Axillary lymph node metastases in patients with a final diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ

Toward Exempting from Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in T1 Breast Cancer Patients: A Retrospective Study

Background and Objective

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is used to assess the status of axillary lymph node (ALN), but it causes many adverse reactions. Considering the low rate of sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastasis in T1 breast cancer, this study aims to identify the characteristics of T1 breast cancer without SLN metastasis and to select T1 breast cancer patients who avoid SLNB through constructing a nomogram.

Methods

A total of 1,619 T1 breast cancer patients with SLNB in our hospital were enrolled in this study. Through univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis, we analyzed the tumor anatomical and clinicopathological factors and constructed the Heilongjiang Medical University (HMU) nomogram. We selected the patients exempt from SLNB by using the nomogram.

Results

In the training cohort of 1,000 cases, the SLN metastasis rate was 23.8%. Tumor volume, swollen axillary lymph nodes, pathological types, and molecular subtypes were found to be independent predictors for SLN metastasis in multivariate regression analysis. Distance from nipple or surface and position of tumor have no effect on SLN metastasis. A regression model based on the results of the multivariate analysis was developed to predict the risk of SLN metastasis, indicating an AUC of 0.798. It showed excellent diagnostic performance (AUC = 0.773) in the validation cohort.

Conclusion

The HMU nomogram for predicting SLN metastasis incorporates four variables, including tumor volume, swollen axillary lymph nodes, pathological types, and molecular subtypes. The SLN metastasis rates of intraductal carcinoma and HER2 enriched are 2.05% and 6.67%. These patients could be included in trials investigating the SLNB exemption.

OUP accepted manuscript

Background

Axillary lymph node status remains the most powerful prognostic indicator in invasive breast cancer. Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is a non-invasive disease and does not spread to axillary lymph nodes. The presence of an invasive component to DCIS mandates nodal evaluation through sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB). Quantification of the necessity of upfront SLNB for DCIS requires investigation. The aim was to establish the likelihood of having a positive SLNB (SLNB+) for DCIS and to establish parameters predictive of SLNB+.

Methods

A systematic review was performed as per the PRISMA guidelines. Prospective studies only were included. Characteristics predictive of SLNB+ were expressed as dichotomous variables and pooled as odds ratios (o.r.) and associated 95 per cent confidence intervals (c.i.) using the Mantel–Haenszel method.

Results

Overall, 16 studies including 4388 patients were included (mean patient age 54.8 (range 24 to 92) years). Of these, 72.5 per cent of patients underwent SLNB (3156 of 4356 patients) and 4.9 per cent had SLNB+ (153 of 3153 patients). The likelihood of having SLNB+ for DCIS was less than 1 per cent (o.r. <0.01, 95 per cent c.i. 0.00 to 0.01; P < 0.001, I² = 93 per cent). Palpable DCIS (o.r. 2.01, 95 per cent c.i. 0.64 to 6.24; P = 0.230, I² = 0 per cent), tumour necrosis (o.r. 3.84, 95 per cent c.i. 0.85 to 17.44; P = 0.080, I² = 83 per cent), and grade 3 DCIS (o.r. 1.34, 95 per cent c.i. 0.80 to 2.23; P = 0.270, I² = 0 per cent) all trended towards significance in predicting SLNB+.

Conclusion

While aggressive clinicopathological parameters may guide SLNB for patients with DCIS, the absolute and relative risk of SLNB+ for DCIS is less than 5 per cent and 1 per cent, respectively. Well-designed randomized controlled trials are required to establish fully the necessity of SLNB for patients diagnosed with DCIS.

Registration number

CRD42021284194 (https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/)

When Is Sentinel Node Biopsy Indicated in High-Risk Ductal Carcinoma in situ? Four Hundred Sixty-Eight Cases from Three Institutions

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is not indicated. However, in certain cases (size &#x3e;3 cm, high grade, mass effect on mammography, or palpable mass), it may be possible to find incidental invasive carcinoma (IC) that requires an SLNB. We studied the correlation of the aforesaid factors with the probability of finding IC in the surgical specimen. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Data was collected from 3 different institutions between 2010 and 2016, recording characteristics such as, but not limited to: high grade, size &#x3e;3 cm, mass effect on mammography, and palpable mass. <b><i>Results:</i></b> On the whole, 468 “high-risk” DCIS cases were identified, 139 (29%) of which had IC. When the DCIS was high grade or the size was &#x3e;3 cm, there was no significant difference in the probability of finding IC in the surgical specimen (OR = 1.13; 95% CI 0.84–1.51; OR = 1.2; 95% CI 0.85–1.40). Nevertheless, when a high grade and size (&#x3e;3 cm) were combined, IC was more likely to exist (72.7 vs. 27.3%; <i>p</i> = 0.001). In addition, mass effect and palpation were independently associated with a significantly greater degree of IC (OR = 12.76; 95% CI 6.93–23.52). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> The results suggest that high-grade DCIS or DCIS with a size &#x3e;3 cm, independently, does not require SLNB. Nonetheless, in the event that both factors are found in the same case, SLNB may be indicated. Additionally, SLNB is advisable for DCIS cases that are palpable or show a mass effect on mammography.

Current Approaches to Diagnosis and Treatment of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ and Future Directions

The presentation and treatment of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) has changed substantially over the years. While previously an incidental pathologic finding in more advanced, palpable tumors, the institution of screening mammography has repositioned this disease entity as one largely diagnosed as a non-palpable lesion, often prior to any invasive disease. As DCIS is a precursor to invasive carcinoma, evolution in the approach to treatment has followed in the footsteps of that for invasive disease, including breast conservation therapy, adjuvant radiation, and use of antihormonal therapy. Survival outcomes for DCIS are very high and more recent literature has investigated tailoring therapeutic approaches to avoid overtreatment. Two important areas of ongoing clinical debate concerning overtreatment include use of preoperative MRI and the role of adjuvant radiation. The heterogeneity of the disease makes it difficult to differentiate lesions that would benefit from more aggressive treatment from those in which overtreatment could be avoided. Clinical characteristics, such as histologic appearance, age at diagnosis, and margin status at tumor excision have been established as moderate predictors of disease recurrence, but none has provided strong enough evidence as to guide consensus decisions on adjuvant therapy. Continuing research seeks to define the genetic and molecular characteristics that can predict disease course and serve as the potential targets for novel therapeutic agents. While several markers have shown promise in differentiating tumor aggressiveness, there is still much to be discovered about the precise mechanisms of disease progression and how this can be applied clinically to optimize treatment.

Is sentinel lymph node biopsy indicated in patients with a diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ? A systematic literature review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Recent discussion has suggested that some cases of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) with high risk of invasive disease may require sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB).

METHODS

Systematic literature review identified 48 studies (9,803 DCIS patients who underwent SLNB). Separate analyses for patients diagnosed preoperatively by core sampling and patients diagnosed postoperatively by specimen pathology were conducted to determine the percentage of patients with axillary nodal involvement. Patient factors were analyzed for associations with risk of nodal involvement.

RESULTS

The mean percentage of positive SLNBs was higher in the preoperative group (5.95% vs 3.02%; P = .0201). Meta-regression analysis showed a direct association with tumor size (P = .0333) and grade (P = .00839) but not median age nor tumor upstage rate.

CONCLUSIONS

The SLNB should be routinely considered in patients with large (>2 cm) high-grade DCIS after a careful multidisciplinary discussion. In the context of breast conserving surgery, the SLNB is not routinely indicated for low- and intermediate-grade DCIS, high-grade DCIS smaller than 2 cm, or pure DCIS diagnosed by definitive surgical excision.

