Surgical complications in solitary pancreas and combined pancreas-kidney transplantations

Risk Factors for Early Pancreatic Allograft Thrombosis Following Simultaneous Pancreas-Kidney Transplantation: A Systematic Review

Simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) transplantation remains the most effective treatment for providing consistent and long-term euglycemia in patients having type 1 diabetes with renal failure. Thrombosis of the pancreatic vasculature continues to contribute significantly to early graft failure and loss. We compared the rate of thrombosis to graft loss and systematically reviewed risk factors impacting early thrombosis of the pancreas allograft following SPK transplantation. We searched the MEDLINE, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library, and PREMEDLINE databases for studies reporting thrombosis following pancreas transplantation. Identified publications were screened for inclusion and synthesized into a data extraction sheet. Sixty-three studies satisfied eligibility criteria: 39 cohort studies, 22 conference abstracts, and 2 meta-analyses. Newcastle-Ottawa Scale appraisal of included studies demonstrated cohort studies of low bias risk; 1127 thrombi were identified in 15 936 deceased donor, whole pancreas transplants, conferring a 7.07% overall thrombosis rate. Thrombosis resulted in pancreatic allograft loss in 83.3% of reported cases. This review has established significant associations between donor and recipient characteristics, procurement and preservation methodology, transplantation technique, postoperative management, and increased risk of early thrombosis in the pancreas allograft. Further studies examining the type of organ preservation fluid, prophylactic heparin protocol, and exocrine drainage method and early thrombosis should also be performed.

Pancreas preservation time as a predictor of prolonged hospital stay after pancreas transplantation

Objective

Length of hospital stay is a sensitive indicator of short-term prognosis. In this retrospective study, we investigated how pancreas preservation time affects length of hospital stay after pancreas transplantation.

Methods

Patients receiving pancreas transplantation (1998.7–2018.6) were identified from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients database and grouped according to pancreas preservation time. We analyzed the relationship of pancreas preservation time with graft and patient survival and prolonged length of stay (PLOS; i.e., hospital stay ≥20 days).

Results

We included 18,099 pancreas transplants in the survival analysis. Pancreas preservation time >20 hours had a significantly higher risk of graft failure than 8 to 12 hours. Pancreas preservation time was not significantly associated with patient survival. We included 17,567 pancreas transplants in the analysis for PLOS. Compared with 8 to 12 hours, pancreas preservation time >12 hours had a significantly higher PLOS risk, which increased with increased pancreas preservation time. In simultaneous pancreas–kidney transplantation, we also found that pancreas preservation time was positively associated with PLOS risk with pancreas preservation time >12 hours.

Conclusion

Pancreas preservation time is a sensitive predictor of PLOS. Transplant centers should minimize pancreas preservation time to optimize patient outcomes.

Outcomes of pancreas retransplantation in patients with pancreas graft failure

Background

Pancreas retransplantation is still a controversial option after loss of a pancreatic graft. This article describes the experience of pancreas retransplantation at a high‐volume centre.

Methods

This was a retrospective observational study of all pancreas retransplantations performed in a single centre between 1997 and 2013. Pancreatic graft loss was defined by the return to insulin dependence. Risk factors for graft loss as well as patient and graft survival were analysed using logistic and time‐to‐event regression models.

Results

Of 409 pancreas transplantations undertaken, 52 (12·7 per cent) were identified as pancreas retransplantations. After a median follow‐up of 65·0 (range 0·8–174·3) months, 1‐ and 5‐year graft survival rates were 79 and 69 per cent respectively, and 1‐ and 5‐year patient survival rates were 96 and 89 per cent. During the entire follow‐up, 22 grafts (42 per cent) were lost. Patient survival was not associated with any of the donor‐ or recipient‐related factors investigated. Five‐year graft survival was better after simultaneous kidney–pancreas retransplantation than pancreas retransplantation alone: 80 per cent (16 of 20) versus 63 per cent (20 of 32) (P = 0·226). Acute rejection (odds ratio 4·49, 95 per cent c.i. 1·59 to 12·68; P = 0·005) and early surgical complications (OR 3·29, 1·09 to 9·99, P = 0·035) were identified as factors with an independent negative effect on graft survival.

Conclusion

Pancreas retransplantation may be considered for patients whose previous graft has failed.

Good outcome in selected patients

Pancreas transplantation: Advantages of a retroperitoneal graft position

INTRODUCTION

In the 50 years since the first pancreas transplant performed at the University of Minnesota, the surgical techniques employed have undergone many modifications. Techniques such as retroperitoneal graft placement have further improved the ability to reproduce the physiology of the «native» pancreas. We herein present our experience of a modified technique for pancreatic transplant, with the organ placed into a fully retroperitoneal position with systemic venous and enteric drainage of the graft by duodeno-duodenostomy.

METHODS

All pancreas transplantations performed between May 2016 and January 2017 were prospectively entered into our transplant database and retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 10 transplants were performed using the retroperitoneal technique (6 men: median age of 41 years [IQR 36-54]). Median cold ischemia times was 10,30h [IQR 5,30-12,10]. The preservation solution used was Celsior (n=7), IGL-1 (n=2), and UW (n=1). No complications related to the new surgical technique were identified. In one patient, transplantectomy at 12h was performed due to graft thrombosis, probably related to ischemic conditions from a donor with prolonged cardio-respiratory arrest. Another procedure was aborted without completing the graft implant due to an intraoperative immediate arterial thrombosis in a patient with severe iliac atheromatosis. No primary pancreas non-function occurred in the remaining 8patients. The median hospital stay was 13,50 days [IQR 10-27].

