Ketanserin versus dihydralazine in the management of severe early-onset preeclampsia: maternal outcome

Anti-hypertensive therapy for preeclampsia: a network meta-analysis and systematic review

BACKGROUND

Preeclampsia (PE) is a pregnancy disorder that represents a major cause of maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality.

METHODS

This network meta-analysis was registered with PROSPERO. We searched the PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov. and Embase databases for studies published from inception to the 31st of March 2023. RevMan5.3 software provided by the Cochrane Collaboration was used for direct meta-analysis (DMA) statistical analysis. Funnel maps, network meta-analysis (NMA), the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) to rank the different interventions and publication bias were generated by STATA 17.0 software.

RESULTS

We included eight randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving a total of 1192 women with PE; two studies were of high quality and six were of moderate quality. Eight interventions were addressed in the NMA. In the DMA, we found that blood pressure in the Ketanserin group were significantly higher than those in the Nicardipine group. NMA showed that blood pressure in the Dihydralazine group was significantly higher than that in the Methyldopa, Labetalol, Nicardipine and Diltiazem groups. And the blood pressure in the Labetalol group was significantly lower than that in the Nicardipine group. SUCRA values showed that Diltiazem was more effective in lowering blood pressure than other drugs looked at in this study.

CONCLUSION

According to the eight RCTs included in this study, Diltiazem was the most effective in reducing blood pressure in PE patients; Labetalol and Nicardipine also had good effects. Diltiazem is preferred for the treatment of patients with severe PE and high blood pressure.

Pharmaceutical administration for severe hypertension during pregnancy: Network meta-analysis

Aims: To evaluate the efficacy of different pharmacologic treatment for severe hypertension during pregnancy. Methods: Two reviewers searched Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid EMbase, and the Cochrane Library for randomized clinical trials from the establishment of the database to 15 July 2021 that were eligible for inclusion and analyzed the pharmaceuticals used for severe hypertension in pregnancy. Results: 29 relevant trials with 2,521 participants were involved. Compared with diazoxide in rate of achieving target blood pressure, other pharmaceuticals, including epoprostenol (RR:1.58, 95%CI:1.01-2.47), hydralazine\dihydralazine (RR:1.57, 95%CI:1.07-2.31), ketanserin (RR:1.67, 95%CI:1.09-2.55), labetalol (RR:1.54, 95%CI:1.04-2.28), nifedipine (RR:1.54, 95%CI:1.04-2.29), and urapidil (RR:1.57, 95%CI:1.00-2.47), were statistically significant in the rate of achieving target blood pressure. According to the SUCRA, diazoxide showed the best therapeutic effect, followed by nicardipine, nifedipine, labetalol, and nitroglycerine. The three pharmaceuticals with the worst therapeutic effect were ketanserin, hydralazine, and urapidil. It is worth noting that the high ranking of the top two pharmaceuticals, including diazoxide and nicardipine, comes from extremely low sample sizes. Other outcomes were reported in the main text. Conclusion: This comprehensive network meta-analysis demonstrated that the nifedipine should be recommended as a strategy for blood pressure management in pregnant women with severe hypertension. Moreover, the conventional pharmaceuticals, including labetalol and hydralazine, showed limited efficacy. However, it was important to note that the instability of hydralazine reducing blood pressure and the high benefit of labetalol with high dosages intakes should also be of concern to clinicians.

Antihypertensive Medications for Severe Hypertension in Pregnancy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: Hypertension in pregnancy causes significant maternal and fetal mortality and morbidity. A comprehensive assessment of the effectiveness of antihypertensive drugs for severe hypertension during pregnancy is needed to make informed decisions in clinical practice. This systematic review aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of antihypertensive drugs in severe hypertension during pregnancy. Methods: A systematic review using the electronic databases MEDLINE (PubMed) and Cochrane Library was performed until August 2021. The risk-of-bias 2 tool was used to assess the risk-of-bias in each study included. Meta-analysis was conducted to assess heterogeneity and to estimate the pooled effects size. Results: Seventeen studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria and 11 were included in the meta-analysis. Nifedipine was estimated to have a low risk in persistent hypertension compared to hydralazine (RR 0.40, 95% CI 0.23–0.71) and labetalol (RR 0.71, 95% CI 0.52–0.97). Dihydralazine was associated with a lower risk of persistent hypertension than ketanserin (RR 5.26, 95% CI 2.01–13.76). No difference was found in the risk of maternal hypotension, maternal and fetal outcomes, and adverse effects between antihypertensive drugs, except for dihydralazine, which was associated with more adverse effects than ketanserin. Conclusions: Several drugs can be used to treat severe hypertension in pregnancy, including oral/sublingual nifedipine, IV/oral labetalol, oral methyldopa, IV hydralazine, IV dihydralazine, IV ketanserin, IV nicardipine, IV urapidil, and IV diazoxide. In addition, nifedipine may be preferred as the first-line agent. There was no difference in the risk of maternal hypotension, maternal and fetal outcomes, and adverse effects between the drugs, except for adverse effects in IV dihydralazine and IV ketanserin.

