Carotid endarterectomy can be safely performed with acceptable mortality and morbidity in patients requiring coronary artery bypass grafts

Patients with Polyvascular Disease: A Very High-risk Group

Polyvascular disease (PolyvascDis) with atherosclerosis occurring in >2 vascular beds (coronary, carotid, aortic, visceral and/or peripheral arteries) is encountered in 15-30% of patients who experience greater rates of major adverse cardiovascular (CV) events. Every patient with multiple CV risk factors or presenting with CV disease in one arterial bed should be assessed for PolyvascDis clinically and noninvasively prior to invasive angiography. Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) can be readily diagnosed in routine practice by measuring the ankle-brachial index. Carotid disease can be diagnosed by duplex ultrasound showing % stenosis and/or presence of plaques. Coronary artery disease (CAD) can be screened by determining coronary artery calcium score using coronary computed tomography angiography; further, non-invasive testing includes exercise stress and/or myocardial perfusion imaging or dobutamine stress test, prior to coronary angiography. Abdominal ultrasound can reveal an abdominal aortic aneurysm. Computed tomography angiography will be needed in patients with suspected mesenteric ischemia to assess the mesenteric arteries. Patients with the acute coronary syndrome and concomitant other arterial diseases have more extensive CAD and poorer CV outcomes. Similarly, PolyvascDis in patients with carotid disease and/or other PAD is independently associated with an increased risk for all-cause and CV mortality during long-term follow-up. Treatment of patients with PolyvascDis should include aggressive management of all modifiable risk factors by lifestyle changes and drug therapy, with particular attention to patients who are commonly undertreated, such as those with PAD. Revascularization should be reserved for symptomatic vascular beds, using the least aggressive strategy in a multidisciplinary vascular team approach.

Early results of combined and staged coronary bypass and carotid endarterectomy in advanced age patients in single centre

Aim:

In present study, we aimed to compare the staged and combined surgery in patients with severe carotid stenosis and coronary atherosclerosis and detect the factors affecting mortality and morbidity.

Material and method:

Between 2004 and 2008, 120 patients with predominant ischemic heart disease were enrolled to study. Patients were divided into three groups on basis surgery procedure. Group 1 (n=40) includeed patients had coronary artery disease without carotid disease underwent coronary artery by-pass graft (CABG) operation. Group 2 (n=40): included patients underwent combined surgery procedure including CABG and carotid endarterectomy (CEA). Patients underwent staged CABG and CEA were enrolled to Group 3 (n=40). All patients were in advanced aged and were had the same risk factors atributable atherosclerosis

Results:

Mean age of the patients in all groups were 68±6, 69±3, 71±2 respectively, and 83% were male. Eight patients died in all groups at follow-up(seven in group 2 and 3, and one in group 1) and the difference between both groups was statistically significant (p<0.001). The follow-up period in the intensive care unit, and hospitalization period were not statistically different between CABG group and combined CEA plus CABG group.

Conclusion:

We think that the results of staged or combined CABG plus CEA surgery are satisfactory in patients with severe carotid disease and advanced coronary artery disease. However, the mortality and morbidity in both procedures are higher than those of alone.

Combined carotid endarterectomy and coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with asymptomatic high-grade stenoses: An analysis of 758 procedures

PURPOSE

Surgical treatment of hemodynamically significant carotid artery stenoses has been well documented, especially in the asymptomatic patient. However, in those patients presenting with hemodynamically significant asymptomatic carotid artery disease who are to undergo cardiac surgery, optimal treatment remains controversial. In this study, we analyze our experience with patients who underwent synchronous carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and coronary artery bypass graft procedures (CABG) for hemodynamically significant (>70%) asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis and coronary artery disease (CAD).

METHODS

Demographics and outcomes of all patients undergoing synchronous CEA/CABG for asymptomatic carotid stenosis between April 1980 and January 2005 were reviewed from our vascular registry and patient charts. We included patients who underwent standard patching of their carotid artery and those undergoing eversion CEA. All neurologic events within the first 30 days that persisted >24 hours were considered a stroke. For purposes of comparison, we also reviewed outcomes for patients undergoing synchronous CEA/CABG for symptomatic carotid stenosis.

RESULTS

Asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis (>70%) was the indication in 702 patients (276 women and 426 men) undergoing 758 CEAs. In the asymptomatic group, 22 patients, of which 21 succumbed to cardiac dysfunction, and one died from a hemorrhagic stroke. The overall mortality rate was 3.1%. Seven permanent nonfatal neurologic deficits occurred in this series (1 woman, 6 men). The combined stroke mortality was 4.3%. This compares to a 30-day stroke mortality of 6.1% in 132 symptomatic combined CEA/CABG patients. The difference in stroke mortality in women compared with men was not significant.

CONCLUSION

In this experience, patients presenting with hemodynamically significant (>70%) asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis can undergo synchronous CEA/CABG with low morbidity and mortality.

Simultaneous Carotid and Coronary Arteries Disease: Staged or Combined Surgical Approach?

BACKGROUND

Patients suffering from a concomitant coronary and carotid artery occlusive disease represent a high-risk population whose management remains controversial.