CONCLUSIONS

Retroperitoneal graft placement appears feasible with easy access for dissection the vascular site; comfortable technical vascular reconstruction; and a decreased risk of intestinal obstruction by separation of the small bowel from the pancreas graft.

Long-term outcomes of pancreas after kidney transplantation in small centers: is it justified?

BACKGROUND

Currently, the long-term advantages of having a pancreas transplantation (PT) are debated, particularly in patients receiving pancreas after kidney (PAK) allografts. The United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) requires that a transplant center perform a minimum number of PT per year to remain an active PT center. The long-term outcomes and challenges of PAK in small pancreas transplant centers are not well studied.

METHODS

In this retrospective analysis, we report short- and long-term outcomes in a small center performing 2-9 PT annually.

RESULTS

Forty-eight PT (25 simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplantation [SPK], 23 PAK) were performed in our center. Donor and recipient demographics were similar in both groups. All suitable local donors were used for SPK. All organs for PAK transplantation were imported from other UNOS regions. Mean follow-up was 61 ± 46 and 74 ± 46 months for SPK and PAK, respectively. Patient and graft survival rates were similar in SPK and PAK groups and better than the reported national average. Four patients (11%) died (1 due to trauma, 1 brain lymphoma, 1 ruptured aneurysm; and 1 unknown cause). Two patients (4%; 1 SPK, 1 PAK) lost their grafts because of thrombosis on postoperative days 3 and 5 in 2002. No graft thrombosis occurred since 2002. Seven patients (15%) required reoperation (4 for bleeding, 2 anastomotic leaks, 1 small bowel perforation). Two patients (4%) developed post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disease. Five patients (11%) experienced cytomegalovirus antigenemia which responded well to antiviral therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with outcomes for diabetic patients on dialysis, current SPK and PAK short- and long-term results are favorable even in a small PT center. Therefore, unless there is a contraindication, PT should be offered to all type 1 diabetic patients with end-stage renal disease at the time of kidney transplantation or afterward.

Vascular complications of transplantation: part 2: pancreatic transplants

Vascular complications after solid organ transplantation are not uncommon and may lead to graft dysfunction and ultimately graft loss. A thorough understanding of the surgical anatomy, etiologies, and types of vascular complications, their presentation and the options for management are important for managing these complex patients. This article reviews the basic surgical anatomy, the vascular complications, and endovascular management options of vascular complications in patients with pancreas transplants.

Pancreatic graft survival despite partial vascular graft thrombosis due to splenocephalic anastomoses

Thrombotic complications following pancreas transplantation are still the most common cause of nonimmunologic graft loss. The aim of this study was to analyze pancreatic graft function after partial arterial graft thrombosis and the investigation of the pancreatic arterial anatomy with regard to intraparenchymal anastomoses. We retrospectively analyzed the data for 175 consecutive pancreas transplants performed between January 2002 and October 2007. Selective Y-graft angiography was performed in 10 and rubber-milk injection in 5 fresh pancreas specimens. Thrombosis of one leg of the Y-graft was diagnosed in 18 (10.3%) patients. Only one of these patients with thrombosis of the splenic artery required exogenous insulin. Sufficient graft perfusion was demonstrated in all of the remaining grafts. One graft was lost due to acute rejection. In all specimens angiography showed an excellent perfusion of the pancreaticoduodenal arcade, even after selective cannulation of the splenic artery. Arterial collaterals between the gastroduodenal, splenic artery and the superior mesenteric artery were demonstrated. Our results demonstrate that global perfusion of the pancreatic graft and sufficient graft function is sustained after the thrombotic occlusion of one branch of the Y-graft by a complex system of intraparenchymal anastomoses. These anatomical findings may have consequences for resection strategies in pancreas surgery.

Surgical techniques for pancreas transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Pancreas transplantation reproducibly induces insulin independence in beta-cell penic diabetic patients. The difference between full insulin independence, partial graft function, and graft loss, mostly results from technical failure, graft rejection, and patient death with function graft. The purpose of this review is to examine recent surgical advances and discuss their contribution to improved graft function.

RECENT FINDINGS

Few actual surgical innovations were described in the period reviewed. Duodenoduodenostomy is an interesting option for drainage of digestive secretions, when the pancreas is placed behind the right colon and is oriented cephalad. The main advantage of this technique is easy endoscopic assessment of donor duodenum but, when allograft pancreatectomy is necessary, repair of native duodenum may be troublesome. Selective revascularization of the gastroduodenal artery, at the back-table, possibly improves blood supply to the head of the pancreas graft and duodenal segment. There is no proof that this additional maneuver is always beneficial, although it can be graft saving in case of poor segmental graft perfusion.

SUMMARY

Transplant surgeons should be familiar with all techniques for pancreas transplantation. Long-term graft function is possible only after technically successful pancreas transplantation. There is clearly a need for more objective assessment and standardization of surgical techniques for pancreas transplantation.

Treatment of Enterocutaneous Fistula in Pancreas Transplant Recipients Using Percutaneous Drainage and Fibrin Sealant: Three Case Reports

Complications involving the enteric anastomosis site, including intra-abdominal abscess and enterocutaneous fistula formation, have been well documented following pancreas transplantation. Although uncommon, these complications remain particularly difficult to manage and frequently mandate surgical re-exploration. In this manuscript, we will review three cases of enterocutaneous fistula in pancreas transplant recipients managed nonoperatively with percutaneous drainage and subsequent occlusion of the tract with fibrin sealant.

