Valid peer review for surgeons working in small hospitals

Innovative peer review model for rural physicians: system design and implementation

CONTEXT

The peer review process in small rural hospitals is complicated by limited numbers of physicians, conflict of interest, issues related to appropriate utilization of new technology, possibility for conflicting recommendations, and need for external expertise.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this project was to design, test, and implement a virtual peer review system for small rural hospitals in Texas. We sought to define the characteristics of a virtual peer review system in the context of rural health care, and to explore the benefits from peer review administration within a rural network supported by a university.

METHODS

Physicians from small rural hospitals participated in pilot testing of the system. Policies and procedures reflecting the innovative character of the new peer review process were developed based on legal/regulatory requirements and desired educational focus of the process. An information technology system to support the virtual peer review was selected, tested, and deployed.

FINDINGS

The system tests suggested feasibility of the procedures, reliability of the communication lines, and functional anonymity of the hospitals and physicians participating in the virtual peer review. Participating institutions and individual physicians expressed satisfaction with the reliability and user friendliness of the system as demonstrated during the pilot tests.

CONCLUSIONS

Hospital licensing and accreditation require a process to monitor and evaluate the care of patients. Utilizing means of virtual communication is a viable option for small rural hospitals. This process is dependable, user-friendly and provides functional anonymity to participating hospitals and physicians. The peer review system has successfully functioned since 2004.

Opportunities for improved performance in surgical specialty practice

OBJECTIVE

To identify opportunities for improvement in quality performance profile while maintaining better clinical outcomes.

METHODS

A prospective study of 5285 surgical specialty procedures including hip and knee replacement, cholecystectomy, hysterectomy, nonaccess vascular and cardiac procedures, and colorectal resections in 16 Kentucky hospitals was undertaken. The following observations were made after univariate and stepwise logistic regression analysis, from the Surgical Care Improvement Project.

RESULTS

(1) Impaired functional status, age > or =65, and ASA class 4 or 5 status were significant predictors for both morbidity and mortality. (2) beta blockade medication was maintained in only 70% of patients already receiving such medications; interestingly, vascular surgery and patients with known cardiac history did not have beta blockade initiated 52% of the time. (3) Appropriate blood glucose control was not achieved in 31% of patients with diabetes and in 20% of nondiabetics. (4) deep vein thrombosis (DVT) prophylaxis was independent of high-risk status, with wide variation in practice. Patients undergoing total hip or knee replacement or colorectal resections had highest rates (0.7%) of pulmonary emboli. (5) A poor choice of antibiotic prophylaxis agent occurred in 8% of patients and was associated with a 3-fold increase in mortality (P < 0.01). (6) Hypothermia on arrival in PACU was present in 7% of patients after major colorectal resections and was ominously associated with an over 4-fold increase in mortality (P < 0.01). (7) Preoperative WBC >11,000/mm in elective operations was associated with nearly 3-fold increase in mortality (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Now more than ever, surgeons must verify performance measures and outcomes. This study of clinical outcomes permits identification of underappreciated contemporary risk factors and some obvious measures by which surgical practices can more objectively be evaluated.

Peer assessment of resuscitation skills

INTRODUCTION

Peer tuition has been identified as a useful tool for delivering undergraduate healthcare training in basic life support. The aim of this study was to test the expansion of the peer tuition model to include peer assessment of performance. The study also sought to establish the attitudes towards peer assessment among the course students and tutors.

METHODS

Students undergoing an end-of-course test in basic life support were simultaneously assessed by peer and faculty assessors, and the reliability of assessment results was measured. Students' and peer assessors' attitudes to peer assessment were also measured, by questionnaire.

RESULTS

In all 162 candidates were assessed by 9 sets of peers and faculty examiners. Inter-observer agreement was high (>95%) for all assessment domains apart from chest compressions (93%). Agreement on the final pass/fail decision was less consistent at 86%, because of the lower pass rate of 71% (115/162) afforded by peer assessors compared with 82% (132/162) by faculty assessors (p=0.0008). Peer assessor sensitivity and specificity were 85% was 90%, respectively, with positive predictive value of 97% and negative predictive value of 57%.