METHODS

Between April 1979 and June 2002, 202 patients (163 men and 39 women, mean age 65 +/- 7 years) were admitted at the Department of Cardiovascular Surgery of the University of Bologna for coronary artery bypass graft and carotid endarterectomy (CEA). In Group 1 (140 patients) coronary artery bypass graft and carotid endarterectomy were performed simultaneously while in Group 2 (62 patients) they were performed as two-staged procedures.

RESULTS

The rate of postoperative stroke was 6.4% in Group 1 (9/140) and 4.8% in Group 2 (3/62). Significant univariate predictors of myocardial infarction were smoking history and previous myocardial infarction; for stroke they were older, greater than 70 years, and a smoking history; for death the significant predictors were the operative approach, the low ejection fraction, smoking history, renal failure, and peripheral vascular occlusive disease. The hospital mortality was 6.4% in Group 1 versus 12.9% in Group 2.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the highly selected populations, the contemporary surgical results indicate that the management of these patients needs careful pre-, intra-, and postoperative assessment and timing aimed at reducing the ischemic injuries, both cerebral and cardiac, therefore we believe that the surgical technique should be individualized for each patient.

Association of increased carotid intima-media thickness with the extent of coronary artery disease

OBJECTIVE

To investigate (a) the relation between intima-media thickness (IMT) in carotid arteries and the extent of coronary artery disease (CAD); and (b) whether IMT is predictive of coronary atherosclerosis. The coexistence of severe extracranial atherosclerosis in patients with CAD was also analysed.

METHODS

Coronary angiography and carotid ultrasound evaluation were performed in 558 consecutive patients (438 men), with a mean (SD) age of 58.8 (9.2) years and suspected CAD. Mean IMT was measured at both carotid arteries and expressed as the mean aggregate value. The relation between IMT and severity of CAD was determined.

RESULTS

A significant correlation between mean IMT and advancing CAD (p < 0.0001) was found. Four independent predictors of CAD were found in the discriminant analysis: age (p = 0.0193), hyperlipidaemia (p < 0.0001), smoking (p = 0.0032), and IMT (p < 0.0001). A significant increase in IMT was observed among patients with one, two, and three vessel CAD. A log normal distribution of IMT values showed that if mean IMT was over 1.15 mm, patients had a 94% probability of having CAD, with sensitivity of 65% and specificity of 80% in the patients with a high risk of CAD. The number of critically stenosed extracranial arteries increased with advancing CAD. None of the patients with normal coronary arteries had severe stenosis of the extracranial arteries. Severe carotid, vertebral, or subclavian stenosis was found in 16.6% of patients with three vessel CAD.

CONCLUSIONS

IMT increases with advancing CAD, patients with mean IMT over 1.15 mm have a 94% likelihood of having CAD, and the coexistence of CAD with severe stenosis of aortic arch arteries is relatively high and was found in 16.6% of patients with three vessel CAD.

A systematic review of outcome following synchronous carotid endarterectomy and coronary artery bypass: Influence of surgical and patient variables

OBJECTIVES

Outcomes after synchronous carotid endarterectomy (CEA) plus coronary artery bypass (CABG) relative to surgical and patient based variables.

DESIGN

Systematic review of 94 published series (7863 synchronous procedures).

RESULTS

11.5% of patients died or suffered a stroke/myocardial infarction in the peri-operative period (95% CI 10.1-12.9). The risk of death/stroke appeared to significantly diminish in studies published between 1993-2002, compared with 1972-1992 (7.2% (95% CI 6.5-9.1) versus 10.7% (95% CI 8.9-12.5), p = 0.03). However, increasing operative experience was not associated with significantly lower risks of death/stroke; (1-49 cases (9.6% (95% CI 7.5-11.8); 50-99 cases (9.1% (95% CI 6.4-11.8); 100+ cases (8.4% (95% CI 6.9-10.1) (p = 0.64)). Patients with severe bilateral carotid disease were significantly more likely to suffer death and/or stroke compared to patients with unilateral disease (odds ratio 2.5, 95% CI 1.4-5.0, p = 0.001). Similarly, patients with a prior history of stroke/transient ischaemic attack (TIA) were significantly more likely to suffer a further stroke than asymptomatic patients (odds ratio 1.8, 95% CI 1.1-2.8, p = 0.008). There was no difference in the risk of death/stroke relative to the timing of CEA (pre- versus on-cardiopulmonary bypass), but recent small studies indicate that improved outcomes might be achieved by performing CABG 'off-bypass'.

CONCLUSIONS

Synchronous CEA + CABG is associated with a not insignificant cardiovascular risk. No comparable information is available for similar patients undergoing CABG without prophylactic CEA.

A systematic review of outcomes following staged and synchronous carotid endarterectomy and coronary artery bypass

OBJECTIVES

to determine the overall cardiovascular risk for patients with combined cardiac and carotid artery disease undergoing synchronous coronary artery bypass (CABG) and carotid endarterectomy (CEA), staged CEA then CABG and reverse staged CABG then CEA.

DESIGN

systematic review of 97 published studies following 8972 staged or synchronous operations.