Internal Hernia after Pancreas Transplantation with Enteric Drainage: An Unusual Cause of Small Bowel Obstruction

BACKGROUND

Although complications involving leaking at the enteric anastomosis site, graft thrombosis, and intraabdominal abscess formation have been well documented after pancreas transplantation, the occurrence of small bowel obstruction in this setting has received scant attention. Although uncommon, intestinal obstruction after pancreas transplantation may have atypical etiologies. In this article, we will review three unusual cases of intestinal obstruction in pancreas transplant recipients. The value of computed tomographic (CT) enteroclysis in equivocal situations in the diagnosis of the obstruction is emphasized.

METHODS

In this study, we reviewed the posttransplant course of all pancreas transplants performed between July 1, 2002 and June 1, 2004. We specifically focused on all patients that required reexploration for suspected small bowel obstruction at any time after transplantation.

RESULTS

A total of 65 pancreas transplants were performed between July 1, 2002 and June 1, 2004. Pancreas graft survival was 97%, and patient survival was 98.5%. Five (7.7%) patients presented with mechanical small bowel obstruction, three of which were secondary to internal herniation of small intestine through a defect posterior to the pancreas allograft. All patients recovered well postsurgically.

DISCUSSION

Small bowel obstruction is an uncommon complication after pancreas transplantation. CT enteroclysis in the evaluation of small bowel obstruction may assist the patient care decision-making process by providing information on the location and severity of the obstruction in the clinical situation where conventional abdominal CT and radiography are equivocal. Prompt detection of small bowel obstruction with early surgical intervention can minimize complications and preserve allograft function.

A technique for retroperitoneal pancreas transplantation with portal-enteric drainage

BACKGROUND

Pancreas transplantation (PTx) with portal-enteric drainage (PED) has been associated with difficulties in respect to arterial anastomosis and graft accessibility for percutaneous biopsy. We describe a new technique that circumvents these difficulties.

METHODS

Between April 2001 and April 2004, a total of 113 recipients were scheduled for PTx with PED. The superior mesenteric vein was approached from the right retroperitoneal aspect instead of from the anterior transmesenteric route. The pancreas graft was eventually placed in the right retroperitoneal space, being covered by the ascending colon and its mesentery.

RESULTS

One hundred ten (97.3%) PTx were performed as planned. Systemic venous effluent was preferred in three patients because of incidental diagnosis of liver cirrhosis during surgery (n=1) and severe obesity (body mass index>35 kg/m2) (n=2). The Y iliac artery graft was kept as short as possible, and arterial anastomosis was always performed with ease. After a mean follow-up period of 21.2+/-19.9 months, the relaparotomy rate was 13.6%. No patient died after repeat surgery, and none required multiple relaparotomies. Overall, 10 grafts were lost because of acute rejection (n=3), chronic rejection (n=2), venous thrombosis (n=2), recipient death (n=2), and late (6-month) arterial thrombosis (n=1). One-year patient and graft survival were 98.1% and 90.7%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data confirm that PTx with PED is not associated with an increased risk. The technique described has distinctive technical advantages and should be included in the repertoire of PTx.

The transplant recipient for nontransplant surgery

The transplant recipient has traded a life-threatening illness for a chronically immunosuppressed state. Subsequent anesthetic management for non-transplant surgical procedures may be challenging. The anesthesia provider must be aware of the degree of post-transplant organ dysfunction and alter anesthesia techniques accordingly. This article reviews the anesthetic concerns for patients who have undergone a variety of organ transplants.

Resultados do transplante pancreático em um centro brasileiro

OBJETIVO: O transplante de pâncreas (TP) é atualmente o único tratamento disponível capaz de estabelecer estado euglicêmico permanente e de independência da insulina nos portadores de Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1. Neste estudo são apresentados os resultados do TP realizados em um centro paranaense. MÉTODO: De janeiro de 2001 até abril de 2003, foram realizados 24 transplantes de pâncreas-rim simultâneos (TPRS), e um Transplante de Pâncreas Isolado (TPI) no Hospital e Maternidade Angelina Caron. RESULTADOS: No seguimento de 8,2 meses (1-27), a taxa de sucesso para pâncreas e rim foi de 74 %. A sobrevida dos pacientes foi de 76 %. A principal causa de insucesso foi trombose pancreática em três casos (12%) e renal em dois (8%). Não ocorreu nenhum episódio de rejeição. Todos os doentes com enxertos funcionantes apresentam-se normoglicêmicos sem necessidade de insulina. CONCLUSÕES: O transplante simultâneo de rim e pâncreas éterapêutica com alto índice de sucesso para pacientes diabéticos com insuficiência renal terminal.

Hypoglycaemia after pancreas transplantation: usefulness of a continuous glucose monitoring system

BACKGROUND

After pancreas transplantation (PTx) some patients report occasional symptoms of hypoglycaemia and at times, serious hypoglycaemia. Continuous blood glucose monitoring (CBGM) allows determination of the daily glucose profile and detection of unrecognized hypoglycaemia. The aims of our study were to determine the incidence of hypoglycaemia in PTx and evaluate whether the use of CBGM helps to detect unrecognized nocturnal hypoglycaemia.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We studied 12 patients (six males) with normal functioning PTx and kidney transplantation for more than 3 yr, with systemic drainage of endocrine secretion and stable immunosuppression. A 24-h CBGM using a microdialysis technique (GlucoDay, A. Menarini Diagnostics, Florence, Italy) was performed in all the patients.

RESULTS

Three patients had asymptomatic recorded glucose levels below 3.3 nmol/L during the nocturnal period (01:00-07:00 hours) with the glucose levels during these episodes being 2.6, 2.5 and 2.5 nmol/L, and the duration of nocturnal hypoglycaemia being 27, 62 and 93 min, respectively, rising spontaneously without intervention. Patients with hypoglycaemia presented lower glycosylated haemoglobin levels when compared with those not presenting hypoglycaemic episodes, although basal glucose and insulin levels and insulin antibody titres were similar. In one of the three patients presenting hypoglycaemia CBGM was re-evaluated after including an extra snack at bedtime, with subsequent normalization of the blood glucose profile being observed.

