Oral contraceptives and bone mineral density: A population-based study

Hormonal and non-hormonal oral contraceptives given long-term to pubertal rats differently affect bone mass, quality and metabolism

Introduction

We investigated the effects of hormonal and non-hormonal oral contraceptives (OCs) on bone mass, mineralization, composition, mechanical properties, and metabolites in pubertal female SD rats.

Methods

OCs were given for 3-, and 7 months at human equivalent doses. The combined hormonal contraceptive (CHC) was ethinyl estradiol and progestin, whereas the non-hormonal contraceptive (NHC) was ormeloxifene. MicroCT was used to assess bone microarchitecture and BMD. Bone formation and mineralization were assessed by static and dynamic histomorphometry. The 3-point bending test, nanoindentation, FTIR, and cyclic reference point indentation (cRPI) measured the changes in bone strength and material composition. Bone and serum metabolomes were studied to identify potential biomarkers of drug efficacy and safety and gain insight into the underlying mechanisms of action of the OCs.

Results

NHC increased bone mass in the femur metaphysis after 3 months, but the gain was lost after 7 months. After 7 months, both OCs decreased bone mass and deteriorated trabecular microarchitecture in the femur metaphysis and lumbar spine. Also, both OCs decreased the mineral: matrix ratio and increased the unmineralized matrix after 7 months. After 3 months, the OCs increased carbonate: phosphate and carbonate: amide I ratios, indicating a disordered hydroxyapatite crystal structure susceptible to resorption, but these changes mostly reversed after 7 months, indicating that the early changes contributed to demineralization at the later time. In the femur 3-point bending test, CHC reduced energy storage, resilience, and ultimate stress, indicating increased susceptibility to micro-damage and fracture, while NHC only decreased energy storage. In the cyclic loading test, both OCs decreased creep indentation distance, but CHC increased the average unloading slope, implying decreased microdamage risk and improved deformation resistance by the OCs. Thus, reduced bone mineralization by the OCs appears to affect bone mechanical properties under static loading, but not its cyclic loading ability. When compared to an age-matched control, after 7 months, CHC affected 24 metabolic pathways in bone and 9 in serum, whereas NHC altered 17 in bone and none in serum. 6 metabolites were common between the serum and bone of CHC rats, suggesting their potential as biomarkers of bone health in women taking CHC.

Conclusion

Both OCs have adverse effects on various skeletal parameters, with CHC having a greater negative impact on bone strength.

Association of hormone preparations with bone mineral density, osteopenia, and osteoporosis in postmenopausal women: data from National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1999-2018

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the associations of hormone preparations with lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD), osteopenia, and osteoporosis in postmenopausal women, and whether these impacts persisted after hormone preparations were discontinued.

METHODS

A total of 6,031 postmenopausal women were enrolled and divided into seven groups based on the types of hormone preparations. Among them, 1,996 participants were further divided into a current users (CU) group and a past users (PU) group. Multivariable linear regression models or logistic regression models were used to evaluate the associations of hormone preparation with lumbar spine BMD, osteopenia, and osteoporosis.

RESULTS

Combined oral contraceptive pills, estrogen-only pills, estrogen/progestin combo pills, estrogen-only patches, or the use of more than two kinds of hormone preparations were positively associated with lumbar spine BMD (all P < 0.05). Except for estrogen-only patches, other hormone preparations also had a protective effect against osteopenia (all OR < 1, all P < 0.05), but none of them were associated with osteoporosis prevalence (all P > 0.05). The BMD increased by 0.10 and 0.04 g/cm 2 in the CU and PU groups, respectively, compared with the nonusers group (all P < 0.05). In both the CU and PU groups, the risk of osteopenia was reduced (OR, 0.34 and 0.57, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Hormone preparations increase lumbar spine BMD in postmenopausal women and exert a protective effect against osteopenia. These impacts persisted after hormone preparations were discontinued. Hormone preparations, however, were not associated with osteoporosis prevalence.

Bone health and hormonal contraception

INTRODUCTION

Short-term and long-term steroid contraceptive systems are widely employed in adolescents and premenopausal women; they could induce variation in bone metabolism, but whether these changes increase the overall fracture risk is not yet clear.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

A systematic search of scientific publications about "hormonal contraceptives" and "bone metabolism" in reproductive age women was conducted.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

In adolescent girl, combined oral contraceptives could have a deleterious effect on bone health when their onset is within three years after menarche and when they contain ethinyl estradiol at the dose of 20 mcg. In perimenopausal women, steroid contraceptives seem not influence bone health nor increase osteoporotic fractures risk in menopause. The oral progestogens intake is not related to negative effects on skeletal health. Depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) induce a prolonged hypoestrogenism with secondary detrimental effect on healthy bone; the higher bone loss was observed at the DMPA dose of 150 mg intramuscular such as after long-term DMPA-users. Progestin-based implants and intrauterine devices have not negative effect on bone health.

CONCLUSIONS

Since sex-steroid drugs induce variations in hormonal circulating concentrations, they may negatively affect bone metabolism. Contraceptive choice should be tailored evaluating any possible effect on bone health. Clinicians should always perform a precontraceptive counselling to identify any coexisting condition that may affect bone health. Further randomized studies are needed to confirm these results.

Association of Female Reproductive Factors With Incidence of Fracture Among Postmenopausal Women in Korea

IMPORTANCE

Although estrogen level is positively associated with bone mineral density, there are limited data on the risk of fractures after menopause.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether female reproductive factors are associated with fractures among postmenopausal women.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This population-based retrospective cohort study used data from the Korean National Health Insurance Service database on 1 272 115 postmenopausal women without previous fracture who underwent both cardiovascular and breast and/or cervical cancer screening from January 1 to December 31, 2009. Outcome data were obtained through December 31, 2018.

EXPOSURES

Information was obtained about reproductive factors (age at menarche, age at menopause, parity, breastfeeding, and exogenous hormone use) by self-administered questionnaire.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Incidence of any fractures and site-specific fractures (vertebral, hip, and others).