Minimal residual disease in breast cancer: an overview of circulating and disseminated tumour cells

Within the field of cancer research, focus on the study of minimal residual disease (MRD) in the context of carcinoma has grown exponentially over the past several years. MRD encompasses circulating tumour cells (CTCs)—cancer cells on the move via the circulatory or lymphatic system, disseminated tumour cells (DTCs)—cancer cells which have escaped into a distant site (most studies have focused on bone marrow), and resistant cancer cells surviving therapy—be they local or distant, all of which may ultimately give rise to local relapse or overt metastasis. Initial studies simply recorded the presence and number of CTCs and DTCs; however recent advances are allowing assessment of the relationship between their persistence, patient prognosis and the biological properties of MRD, leading to a better understanding of the metastatic process. Technological developments for the isolation and analysis of circulating and disseminated tumour cells continue to emerge, creating new opportunities to monitor disease progression and perhaps alter disease outcome. This review outlines our knowledge to date on both measurement and categorisation of MRD in the form of CTCs and DTCs with respect to how this relates to cancer outcomes, and the hurdles and future of research into both CTCs and DTCs.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy can be omitted in DCIS patients treated with breast conserving therapy

Breast cancer guidelines advise sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) on core biopsy at high risk of invasive cancer or in case of mastectomy. This study investigates the incidence of SLNB and SLN metastases and the relevance of indications in guidelines and literature to perform SLNB in order to validate whether SLNB is justified in patients with DCIS on core biopsy in current era. Clinically node negative patients diagnosed from 2004 to 2013 with only DCIS on core needle biopsy were selected from a national database. Incidence of SLN biopsy and metastases was calculated. With Fisher exact tests correlation between SLNB indications and actual presence of SLN metastases was studied. Further, underestimation rate for invasive cancer and correlation with SLN metastases was analysed. 910 patients were included. SLNB was performed in 471 patients (51.8 %): 94.5 % had pN0, 3.0 % pN1mi and 2.5 % pN1. Patients undergoing mastectomy had 7 % SLN metastases versus 3.5 % for breast conserving surgery (BCS) (p = 0.107). The only factors correlating to SLN metastases were smaller core needle size (p = 0.01) and invasive cancer (p < 0.001). Invasive cancer was detected in 16.7 % by histopathology with 15.6 % SLN metastases versus only 2 % in pure DCIS. SLNB showed metastases in 5.5 % of patients; 3.5 % in case of BCS (any histopathology) and 2 % when pure DCIS was found at definitive histopathology (BCS and mastectomy). Consequently, SLNB should no longer be performed in patients diagnosed with DCIS on core biopsy undergoing BCS. If definitive histopathology shows invasive cancer, SLNB can still be considered after initial surgery.

Is Sentinel Lymph Node Dissection Warranted for Patients with a Diagnosis of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ?

BACKGROUND

Positive sentinel lymph node (SLN) findings in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) range from 1 to 22 % but have unknown biologic significance. This study sought to identify predictors of positive SLNs and to assess their clinical significance for patients with an initial diagnosis of DCIS.

METHODS

The study identified 1234 patients with an initial diagnosis of DCIS who underwent SLN dissection (SLND) at our institution from 1997 through 2011. Positive SLN findings were categorized as isolated tumor cells (ITCs) (≤0.2 mm), micrometastases (>0.2-2 mm), or macrometastases (>2 mm). Predictors of positive SLNs were analyzed, and survival outcomes were examined.

RESULTS

Positive SLN findings were identified in 132 patients (10.7 %): 66 patients with ITCs (5.4 %), 36 patients with micrometastases (2.9 %), and 30 patients with macrometastases (2.4 %). Upstaging to microinvasive (n = 68, 5.5 %) or invasive (n = 259, 21.0 %) cancer occurred for 327 patients (26.5 %). Factors predicting positive SLNs included diagnosis by excisional biopsy (odds ratio [OR] 1.90; P = 0.007), papillary histology (OR 1.77; P = 0.006), DCIS larger than 2 cm (OR 1.55; P = 0.030), more than three interventions before SLND (4 interventions: OR 2.04; P = 0.022; ≥5 interventions: OR 3.87; P < 0.001), and occult invasion (microinvasive: OR 3.44; P = 0.001; invasive: OR 6.21; P < 0.001). The median follow-up period was 61.7 months. Patients who had pure DCIS with and without positive SLNs had equivalent survival rates (100.0 vs 99.7 %; P = 0.679). Patients with occult invasion and positive SLNs had the worst survival rate (91.7 %; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Occult invasion and more than three total interventions were the strongest predictors of positive SLN findings in patients with an initial diagnosis of DCIS. This supports the theory of benign mechanical transport of breast epithelial cells. Except for patients at high risk for invasive disease, routine use of SLND in DCIS is not warranted.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with breast ductal carcinoma in situ: Chinese experiences

The axillary treatment of patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) remains controversial. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the roles of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in patients with breast DCIS. A database containing the data from 262 patients diagnosed with breast DCIS and 100 patients diagnosed with DCIS with microinvasion (DCISM) who received SLNB between January 2002 and July 2014 was retrospectively analyzed. Of the 262 patients with DCIS, 9 presented with SLN metastases (3 macrometastases and 6 micrometastases). Patients with large tumors diagnosed by ultrasound or with tumors of high histological grade had a higher positive rate of SLNs than those without (P=0.037 and P<0.0001, respectively). Of the 100 patients with DCISM, 11 presented with metastases. Younger patients had a higher positive rate of SLNs (P=0.028). According to the results of this study and the systematic review of recent studies, the indications of SLNB for patients with DCIS are as follows: SLNB should be performed in all DCISM patients and in those DCIS patients who received mastectomy, and could be avoided in those who received breast-conserving surgery. However, SLNB should be recommended to patients who have high risks of harboring invasive components. The risk factors include a large, palpable tumor, a mammographic mass or a high histological grade.

Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Should Be Included with the Initial Surgery for High-Risk Ductal Carcinoma-In-Situ

Background. A proportion of those diagnosed preoperatively with ductal carcinoma-in-situ (DCIS) will be histologically upgraded to invasive carcinoma. Repeat surgery for sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy will be required if it had not been included with the initial surgery. We reviewed the outcome of SLN biopsy performed with the initial surgery based on a preoperative diagnosis of DCIS and aimed to identify patients at risk of histological upgrade. Methods. Retrospective review of 294 consecutive female patients diagnosed with DCIS was performed at our institute from January 1, 2001, to December 31, 2008. Results. Of the 294 patients, 132 (44.9%) underwent SLN biopsy together with the initial surgery. The SLN was positive for metastases in 5 patients, all of whom had tumours that were histologically upgraded. Histological upgrade also occurred in 43 of the 127 patients (33.9%) in whom the SLN was negative for metastases. On multivariate analysis, histological upgrade was more likely if a mass was detected on mammogram, if the preoperative diagnosis was obtained with core biopsy and if microinvasion was reported in the biopsy. Conclusion. Patients in whom a preoperative diagnosis of DCIS is likely to be upgraded to invasive carcinoma will benefit from SLN biopsy being performed with the initial surgery.

A differential intra-operative molecular biological test for the detection of sentinel lymph node metastases in breast carcinoma. An extended experience from the first U.K. centre routinely offering the service in clinical practice

INTRODUCTION

One-Step Nucleic acid Amplification (OSNA) is a molecular biological assay of cytokeratin-19 (a breast epithelial marker) mRNA. It can be employed intra-operatively for detection of lymph node metastases in breast carcinoma. Patients with positive sentinel nodes may proceed to axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) level I or higher dependent upon the OSNA quantitative result, during the same surgical procedure, avoiding a second operation and eliminating the technical difficulties possibly associated with delayed ALND.

