Wavefront guided ablation

Correlation of higher order aberrations and components of astigmatism in myopic refractive surgery candidates

Purpose

To evaluate the correlation between refractive, corneal, and residual astigmatism and higher order aberrations (HOA) in refractive surgery candidates.

Methods

Three hundred and seventy-five eyes of 188 patients aged 28.2 ± 6.24 years with a predominance of females (62.7%) were enrolled in this study. Refraction, topography (Orbscan IIz, Bausch & Lomb, Rochester, NY, USA), and aberrometry (Zywave, Bausch & Lomb, Rochester, NY, USA) were performed to determine refractive and corneal astigmatism and HOA for all participants. Ocular residual astigmatism was calculated using vector analysis.

Results

The mean spherical equivalent was −3.59 ± 1.95 D and the mean refractive astigmatism was −1.97 ± 1.3 D. The mean HOA was 0.38 ± 0.15 μm in all cases, which increased with spherical equivalent (p < 0.05). There was a positive significant correlation between both corneal and refractive astigmatism and HOA (p < 0.05), but there was no significant correlation between residual astigmatism and HOA (p = 0.122).

Conclusion

The results of the study showed significant correlations between corneal and refractive astigmatisms and HOA.

Wavefront-guided versus wavefront-optimized laser in situ keratomileusis for patients with myopia: a prospective randomized contralateral eye study

PURPOSE

To compare the clinical outcomes of wavefront-guided and wavefront-optimized laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK).

DESIGN

Prospective, randomized, fellow-eye-controlled study.

METHODS

The setting was a single academic institution. The study population included 110 eyes of 55 patients with myopia with and without astigmatism. One eye of each patient was randomized to undergo wavefront-guided LASIK by the AMO Visx CustomVue S4 IR excimer laser system; the fellow eye received wavefront-optimized LASIK by the Alcon Allegretto Wave Eye-Q 400 Hz excimer laser system. Corneal flaps were constructed using the Intralase FS 60 Hz femtosecond laser. Patients were followed at postoperative months 1, 3, 6, and 12. The study's main outcome measures were uncorrected visual acuity, stability of refractive correction, contrast sensitivity, and wavefront aberrometry.

RESULTS

After 12 months, LASIK eyes had achieved visual acuity of 20/12.5 or better (30 eyes, 56%) in the wavefront-guided group compared to those receiving wavefront-optimized treatment (22 eyes, 41%) (P = 0.016). Average spherical equivalent refractions were -0.13 ± 0.46 diopters in wavefront-guided eyes whereas in wavefront-optimized eyes the refractions were -0.41 ± 0.38 diopters at 12 months. Wavefront-guided eyes also achieved better best-corrected visual acuity at both the 5% and 25% contrast levels (P = 0.022 and P = 0.004, respectively). There were no differences in levels of residual astigmatism (P = 0.798) or in higher order aberrations (P = 0.869).

CONCLUSIONS

Both wavefront-guided and wavefront-optimized treatments are able to correct myopia safely and effectively in eyes with and without astigmatism. However, wavefront-guided treatment platforms appear to offer significant advantages in terms of residual refractive error, uncorrected distance acuity and contrast sensitivity.

Analysis of four aberrometers for evaluating lower and higher order aberrations

PURPOSE

To compare the measurements of lower and higher order aberrations (HOA) of 4 commonly used aberrometers.

SETTING

Massachusetts Eye & Ear Infirmary, Boston, USA.

DESIGN

Prospective, cross-sectional study, in a controlled, single-blinded fashion.

METHODS

Multiple readings were obtained in 42 eyes of 21 healthy volunteers, at a single visit, with each of the following aberrometers: Alcon LADARWave®, Visx WaveScan®, B & L Zywave®, and Wavelight Allegro Analyzer®. Results were compared and analyzed in regards to the lower and HOA, to the different wavefront sensing devices and software, Tscherning and Hartmann-Shack and between the Fourier and Zernike algorithms. Statistical analysis included Bland-Altman plots, Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC), multiple comparison tests with Analysis of Variance and Kruskal-Wallis. Significant level was set to p<0.05 and alpha level correction was adjusted under the Bonferroni criteria.

RESULTS

Most measurements of all 4 aberrometers were comparable. However, statistically significant differences were found between the aberrometers in total HOA (tHOA), spherical aberration (SA), horizontal coma and astigmatism (2,2). LADARwave and Wavescan showed significant differences in tHOA (P<0.001, ICC = 0.549, LoA = 0.19±0.5) and in SA (P<0.001, ICC = 0.733, LoA = 0.16±0.37). Wavescan showed a significant difference compared to Zywave (p<0.001, ICC = 0.920, LoA = 0.09±0.13) in SA. Comparisons between Allegro Analyzer and Zywave demonstrated significant differences in both Horizontal Coma (3,1) (p<0.001, ICC = -0.207, LoA = -0.15±0.48) and Astigmatism (2,2) (P = 0.003, ICC = -0.965, LoA = 0.2±2.5). Allegro Analyzer also differed from Wavescan in Horizontal Coma (3,1) (P<0.001, ICC = 0.725, LoA = -0.07±0.25).

CONCLUSIONS

Although some measurements were comparable predominately in the lower order aberrations, significant differences were found in the tHOA, SA, horizontal coma and astigmatism. Our analysis suggests that sensor design contributes to agreement in lower order aberrations, and Fourier and Zernike expansion might disagree in higher order aberrations. Therefore, comparison between aberrometers was generally possible with some exceptions in higher order measurements.