CONCLUSION

Senior healthcare students can make reliable assessments of their peers' performance during an end-of-course test in basic life support. Students preferred peer assessment, and the peer assessment process was acceptable to the majority of students and peer assessors.

Differences and similarities between rural and urban operations

BACKGROUND

The importance of rural operations is magnified by super-specialization, uneven geographic distribution, and special educational needs. Definition of practice patterns and quality measures are needed.

METHODS

A statewide network of 60 operative specialists studied costs, quality, and outcomes in 17,319 patients undergoing 46 different specialty operations between 1998 and 2003, comparing 9,544 rural to 7,775 urban patients. These data are augmented by additional data from 5,339 operative patients in 2004.

RESULTS

Both high volume rural and urban surgeons achieved fewer deaths than less frequent practitioners of colon or rectal resections (2/309 vs 5/167). Urban surgeons had sicker patients undergoing more extensive procedures, and used fewer consultations, but had more complications and reoperations. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy had similar outcomes with 5 deaths among 1,788 patients. Urban surgeons converted to an open procedure more frequently, whereas rural surgeons used hepatobiliary iminodiacetic acid (HIDA) scans as indication for cholecystectomy more often (P < .01). Indications for upper and lower endoscopy varied, but abnormalities were noted in 64%; only 11 of 6,938 patients undergoing endoscopy were admitted for complications, 5 required operations, 3 due to totally obstructing cancers. Hysterectomy, urologic procedures, and tympanostomy had admission/readmission rates as low as 1/400. Documented patient preoperative education occurred in 94% of both groups. Overall, performance measures were addressed more consistently by rural surgeons (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Operative practice reaches high standards in both settings; indications for operations vary, and rural practice is broader than urban practice. Rural surgeons exceed their urban colleagues on some quality process measures.

The Practicing Surgeon as a Member of the Quality–Safety Team

The practicing surgeon is a valuable member of the quality–safety team and is often an underutilized data source for quality initiatives. The authors describe how their efforts in Kentucky, during a 10-year period, encouraged surgeons to become leaders in the quality initiative. Their experience began with the establishment of an organization of surgeons devoted to quality health care and cost control. As their efforts expanded and they gained experience, they were well prepared to transition to a regional and national quality initiative as part of a collaborative effort with the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services in the 2004 Surgical Care Improvement Project pilot. As a result of this ongoing experience, the authors we have been able to affect the quality of health care and have a positive influence on health care cost. They have demonstrated that surgeons will participate in and lead quality initiatives, and that these efforts foster an environment of cooperation between surgeons and hospitals.

An Eight-Year Analysis of Surgical Morbidity and Mortality: Data and Solutions

In this article, a reproducible process for presenting, analyzing, and reducing early and late surgical morbidity and mortality (M&M) is detailed. All M&M cases presented from 1998 through 2005 at Monmouth Medical Center were categorized. Residents and nurses were empowered to report the complications. The five major categories were overwhelming disease on admission, delays in treatment, diagnostic or judgment complications, treatment complications, and technical complications. From the 53,541 operations performed over 8 years, 714 patients were presented, which included 147 deaths and 1,132 category entries. The most common problems were technical complications in 474 (66.4%) patients. The data have generated actionable solutions, many with low barriers to adoption, resulting in safer, less expensive surgical management. Surgical outcome benchmarks have been established and are used for credentialing surgeons. The “Hostile Abdomen Index” has been developed to assess the safest choice for abdominal operative access, pre- and intraoperatively. We explained the real-time process that generated solutions for the entire department as well as changes relevant to residency training and individual operative techniques.