AIMS

Our Breast Unit was the first in the UK to implement this novel technique in routine practice. This study reviews our first 44-month data following introduction of OSNA "live" on whole sentinel nodes following an extensive validation study (Snook et al.).(9) METHODS: Data was collected prospectively from the period of introduction 01/12/2008 to 30/08/2012. All patients eligible for sentinel node biopsy were offered OSNA and operations were performed by five consultant breast surgeons. On detection of macro-metastasis a level II/III and for a micro-metastasis a level I ALND was performed.

RESULTS

A total of 859 patients (1709 sentinel lymph nodes) were analysed. All except one were females. The majority underwent wide local excision (73.4%, n = 631) or mastectomy 25% (n = 215) and 1.6% (13) underwent SLN biopsy alone. IDC was seen in 79% (n = 680) of the patients and 53.5% (n = 460) had grade II tumours. One-third (30.8%, n = 265) had positive sentinel nodes and had further axillary surgery at the time of SLN biopsy. Of these, 47% (n = 125/265) had macro-metastases, 38% (n = 101/265) had micro-metastases and 14.7% (n = 39/265) had "positive but inhibited" results. Positive non-sentinel lymph nodes (NSLN) were seen in 35% (44/125) of those with macro-metastases; 17.8% (18/101) of the patients with micro-metastases and 10.2% (4/39) of the "positive but inhibited" group.

CONCLUSION

In our series over a third of our patients had positive lymph nodes detected with OSNA allowing them to proceed directly to axillary surgery at the same operation. This technique eliminates the need for a second operation in sentinel lymph node positive patients and avoids the anxiety waiting for histological results.

Utility of intraoperative frozen section examination of sentinel lymph nodes in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast

BACKGROUND

Intraoperative frozen section (IFS) examination of sentinel lymph nodes (SLN) is useful in selecting patients with invasive breast cancer for immediate axillary lymph node dissection. However, whether IFS evaluation of the SLNs in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast has any value has not been previously assessed.

METHODS

Clinicopathologic data from patients with DCIS who underwent resection with SLN biopsy (2004-2010) were collected to assess the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of IFS, and its impact on axillary management.

RESULTS

A total of 267 patients with DCIS underwent resection with SLN biopsy and IFS evaluation. Preoperative pathology was DCIS (n = 231), DCIS with microinvasion (n = 24), and DCIS with other lesions (n = 12). Fifty-two (19.5%) patients had invasive breast cancer on final pathology. SLN metastases were identified in 13 (4.8%) patients; however, only 4 (1.5%) were IFS positive. IFS examination was negative in 263 (98.5%) patients. Among patients with SLN metastases, the most common pattern of metastases was either micrometastasis (n = 6) or immunohistochemistry-positive individual tumor cells (n = 4), whereas 3 patients had a macrometastasis. IFS examination was falsely negative in 9 of these 13 patients for a false-negative rate of 69.3%, and a sensitivity and specificity of 31% and 100% respectively. Nine of the 13 patients underwent axillary lymph node dissection and only 1 patient had further axillary metastasis.

CONCLUSIONS

SLN metastases in DCIS is rare and most commonly involves SLN micrometastasis or immunohistochemistry-positive individual tumor cells. SLN IFS evaluation in DCIS has a low yield and sensitivity, and can be safely omitted to reduce operative duration and cost.

Treatment outcomes and unfavorable prognostic factors in patients with occult breast cancer

AIMS

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the treatment outcomes and prognostic factors in patients with occult breast cancer (OBC).

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 95 patients with OBC who were treated at our facility between January 1998 and June 2010. Of the 95 patients, 64 underwent mastectomy plus axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) with or without post-mastectomy radiation (Mast + ALND group), 13 underwent ALND followed by ipsilateral breast radiotherapy (BR + ALND group) and the remaining 18 were treated with ALND (ALND group).

RESULTS

Patients who underwent Mast + ALND or BR + ALND had significantly improved rates of locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRFS) and recurrence/metastasis-free survival (RFS) than patients who only underwent ALND (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences in the LRFS (p = 0.718), RFS (p = 0.935) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) (p = 0.991) rates between the patients who underwent Mast + ALND compared with those who received BR + ALND. Multivariate analysis revealed that patients with four or more involved lymph nodes had significantly worse outcomes (p = 0.042, HR = 4.63, 95% CI = 1.66-32.47 for BCSS and p = 0.038, HR = 3.62, 95% CI = 1.08-20.77 for RFS).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with OBC who received ALND and subsequent breast radiotherapy had similar outcomes to patients who underwent mastectomy. The presence of four or more involved lymph nodes may independently predict poor outcomes of OBC.

Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Pure DCIS: Is It Necessary?

Introduction. Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in patients with pure ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) has been a matter of debate due to very low rate of axillary metastases. We therefore aimed to identify factors in a single institutional series to select patients who may benefit from SLNB. Material and Methods. Patients, diagnosed with pure DCIS (n = 63) between July 2000 and March 2011, were reviewed. All the sentinel lymph nodes were examined by serial sectioning (50 μm) of the entire lymph node and H&E staining, and by cytokeratin immunostaining in suspicious cases. Results. Median age was 51 (range, 30-79). Of 63 patients, 40 cases (63.5%) with pure DCIS underwent SLN, and 2 of them had a positive SLN (5%). In both 2 cases with SLN metastases, only one sentinel lymph node was involved with tumor cells. Patients who underwent SLNB were more likely to have a tumor size >30 mm or DCIS with intermediate and high nuclear grade or a mastectomy in univariate and multivariate analyses. Conclusion. In our series, we found a slightly higher rate of SLNB positivity in patients with pure DCIS than the large series reported elsewhere. This may either be due to the meticulous examination of SLNs by serial sectioning technique or due to our patient selection criteria or both.

Ductal carcinoma in situ and sentinel lymph node biopsy

PURPOSE

Axillary lymph node status is the strongest prognostic indicator of survival for women with breast cancer. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is required in patients with an initial diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS).

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed of 78 patients with an initial diagnosis of DCIS between December 2002 and April 2010 and who proceeded to have either SLNB or axillary node dissection performed as part of their primary surgical procedure. The study focused on the rates of axillary node metastasis and the underestimation of invasive carcinoma at an initial diagnosis.

RESULTS

Forty-eight patients underwent SLNB and 18 patients underwent axillary node dissection. Only 1 of 66 patients (1.5%) had a positive sentinel lymph node. After definite surgery, the final diagnosis was changed to invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) in 12 patients and DCIS with microinvasion in 2 patients; 14 of 78 patients (17.9%) were therefore underestimated at preoperative histological examinations. In 35 patients who were diagnosed DCIS by core needle biopsy (CNB), 13 patients (37.1%) were upstaged into IDC or DCIS with microinvasion in the final diagnosis. The statistically significant factors predictive of invasive breast cancer were a large tumor size and HER2 overexpression.

CONCLUSION

The rates of SLNB positivity in pure DCIS are very low, and there is continuing uncertainty about its clinical importance. However in view of the high rate of underestimation of invasive carcinoma in patients with an initial diagnosis of DCIS, SLNB appears to be appropriate in these patients, especially in the case when DCIS is diagnosed by a core needle biopsy. In patients with an initial diagnosis of DCIS by CNB, SLNB should be considered as part of the primary surgical procedure, when preoperative variables show a tumor larger than 2.35 cm and with HER2 overexpression.

Metastatic invasive breast cancer recurrence following curative-intent therapy for ductal carcinoma in situ

BACKGROUND

The development of an invasive breast cancer recurrence outside of the breast parenchyma following curative-intent therapy for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is rare. We describe the patient and tumor characteristics associated with such recurrences.