Aspheric wavefront-guided versus wavefront-guided LASIK for myopic astigmatism with the Technolas 217z100 excimer laser

PURPOSE

To compare clinical outcomes of wavefront-guided LASIK with and without aspheric compensation in myopic eyes.

METHODS

In this observational, single-center study, 134 eyes were treated using an aspheric module in combination with wavefront-guided profiles (PTA-algorithm) and compared to 146 eyes treated with the predecessor wavefront-guided software (APT) that has no aspheric compensation. All treatment plans included the Rochester nomogram that accounts for the preoperative manifest refraction and interaction of higher order aberrations. Active eye-tracking (including cyclorotational movements) was utilized during photoablation.

RESULTS

Results at the 3-month follow-up: 67 % of PTA-treated eyes and 39 % of APT-treated eyes achieved an uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) of 20/20 or better. Change in mean higher order aberration root-mean-square (HOA RMS) after PTA treatments was not statistically significant (p = 0.18). The increase in HOA RMS after APT treatments was statistically significant (p = 0.003). Change in mean postop spherical aberration (SA) after PTA treatments was not statistically significant (p = 0.27). The change in SA after APT treatments was statistically significant (p = 0.001). In both cohorts, mean uncorrected low-contrast visual acuity was statistically not different to preoperative corrected values.

CONCLUSIONS

Adding an aspheric compensation to wavefront-guided myopic LASIK statistically improved clinical results in terms of visual acuity and refractive outcomes. Low-contrast visual acuity was not negatively affected in either group. While in APT-treated eyes mean HOA RMS and mean SA were significantly increased postoperatively, PTA-treated eyes showed neither induced HOA RMS nor induced SA.

Efficacy, predictability, and safety of wavefront-guided refractive laser treatment: metaanalysis

PURPOSE

To compare the efficacy, predictability, safety, and induced higher-order aberrations (HOAs) between wavefront-guided and non-wavefront-guided ablations.

SETTING

Division of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.

DESIGN

Metaanalysis.

METHODS

The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMED, and EMBASE were searched for randomized controlled trails. Trials meeting the selection criteria were quality appraised and data extracted by 2 independent authors. Measures of association were pooled quantitatively using metaanalytical methods. Comparison between wavefront-guided and non-wavefront-guided ablations was measured as pooled odds ratios (ORs) or weighted mean differences. The pooled ORs and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were computed for efficacy, safety, and predictability. The weighted mean difference and 95% CIs were used to compare induced HOAs.

RESULTS

Eight trials involving 955 eyes were included. After wavefront-guided LASIK, the pooled OR of achieving uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) of 20/20 (efficacy) was 1.10 (95% CI, 0.66-1.83; P=.72), the pooled OR of achieving a result within ± 0.50 diopter of intended target (predictability) was 1.03 (95% CI, 0.60-1.75; P=.92), and the weighted mean difference in induced HOAs was -0.09 (95% CI, -0.17 to -0.01; P=.04). No study reported loss of 2 or more lines of Snellen acuity (safety) with either modality.

CONCLUSIONS

Metaanalysis showed no clear evidence of a benefit of wavefront-guided over non-wavefront-guided ablations. However, there was a lack of standardized reporting of UDVA better than 20/20, which might mask an advantage in wavefront-guided treatment. With high preexisting HOAs, wavefront-guided has advantages over non-wavefront-guided treatment.

Influence of mydriatic eye drops on wavefront sensing with the Zywave aberrometer

PURPOSE

To investigate a potential influence of mydriatic eye drops on wavefront sensing with the Zywave aberrometer (Technolas Perfect Vision) in terms of predicted phoropter refraction (PPR) and higher order aberrations (HOA).

METHODS

In this prospective study, 200 myopic eyes were measured in miosis and pharmacologically induced mydriasis with an aberrometer and automated refraction. One hundred eyes were dilated with tropicamide 0.5%+phenylephrine 2.5% eye drops (tropicamide/phenylephrine group), and the remaining 100 eyes with tropicamide 0.5% (tropicamide only group). The PPR values for a pupil diameter of 3.5 mm in miosis and mydriasis, respectively, were compared and correlated to the corresponding values of automated refraction. Changes in HOAs up to the 4th order were recorded.

RESULTS

Predicted phoropter refraction values obtained in mydriasis were less myopic than in miosis. The spherical equivalent refraction of PPR differed by an average of 0.36 ± 0.36 diopters (D) in the tropicamide/phenylephrine group. In the tropicamide only group, the difference was 0.24 ± 0.43 D. Sphere of PPR differed by an average of 0.33 ± 0.36 D in the tropicamide/phenylephrine group and by an average of 0.24 ± 0.35 D in the tropicamide only group. Patient age had no major influence on the level of difference. Automated refraction yielded a smaller difference in spherical equivalent refraction. Changes in HOA root-mean-square were statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

The cycloplegic effect of mydriatic eye drops should be taken into account when interpreting aberration measurements and planning a wavefront-guided ablation. Ideally, the use of mydriatic eye drops should be avoided to minimize refractive surprises.

Conventional versus custom ablation in photorefractive keratectomy: randomized clinical trial

PURPOSE

To compare visual outcomes and changes in total higher-order aberrations (HOAs) between conventional photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) and custom PRK SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, Labbafinejad Medical Center, Ophthalmic Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences and Negah Eye Center, Tehran, Iran.