RESULTS

mortality was highest in patients undergoing synchronous CEA+CABG (4.6%, 95% CI 4.1-5.2). Reverse staged procedures (CABG-CEA) were associated with the highest risk of ipsilateral stroke (5.8%, 95% CI 0.0-14.3) and any stroke (6.3%, 95% CI 1.0-11.7). Peri-operative myocardial infarction (MI) was lowest following the reverse staged procedure (0.9%, 95% CI 0.5-1.4) and highest in patients undergoing staged CEA-CABG (6.5%, 95% CI 3.2-9.7). The risk of death+/-any stroke was highest in patients undergoing synchronous CEA+CABG (8.7%, 95% CI 7.7-9.8) and lowest following staged CEA-CABG (6.1%, 95% CI 2.9-9.3). The risk of death/stroke or MI was 11.5% (95% CI 10.1-12.9) following synchronous procedures versus 10.2% (95% CI 7.4-13.1) after staged CEA then CABG.

CONCLUSIONS

10-12% of patients undergoing staged or synchronous procedures suffered death or major cardiovascular morbidity (stroke, MI) within 30 days of surgery. Overall, there was no significant difference in outcomes for staged and synchronous procedures and no comparable data for patients with combined cardiac and carotid disease not undergoing staged or synchronous surgery.

Multistate population-based outcomes of combined carotid endarterectomy and coronary artery bypass

OBJECTIVES

The management of combined carotid and coronary disease is controversial, and the outcomes of combined carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) have not been determined on a community-wide basis. This study was undertaken to evaluate the community-wide outcomes of combined CEA and CABG and to evaluate the risk for adverse events.

METHODS

A complete medical record review of 10,561 CEA procedures randomly selected from Medicare patients undergoing CEA in 10 states was performed. In this sample, 226 procedures were performed in combination with CABG in the same operative event.

RESULTS

Recent ipsilateral stroke or transient ischemic attack was the indication for the CEA in only 12% of patients undergoing CEA/CABG, and 56% were asymptomatic with respect to the carotid lesion. The combined stroke and death rate was 17.7% (25 nonfatal strokes, two fatal strokes, and 13 nonstroke deaths). Eighty percent of the nonfatal strokes were disabling. Proximal aortic arch atherosclerosis and symptomatic carotid stenosis were associated with stroke (P <.05). Female gender, emergent operation, redo CABG, blood pressure on pump, total pump time, presence of left main disease, and number of diseased coronaries were associated with mortality (P <.05). The strokes appeared to be associated with the operative event, but diagnosis was delayed and postevent carotid patency was not documented. Most strokes were not limited to the hemisphere ipsilateral to the CEA.

CONCLUSION

The community-wide outcomes of combined CEA/CABG in the Medicare population are inferior to those reported in many single-institution reviews. Diagnosis of postoperative stroke is often delayed, and most strokes are not limited to the hemisphere ipsilateral to the CEA operative site.

Safety and efficacy of one stage off-pump coronary artery operation and carotid endarterectomy

BACKGROUND

Patients with concomitant occlusive disease of coronary and carotid arteries remain at high risk of perioperative stroke and myocardial infarction. Combined coronary artery bypass grafting on cardiopulmonary bypass and carotid endarterectomy has been shown to give good results for this category of patients. In the present study, we analyzed our results of off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting and carotid endarterectomy as a one-stage procedure.

METHODS

Between January 1997 and December 2000, 82 patients underwent combined off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting and carotid endarterectomy. All patients were evaluated by preoperative carotid duplex scanning and carotid angiography. All patients had more than or equal to 70% carotid artery stenosis. There were 35 asymptomatic patients (42.7%) and 47 symptomatic patients (57.3%). Carotid endarterectomy was performed before coronary artery bypass grafting in all the patients.

RESULTS

There were 66 males (80.5%) and 16 females (19.5%) with a mean age of 63+/-8 years. The average number of grafts was 3.4+/-0.8. There was no hospital mortality. One patient had perioperative myocardial infarction. None of the patients had stroke. One patient had transient neurologic deficit and 1 patient had temporary 12th nerve dysfunction; both recovered completely. There was no incidence of neck wound infection, although 1 patient developed neck hematoma that required reexploration. At a mean follow-up of 2.2+/-0.7 years, 1 patient required contralateral carotid endarterectomy and 1 patient died because of cardiac failure.

CONCLUSIONS

Combined off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting and carotid endarterectomy is a safe and effective procedure in patients with significant concomitant carotid and coronary artery disease.

Coronary artery bypass and carotid endarterectomy: combined approach

Controversy exists concerning the best management of patients with coronary artery and carotid artery disease. Between June 1994 and July 2000, 88 patients with coronary artery and carotid artery disease underwent combined coronary artery surgery and carotid endarterectomy. Demographics and perioperative variables of these patients were compared with those of 266 patients undergoing isolated coronary artery surgery. Patients in the combined coronary artery bypass grafting and carotid endarterectomy group were elderly patients (p=0.0001) with a higher prevalence of female gender (p=0.0001), left ventricular dysfunction (p=0.006), left main coronary artery disease (p=0.033), triple-vessel coronary artery disease (p=0.002), unstable angina pectoris (p=0.004), and history of prior neurologic events (p=0.0001). Three (3.4%) patients in the combined group and 5 (1.9%) patients in the isolated coronary artery surgery group (p=0.317) developed perioperative myocardial infarction. Two (2.3%) patients in the combined group developed a permanent postoperative neurologic event. Hospital mortality was 5.7% (5 patients) in the combined coronary artery bypass grafting and carotid endarterectomy group and 1.5% (4 patients) in the isolated coronary artery surgery group (p=0.046). Patients with concomitant carotid and coronary artery disease have an advanced arteriosclerosis. Although combined coronary artery bypass grafting and carotid endarterectomy is associated with a higher risk of death and perioperative myocardial infarction than simple coronary artery surgery, this procedure is a preferable approach for these high-risk patients and results in lower neurologic morbidity.