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted of 621 patients who were treated for DCIS between 2004 and 2009. Patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics were collected. Descriptive statistics were utilized for data summary and data were compared using χ(2), where appropriate.

RESULTS

Of 621 patients who underwent curative-intent therapy for DCIS, 12 (1.9%) developed an invasive metastatic recurrence. Primary local therapy at the time of the initial DCIS diagnosis included 11 patients who underwent mastectomy and one who had lumpectomy and adjuvant radiotherapy. The metastatic recurrences were in chest wall and/or ipsilateral axillary lymph nodes only (n = 6) or distant sites with or without ipsilateral axillary or supraclavicular lymph nodes (n = 6). Of the 12 patients with invasive recurrence, eight had high grade DCIS with comedo necrosis at initial diagnosis. The biomarker profiles of the invasive recurrences included 55% estrogen receptor positivity, 45% progesterone receptor positivity, and 73% Her2/neu amplification. Patient age, tumor grade, presence of comedo necrosis, biomarker profile, and surgical treatment were not predictive of recurrence.

CONCLUSION

Invasive metastatic recurrence following adequate local therapy for DCIS is uncommon and likely represents progression of unidentified invasive disease at the time of diagnosis. The majority of invasive recurrences were Her2/neu amplified. Further studies are necessary to determine if such a unique biomarker profile correlates with metastatic recurrence.

The impact of sentinel lymph node biopsy and magnetic resonance imaging on important outcomes among patients with ductal carcinoma in situ

The objective of this systematic review was to determine the impact of sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy and breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) on important outcomes for patients with ductal carcinoma in situ. We identified no study that directly evaluated important outcomes for SLN biopsy. So, we determined the incidence of SLN metastases among patients with ductal carcinoma in situ. Using American Joint Committee on Cancer criteria, the incidence of pN1 and pN1(mic) SLN metastases were 0.9% and 1.5%, respectively. Because the incidence of SLN metastasis is very low, SLN biopsy is not likely to affect important outcomes. We identified one study that directly evaluated important outcomes after breast MRI. In this study, the use of MRI did not affect local recurrence rates after breast-conserving surgery and radiation. Although MRI may identify occult multicentric or contralateral breast cancer in some patients, it may also lead to unnecessary biopsies and overtreatment.

[Benefit of sentinel node biopsy in patients with breast ductal carcinoma in situ]

INTRODUCTION

Patients with a diagnosis of breast ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) have a low risk of developing axillary metastases. The use of sentinel node biopsy in this group of patients is controversial. The objective of this study is to determine if the sentinel node biopsy benefits a subgroup of patients with DCIS.

PATIENTS AND METHOD

Between April 2002 and December 2007, patients with a diagnosis of DCIS and who underwent a sentinel node biopsy were included in the study. In our centre the sentinel node biopsy was performed in patients with DCIS who required a mastectomy, high grade and >2cm DCIS and palpable DCIS.

RESULTS

Forty-seven patients were included in the study. In all cases the sentinel node was identified. Twenty-five (53.1%) patients underwent a mastectomy due to extensive DCIS; 14 of these (56%) with immediate reconstruction with implants. Twenty-five (53.1%) patients had high grade DCIS. In 7 (14.8%) patients the tumour was palpable. Fourteen patients (29.7%) were upgraded to invasive breast cancer in the definitive histology. In 2 (4.2%) patients who underwent a mastectomy a positive sentinel node was found.

CONCLUSIONS

Performing sentinel node biopsy in this group of DCIS patients has lead us to identify 4% of patients with positive sentinel nodes. Furthermore, 29.7% of the patients have avoided a second invasive diagnostic procedure for definitive histology. For these reasons we consider it appropiate to perform sentinel node biopsy in this subgroup of patients with DCIS of the breast.

The sentinel lymph node procedure for patients with preoperative diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ: risk factors for unsuspected invasive disease and for metastatic sentinel lymph nodes

BACKGROUND

Occult invasive disease could be found at definitive histology in patients initially diagnosed with large ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy is a reliable and minimally invasive procedure providing axillary information and avoiding a second operation in this particular group of patients. The aim of our study was to assess the value of SLN biopsy in patients with large DCIS who are at highest risk for being upstaged to invasive carcinoma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The study included 195 patients diagnosed with DCIS upon initial core biopsy and undergoing SLN biopsy. Many features were correlated with the presence of unsuspected invasive disease and positive SLN biopsy using univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

Of the 110 patients with pure DCIS, seven patients (6%) had a metastatic lymph node; 31 patients (16%) were found to have invasive disease upon final histology. Univariate analysis of predictors of unsuspected invasive carcinoma showed that patients having a preoperative biopsy that indicated DCIS with microinvasion (DCISM) or large DCIS were at a higher risk of invasive carcinoma after histological examination of the operative specimen. Of the 31 patients who were upstaged to invasive carcinoma at final histology, seven patients (22%) had a positive SLN biopsy. The analysis of predictors of positive SLN in our study shows that diffuse DCIS requiring mastectomy is the main risk factor for SLN metastasis.

CONCLUSION

There are no real predictive factors for invasive disease in patients with an initial diagnosis of DCIS or DCISM. Our study supports the value of SLN biopsy in patients with a preoperative DCISM biopsy or patients with a large pure DCIS biopsy requiring mastectomy.

The value of sentinel lymph node biopsy in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and DCIS with microinvasion of the breast

AIM

Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) refers to the preinvasive stage of breast carcinoma and should not give axillary metastases. Its diagnosis, however, is subject to sampling errors. The role of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in management of DCIS or DCISM (with microinvasion) remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to review our experience with SLNB in DCIS and DCISM.

METHODS

A review of 51 patients with a diagnosis of DCIS (n=45) or DCISM (n=6), who underwent SLNB and a definitive breast operation between January 1999 and December 2006, was performed.

RESULTS

In 10 patients (19.6%) definitive histology revealed an invasive carcinoma. SLN (micro)metastases were detected in 5 out of 51 patients, of whom 2 had a preoperative diagnosis of grade III DCIS and 3 of DCISM. Three patients (75%) had micrometastases (< 2 mm) only. In 2 patients, histopathology demonstrated a macrometastasis (> 2 mm). All 5 patients underwent axillary dissection. No additional positive axillary lymph nodes were found.

CONCLUSIONS

In case of a preoperative diagnosis of grade III DCIS or a grade II DCIS with comedo necrosis and DCIS with microinvasion, an SLNB procedure has to be considered because in almost 20% of the patients an invasive carcinoma is found after surgery. In this case the SLNB procedure becomes less reliable after a lumpectomy or ablation has been performed. SLN (micro)metastases were detected in nearly 10% of the patients. The prognostic significance of individual tumour cells remains unclear.

Recent advances and current controversies in the management of DCIS of the breast

Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is commonly diagnosed today, mainly due to widespread use of screening mammography. Despite a better understanding of its biological behavior, many issues regarding its optimal management remain controversial. The biological behavior of DCIS has been associated with distinct molecular and histological features (such as expression of COX2, Ki67, c-erbB2, p53 mutation, presence or absence of comedonecrosis, nuclear grade, hormone receptor status, etc.). Recent advances in the diagnosis of DCIS include using magnetic resonance imaging, and the use of stereotactic-guided directional vacuum-assisted biopsy (DVAB). Ductoscopy and ductal lavage have a limited role in the management of DCIS. Surgical treatment of DCIS includes simple local excision to various forms of wider excision (segmental resection or quadrantectomy), or even mastectomy (either simple or skin-sparing). Radiotherapy following breast-conserving surgery significantly reduces local recurrence rates. Axillary lymph node dissection is not required for the management of DCIS; however, during the last decade, sentinel lymph node biopsy is increasingly used to exclude the presence of axillary metastases (when invasive disease is present within the DCIS). This approach has many advantages (including the avoidance of a second surgery if invasive disease is diagnosed within the DCIS) and should be considered when there is an increased probability for the presence of invasive breast cancer within the DCIS. The role of other minimally invasive methods (such as the "therapeutic" application of the DVAB technique, radiofrequency ablation, laser therapy, cryotherapy and brachytherapy) in the management of small DCIS remains unproven. Tamoxifen should be considered in the management of selected patients with DCIS, such as patients with hormone receptor positive DCIS, young patients, and patients without risk factors for potential side effects. Additionally, and controversial, there is evidence that aromatase inhibitors may be better than tamoxifen in the management of DCIS.