METHODS

This clinical trial comprised eyes having bilateral myopic PRK with the Technolas 217z excimer machine. One eye had conventional ablation (conventional group) and the other eye, wavefront-guided custom treatment (custom group). Changes in postoperative visual acuity, cycloplegic refraction, contrast sensitivity function, and root mean square higher-order aberrations (RMS HOAs) were compared between the 2 groups.

RESULTS

The mean age of the 28 patients (56 eyes) was 26.7 years. The mean preoperative cycloplegic spherical equivalent refractive error was -4.92 diopters (D) +/- 1.6 (SD) and the mean refractive astigmatism, 0.91 +/- 1.0 D. There was no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups in preoperative cycloplegic refractive error, HOAs, or contrast sensitivity function. The mean follow-up was 8.1 +/- 3.3 months. The increase in RMS HOAs from preoperatively to postoperatively was statistically significantly higher in the custom group in the 6.0 mm zone (P = .03) but not in the 4.0 mm zone (P = .26). The decrease in low mesopic contrast sensitivity function was statistically significant in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The RMS HOAs significantly increased after PRK with both methods. The results suggest that custom ablation is more sensitive to optical zone (OZ) size and may yield more aberrations with an OZ smaller than 6.0 mm.

Effect of higher order aberrations on contrast sensitivity function in myopic eyes

PURPOSE

To evaluate the relation between higher order aberrations (HOAs) and contrast sensitivity function (CSF) in a population with myopia.

METHODS

In this case series, HOAs were measured in 70 myopic eyes over a 6-mm pupil. Contrast sensitivity was also measured. From the contrast sensitivity data, the area under the log contrast sensitivity function (AULCSF) was calculated. Pupil diameter was measured under photopic conditions.

RESULTS

Seventy right eyes of 70 myopic subjects with a mean age of 26.6 +/- 5.7 years were studied. The mean spherical equivalent and refractive astigmatism were -4.97 +/- 1.6 D and 0.93 +/- 0.5 D, respectively. AULCSF was significantly but negatively correlated with the cycloplegic spherical equivalent (r (2) = 0.57, P = 0.02), the root mean square (RMS) of total HOAs (r (2) = 0.065, P = 0.03), the RMS of fourth-order aberrations (r (2) = 0.089, P = 0.015), and the RMS of the spherical aberration (r (2) = 0.037, P = 0.004). AULCSF did not have any significant association with age, photopic pupil diameter, refractive astigmatism, or the RMS of the coma aberration.

CONCLUSION

Spherical and fourth-order aberrations significantly affect CSF in myopic eyes. However, the effect of myopia on CSF cannot be attributed only to HOAs. Other factors such as neural elements in the visual pathway should be taken into account.

Changes of higher-order aberrations with the use of various mydriatics

Advances in corneal refractive surgery have allowed ophthalmologists to correct ocular higher-order aberrations. To obtain more information on the ocular aberrations generated from the optical axis, mydriasis is required. The aim of this study is to evaluate the changes in higher-order aberrations with the use of various mydriatics. Higher-order aberrations were measured in 21 eyes of 21 subjects (age range 24-37 years; 13 males, 8 females). Repeated measurements were conducted before and after the installation of three different mydriatics: 10% phenylephrine, 1% tropicamide, or 1% cyclopentolate. At a pupil size of 6 mm, the average root mean square value of higher-order aberrations (HO-RMS) was 0.430 mum in undilated eyes, and 0.413, 0.410, and 0.477 mum after installation of phenylephrine, tropicamide, and cyclopentolate, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in the HO-RMS between the four conditions. There was a significant difference in the spherical aberration between the undilated or phenylephrine-treated eyes, compared to those treated with tropicamide or cyclopentolate. Cycloplegic mydriatics seemed to shift spherical aberration in a positive direction. These results suggest that mydriatics may affect higher-order aberrations, especially spherical aberration, and this should be considered when performing wavefront analysis and when correcting wavefront errors.

Effect of Hormone Replacement Therapy in Women on Ocular Refractive Status and Aberrations

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effects of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) on refractive status, corneal topography, and aberrations of the eye in postmenopausal women.

METHODS

Thirty-six healthy postmenopausal women (72 eyes) were included in the study. All patients received HRT that consisted of 0.625 mg/day conjugated estrogen and 5 mg/day medroxyprogesterone acetate in a continuous combined regimen. Schirmer II test and tear film break-up time (BUT) were performed on all patients at the time of enrollment and 6 months after initiation of HRT. Refractive status, corneal topography, and wavefront aberrations were evaluated with the NIDEK Optical Path Difference-Scan before and 6 months after HRT was initiated.

RESULTS

Mean patient age was 50.8 +/- 2.6 years (range: 47 to 57 years). The mean duration of menopause was 2.7 +/- 0.8 years (range: 1.4 to 3.5 years). The Schirmer II test and tear film BUT measurements were significantly lower after HRT (P < .05). Before HRT, the mean spherical equivalent refraction was -0.19 +/- 1.79 diopters (D) (range: -4.38 to +3.00 D). After HRT, the mean spherical equivalent refraction was -0.22 +/- 1.81 D (range: -4.63 to +/- 2.63 D). No significant differences were noted between refractive status, corneal topography, and wavefront aberrations of eyes of patients before and 6 months after HRT (P > .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Hormone replacement therapy in postmenopausal women does not significantly affect refractive status, corneal topography, and wavefront aberrations of the eye at 6-month follow-up.