Inadequate safety reporting in pre-eclampsia trials: a systematic evaluation

BACKGROUND

Randomised trials and their syntheses in meta-analyses offer a unique opportunity to assess the frequency and severity of adverse reactions.

OBJECTIVE

To assess safety reporting in pre-eclampsia trials.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Systematic search using bibliographic databases, including Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, and MEDLINE, from inception to August 2017.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised trials evaluating anticonvulsant or antihypertensive medication for pre-eclampsia.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Descriptive statistics appraising the adequacy of adverse reaction and toxicity reporting.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 60 randomised trials. Six trials (10%) were registered with the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, two registry records referred to adverse reactions, stating 'safety and toleration' and 'possible side effects' would be collected. Twenty-six trials (43%) stated the frequency of withdrawals within each study arm, and five trials (8%) adequately reported these withdrawals. Adverse reactions were inconsistently reported across eligible trials: 24 (40%) reported no serious adverse reactions and 36 (60%) reported no mild adverse reactions. The methods of definition or measurement of adverse reactions were infrequently reported within published trial reports.

CONCLUSIONS

Pre-eclampsia trials regularly omit critical information related to safety. Despite the paucity of reporting, randomised trials collect an enormous amount of safety data. Developing and implementing a minimum data set could help to improve safety reporting, permitting a more balanced assessment of interventions by considering the trade-off between the benefits and harms.

FUNDING

National Institute for Health Research (DRF-2014-07-051), UK; Maternity Forum, Royal Society of Medicine, UK.

TWEETABLE ABSTRACT

Developing @coreoutcomes could help to improve safety reporting in #preeclampsia trials. @NIHR_DC.

Drugs for treatment of very high blood pressure during pregnancy

BACKGROUND

Very high blood pressure during pregnancy poses a serious threat to women and their babies. The aim of antihypertensive therapy is to lower blood pressure quickly but safety, to avoid complications. Antihypertensive drugs lower blood pressure but their comparative effectiveness and safety, and impact on other substantive outcomes is uncertain.

OBJECTIVES

To compare different antihypertensive drugs for very high blood pressure during pregnancy.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group Trials Register (9 January 2013).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Studies were randomised trials. Participants were women with severe hypertension during pregnancy. Interventions were comparisons of one antihypertensive drug with another.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed trials for inclusion and assessed trial quality. Two review authors extracted data and checked them for accuracy.

MAIN RESULTS

Thirty-five trials (3573 women) with 15 comparisons were included. Women allocated calcium channel blockers were less likely to have persistent high blood pressure compared to those allocated hydralazine (six trials, 313 women; 8% versus 22%; risk ratio (RR) 0.37, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.21 to 0.66). Ketanserin was associated with more persistent high blood pressure than hydralazine (three trials, 180 women; 27% versus 6%; RR 4.79, 95% CI 1.95 to 11.73), but fewer side-effects (three trials, 120 women; RR 0.32, 95% CI 0.19 to 0.53) and a lower risk of HELLP (haemolysis, elevated liver enzymes and lowered platelets) syndrome (one trial, 44 women; RR 0.20, 95% CI 0.05 to 0.81).Labetalol was associated with a lower risk of hypotension compared to diazoxide (one trial 90 women; RR 0.06, 95% CI 0.00 to 0.99) and a lower risk of caesarean section (RR 0.43, 95% CI 0.18 to 1.02), although both were borderline for statistical significance.Both nimodipine and magnesium sulphate were associated with a high incidence of persistent high blood pressure, but this risk was lower for nimodipine compared to magnesium sulphate (one trial, 1650 women; 47% versus 65%; RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.76 to 0.93). Nimodipine was associated with a lower risk of respiratory difficulties (RR 0.28, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.99), fewer side-effects (RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.55 to 0.85) and less postpartum haemorrhage (RR 0.41, 95% CI 0.18 to 0.92) than magnesium sulphate. Stillbirths and neonatal deaths were not reported.There are insufficient data for reliable conclusions about the comparative effects of any other drugs.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Until better evidence is available the choice of antihypertensive should depend on the clinician's experience and familiarity with a particular drug; on what is known about adverse effects; and on women's preferences. Exceptions are nimodipine, magnesium sulphate (although this is indicated for women who require an anticonvulsant for prevention or treatment of eclampsia), diazoxide and ketanserin, which are probably best avoided.