CONCLUSION

Unrecognized nocturnal hypoglycaemia is relatively frequent in patients with PTx and 24-h CBMG may be useful to detect these episodes.

Value of donor swabs for intra-abdominal infection in simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND

Simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation (SPK) has a higher rate of surgical complications compared with other whole organ transplantations. Graft thrombosis and intra-abdominal infections are the most frequent causes for relaparotomy. We evaluated risk factors for abdominal infections after SPK, with emphasis on the value of the routinely taken intraoperative swabs.

METHODS

Between June 1994 and December 2000, 177 SPK were performed. Immunosuppression consisted of antithymocyte globulin induction and triple-drug maintenance therapy. Routine swabs were taken from the graft perfusion solutions, from the donors' duodenum, and from the recipients' bladder and jejunum (in case of enteric drainage).

RESULTS

A total of 19 (10.7%) of 177 patients underwent 41 relaparotomies as a result of intra-abdominal infections. Positive microbial results from any donor site and positive duodenal swabs were significant risk factors for intra-abdominal infections after SPK (P=0.01, P=0.02). There was a significantly higher incidence of abdominal infections when Candida was found in the donor duodenal swab (P=0.0048). Patient survival was significantly lower in cases with abdominal infection (P=0.02). Survival rates of patients with and without abdominal infection were 89.5% and 97.4% at 1 year and 72.3% and 92.8% at 5 years, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study confirm that abdominal infections significantly reduce patient survival and thus jeopardize the success of SPK. Positive donor duodenal swabs have been revealed to be a significant risk factor for a subsequent intra-abdominal infection, especially when Candida was found.

Treatment and outcome of pancreatic venous graft thrombosis after kidney--pancreas transplantation

BACKGROUND

Pancreas venous graft thrombosis after transplantation is the main non-immunological cause of graft failure and usually results in pancreatectomy. Duplex Doppler ultrasonography is the primary imaging technique for monitoring vascular patency after pancreas transplantation. This study reports the results of rescue treatments for pancreas graft thrombosis after simultaneous pancreas--kidney transplantation.

METHODS

One hundred and ninety-six patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus received a simultaneous pancreas--kidney transplantation. Venous graft thrombosis was diagnosed in 25 of these patients based on Doppler ultrasonographic findings.

RESULTS

Total venous graft thrombosis was diagnosed in 20 symptomatic patients, of whom 14 required graft pancreatectomy. Surgical thrombectomy was attempted in six patients with preserved arterial supply and was successful in four. Partial venous graft thrombosis was diagnosed in five asymptomatic patients; one also had partial splenic artery thrombosis. Rescue graft procedures included systemic anticoagulation (one patient), arterial thrombolysis (one) and venous thrombolysis and/or mechanical venous thrombectomy (four episodes in three patients). Graft rescue was achieved in three patients treated by venous thrombolysis/thrombectomy.

CONCLUSION

Doppler ultrasonography allows the appropriate selection of rescue treatment based on the findings of total or partial thrombosis.

Urologic aspects of kidney-pancreas transplantation

The population of pancreas transplant recipients is growing steadily, and urologists most likely will be confronted with their unique anatomy and metabolic complications. The principles of diagnosis and management of these patients can be applied to other transplant recipients (e.g., heart, lung, and liver) who also are maintained on life-long immunosuppression and in whom urologic pathology develops commensurate with the incidence in the general population.

Pseudoaneurysm of the superior mesenteric artery after pancreas transplantation treated by endovascular stenting

Pseudoaneurysm after pancreas transplantation can have serious consequences, including rupture, hemorrhage, and graft loss. We describe a 38-year-old patient who presented with a pseudoaneurysm of the donor superior mesenteric artery 1 month after pancreas transplantation. Selective arteriography was performed and the lesion was repaired with endovascular placement of a 28-mm covered stent. Laparotomy was avoided. The pancreatic graft was continuing to function well 9 months later. As far as we know, this minimally invasive approach was not previously reported. According to published series, pseudoaneurysms often occur secondary to infection and require operative intervention necessitating graft pancreatectomy. Patients can present with serious symptoms including hypotension and shock. Therefore, it is important to detect pseudoaneurysm in a timely manner. Computed tomography and Doppler ultrasound are important diagnostic tools in this regard. We demonstrated the utility of endovascular stenting in the treatment of pseudoaneurysm after pancreas transplantation. When used in a timely manner in well selected patients, endovascular stenting can abrogate the need for operative intervention and its attendant morbidity.

Pancreas transplantation: the histologic morphology of graft loss and clinical correlations

BACKGROUND

Graft losses due to leaks, bleeding, thrombosis, infections, and early pancreatitis are grouped together under the category of technical failure. Among these complications, massive vascular thrombosis continues to be the most important cause of early graft loss due to technical failure. Pathological evaluation of most allografts lost early in the posttransplantation period shows vascular thrombosis with associated proportional parenchymal necrosis. The morphological findings in allografts that are considered to be lost due to technical failure has not been systematically addressed. In particular, the role of acute rejection in early graft loss has not been well studied.

METHODS

Seventy-four consecutive pancreas graft pancreatectomies were studied histologically to evaluate for thrombosis (recent versus organized), type of vessel involved by thrombosis (arteries, veins, or both), acute rejection grade, chronic rejection grade, endotheliitis, transplant arteritis, coagulation necrosis, acute pancreatitis, presence of infectious organisms, transplant (obliterative) arteriopathy, neoplasia, relative proportions of alpha and beta islet cells, and immunoglobulin and complement deposition. The histological findings were correlated with donor and recipient data as well as clinical presentation.