Outcome after combined carotid endarterectomy and coronary artery bypass is related to patient selection

OBJECTIVE

The optimal management of patients with significant coronary and carotid artery disease remains controversial. Since reporting on a series of 100 patients undergoing combined carotid endarterectomy and coronary artery bypass (CEA/CAB) 4 years ago, we have liberalized our selection criteria for combined operation. We sought to compare outcomes of the recent cohort of 74 patients and the previous group.

METHODS

All patients who underwent CEA/CAB since 1984 have been tracked in a database containing identifying information, demographic factors, anatomic information, details of surgery, and short- and long-term follow-up data. We compared the 74 patients (Group 2) undergoing CEA/CAB since 1994 with the previously reported group of 100 patients (Group 1) who underwent CEA/CAB between 1984 and 1994. We examined demographic and comorbidity factors, presence of cerebrovascular symptoms, degree of contralateral carotid stenosis, and perioperative stroke and death. Statistical comparisons were made with the chi(2) test.

RESULTS

The groups had similar age and sex distributions and similar incidences of hypertension, diabetes, congestive heart failure, prior myocardial infarction, and hypercholesterolemia. More patients in Group 1 had preoperative transient cerebral ischemia or monocular blindness (55% vs 31%, P <.002) and preoperative stroke (18% vs 7%, P <.03). More patients in Group 2 had unilateral asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis (55% vs 18%, P <.001). The incidence of all perioperative strokes was higher in Group 1 (9% vs 1.4%, P <.035). There were fewer deaths (3% vs 8%) and ipsilateral strokes (0 vs 4%) in Group 2, though these were not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

We have liberalized our criteria for performing combined CEA/CAB, such that more than 50% of our recent patients have asymptomatic unilateral carotid stenosis. This practice is associated with a lower incidence of all perioperative strokes and a trend toward lower ipsilateral stroke and death. These observations suggest that perioperative stroke after CEA/CAB is related to patient selection and that low-risk patients can undergo CEA/CAB with the benefits of low morbidity, patient convenience, and cost savings from avoiding a second hospitalization and operation.

Coronary artery bypass combined with bilateral carotid endarterectomy

BACKGROUND

Surgical management of patients presenting for coronary artery bypass grafting with significant bilateral carotid artery stenosis has not been well defined. In this study, our preliminary results of coronary artery bypass grafting with concomitant bilateral carotid endarterectomy have been reviewed.

METHODS

A retrospective nonrandomized chart review was performed in 33 patients with unstable angina and bilateral carotid artery stenosis, more than 70%, undergoing simultaneous coronary artery bypass grafting and bilateral carotid endarterectomy using an eversion technique.

RESULTS

Concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting with bilateral carotid endarterectomy was performed urgently in 24 (73%) and electively in 9 (27%) patients. The average carotid artery cross-clamp and total perfusion times were 14.7 +/- 4.9 minutes and 123 +/- 29.2 minutes, respectively. The average length of stay in the cardiopulmonary intensive care unit was 4.2 +/- 14.2 days and total hospital stay was 16.2 +/- 20.5 days. Postoperative in-hospital stay was 14.9 +/- 20.3 days. There were no postoperative strokes. Twenty-one (64%) patients were discharged before the tenth postoperative day. Nonfatal postoperative complications occurred in 27% (9 of 33) of patients. The overall 30-day mortality was 6.1% (2 of 33) and that was unrelated to primary cardiac or cerebrovascular events.

CONCLUSIONS

Favorable outcome supports the justification for performing concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting with bilateral carotid endarterectomies in selected patients.

Bilateral carotid stenting combined with three-vessel percutaneous coronary intervention in single setting

We describe a patient who underwent bilateral internal carotid artery stenting and three-vessel percutaneous coronary intervention during the same procedure. Stenting of carotid arteries was performed employing our innovative technique combining coronary and peripheral devices. No complications occurred. The patient was discharged home 1 day after the intervention and remains asymptomatic, leading a fully active life. To our knowledge, unstaged bilateral carotid stenting combined with three-vessel coronary intervention has not been reported previously.

