Treatment of menorrhagia with meclofenamate sodium

Variation of outcome reporting in studies of interventions for heavy menstrual bleeding: a systematic review

Background: Heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) detrimentally effects women. It is important to be able to compare treatments and synthesise data to understand which interventions are most beneficial, however, when there is variation in outcome reporting, this is difficult. Objectives: To identify variation in reported outcomes in clinical studies of interventions for HMB. Materials and methods: Searches were performed in medical databases and trial registries, using the terms ‘heavy menstrual bleeding’, menorrhagia*, hypermenorrhoea*, HMB, “heavy period „period“, effective*, therapy*, treatment, intervention, manage* and associated MeSH terms. Two authors independently reviewed and selected citations according to pre-defined selection criteria, including both randomised and observational studies. The following data were extracted- study characteristics, methodology and quality, and all reported outcomes. Analysis considered the frequency of reporting. Results: There were 14 individual primary outcomes, however reporting was varied, resulting in 45 specific primary outcomes. There were 165 specific secondary outcomes. The most reported outcomes were menstrual blood loss and adverse events. Conclusions: A core outcome set (COS) would reduce the evident variation in reporting of outcomes in studies of HMB, allowing more complete combination and comparison of study results and preventing reporting bias. What is new? This in-depth review of past research into heavy menstrual bleeding shows that there is the need for a core outcome set for heavy menstrual bleeding.

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for heavy menstrual bleeding

BACKGROUND

Heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) is an important cause of ill health in premenopausal women. Although surgery is often used as a treatment, a range of medical therapies are also available. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) reduce prostaglandin levels, which are elevated in women with excessive menstrual bleeding and also may have a beneficial effect on dysmenorrhoea.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effectiveness, safety and tolerability of NSAIDs in achieving a reduction in menstrual blood loss (MBL) in women of reproductive years with HMB.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched, in April 2019, the Cochrane Gynaecology and Fertility specialised register, Cochrane Central Register of Studies Online (CENTRAL CRSO), MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, the clinical trial registries and reference lists of articles.

SELECTION CRITERIA

The inclusion criteria were randomised comparisons of individual NSAIDs or combined with other medical therapy with each other, placebo or other medical treatments in women with regular heavy periods measured either objectively or subjectively and with no pathological or iatrogenic (treatment-induced) causes for their HMB.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We identified 19 randomised controlled trials (RCTs) (759 women) that fulfilled the inclusion criteria for this review and two review authors independently extracted data. We estimated odds ratios (ORs) for dichotomous outcomes and mean differences (MDs) for continuous outcomes from the data of nine trials. We described in data tables the results of the remaining seven cross-over trials with data unsuitable for pooling, one trial with skewed data, and one trial with missing variances. One trial had no data available for analysis.

MAIN RESULTS

As a group, NSAIDs were more effective than placebo at reducing HMB but less effective than tranexamic acid, danazol or the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG IUS). Treatment with danazol caused a shorter duration of menstruation and more adverse events than NSAIDs, but this did not appear to affect the acceptability of treatment, based on trials from 1980 to 1990. However, currently danazol is not a usual or recommended treatment for HMB. There was no clear evidence of difference between NSAIDs and the other treatments (oral luteal progestogen, ethamsylate, an older progesterone-releasing intrauterine system and the oral contraceptive pill (OCP), but most studies were underpowered. There was no evidence of a difference between the individual NSAIDs (naproxen and mefenamic acid) in reducing HMB. The evidence quality ranged from low to moderate, the main limitations being risk of bias and imprecision.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

NSAIDs reduce HMB when compared with placebo, but are less effective than tranexamic acid, danazol or LNG IUS. However, adverse events are more severe with danazol therapy. In the limited number of small studies suitable for evaluation, there was no clear evidence of a difference in efficacy between NSAIDs and other medical treatments such as oral luteal progestogen, ethamsylate, OCP or the older progesterone-releasing intrauterine system.

