Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for symptoms of biliary colic in the absence of gallstones

Gallbladder dysfunction: how much longer will it be controversial?

BACKGROUND

Motility disorders of the biliary tree [biliary dyskinesia, including both gallbladder dysfunction (GBD), and sphincter of Oddi dysfunction] are difficult to diagnose and to treat.

SUMMARY

There is controversy in the literature in particular regarding the criteria that should be used to select patients for cholecystectomy (CCY) in cases of suspected GBD. The current review covers the history, diagnosis, and treatment of GBD. Key Messages: Only >85% of patients with suspected GBD have relief following CCY, a much lower rate than the nearly 100% success rate following CCY for gallstone disease. Unfortunately, the literature is lacking, and there are no universally agreed-upon criteria for selecting which patients to refer for operation, although cholecystokinin (CCK)-enhanced hepatobiliary iminodiacetic acid scan is often used, with emphasis on an abnormally low gallbladder ejection fraction or pain reproduction at CCK administration. There is a clear need for large, well-designed, more definitive, prospective studies to better identify the indications for and efficacy of CCY in cases of GBD.

Cholecystectomy for biliary dyskinesia: how did we get there?

BACKGROUND

The focus of biliary dyskinesia (BD) shifted within the last 30 years, moving from symptoms after cholecystectomy (CCY) to symptoms with morphological normal gallbladder, but low gallbladder ejection fraction.

METHODS

We searched the pubmed database to systematically review studies focusing on the diagnosis and treatment of gallbladder dysfunction.

RESULTS

Impaired gallbladder contraction can be found in about 20% of healthy controls and an even higher number of patients with various other disorders. Surgery for BD increased after introduction of laparoscopic CCY, with BD now accounting for >20% of CCY in adults and up to 60% in pediatric patients. The majority of cases reported were operated in the USA, which differs from surgical series for cholelithiasis. Postoperative outcomes do not differ between groups with abnormal or normal gallbladder function.

CONCLUSION

Functional gallbladder testing should not be seen as an indicator of relevant biliary tract disease or prognostic marker to identify patients who may benefit from operative intervention. Instead biliary dyskinesia should be considered as a part of a spectrum of functional disorders, which are generally managed conservatively. Small proof of concept studies have demonstrated effects of medical therapy on biliary dysfunction and should thus be never tested in appropriately designed trials.

Natural history of acalculous biliary symptoms

INTRODUCTION

The radiological criteria for the diagnosis of gallbladder disease rely largely on the detection of calculi using ultrasonography. Patients may, however, suffer symptoms typical of biliary pain without detectable gallstones. The aim of this study was to identify a cohort of patients presenting with recurrent episodes of biliary symptoms in the absence of identifiable pathology on ultrasonography and to record the outcome of subsequent imaging investigations.

METHODS

Records of patients having abdominal ultrasonography during a four-month period in 2006 were accessed retrospectively and those with symptoms suggesting biliary disease were identified. Radiology records were reviewed over a five-year follow-up period to identify patients undergoing further imaging for recurrent biliary symptoms and outcomes were recorded.

RESULTS

A total of 512 patients had ultrasonography for investigation of symptoms consistent with biliary disease. Almost half (41.2%) of these were found to have gallbladder pathology on ultrasonography and 4.7% of patients went on to have further investigations for similar symptoms without achieving a diagnosis. The median age of this group was 47 years and 75% of these patients were female. During the follow-up period, 2.6% of patients with biliary symptoms and initially normal ultrasonography developed gallstones and in 1.3% pancreatitis was demonstrated on imaging.

CONCLUSIONS

A small minority of patients who present with biliary symptoms and have no abnormality on ultrasonography present with recurrent symptoms or develop significant biliary pathology. These patients should be identified by interview at routine follow-up visits and further investigations should be considered.