Changes of Ocular Higher Order Aberration in On- and Off-Eye of Rigid Gas Permeable Contact Lenses

PURPOSE

To investigate ocular higher order aberration (HOA) changes caused by rigid gas permeable (RGP) contact lens (CL) wear.

METHODS

Twenty-two eyes of 22 myopic patients and 14 eyes of 14 keratoconic patients who were fitted with an RGP CL were enrolled to examine ocular HOAs using a Hartmann-Shack wavefront sensor before and after RGP wear. Root mean square (RMS) values and Zernike coefficients in RGP-on and RGP-off eyes were compared for both myopic and keratoconic eyes, or between patient groups divided according to their prefitted total HOA value (RMS<0.33 microm or>or=0.33 microm in myopic eyes and RMS<0.46 microm or>or=0.46 microm in keratoconic eyes). All HOA values were recomputed for a 4-mm pupil for comparison purposes.

RESULTS

In keratoconic eyes, RGP CL changed the direction of vertical coma from -0.185 to 0.134 microm (p=0.024). In the low HOA myopic group, total HOA increased from 0.23 to 0.35 microm (p=0.006) by RGP CL wear, mainly due to increased coma aberration from 0.0951 to 0.2146 microm (p=0.006). The direction of vertical coma changed from the inferior to superior cornea in the low HOA group (p=0.020). In the high HOA keratoconic group, total HOA decreased from 0.54 to 0.36 microm (p=0.049), and the direction of the vertical coma changed from the inferior to superior cornea (p=0.049).

CONCLUSIONS

RGP CL wear may enhance or reduce HOA based on original existing ocular aberration mainly through directional changes in vertical coma.

Shack-Hartmann-Based Wavefront Analyzer for Calibrating Excimer Lasers

PURPOSE

Currently, refractive surgical excimer laser systems are calibrated by ablating plastic lenses, which are measured by lensometer and analyzed by a technician. The accuracy of this method is approximately 0.25 diopters (D) in sphere and cylinder power. Theoretically, objective calibration using wavefront technology would be significantly more accurate, thereby improving surgical outcomes. This study describes a Shack-Hartmann-based instrument, which has been developed to measure ablated plastic lenses for calibration and quality control of the excimer laser.

METHODS

A calibration instrument comprising an LED source at 640 nm, a lenslet array, beam-guiding optics, and a CCD camera was designed to perform full wavefront analysis. The measurement plane is conjugate to the lenslet array plane, and the diameter of the pupil is 5 mm. Accuracy was determined by measuring a set of well-calibrated spherical and cylindrical glass lenses. Plastic lenses were ablated, and high-precision measurements were performed by surface profile scanner.

RESULTS

In the power range of -6.00 to +4.00 D, repeatability exceeded 0.01 D, accuracy of measurement exceeded 0.04 D, and 10 for the axis of cylinder lenses. The measurement of excimer-ablated plastic lenses agreed with high-precision surface profile scanner measurements within 0.10 D, and repeatability exceeded 0.01 D.

CONCLUSIONS

Wavefront technology-based, high-precision measurement of calibration lenses can more accurately set the energy of the excimer laser, which enhances the accuracy of refractive laser correction. In automating calibration, the new instrument removes operator subjectivity and decreases the time needed for calibration.

Higher Order Aberrations in Normal Eyes Measured With Three Different Aberrometers

PURPOSE

To assess the repeatability of measurements of higher order aberrations using three different aberrometers and to compare higher order aberration measurements between optical path difference (OPD) scanning and the Hartmann-Shack method.

METHODS

Wavefront aberration data obtained using the NIDEK OPD-Scan, Bausch & Lomb Zywave wavefront aberrometer, and VISX CustomVue wavefront analyzer were compared. A total of 19 subjects were included in the study. The repeatability in each machine was assessed by calculating the difference between measurements and the mean of three consecutive measurements in the same eye. Subsequent analysis of the distribution of these differences yields the mean difference, the standard deviation of the differences, and the 95% confidence interval for repeated measurements, also termed the "repeatability coefficient".

RESULTS

Repeatability errors in all three machines were found to be low, suggesting that all three machines are reliable in their repeated measurements. Significant differences were demonstrated between OPD scanning and Hartmann-Shack aberrometers. All three machines showed statistically significant differences in several higher order aberration parameters when compared to each other.

CONCLUSIONS

The three different aberrometers provided repeatable measurements but statistical differences were noted in the measurement of higher order aberrations when comparing the machines. No instrument was superior over the other and all three were reliable.

Zyoptix wavefront-guided versus standard photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) in low and moderate myopia: randomized controlled 6-month study

PURPOSE

To evaluate the refractive and aberrometric outcome of wavefront-guided photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) compared to standard PRK in myopic patients.

METHODS

Fifty-six eyes of 56 patients were included in the study and were randomly divided into two groups. The study group consisted of 28 eyes with a mean spherical equivalent (SE) of -2.25+/-0.76 diopters (D) (range: -1.5 to -3.5 D) treated with wavefront-guided PRK using the Zywave ablation profile and the Bausch & Lomb Technolas 217z excimer laser (Zyoptix system) and the control group included 28 eyes with a SE of -2.35+/-1.01 D (range: -1.5 to -3.5 D) treated with standard PRK (PlanoScan ablation) using the same laser. A Zywave aberrometer was used to analyze and calculate the root-mean-square (RMS) of total high order aberrations (HOA) and Zernike coefficients of third and fourth order before and after (over a 6-month follow-up period) surgery in both groups. Preoperative and postoperative SE, un-corrected visual acuity (UCVA), and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) were evaluated in all cases.