Pregnant Rats Treated With a Serotonin Precursor Have Reduced Fetal Weight and Lower Plasma Volume and Kallikrein Levels

Pregnant women with preeclampsia have increased serotonin levels, suggesting a possible role of this amine in abnormal pregnancy. With the hypothesis that an increase in serotonin would reduce volume expansion and cause fetal growth restriction, we evaluated the maternal and fetal effects of the administration of the serotonin precursor 5-hidroxytryptophan (5-HTP) to Sprague-Dawley rats. At pregnancy day 13 (n=19) or in random cycle nonpregnant rats (n=10), animals were assigned to a single injection of 5-HTP (100 mg/kg IP) or to a control group. Animals were studied at day 21, after overnight urinary collection. Additional pregnant rats received ketanserin (1 mg/kg), a 5-HT 2 receptor antagonist, 1 hour before 5-HTP injection. In pregnant rats, 5-HTP lowered plasma volume (control: 22±1.1; 5-HTP: 17±0.7 mL; P <0.001) and creatinine clearance, whereas serum creatinine and urinary protein excretion were increased; no changes were observed in nonpregnant rats. Systolic blood pressure did not change significantly. Urinary kallikrein activity and plasma aldosterone levels decreased only in pregnant animals. Fetal (control: 5.5±0.1; 5-HTP: 4.2±0.2 g; P <0.001) and placental weights were reduced. In nonpregnant and pregnant animals, 5-HTP caused profound renal morphological alterations and decreased kallikrein immunostaining. Preadministration of ketanserin abolished all of the changes associated with the use of 5-HTP. These data indicate that the administration of a serotonin precursor to pregnant rats limits plasma volume expansion and fetal growth via 5-HT 2 receptors, suggesting a possible role for serotonin in abnormal pregnancy. We postulate that an increased vascular resistance, both at the placental and renal levels, mediates these effects.

A randomised comparison of hydralazine and mini-bolus diazoxide for hypertensive emergencies in pregnancy: The PIVOT trial

AIMS

Diazoxide is one of few available agents for treatment of hypertensive emergencies in pregnancy. From previous studies, there is a question concerning safety after moderate-dose administration caused episodes of hypotension. Rapid control of severe hypertension is necessary to reduce maternal morbidity, for example, stroke and placental abruption. This study was designed to compare the efficacy of mini-bolus diazoxide with intravenous (i.v.) hydralazine.

DESIGN

A randomised controlled trial.

SETTING

Tertiary referral maternity hospital, Royal Prince Alfred Women and Babies, Sydney Australia.

POPULATION

Antenatal and postnatal women with severe hypertension.

METHODS

One hundred and twenty-four hypertensive women were randomised to either i.v. hydralazine (5 mg doses) or mini-bolus diazoxide (15 mg doses).

PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE

Achievement of target blood pressure reduction; secondary measures included requirement for Caesarean section because of fetal deterioration as determined by non-reassuring cardiotocograph (CTG).

RESULTS

Reduction in systolic and diastolic blood pressure was 34 min for hydralazine and 19 min for diazoxide (P < 0.001). There were no episodes of hypotension after diazoxide and one after hydralazine (after epidural). Episodes of persistent severe hypertension were more common with hydralazine (38%) than with diazoxide (16%), P < 0.01. The Caesarean section rate for no-reassuring CTG was no different between the two groups. Neonatal outcomes were similar.

CONCLUSION

Diazoxide and hydralazine are safe and effective antihypertensives, showing a controlled and comparable blood pressure reduction in women with hypertensive emergencies in pregnancy. The mini-bolus doses of 15 mg of diazoxide did not precipitate maternal hypotension as previously described and reduces episodes of persistent severe hypertension.