The role of hollow magnetic nanoparticles in drug delivery

The increasing number of scientific publications focusing on nanomaterials in the biomedical field indicates growing interest from the broader scientific community. Nanomedicine is a modern science, and research continues into the application of nanoscale materials for the therapy and diagnosis of damaged tissues. In this regard, substantial progress has been made in the synthesis of magnetic materials with desired sizes, morphologies, chemical compositions, and surface chemistry. Among these, magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles have demonstrated great promise as unique carriers in the delivery of chemical drugs due to their combinations of hollow structures. Importantly, due to the combination of the ability to respond to an external magnetic field and the rich possibilities of their coatings, magnetic materials are universal tools for the magnetic separation of small molecules, biomolecules, and cells. This review provides an overview of the synthesis and biological applications of hollow magnetic nanoparticles in drug delivery systems.

The increasing number of scientific publications focusing on nanomaterials in the biomedical field indicates growing interest from the broader scientific community.

The medical management of abnormal uterine bleeding in reproductive-aged women

In the treatment of women with abnormal uterine bleeding, once a thorough history, physical examination, and indicated imaging studies are performed and all significant structural causes are excluded, medical management is the first-line approach. Determining the acuity of the bleeding, the patient's medical history, assessing risk factors, and establishing a diagnosis will individualize their medical regimen. In acute abnormal uterine bleeding with a normal uterus, parenteral estrogen, a multidose combined oral contraceptive regimen, a multidose progestin-only regimen, and tranexamic acid are all viable options, given the appropriate clinical scenario. Heavy menstrual bleeding can be treated with a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system, combined oral contraceptives, continuous oral progestins, and tranexamic acid with high efficacy. Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs may be utilized with hormonal methods and tranexamic acid to decrease menstrual bleeding. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists are indicated in patients with leiomyoma and abnormal uterine bleeding in preparation for surgical interventions. In women with inherited bleeding disorders all hormonal methods as well as tranexamic acid can be used to treat abnormal uterine bleeding. Women on anticoagulation therapy should consider using progestin-only methods as well as a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist to treat their heavy menstrual bleeding. Given these myriad options for medical treatment of abnormal uterine bleeding, many patients may avoid surgical intervention.

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for heavy menstrual bleeding

BACKGROUND

Heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) is an important cause of ill health in premenopausal women. Although surgery is often used as a treatment, a range of medical therapies are also available. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) reduce prostaglandin levels, which are elevated in women with excessive menstrual bleeding and also may have a beneficial effect on dysmenorrhoea.

OBJECTIVES

The primary objective of this review was to investigate the effectiveness of NSAIDs in achieving a reduction in menstrual blood loss in women of reproductive years with HMB.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Menstrual Disorders & Subfertility Group trials register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL in July 2012 and reference lists of articles. We also contacted manufacturers and researchers in the field.

SELECTION CRITERIA

The inclusion criteria were randomised comparisons of individual NSAIDs or combined with other medical therapy with either each other, placebo or other medical treatments in women with regular heavy periods measured either objectively or subjectively and with no pathological or iatrogenic (treatment-induced) causes for their heavy menstrual blood loss.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Eighteen RCTs were identified that fulfilled the inclusion criteria for this review and data were extracted independently. Odds ratios for dichotomous outcomes and weighted mean differences for continuous outcomes were estimated from the data of nine trials. The results of the remaining seven cross-over trials with data unsuitable for pooling, one trial with skewed data and one trial with missing variances were described in data tables.

MAIN RESULTS

As a group, NSAIDs were more effective than placebo at reducing HMB but less effective than either tranexamic acid, danazol or the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG IUS). Treatment with danazol caused a shorter duration of menstruation and more adverse events than NSAIDs but this did not appear to affect the acceptability of treatment. There were no statistically significant differences between NSAIDs and the other treatments (oral luteal progestogen, ethamsylate, an older progesterone-releasing intrauterine system (Progestasert), oral contraceptive pill (OCC)) but most studies were underpowered. There was no evidence of a difference between the individual NSAIDs (naproxen and mefenamic acid) in reducing HMB.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

NSAIDs reduce HMB when compared with placebo but are less effective than tranexamic acid, danazol or LNG IUS. However, adverse events are more severe with danazol therapy. In the limited number of small studies suitable for evaluation, no significant difference in efficacy was demonstrated between NSAIDs and other medical treatments such as oral luteal progestogen, ethamsylate, OCC or another type of intrauterine system, Progestasert.