RESULTS

Among the 1 272 115 participants, mean (SD) age was 61.0 (8.1) years. Compared with earlier age at menarche (≤12 years), later age at menarche (≥17 years) was associated with a higher risk of any fracture (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.24; 95% CI, 1.17-1.31) and vertebral fracture (aHR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.28-1.58). Compared with earlier age at menopause (<40 years), later age at menopause (≥55 years) was associated with a lower risk of any fracture (aHR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.86-0.93), vertebral fracture (aHR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.73-0.81), and hip fracture (aHR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.78-1.00). Longer reproductive span (≥40 years) was associated with lower risk of fractures compared with shorter reproductive span (<30 years) (any fracture: aHR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.84-0.88; vertebral fracture: aHR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.71-0.76; and hip fracture: aHR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.80-0.95). Parous women had a lower risk of any fracture than nulliparous women (aHR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.92-0.99). Although breastfeeding for 12 months or longer was associated with a higher risk of any fractures (aHR, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.03-1.08) and vertebral fractures (aHR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.17-1.27), it was associated with a lower risk of hip fracture (aHR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.76-0.93). Hormone therapy for 5 years or longer was associated with lower risk of any factures (aHR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.83-0.88), while use of oral contraceptives for 1 year or longer was associated with a higher risk of any fractures (aHR, 1.03; 95% CI, 1.01-1.05).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

The findings of this cohort study suggest that female reproductive factors are independent risk factors for fracture, with a higher risk associated with shorter lifetime endogenous estrogen exposure. Interventions to reduce fracture risk may be needed for women at high risk, including those without osteoporosis.

Are the Effects of Oral and Vaginal Contraceptives on Bone Formation in Young Women Mediated via the Growth Hormone-IGF-I Axis?

Purpose: Combined hormonal contraceptive therapy has been associated with negative bone mineral density outcomes that may be route-dependent [i.e., combined oral contraception (COC) vs. contraceptive vaginal ring (CVR)] and involve the hepatic growth hormone (GH)/insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) axis. The objective of the pilot study was to assess the impact of route of contraceptive administration on IGF-I and procollagen type I N-terminal propeptide (PINP) responses to an IGF-I Generation Test. We hypothesized that the peak rise in IGF-I and PINP concentration and area under the curve (AUC) would be attenuated following COC, but not CVR, use. Methods: Healthy, premenopausal women not taking hormonal contraception were recruited. Women were enrolled in the control group (n = 8) or randomly assigned to COC (n = 8) or CVR (n = 8) for two contraceptive cycles. IGF-I Generation Tests were used as a probe to stimulate IGF-I release and were completed during the pre-intervention and intervention phases. Serum IGF-I and PINP were measured during both IGF-I Generation Tests. The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02367833). Results: Compared to the pre-intervention phase, peak IGF-I concentration in response to the IGF-I Generation Test in the intervention phase was suppressed in the COC group (p < 0.001), but not the CVR or Control groups (p > 0.090). Additionally, compared to the pre-intervention phase, PINP AUC during the intervention phase was suppressed in both COC and CVR groups (p < 0.001), while no difference was observed in the control group (p = 0.980). Conclusion: These data suggest that changes in recombinant human GH-stimulated hepatic IGF-I synthesis in response to combined hormonal contraception (CHC) use are dependent on route of CHC administration, while the influence on PINP is route-independent. Future research is needed to expand these results with larger randomized control trials in all age ranges of women who utilize hormonal contraception. Clinical Trial Registration: www.ClinicalTrials.gov registration NCT02367833.

Hormonal contraceptives: pharmacology tailored to women's health

BACKGROUND

In recent years, several new oral contraceptives have become available. In some ways, they represent an evolution in terms of individualization and compliance on the part of women. The new formulations make it increasingly possible to prescribe a specific hormonal contraceptive on an individual basis.

METHODS

A systematic literature search of PubMed was performed using the following combination of terms: 'oral contraceptives', 'estroprogestins' and 'combined oral contraceptive'. Only English-language papers published between January 2000 and July 2014 were included in our analysis. The present review analyzes all aspects of the choice of oral contraceptives in the different phases of a woman's life in detail.

RESULTS

Regarding the estrogen component, lowering the dose of ethinylestradiol (EE) helped reduce associated side effects. Natural estradiol is now available and represents a valid alternative to EE. And regarding progestins, the dose has changed over time, as well as the endocrine and metabolic characteristics. These are the fruit of much research into improvement of old products (19-nor-progesterone-derived progestins) with androgenic effects and testing of new molecules with improved metabolic neutrality in terms of insulin sensitivity and lipid parameters. New progestins were a genuine turning point because they greatly reduced major side effects, such as water retention, and their anti-androgenic properties made them indicated for all forms of hyperandrogenism associated with acne and mild hirsutism. The associations of estradiol/dienogest and estradiol/nomegestrol acetate are the most suitable contraceptives for women with abundant menstrual bleeding and can increase the number of potential users of hormonal contraception.

CONCLUSION

Progress in the provision of new oral contraceptives has improved the risk/benefit ratio, by increasing benefits and reducing risks. The present challenge is to tailor contraceptives to individual needs in terms of efficacy and protection of reproductive health.