Insufficient efficacy of intravenous ketanserin in severe early-onset pre-eclampsia

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the efficacy of intravenous ketanserin in controlling blood pressure of severe early-onset pre-eclamptic patients.

STUDY DESIGN

Pre-eclamptic patients (n=47) with a gestational age (GA) between 21 and 32 weeks were treated with intravenous ketanserin in a maximum dosage of 14 mg/h, to obtain a diastolic blood pressure of 90 mmHg or below. The number of patients reaching and maintaining target blood pressure was retrospectively assessed. Patient characteristics associated with an adequate or inadequate response to ketanserin treatment were identified.

RESULTS

With a maximum intravenous dosage of ketanserin, target blood pressure was not achieved in 15 (32%) patients. A high systolic blood pressure at the start of treatment was significantly (p=0.02) associated with failure of ketanserin treatment. The median period of ketanserin treatment in the responding group was 3 days (range 1-10 days). In 26 (55%) of initially successfully treated patients, additional antihypertensive drugs had to be added to maintain adequate blood pressure control.

CONCLUSION

Intravenous ketanserin lacks antihypertensive efficacy in a substantial proportion of severe pre-eclamptic patients, despite high dosages. In patients who initially respond well to ketanserin treatment, additional antihypertensive treatment is often necessary to maintain adequate blood pressure control.

Drugs for treatment of very high blood pressure during pregnancy

BACKGROUND

Very high blood pressure during pregnancy poses a serious threat to women and their babies. Antihypertensive drugs lower blood pressure. Their comparative effects on other substantive outcomes, however, is uncertain.

OBJECTIVES

To compare different antihypertensive drugs for very high blood pressure during pregnancy.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group Trials Register (28 February 2006) and CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library 2006, Issue 2).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Studies were randomised trials. Participants were women with severe hypertension during pregnancy. Interventions were comparisons of one antihypertensive drug with another.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently extracted data.

MAIN RESULTS

Twenty-four trials (2949 women) with 12 comparisons were included. Women allocated calcium channel blockers rather than hydralazine were less likely to have persistent high blood (five trials, 263 women; 6% versus 18%; relative risk (RR) 0.33, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.15 to 0.70). Ketanserin was associated with more persistent high blood pressure than hydralazine (four trials, 200 women; 27% versus 6%; RR 4.79, 95% CI 1.95 to 11.73), but fewer side-effects (three trials, 120 women; RR 0.32, 95% CI 0.19 to 0.53) and a lower risk of HELLP (Haemolysis, Elevated Liver enzymes and Lowered Platelets) syndrome (one trial, 44 women, RR 0.20, 95% CI 0.05 to 0.81). Labetalol was associated with a higher risk of hypotension (one trial 90 women; RR 0.06, 95% CI 0.00 to 0.99) and caesarean section (RR 0.43, 95% CI 0.18 to 1.02) than diazoxide. Data were insufficient for reliable conclusions about other outcomes. The risk of persistent high blood pressure was greater for nimodipine compared to magnesium sulphate (two trials 1683 women; 47% versus 65%; RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.76 to 0.93). Nimodipine was also associated with a higher risk of eclampsia (RR 2.24, 95% CI 1.06 to 4.73) and respiratory difficulties (RR 0.28, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.99), but fewer side-effects (RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.54 to 0.86) and less postpartum haemorrhage (RR 0.41, 95% CI 0.18 to 0.92) than magnesium sulphate. Stillbirths and neonatal deaths were not reported. There are insufficient data for reliable conclusions about the comparative effects of any other drugs.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Until better evidence is available, the choice of antihypertensive should depend on the clinician's experience and familiarity with a particular drug, and on what is known about adverse effects. Exceptions are diazoxide, ketanserin, nimodipine and magnesium sulphate, which are probably best avoided.

Preeclampsia: the Death of Goliath

In this review, a novel and unifying pathophysiologic mechanism of preeclampsia is presented whereby a minimal excess of placental immune complex production versus removal causes a proinflammatory autoamplification cascade of trophoblast apoptosis/necrosis and oxidative stress, culminating in clinical preeclampsia. This concept immediately leads to a plethora of new and robust therapeutic strategies.

Plasma volume and blood pressure regulation in hypertensive pregnancy

BACKGROUND

Pre-eclampsia is a multisystem disorder, peculiar to and frequent in human pregnancy. It remains a leading cause of maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality. Hemodynamic disturbances are the most prominent features of the syndrome.