Meta-analysis of sentinel node biopsy in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast

BACKGROUND

The need for sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy in patients with a preoperative diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is debated. Advocates recommend such biopsy based on a high incidence of SLN involvement in some series. Opponents discourage SLN biopsy based on a perceived low incidence of nodal involvement in this setting. These contradictory arguments are generally based on small studies. The present study is a meta-analysis of the reported data on the incidence of SLN metastasis in patients with DCIS.

METHODS

A search of electronic databases identified studies reporting the frequency of SLN metastases in DCIS. The random-effects method was used to combine data.

RESULTS

Twenty-two published series were included in the meta-analysis. The estimate for the incidence of SLN metastases in patients with a preoperative diagnosis of DCIS was 7.4 (95 per cent confidence interval (c.i.) 6.2 to 8.9) per cent compared with 3.7 (95 per cent c.i. 2.8 to 4.8) per cent in patients with a definitive (postoperative) diagnosis of DCIS alone. This was a significant difference with an odds ratio of 2.11 (95 per cent c.i. 1.15 to 2.93).

CONCLUSION

Patients with a preoperative diagnosis of DCIS should be considered for SLN biopsy.

[Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast (DCIS) under 40: a specific management?]

Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast (DCIS) is rare in younger women, accounting for about 4% of all cases of DCIS in France, and tends to be diagnosed by clinical findings or casually, after plastic surgery. After breast conserving treatment, young age ( less than 40) is a predictive factor of relapses in patients with DCIS. Age may serve as one more parameter that should be considered in the complex decision-making process necessary to create a treatment plan for a woman with DCIS. Breast conservative treatment (BCT) could be used if: margins are free and more than 10 mm; if DCIS size is less than 11 mm and DCIS is free of necrosis and comedocarcinoma. Mastectomy ought to be proposed in case of: multifocal DCIS, or DCIS size more than 30 mm; invaded margins after re-excision; radiotherapy contraindicated; small breasts and patient choice. Immediate breast reconstruction should be proposed for patients with all the poor predictive factors. In other cases, treatment procedure will be explained to the patient and the treatment will be chosen by the patient in consultation with the medical team (radiologist, surgeon, pathologist and oncologist). Radiotherapy with boost or hormonotherapy with tamoxifen should not be used routinely but may be proposed individually.

Role of primary tumor characteristics in predicting positive sentinel lymph nodes in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ or microinvasive breast cancer

BACKGROUND

We determined the incidence of positive sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) or microinvasive breast cancer (MIC) and the predictive factors of SLN metastasis in these patients.

METHODS

Of 4,503 patients who underwent SLN dissection between March 1994 and March 2006 at our institution, we identified those with a preoperative diagnosis or final diagnosis of DCIS or MIC. Clinicopathologic factors were examined by logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

Of the 624 patients with a preoperative diagnosis of DCIS or MIC, 40 had positive SLNs (6.4%). Of the 475 patients with a final diagnosis of DCIS or MIC, 9 had positive SLNs (1.9%). Clinical DCIS size >5 cm was the only independent predictor of positive SLN for patients with a preoperative diagnosis and patients with a final diagnosis of DCIS or MIC. Core biopsy as the method of preoperative diagnosis and DCIS size >5 cm were independent predictors for a final diagnosis of invasive carcinoma in the 149 patients who had a preoperative diagnosis of DCIS or MIC.

CONCLUSIONS

SLN dissection for patients with a diagnosis of DCIS should be limited to patients who are planned for mastectomy or who have DCIS size >5 cm. Patients who have a core-needle biopsy diagnosis of DCIS have a higher risk of invasive breast cancer on final pathologic assessment of the primary tumor. This information can be used in preoperative counseling of patients with DCIS regarding the timing of SLN biopsy.

Sentinel node procedure is warranted in ductal carcinoma in situ with high risk of occult invasive carcinoma and microinvasive carcinoma treated by mastectomy

Axillary lymph node dissection in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast is not warranted because DCIS has no metastatic potential. However, the risk of microinvasive carcinoma (MIC) exists in large DCIS treated by mastectomy. The aim of this series is to evaluate the incidence of lymph node metastases in DCIS and DCIS-MIC. We analyzed retrospectively patients treated in six French cancer centers for pure DCIS or DCIS-MIC. Surgical procedures were lumpectomy or mastectomy associated with an axillary sentinel node (SN) procedure. We included 161 patients suffering from pure DCIS (116/161, 72%) or DCIS-MIC (45/161, 28%). Mean age was 56 years (32-78). We observed underestimation between core biopsy and histological result in 43/142 cases (30%). These data show an association between lesion size, solid subtype, high-grade DCIS, and underestimation. Forty-eight breast conservative procedures were performed and 113 mastectomies (70%). SN procedure was performed using blue dye, technetium, or both. In our series, we selected patients with a high risk of occult invasive carcinoma: high grade (55%), mean size (27 mm), and mastectomy (112). Six SN were found positive (3.7%). In the five patients treated with complete axillary dissection, the SN was the only positive node. SN in DCIS is an interesting procedure but not necessary for all patients. We need to focus on the subgroup with or a high risk of occult MIC: extensive calcifications or palpable mass, DCIS diagnosed by core biopsy and underestimation, multifocality, high grade, large tumor size, MIC, and mastectomy.

Sentinel node biopsy is not a standard procedure in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: the experience of the European institute of oncology on 854 patients in 10 years

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to assess the role of sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy in patients with pure ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast (DCIS) as a rationale for recommending the best managing option for the treatment of such patients in daily practice.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

DCIS cannot give rise to axillary metastases by definition. Axillary dissection is therefore not indicated. The role of SLN biopsy in the management of DCIS has not yet been established.

METHODS

From March 1996 to September 2006, 854 patients with pure DCIS underwent SLN biopsy at the European Institute of Oncology. Clinical and pathologic data were prospectively collected. When previous surgery or stereotactic biopsy had been performed elsewhere, all the histopathological preparations were reviewed. Patients with microinvasion were excluded from this investigation. Lymphatic mapping was performed using a radiocolloid technique.

RESULTS

SLN metastases were detected in 12 (1.4%) DCIS patients. In 7 cases, only micrometastases (<2 mm) were diagnosed and in 5 cases macrometastases. In addition, isolated tumoral cells (ITC) (<0.2 mm) were identified in 4 additional patients. Eleven patients underwent complete axillary dissection. None of these patients had additional positive axillary lymph nodes.

CONCLUSIONS

Because of the low prevalence of metastatic involvement, SLN biopsy should not be considered a standard procedure in the treatment of all patients with DCIS. The sole criteria for proposing SLN biopsy in DCIS should be when there exists any uncertainty regarding the presence of invasive foci at definitive histology.