Renewal of surgical quality and safety initiatives: a multispecialty challenge

The quality and safety movement in surgical specialty practice is gaining momentum. On the basis of risk-adjusted outcomes of coronary artery surgery and the improved risk assessment in the Veterans Affairs system, a growing array of surgical specialists has focused on recognition of legitimate risk factors, identification of performance measures that are valid surrogates for better practices, and refinement of risk-adjusted outcomes. Recognition of educational needs, personal practice patterns, and systems deficiencies now permits a broad-based application of long-standing primarily medical issues to elective surgical procedures in an organized and Integrated fashion. Approximately 85,000 patients per day undergo elective operations in the United States. A platform based on physician involvement and leadership has been tested in the Surgical Care Improvement Project, funded by a subcontract from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. This effort has defined factors worthy of further verification and provides a framework for an ethical and valid pay-for-performance scheme.

Threats to rural surgery

BACKGROUND

Rural surgery is a subject that often is discussed but little has been done to address the problems of rural surgery. With a decreased interest in broad-based general surgery, an aging population (especially in rural America), an aging population of general surgeons who are retiring early, surgical care in rural North America is approaching a crisis.

METHODS

An internet search was performed to analyze the problems in rural surgery. Also, the experience of a 90-bed rural hospital in south central Kentucky was analyzed.

RESULTS

Approximately 17% to 25% of the population in America (55 million) live in a rural environment, depending on the way rural is defined. Rural general surgeons may become an endangered species because of multiple factors, including: lack of broad-based training, increased specialization, lifestyle issues, decreased interest in surgery, increased technology, aging rural surgeons, increased workload for the general surgeon, decreased reimbursement, increased expenses, increased expectations of the general public, and increased malpractice costs. Solutions include programs dedicated to training rural surgeons, networking with university tertiary care hospitals, equal pay for work performed regardless of the location, regionalization of rural surgery centers with multiple surgeons so the lifestyle issues can be addressed.

CONCLUSIONS

There is an increasing need for broad-based general surgeons in rural America. Training programs need to address the problem by offering dedicated training programs that should include primary training in general surgery and fellowships for special needs. A new specialty in rural general surgery needs to be created.

Practicing surgeons lead in quality care, safety, and cost control

OBJECTIVE

To report the experiences of 66 surgical specialists from 15 different hospitals who performed 43 CPT-based procedures more than 16,000 times.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Surgeons are under increasing pressure to demonstrate patient safety data as quantitated by objective and subjective outcomes that meet or exceed the standards of benchmark institutions or databases.

METHODS

Data from 66 surgical specialists on 43 CPT-based procedures were accessioned over a 4-year period. The hospitals vary from a small 30-bed hospital to large teaching hospitals. All reported deaths and complications were verified from hospital and office records and compared with benchmarks.

RESULTS

Over a 4-year inclusive period (1999-2002), 16,028 elective operations were accessioned. There was a total 1.4% complication rate and 0.05% death rate. A system has been developed for tracking outcomes. A wide range of improvements have been identified. These include the following: 1) improved classification of indications for systemic prophylactic antibiotic use and reduction in the variety of drugs used, 2) shortened length of stay for standard procedures in different surgical specialties, 3) adherence to strict indicators for selected operative procedures, 4) less use of costly diagnostic procedures, 5) decreased use of expensive home health services, 6) decreased use of very expensive drugs, 7) identification of the unnecessary expense of disposable laparoscopic devices, 8) development of a method to compare a one-surgeon hospital with his peers, and 9) development of unique protocols for interaction of anesthesia and surgery. The system also provides a very good basis for confirmation of patient safety and improvement therein.

CONCLUSIONS

Since 1998, Quality Surgical Solutions, PLLC, has developed simple physician-authored protocols for delivering high-quality and cost-effective surgery that measure up to benchmark institutions. We have discovered wide areas for improvements in surgery by adherence to simple protocols, minimizing death and complications and clarifying cost issues.