Combined Surgery for cardiac and carotid disease: management and results of a rational approach

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the present study was to apply a rational plan for simultaneous cardiac and carotid surgery in high-risk patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A consecutive series of 89 patients with coexisting severe cardiac and carotid disease were operated on during a 5-year period with routinary carotid shunting, moderate hypothermia and balanced anaesthesia. The combined surgical procedures were coronary artery by-pass grafts (CABG) + carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in 81 patients, CABG + CEA + aortic valve replacement (AVR) in four patients, and four cases of CEA + AVR. RESSULTS: Two deaths (2%), three acute myocardial infarctions (3%) and one (1%) major stroke occurred in five patients during the perioperative (30 days) period for a combined rate of death and/or disabling stroke of 3%. There were five reversible neurological deficits. Carotid and aortic mean clamping times were 9 and 60 min respectively. Patients were discharged after a mean length of stay in Intensive Care Unit (ICU) of 131 h and 7 days of hospitalisation post-ICU.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on our results, combined interventions of CEA and CABG can be performed with an acceptable morbidity and mortality when severe carotid stenosis is associated with advanced, symptomatic cardiac disease. The management of these patients needs careful and appropriate pre-intra and post-operative assessment and timing aimed to reduce the ischaemic injuries, both cardiac and cerebral, especially during CBP time.

Continuing controversy in the management of concomitant coronary and carotid disease: an overview

OBJECTIVES

To perform an analytical overview of the risk factors, pathogenesis of stroke and the strategies for the management of concomitant coronary artery disease and carotid artery stenosis (CAS). Four strategies were analysed; CABG in the presence of CAS, combined (CE+CABG), reverse (CABG+CE<3 months) and prior staged (CE+CABG<3 months).

METHODS

A literature search formed the basis of a reference database. Outcome was assessed by the 30-day permanent stroke and mortality rate for the different approaches. Accrued rates of permanent stroke and mortality rate were expressed in terms of mean stroke and mortality rate (MSR, MMR). Data was analysed comparatively and expressed in terms of P value, odds ratio and confidence limits.

RESULTS

33 different risk factors for stroke at CABG were identified. Significant factors included: ascending aortic atheroma, emergency procedures, impaired left ventricular function, cardioplegia and peripheral vascular disease. Risk of stroke at CABG increased with higher grade CAS (50 vs. 80%, P=0.009). Pathogenesis of stroke at CABG is multifactorial; the role of flow limiting CAS is controversial and other mechanisms are implicated. Analysis of the four strategies revealed that in the Prior Stage (n=573) the MSR was 1.5% and MMR 5.9%, in the Unprotected CABG+CAS series the MSR was 3.8% (n=840) and MMR (n=596) 4.4%, in the Reverse stage series (n=83) the MSR was 2.4%, and MMR 4.8%. For Combined procedures (n=3,295) the MSR was 3.9% and MMR 4.5%. Comparative analysis indicated a significant reduction in stroke for Prior vs. Combined (1.5 vs. 3.9%, P=0.007, odds 0.39, CI 0.2-0.77) with a higher mortality (5.9 vs. 4.5%, P=0.1, odds 1.41, Cl 0.96-2.06, NS). The stroke rate in the Prior stage also remained significantly lower compared to the Unprotected CABG group both mixed (P=0.015) and asymptomatic CAS (P=0.047). When total risks (MSR+MMR), were analysed, similar results were found between the groups; Prior 7.4%, Reverse stage 7.2%, Combined 8.4%, Unprotected CABG+ >50% CAS 11.5%.

CONCLUSIONS

Stroke at CABG is due to multiple risk factors, one of which is high-grade carotid stenosis. Pathophysiology of stroke, although multifactorial, supports embolism rather than flow limitation as the primary mechanism. Lack of randomised trials has made it impossible to draw firm conclusions regarding the best management strategy. There was no significant difference in the overall stroke and mortality risk between the various strategies, however, subgroup analysis suggests that, when carefully selected, patients do better by staging the operations. In our opinion patients without severe cardiac disease should be considered for Prior staging and the rest for Combined procedure. The role of reverse staging needs further evaluation.

Management of coexisting coronary artery and asymptomatic carotid artery disease: report of a series of patients treated with coronary bypass alone

BACKGROUND

A retrospective chart review of 94 patients with asymptomatic high-grade carotid stenosis undergoing coronary bypass (and valve replacement in some cases) was performed to determine whether significant carotid lesions can be safely ignored in patients undergoing cardiac surgical procedures. These operations were performed during a 2-year period.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

There were 55 men and 39 women, with an age range of 37-89 years. Seventy-one patients had unilateral high-grade carotid stenosis, 17 patients had bilateral high-grade lesions, and six patients had unilateral high-grade stenosis and contralateral occlusion. Associated medical problems were recorded and short-term follow-up was obtained.

RESULTS

There was one perioperative stroke and no deaths in this group of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Although these data indicate that high-grade carotid stenoses may be safely ignored during cardiac surgical procedures, a multicentre prospective randomized trial is needed to determine the appropriate treatment of the patient with coexisting carotid and coronary artery disease.