Sentinel node biopsy is important in mastectomy for ductal carcinoma in situ

BACKGROUND

There is uncertainty about the utility of sentinel node biopsy (SNB) for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and its potential to avoid axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) in patients undergoing mastectomy for DCIS.

METHODS

A review was conducted of 179 patients who underwent mastectomy with sentinel node biopsy for DCIS without invasion or microinvasion on premastectomy pathology review.

RESULTS

The sentinel node identification rate was 98.9% (177/179). Twenty (11.3%) of 177 mastectomies for DCIS had a positive SNB: two micrometastasis (pN1mi) and 18 isolated tumor cells [pN0(i+)]. Unsuspected invasive cancer was found in 20 (11.2%) of 179 mastectomies, eight T1mic, five T1a, three T1b, and four T1c tumors. Sentinel nodes were identified in 19 of 20 patients with invasive cancer and four were positive: one pN1mi and three pN0(i+). Eighteen of 19 patients with unsuspected invasive cancer were able to avoid axillary dissection on the basis of SNB results. Of the 159 patients whose final pathology revealed DCIS without invasion, a sentinel node was identified in 158 (99.4%). The SNB was positive in 16 patients (10.1%): one pN1mi and 15 pN0(i+). Three patients underwent ALND on the basis of positive SNBs and in each the SNB was the only positive node.

CONCLUSIONS

11% of patients undergoing mastectomy for DCIS were found to have invasive cancer on final pathology. The use of SNB during mastectomy for DCIS allowed nearly all such patients to avoid axillary dissection. These results support routine use of SNB during mastectomy for DCIS.

259 Patients with DCIS of the breast applying USC/Van Nuys prognostic index: a retrospective review with long term follow up

BACKGROUND

The Van Nuys Prognostic Index (VNPI) is a simple score for predicting the risk of local recurrence (LR) in patients with Ductal Carcinoma In Situ (DCIS) conservatively treated. This score combines three independent predictors of Local Recurrence. The VNPI has recently been updated with the addition of age as a fourth parameter into the scoring system (University of Southern California/ VNPI).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Our database consisted of 408 women with DCIS. Applying the USC/VNPI we reviewed retrospectively 259 patients who were treated with breast conserving surgery with or without radiotherapy (RT). Of these patients 63.5% had a low VNPI score, 32% intermediate and 4.5% a high score. In the low score group, the majority of the patients underwent Conservative Surgery (CS) without RT while in the intermediate group, almost half of the patients received RT. Eighty-three percent (83%) of the patients with high VNPI were treated with Conservative Surgery plus RT. Nodal assessment by Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy was obtained in 32 patients since 2002.

RESULTS

Twenty-one Local Recurrences were observed (8%) with a mean follow up of 130 months: sixteen were invasive. No statistically significant differences in Disease Free Survival were reached in all groups of VNPI score between patients treated with Conservative Surgery or Conservative Surgery plus RT. However it was noted that the higher the VNPI score, the lower was the risk of local recurrence in the group treated additionally with RT, even though it was not statistically significant. Further analysis included those patients treated with Conservative Surgery alone and followed up. Disease-free survival (DFS) at 10 years was 94% with low VNPI and 83% in both intermediate and high score (P < 0.05). No significant differences were observed in the subgroups of VNPI. The Local Relapse rate after Conservative Surgery alone, increased with tumor size, margin width, and pathology classification (P < 0,05), while age was not found to be a significant factor. Lesions with only mammographic appearances are associated with lower DFS but it did not reach significance (P = ns), while assumption of estrogenic hormones and familial history of breast cancer are significant factors associated with a higher risk of local recurrence. After multivariate analysis including seven clinical and pathological factors, the only significant predictors of local recurrence remained margin width of surgical excision, previous therapy with estrogens (contraceptives or Hormone Replacement Therapy) and the Van Nuys pathologic classification. The overall survival breast cancer specific was 99% and no differences were observed between groups (P = ns). The comparison of patients treated with a total mastectomy and those conservatively treated showed a significantly better local relapse free survival rate obtained with mastectomy (98.2% vs. 89.7% at 10 years P = 0.02). However, the overall cause-specific survival did not prove any better outcome (98.7% in both groups). Of the 32 patients who underwent a Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy, four were found to have micrometastases and all of them had a previous Directional Vacuum Assisted Biopsy.

CONCLUSIONS

Although in our series there is not a significant difference in LR rates by the parameter of age, the new USC/VNPI is still a simple and reliable scoring system for therapeutic management of DCIS. We did not find any statistically significant advantage in groups treated with the addition of RT. Obtaining wide surgical margins appears to be the strongest prognostic factor for local recurrence, regardless of other pathological factors or the addition of adjuvant radiation therapy. However, only prospective randomized studies can precisely predict the risk of LR of conservatively treated DCIS. The clinical significance of Sentinel Lymph Nodes micrometastases Immuno-Histo-Chemistry-detected found in DCIS patients remains uncertain. However, we hypothesize that the anatomical disruption after preoperative biopsy procedures increases the likelihood of epithelial cell displacement and the frequency of IHC-positive Sentinel Lymph Nodes, both of which are directly proportional to the degree of manipulation.

Role of sentinel lymph node biopsy in high-risk ductal carcinoma in situ patients

BACKGROUND

The role of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is poorly defined. However, up to 20% of patients with DCIS will have invasive carcinoma; these patients require staging for axillary metastasis. The aim of this study was to identify patients with a core biopsy diagnosis of DCIS who may benefit from SLNB.

METHODS

In a prospective study, we performed SLNB on patients with a preoperative diagnosis of >2.5 cm of high-grade DCIS or DCIS when mastectomy was indicated.

RESULTS

Sixty-two patients underwent surgery for high-grade DCIS, and 35 of these patients underwent SLNB. Postsurgical excision histology revealed invasive disease in 20 patients, 19 of whom had undergone SLNB. Before the adoption of SLNB in selected DCIS patients, all 20 with occult invasive disease would have required second surgery axillary staging (P < .01, chi-square test).

CONCLUSIONS

SLNB should not be performed routinely for all patients with an initial diagnosis of DCIS. However, selective lymphadenectomy may be a useful clinical adjuvant in selected high-risk DCIS patients.

Cancer canalaire in situ du sein avec micro-invasion. Place du ganglion sentinelle

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the role of sentinel lymph node biopsy for microinvasive ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From January 2001 to January 2006, lymphatic mapping was performed using radiocolloid and/or blue dye technique. Full axillary lymph node dissection was accomplished systematically in 10 instances at the beginning of the study, and furthermore when the sentinel node was involved (macrometastatic or micrometastatic disease).

RESULTS

Identification rate was 98% (40/41), the unsuccessful procedure occurred after incisional biopsy for diagnosis. The number of sentinel nodes removed was 2 in average (1-5). Sentinel node involvement was found in 10% of cases (4/40): 1 sentinel node macrometastasis pN1, 2 sentinel node micrometastases determined by hematoxylin and eosin staining pN1 (mi), 1 sentinel node micrometastasis detected only by immunohistochemical staining pN0 (mi).

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

Sentinel lymph node sampling should not be currently applied for management of every ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast but a selective utilization is proposed in documented high risk subset of patients according to clinical, mammographic, and histologic features obtained by percutaneous biopsies. Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) with proved or suspected microinvasion could be scheduled for sentinel node procedure a fortiori in cases undergoing mastectomy because of extensive DCIS before the occurrence of disturbances of lymphatic drainage induced by surgical breast dissection.

