The effect of amniotic fluid on the human omental artery in vitro

[Amniotic fluid embolism: successful evolution course after uterine arteries embolization]

A 28-year-old woman, G3P3, who was otherwise healthy and had taken no medication and had no known allergy, was admitted to our hospital for delivery after a normal pregnancy. An epidural catheter was inserted for analgesia and labour was induced with oxytocin. Two hours later, she suffered a sudden cardiac arrest. She was immediately treated and, since a normal cardiac rhythm and a blood pressure of 90 mmHg has been obtained 30 minutes later, a 3750 g child was delivered by caesarean section. Soon after delivery, a life-threatening uterine haemorrhage appeared, due to DIC. Evolution was favourable, after bilateral uterine arteries embolization had been performed. The diagnosis of amniotic fluid embolism was established by the clinical course, the absence of local cause and the presence of a large number of amniotic cells in the mother's peripheral blood. Tryptase blood concentration was normal in the mother's blood.

Disseminated intravascular coagulation: a review of etiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management: guidelines for care

The pathophysiologic mechanisms, clinical, and laboratory manifestations of DIC are complex in part due to interrelationships within the hemostasis system. Only by clearly understanding these extraordinarily complex pathophysiologic interrelationships can the clinician and laboratory scientist appreciate the divergent and wide spectrum of often confusing clinical and laboratory findings in patients with DIC. Many therapeutic decisions to be made are controversial and lack validation. Nevertheless, newer antithrombotic agents, and agents that can block, blunt, or modify cytokine activity and the activity of vasoactive substances appear to be of value. The complexity and variable degree of clinical expression suggests that therapy should be individualized depending on the nature of DIC, age, etiology of DIC, site and severity of hemorrhage or thrombosis and hemodynamics and other appropriate clinical parameters. At present, treatment of the triggering event, low-dose heparin or antithrombin concentrate and wise choice of components when indicated appear to be the most effective modes of therapy.

Syndromes of disseminated intravascular coagulation in obstetrics, pregnancy, and gynecology. Objective criteria for diagnosis and management

This article presents current understanding of the causes, pathophysiology, clinical, and laboratory diagnosis, and management of fulminant and low-grade DIC, as they apply to obstetric, pregnant, and gynecologic patients. General medical complications leading to DIC, which may often be seen in these patients, are also discussed. Considerable attention has been given to interrelationships within the hemostasis system. Only by clearly understanding these pathophysiologic interrelationships can the obstetrician/gynecologist appreciate the divergent and wide spectrum of often confusing clinical and laboratory findings in patients with DIC. Objective clinical and laboratory criteria for diagnosis of DIC have been outlined to eliminate unnecessary confusion and the need to make empiric decisions regarding the diagnosis. Particularly in the obstetric patient, if a condition is observed that is associated with DIC, or if any suspicion of DIC arises from either clinical or laboratory findings, it is imperative to monitor the patient carefully with clinical and laboratory tools to assess any progression to a catastrophic event. In most instances of DIC in obstetric patients, the disease can be ameliorated easily at early stages. Many therapeutic decisions are straightforward, particularly in obstetric and gynecologic patients. For more serious and complicated cases of DIC in these patients, however, efficacy and choices of therapy will remain unclear until more information is published regarding response rates and survival patterns. Also, therapy must be highly individualized according to the nature of DIC, patient's age, origin of DIC, site and severity of hemorrhage or thrombosis, and hemodynamic and other clinical parameters. Finally, many syndromes that are often categorized as organ-specific disorders and are sometimes identified as independent disease entities, such as AFE syndrome, HELLP syndrome, adult shock lung syndrome, eclampsia, and many others, either share common pathophysiology with DIC or are simply a form of DIC. These entities represent the varied modes of clinical expression of DIC and illustrate the diverse clinical and anatomic manifestations of this syndrome.