PURPOSE

To provide an overview of plasma volume regulation and blood pressure control mechanisms outside pregnancy, and of the changes in normal pregnancies and in pregnancies complicated by hypertensive disorders. Furthermore, to discuss the rationale of several hemodynamic interventions.

RESULTS

In normal pregnancy, large cardiovascular changes take place. A generalized fall in vascular tone by systemic vasorelaxation causes increased blood volume, heart rate and cardiac output. In the preclinical phase, differences have been observed between normal and hypertensive pregnancies in the function of the autonomic nervous system, cardiac output and plasma volume, the volume remaining at the non-pregnant level. In the clinical phase of pre-eclampsia the typical case picture is one of a vasoconstrictive state with low plasma volume and cardiac output, high blood pressure and systemic vascular resistance in combination with signs of organ damage [proteinuria, hemolysis elevated liver enzymes low platelets (HELLP) syndrome]. Hemodynamic management is necessary in severe disease to prevent maternal complications. Management primarily focuses on pharmacological treatment of blood pressure. Clinicians make educated choices from a limited array of available drugs: beta-receptor antagonists, nifedipine, dihydralazine, methyldopa or ketanserine. Other drugs have restricted use in pregnancy. Management of low circulating volume with plasma expanders remains a subject of controversy.

Ketanserin in Women With Chronic Hypertension and Underlying Thrombophilia

BACKGROUND

Pregnant women with chronic hypertension and thrombophilia have an increased risk for preeclampsia and/or intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR). Ketanserin lowers blood pressure and inhibits serotonin-induced platelet aggregation.

CASES

A 38-year-old woman with chronic hypertension had a first pregnancy with severe hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelets (HELLP) syndrome. A second pregnancy with prophylactic oral ketanserin and low-dose aspirin was uneventful. The third pregnancy without oral ketanserin was again complicated by severe superimposed preeclampsia and IUGR. During this pregnancy a prothrombin mutation was found. A 37-year-old woman with chronic hypertension developed severe early-onset superimposed preeclampsia in her first pregnancy. In the 3 consecutive pregnancies, she was treated with low-molecular-weight heparin because of a factor XII deficiency. Only the pregnancy with the use of prophylactic oral ketanserin was uncomplicated.

CONCLUSION

Clinical trials are warranted to analyze the role of oral ketanserin in preventing preeclampsia and IUGR.

Hydralazine for treatment of severe hypertension in pregnancy: meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To review outcomes in randomised controlled trials comparing hydralazine against other antihypertensives for severe hypertension in pregnancy.

STUDY DESIGN

Meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (published between 1966 and September 2002) of short acting antihypertensives for severe hypertension in pregnancy. Independent data abstraction by two reviewers. Data were entered into RevMan software for analysis (fixed effects model, relative risk and 95% confidence interval); in a secondary analysis, risk difference was also calculated.

RESULTS

Of 21 trials (893 women), eight compared hydralazine with nifedipine and five with labetalol. Hydralazine was associated with a trend towards less persistent severe hypertension than labetalol (relative risk 0.29 (95% confidence interval 0.08 to 1.04); two trials), but more severe hypertension than nifedipine or isradipine (1.41 (0.95 to 2.09); four trials); there was significant heterogeneity in outcome between trials and differences in methodological quality. Hydralazine was associated with more maternal hypotension (3.29 (1.50 to 7.23); 13 trials); more caesarean sections (1.30 (1.08 to 1.59); 14 trials); more placental abruption (4.17 (1.19 to 14.28); five trials); more maternal oliguria (4.00 (1.22 to 12.50); three trials); more adverse effects on fetal heart rate (2.04 (1.32 to 3.16); 12 trials); and more low Apgar scores at one minute (2.70 (1.27 to 5.88); three trials). For all but Apgar scores, analysis by risk difference showed heterogeneity between trials. Hydralazine was associated with more maternal side effects (1.50 (1.16 to 1.94); 12 trials) and with less neonatal bradycardia than labetalol (risk difference -0.24 (-0.42 to -0.06); three trials).

CONCLUSIONS

The results are not robust enough to guide clinical practice, but they do not support use of hydralazine as first line for treatment of severe hypertension in pregnancy. Adequately powered clinical trials are needed, with a comparison of labetalol and nifedipine showing the most promise.

Hydralazine for treatment of severe hypertension in pregnancy: meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To review outcomes in randomised controlled trials comparing hydralazine against other antihypertensives for severe hypertension in pregnancy.