Is there an indication for sentinel node biopsy in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast? A review

Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast is defined as a proliferation of malignant epithelial cells within breast ducts without evidence of invasion through the basement membrane. The detection rate of DCIS of the breast has dramatically increased since the mid-1980s as the result of the widespread use of screening mammography. DCIS currently represents about 15-25% of all breast cancers detected in population screening programmes. Although inherently a non-invasive disease, occult invasion with the potential of lymph node metastases may occur. Where performing an axillary lymph node dissection-or-not for DCIS used to be an important dilemma, the same now holds for the sentinel node biopsy. This article reviews the potential role of the sentinel node biopsy (SNB) in patients with DCIS. We conclude that based on the current literature, there is in general no role for a SNB in DCIS. A SNB should only be considered in patients with an excisional biopsy diagnosis of high risk DCIS (grade III with palpable mass or large tumour area by imaging) as well as in patients undergoing mastectomy after a core or excisional biopsy diagnosis of DCIS, although SNB may be contraindicated in many of the latter patients because of lesion size and/or multifocality. Even in these patients the value of a positive SN, containing mostly isolated tumour cells, is questionable.

Role of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Ductal Carcinoma-in-situ Treated by Mastectomy

BACKGROUND

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is a widely accepted alternative to axillary lymph node dissection in invasive breast cancer. Its role in ductal carcinoma-in-situ (DCIS) is unclear. The purpose of this study was to determine factors associated with the subsequent diagnosis of invasive disease and to determine the role of SLNB when performing a mastectomy for DCIS.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted of all mastectomies performed on patients with a preoperative diagnosis of DCIS between 2000 and 2005 at a single tertiary-care institution.

RESULTS

Ninety mastectomies for DCIS were included, 54 (60%) of which were performed with concurrent SLNB. Of 44 patients diagnosed preoperatively with DCIS by core biopsy only, 34 patients (63%) had a concurrent SLNB, while 10 patients (28%) were treated with mastectomy alone (P < .01). Overall, 30 patients (33%) had invasive disease, 22 of whom received concurrent SLNB. Seven SLNB patients (13%) had positive SLNs. On univariate analysis, multifocality (P = .03), multicentricity (P = .01), comedonecrosis (P = .01), and diagnosis by core biopsy (P < .001) were associated with invasive disease on pathology. On multivariate analysis, comedonecrosis (P = .04) and diagnosis by core biopsy (P < .01) were independent predictors for invasion. There was no statistically significant predictor for sentinel lymph node metastasis.

CONCLUSIONS

Approximately one-third of patients with DCIS treated with mastectomy at our institution later had invasive disease, and factors associated with invasion have been identified. On the basis of our results, routine SLNB is recommended in this patient population.

Sentinel lymph node metastasis from mammary ductal carcinoma in situ with microinvasion

Axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ with microinvasion (DCISM) of the breast was controversial, because of the relevant morbidity incurred by the procedure and the low incidence of axillary involvement. The introduction of the sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy as a minimally invasive procedure for axillary staging has prompted new interest in this issue. However, as DCISM is a rare type of cancer, data on the incidence of SLN metastasis are scarce. The aim of the present paper was therefore to assess the prevalence of SLN metastasis in a multi-institutional series of DCISM patients, in order to ascertain whether SLN biopsy might be justified as a standard procedure in the presence of microinvasive cancer. Between 1999 and 2004, 43 patients with a diagnosis of DCISM underwent SLN biopsy. Microinvasion was defined as one or more foci of invasion beyond the basal membrane, none exceeding 1mm. SLNs were examined following haematoxylin-eosin and immunohistochemical staining. SLN metastases were found in four out of 43 cases (9.3%). In one patient, SLN contained only micrometastasis. All four patients with positive SLN underwent complete ALND and in all these cases further metastatic axillary nodes were found. In conclusion, given the relevant incidence of nodal metastases and the low morbidity of the procedure, we believe that SLN biopsy should be considered in all patients with a diagnosis of DCISM. In cases of SLN involvement, even if micrometastatic, our policy is to perform a complete ALND.

Is it possible to refine the indication for sentinel node biopsy in high-risk ductal carcinoma in situ?

BACKGROUND

The indication for sentinel node biopsy (SNB) has not been fully established yet for patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS).

AIM

To relate the conversion rate to invasive carcinoma with sentinel node positivity in high risk DCIS, and to refine the clinical presentation analysis in order to better select patients for SNB. For this purpose, a risk score was devised.

METHODS

From 1998 to 2005, 151 high-risk DCIS patients from six clinical centres were included in a prospective sentinel node database. The conversion rate to invasive carcinoma was 39%. Ten of 142 (7%) successful SNBs showed a positive sentinel node (eight micrometastatic). The sentinel node was positive in 1% of pure DCIS, in 5.5% of DCIS with micro-invasion, and in 19.5% of invasive carcinoma.

RESULTS

Both clinical presentation and corresponding risk score were closely related to conversion to invasive carcinoma. The association of risk score and sentinel node positivity approached but did not reach statistical significance (P=0.06); therefore a subset of further selected higher risk patients could not be defined.

CONCLUSION

The relevance of SNB positivity cannot be overlooked in high-risk DCIS patients, however, because SNB is not free from morbidity and cost, more studies are needed to refine its final indication.

What is the value of axillary dissection or sentinel node biopsy in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ?

BACKGROUND

Some surgeons have advocated sentinel node biopsy (SNB) for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). The value of the information obtained is not clear.

METHODS

From 1972 to 2005, 564 selected patients with pure DCIS had axillary staging with either SNB or axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). Data were collected in a prospective database.

RESULTS

Only 2 of 564 patients had positive nodes by hematoxylin and eosin, and they were both in the ALND group. Both patients had mastectomies, were upstaged, received chemotherapy, and survived for more than 10 years without local or distant recurrence. Among 171 patients who had SNB, 10 had isolated tumor cells found by immunohistochemistry. Two patients who underwent SNB had local recurrence, neither developed distant or regional recurrence. Six of 564 patients in the ALND group developed local invasive recurrence and died of metastatic breast cancer, but none of them had positive nodes.

CONCLUSIONS

Information from lymph node examination in DCIS patients failed to predict poor outcome. SNB is useful for DCIS in mastectomy, especially with immediate reconstruction. It may be indicated for DCIS at high risk for upgrading to invasive cancer on final excision, but reliable criteria for identifying these tumors are not yet available.

Sentinel lymph node positivity of patients with ductal carcinoma in situ or microinvasive breast cancer

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to determine the rates of sentinel lymph node (SLN) positivity in patients with a final diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) or microinvasive breast cancer (MIC).

METHODS

One hundred thirty patients underwent SLN mapping from 1998 to 2003 for DCIS or MIC.

RESULTS

One hundred nine patients with DCIS and 21 with MIC underwent SLN mapping. One patient with bilateral DCIS underwent 2 SLN procedures; therefore, the results of 131 SLN procedures are included. On hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining, 4 of 110 patients (3.6%) with DCIS had positive SLNs. Four additional patients had positive SLNs by IHC staining only (3.6%). Two of 8 patients underwent completion axillary dissection, and neither had additional involved nodes on completion axillary dissection. One of the 21 patients with MIC had positive SLNs by hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) (4.8%), and another had an involved SLN by IHC staining (4.8%). The patient with the positive SLN by H&E had 1 additional node on completion axillary dissection.

CONCLUSION

Rates of SLN positivity for patients with DCIS are modest, even in a high-risk population, and there is continuing uncertainty about its clinical importance.

Ductal carcinoma in situ: Value of sentinel lymph node biopsy

BACKGROUND

Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) represents about 20% of newly diagnosed breast carcinomas. Axillary metastasis is often related to undiagnosed DCIS with microinvasion (DCISM). The aim of this study was to confirm the interest of sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy in extensive DCIS.