RESULTS

There was a high correlation between achieved and intended correction. The differences between the two treatment groups were not statistically significant for UCVA, BCVA, or SE cycloplegic refraction . Postoperatively the RMS value of high order aberrations was raised in both groups. At 6-month control, on average it increased by a factor of 1.17 in the Zyoptix PRK group and 1.54 in the PlanoScan PRK group (p=0.22). In the Zyoptix group there was a decrease of coma aberration, while in the PlanoScan group this third order aberration increased. The difference between postoperative and preoperative values between the two groups was statistically significant for coma aberration (p=0.013). No statistically significant difference was observed for spherical-like aberration between the two groups. In the study group eyes with a low amount of preoperative aberrations (HOA RMS lower than the median value; <0.28 microm) showed an increase of HOA RMS while eyes with RMS higher than 0.28 microm showed a decrease (p<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Zyoptix wavefront-guided PRK is as safe and efficacious for the correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism as PlanoScan PRK. Moreover this technique induces a smaller increase of third order coma aberration compared to standard PRK. The use of Zyoptix wavefront-guided PRK is particularly indicated in eyes with higher preoperative RMS values.

Intensity analysis of Hartmann-Shack images in cataractous, keratoconic, and normal eyes to investigate light scattering

PURPOSE

A clinical investigation of novel methods for evaluating light scattering using a Hartmann-Shack aberrometer.

METHODS

Aberrometry was performed on normal eyes (n=7; patient age, 26.7+/-2.5 years, mean+/-SD), eyes with keratoconus (n=22; patient age, 26.1+/-8.1 years), and eyes with cataract (n=17; patient age, 56.5+/-16.9 years) using a Hartmann-Shack wavefront aberrometer. We introduced two methods: (1) a contrast method, in which we calculated the inverse of contrast of the local images around 12 spots in a Hartmann-Shack image, and (2) a difference of point spread function (PSF) method, in which we analyzed the difference between the width of the PSF computed with aberration information and the width of the measured PSF, which contains both aberration and light scattering information.

RESULTS

The inverse contrast in cataractous eyes (5.04+/-3.06 inverse contrast units) was significantly larger than that in normal eyes (1.57+/-0.56) or keratoconic eyes (1.83+/-0.79). The difference of PSF in cataractous eyes (81.8+/-65.2 microm) was also significantly larger than that in normal eyes (9.3+/-4.3 microm) or keratoconic eyes (30.0+/-20.1 microm). The inverse contrast and the difference in the PSF were highly correlated (r=0.89, P<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

The two methods introduced here successfully distinguished cataractous eyes from normal and keratoconic eyes. After the results were analyzed by a discriminant analysis, the separation of the three categories proved to be excellent.

Effects of interactions among wave aberrations on optical image quality

Wave aberrations degrade the optical quality of the eye relative to the diffraction limit, but there are situations in which having slightly aberrated optics can provide some relative visual benefits. This fact led us to consider whether interactions among aberrations in the eye's wavefront produce an advantage for image quality relative to wavefronts with randomized combinations of aberrations with the same total RMS error. Total ocular wave aberrations from two experimental groups and corneal wave aberrations from one group were measured and expressed as Zernike polynomial expansions through the seventh-order. In a series of Monte Carlo simulations, modulation transfer functions (MTFs) for the measured wave aberrations were compared to distributions of artificial MTFs for wavefronts created by randomizing the sign or orientation of the aberrations, while maintaining the RMS error within each Zernike order. In a control condition, "synthetic" model eyes were produced by choosing each individual aberration term at random from individuals in the experimental group, and again MTFs were compared for original and randomized signs. Results were summarized by the MTF ratio: real MTF/mean simulated MTF, as a function of spatial frequency. For a 6mm pupil, the mean MTF ratio for total ocular aberrations was greater than 1.0 up to 60 cycles per degree, suggesting that the eye's aberrations are not independent and that there may be a positive functional consequences to their interrelations. This positive relation did not hold for corneal aberrations alone, or for the synthetic eyes.

Conventional and wavefront-guided myopic LASIK retreatment

PURPOSE

To assess the clinical outcomes of conventional and wavefront-guided myopic laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) retreatment.

DESIGN

Retrospective, nonrandomized case series.

METHODS

The study comprised a cohort of 97 eyes having LASIK retreatment for residual myopia after primary LASIK. The eyes were divided into two groups: conventional retreatment (CR) group (n = 74) and wavefront-guided retreatment (WR) group (n = 23). The retreatment LASIK was performed using LADARVison 4000 with/without CustomCornea (Alcon Surgical, Orlando, Florida, USA). The mean follow-up was 8.9 +/- 5.8 months after retreatment (range three to thirty-six months).