Diagnostic stringency and healthcare needs in patients with biliary dyskinesia

AIM

We have recently shown an increase in cholecystectomies for biliary dyskinesia. Based on these results, we hypothesized that diagnostic criteria are less stringently applied which may contribute to ongoing resource utilization.

METHODS

Using billing codes, patients seen for biliary dyskinesia were identified and data were extracted from the electronic medical record to confirm the diagnosis, obtain demographic and clinical data and assess resource utilization 1 year prior to and after cholecystectomy.

RESULTS

A total of 972 patients were identified, with 894 undergoing cholecystectomy. In 259 patients, symptoms had started <3 months prior to evaluation. Functional gallbladder imaging revealed a mean gallbladder ejection fraction of 23.1 ± 0.7 %; of the patients undergoing surgery, 116 had a normal gallbladder ejection fraction. Sufficient up data for pre- and post-operative assessment of resource utilization was available for 368 patients. Emergency room (ER) visits decreased from 0.86 ± 0.07 to 0.69 ± 0.03 (P < 0.05), while hospitalization rates remained unchanged after surgery. Patients not meeting consensus criteria for the diagnosis of biliary dyskinesia were more likely to use opioids and have ER visits prior to and after cholecystectomy. Using multiple logistic regression benzodiazepine use, migraine history and prior ER visits independently predicted postoperative resource utilization.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data demonstrate that a significant number of patients undergo cholecystectomy for biliary dyskinesia, even though they do not meet currently accepted diagnostic criteria. While healthcare resource utilization drops within the first year after surgery, ER visits and hospitalizations remain common, suggesting a more limited benefit of surgical approaches in these patients.

The rising tide of cholecystectomy for biliary dyskinesia

BACKGROUND

Expert consensus defines biliary dyskinesia as a rare disorder of the gall-bladder characterised by pain and impaired gall-bladder function.

AIM

To determine trends in cholecystectomy rates for biliary dyskinesia in the United States.

METHODS

As biliary dyskinesia does not have a distinct diagnosis code, the narrative diagnoses for patients were reviewed and abstracted for 200 patients treated for the most commonly used diagnosis codes for biliary dyskinesia (validation sample). Time trends in cholecystectomies and hospitalisations for biliary diseases were assessed using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality) based on codes for cholecystectomy and diagnosis codes for different biliary disorders.

RESULTS

In the validation sample, biliary dyskinesia accounted for 81% of the patients with ICD-9 code 575.8 (gall-bladder disease not elsewhere specified). Between 1997 and 2010, admissions for acute cholecystitis and complications of gallstone disease decreased slightly, whereas admissions with the primary diagnosis code ICD-9 575.8 tripled. This rise was most pronounced in the paediatric population (700% increase), with biliary dyskinesia accounting for more than 10% of cholecystectomies. Compared with acute biliary diseases, significantly more of the elective hospitalisations were covered by private insurances.

CONCLUSIONS

Practice patterns differ from expert opinion, with biliary dyskinesia accounting for an increasing fraction of cholecystectomies. The rise in these elective interventions is associated with a shift to a younger, low risk and predominantly privately insured population. Considering the benign nature of biliary dyskinesia, it is time to reassess the need for operative interventions, which have never been compared with active conservative therapy.

Endoscopically obtained bile aspirate is an accurate adjunct in the diagnosis of symptomatic gallbladder disease

Endoscopically obtained bile aspirate was found to be an effective technique to identify patients with symptomatic gallbladder disease and negative diagnostic studies.

Objectives:

The experience of a single surgeon in a rural hospital over a 10-year period was analyzed with respect to the utilization of endoscopically obtained bile aspirates as an adjunct in the diagnosis of symptomatic gallbladder disease.

Methods:

A retrospective study of the author's entire cholecystectomy experience over a 10-year period with 641 patients was conducted to evaluate the utility of the bile aspirate in the preoperative selection of operative candidates and with respect to the ultimate pathologic diagnostic accuracy of the test.

