The role of cardiac morbidity in short- and long-term mortality in injured older patients who survive initial resuscitation

Predictive factors of intracranial bleeding in head trauma patients receiving antiplatelet therapy admitted to an emergency department

Background

In head trauma cases involving antiplatelet agent treatment, the French Society of Emergency Medicine recommends performing computed tomography (CT) scans to detect brain lesions, 90% of which are normal. The value of CT is still debatable given the scarce number of studies and controversial results.

Methods

We used the RATED registry (Registry of patient with Antithrombotic agents admitted to an Emergency Department, NCT02706080) to assess factors of cerebral bleeding related to antiplatelet agents following head trauma.

Results

From January 2014 to December 2015, 993 patients receiving antiplatelet agents were recruited, 293 (29.5%) of whom underwent CT scans for brain trauma. Intracranial bleeding was found in 26 (8.9%). Multivariate analysis revealed these patients more likely to have a history of severe hemorrhage (odds ratio [OR]: 8.47, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.56–45.82), dual antiplatelet therapy (OR: 6.46, 95%CI:1.46–28.44), headache or vomiting (OR: 4.27, 95%CI: 1.44–2.60), and abnormal Glasgow coma scale (OR: 8.60; 95%CI: 2.85–25.99) compared to those without intracranial bleeding. The predictive model derived from these variables achieved 98.9% specificity and a negative predictive value of 92%. The area under the ROC curve (AUROC) was 0.85 (95%CI: 0.77–0.93).

Conclusions

Our study demonstrated that the absence of history of severe hemorrhage, dual antiplatelet therapy, headache or vomiting, and abnormal Glasgow coma scale score appears to predict normal CT scan following traumatic brain injury in patients taking antiplatelets. This finding requires confirmation by prospective studies.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT02706080.

Evaluation and management of geriatric trauma: an Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma practice management guideline

BACKGROUND

Aging patients constitute an increasing proportion of patients treated at trauma centers. Previous and existing guidelines addressing care of the injured elder have not adequately addressed emerging data regarding optimal means for undertaking triage decisions, correcting coagulopathy, and the limitations of supraphysiologic resuscitation.

METHODS

More than 400 MEDLINE citations published between the years 2000 and 2008 were identified and screened. A total of 90 references were selected for the evidentiary table followed by consensus-based discussions regarding the level of evidence and the strength of recommendations that could be derived from the related findings of the individual studies.

RESULTS

In general, a lower threshold for trauma activation should be used for injured patients aged 65 years or older who are evaluated at trauma centers. Furthermore, elderly patients with at least one body system with an AIS score of 3 or higher or a base deficit of -6 or less should be treated at trauma centers, preferably in intensive care units staffed by surgeon-intensivists. In addition, all elderly patients who receive daily therapeutic anticoagulation should have appropriate assessment of their coagulation profile and cross-sectional imaging of the brain as soon as possible after admission where appropriate. In patients aged 65 years or older with a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score less than 8, if substantial improvement in GCS is not realized within 72 hours of injury, consideration should be given to limiting further aggressive therapeutic interventions.

CONCLUSION

Effective evidence-based care of aging patients necessitates aggressive triage, correction of coagulopathy, and limitation of care when clinical evidence points toward an overwhelming likelihood of poor long-term prognosis.

The effects of preinjury clopidogrel use on older trauma patients with head injuries

BACKGROUND

This study was designed to determine whether or not older trauma patients on clopidogrel have an increased risk of morbidity and mortality.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed on all trauma patients > or =50 years of age between January 1, 2002, and August 31, 2005. The charts of those patients who had documented preinjury use of clopidogrel were further reviewed. A control group of patients with no history of clopidogrel use was matched for age, sex, mechanism of injury, and injury severity score.

RESULTS

During this time period, there were 1,020 trauma patients > or =50 years of age admitted, 43 of which had documented preinjury clopidogrel use (P). A higher percentage of patients in the P group underwent cranial surgery, had episodes of rebleeds, and required transfusions of blood products than in the control group. The mortality and length of stay were comparable in both groups.