RESULTS

The mean pre-retreatment spherical equivalent (SE) was -0.93 +/- 0.41 diopters in the CR group and -0.84 +/- 0.48 diopters in the WR group (P = .409). At the last visit, the mean SE was -0.19 +/- 0.28 diopters and +0.32 +/- 0.47 diopters, respectively (P < .001). An SE of +/- 0.50 diopters was achieved in 92% (68 of 74) of CR eyes and 65% (15 of 23) of WR eyes. In the CR group, 85% eyes had a uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) > or = 20/20 and 99% > or = 20/40, and in the WR group, 35% and 100%, respectively. None of the CR eyes and 17% (4 of 23) of WR eyes lost two lines of best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA). Nine percent (7 of 74) of CR eyes and 30% of WR eyes (7 of 23) had optical symptoms before retreatment, the number was reduced to 1% (1 of 74) and 4% (1 of 23), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In the study period with the current equipment, our results showed that conventional LASIK retreatment was superior to wavefront-guided LASIK retreatment in both efficacy and safety.

Wavefront-guided ablation: evidence for efficacy compared to traditional ablation

PURPOSE

To provide an evidence-based overview of wavefront-guided refractive surgery outcomes, benefits, and limitations.

DESIGN

Literature review.

METHODS

Review of FDA study reports and indexed, peer-reviewed literature.

RESULTS

More than 400 reports investigating wavefront applications in refractive surgery exist, but studies comparing the outcomes of wavefront-guided treatment with conventional treatment are few in number. Available studies do not overwhelmingly demonstrate superior visual results attributable to a wavefront-guided approach.

CONCLUSIONS

While wavefront-guided refractive surgery provides excellent results, evidence is limited that it outperforms conventional laser in situ keratomileusis that incorporates broad ablation zones, smoothing to the periphery, eye-trackers, and other technological refinements. However, it is evident that wavefront-customized ablation holds a promising future and merits ongoing investigation.

Wavefront-guided correction of ocular aberrations: are phase plate and refractive surgery solutions equal?

Wavefront-guided laser eye surgery has been recently introduced and holds the promise of correcting not only defocus and astigmatism in patients but also higher-order aberrations. Research is just beginning on the implementation of wavefront-guided methods in optical solutions, such as phase-plate-based spectacles, as alternatives to surgery. We investigate the theoretical differences between the implementation of wavefront-guided surgical and phase plate corrections. The residual aberrations of 43 model eyes are calculated after simulated refractive surgery and also after a phase plate is placed in front of the untreated eye. In each case, the current wavefront-guided paradigm that applies a direct map of the ocular aberrations to the correction zone is used. The simulation results demonstrate that an ablation map that is a Zernike fit of a direct transform of the ocular wavefront phase error is not as efficient in correcting refractive errors of sphere, cylinder, spherical aberration, and coma as when the same Zernike coefficients are applied to a phase plate, with statistically significant improvements from 2% to 6%.

Wavefront Analysis in Normal Refractive Surgery Candidates

PURPOSE

To quantify the higher order aberrations of refractive surgery candidates and compare the wavefront-determined refractions with manifest refractions refined with a +/- 0.25 Jackson cross cylinder.

METHODS

Results of 226 consecutive patients (418 eyes) were analyzed with the WaveScan WavePrint system (VISX, Santa Clara, Calif). Only patients with normal eyes without previous surgery were included.

RESULTS

The mean spherical equivalent refraction determined with wavefront analysis was -3.40 +/- 3.14 diopters (D) (range: -10.72 to +5.41 D). The largest amount of higher order aberrations was detected with : a 6-mm pupil diameter (coma 0.14 +/- 0.08 microm; trefoil 0.10 +/- 0.07 microm; spherical aberrations 0.09 +/- 0.07 microm). The mean root-mean-square of higher order aberrations and total aberrations were 0.23 +/- 0.11 microm and 4.00 +/- 2.45 microm, respectively. No statistically significant correlation was noted between higher order aberrations and gender (P = 0.7) or between higher order aberration and refractive level (P > .59). The mean differences in spherical equivalent refraction, sphere, and cylinder between WaveScan measurements and manifest refraction were 0.36 +/- 0.41 D, 0.40 +/- 0.44 D, and 0.28 +/- 0.32 D, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides reference values for higher order aberrations in normal refractive surgery candidates. Wavefront analysis also proved to be a valuable tool for objectively measuring preoperative refractive error.

Conservation of corneal tissue with wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis

PURPOSE

To determine whether corneal tissue can be conserved with wavefront-guided ablation compared to conventional surgery with a larger ablation zone for attempted prevention of glare and halo.

SETTING

Department of Ophthalmology, Ilsan Paik Hospital, Inje University, Korea.

METHODS

This prospective study was composed of 2 parts: First, 40 eyes of 20 patients were studied to determine whether a larger optical ablation could be beneficial in prevention of glare after conventional laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) surgery. One eye in each patient was treated with a 6.00 mm optical zone, and the other with a 6.25 mm optical zone. Second, 20 eyes of 10 patients with a higher-order root mean square (RMS) value of 0.3 or greater were evaluated to learn whether a wavefront-guided ablation could be as effective as a larger conventional optical ablation. One eye in each patient was treated by conventional LASIK surgery with a 6.25 mm optical zone, and the other eye was treated by wavefront-guided LASIK surgery with a 6.00 mm optical zone. All patients were analyzed with a WASCA analyzer (Carl Zeiss Meditec) preoperatively, and 1 month and 3 months after surgery.

RESULTS

Higher-order aberrations including coma, spherical aberration, and higher-order RMS were statistically significantly increased after conventional surgery with both a 6.00 mm and 6.25 mm optical zone. High-order aberrations including comaer- and spherical aberration after conventional surgery with 6.25 mm zone were statistically significantly increased. However, coma and higher-order RMS did not show a statistically significant increase between pre-LASIK and post-LASIK in wavefront-ablated eyes with a 6.00 mm optical zone.