The effect of oral contraceptive different patterns of use on circulating IGF-1 and bone mineral density in healthy premenopausal women

Both insulin-like growth factor-1(IGF-1) and oral contraceptive (OC) use have been linked to premenopausal breast and colorectal cancers, osteoporosis and cardiovascular disease. Understanding the effects of different patterns of use of OC on IGF-1 levels and bone mineral density (BMD) may offer insight into its influence on osteoporosis. We conducted a cross-sectional study, which included 135 women, who were then divided into three groups: Group A who were OC current users, 41 women; Group B who never use OC, 51 women; and Group C who were past users of OC, 41 women. Each patient completed a questionnaire on demographic parameters, marital state history and contraception history including duration of use and type of contraceptive pills or used method. Lower-end radius, proximal femur and lumbar spine BMD were measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. IGF-1 was assessed with chemiluminescent immunometric assay. The three groups were similar in total body T value of BMD (with slight better results in past users than the other two groups but it was statistically insignificant difference), and past users showed significantly higher BMD values compared to current users at spine, femur and forearm. Nonusers also had better BMD values compared to current users (spine and forearm BMD). Among past users, the mean level of circulating IGF-1 was higher than the other two groups and that difference was statistically significant. Past OC use and/or nonuse has a more favorable impact on BMD compared to current use and that this relationship is in part mediated by IGF-1. Hence, it appears that OC use is beneficial to BMD if used in the past and then discontinued or if never used at all compared to current use.

Reasons for referral to bone densitometry in men and women aged 20-49 years: population-based data

INTRODUCTION

Osteoporosis poses a significant public health problem for ageing Australians. However, approximately 25 % of Australian adults aged 20-49 years have osteopenia, a precursor condition to osteoporosis. Despite this, little is known about bone density testing in this age group.

METHODS

Reasons for referral to dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) were examined in 2,264 patients aged 20-49 years, referred in 2001-2010 to the Geelong Bone Densitometry Service, Geelong Hospital, Victoria. Referral reasons were determined from clinical indication codes derived from patient records. Age, sex and bone mineral density (BMD) T scores were ascertained for each patient.

RESULTS

The most common reason for referral for women reflected glucocorticoid use, and for men reflected fracture. Compared to women, men were more likely to have been referred because of minimal trauma fracture or low BMD (41.7 versus 27.1 %, p < 0.001). No further differences were identified between the sexes, with similar numbers of referral observed for secondary osteoporosis, and monitoring of drug therapy. At the spine, and for all indications, men had a significantly greater BMD deficit compared to women (all p ≤ 0.002). After age adjustment, men who were tested due to fracture or glucocorticoid reasons had significantly greater BMD at the total hip (p ≤ 0.03). No further associations were seen after age adjustment between referral reason and BMD.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study presents the first data examining reasons for referral to DXA among Australians aged 20-49 years. Understanding health service utilisation regarding bone health in young adults is fundamental to understanding future risk, informing effective public health messages and raising awareness of osteoporosis.

Steroidal contraceptives: effect on bone fractures in women

BACKGROUND

Steroidal contraceptive use has been associated with changes in bone mineral density in women. Whether such changes increase the risk of fractures later in life is not clear. Osteoporosis is a major public health concern. Age-related decline in bone mass increases the risk of fracture, especially of the spine, hip, and wrist. Concern about bone health influences the recommendation and use of these effective contraceptives globally.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effect of using hormonal contraceptives before menopause on the risk of fracture in women

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched for studies of fracture or bone health and hormonal contraceptives in MEDLINE, POPLINE, CENTRAL, EMBASE, and LILACS, as well as ClinicalTrials.gov and ICTRP. We wrote to investigators to find additional trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were considered if they examined fractures, bone mineral density (BMD), or bone turnover in women with hormonal contraceptive use prior to menopause. Interventions could include comparing a hormonal contraceptive with a placebo or another hormonal contraceptive or could compare providing a supplement versus a placebo.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We assessed all titles and abstracts identified through the literature searches. Mean differences were computed using the inverse variance approach. For dichotomous outcomes, the Mantel-Haenszel odds ratio (OR) was calculated. Both included the 95% confidence interval (CI) and used a fixed-effect model. Due to different interventions, no trials could be combined for meta-analysis.

MAIN RESULTS

Of the 16 RCTs we found, 2 used a placebo and 1 used a non-hormonal method as the comparison, while 13 compared two hormonal contraceptives. No trial had fracture as an outcome. Most measured BMD and several assessed bone turnover. Depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) was associated with decreased bone mineral density. The placebo-controlled trials showed BMD increases for DMPA plus estrogen supplement and decreases for DMPA plus placebo. Combination contraceptives did not appear to negatively affect bone health, but none were placebo-controlled. For implants, the single-rod etonogestrel group showed a greater BMD decrease versus the two-rod levonorgestrel group. However, results were not consistent across all implant comparisons.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Whether steroidal contraceptives influence fracture risk cannot be determined from existing information. Many trials had small numbers of participants and some had large losses to follow up. Health care providers and women should consider the costs and benefits of these effective contraceptives. For example, injectable contraceptives and implants provide effective, long-term birth control yet do not involve a daily regimen. Progestin-only contraceptives are considered appropriate for women who should avoid estrogen due to medical conditions.

Oral contraceptive use and bone mass in women aged 26-36 years

INTRODUCTION

The association between hormonal contraceptive use and bone mineral density remains controversial.

HYPOTHESIS

Hormonal contraceptive use is positively associated with bone mass in young premenopausal women.

METHODS

Cross-sectional analysis of data collected from women aged 26-36 years (n = 687) in the Childhood Determinants of Adult Health study-a longitudinal study investigating childhood determinants of cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and other chronic diseases in adulthood. Participants were not currently pregnant or breast-feeding. Contraceptive use was obtained by self-administered questionnaire. Women were categorized as combined oral contraceptive users (n = 219), progestogen-only contraceptive users (n = 43), and non-users of hormonal contraceptives (n = 425). Bone mass was measured by quantitative ultrasound.

RESULTS

Compared with women who were not using any hormonal contraceptives, women using combined oral contraceptives had significantly higher values of broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA), speed of sound, and quantitative ultrasound index. These associations remained after adjustment for confounders. Progestogen-only contraceptive users had higher BUA than non-users, but the differences were not statistically significant in this small group.

CONCLUSION

Combined oral contraceptive use was associated with higher bone mass measured by quantitative ultrasound in this population-based sample of premenopausal women aged 26-36 while progestogen-only contraceptives appeared to have no deleterious effect on bone mass.