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for heavy menstrual bleeding

BACKGROUND

Heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) is an important cause of ill health in premenopausal women. Although surgery is often used as a treatment, a range of medical therapies are also available. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs reduce prostaglandin levels which are elevated in women with excessive menstrual bleeding and also may have a beneficial effect on dysmenorrhoea.

OBJECTIVES

The primary objective of this review was to investigate the effectiveness of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in achieving a reduction in menstrual blood loss in women of reproductive years HMB.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Menstrual Disorders & Subfertility Group trials register (searched April 2007), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library, Issue 1, 2007), MEDLINE (1966 to April 2007), EMBASE (1985 to April 2007), CINAHL (1982 to April 2007), Current Contents (1993 to April 2007) and reference lists of articles. We also contacted manufacturers and researchers in the field.

SELECTION CRITERIA

The inclusion criteria were randomised comparisons of individual NSAIDs with either each other, placebo or other medical treatments in women with regular heavy periods measured either objectively or subjectively and with no pathological or iatrogenic (treatment induced) causes for their heavy menstrual blood loss.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Seventeen RCTs were identified that fulfilled the inclusion criteria for this review and data were extracted independently. Odds ratios for dichotomous outcomes and weighted mean differences for continuous outcomes were estimated from the data of nine trials. The results of the remaining seven crossover trials with data unsuitable for pooling and one trial with skewed data were described in the Other Data section.

MAIN RESULTS

As a group, NSAIDs were more effective than placebo at reducing heavy menstrual bleeding but less effective than either tranexamic acid, danazol or the levonorgestrel releasing intrauterine system (LNG IUS). Treatment with danazol caused a shorter duration of menstruation and more adverse events than NSAIDs but this did not appear to affect the acceptability of treatment. There were no statistically significant differences between NSAIDs and the other treatments (oral luteal progestogen, ethamsylate, an older progesterone releasing intra-uterine system (Progestasert), oral contraceptive pill (OCC)) but most studies were underpowered. There was no evidence of a difference between the individual NSAIDs (naproxen and mefenamic acid) in reducing HMB.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

NSAIDs reduce HMB when compared with placebo but are less effective than either tranexamic acid, danazol or LNG IUS. However, adverse events are more severe with danazol therapy. In the limited number of small studies suitable for evaluation, no significant difference in efficacy was demonstrated between NSAIDs and other medical treatments such as oral luteal progestogen, ethamsylate, OCC or another type of IUS, Progestasert.

Medical Therapies for Chronic Menorrhagia

An estimated 10%-30% of menstruating women experience menorrhagia at some time during their reproductive lives. Acute menorrhagia may present as an emergency requiring prompt medical or surgical intervention. Chronic menorrhagia affects a woman's quality of life in her work, family, and social interactions. Medical management is the first line of therapy for chronic menorrhagia. Agents that have been used to treat menorrhagia include iron, cyclooxygenase inhibitors, desmopressin, antifibrinolytics, gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists, androgens, combined oral contraceptives, and progestins. Progestins can be administered systemically or locally and may be given cyclically or continuously. Increased use of effective medical therapies has the potential to reduce the number of surgical procedures, such as endometrial ablation and hysterectomy.

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for heavy menstrual bleeding

BACKGROUND

Heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) is an important cause of ill health in premenopausal women. Although surgery is often used as a treatment, a range of medical therapies are also available. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs reduce prostaglandin levels which are elevated in women with excessive menstrual bleeding and also may have a beneficial effect on dysmenorrhoea.

OBJECTIVES

The primary objective of this review was to investigate the effectiveness of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in achieving a reduction in menstrual blood loss in women of reproductive years HMB.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Electronic searches for relevant randomised controlled trials of the Cochrane Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group Specialised Register of controlled trials, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Current Contents, the Cochrane Library and CINAHL were performed. Attempts were also made to identify trials from citation lists of review articles and drug companies were approached for unpublished data. In most cases, the first author of each included trial was contacted for additional information. An updated search was performed in September and October 2001 but no new eligible trials were identified.

SELECTION CRITERIA

The inclusion criteria were randomised comparisons of individual NSAIDs with either each other, placebo or other medical treatments in women with regular heavy periods measured either objectively or subjectively and with no pathological or iatrogenic (treatment induced) causes for their heavy menstrual blood loss.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Sixteen RCTs were identified that fulfilled the inclusion criteria for this review and data were extracted independently. Odds ratios for dichotomous outcomes and weighted mean differences for continuous outcomes were estimated from the data of nine trials. The results of the remaining seven crossover trials with data unsuitable for pooling were described in the Other Data section.