STUDY DESIGN

Meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (published between 1966 and September 2002) of short acting antihypertensives for severe hypertension in pregnancy. Independent data abstraction by two reviewers. Data were entered into RevMan software for analysis (fixed effects model, relative risk and 95% confidence interval); in a secondary analysis, risk difference was also calculated.

RESULTS

Of 21 trials (893 women), eight compared hydralazine with nifedipine and five with labetalol. Hydralazine was associated with a trend towards less persistent severe hypertension than labetalol (relative risk 0.29 (95% confidence interval 0.08 to 1.04); two trials), but more severe hypertension than nifedipine or isradipine (1.41 (0.95 to 2.09); four trials); there was significant heterogeneity in outcome between trials and differences in methodological quality. Hydralazine was associated with more maternal hypotension (3.29 (1.50 to 7.23); 13 trials); more caesarean sections (1.30 (1.08 to 1.59); 14 trials); more placental abruption (4.17 (1.19 to 14.28); five trials); more maternal oliguria (4.00 (1.22 to 12.50); three trials); more adverse effects on fetal heart rate (2.04 (1.32 to 3.16); 12 trials); and more low Apgar scores at one minute (2.70 (1.27 to 5.88); three trials). For all but Apgar scores, analysis by risk difference showed heterogeneity between trials. Hydralazine was associated with more maternal side effects (1.50 (1.16 to 1.94); 12 trials) and with less neonatal bradycardia than labetalol (risk difference -0.24 (-0.42 to -0.06); three trials).

CONCLUSIONS

The results are not robust enough to guide clinical practice, but they do not support use of hydralazine as first line for treatment of severe hypertension in pregnancy. Adequately powered clinical trials are needed, with a comparison of labetalol and nifedipine showing the most promise.

Differences in management and results in term-delivery in nine European referral hospitals: descriptive study

OBJECTIVE

To compose obstetric interventions around Europe.

STUDY DESIGN

A survey of obstetric practices, logistics and statistical outcomes in nine tertiary referral hospitals in Europe between November 1999 and October 2000.

RESULTS

There was wide variation in the management of pre labour rupture of the membranes at term, methods of analgesia, induction of labour, and mode of cephalic and breech delivery. Midwives practised normal deliveries at only three sites. Rates of epidural analgesia varied from 0% in Perugia to 98% in Barcelona, instrumental delivery from 3% in Perugia to 40% in Barcelona, episiotomy from 9.7% in Uppsala to 58% in Perugia, caesarean section before and during labour from 12% in Paris to 32% in Athens, vaginal breech delivery from 15% in Barcelona to 70% in Paris. The percentage of primipara varied from 40% in Uppsala to 65% in Perugia; birth weight under 2500g from 5% in Uppsala to 23% in Amsterdam, over 4000g from 3.1% in Athens to 22% in Uppsala and gestational age less than 37 weeks from 6% in Dublin to 26% in Amsterdam.

CONCLUSION

There are considerable differences in obstetric practices without any major difference in maternal and perinatal mortality.

The optimal dosage of ketanserin for patients with severe hypertension in pregnancy

OBJECTIVE

To establish the optimal dosage of ketanserin in the treatment of severe hypertension in pregnancy.

STUDY DESIGN

A double blind prospective randomised controlled trail, comparing 10 mg ketanserin given as intravenous boluses either every 10 or 20 min, until the therapeutic goal of 90 mmHg (diastolic blood pressure) was reached, to a maximum of eight boluses. Main outcome measures were treatment failures and caesarean sections for fetal distress.

RESULTS

There was no difference in reaching the therapeutic goal between patients receiving 10 mg ketanserin either every 10 or 20 min.

CONCLUSION

Ketanserin appears to be an attractive medicine in the treatment of severe hypertension in pregnancy, but the optimal dosage could not be established.

Calcium channel blockers in the management of preterm labor and hypertension in pregnancy

Calcium channel blockers (CCBs) have the ability to inhibit contractility in smooth muscle cells. CCBs have an already established role in the treatment of non-pregnant hypertension and angina pectoris. Some epidemiological studies found an association between the use of CCBs and an increase in cardiovascular mortality, malignancy, and gastrointestinal bleeding. More recent studies with many more patients and a longer follow-up did not find these associations. In obstetrics CCBs have become increasingly popular for the management of preterm labor and pregnancy-induced hypertensive disorders. Meta-analysis shows that use of nifedipine in comparison with betamimetics is associated with a more frequent successful prolongation of pregnancy in case of preterm labor, resulting in significantly fewer admissions of newborns to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), and is associated with a lower incidence of respiratory distress syndrome. No adverse fetal side effects in humans have been reported with the use of nifedipine for obstetric indications. Nifedipine is an effective and safe drug to use when tocolytic therapy is indicated for preterm labor. In preeclampsia nifedipine effectively lowers blood pressure and can be a good alternative for (di) hydralazine.