The effect of past use of oral contraceptive on bone mineral density, bone biochemical markers and muscle strength in healthy pre and post menopausal women

BACKGROUND

during adulthood, most studies have reported that oral contraceptive (OC) pills had neutral, or possibly beneficial effect on bone health. We proposed this study of pre and post menopausal women assessing BMD, bone biochemical markers and physical performance among OC past users and comparable women who have never use Ocs.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study comparing the bone density, bone biochemical markers (osteocalcin, CTX) and three measures to assess physical performance: timed get-up-and-go test "TGUG", five-times-sit-to-stand test "5 TSTS" and 8-feet speed walk "8 FSW" of users and never users OC. We were recruited 210 women who used OC for at least 2 years with that of 200 nonusers was carried out in pre and postmenopausal women (24-86 years).

RESULTS

when analysing the whole population, BMD and biochemical markers values were similar for Ocs past users and control subjects. However when analysing the subgroup of premenopausal women, there was a statistically significant difference between users and never-users in osteocalcin (15,5 +/- 7 ng/ml vs 21,6 +/- 9 ng/ml; p = 0,003) and CTX (0,30 +/- 0,1 ng/ml vs 0,41 +/- 0,2 ng/ml; p = 0,025). This difference persisted after adjustment for age, BMI, age at menarche and number of pregnancies. In contrast, in post menopausal women, there was no difference in bone biochemical markers between OC users and the control. On the other hand OC past users had a significant greater performance than did the never users group. And when analysing the physical performance tests by quartile OC duration we found a significant negative association between the three tests and the use of OC more than 10 years.

CONCLUSION

the funding show no evidence of a significant difference in BMD between Ocs users and never user control groups, a decrease in bone turn over in OC pre menopausal users and a greater physical performances in patients who used OC up than 10 years.

Steroidal contraceptives: effect on bone fractures in women

BACKGROUND

Steroidal contraceptive use has been associated with changes in bone mineral density in women. Whether such changes increase the risk of fractures later in life is not clear. However, osteoporosis is a major public health concern. Age-related decline in bone mass increases the risk of fracture, especially of the spine, hip, and wrist. Concern about bone health influences the recommendation and use of these effective contraceptives globally.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effect of using hormonal contraceptives before menopause on the risk of fracture in women

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched for studies of fracture or bone health and hormonal contraceptives in MEDLINE, POPLINE, CENTRAL, EMBASE, and LILACS, as well as in clinical trials databases (ClinicalTrials.gov and ICTRP). We wrote to investigators to find additional trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized controlled trials were considered if they examined fractures, bone mineral density (BMD), or bone turnover in women with hormonal contraceptive use prior to menopause. Studies were excluded if hormones were provided for treatment of a specific condition rather than for contraception. Interventions could include comparisons of a hormonal contraceptive with a placebo or with another hormonal contraceptive. Interventions could also include the provision of a supplement versus a placebo.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We assessed for inclusion all titles and abstracts identified through the literature searches with no language limitation. The mean difference was computed with 95% confidence interval (CI) using a fixed-effect model.

MAIN RESULTS

We found 13 RCTs, 2 of which used a placebo. No trial had fracture as an outcome but most measured BMD. Combination contraceptives did not appear to affect bone health. Of progestin-only methods, depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) was associated with decreased bone mineral density, while results were inconsistent for implants. The two placebo-controlled trials showed BMD increases for DMPA plus estrogen supplement and decreases for DMPA plus placebo.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Whether steroidal contraceptives influence fracture risk cannot be determined from existing information. Due to different interventions, no trials could be combined for meta-analysis. Many trials had small numbers of participants and some had large losses to follow up. Health care providers and women should consider the costs and benefits of these effective contraceptives. For example, injectable contraceptives and implants provide effective, long-term birth control yet do not involve a daily regimen. Progestin-only contraceptives are considered appropriate for women who should avoid estrogen due to medical conditions.

Multigenerational exposure to ethinyl estradiol affects bone geometry, but not bone mineral density in rats

Estrogenic compounds are known to prevent bone loss in ovariectomized adult rats; however, their effects on bone in developing and reproductively-intact rats are less well-understood. In a large multigenerational experiment 0, 2, 10, or 50 ppb ethinyl estradiol (EE) in the diet was fed to intact male and female rats from conception until either weaning, postnatal day 140, or continuously for 2 years. Vertebrae (lumbar and caudal) and femurs were collected from subsets of these animals at necropsy at 48 days, 70 days, 140 days, or 2 years of age and subjected to dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scanning to measure bone mineral density (BMD), bone mineral content (BMC), and bone area. In addition, the length, cross-sectional area, marrow area, and cortical bone area of the femurs were measured directly in all animals at PND 140 and 2 years. Continuous dietary intake of 50 ppb EE decreased body weight by 8-27%. BMD adjusted for body weight was not affected by EE, with the exception of an increase in the caudal vertebrae in males treated with 50 ppb EE. In female rats, continuous treatment with 50 ppb EE decreased length and cross-sectional area of the femur. The length of the femur was decreased in the first two generations following institution of a phytoestrogen-free diet at the initiation of the study in all animals, including controls, but returned to the original length by the third or fourth generation. The cross-sectional area of the femur also varied by generation. In conclusion, a high dose of EE throughout the lifespan resulted in decreased bone size in females, which could reduce the force required to break the bone. Furthermore, dietary changes may have epigenetic effects which persist for multiple generations.

Estrogen-progestin contraceptive use during adolescence prevents bone mass acquisition: a 4-year follow-up study

BACKGROUND

Estrogen-progestin contraception may affect estrogen production and alter the development of peak bone mass.

STUDY DESIGN

A 4-year follow-up with 122 adolescent women aged 12-19 years. The data were divided into three groups based on estrogen-progestin contraceptive (EPC) use: (i) nonusers (n=52), (ii) 1-2 years of use (n=24) and (iii) use for more than 2 years (n=46). The estrogen dose of the preparations was < or =35 mcg. Height, weight, and the amount of exercise (ratio of work metabolic rate, h/week) as well as bone mineral content (BMC) of lumbar spine and femoral neck were measured repeatedly.

