Bacteriuria in appendicitis

Pyelonephritis of an ectopic right kidney pretending as acute appendicitis: An unusual case

Introduction

Acute appendicitis is a common condition presenting in emergency department. A patient presenting with pain associated with fever, and tenderness in the right iliac fossa will be suspected to have Acute Appendicitis. However a variety of other clinical conditions may have similar features and may be required to be excluded. Acute pyelonephritis in an ectopic right kidney is a rare clinical condition which may mimic Acute Appendicitis.

Case presentation

We present a middle-age male with complaints of pain in the right lower quadrant of the abdomen with high grade fever for one week. Clinical suspicion and initial ultrasonography (USG) of abdomen supported the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. The patient was initially managed conservatively and later non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT) scan was done that revealed right ectopic kidney with acute pyelonephritis. The appendix was within normal limits on NCCT scan.

Discussion

Ectopic kidneys result from anomalies of ascend which can result in several complications depending upon its position. Acute appendicitis can also cause pyuria and may mimic urosepsis amounting to its close anatomical proximity to urinary bladder. An un-ascended ectopic kidney with pyelonephritis mimicking acute appendicitis is a rare occurrence. USG and CT scan are important tools in the differential diagnosis but however, USG is greatly operator dependent; CT scan provides excellent diagnostic accuracy.

Conclusion

This case report signifies importance of NCCT abdomen in accurate diagnosis of conditions featuring as right lower abdominal pain and fever. Also emphasizing significance of NCCT prior to any surgical intervention, if any conflict of diagnosis occurs.

•

Right lower abdomen pain and fever are most commonly attributed to acute appendicitis.

•

Cases are reported in past with co-existing pyelonephritis and appendicitis as well as pyelonephritis mimicking appendicitis.

•

Pyelonephritis in ectopic kidney and appendicitis are very hard to differentiate on basis of history and lab parameters.

•

NCCT abdomen can serve as augmented imaging modality in such cases with diagnostic dilemmas.

Mimicry of Appendicitis Symptomatology in Congenital Anomalies and Diseases of the Genitourinary System and Pregnancy

INTRODUCTION

Appendicitis is a prevailing cause of acute abdomen, but is often difficult to diagnose due to its wide range of symptoms, anatomical variations, and developmental abnormalities. Urological disorders of the genitourinary tract may be closely related to appendicitis due to the close proximity of the appendix to the genitourinary tract. This review provides a summary of the urological complications and simulations of appendicitis. Both typical and urological symptoms of appendicitis are discussed, as well as recommended diagnostic and treatment methods.

METHODS

Medline searches were conducted via PubMed in order to incorporate data from the recent and early literature.

RESULTS

Urological manifestations of appendicitis affect the adrenal glands, kidney, retroperitoneum, ureter, bladder, prostate, scrotum, and penis. Appendicitis in pregnancy is difficult to diagnose due to variations in appendiceal position and trimester-specific symptoms. Ultrasound, CT, and MRI are used in diagnosis of appendicitis and its complications. Treatment of appendicitis may be done via open appendectomy or laparoscopic appendectomy. In some cases, other surgeries are required to treat urological complications, though surgery may be avoided completely in other cases.

CONCLUSION

Clinical presentation and complications of appendicitis vary among patients, especially when the genitourinary tract is involved. Appendicitis may mimic urological disorders and vice versa. Awareness of differential diagnosis and proper diagnostic techniques is important in preventing delayed diagnosis and possible complications. MRI is recommended for diagnosis of pregnant patients. Ultrasound is preferred in patients exhibiting typical symptoms.

Unenhanced spiral CT for the assessment of renal colic. How does limiting the referral base affect the discovery of additional findings not related to urinary tract calculi?

The value of unenhanced spiral CT (UESCT) for investigating acute flank pain suggestive of urinary tract calculi is increasingly appreciated in the last few years. Recent studies have identified the advantages of UESCT in recognizing alternative findings within or outside the urinary tract. We sought to determine how narrowing the referral base for the UESCT would affect the discovery of potentially significant alternative findings in patients with acute flank pain suggestive of renal colic. Between January 1999 and December 1999, 425 patients, 271 (63.8%) men and 154 (36.2%) women who were 1-90 years old (mean 45.7 years old) with acute flank pain were studied with UESCT. CT studies were solely ordered by urologists, and only patients with intractable renal colic or patients that returned more than once to the emergency room with the complaint of acute flank pain were studied. A calculus within the ureter was diagnostic of an obstructive stone. Any other abnormality within the abdomen and pelvis was reported. A ureteral calculus was detected on 251 (59%) CT scans. Nineteen (4.5%) CT scans were consistent with recent excretion of a stone. In 112 (26.3%) CT scans, the cause for the patient's acute flank pain could not be explained. Forty-three (10.1%) alternative significant diagnoses that explain the patient's complaints were found. Nineteen (44%) were findings related to the urinary tract, and 24 (56%) were not related to the urinary tract. Ninety-seven (22.3%) additional findings not significant to the patient's current complaint were also reported. Even when narrowing the indications for the UESCT, about 10% of significant alternative findings to urinary stones were encountered. The variety of diagnoses found unexpectedly on the UESCT that alter a patient's management demonstrates the pivotal role of UESCT in triaging these patients rapidly towards optimal therapy. The UESCT can be used as a useful screening tool, sometimes revealing the exact pathology and sometimes directing the radiologist to the modality by which to continue.

A chance of misdiagnosis between acute appendicitis and renal colic

The symptoms of right-sided renal colic mimic sometimes acute appendicitis. A prospective comparative study of 188 patients with ureteral stone and 188 patients with acute appendicitis was performed to evaluate the features of differential diagnosis. Appendicitis caused more often nausea (81 vs 11%), fever and localized pain in the McBurney (97 vs 59%) than renal colic. The patients with ureteral stone had tenderness in 16% in the right lower quadrant. The mean values of C-reactive protein (41 mg/l) and blood leukocytes (14 x 10(9)/l) were elevated in appendicitis, but not in renal colic (14 mg/l and 10 x 10(9)/ l). Urinanalysis revealed red cells in 92% of ureteral stones compared with 26% in appendicitis. Only one of 188 patients with appendicitis was first misdiagnosed to have renal colic. A mistake of appendicitis for ureteral stone is clinically rare occurring only once or twice per year in the hospital where 700-800 emergency appendectomies are annually performed.

Management of the acute abdomen. A test of judgement

Most patients with abdominal pain do not need an operation, but identification of those who do is an important role for the primary care physician. A carefully performed physical examination in conjunction with selected laboratory tests usually establishes the general diagnosis and allows the physician to decide among management alternatives. These include early operation, observation, or further evaluation using special studies.