RESULTS

In 23 out of 39 grafts lost in the first 4 weeks posttransplantation, the only pathological changes found were vascular thrombosis and bland ischemic parenchymal necrosis. In these cases, no underlying vascular pathology or any other specific histological change was identified. Most of these grafts (78%) were lost in less than 48 hr and all in the first 2 weeks posttransplantation. Massive vascular thrombosis occurring in an otherwise histologically normal pancreas was the most common cause of graft loss in the first 4 weeks posttransplantation (59%). In most of the remaining cases (33%), although the clinical presentation suggested technical failure, there was clear histological evidence that the massive thrombosis resulted from vascular injury due to immune damage (acute and hyperacute rejection). Increased incidence of early graft thrombosis was seen in grafts from older donors and longer cold ischemia times. After the first month posttransplantation, graft pancreatectomies revealed a wider variety of pathological processes that included severe acute rejection, combined acute and chronic rejection, chronic rejection, and infections. Acute and chronic vascular thrombosis in large and small vessels was commonly seen at all times posttransplantation; chronic, organized thrombosis was strongly associated with chronic rejection.

CONCLUSIONS

(a) Early acute thrombosis occurring in a histologically normal pancreas defines a true technical failure. This study showed that acute rejection leading to massive thrombosis, which clinically simulates technical failure, results in a significant proportion of early graft losses. (b) Systematic histological evaluation of failed grafts is absolutely necessary for the accurate classification of the cause of graft loss. (c) There is morphological evidence that chronically ongoing thrombosis is an important, common, contributing factor for late graft loss.

Pseudoaneurysm of the Y-graft/iliac artery anastomosis following pancreas transplantation: a case report and review of the literature

Transplant-related aneurysms are an unusual complication following pancreas transplantation. We present a case of a pseudoaneurysm developing in a recipient 6 months after bladder-drained pancreas transplantation. The pseudoaneurysm was incidentally found during ultrasonographic evaluation in preparation for a pancreas biopsy. Angiography demonstrated that the origin of the pseudoaneurysm was located near the base of the Y-graft/iliac artery anastomosis. Surgical repair was performed using standard vascular techniques. The patient subsequently recovered without loss of graft exocrine or endocrine function. Review of the literature revealed that aneurysms of various types associated with pancreas transplantation have a high incidence of graft loss and contribute significantly to patient morbidity. However, with prompt diagnostic and surgical management, non-infected pseudoaneurysms can be repaired without loss of pancreatic function.

Embolization of a mesenteric arteriovenous fistula following pancreatic allograft: the steal effect

The first pancreatic transplant was performed in 1966 by Kelly and Lillehei at the University of Minnesota (1, 2). Nearly 30 years later, Ozaki et al., published the first occurrence of an arteriovenous fistula (AVF) in a transplanted allograft bundle (3). From its early days as a radical and experimental procedure in the treatment of insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, this operation has progressed to become routine in many major medical centers. However, the incidence of technical complications remains relatively high, ranging from 10 to 40% (1). The list of potential complications includes allograft pancreatitis, vascular thrombosis, hemorrhage, pseudoaneurysm formation, anastomotic leaks, intra-abdominal infections, and, al. though rare, AVF. Lowell et al., in 1993, reported this last complication in 3 of 90 consecutive pancreatic recipients (4). These same authors promoted the theory that AVF formation was directly related to procurement technique: a nonspecific "blind ligation" of mesenteric vessels along the inferior pancreatic border. However, this approach continues to be used commonly. We have identified the occurrence of an allograft superior mesenteric artery-superior mesenteric vein (SMA-SMV) AVF in a pancreas-after-kidney (PAK) transplant recipient.

Decreased surgical risks of pancreas transplantation in the modern era

OBJECTIVE

To document the decreased incidence of surgical complications after pancreas transplantation in recent times.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Compared with other abdominal transplants, pancreas transplants have historically had the highest incidence of surgical complications. However, over the past few years, the authors have noted a significant decrease in the incidence of surgical complications.

METHODS

The authors studied the incidence of early (<3 months after transplant) surgical complications (e.g., relaparotomy, thrombosis, infections, leaks) after 580 pancreas transplants performed during a 12-year period. Patients were analyzed and compared in two time groups: era 1 (June 1, 1985, to April 30, 1994, n = 367) and era 2 (May 1, 1994, to June 30, 1997, n = 213).

RESULTS

Overall, surgical complications were significantly reduced in era 2 compared with era 1. The relaparotomy rate decreased from 32.4% in era 1 to 18.8% in era 2. Significant risk factors for early relaparotomy were donor age older than 40 years and recipient obesity. Recipients with relaparotomy had significantly lower graft survival rates than those without relaparotomy, but patient survival rates were not significantly different. A major factor contributing to the lower relaparotomy rate in era 2 was a significant decrease in the incidence of graft thrombosis; the authors believe this lower incidence is due to the routine use of postoperative low-dose intravenous heparin and acetylsalicylic acid. The incidence of bleeding requiring relaparotomy did not differ between the two eras. Older donor age was the most significant risk factor for graft thrombosis. The incidence of intraabdominal infections significantly decreased between the two eras; this decrease may be due to improved prophylaxis regimens in the first postoperative week.

CONCLUSIONS

Although a retrospective study has its limits, the results of this study, the largest single-center experience to date, show a significant decrease in the surgical risk associated with pancreas transplants. Reasons for this decrease are identification of donor and recipient risk factors, better prophylaxis regimens, refinements in surgical technique, and improved immunosuppressive regimens. These improved results suggest that more widespread application of pancreas transplantation is warranted.