RESULTS

There was a significant trend showing less of an increase in the mean adjusted BMC of lumbar spine in the group of adolescent women who had used EPC for more than 2 years compared with the two other groups. In the mean adjusted BMC of the femoral neck, there was a significant trend of a smaller increase in EPC users for more than 2 years compared with 1-2 years of use.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term EPC with low-dose estrogen preparations seems to suppress normal bone mineral accrual in adolescent women.

Steroidal contraceptives: effect on bone fractures in women

BACKGROUND

Steroidal contraceptive use has been associated with changes in bone mineral density in women. Whether such changes increase the risk of fractures later in life is not clear. However, osteoporosis is a major public health concern. Age-related decline in bone mass increases the risk of fracture, especially of the spine, hip, and wrist. Concern about bone health influences the recommendation and use of these effective contraceptives globally.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effect of using hormonal contraceptives before menopause on the risk of fracture in women

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched MEDLINE, POPLINE, CENTRAL, EMBASE, and LILACS for studies of fracture or bone health and hormonal contraceptives. We wrote to investigators to find additional trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized controlled trials were considered if they examined fractures, bone mineral density (BMD), or bone turnover in women with hormonal contraceptive use prior to menopause. Studies were excluded if hormones were provided for treatment of a specific condition rather than for contraception. Interventions could include comparisons of a hormonal contraceptive with a placebo or with another hormonal contraceptive. Interventions could also include the provision of a supplement versus a placebo.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We assessed for inclusion all titles and abstracts identified through the literature searches with no language limitation. The weighted mean difference (WMD) was computed with 95% confidence interval (CI) using a fixed-effect model.

MAIN RESULTS

No trial had fracture as an outcome. Combination contraceptives did not appear to affect bone health. Of progestin-only methods, depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) was associated with decreased bone mineral density, while results were inconsistent for implants. The two placebo-controlled trials showed BMD increases for DMPA plus estrogen supplement and decreases for DMPA plus placebo.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Whether steroidal contraceptives influence fracture risk cannot be determined from existing information. Due to different interventions, no trials could be combined for meta-analysis. Many trials had small numbers of participants and some had large losses to follow up. Health care providers and women should consider the costs and benefits of these effective contraceptives. For example, injectable contraceptives and implants provide effective, long-term birth control yet do not involve a daily regimen. Progestin-only contraceptives are considered appropriate for women who should avoid estrogen due to medical conditions.

Osteoporosis in premenopause. When are screening and treatment prudent?

Osteoporosis is considered a disorder of postmenopausal women because bone mineral loss and accompanying fragility fractures are common in this group. However, certain premenopausal women are also at risk for osteoporosis. Because of a lack of screening and treatment guidelines for premenopausal women, it can be difficult to determine whether a low bone mineral density correlates with a disease such as osteoporosis and to predict the potential risk of a fracture and formulate the correct course of action. In this article, Dr Derk identifies high-risk groups, presents an approach to judicious screening, and recommends prevention and treatment strategies.

Combined hormonal contraception and bone health: a systematic review

This systematic review examined whether women who use combined hormonal contraception experience changes in risk of fracture or bone mineral density (BMD) that differ from nonusers. We identified 86 articles from PubMed and EMBASE (published 1966 to August 2005) that reported on fracture or BMD outcomes by use of combined hormonal contraceptives. The evidence relating to combined oral contraceptives (COCs) and fracture is inconclusive, as results from the available studies conflict. Studies of adolescent and young adult women generally found lower BMD among COC users than nonusers. Evidence for premenopausal adult women suggested no differences in BMD between COC users and nonusers. COC use in perimenopausal and postmenopausal women preserved bone mass, while nonusers lost BMD, but BMD among former COC users in this age group was the same as for never-users. Evidence for other combined hormonal methods was very limited, with one study indicating no effect of combined hormonal injectable use among premenopausal women on BMD and one study suggesting lower BMD among premenopausal users of the NuvaRing than in nonusers.

Effect of oral contraceptives and hormone replacement therapy on bone mineral density in premenopausal and perimenopausal women: a systematic review

Seventy five articles on the effect of oral contraceptives and other hormone replacement on bone density in premenopausal and perimenopausal women were reviewed. The evidence was appraised using the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine levels of evidence. There is good evidence for a positive effect of oral contraceptives on bone density in perimenopausal women, and fair evidence for a positive effect in "hypothalamic" oligo/amenorrhoeic premenopausal women. There is limited evidence for a positive effect in healthy and anorexic premenopausal women. In hypothalamic oligo/amenorrhoeic women, baseline bone density has been shown to be significantly lower than that in healthy controls, therefore the decision to treat is clinically more important. The ideal formulation(s) and duration of treatment remain to be determined by further longitudinal and prospective randomised controlled trials in larger subject populations.

Prior oral contraception and postmenopausal fracture: a Women's Health Initiative observational cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To test for the possible association of past oral contraceptive (OC) use and incident fracture after menopause.

DESIGN

A prospective cohort of 93,725 postmenopausal women.

SETTING

Forty Women's Health Initiative (WHI) clinical centers across the United States.

PATIENT(S)

Ethnically diverse 93,725 volunteer postmenopausal women, 50 to 79 years old.

INTERVENTION(S)

None.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

The main outcome was self-reported incident first fracture assessed prospectively by annual questionnaire.

RESULT(S)

The adjusted relative hazard (HR) for fracture among past OC users was 1.07 (95% CI, 1.01-1.15). Among women without any postmenopausal hormone treatment, past OC use for < or =5 years led to an HR of 1.15 (95% CI, 1.04-1.27) and for past OC use >5 years led to an HR of 1.09 (95% CI, 0.97-1.23) compared with never users.

CONCLUSION(S)

This study does not support the idea that past OC use protects against later fracture.