Results:

Derivation of preoperative diagnosis via traditional standard means was possible in 479 patients. An endoscopically obtained positive bile aspirate was found in 162 additional patients who failed to have positive traditional diagnostic studies (acalculous gallbladder disease). Micro-pathology was determined to be present in 603 patients (94.07%). In 27 of the 38 negatives, there had been positive radiological studies (71%). In 11 of the 38, a positive preoperative bile aspirate had been obtained (28.9%). Of the 162 patients with a positive bile aspirate, 151 (93.21%) of the gallbladder specimens had confirmatory histologic analysis (92.1% confidence interval ± 3.95%).

Conclusion:

In patients with symptoms suggestive of clinical gallbladder disease and negative traditional diagnostic studies, the endoscopically obtained bile aspirate has been shown to be a highly reliable tool in establishing the diagnosis and is recommended as an aid in the appropriate selection of candidates who may benefit from cholecystectomy.

Efficacy of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the pediatric population

PURPOSE

Gallbladder disease is increasingly affecting the pediatric population. The advent of new technology in the 1980s, specifically, hepatobiliary scintigraphy and laparoscopic cholecystectomy, gave a dramatic rise in both the diagnosis and treatment of biliary disease in the pediatric population. The purpose of this study was to determine (a) whether laparoscopic cholecystectomy for biliary dyskinesia is efficacious in the treatment of children with biliary colic and (b) the ability of cholescintigraphy to predict which patients may benefit from an operative intervention.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of the records of all patients (N = 184) who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy, correlating postoperative results with degree of dyskinesia (percentage of ejection fraction), histopathology, associated gastrointestinal diagnoses, age, and sex. Biliary dyskinesia was defined by ultrasonography without evidence of cholelithiasis with clinical diagnosis of biliary colic.

RESULTS

Of the 184 patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy, 117 had a diagnosis of biliary dyskinesia and 108 were available for follow-up. Mean follow-up was 8.3 months. One hundred patients (92.6%) reported resolution or improvement of preoperative symptoms (64.8% reported complete resolution and 27.8% reported improvement in symptoms). The mean age of the patients was 14.1 years. No correlation was seen for degree of dyskinesia, histopathology, age, and sex. Patients with a preoperative diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux were more likely to report resolution of symptoms, although this finding was not statistically significant. There was no major complication; 1 patient suffered a prolonged ileus, 1 patient suffered a wound infection, and 1 patient required incisional hernia repair.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is safe, efficacious, and durable in children suffering from biliary dyskinesia.

Gastroduodenoscopy: a routine examination of 2,800 patients before laparoscopic cholecystectomy

BACKGROUND

Unrecognized gastric and duodenal peptic ulcer is a common cause of epigastric pains for patients with cholelithiasis qualified for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Undiagnosed gastric or duodenal ulcer may be the cause of persistent pains after cholecystectomy. The purpose of the study was to assess the value of a routine preoperative panendoscopy for qualifying patients to undergo laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

METHODS

The study enrolled 2,800 patients treated for cholelithiasis from May 1993 to December 2002. Endoscopic examination was performed for all treated patients 1 to 4 days before their operations.

RESULTS

Preoperative endoscopy showed pathologic changes in the stomach or duodenum in 1,187 (42%) of 2,800 patients qualified for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Gastric ulcer was found in 179 patients (6.4%) duodenal ulcer in 127 patients (4.5%), gastritis in 735 patients (26.3%), polyps in 143 patients (5.1%), and cancer in 3 patients (0.1%). The surgery was postponed for patients with ulcer, and antiulcer treatment was started. In 16 patients, the symptoms associated with cholelithiasis subsided after healing of the ulcer. Cholelithiasis in these patients was asymptomatic, and a cholecystectomy was not performed.

CONCLUSIONS

Panendoscopy should be a routine examination performed for each patient qualified to undergo laparoscopic cholecystectomy. For some patients with asymptomatic cholelithiasis, pain in fact is caused by peptic ulcer.