Allograft pancreatectomy after pancreas transplantation with systemic-bladder versus portal-enteric drainage

From 1989 to 1997, we performed 159 pancreas transplantations (PTXs), including 117 simultaneous kidney PTX (SKPT), 25 PTXs alone (PTA), and 17 sequential PTXs after kidney transplantations (PAKT). A total of 73 PTXs were performed with systemic-bladder (S-B) and 86 with portal-enteric (P-E) drainage. The need for allograft pancreatectomy (PCTY) may be considered as an index of technical morbidity after PTX. A total of 37 PCTYs (23%) were performed at a mean of 4.7 months after PTX. Twenty-seven PCTYs were performed within 1 month, 30 (81%) within 3 months, and the remaining seven more than 6 months after PTX. The incidence of PCTY did not differ according to type of transplantation: simultaneous kidney PTX (SKPT) (23%), PTA (24%), and PAKT (23.5%). Indications for PCTY were thrombosis (23), rejection (9), infection (3), and pancreatitis (2). During the study, a total of 70 pancreas grafts were lost, with PCTY performed in 37 (53%). PCTY was directly related to the timing of graft loss; 77% of grafts lost within 3 months of PTX required PCTY, while 25% of grafts lost after 3 months resulted in PCTY (p < 0.01). The incidence of graft failure resulting in PCTY was similar according to type of transplantation: SKPT (55%), PTA (46%), and PAKT (50%). The incidence of PCTY was also similar according to technique of transplantation: 26% S-B versus 21% P-E, p = NS. However, the incidence of graft failure resulting in PCTY was higher in P-E (69%) versus S-B (43%) (p < 0.05) PTX recipients. Patient and kidney graft survival and pancreas retransplant graft survival rates were higher in PTX recipients with P-E drainage.

CONCLUSIONS

PCTY is performed in over half of cases of pancreas allograft loss and is directly related to the timing and cause of graft loss. The incidence of PCTY is neither related to the type nor technique of PTX. The lower overall incidence of graft loss after PTX with P-E drainage is offset by a higher incidence of PCTY in these grafts that fail. These results suggest that whole-organ PTX with P-E drainage does not place the patient at an increased risk for PCTY and does not preclude successful pancreas retransplantation.

Surgical complications after pancreas transplantation with portal-enteric drainage

BACKGROUND

Despite recent advances, surgical complications remain an important source of morbidity after pancreas transplantation (PTX). Several previous studies have delineated the surgical complications after PTX with systemic-bladder (S-B) drainage, but data are limited regarding the incidence and outcomes of surgical complications after PTX with portal-enteric (P-E) drainage.

STUDY DESIGN

We retrospectively studied surgical complications after 83 vascularized PTXs with P-E drainage in 79 patients (65 simultaneous kidney-PTXs [SKPT] and 18 solitary PTXs [SPT], 8 pancreas alone and 10 pancreas after kidney transplantation). Twelve (15%) were retransplants. A surgical complication was defined as the need for repeat laparotomy within the first 3 months after PTX.

RESULTS

A total of 53 surgical complications requiring repeat laparotomy occurred in 31 patients (37%). The incidence of surgical complications in SKPT and SPT was 38% and 33%, respectively. The most common indications for repeat laparotomy were: vascular thrombosis in 13% (SKPT 14% and SPT 11%), intraabdominal infection in 10% (SKPT 12% and SPT 0%), intraabdominal bleeding in 8% (SKPT 8% and SPT 11%), and duodenal allograft leak in 4% (SKPT 3% and SPT 6%). Patient survival rates at 1 and 3 years with versus without surgical complications were 84% and 80% versus 94% and 86%, respectively (p = NS). Pancreas graft survival rates at 1 and 3 years with versus without surgical complications were 48% and 44% versus 89% and 76%, respectively (p < 0.0001). The incidence of surgical complications was 45% in the first 42 P-E transplantations performed between 1990 and 1995, compared with 29% in the next 41 transplantations performed during 1996 and 1997 (p = NS). The mean number of repeat laparotomies per patient decreased from 1.2 in the former group to 0.5 in the latter group (p = NS). The incidence rates of vascular thrombosis, intraabdominal infection, and duodenal leak in the former and latter groups were 17% versus 10%, 12% versus 7%, and 2% versus 5%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical complications after PTX are common, and their incidence and outcomes with P-E drainage are similar to those with S-B drainage. The complication rate does not vary according to the type of transplant (SKPT versus SPT). Increasing experience with P-E drainage results in a decreased incidence of surgical complications.

Pseudoaneurysm of the superior mesenteric artery with an arteriovenous fistula after simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation

Vascular complications remain a significant source of morbidity after pancreatic transplantation. We describe a pseudoaneurysm of the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) with an arteriovenous fistula (AVF) involving the SMA and the superior mesenteric vein (SMV) discovered and treated surgically in the second week after kidney pancreas transplantation. The patient experienced pain over the graft, and subsequent radionuclide and Doppler ultrasound scan were suggestive of a pseudoaneurysm in the head of the pancreas. Awaiting confirmatory angiography, the patient became hypotensive and after resuscitation, underwent emergency surgery when a pseudoaneurysm was found in the head of the pancreas. After looping the proximal and distal recipient iliac artery and base of the donor Y vascular graft, the AVF was separated and ligated. The SMV was dissected off the pancreatic head and repaired over a tamponading intraluminal Foley catheter. Graft function was preserved. Based on this experience, an AVF with or without a pseudoaneurysm in the pancreas allograft should be corrected as soon it is suspected.