MAIN RESULTS

As a group, NSAIDs were more effective than placebo at reducing heavy menstrual bleeding but less effective than either tranexamic acid or danazol. Treatment with danazol caused a shorter duration of menstruation and more adverse events than NSAIDs but this did not appear to affect the acceptability of treatment. There were no statistically significant differences between NSAIDs and the other treatments (oral luteal progestogen, ethamsylate, progesterone releasing intra-uterine system (IUS), oral contraceptive pill (OCC)) but most studies were underpowered. There was no evidence of a difference between the individual NSAIDs (naproxen and mefenamic acid) in reducing HMB.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

NSAIDs reduce HMB when compared with placebo but are less effective than either tranexamic acid or danazol. However, adverse events are more severe with danazol therapy. In the limited number of small studies suitable for evaluation, no significant difference in efficacy was demonstrated between NSAIDs and other medical treatments such as oral luteal progestogen, ethamsylate, OCC or IUS.

Modern treatments of menorrhagia attributable to dysfunctional uterine bleeding

Menorrhagia (excessive uterine bleeding) affects some 20 percent of the women of reproductive age worldwide. The following review describes known and theorized etiologies of the disorder, followed by a discussion of treatment options that are currently in use as well as those on the horizon. There is much interest internationally in decreasing hysterectomy rates, particularly for those women with abnormal bleeding and anatomically normal uteri. It is these women who are the focus of this paper. Pharmacotherapy and surgery are the mainstay treatments for such patients with menorrhagia secondary to dysfunctional uterine bleeding. Most commonly, hormonal and nonhormonal medications are followed by dilatation and curettage, and ultimately, in many cases, hysterectomy. Endometrial ablation techniques have been evolving since the 1980s in response to the need for an efficacious, safer, and more cost-effective alternatives to hysterectomy. Hysteroscopic ablation achieves these goals but is difficult technically and requires significant additional training even for otherwise skilled and experienced gynecologists. The current decade has seen the development of many innovative approaches to performing endometrial ablation. These methods are intended to be much simpler to perform with less risk than electrosurgical or laser endometrial ablation. The final section of this article presents the published data to date on these new technologies, which should (in their refined state) revolutionize the treatment of menorrhagia secondary to dysfunctional uterine bleeding.

Management of abnormal uterine bleeding

Patients treated for dysfunctional uterine bleeding are separated into two groups: those with acute bleeding episodes and those with chronic repetitive bleeding problems. An acute bleeding episode is best controlled with the use of high-dose estrogen. A curettage is indicated for patients with acute bleeding resulting in hypovolemia, and a curettage or hysteroscopically directed biopsies is indicated for women with risk factors for endometrial cancer who have persistent bleeding problems. The management of anovulatory dysfunctional uterine bleeding is determined by the needs of the patient. In the adolescent medroxyprogesterone acetate is administered orally once a day for 10 days each month for > or = 3 months, and the patient is monitored closely thereafter. Oral contraceptives are used for women of reproductive age with anovulatory bleeding episodes who also require contraception. Clomiphene citrate is used for women of reproductive age with anovulatory bleeding who want to conceive. Oral medroxyprogesterone acetate is administered 10 days each month for 6 months for the treatment of anovulatory dysfunctional uterine bleeding alone in this age group. For the perimenopausal patient dysfunctional uterine bleeding may be treated by the administration of cyclic progestin or cyclic conjugated equine estrogens for 25 days with the concomitant administration of medroxyprogesterone acetate for days 18 to 25. The perimenopausal patient with dysfunctional uterine bleeding who is a nonsmoker and does not have evidence of vascular disease may also be treated with low-dose combination oral contraceptives. The long-term treatment for women with ovulatory dysfunctional uterine bleeding is the most difficult type of dysfunctional uterine bleeding to manage. The long-term therapy is directed at the reduction in menstrual blood loss. For these patients prolonged progestin use, oral contraceptives, nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs, antifibrinolytic agents, danazol, and as a last resort gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists are part of the therapeutic armamentarium. A combination of two or more of these agents is often required to successfully control the abnormal bleeding. For patients who no longer desire future fertility and have associated pelvic pathologic disorders or for those who fail all medical regimens, surgical therapy may be considered. Either hysterectomy or endometrial ablation has been used. Patients with von Willebrand's disease and excessive menstrual blood loss may be misdiagnosed as having dysfunctional uterine bleeding. van Willebrand's disease is the most common bleeding disorder and is present in approximately 1% of the population. It is much more common than previously recognized. There are improved diagnostic tests to identify this disorder and, most important, there is a high-concentration desmopressin acetate nasal spray available as treatment that does not involve the risk of transmission of hepatitis and human immunodeficiency virus.

