Evaluating pulsatile ocular blood flow analysis in normal and treated glaucomatous eyes

Ocular blood flow in steep Trendelenburg positioning during robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy

Purpose:

Several ischemic optic neuropathies that occurred during robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALRP) have been reported to be due to the Trendelenburg position, which lowers ocular perfusion pressure (OPP). We examined changes in pulsatile ocular blood flow (POBF) and its correlation with OPP during RALRP in the steep Trendelenburg position.

Methods:

Pulsatile ocular blood flow and intraocular pressure (IOP) were measured in 50 patients by the OBF Langham System 5 times during RALRP. The mean arterial blood pressure (MAP), heart rate, plateau airway pressure, and end-tidal CO2 (EtCO2) at each time point were recorded. Ocular perfusion pressure was calculated from simultaneous IOP and MAP measurements.

Results:

Pulsatile ocular blood flow was 15.53 ± 3.32 µL/s at T0, 18.99 ± 4.95 µL/s at T1, 10.04 ± 3.24 µL/s at T2, 11.45 ± 3.02 µL/s at T3, and 15.07 ± 3.81 µL/s at T4. Ocular perfusion pressure was 70.15 ± 5.98 mm Hg at T0, 64.21 ± 6.77 mm Hg at T1, 57.71 ± 7.07 mm Hg at T2, 51.73 ± 11.58 mm Hg at T3, and 64.21 ± 12.37 mm Hg at T4. Repeated-measures analysis of variance on POBF and OPP was significant (p>0.05). This difference disappeared when the correlation between MAP and POBF, EtCO2 and POBF, and EtCO2 and OPP were considered, while correlation between MAP and OPP confirmed the difference. The regression analysis between POBF and OPP showed a statistically significant difference at T0 and T3 (r = 0.047, p = 0.031 and r = 0.096, p = 0.002, respectively).

Conclusions:

Pulsatile ocular blood flow and OPP reached the lowest level at the end of surgery.

Oral Administration of Cilostazol Increases Ocular Blood Flow in Patients with Diabetic Retinopathy

PURPOSE

To investigate the effect of cilostazol on ocular hemodynamics and to determine whether the administration of cilostazol increases the ocular blood flow in patients with diabetic retinopathy.

METHODS

This prospective observational study investigated the effect of orally administered cilostazol on diabetic retinopathy. Before and after administration for 1 week, pulsatile ocular blood flow (POBF) and retrobulbar hemodynamics were measured using a POBF analyzer and transcranial Doppler imaging, respectively. Visual acuity, intraocular pressure, and blood pressure were also evaluated before and after treatment.

RESULTS

Twenty-five eyes of 25 patients were included in this study. POBF increased significantly (16.8 ± 4.6 µL/sec vs. 19.6 ± 6.2 µL/sec, p < 0.001) after administration of cilostazol, while no significant change was identified in visual acuity, intraocular pressure, and blood pressure. Mean flow velocity in the ophthalmic artery as measured with transcranial Doppler imaging also increased significantly after medication (23.5 ± 5.6 cm/sec vs. 26.0 ± 6.9 cm/sec, p = 0.001). The change in POBF directly correlated with the change in mean flow velocity (r = 0.419, p = 0.007).

CONCLUSIONS

Cilostazol was effective in increasing ocular blood flow in patients with diabetic retinopathy, possibly by modulating retrobulbar circulation.

Diurnal Curve of the Ocular Perfusion Pressure

Purpose: To describe the diurnal variation of the ocular perfusion pressure (OPP) in normal, suspects and glaucoma patients.

Materials and methods: Seventy-nine subjects were enrolled in a prospective study. The diurnal curve of intraocular pressure (IOP) was performed and blood pressure measurements were obtained. Each participant was grouped into one of the following based upon the clinical evaluation of the optic disk, IOP and standard achromatic perimetry (SAP): 18 eyes were classified as normal (normal SAP, normal optic disk evaluation and IOP < 21 mm Hg in two different measurements), 30 eyes as glaucoma suspect (GS) (normal SAP and mean deviation (MD), C/D ration > 0.5 or asymmetry > 0.2 and/or ocular hypertension), 31 eyes as early glaucoma (MD < -6 dB, glaucomatous optic neuropathy and SAP and MDs on SAP. Standard achromatic perimetry was performed with the Octopus 3.1.1 Dynamic 24-2 program. Intraocular pressure and blood pressure measurements were taken at 6 am, 9 am, 12, 3 and 6 pm. The patients stayed in the seated position for 5 minutes prior to blood pressure measurements.