Evolution in pancreas transplantation techniques: simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation using portal-enteric drainage without antilymphocyte induction

OBJECTIVE

To report initial experience with the combination of a novel technique of portal-enteric pancreas transplantation with newer immunosuppressive strategies that eliminate antilymphocyte induction therapy.

BACKGROUND

A new surgical technique of pancreas transplantation has been developed with portal venous delivery of insulin and enteric drainage of the exocrine secretions (portal-enteric). The introduction of potent immunosuppressive agents may allow simultaneous kidney and pancreas transplants (SKPT) to be performed without antilymphocyte induction.

METHODS

From September 1996 to November 1998, the authors performed 28 primary SKPTs with portal-enteric drainage and no antilymphocyte induction. All patients received triple immunosuppression with tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and steroids. The study group had a mean age of 38 years and a mean preoperative duration of diabetes of 25 years. Four patients (14%) had prior kidney transplants.

RESULTS

All patients had immediate renal allograft function. Actual patient, kidney, and pancreas graft survival rates were 86%, 82%, and 82%, respectively, after a mean follow-up of 12 months. Four patients died, three as a result of cardiac events unrelated to SKPT. Five kidney and five pancreas grafts were lost, including five deaths with function and three cases of chronic rejection. The mean length of stay and total charges for the initial hospital stay were 12.5 days and $99,517. The mean number of readmissions was 2.9, and 10 patients (36%) had no readmissions. Six patients (21 %) developed acute rejection, with five (18%) receiving antilymphocyte therapy. Seven patients (25%) underwent relaparotomy, including two (7%) for intraabdominal infection. Nine patients (32%) had major infections, including three (11%) with cytomegaloviral infection. Of the 24 surviving patients, 22 (92%) are both dialysis- and insulin-free.

CONCLUSION

These preliminary results suggest that SKPT with portal-enteric drainage without antilymphocyte induction can be performed with excellent outcomes.

Pancreas transplantation

Although intensified insulin therapy regimens enable normalization of blood glucose levels and related metabolic parameters, these regimens are associated with an increased incidence of hypoglycemic episodes. Pancreas transplantation has achieved the goal of providing insulin independence with stable and continuous normoglycemia. But because of the associated morbidity and mortality and the need for life-long immunosuppression after transplant, it is difficult to justify pancreas transplantation in diabetic patients at a pre-uremic stage. Pancreas transplantation is therefore performed in conjugation with renal transplantation. The majority of renal transplant centers, however, have been reluctant to perform simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation in insulin-dependent uremic patients because of the additional risks associated with pancreas transplantation. More recently, refinements in surgical technique, introduction of new immunosuppressive agents, and better selection of transplant candidates have contributed to improved survival. Today, combined pancreas-kidney transplantation is an accepted treatment for carefully selected patients with insulin dependent diabetes and end-stage renal disease and in a small group of patients with uncontrolled severe metabolic problems. The effect of a euglycemic state after pancreas transplantation on the progression of micro- and macroangiopathy remains to be proved, although recently there is evidence to suggest that some end-organ lesions may be halted or even ameliorated. Further improvement in anti-rejection strategies may achieve better long-term graft survival and provide the incentive to perform pancreas transplantation at an earlier stage, before severe secondary complications of diabetes develop.

Renal pedicle torsion after simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation

BACKGROUND

Simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation has become a recognized therapy for type I diabetes mellitus patients with diabetic nephropathy, neuropathy, and retinopathy. In the vast majority of these procedures, both grafts are placed intraperitoneally, which reduces posttransplant morbidity. Recently, in some of our recipients, we noted renal dysfunction related to complications of the renal pedicle. Our objectives in this study were to identify the cause of this renal dysfunction and to prevent its occurrence in future recipients.

STUDY DESIGN

We undertook a retrospective chart review of simultaneous kidney-pancreas recipients who experienced renal dysfunction related to renal pedicle complications.

RESULTS

We found four recipients with renal dysfunction related to renal pedicle torsion, diagnosed by serial ultrasound scans and kidney graft biopsies. Early diagnosis allowed salvage of three kidney grafts, but one was lost after late diagnosis.

CONCLUSIONS

A high level of suspicion is needed to diagnose renal pedicle torsion. If simultaneous kidney-pancreas recipients have recurrent renal dysfunction, and rejection has been excluded, serial ultrasound scans with color flow Doppler examinations are needed. Once the diagnosis is made, a nephropexy to the anterior abdominal wall is indicated to prevent further torsion and save the kidney graft. We recommend prophylactic nephropexy of left renal grafts if the renal pedicle is > or = 5 cm long and if there is a 2 cm or more discrepancy between the length of the artery and the vein.

Surgical complications requiring early relaparotomy after pancreas transplantation: a multivariate risk factor and economic impact analysis of the cyclosporine era

OBJECTIVES

To study significant surgical complications requiring early (< or = 3 months posttransplant) relaparotomy (relap) after pancreas transplants, and to develop clinically relevant surgical and peritransplant decision-making guidelines for preventing and managing such complications.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Pancreas grafts are still associated with the highest surgical complication rate of all routinely transplanted solid organs. However, the impact of surgical complications on morbidity, hospital costs, and graft and patient survival rates has not been analyzed in detail to date.

METHODS

We retrospectively studied surgical complications requiring relap in 441 consecutive cadaver, bladder-drained pancreas transplants (54% simultaneous pancreas and kidney [SPK]; 22% pancreas after kidney [PAK]; 24% pancreas transplant alone [PTA]; 37% retransplant). Outcome and hospital charges were analyzed separately for recipients with versus without reoperation.