Treating menorrhagia in primary care. An overview of drug trials and a survey of prescribing practice

Menorrhagia can be treated by drug therapy or surgery. General practitioners (GPs) can prescribe drugs to reduce menstrual blood loss as first-line treatment, referring patients for surgical treatment if drug therapy fails. This study examined the efficacy of drugs used to treat menorrhagia and surveyed British GPs to discover the extent to which they prescribed the most effective drugs for this condition. The results suggest that treatment of this condition in primary care falls short of desirable standards. A meta-analysis of randomized trials of drug therapy revealed wide differences in efficacy and side effects. The most effective drug (tranexamic acid) is little used by British GPs, whereas the least effective drug (norethisterone) is the most frequently prescribed.

The combination of a depot gonadotrophin releasing hormone agonist and cyclical hormone replacement therapy for dysfunctional uterine bleeding

OBJECTIVE

To observe if a combination of a depot GnRH agonist and cyclical hormone replacement therapy decreases menstrual blood loss.

DESIGN

An open, observational study comparing the objective assessment of menstrual blood loss before, during and after 3 months treatment.

SUBJECTS

20 women with a subjective complaint of heavy menstrual loss in whom no cause could be discovered.

INTERVENTIONS

Each woman received 3 months of depot goserelin (Zoladex) combined with cyclical hormone replacement therapy (Cyclo-Progynova, 1 mg). Menstrual loss and symptoms were assessed before, throughout and after the study.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Changes in objective and subjective assessments of menstrual blood loss and the acceptability of the treatment.

RESULTS

The median pretreatment menstrual loss was 68 ml (range 23-397). Only 8 (40%) of the patients had a loss exceeding 80 ml per period. The median blood loss was 30 ml, 16 ml, and 17 ml in the three treatment cycles (P less than 0.001 Wilcoxon rank sum for the third cycle). There was a significant decrease in the median length of menstruation (P less than 0.001) and the number of towels or tampons (P less than 0.01) used per period in the third treatment cycle. There was a significant decrease (P less than 0.005) in the number of women complaining of dysmenorrhoea, premenstrual symptoms, flooding and the passage of clots. Seventeen patients experienced hot flushes. Eighteen of the 20 patients were completely satisfied with the treatment and would have been happy to continue with it for longer than 12 months.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of a depot gonadotrophin releasing hormone agonist and cyclical hormone replacement therapy is a successful and acceptable treatment of dysfunctional uterine bleeding.

Risk-benefit assessment of drugs used for the treatment of menstrual disorders

This article considers the benign yet debilitating conditions of menorrhagia, dysmenorrhoea and irregular menstrual bleeding. Surprisingly little has been reported in the literature concerning these common ailments which can detract from the quality of female life during the reproduction years. Both dysmenorrhoea and menorrhagia are subjective complaints, but despite accurate means of measuring menstrual blood loss such quantification is rarely performed. This lack of diagnostic accuracy is a cause for concern, especially as both medical and surgical treatment are not without risk. The therapeutic alternatives which are commonly prescribed in an attempt to rectify such menstrual disorders are discussed. These include the nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents, the combined oral contraceptives, danazol, progestogens, antifibrinolytics, haemostatics, luteinising hormone releasing hormone analogues and clomiphene. The results of clinical trials which have utilised these various agents are considered in terms of both the effectiveness of treatment and its potential adverse effects.