Oral contraceptive use in young women is associated with lower bone mineral density than that of controls

Osteoporosis is a skeletal disease affecting 44 million Americans. A primary strategy to prevent osteoporosis is to develop a high peak bone mass in youth. Oral contraceptives (OCs) alter hormones in women and could affect bone mass development. Fifty percent of American women between the ages of 20 and 24 years use OCs. However, the interaction between OCs and skeletal mineralization is poorly understood. Our aim was to compare bone mass [bone mineral density (BMD)] of young women who had a history of OC use, with regularly menstruating controls. We recruited 98 women who were 18 to 25 years of age and had a history of OC use (n=44, 3.4+/-1.9 years of OC use) and controls (n=58). BMD at the hip, whole-body, and spine [anterior-posterior (AP) and lateral grams per square centimeter] was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Physical activity [in metabolic equivalents (METs)] was measured via questionnaire, and grip strength was evaluated with an isometric dynamometer. Groups were similar in body mass index (BMI), fat mass, grip strength, calcium intake and physical activity, but OC users were slightly older than controls (21.3+/-1.9 years vs 20.3+/-1.6 years, P<0.05). In analysis of covariance, controlled for age and BMI, controls had significantly greater BMD than OC users at the AP and lateral spine, femoral neck, greater trochanter, total hip, and whole body (P<0.05). We conclude that, in this cross-sectional analysis, oral contraceptive use by young women may compromise bone health during a time when mineral is still accruing.

Effect of oral contraceptive treatment on bone mass acquisition in skeletally immature young female rats

The objective of the present study was to investigate the effect of oral contraceptive (OC) treatment on bone mass accrual in skeletally immature young female rats. Animals in the baseline group were killed at the beginning of the experiment and were subjected to bone density assessment by peripheral quantitative computerized tomography (pQCT). The control group was fed a base diet free of phytoestrogens, while animals in the contraceptive group received the same base diet mixed with 2.67 microg desogestrel/100 g body weight and 0.0533 microg ethinyl estradiol/100 g body weight. The duration of the treatment period was 16 weeks. Densitometric measurements by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry and serum bone markers assessment were carried out at baseline, at 8 weeks and at 16 weeks, while pQCT densitometry took place after sacrifice. All bone mineral density and bone mineral content indices measured by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry increased significantly throughout the study period in both the OC and control group. Concerning pQCT measurements, animals in both the OC and the control group had significantly higher cortical density compared with baseline (midtibia: p=.0003 and .0003, respectively). Total area and periosteal circumference were significantly higher in OC group, both in proximal (p=.003 and .003, respectively) and midtibia (p=.048 and .042, respectively) compared with baseline. Osteoprotegerin serum levels increased in both groups, and at the end of the experiment, circulating osteoprotegerin was significantly higher in the OC group compared with controls (p=.032). At the end of the experiment, carboxyl-terminal telopeptides of collagen type I levels were significantly lower in the OC-treated animals compared with controls (p=.046). Our results suggest that OC administration to skeletally immature female rats allows normal bone accrual and may even improve bone geometry. This effect may be mediated through enhanced inhibition of bone resorption.

Premenopausal bone health assessment

The World Health Organization criteria for classification of bone mineral density (BMD) cannot be applied to premenopausal women because the relationship between BMD and fracture risk is not the same as in postmenopausal women. Approximately 2.5% of premenopausal women have BMD that is more than 2.0 standard deviations below the mean BMD of an age-, gender-, and ethnicity-matched reference population. Most premenopausal women with low BMD have low peak bone mass and low 5- to 10-year probability of fracture. The management of these patients involves nonpharmacologic lifestyle measures and reassurances that fracture risk is low. A minority of premenopausal women with low BMD have significant elevation of fracture risk, usually a result of contributing diseases, conditions, or medications that may be identified and treated. Premenopausal women with fractures are at increased risk for postmenopausal osteoporosis and fractures later in life.

Depot medroxyprogesterone acetate, oral contraceptives and bone mineral density in a cohort of adolescent girls

PURPOSE

To conduct a longitudinal comparison of bone mineral density (BMD) in 370 adolescent girls, aged 12-18, who self-selected depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) or an oral contraceptive (OC) containing 20 microg ethinyl estradiol/100 microg levonorgestrel with that in girls who received no hormonal treatment (control group).

METHODS

Lumbar spine and femoral neck BMD measurements were obtained by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry at baseline and 12 months. Data were analyzed with repeated measures analysis of covariance methods.

RESULTS

Over 12 months, lumbar spine BMD decreased in the DMPA group (n = 29), with a mean percent change of -1.4% (95% confidence interval [CI] -2.73, -0.10), and increased by a mean of 3.8% (95% CI 3.11, 4.57) in the control group [n = 107 (p < .001)]. The increase in mean percent change in lumbar spine BMD in the OC group (n = 79), 2.3% (95% CI 1.49, 3.18), was significantly smaller than in the control group (p = .03). Over 12 months, the mean percent change in femoral neck BMD was -2.2% (95% CI -3.95, -0.39) in the DMPA group, but increased 2.3% (95% CI 1.29, 3.27) in the control group (p < .001). The increase in mean percent change at the femoral neck in the OC group, 0.3% (95% CI -0.87, 1.41), was significantly lower than in the control group (p = .03).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study contributes to an increasing body of knowledge indicating a negative impact of DMPA on bone health in young women. Additional findings suggest a potential adverse effect of an OC containing 20 microg ethinyl estradiol/100 microg levonorgestrel on bone health in adolescents.

Low bone mineral density in premenopausal women

With the proliferation of bone densitometers, an increasing number of premenopausal women are having their bone density tested. Approximately 15% of premenopausal women have bone mineral density that is more than 1 standard deviation less than the young-adult mean, and approximately 0.6% are more than 2.5 standard deviation below young-adult mean bone density. Most premenopausal women with low bone density have low peak bone mass, stable bone density, and low short-term absolute risk of fracture. The management of these patients involves nonpharmacologic lifestyle measures and reassurances that fracture risk is low. A minority of premenopausal women with low bone density have increased short-term absolute fracture risk with contributing diseases, conditions, or medications that should be identified and treated. Premenopausal women with fractures are at increased risk for fractures later in life. Methods for evaluating these patients and selecting those who require additional care are reviewed.