RESULTS

The overall relap rate was 32% (SPK, 36%; PAK, 25%; PTA, 16%; p = 0.04). The most common causes were intraabdominal infection and graft pancreatitis (38%), pancreas graft thrombosis (27%), and anastomotic leak (15%). Perioperative relap mortality was 9%; transplant pancreatectomy was necessary in 57% of all recipients with one or more relaps. The pancreas graft was lost in 80% of recipients with versus 41% without relap (p < 0.0001). Patient survival rates were significantly lower (p < 0.05) for recipients with versus without relap. By multivariate analysis, significant risk factors for graft loss included older donor age (SPK, PAK), retransplant (PAK), relap for infection (SPK, PAK), and relap for leak or bleeding (PAK). For death, risk factors included older recipient age (SPK, PAK),retransplant (SPK, PAK), relap for thrombosis (PAK), relap for infection or leak (SPK), and relap for bleeding (PTA).

CONCLUSIONS

Posttransplant surgical complications requiring relap were frequent, resulted in a high rate of pancreas (SPK, PAK, PTA) and kidney (SPK, PAK) graft loss, and had a major economic impact (p = 0.0001). Complications were associated with substantial perioperative mortality and decreased patient survival rates. The focus must therefore shift from graft salvage to preservation of the recipient's life once a pancreas graft-related complication requiring relap occurs. Thus, the threshold for pancreatectomy should be low. In this context, acceptance of older donors and recipients must be reconsidered.

A prospective randomized clinical trial of perioperative treatment with octreotide in pancreas transplantation

BACKGROUND

Technical failures continue to plague clinical pancreas transplantation. The somastatin analogue octreotide has been shown able to decrease morbidity after pancreatic resection. We studied the effect of perioperative treatment with octreotide on technical complications after pancreas transplant.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Seventeen recipients of bladder-drained transplant were randomized to receive either octreotide, 100 microg TID SQ for 5 days after transplant (n = 10) or no additional treatment (n = 7). We compared the two groups in terms of patient and graft survival and incidence of graft pancreatitis, intra-abdominal infections, and anastomotic leaks.

RESULTS

In the untreated group, 1 patient developed a bladder leak and 2 had intra-abdominal infections, while no complications occurred in the octreotide-treated patients (P = 0.05). Six-month patient and pancreas survival was 100% and 90%, respectively, in octreotide-treated patients versus 86% and 86% in the control group (P = NS).

CONCLUSION

Perioperative treatment with octreotide seems able to reduce the incidence of technical complications after pancreas transplantation.

The surgical risk of pancreas transplantation in the cyclosporine era: an overview

BACKGROUND

Pancreas transplants are still associated with the highest surgical complication rate of all routinely performed solid organ transplants. To date, the impact of serious surgical complications in the cyclosporine era on perioperative patient morbidity, graft and patient survival, and hospital costs has not been analyzed in detail.

STUDY DESIGN

We retrospectively studied surgical complications after 445 consecutive pancreas transplants (45% simultaneous pancreas-kidney [SPK], 24% pancreas after kidney [PAK], and 31% pancreas transplant alone [PTA]). Of these, 80% were primary transplants, 20% were retransplants. Cadaver donors were used in 92%, living related donors in 8%. To develop guidelines for their prevention and management, we studied the impact of significant surgical complications (intra-abdominal infections, vascular graft thrombosis, and anastomotic leak) requiring relaparotomy on graft and patient survival.

RESULTS

Relaparotomy was required after 32% of all pancreas transplants (SPK: 36%, PAK: 25%, PTA: 16% [p = 0.04]). Perioperative mortality was 9%. Graft and patient survival rates were significantly lower for recipients with (versus without) relaparotomy. The most common procedures were drainage of intra-abdominal abscess with graft necrosectomy (50% of all relaparotomies) and transplant pancreatectomy (34%). The most common causes of relaparotomy were intra-abdominal infection, vascular graft thrombosis, and anastomotic leak. Intra-abdominal infection occurred in 20% (SPK: 18%, PAK: 24%, PTA: 20% [p = NS]). The rate was significantly higher for living related donor (42%) versus cadaver donor (18%) recipients and for those with enteric-drained (39%) versus bladder-drained (18%) transplants. Graft and patient survival rates were significantly lower for recipients with (versus without) intra-abdominal infection. Outcome was better after bacterial (versus fungal) infections. For SPK recipients, those not on dialysis before the transplant had significantly higher graft survival than those on dialysis. Vascular graft thrombosis occurred in 12% of all recipients. The rate was significantly higher for PAK (21%) than for PTA (10%) and SPK (9%) recipients. It was significantly lower for recipients of grafts with donor iliac Y-graft reconstruction (versus all other types of arterial reconstruction) and with right-sided (versus left-sided) graft placement. Of note, patient survival was not different for recipients with versus without vascular graft thrombosis. The incidence of anastomotic or duodenal stump leaks was 10%; of these recipients, 70% required relaparotomy. Patient and graft survival rates were no different for recipients with versus without leaks.

CONCLUSIONS

Serious surgical complications occurred in 35% of pancreas recipients and had a significant impact on patient and graft survival. Based on multivariate risk factor analyses, we recommend the following: donors over 45 years and those dying of cerebrocardiovascular disease should not be used; recipients over 45 years and those with a history of cardiac disease should be considered for a kidney transplant alone (KTA); surgical technique for graft procurement, preparation, and implantation should be meticulous; right-sided implantation and arterial Y-graft reconstruction should be performed when possible, since they had the highest success rates; when complications require relaparotomy, the focus must switch from graft salvage to life preservation; and the threshold for pancreatectomy should be low. Diagnosis should be timely, and treatment and relaparotomy expeditious. These cornerstones of success should help decrease the risk of surgical complications and mortality after pancreas transplants.