CONCLUSION

Wavefront ablation showed less increase of coma and higher-order RMS regardless of a smaller optical zone. This finding might provide a clinical clue for an advantage of wavefront-guided ablation from the standpoint of corneal tissue conservation.

[Current state of wavefront guided corneal surgery to correct refraction disorders]

The present review describes the current status of wavefront-guided corneal surgery and up-to-date results. Wavefront-guided LASIK procedures performed to date achieved uncorrected vision of i.o or better in a larger number of patients than with conventional LASIK surgery, but the "eagle eye" has remained the exception. In part of the patients reductions of higher order aberrations could be obtained, but in the majority of ca-ses an increase was observed. This increase was however less than with conventional LASIK surgery. Correction of higher order aberrations has not yet been perfected since the predictability of corrections appears to be deserving of improvement on the one hand and aberrations are still induced by the technique on the other hand.

Long Term Analysis of LASIK for the Correction of Refractive Errors After Penetrating Keratoplasty

PURPOSE

To determine the long-term safety and effectiveness of laser in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK) in the treatment of refractive errors following penetrating keratoplasty (PK).

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed of 57 eyes of 48 patients with anisometropia or high astigmatism who were unable to wear glasses or a contact lens after PK and who underwent LASIK for visual rehabilitation. Uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and corneal transplant integrity were recorded before surgery as well as up to 60 months after LASIK.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up after the LASIK was 21.4 +/- 14.2 months (range 3 to 60 months). Mean preoperative spherical equivalent (SE) was -4.19 +/- 3.38 D. The mean preoperative astigmatism was 4.67 +/- 2.18 D. Preoperative BCVA was 20/40 or better in 42 eyes (74%). At 2 years the mean SE was -0.61 +/- 1.81 D, and mean astigmatism was 1.94 +/- 1.35 D for the 28 eyes with follow-up. UCVA was 20/40 or better in 12 eyes (43%), and BCVA was 20/40 or better in 24 eyes (86%) at 2 years. A gain in BCVA of 1 line or more was seen in 8 eyes (29%). Two eyes (7%) had loss of 2 or more lines of BCVA at 2 years. There were 9 eyes (16%) that developed epithelial ingrowth. Five eyes (9%) in this series had repeat corneal transplants.

CONCLUSIONS

LASIK is effective for reducing ametropia after PK. Proper patient counseling is necessary because the results of LASIK after PK are not as good as, and complications are more frequent than in eyes with naturally occurring myopia and astigmatism. Complications are especially common in patients with mismatch of the donor and host cornea or in those with poor endothelial cell function.

LADARWave Wavefront Measurement in Normal Eyes

PURPOSE

We evaluated the correlation of Alcon LADARWave wavefront measurements with clinical refraction and corneal topography.

METHODS

In a retrospective, non-comparative case series, 60 eyes (30 patients) of healthy individuals evaluated by preoperative examination for refractive surgery were enrolled (manifest sphere, -11.00 to +4.50 D; manifest cylinder, 0 to -4.75 D; 45 eyes were myopic, 12 eyes were hyperopic, and 3 had mixed astigmatism). Correlation of manifest refraction, cycloplegic refraction, and topographic data with wavefront refraction and higher order aberration was assessed. Match percentage given by the wavefront was analyzed. This number represents how much of the wavefront refraction is due to sphere and cylinder (high percentage match) or is influenced by higher order aberration (low percentage match), in which case aberrometer refraction will not be close to phoropter refraction. Pearson's correlation coefficient was assessed for two continuous variables, adjusting for repeated measurements.

RESULTS

The median match percentage was 91%. Mean values for all higher order aberration components in a 7.0-mm pupil were: coma = 0.35 +/- 0.29 microm, spherical aberrations = 0.36 +/- 0.31 microm, and other terms of higher order aberrations = 0.31 +/- 0.14 microm. Wavefront sphere, cylinder, and axis terms were highly correlated to manifest and cycloplegic measurements. The high match subgroup had a higher correlation coefficient than the low match subgroup for refraction. Topographic cylinder and axis were not strongly correlated to wavefront refraction, but manifest axis was significantly correlated to topographic axis.

CONCLUSION

In 60 normal eyes, the Alcon LADARWave wavefront measurement was highly correlated with refraction, but less well with corneal topography.

In vivo and in vitro repeatability of Hartmann-Shack aberrometry

PURPOSE

To assess the in vivo and in vitro repeatability of objective refraction and higher-order aberrations (HOAs) measured by a commercially available Hartmann-Shack wavefront sensor.

SETTING

Department of Ophthalmology, Johann-Wolfgang-Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.

METHODS

After pupil dilation of 40 myopic or myopic, astigmatic eyes of 20 patients, wavefront measurements were performed 6 times in each eye and in a test object provided by the manufacturer by 2 experienced examiners using a Hartmann-Shack wavefront sensor (Zywave, software version 3.21, Bausch & Lomb). The mean standard deviation (SD) and the coefficient of variation (CV) for sphere, cylinder, and each Zernike polynomial were computed for a 7.0 mm pupil diameter. Vector analysis was performed for the astigmatism. After the data were subdivided into 2 groups with 3 measurements in each, one measurement that best matched the subjective manifest refraction was chosen in each group and the difference between them was calculated.