Ketanserin for the treatment of preeclampsia

OBJECTIVE

To compare maternal and perinatal outcome with the use of either intravenous ketanserin or dihydralazine in treatment of women with preeclampsia.

METHODS

The records from January 1989 to January 1997 of all patients receiving intravenous ketanserin or dihydralazine as first line antihypertensive therapy were reviewed and standardized data forms were completed. 315 charts of patients were identified and evaluated for effects on blood pressure, laboratory parameters, maternal and perinatal outcome.

RESULTS

During the study interval 169 patients received ketanserin and 146 dihydralazine. Significantly fewer antepartum (27% versus 38%, p = 0.04) and postpartum (25% versus 39%, p = 0.01) maternal complications were noted in patients receiving ketanserin. Occurrence of HELLP syndrome was significantly lower among patients who received ketanserin (20%) than among those who received dihydralazine (40%, p = 0.0001). Side-effects were reported with significantly higher frequency in patients receiving dihydralazine (60%) as compared to those receiving ketanserin (17%, p < 0.0001). Perinatal outcome was comparable, however, umbilical cord arterial pH values (mean +/- SD) were higher with ketanserin compared to dihydralazine (7.25 +/- 0.07 vs 7.23 +/- 0.09, p = 0.038). The incidence of placental abruption was higher in patients receiving dihydralazine (5.5%) versus those receiving ketanserin (0.6%, p = 0.014).

CONCLUSION

Ketanserin appears to be a better option than dihydralazine for treatment of severe preeclampsia since fewer maternal complications and side-effects were observed in patients receiving ketanserin.

Management and monitoring of severe preeclampsia

Preeclampsia is associated with increased maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality. Preeclampsia is more than pregnancy-induced hypertension. The hypertension is only one manifestation of an underlying multifactorial, multisystem disorder, initiated early in pregnancy. In established severe disease there is volume contraction, reduced cardiac output, enhanced vascular reactivity, increased vascular permeability and platelet consumption. Medical treatment of severe hypertension in pregnancy is required. The more controversial issues are the role of pharmacological treatment in conservative management of severe preeclampsia aiming at prolongation of pregnancy, the ability of such therapy to modify the course of the underlying systemic disorder and the effects on fetal and maternal outcome. This paper presents an overview concerning the current developments in management and monitoring of severe preeclampsia. Controversial topics such as the role of plasma volume expansion in preeclampsia, expectant versus aggressive management of severe preeclampsia remote from term, and pharmacological interventions in the management of eclampsia and the HELLP syndrome are addressed.

Pharmacological treatment of severe hypertension in pregnancy and the role of serotonin(2)-receptor blockers

Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy are the leading cause of maternal and perinatal mortality and morbidity in developing and developed countries. The etiology of preeclampsia is still unknown. Delivering the baby is the only definite treatment. The benefits of acute pharmacological control of severe hypertension prior to and/or post-delivery are generally accepted. Most drugs commonly used in the management of severe hypertension in pregnancy have significant maternal and/or neonatal adverse side effects. Furthermore, some are not effective to acutely lower the blood pressure in patients with a hypertensive crisis. Until recently not one of the commonly used antihypertensive drugs has been tailored to the pathophysiology of severe preeclampsia, being a clinical syndrome characterized by endothelial cell dysfunction, vasospasm and platelet aggregation. Ketanserin, a serotonin(2)-receptor blocker, is a drug that appears to be tailored for treating this pregnancy-associated enthothelial cell dysfunction. The results of several prospective trials show that there is a definite place for serotonin(2)-receptor blockers in the treatment of pregnancy-induced hypertensive disorders. This review provides a summary on the more established drugs as well as on some of the newer antihypertensive drugs used in pregnancy with emphasis on the existing experience with ketanserin.