Combined carotid endarterectomy and coronary artery bypass: immediate and long-term results

Data from 213 cases of simultaneous carotid endarterectomy and coronary artery bypass grafting (CEN/CABG) were analyzed (1980-1996). There were 154 males (72.3%), and 59 females (27.7%), (mean age: 65. 6 years, range: 42-83). One hundred and thirty-two patients (62.0%) had angina, 58 (37.2%) had myocardial infarction, and 23 (10.8%) had congestive heart failure. Symptomatic cerebrovascular disease was present in 89 patients (41.7%). One hundred and twenty-two patients (57.2%) had three-vessel coronary artery disease, 41 (19.2%) had left main disease, and 27 (12.6%) had a low ejection fraction (ejection fraction </=30%). Significant (>/=75% diameter reduction) stenosis was present in 168 (78.8%) of the operated carotid arteries. The contralateral internal carotid artery was severely stenosed or occluded in 35 patients (16.4%). The hospital mortality rate was 5. 6% (12 patients). The cause of death was cardiac in ten patients (4. 6%), and neurologic in two (1%). Eleven patients (5.1%) developed a stroke postoperatively; eight strokes were ipsilateral to the operated artery, and six were permanent. Myocardial infarction occurred in five patients (2.3%). Independent predictors of early mortality were age >62 years, hypertension, and postoperative stroke (p < 0.05). Male sex was the only independent predictor of neurologic morbidity (p < 0.05). Late follow-up data were obtained for 163 (81.0%) patients (mean: 54.8 months, range: 1-168). Four (9. 3%) out of the 43 late deaths were attributed to strokes. There were three (1.8%) late ipsilateral strokes, and five (3.1%) contralateral strokes. The 5- and 10-year survival probabilities were 75 +/- 4%, and 52 +/- 6.9%. The freedom from late ipsilateral neurologic morbidity at 5 and 10 years were 97 +/- 1.7% and 90 +/- 4.0%, respectively. Taken together, the results indicate that combined carotid endarterectomy and coronary artery bypass grafting can be performed safely in this high-risk group of patients. Excellent long-term freedom from stroke can be expected.

Surgery for asymptomatic carotid stenosis: a study of three patient subgroups

The purpose of this retrospective study was to determine whether patients who undergo prophylactic surgery for asymptomatic carotid stenosis represent a single homogeneous population. Of the 805 carotid reconstructions performed between January 1984 and December 1992, a total of 357 were for asymptomatic atherosclerotic stenosis in 312 patients (227 men, 85 women) with a mean age of 69.6 years. Patients were divided into three groups. Group I included 141 patients (161 procedures) who presented no neurologic manifestations. Group II included 49 patients (55 procedures) who underwent carotid reconstruction before or at the same time as another cardiovascular procedure. Group III included 122 patients (141 procedures) who presented nonhemispheric manifestations. Patients in group III had a significantly higher number of obstructive lesions in brain arteries (p < 0.01). Seven patients died within the first 30 postoperative days, including three who underwent combined single-stage procedures. Nine patients presented nonfatal stroke, including three who progressively recovered. The cumulative death-stroke rate (CDSR) was 5.12% overall, 3.54% in group I, 12.24% in group II, and 4.09% in group III. The difference between groups I and II was statistically significant (p < 0.05). Taking into account only deaths related to carotid surgery and stroke with permanent disability, the CDSR was 2. 83% in group I and 3.25% in group III. Follow-up ranged from 24 to 132 months (mean: 66.2) with a total of 11 patients being lost from follow-up. Actuarial 5-year survival was 81.99 +/- 7.13% in group I, 70.65 +/- 13.72% in group II, and 68.51 +/- 8.93% in group III. Differences between group I and both groups II (p < 0.01) and III (p < 0.05) were statistically significant. Overall 5-year patency was 95.59 +/- 2.28%. Stroke occurred during follow-up in 13 patients. The probability of stroke-free survival was 95.29 +/- 3.76% in group I, 91.03 +/- 8.52% in group II, and 89.09 +/- 6.39% in group III. The difference between groups I and III was statistically significant (p < 0.05). Patients with asymptomatic carotid lesions can be divided into different prognostic groups. Life expectancy is shorter for patients with multiple artery disease. Long-term stroke risk is higher in patients with nonhemispheric neurological manifestations.

Rapid-staged strategy for concomitant critical carotid and left main coronary disease with left ventricular dysfunction: IABP use

BACKGROUND

Few reports address the high-risk patient population with concomitant critical carotid and left main coronary disease with left ventricular dysfunction. To decrease the risks involved with the simultaneous and traditional staged surgical approaches, we developed a rapid staging strategy using an intraaortic balloon pump.

METHODS

Between 1992 and 1996, 20 patients presented with a high-risk "triad" defined by greater than 70% stenosis of the left main coronary artery, ejection fraction less than 0.30, and greater than 90% stenosis of the internal carotid artery. An intraaortic balloon pump was placed immediately before carotid endarterectomy under angiographic guidance. Less than 24 hours later (mean, 18 hours) coronary artery bypass grafting was performed, and the intraaortic balloon pump was removed the day of coronary artery bypass grafting in all cases (total IABP duration, <36 hours).

RESULTS

Eighteen patients (18/20) were extubated on the day of coronary artery bypass grafting (mean, 12 hours). Sixteen patients (16/20) were transferred from the intensive care unit within 48 hours, with total hospital stay ranging from 6 to 12 days (mean, 8 days). There were no 30-day postoperative deaths, myocardial infarctions, or neurologic, vascular, bleeding, or other major complications. At a mean 29.4-month follow-up, there were two noncardiac deaths and no neurologic events. Six-month, 1-year, and 2-year follow-up ultrasounds showed all operative carotid arteries remained patent.

