Introducer insertion of mini-thoracostomy tubes

Spontaneous pneumothorax: A retrospective study of twenty-five patients and literature review

We present a retrospective study of 25 patients with spontaneous pneumothorax (three current), comprising 16 Saudis (nine males and seven females) and nine non-Saudis (eight males and one female), seen at the Asir Central Hospital, Abha, over a period of 45 months. Almost one-third of the patients (9/25) had no underlying cause discernible by our investigational facilities (chest x-ray, ultrasonography, computed tomographic scan, and flexible bronchofiberscopy). Underlying pneumonia (three patients), pulmonary tuberculosis (two patients), lung abscess (one patient), and congenital bullae (one patient) constituted the etiology in another third of the spontaneous pneumothorax patients. Other underlying pulmonary diseases precipitating spontaneous pneumothorax in the group included pulmonary fibrosis, metastatic mesothelioma, and immunosuppression in a medulloblastoma patient undergoing chemotherapy with the development of chickenpox. Closed thoracostomy tube drainage was the only method of treatment in 20 out of the 25 patients, with three failures of closed thoracostomy tube drainage needing thoracotomy and resection of blebs/bullae. The only complication was empyema in two of the patients. Two patients were successfully treated conservatively with observation alone.

Iatrogenic tension pneumothorax complicating outpatient Heimlich valve chest drainage

Use of new technology makes possible the outpatient management of conditions previously requiring inpatient treatment. With increased use of such modalities comes a greater chance that the emergency physician will encounter patients with device-related complications. We report a case of such a complication, a tension pneumothorax presenting to the emergency department following misguided manipulation of a modified Heimlich chest drainage system. It is recommended that physicians opting to utilize such out-patient technology refrain from improvised modifications that may be unfamiliar to subsequent providers.

Tension Pneumothorax: Etiology, Diagnosis, Pathophysiology, and Management

The normally air-free pleural cavity exists at subatmospheric pressure to promote pleural apposition and proper lung excursion. Owing to its unique bilayer structure, air introduced into this space either from within the thoracic cavity or from an extrathoracic source causes pleural separation and simple pneumothorax (PTX). Most simple pneumothoracies of a small or static volume in healthy patients do not appreciably impair cardiopulmonary function despite variable collapse of the lung. If increasing pressure develops within this pleural air collection, however, a cascade of pathophysiological changes can result from altered anatomical positions of heart, lung, and great vessels. The development of increasing pressure within the pleural space, with resultant ipsilateral lung collapse and hemithoracic expansion into the mediastinum and the contralateral lung, is termed tension pneumothorax (TPTX). The exact incidence of TPTX is unknown, but it is reported in up to 2 to 3% of all pneumothoracies. Certain medical and surgical disease states—many found within the critical care environment—place patients at higher risk for development of TPTX and also limit physiological tolerance to TPTX once it occurs. Although physical examination and chest radiography generally confirm the occurrence of TPTX, physiological monitoring may herald the development of increasing intrapleural pressure. Expeditious recognition and pleural decompression are necessary to prevent the untoward hemodynamic and respiratory consequences of TPTX. Significant morbidity and mortality may arise from TPTX if treatment is unduly delayed, particularly in mechanically ventilated patients.

Chest tubes: indications, placement, management, and complications

Use of tube thoracostomy in intensive care units for evacuation of air or fluid from the pleural space has become commonplace. In addition to recognition of pathological states necessitating chest tube insertion, intensivists are frequently involved in placement, maintenance, troubleshooting, and discontinuation of chest tubes. Numerous advances have permitted safe use of tube thoracostomy for treatment of spontaneous or iatrogenic pneumothoracies and hydrothoracies following cardiothoracic surgery or trauma, or for drainage of pus, bile, or chylous effusions. We review current indications for chest tube placement, insertion techniques, and available equipment, including drainage systems. Guidelines for maintenance and discontinuation are also discussed. As with any surgical procedure, complications may arise. Appropriate training and competence in usage may reduce the incidence of complications.

Pneumothorax: treatment by small-lumen catheter aspiration

To assess the efficacy of simple aspiration as a treatment for pneumothorax, 40 consecutive pneumothoraces (28 spontaneous, 12 iatrogenic, all estimated at greater than or equal to 20% collapse on visual inspection of the chest X-ray) in 38 symptomatic patients were treated initially by small-lumen catheter (SLC) aspiration. SLC aspiration avoided the need for large-lumen intercostal catheter (LIC) underwater drainage in 28 cases (70%)--20 of 28 spontaneous and eight of 12 iatrogenic pneumothoraces. Outcome was not predicted by clinical variables or pneumothorax size, whereas an initial aspirate volume of less than or equal to 4 L (n = 33) was predictable of success in 28 cases (85%). Minor local subcutaneous emphysema and vasovagal reactions were encountered infrequently but with similar frequency to LIC drainage. No episodes of re-expansion pulmonary oedema occurred. The results confirm previous reports of the efficacy of simple aspiration as a treatment for spontaneous or iatrogenic pneumothorax. Initial treatment by SLC aspiration is recommended for all but life-threatening presentations of pneumothorax. Although not encountered in this study, the potential risk of re-expansion pulmonary oedema suggests that patients should be observed closely for four hours after aspiration.