84.94). Mean daily consumption of rabeprazole was significantly lower in the on-demand treatment group versus the continuous treatment group (0.31 tablets versus 0.96 tablets; P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

On-demand therapy with rabeprazole 10 mg provides an alternative to continuous therapy in patients with mild to moderate gastro-oesophageal reflux disease suffering from frequent symptomatic relapses.

Do physicians correctly assess patient symptom severity in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease?

BACKGROUND

The accuracy of physicians' assessment of the severity of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease is unclear.

AIM

To correlate physician and patient assessment of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease severity and its response to treatment.

METHODS

Adult uninvestigated gastro-oesophageal reflux disease patients (n = 217) completed symptom and health-related quality of life questionnaires at baseline and after treatment with esomeprazole 40 mg p.o. daily. Pearson coefficients quantified correlations between physician assessments and patient responses.

RESULTS

At baseline, the strongest correlations were heartburn severity (0.31), overall symptom severity (0.44) and a domain of the quality of life in reflux and dyspepsia questionnaire (0.31) (P < 0.001). Correlations of change with treatment were greater than baseline correlations: heartburn (0.39), overall symptoms (0.50) and global rate of change -- stomach problems (0.72, all P < 0.001). The mean difference between the physicians' assessment of change and the patients' global rating of change was 0.20 (95% confidence intervals: 0.10-0.29) with physicians overestimating benefit.

CONCLUSIONS

Correlations were often significant, although weak to moderate and better with symptom severity than with health-related quality of life instruments as well as with change after therapy than at baseline. Increasing attention to health-related quality of life may help physicians better understand patients' experience. In clinical trials, treatment success should be assessed by the patient as well as the physician.

The quality of life of gastroesophageal reflux disease patients waiting for an antireflux operation

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this trial was to measure the health-related quality of life (HRQL) of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) patients waiting for an antireflux operation.

METHODS

A total of 120 patients waiting for a laparoscopic fundoplication were sent questionnaires measuring their symptoms and quality of life.

RESULTS

Ninety-five of the patients still needing an operation returned the questionaires and were included in the analysis. Thirty-one of 84 patients (37%) felt that the symptoms had worsened, and 51/90 (57%) were unsatisfied. Thirty percent suffered from throat or airway infections, 25% from swallowing difficulties, 48% from retrosternal pain, and 18% had asthma. The mean GERD HRQL score (0-45) was 21.7 (95% confidence interval, 19.7-23.7). Short Form-36 scores of this population were significantly worse when compared to patients with inguinal hernia or moderate asthma.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients waiting for a fundoplication seem to have a significantly decreased health-related quality of life due to poor symptom control regardless of continuous medical treatment.

Non-pharmacologic treatment strategies in gastroesophageal reflux disease

In the West, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common and well-recognized disease. Lately, it has been described as an emerging problem in the East as well. While it is not a rapidly fatal illness, it causes a myriad of disturbing symptoms that remarkably reduce the patients' quality of life (QOL). The economic impact that results from multiple consultations, diagnostic investigations, and administration of a variety of treatment regimens, including surgery, is enormous. The operative management for GERD is fundoplication, for example Toupet (270 degree wrap of the distal esophagus) and Nissen (360 degree wrap of the distal esophagus). These surgical procedures are aimed at permanently controlling acid reflux by reconstructing the gastroesophageal junction. Currently, the ease, aesthetic advantages, and the comparable outcomes achieved by minimally invasive laparoscopic fundoplication have rekindled interest in the operative alternatives of GERD management. Fundoplication controls or diminishes considerably the severity of the symptoms associated with GERD. However, appearance of new symptoms i.e. dysphagia, 'gas-bloat syndrome', etc. as postoperative events have been reported. Recently, several innovative endoluminal treatment modalities have been introduced, namely; endoscopic plicator/suturing devices, bulking injections, and radiofrequency treatment. They are focused on enhancing the performance of a malfunctioning lower esophageal sphincter. While results of several case series reflect substantial improvements in GERD-HRQL scores, lack of long-term durability data is a major concern when recommending these novel, relatively simple, peroral techniques to a long suffering patient. It is clear that these therapies are still evolving and long-term outcomes of properly designed comparative efficacy trials are awaited.