Management of IUD-associated menorrhagia in female rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta)

The study was undertaken to evaluate the effect of antifibrinolytic agents (epsilon-aminocaproic acid, EACA; tranexamic acid, AMCA), anti-inflammatory drugs (indomethacin, IND; ibuprofen, IBU; naproxen, NAP) and root extract of the plant Boerhaavia diffusa (BD) on menstrual cycle length (MCL), duration of menstrual flow (DMF), menstrual iron loss (MIL) and activity of uterine tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) in IUD-fitted monkeys. Premature onset of menstruation was observed in IUD-fitted monkeys (26.0 +/- 0.7 days, mean +/- SE) as compared to controls (28.7 +/- 0.4 days). No noteworthy change was observed in the MCL of drug treated monkeys as compared to IUD-fitted monkeys. An increase of 155%, 123.2%, and 288% was observed in the DMF, MIL and tPA activity after IUD insertion as compared to controls. Antifibrinolytic agents reduced the DMF, MIL and activity of tPA in IUD-fitted monkeys up to 117.4%, 116.4%, and 254%, whereas anti-inflammatory drugs caused a decrease only up to 69%, 95.1%, and 138%, respectively. Conclusively, root extract of B. diffusa treated IUD-fitted monkeys showed noticeable reduction in their DMF (124%), MIL (120.8%) and tPA activity (272%).

Management of cyclical menorrhagia with prostaglandin synthetase inhibitor

A well controlled double blind prospective trial was undertaken to determine the efficacy of mefenamic acid in the treatment of menorrhagia. Eighty patients who had unexplained cyclical menorrhagia with secretory endometrium received mefenamic acid orally in a dose of 500 mg 8 hourly or a placebo tablet thrice daily starting from day-one of the cycle for 5 days or till cessation of menses. Mefenamic acid administration caused a statistically significant reduction in the number of days of bleeding from 9.7 +/- 3.1 days before treatment to 4.1 +/- 0.6 days after treatment. It also brought about significant reduction in the amount of bleeding in terms of number of pads used per day, that is from 15.2 +/- 3.1 before treatment to 6.5 +/- 0.02 after treatment. Eighty-six percent patients in the treatment group had control of menorrhagia with the drug compared to 20% in the control group without drugs and this difference was statistically significant. Mefenamic acid proved to be a potent and efficacious agent in the control of unexplained menorrhagia.

Eicosanoids in primary dysmenorrhea, endometriosis and menstrual migraine

This paper summarizes what has been learned over the years about the role of eicosanoids in the pathogenesis of primary dysmenorrhea, endometriosis and menstrual migraine. The role of prostaglandins (PGs) in the pathogenesis of primary dysmenorrhea is inferred from four main observations: firstly, the clinical symptoms of primary dysmenorrhea are similar to those induced by the administration of PGF2 alpha and PGE2 for the induction of labour; secondly, the increased production of PGs by the endometrium during the luteal and menstrual phases of ovulatory cycles is consistent with the occurrence of primary dysmenorrhea mainly in ovulatory cycles; thirdly, the concentrations of PGF2 alpha and PGE2 in the endometrium and menstrual fluid of dysmenorrheic women are significantly higher than in controls; fourthly, certain PG inhibitors have been proved to be effective in the treatment of dysmenorrhea. The change in PG production can explain the major symptoms of primary dysmenorrhea, including the increased uterine contractility, uterine ischemia and the lowering of the pain threshold to chemical and physical stimuli in the pelvic nerve terminals. Moreover, recent experimental data suggest that leukotrienes (LTs) might be among the alternative pathogenetic causes of primary dysmenorrhea. The data which support a relationship between eicosanoids and endometriosis are as follows: endometriotic tissue produces PGs; the peritoneal fluid concentration of PGF2 alpha increases significantly after the induction of endometriosis in laboratory animals; the concentration of PGs in peritoneal fluid of some patients with endometriosis is greater than in controls and, finally, the number and activation of pelvic macrophages which are able to synthesize eicosanoids increase in patients with endometriosis. Possible roles for eicosanoids in the pathogenesis of infertility and secondary dysmenorrhea induced by endometriosis have been suggested. Eicosanoids are probably also involved in the pathogenesis of menstrual migraine. Different types of PGs might play a role both in the initial vasoconstriction during the prodromal phase of migraine and in the vasodilation and sensitization to pain typical of the pain phase.