METHODS

Patients with a diagnosis of DCIS or DCISM and axillary lymph node evaluation were selected. Surgical treatment included SLN biopsy and/or axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). Serial sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and with an immunohistochemical (IHC) method. When a micrometastasis was found, the breast specimen was revised searching for occult microinvasion.

RESULTS

Hundred and forty patients with initial DCIS were enrolled in the study. Node metastasis was identified in 9 patients (7%) of the 128 patients with DCIS and DCISM. At final histology, 4 (10%) of the 39 patients with pure DCIS and SLN biopsy and 1 (7%) of the 14 patients with DCISM and SLN biopsy had axillary micrometastasis. Four of the 12 patients upstaged to invasive carcinoma had metastatic SLNs.

CONCLUSIONS

Sentinel lymph node biopsy is valuable in patients with diffuse DCIS or DCISM who are scheduled for mastectomy in order to search for axillary micrometastases and occult breast microinvasion.

The role of sentinel lymph node biopsy in ductal carcinoma in situ

AIM

To review the role of sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy in the surgical management of patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS).

METHODS

A search was conducted of Medline and the National Library of Medicine to identify key articles concerning DCIS, SLN biopsy (SLNB) and axillary dissection. Further relevant articles were obtained from the references cited in the literature.

RESULTS

Up to 20% of patients with a core biopsy diagnosis of DCIS will be later up-staged based on an invasive component identified on the excision specimen. Quality assurance in breast screening programmes requires minimally invasive pre-operative diagnosis and also axillary sampling in the case of documented invasive disease. As an effective and validated procedure, SLNB represents a paradigm shift in the surgical management of the axilla for patients with invasive breast cancer. It remains undefined which, if any, subgroups of patients with DCIS should undergo SLNB.

CONCLUSION

Axillary lymphadenectomy is an overtreatment for patients with DCIS. Performing a SLNB during the initial procedure may avoid a second operation in some DCIS patients who are diagnosed with occult invasive disease at their definitive operation. When predictors of hidden invasive disease are clarified by further study, SLNB may be used in the management of selected high-risk DCIS patients.

An update of sentinel lymph node mapping in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of our study is to further clarify the incidence of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) patients that are upstaged upon final pathology and/or have metastatic disease in the axilla.

METHODS

All patients were diagnosed with DCIS or DCIS with microinvasion (DCISm) on their diagnostic biopsy and received a sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy between 1994 and 2004. Six hundred seventy-five patients were divided into 613 patients with DCIS and 62 patients with DCISm.

RESULTS

Sixty-six of 675 (10%) were upstaged to invasive cancer. Fifty-five of 613 (9%) patients with DCIS were upstaged, whereas 11 of 62 (18%) patients with DCISm were upstaged. Forty-nine of 675 (7%) patients had +SLN. Twenty-two of 49 (45%) patients with +SLN had invasive carcinoma or DCISm on final histology.

CONCLUSIONS

After review of histology, grade, type of biopsy, and mammographic findings, the combined findings of high grade, mass by mammography, and microinvasion predict patients at higher risk for invasive carcinoma. Selective utilization of SLN biopsy in DCIS is recommended.

Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in the Management of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) has been adopted by some physicians in the evaluation of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). In a review of the current literature, we found no convincing data that SLNB is warranted as standard of care in newly diagnosed DCIS. Although lymph node invasion is present in 2% of women with traditional axillary lymph node dissection (ALND), as a result of the excellent prognosis of DCIS, it is not recommended. However, the detailed evaluation of the lymph node(s) with SLNB raises the issue that perhaps patients at risk for recurrence can be identified early and be treated aggressively without the morbidity associated with ALND. Limited data suggest that, with the use of more sensitive methods for detection of cytokeratin-positive cells, the prevalence of positive lymph nodes in pure DCIS is approximately 2%-13%. In high-risk DCIS or DCIS with microinvasion, the prevalence is 8%-20%. Several limited retrospective studies with long-term follow-up have not demonstrated an adverse relapse-free or overall survival effect for women with immunohistochemically (IHC) positive cells in the lymph nodes compared with those with negative IHC results in the lymph nodes. Sentinel lymph node biopsy in DCIS is associated with known risks, and health care benefits, if any, have not been demonstrated. Sentinel lymph node biopsy is not recommended in patients with DCIS.

Role of axillary sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with pure ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast

BACKGROUND

Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy is an effective tool for axillary staging in patients with invasive breast cancer. This procedure has been recently proposed as part of the treatment for patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), because cases of undetected invasive foci and nodal metastases occasionally occur. However, the indications for SLN biopsy in DCIS patients are controversial. The aim of the present study was therefore to assess the incidence of SLN metastases in a series of patients with a diagnosis of pure DCIS.

METHODS

A retrospective evaluation was made of a series of 102 patients who underwent SLN biopsy, and had a final histologic diagnosis of pure DCIS. Patients with microinvasion were excluded from the analysis. The patients were operated on in five Institutions between 1999 and 2004. Subdermal or subareolar injection of 30-50 MBq of 99 m-Tc colloidal albumin was used for SLN identification. All sentinel nodes were evaluated with serial sectioning, haematoxylin and eosin staining, and immunohistochemical analysis for cytocheratin.

RESULTS

Only one patient (0.98%) was SLN positive. The primary tumour was a small micropapillary intermediate-grade DCIS and the SLN harboured a micrometastasis. At pathologic revision of the specimen, no detectable focus of microinvasion was found.

CONCLUSION

Our findings indicate that SLN metastases in pure DCIS are a very rare occurrence. SLN biopsy should not therefore be routinely performed in patients who undergo resection for DCIS. SLN mapping can be performed, as a second operation, in cases in which an invasive component is identified in the specimen. Only DCIS patients who require a mastectomy should have SLN biopsy performed at the time of breast operation, since in these cases subsequent node mapping is not feasible.

Core biopsy diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ: An indication for sentinel lymph node biopsy

BACKGROUND

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is a minimally invasive, accurate method of evaluating axillary lymph nodes in patients with invasive cancer. The technique has also been applied successfully in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). The purpose of this study was to review our experience performing SLNB in patients with a biopsy diagnosis of DCIS.

METHODS

A prospective study of consecutive patients seen at our institution from August 2001 to April 2004 with a biopsy diagnosis of DCIS was undertaken. Demographic data, biopsy method, final pathology, and surgical treatment were recorded. Patients undergoing SLNB were identified, and pathologic results were noted.

RESULTS

Eighty-five patients with a biopsy diagnosis of DCIS were treated. Fifty-five (64.7%) had their diagnosis made by excisional biopsy, and 30 (35.3%) by core biopsy. Forty-four (51.7%) patients underwent SLNB as part of their definitive surgical procedure, and an SLN was successfully identified in 41 (93.2%). Nine (22.0%) patients who underwent successful SLNB had a positive SLN, 2 by hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining and 7 by immunohistochemical (IHC) staining for cytokeratin. Both patients with H&E-positive SLN were ultimately found to have invasive disease in their primary lesion. Final pathologic assessment of all primary lesions revealed invasive carcinoma in 7, 6 of whom had their diagnosis made by core biopsy. Overall, 20.0% of patients with a core biopsy diagnosis of DCIS were upstaged to invasive disease. Whether the lesion was palpable, grade and the presence or absence of necrosis were not significantly different in patients ultimately found to have invasive disease versus those who did not.

DISCUSSION

Sentinel lymph node biopsy can be performed accurately in patients with a biopsy diagnosis of DCIS. The rate of axillary disease in patients with pure, completely resected DCIS is low; therefore, SLNB is not indicated in all patients with this biopsy diagnosis. Because of a high rate of invasive disease on the final pathology of patients with DCIS diagnosed by core biopsy, these patients should be offered SLNB.