Safety concerns and health benefits associated with oral contraception

Since the introduction of hormonal contraceptives in the 1960s, there have been a variety of both health benefits and safety concerns attributed to their use. In most instances, the noncontraceptive benefits of oral contraceptives (OCs) outweigh the potential cardiovascular risks. In fact, the probability of a patient experiencing a cardiovascular event while taking a low-dose OC is very low. However, smoking, hypertension, obesity, and diabetes are risk factors that must be taken into account when prescribing OCs. The neoplastic effects of hormonal contraceptives have been extensively studied, and recent meta-analyses indicate that there is a reduction in the risk of endometrial and ovarian cancer, a possible small increase in the risk for breast and cervical cancer, and an increased risk of liver cancer. Finally, many women will experience noncontraceptive health benefits with OCs that expand far beyond pregnancy prevention. Some of these benefits include reduction in menstrual-related symptoms, fewer ectopic pregnancies, a possible increase in bone density, and possible protection against pelvic inflammatory disease.

Bone mineral density in adolescent and young adult women on injectable or oral contraception

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This report critically reviews recent original research articles that pertain to bone mineral density in young adult women utilizing injectable depot medroxyprogesterone acetate or oral contraceptives.

RECENT FINDINGS

Some evidence indicates that depot medroxyprogesterone acetate and ultra-low dose oral contraceptives (containing 20 microg ethinyl estradiol) may interfere with the large increases normally observed in adolescence; however, the same degree of bone loss (or lack of bone gain) associated with these drugs is not so impressive in young adult women who would typically be experiencing small changes in bone mass. Data obtained from young adult women show that low dose (30-40 microg ethinyl estradiol) oral contraceptives seem to be more protective of bone than ultra-low dose oral contraceptives. The few extant data suggest that there may be substantial increases in bone mass after discontinuation of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate; no information is available regarding the response of bone after discontinuation of oral contraceptives. As the clinical risk for fracture is usually several decades later, several exogenous factors such as diet and exercise may exert overriding influences on later bone health. Moreover, without contraception, the clinical outcome may be unwanted pregnancy and its potential impact on bone health.

SUMMARY

Recent findings suggest that depot medroxyprogesterone acetate and ultra-low dose oral contraceptives may interfere with achieving optimal peak bone mass in very young women; however, there may be substantial recovery after cessation of these methods and overriding long-term influences on bone health imposed by a myriad of lifestyle factors.

The menopausal transition: characteristics and management

The menopausal transition is a complex period in a woman's life, reflecting ovarian ageing and concomitant hormonal changes, in addition to social and metabolic changes. These changes, in turn, influence the signs and symptoms common to this period. Symptoms which are influenced by the hormonal fluctuations occurring during the menopausal transition include vasomotor symptoms and vaginal dryness; others are breast tenderness, poor sleep and pre-menstrual dysphoria. Hormonal therapy has been shown to be first-line therapy for many of these symptoms. Other types of pharmacotherapies may be helpful, including selective serotonergic uptake inhibitors for vasomotor symptoms. Characteristic signs of the menopausal transition include abnormal uterine bleeding, best managed with hormonal pharmacotherapy; diminishing bone mineral density, which may warrant diagnostic intervention, and may benefit from dietary and lifestyle modifications; and increased body-mass index and worsening lipid profile, which also may benefit from dietary and lifestyle modifications.

Efficacy of a low-dose oral contraceptive containing 20 microg of ethinyl estradiol and 100 microg of levonorgestrel for the treatment of moderate acne: A randomized, placebo-controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Acne is a multifactorial disease in which androgens appear to play an important role. A low-dose oral contraceptive containing 20 microg of ethinyl estradiol and 100 microg of levonorgestrel (EE/LNG) has been shown to improve biochemical markers of androgenicity. Lowering bioavailable androgens may improve acne.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a low-dose oral contraceptive containing 20 microg of EE and 100 microg of LNG for the treatment of moderate acne.

METHODS

In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial, healthy female subjects (n = 371; >/=14 years old) with regular menstrual cycles and moderate facial acne were randomly assigned to receive EE/LNG or placebo for 6 cycles of 28 days. Acne lesion counts and clinician global assessment were performed at the end of each cycle. Patient self-assessments were collected and biochemical markers of androgenicity were also measured.

RESULTS

At the end of the study, the number of inflammatory and total lesions was significantly lower with EE/LNG compared with placebo (P <.05). Patients in the EE/LNG group also had significantly better scores for clinician global and patient self-assessments than those in the placebo group (P <.05). Biochemical markers of androgenicity improved during EE/LNG treatment compared with placebo and baseline values.

CONCLUSION

A low-dose oral contraceptive containing EE/LNG is effective and safe for the treatment of moderate acne.

Using a low-dose contraceptive in women 35 years of age and over: 20 microg estradiol/100 microg levonorgestrel

The efficacy, safety, and cycle control of a low-dose oral contraceptive (OC) containing 20 microg ethinyl estradiol (EE) and 100 microg levonorgestrel (LNG) has been demonstrated in a large trial with 1708 women (>or=15 years old with regular menstrual cycles). The objective of this study was to analyze the same parameters in 218 of the 1708 women who were 35 years of age and older. Women were administered the 28-day, combination OC (20 microg EE/100 microg LNG; 21 days active medication/7 days placebo) for up to 3 years. During 3859 cycles evaluated for efficacy, one pregnancy occurred (Pearl index 0.34). The most common adverse events cited as reasons for discontinuation were hypertension (3% of subjects), headache (2%), and metrorrhagia (2%). One subject withdrew as a result of a serious adverse event. Breakthrough bleeding, spotting, and bleeding and spotting occurred in 2.9%, 11.0%, and 6.8%, respectively, of the 3739 cycles evaluated for cycle control. This low-dose, monophasic regimen of 20 microg EE/100 microg LNG is an effective, safe, and tolerable contraceptive and provides good cycle control for women 35 years of age and older.