CONCLUSIONS

A rapid staged procedure with angiographically guided placement of the intraaortic balloon pump was safe and effective in this very high risk patient population. It may be an option to decrease the risks involved with simultaneous operations and increase the efficiency and safety of "traditional" staged carotid and coronary artery bypass grafting procedures.

Early extubation and neurologic examination following combined carotid endarterectomy and coronary artery bypass grafting using remifentanil

Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) as a combined procedure is occurring with increasing frequency. CEA-CABG incurs the morbidity of both procedures, and considerations for this procedure include anesthetic techniques that provide hemodynamic stability and prompt emergence from anesthesia. We present, to our knowledge, the first reported use in a combined CEA-CABG of the novel opioid remifentanil as a component of the anesthetic technique to achieve these goals. Remifentanil allows for early neurologic evaluation without sacrificing the hemodynamic stability of traditional, high-dose opioid techniques.

Multicenter review of preoperative risk factors for endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The benefit of carotid endarterectomy is highly dependent on surgical risk. However, little data are available concerning factors affecting the risk of endarterectomy performed for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis outside the setting of a randomized controlled trial. The purpose of this study was to analyze the impact of potential preoperative risk factors on the frequency of postoperative complications in patients undergoing the operation for asymptomatic disease in academic medical centers.

METHODS

Data regarding postoperative complications were systematically abstracted from the medical records of a random sample of patients who underwent carotid endarterectomy at 12 academic medical centers.

RESULTS

Of 1160 procedures reviewed, 463 (40%) were performed for asymptomatic disease. Postoperative stroke or death occurred in 13 (2.8%), and myocardial infarction occurred in 8 (1.7%). The rate of postoperative stroke or death was lower in asymptomatic patients than in those with a history of cerebrovascular symptoms in a different vascular distribution, but the difference was not significant (1.8% versus 4.2%; P=.21). There were no significant differences in these rates based on race, a history of angina, recent myocardial infarction, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hypertension, the degree of stenosis of the contralateral or ipsilateral carotid artery, or the presence of angiographically recognized ulceration, intraluminal thrombus, or siphon stenosis in the ipsilateral vessel (chi(2); P>.05). Postoperative stroke or death was more frequent in women (5.3% versus 1.6% in men; P=.02), in those aged 75 years or older (7.8% versus 1.8% in those younger than 75 years; P=.01), and in those with a history of congestive heart failure (8.6% versus 2.3% in those without a history of congestive heart failure; P=.03). The risk of stroke or death was higher in the 16 patients who had carotid endarterectomy performed in combination with coronary artery bypass surgery than in those who had only endarterectomy (18.7% versus 2.1%; P<.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The overall risk of postoperative stroke or death was nearly twice that reported by Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study (ACAS) investigators in the setting of a clinical trial but was within acceptable guidelines. Women were at higher postoperative risk than men, which supported ACAS findings. Additional high-risk groups were those aged 75 years or older, those with a history of congestive heart failure, and those undergoing prophylactic endarterectomy for asymptomatic stenosis in combination with coronary surgery. Knowledge of these rates may help to better assess an individual's postoperative risk and therefore the anticipated benefit of surgery.

Cardiac disorders and stroke

Cardiac disorders are increasingly recognised as an important source of cerebral embolism. Atrial fibrillation is the most common cardiac dysrrhythmia that can predispose to stroke. Recent advances have significantly increased the identification of clinical, hematological and echocardiographic risk factors that predict the occurrence of atrial fibrillation related stroke. Also, clinical risk stratification has been used to determine medical therapy (aspirin or warfarin) for prevention of atrial fibrillation related brain embolization. Among the various structural heart diseases causing stroke, the role of patent foramen ovale remains controversial. Strides have been made in the use of ultrasonographic techniques such as transesophageal echocardiography and contrast transcranial doppler to detect patent foramen ovale. Coronary artery bypass grafting is often performed in patients with concomitant aortic atheroma and carotid stenosis that may predispose to stroke in the perioperative period. It is now possible to identify perioperatively significant aortic atherosclerosis (using transesophageal echocardiography and aortic ultrasound) and significant carotid disease (using carotid ultrasound) and make appropriate modifications in surgical technique to reduce the incidence of coronary artery bypass grafting related stroke. Because of shared risk factors it is not surprising that coronary artery disease is frequently found in stroke patients. Recent studies suggest that more than one-third of stroke patients have asymptomatic coronary artery disease. Conversely, the brain damaged by infarction may itself be responsible for the production of cardiac structural and electrical abnormalities. Both these factors may contribute to the finding that cardiac events are the leading cause of death in stroke patients on long term follow-up. Recognition of these correlations has enhanced our ability to treat and prevent stroke related mortality.

Is an integrated approach warranted for concomitant carotid and coronary artery disease?

BACKGROUND

The management of patients with severe, concomitant coronary and carotid artery occlusive disease is controversial.