CONCLUSION

This study indicates that the preinjury use of clopidogrel may cause significant morbidity in patients with closed-head injuries. Further studies are needed to suggest specific treatment modalities.

Outcome From Serious Injury in Older Adults

PURPOSE

To analyze the research published in peer-reviewed journals between 1996 and 2005 about factors affecting the physical outcomes of older adults after serious traumatic injury.

ORGANIZING CONSTRUCT

Twenty-seven primary research studies published in the last 10 years pertained to in-hospital and long-term outcomes of serious injury among older adults. Research specific to isolated hip injury, traumatic brain injury, and burn trauma was excluded.

METHODS

An integrative review of research published between January 1996 and January 2005 was carried out to examine the relationship between older age and outcome from severe injury. MEDLINE, BIOSIS previews, CINAHL, and PsycINFO databases were searched using the MeSH terms: injury, serious injury, trauma and multiple trauma, and crossed with type, severity, medical/surgical management, complication, outcome, mortality, morbidity, survival, disability, quality of life, functional status, functional recovery, function, and placement.

FINDINGS

Older adults in these studies had higher short- and long-term mortality than did younger adults. The relationship between older age and poorer outcome persisted when adjusting for injury severity, number of injuries, comorbidities, and complications. At the same time, injury severity, number of injuries, complications, and gender each independently correlated with increased mortality among older adults. The body of research is limited by overreliance on retrospective data and heterogeneity in definitional criteria for the older adult population.

CONCLUSIONS

Additional research is needed to clarify the contributory effect of variables such as psychosocial sequelae and physiologic resilience on injury outcome. The field of geriatric trauma would benefit from further population-based prospective investigation of the determinants of injury outcome in older adults in order to guide interventions and acute care treatment.

Bench-to-bedside review: Resuscitation in the emergency department

Over the past decade the practice of acute resuscitation and its monitoring have undergone significant changes. Utilization of noninvasive mechanical ventilation, goal-directed therapy, restricted fluid volume, blood transfusion and minimally invasive technology for monitoring tissue oxygenation have changed the practice of acute resuscitation. Early diagnosis and definitive treatment of the underlying cause of shock remains the mainstay for survival after successful resuscitation. Patient-centered outcome end-points, in addition to survival, are being utilized to appraise the effectiveness of treatment. Application of medical ethics to the ever changing practice of acute resuscitation has also become a societal expectation.

Special considerations in geriatric injury

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

As the elderly population expands and adopts increasingly more active lifestyles, trauma and critical care practitioners will be faced with providing care for greater numbers of severely injured patients. However, because of their associated preexisting medical conditions and poor relative physiologic reserve, geriatric patients have higher mortality rates and poorer long-term functional outcomes than their younger counterparts. A thorough understanding of the causes for these disparate outcomes is critical if successful strategies and treatments for this unique patient population are to be developed.

RECENT FINDINGS

The currently available geriatric trauma literature is largely descriptive and retrospective, and does not provide ready explanations or solutions for the substantially worse outcomes experienced by this patient population. It does appear that outcomes are improved by providing early and aggressive care in designated trauma centers, yet undertriage remains a significant problem. Early admission to an ICU has been recommended, but its benefits remain unproved. Significant differences exist between older and younger patients in injury patterns, and in the frequency and type of complications These differences in turn demand prompt diagnostic approaches, aggressive treatment, and unique prevention strategies.

SUMMARY

Ironically, the field of geriatric trauma is still in its infancy. Given the relation between advanced age, associated preexisting medical conditions, and poor physiologic reserve, a poor outcome may be inevitable by the time the geriatric patient presents for medical attention. Greater emphasis should therefore be placed on injury prevention efforts in this patient population. There is a dire need for well-designed prospective studies in geriatric trauma.