RESULTS

The mean SD (CV) was 0.15 diopter (D) (7%) for the sphere value of the predicted phoropter refraction and 0.16 D (22%) for astigmatism. Thirty-two eyes had an axis deviation of at least 10 degrees. Vector analysis revealed a mean SD of 0.24@109.8. Other results for mean SD and mean CV were as follows: total in vivo higher-order RMS, 0.097 microm, 13.4%; sphere in myopic test device, 0.034 D, 0.65%; sphere in hyperopic test object, 0.035 D, 0.72%. The difference between the 2 best-matched refractions was significantly different from zero (0.11 D, P<.001). The CV was significantly higher for HOAs than for the 2nd-order aberrations (defocus and astigmatism).

CONCLUSIONS

Repeatability of Hartmann-Shack aberrometry by the Zywave wavefront sensor was not satisfactory, particularly for small amounts of HOAs. Under these conditions, aberrometry measurements should be repeated several times and outliers should be excluded in calculating the means.

Laser in-situ keratomileusis after penetrating keratoplasty

Laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) after penetrating keratoplasty has been used more commonly for the correction of myopia or myopic astigmatism and less so for hypermetropia or hyperopic astigmatism. The primary goal after LASIK in such cases is resolution of sufficient myopia and astigmatism to allow spectacle correction of the residual refractive error and decrease anisometropia. All sutures should be removed prior to LASIK and the interval between penetrating keratoplasty and LASIK should be a minimum of 1 year. Preoperative evaluation includes refraction, slit-lamp biomicroscopy, corneal topography, and specular microscopy. The technique of LASIK surgery after penetrating keratoplasty is similar to the standard procedure. However, many variations have been described. These include maneuvers during surgery such as augmentation with arcuate cuts on the stromal bed and topographically guided LASIK. Other variations are relaxing incisions followed by LASIK surgery and sequential treatment by LASIK, that is, raising of the flap as a first stage procedure followed by ablation if required, 4 to 6 weeks later after relifting the flap in the second stage. Improvement in both uncorrected visual acuity and spectacle-corrected visual acuity, as well as a decrease in spherical equivalent, cylinder, and anisometropia, has been reported in various studies. All grafts were clear and no occurrence of wound dehiscence has been reported. Intraoperative complications include hemorrhage, microkeratome failure, flap buttonhole, dislocation, and perforation. Postoperative complications include undercorrection, decentered ablation, and regression. Re-enhancements after LASIK following keratoplasty are possible with acceptable visual outcome.

Higher Order Ocular Aberrations After Cycloplegic and Non-cycloplegic Pupil Dilation

PURPOSE

Clinical aberrometry is commonly undertaken with the use of mydriatic agents, however there is no literature available on whether aberrometry results obtained under cycloplegia differ from those obtained without cycloplegia.

METHODS

Higher order aberrations were measured over a 6-mm pupil with a Bausch and Lomb Technolas Zywave Aberrometer on the right eyes of 31 young subjects (average age 19.7 +/- 1.7 years; 5 females, 16 males). Two measurement conditions were used for each subject: 1) topical installation of 3 drops 1% cyclopentolate hydrochloride; and 2) topical installation of 1 drop 2.5% phenylephrine hydrochloride, prior to aberrometry measurements.

RESULTS

For higher order aberrations (3rd to 5th order), average root mean square (RMS) after phenylephrine measurement (0.3852 microm) was significantly lower than after cyclopentolate (0.4259 microm). A small but statistically significant difference was found between the two conditions for average vertical and horizontal coma and, to a lesser extent, horizontal 5th order aberrations. Repeatability RMS, a measure of test-retest measurement repeatability, was similar for the two conditions at 0.15 microm, and significantly lower than the average RMS for the difference between the two conditions (residual RMS) of 0.22 microm.

CONCLUSIONS

The difference between cycloplegic and non-cycloplegic aberration measurements has implications for surgical correction of higher order aberrations.

Induced optical aberrations following formation of a laser in situ keratomileusis flap

PURPOSE

To determine how refractive error, visual acuity, and high-order aberrations (3rd- and 4th-order) are affected by the formation of a lamellar corneal flap during laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK).

SETTING

University refractive surgery center.

METHODS

The effect of lamellar corneal flap formation was analyzed in 15 myopic eyes (mean preoperative refraction -4.72 diopters [D] [range -1.25 to -7.25 D]). The flap was created using a 2-step procedure: (1). a nasally hinged lamellar corneal flap was created; (2). the flap was lifted and stromal ablation performed 2 months after the flap was made. A Hartmann-Shack aberrometer was used to measure the aberrations.

RESULTS

There was no significant change in the refractive error (spherical equivalent pre-flap -4.72 +/- 1.99 D and post-flap -4.62 +/- 1.99 D [P =.28]) or visual acuity (pre-flap uncorrected visual acuity [UCVA] 0.07 and best corrected visual acuity [BCVA] 0.96; post-flap UCVA 0.08 and BCVA 0.95 [P =.16 and P =.33, respectively]). A statistically significant increase in total higher-order wavefront aberrations was observed following flap formation (root mean square pre-flap 0.344 +/- 0.125 and post-flap 0.440 +/- 0.221 [P =.04]).

CONCLUSION

Flap formation during LASIK can modify the eye's existing natural higher-order aberrations (especially spherical and coma-like aberrations along the axis of the flap's hinge), while visual acuity and refractive error remain unaffected.