METHODS

Between 1975 and 1996, 512 patients (mean age, 64.9 years; 70% male) were admitted for coronary revascularization; 316 (61.7%) had asymptomatic, severe carotid disease (stenosis > 70%) and 196 (38.3%) had symptomatic carotid disease (159 [31.1%] with transient ischemia and 37 [7.2%] with completed stroke). In group 1, coronary revascularization and carotid endarterectomy were simultaneously performed in 255 patients (49.8%) with unstable angina. In group 2 (staged approach), carotid endarterectomy was performed before coronary revascularization in 257 patients (50.2%) without unstable angina.

RESULTS

Before 1986, the incidence of stroke and death was greater in group 1 (n = 149) than in group 2 (n = 156) (14 [9.4%] versus 4 [2.6%]; p < 0.01). Since 1986, outcomes in group 1 (n = 106) and group 2 (n = 101) have been similar for stroke (2 [1.9%] versus 2 [2.0%]), death (4 [3.8%] versus 3 [3.0%]), and myocardial infarction (4 [3.8%] versus 5 [5.0%]). Significant univariate and multivariate predictors of adverse outcome were primarily heart-related (reoperation, intraaortic balloon use, ejection fraction < 0.50, and angina grade 4 for death; age > 70 years and congestive heart failure for stroke).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite highly selected populations, contemporary surgical results do not indicate that staged treatment of severe, concomitant coronary and carotid artery occlusive disease has an advantage over simultaneous treatment. Advances in myocardial protection and perioperative hemodynamic management may account for the low incidences of stroke and death in these operations.

Simultaneous carotid endarterectomy and coronary bypass: perioperative risk and long-term survival

PURPOSE

The purpose of this article is to examine the outcome of simultaneous coronary bypass-carotid endarterectomy (CABG-CEA) and to compare it with the outcome of endarterectomy alone (CEA alone) in patients at high cardiac risk.

METHODS

A retrospective review of the records and follow-up data for 100 consecutive patients who had undergone CABG-CEA and were at high risk and 114 patients who had undergone CEA, had overt coronary artery disease (angina, previous infarct, or ischemic electrocardiographic abnormalities), but had not undergone CABG was carried out.

RESULTS

Our CABG-CEA group had a high incidence of symptomatic carotid disease (57%) and contralateral occlusion (28%) when compared with patients in other reports. Patients in the CABG-CEA group were older (67.9 +/- 8.3 years vs 63.6 +/- 15.7 years, p = 0.01) and more often smokers (81% vs 52.6%, p = 0.01) than patients in the CEA alone group. Perioperative mortality was 8% for the CEA-CABG group and for 1.8% for the CEA alone group (p = 0.035). Perioperative stroke morbidity was 9% for the CEA-CABG group and 2.6% for the CEA alone group (p = 0.05). Life table survival at 1,3, and 5 years was 90%, 82%, and 73% versus 96%, 84%, and 76% for the CABG-CEA and CEA alone groups, respectively (p = 0.30).

CONCLUSIONS

Selection criteria for CABG-CEA greatly influence perioperative risk. Despite the greater age and more advanced coronary artery disease in the CABG-CEA group, long-term outcome differences are accounted for entirely by differences in perioperative morbidity and mortality. Prospective trials of strategies such as staged CEA and CABG to reduce perioperative risk are needed.

Perioperative morbidity and mortality in combined vs. staged approaches to carotid and coronary revascularization

Between 1986 and 1994 we identified 57 patients who underwent carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) during the same hospitalization. Simultaneous CABG and CEA was performed in 28 patients (mean age 70.5 years, 58% male). Indications for CABG in these patients were myocardial infarction in two crescendo angina in 19, congestive heart failure in two and left main or triple-vessel coronary artery disease noted during carotid preoperative evaluation in five. Indications for CEA were transient ischemic attack (TIA) in 12, crescendo TIA in six, cerebrovascular accident (CVA) in five, and asymptomatic stenosis in five. There were no postoperative myocardial infarctions or perioperative deaths. Two patients developed atrial fibrillation, and four patients had CVAs (two were ipsilateral to the side of CEA). Twenty-nine patients underwent staged procedures (i.e., not performed concomitantly but during the same hospitalization). Indications for CABG and CEA were comparable to those in the group undergoing simultaneous procedures. In 17 patients CEA was performed before CABG. There was a single CVA, the result of an intracerebral hemorrhage. Five of the 17 patients had a myocardial infarction and two died; one patient had first-degree heart block requiring a pacemaker. Four additional patients developed atrial fibrillation, one of whom required cardioversion. The remaining 12 patients had CABG followed by CEA. There were no CVAs, myocardial infarctions, arrhythmias, or deaths in this subgroup. These data demonstrate that the performance of simultaneous CABG and CEA procedures is associated with increased neurologic morbidity (14.3%), both ipsilateral and contralateral to the side of carotid surgery in contrast to staged CABG and CEA (3.4%). In addition, when staged carotid surgery preceded coronary revascularization in those with severe coronary artery disease, the combined cardiac complication and mortality rate was significantly higher than when coronary revascularization preceded CEA. This evidence suggests that when CABG and CEA must be performed during the same hospitalization, the procedures should be staged with CABG preceding CEA.