Oral contraceptives: an update on health benefits and risks

OBJECTIVE

To review the health benefits and risks of oral contraceptives, with an emphasis on emerging noncontraceptive benefits and the pharmacist's role in promoting safe and effective use of these widely prescribed medications.

DATA SOURCES

Published articles identified through MEDLINE (1995-2001) using the search terms oral contraception, neoplasms, cardiovascular disease, menstrual cycle, and other pertinent subject headings. Additional articles and books were identified from the bibliographies of the retrieved articles.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Combined oral contraceptives (COCs), which contain synthetic estrogen and progestin, are the second most common form of birth control for women after sterilization. When taken properly, COCs are highly effective, with a pregnancy rate of 0.1% among perfect users. Also, a growing body of evidence points to multiple noncontraceptive benefits of COCs, including protection from several types of cancer and a variety of gynecologic benefits, such as reduced menstrual bleeding irregularities and fewer ectopic pregnancies. COCs are one of the most studied classes of medications, and they have been found to have an excellent safety profile in nonsmoking healthy women. They may be used continuously until menopause. For women with coexisting medical conditions or other special circumstances, the risks and benefits of COCs must be carefully evaluated before use.

CONCLUSION

More than 40 years after their introduction, COCs remain the leading form of hormonal contraception. By assessing patients' contraceptive needs, evaluating their risk factors, and providing sensitive and thorough counseling, pharmacists can help ensure the safe and effective use of these medications.

Current perspectives on oral contraceptive use

Oral contraceptives are one of the most highly effective forms of contraception and provide many short- and long-term noncontraceptive health benefits. They control menstrual cycle irregularities, such as breakthrough bleeding and amenorrhea, and are effective in treating dysfunctional uterine bleeding. In addition, for decades after oral contraceptive use is discontinued they are associated with substantial decreases in the risk of ovarian cancer (up to 80%) and of endometrial cancer (40%-50%), and nearly eliminate benign functional ovarian cysts. Long-term oral contraceptive use confers protection against benign breast disease and colorectal cancer, may help prevent rheumatoid arthritis, decreases ectopic pregnancy and hospitalizations for pelvic inflammatory disease, and helps preserve bone mineral density to reduce risk of fractures. Large bodies of evidence from extensive research have clarified the perceived association of oral contraceptive use with cardiovascular disease and with breast cancer. Findings indicate that there is no increased risk of myocardial infarction or stroke associated with oral contraceptive use in healthy, nonsmoking, normotensive women. Although there is a 3- to 4-fold increased risk of venous thromboembolism with current oral contraceptive use, the absolute risk is very small and is half that associated with pregnancy. Women of all reproductive ages, including perimenopausal women, can realize many health benefits through oral contraceptive use, including improved health status later in life.

Selection of oral contraceptives or hormone replacement therapy: patient communication and counseling issues

Oral contraceptives and combination hormone replacement therapy are underused by most women. Among users, lack of compliance/adherence to oral contraceptive or hormone replacement therapy regimens can lead to discontinuation and deprive women of the full range of benefits achieved through hormone continuity. To prevent unintended pregnancy and to improve the health outcomes of women of all ages and the overall quality of life, adherence and continuation rates need to be improved for oral contraceptive and hormone replacement therapy use. Effective communication and counseling during the oral contraceptive and hormone replacement therapy regimen selection process and subsequent follow-up interactions are essential. Patients need to be informed in a clear and concise manner that, for most women, the benefits of oral contraceptives and hormone replacement therapy outweigh any associated health risks. Data should be presented without epidemiologic jargon and in terms that are easily understood. It is recommended that realistic expectations concerning the possible side effects, especially during the initial use of hormones, are established before use; furthermore, the selection of a formulation should take into account the unique needs of each patient.

The emerging use of the 20-microg oral contraceptive

OBJECTIVE

To highlight studies that investigated the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of low-dose oral contraceptives (OCs) containing 20 microg of ethinyl estradiol (EE) and to discuss the use of these low-dose contraceptives in women from adolescence to menopause and the noncontraceptive health benefits likely to be afforded by low-dose contraceptives.

DESIGN

Relevant literature was identified by searching MEDLINE and EMBASE. Other sources were located by consulting the bibliographies of the material collected from Medline and EMBASE. Sources for additional information included documents from the United States Food and Drug Administration and the Physicians' Desk Reference (54th ed.).

CONCLUSION(S)

The current lowest available dose of EE used for OCs in the United States is 20 microg. Formulations with 20 microg of EE are efficacious and have a low incidence of estrogen-related side effects. Since this lowest effective EE dose inhibits ovarian activity, 20 microg of EE should also provide the noncontraceptive health benefits of OCs. Both contraceptive and noncontraceptive benefits of OCs are available to most women from adolescence to menopause without complications.

Hormone replacement therapy and fractures in older adults

Estrogen deficiency in women is associated with accelerated bone loss, and estrogen replacement therapy has been proven to be effective in preventing osteoporosis and fractures in postmenopausal women. The introduction of selective estrogen receptor modulators that have an estrogen-like effect on the skeleton but have a different pattern of effects on other tissues may have an important role in the management of osteoporosis in women in the near future. In men, androgen deficiency has been shown to be associated with osteoporosis. Although androgen replacement in hypogonadal men may decrease bone resorption and increase bone mass, long-term placebo-controlled trials are needed to better define the benefits and risks of such therapy before it can be recommended. Sex hormone deficiency is linked to the development of osteoporosis in both women and men. In women, hormonal replacement by estrogen or the newly developed selective estrogen receptor modulators may prevent the development of osteoporosis and its related fractures. In men, there is early evidence that testosterone replacement therapy may enhance bone mass in hypogonadal men.