Serotonin antagonism and serotonin antagonists in pregnancy: role of ketanserin

Most agree that antihypertensive medication should be used to treat severe hypertension during pregnancy, but its role in patients with mild to moderate disease is debated. None of the regularly used drugs is completely safe for mother and fetus. Ketanserin decreases systolic and diastolic blood pressure in nonpregnant patients with acute and chronic hypertension. Its selective serotonin S2-receptor antagonist activity encouraged investigations into a possible role in pregnant women. These reports can be divided into four groups. Several studies confirmed that intravenous ketanserin decreases blood pressure significantly in patients with severe preeclampsia. There are indications that it may be at least as effective as dihydralazine, possibly with fewer side effects. Its role in chronic hypertension has not been studied adequately, but one randomized, controlled trial indicated efficacy comparable with that of alpha-methyldopa. Thirdly, it was concluded in a single descriptive study that the administration of ketanserin to patients with HELLP syndrome allowed delivery to be postponed for 5.3 days. Lastly, in a randomized, placebo-controlled trial, the addition of ketanserin to aspirin in patients with mild to moderate midtrimester hypertension was associated with a significant decrease in the number of cases of preeclampsia and severe hypertension, as well as a trend to less perinatal mortality, lower rates of abruptio placentae, and early-onset preeclampsia. Additional studies are needed to adequately assess a possible role for ketanserin with acute hypertension or moderate chronic hypertension.

TARGET AUDIENCE

Obstetricians & Gynecologists, Family Physicians

LEARNING OBJECTIVES

After completion of this article, the reader will be able to list the various drugs and their associated side effects that are used to treat hypertensive disorders during pregnancy; to describe the various effects of serotonin on the cardiovascular system; to summarize the literature concerning the use of ketanserin during pregnancy; and to list the potential uses of ketanserin in this setting.

Drugs for rapid treatment of very high blood pressure during pregnancy

BACKGROUND

Very high blood pressure during pregnancy poses a serious threat to women and their fetuses. The use of drugs to lower blood pressure may reduce this risk.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this review was to compare different antihypertensive drugs used for rapid treatment of severe hypertension during pregnancy.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group trials register and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register.

STUDIES

All randomised trials. Quasi random designs were excluded.

PARTICIPANTS

Women with severe hypertension during pregnancy. Women postpartum at trial entry were excluded.

INTERVENTIONS

Comparisons of one antihypertensive agent with another.

OUTCOMES

For the women: blood pressure control, eclampsia, serious maternal morbidity (such as kidney failure and liver failure), Caesarean section, and use of health service resources (such as admission to hospital or intensive care unit). For the baby: death, serious neonatal morbidity, infant and child development, and use of health service resources (such as admission to a special care nursery).

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data were extracted independently by two reviewers to assess eligibility and describe the trial characteristics, and by one reviewer for the meta-analyses. Discrepancies were resolved by discussion. There was no blinding of authorship or results. Whenever possible, unpublished data were sought from investigators.

MAIN RESULTS

Thirteen of the 14 trials included in this review were small (range 19-627 women). Of the eight comparisons, five included hydralazine. Diazoxide given as 75mg bolus injections appears to be associated with profound hypotension requiring treatment, and ketanserin is less effective than hydralazine at reducing blood pressure. There is no other evidence that any one of the other antihypertensive agents is better than another for women with severe hypertension during pregnancy.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

Until better evidence is available, the choice of antihypertensive should depend on the experience and familiarity of an individual clinician with a particular drug, and on what is known about adverse maternal and fetal side-effects. Exceptions are diazoxide and ketanserin, which are probably not good choices.

Hypertension in pregnancy: new recommendations for management

Hypertension in pregnancy is a frequent complication that has substantial adverse perinatal outcomes. Hypertension may be preexisting (chronic) essential or secondary hypertension; a second entity is pregnancy induced (gestational hypertension, preeclampsia). Recent advances have identified newer markers for pregnancy hypertension: several potential candidate genes may explain the apparent family inheritance of preeclampsia, and some thrombophilic markers have been associated with the condition. Management options for mild to moderate hypertension include a short hospital stay to exclude ongoing severe hypertension and to ascertain fetal well-being. Outpatient care with appropriate maternal and fetal surveillance, including umbilical artery doppler velocimetry, is recommended for better perinatal outcomes. Acute care for severe hypertension includes the use of magnesium sulfate to prevent eclampsia and antihypertensive medication. Expeditious delivery is recommended when the maternal or fetal states cannot be stabilized. Follow-up after delivery allows the uncovering of any other coexisting hypertensive or cardiovascular disorder.