Results: The mean IOP values in all groups did not follow any regular pattern. The peak IOP was found to be greater in suspect [18.70 ± 3.31 (mm Hg ± SD)] and glaucoma (18.77 ± 4.30 mm Hg) patients as compared to normal subjects (16.11 ± 2.27 mm Hg). In studying the diurnal variation of the OPP, we found lower values at 3 pm in normals (34.21 ± 2.07 mm Hg), at 9 am in suspects (54.35 ± 3.32 mm Hg) and at 12 pm in glaucoma patients (34.84 ± 1.44 mm Hg).

Conclusion: Each group has a specific OPP variation during the day with the most homogeneous group being the suspect one. It is important to keep studying the IOP and OPP variation for increased comprehension of the pathophysiology of glaucomatous optic neuropathy.

How to cite this article: Kanadani FN, Moreira TCA, Bezerra BSP, Vianello MP, Corradi J, Dorairaj SK, Prata TS. Diurnal Curve of the Ocular Perfusion Pressure. J Curr Glaucoma Pract 2016;10(1):4-6.

Ocular Perfusion Pressure and Pulsatile Ocular Blood Flow in Normal and Systemic Hypertensive Patients

Purpose: Glaucomatous neuropathy can be a consequence of insufficient blood supply, increase in intraocular pressure (IOP), or other risk factors that diminish the ocular blood flow. To determine the ocular perfusion pressure (OPP) in normal and systemic hypertensive patients.

Materials and methods: One hundred and twenty-one patients were enrolled in this prospective and comparative study and underwent a complete ophthalmologic examination including slit lamp examination, Goldmann applanation tonometry, stereoscopic fundus examination, and pulsatile ocular blood flow (POBF) measurements. The OPP was calculated as being the medium systemic arterial pressure (MAP) less the IOP. Only right eye values were considered for calculations using Student’s t-test.

Results: The mean age of the patients was 57.5 years (36-78), and 68.5% were women. There was a statistically significant difference in the OPP of the normal and systemic hypertensive patients (p < 0.05). The difference in the OPP between these groups varied between 8.84 and 17.9 mm Hg.

Conclusion: The results of this study suggest that although the systemic hypertensive patients have a higher OPP in comparison to normal patients, this increase does not mean that they also have a higher OBF (as measured by POBF tonograph). This may be caused by chronic changes in the vascular network and in the blood hemodynamics in patients with systemic hypertension.

How to cite this article: Kanadani FN, Figueiredo CR, Miranda RM, Cunha PLT, Kanadani TCM, Dorairaj S. Ocular Perfusion Pressure and Pulsatile Ocular Blood Flow in Normal and Systemic Hypertensive Patients. J Curr Glaucoma Pract 2015;9(1):16-19.

Technical note: How many readings are required for an acceptable accuracy in pulsatile ocular blood flow assessment?

PURPOSE

Pulsatile ocular blood flow (POBF) assessment aids the diagnosis of ocular diseases with defective ocular haemodynamics, such as glaucoma. Although each successful POBF measure given by the instrument represents five 'repeatable' pulses, there has been no study verifying how repeatable they are. There is also no report on the minimal number of measurements for an acceptable accuracy.

METHODS

Forty-three healthy young subjects were recruited and each subject had five consecutive POBF measurements obtained from one randomly selected eye. The coefficient of variation was calculated from the raw data of the five 'repeatable' pulses. The average from five consecutive measurements was considered as the standard for comparison with the first, average of the first two, the first three and the first four measurements. The 95% limits of agreement were determined using the Bland and Altman approach.

RESULTS

The coefficient of variation was greater than the manufacturer's claim of within 10%. The mean (+/-S.D.) POBF calculated from five consecutive measures was 732.5 +/- 243.2 microL min(-1). The mean (+/-S.D.) difference between the standard POBF and the first, average of the first two, the first three and the first four measurements was (in microL min(-1)): 12.5 +/- 59.8, 7.8 +/- 42.1, 9.6 +/- 32.5 and 3.7 +/- 19.6 respectively. The corresponding 95% limits of agreement were (in microL min(-1)): +/-117.2, +/-82.6, +/-63.8 and +/-38.4 respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

As the five 'repeatable' pulses were not as repeatable as the manufacturer claims, practitioners should not rely on one single POBF measure. An average of three consecutive measurements will be adequate to detect the minimum reported difference in POBF between glaucoma and normal patients.

Statistical strategies to assess reliability in ophthalmology

Reliability of measurements and measurers is important so that we can trust the measurements we record. However, the statistical techniques used to assess reliability of measurements or measurers in the ophthalmic literature are often inappropriate, and not able to evaluate reliability between measurements/measurers. We review the techniques used in reliability studies for both continuous and categorical data, and describe appropriate statistical methods for particular study designs. We also highlight current techniques that are not appropriate in the analysis of reliability, but that are still commonly used in the ophthalmic literature. We hope that by highlighting these, we shall discourage their future use.

Duplex sonography of retro-orbital and carotid arteries in patients with normal-tension glaucoma

PURPOSE

To evaluate retrobulbar and carotid arterial hemodynamics in patients with normal-tension glaucoma using Doppler sonography.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Duplex sonography was performed in 41 patients with normal-tension glaucoma and 30 control subjects to evaluate resistance indices (RIs) in retro-orbital and carotid arteries. Mean values were compared using the independent t-test. The ratios of the RI in retro-orbital to RIs in the carotid arteries (CCA and ICA) and interocular and intercarotid differences in RI (DeltaRI) were also calculated.

RESULTS

Is in the central retinal (CRA) and temporal and nasal posterior ciliary arteries (TPCA and NPCA) were statistically significantly greater in glaucomatous eyes (p < 0.001). Plaque formation in carotid arteries without significant stenosis was noted in 12% of patients and 10% of control subjects. Ratios of RI of CRA or TPCA or NPCA to that of CCA and the ratios of RI of CRA or NPCA to that of ophthalmic arteries (OA) were significantly greater in glaucomatous eyes. We also found that ratios of the RI of CRA or TPCA or NPCA to that of ICA and the ratio of the RI of OA to CCA were nearly equal to 1 in both patients and control subjects. We found no significant difference between interocular and intercarotid DeltaRIs in patients and control subjects.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with symmetric normal-tension glaucoma, duplex sonography showed an elevated RI in CRA and PCA. The Doppler evaluation of carotid arteries was useful.

Blood flow in glaucoma

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Glaucoma, one of the leading causes of blindness in the world, is characterized by progressive visual field loss and distinctive excavation of the optic nerve head. Although elevated intraocular pressure is the major risk factor, there is increasing evidence that the pathogenesis of glaucoma is also linked to altered ocular blood flow. This review summarizes the recent publications relevant to blood flow in glaucoma.

RECENT FINDINGS

Several studies indicate that a perfusion instability, rather than a steady reduction of ocular blood flow, might contribute to glaucomatous optic neuropathy. The main cause of the instability is a disturbed autoregulation in the context of a general vascular dysregulation. The underlying mechanism of such a vascular dysregulation is not known. A dysfunction of both the autonomic nervous system and vascular endothelial cells is discussed.

SUMMARY

The mechanical and vascular theories are not mutually exclusive; on the contrary, a vascular dysregulation increases the susceptibility to intraocular pressure. Therapeutically, therefore, both an intraocular pressure reduction and an improvement of the ocular blood flow might be considered.

Effect of breath-holding on pulsatile ocular blood flow measurement in normal subjects

BACKGROUND

The Valsalva maneuver is known to affect intraocular pressure (IOP). Simple breath-holding may cause IOP elevation. A recent study demonstrated a decrease in pulsatile ocular blood flow (POBF) during forcible exhalation. This study investigated whether breath-holding could affect POBF measurement.

METHODS

Thirty-eight healthy young adults were recruited. Their POBF's were measured with an ocular blood flow pneumatonometer. The first set of measurements was made using normal measurement protocol. Three consecutive readings were obtained, and the mean was used for analysis. The second set of measurements was taken after 5-min rest, and the subjects were required to hold their breath during the acquisition period.

RESULTS

As previously reported, POBF reduced with increasing myopia. There was no significant change in IOP, pulse rate, POBF, and pulse amplitude between normal protocol and breath-holding condition. POBF and pulse amplitude demonstrated a greater variation, shown by coefficient of variation, when subjects held their breath.

CONCLUSIONS

This study found a greater variation in consecutive POBF measurements during breath-holding condition. There was no significant difference in either POBF or pulse amplitude during breath-holding session, probably because of the use of three consecutive measurements, and averaged results were generated from them. It is advised to measure the POBF by taking consecutive readings, and subjects should not hold their breath.