Roux-Y choledochojejunostomy and duodenojejunostomy for the complicated duodenal diverticulum

A perforation of a duodenal diverticulum in a 97-year-old patient after total gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y reconstruction: a case report

Most duodenal diverticula (DD) are asymptomatic and rarely develop perforations. Perforation is the most serious complication of DD and often requires emergency surgery. A 97-year-old woman who had undergone total gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y reconstruction 30 years ago was referred to our department with chief complaints of abdominal pain and fever during her hospitalization after femoral neck fracture surgery in the orthopedic department. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography showed free air and residue in the abdominal cavity and right retroperitoneum, and an emergency laparotomy was performed. The abdominal cavity was mildly contaminated, and a 6-cm DD with a 1-cm perforation in the wall of the diverticulum on the contralateral side of the mesentery of the duodenum was found. Diverticulectomy and duodenal closure were performed and a drainage tube was placed. The patient experienced no complications and was transferred to the orthopedic department on postoperative day 10. Reports of perforation of DD after gastrectomy are very rare. Particular attention should be paid to perforation of DD after Billroth-II and Roux-en-Y reconstructions as they involve the formation of a duodenal stump that differs from the normal anatomy and may be highly invasive surgical procedures, depending on the degree of inflammation and fistula formation.

[Diverticula in the gastrointestinal tract]

The prevalence of diverticula varies depending on the location within the gastrointestinal tract. Diverticula of the esophagus, stomach and small intestine are rare, more frequent are peripapillary diverticula and colonic diverticula. Meckel diverticula can also be of relevance in adults. Diverticula have to be differentiated from intramural pseudodiverticulosis of the esophagus and bile duct cysts. An endoscopic and radiological diagnostic work-up is only necessary for symptomatic diverticula or complications. In some cases additional functional diagnostic tests, such as high-resolution esophageal manometry to detect underlying motility disorders (Zenker's diverticulum, epiphrenic diverticulum) or the hydrogen breath test to detect bacterial overgrowth in the small intestine (diverticula of the small intestine) are mandatory. Effective treatment requires the close interdisciplinary cooperation between different specialist disciplines. Therapeutic modalities include pharmacotherapy, endoscopy and surgical methods.

Recurrent ascending cholangitis with acute pancreatitis and pancreatic atrophy caused by a juxtapapillary duodenal diverticulum: A case report and literature review

RATIONALE

Intermittent combined pancreaticobiliary obstruction may lead to multiple episodes of ascending cholangitis and pancreatitis, usually due to choledocholithiasis or periampullary mass. However, one of the rare causes is periampullary or juxtapapillary duodenal diverticulum. Although duodenal diverticula are relatively common in the general population, the overwhelming majority are asymptomatic. Duodenal diverticula can cause combined pancreaticobiliary obstruction through multiple mechanisms such as stasis-induced primary choledocholithiasis, stasis-induced intradiverticular enterolith, or longstanding diverticulitis, causing stenosing fibrosing papillitis or a combination of more than one of these mechanisms. Herein, I report a case of Lemmel syndrome due to a combination of multiple mechanisms and review the available literature on the epidemiology, pathogenesis, clinical presentation, diagnostic work-up, and management of juxtapapillary duodenal diverticulum.

PATIENT CONCERNS

Multiple episodes of abdominal pain, jaundice, anorexia, fever, and significant unintentional weight loss.

DIAGNOSES AND INTERVENTIONS

Primary choledocholithiasis, recurrent ascending cholangitis, recurrent acute pancreatitis, and pancreatic atrophy due to giant juxtapapillary duodenal diverticulum, with unsuccessful endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography that was completely resolved after open transduodenal sphincteroplasty and septoplasty, transampullary and transcystic common bile duct exploration and stone extraction, and duodenal diverticular inversion.

OUTCOME

Complete resolution of combined pancreaticobiliary obstruction without recurrence for 2 years after surgery.

LESSONS

Surgeons should be aware of such rare syndromes to avoid misdiagnosis and delayed or inappropriate management. Furthermore, they should understand the different available operative options for cases that are refractory to endoscopic approach.

Two cases of a perforated duodenal diverticulum after gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y reconstruction

Background

What type of reconstruction procedure should be applied is one of the important issues in surgery for gastric cancer. We have several options for reconstruction procedure after distal gastrectomy. The Billroth II and Roux-en-Y reconstruction have a duodenal stump while the Billroth I does not have it, which is the biggest structural difference in these procedures. An increase in intraduodenal pressure due to the formation of duodenum stump occasionally causes severe complication such as duodenal stump leakage; however, a duodenal diverticulum perforation after the Roux-en-Y reconstruction has not yet been reported. Herein, we report two cases of a perforated duodenal diverticulum after gastrectomy with the Roux-en-Y reconstruction.

Case presentation

The first case was a 66-year-old man who presented to our hospital with an acute onset right-upper-quadrant abdominal pain. He had undergone laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with the Roux-en-Y reconstruction for the early gastric cancer 15 months before. A large periampullary diverticulum had been detected during the checkup before the gastrectomy. Abdominal contrast-enhanced CT showed a retroperitoneal fluid collection with gas present at the second part of the duodenum. Therefore, a perforated duodenal diverticulum with abdominal abscess was diagnosed, and an emergency laparotomy was performed. Pancreaticoduodenectomy was performed because of severe duodenal inflammation and surrounding tissue damage. The second case was a 52-year-old man who had undergone open distal gastrectomy for locally advanced gastric cancer. Multiple non-ampullary duodenal diverticula had also been identified during the preoperative checkup. On the 2nd postoperative day, he presented with a sudden-onset abdominal pain with peritoneal irritation signs, and intestinal fluid was identified through the intraperitoneal drainage tube placed in a suprapancreatic site during his previous gastrectomy. Therefore, an emergency laparotomy was performed. During laparotomy, a perforated diverticulum at the second part of the duodenum was detected. The perforated duodenum diverticulum was directly sutured with drainage of the retroperitoneal space.

Conclusions

It is necessary to recognize that the Roux-en-Y reconstruction after gastrectomy for gastric cancer patients with duodenal diverticulum might cause a perforation of the diverticulum.

The clinical importance of different localizations of the papilla associated with juxtapapillary duodenal diverticula

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have evaluated the presence of juxtapapillary duodenal diverticula (JPDD) and the association with pancreatobiliary disease, but not the association of the papilla with an existing JPDD. We investigated the association of different localizations of the papilla with JPDD.

METHODS

We studied patients in whom JPDD was detected during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Patients were classified into 3 groups: 1) papilla located inside the diverticulum, 2) papilla located at the edge of the diverticulum and 3) papilla located closer than 3 cm to the diverticulum. The patients were examined with respect to localization of papilla-diverticula and to the association of the localization with pancreaticobiliary disease.

RESULTS

We enrolled 274 patients in our study. Biliary stone disease more frequently existed in group 3. The number of patients presenting with obstructive jaundice was higher in groups 2 (83.6%) and 3 (83.3%) than group 1 (66%). Cholangitis was more common in group 1 (21.3%) than in groups 2 (6.7%) and 3 (2.3%). The presence of biliary stone disease among patients presenting with pancreatitis was significantly different between groups 1 and 3 (p = 0.013) and between groups 2 and 3 (p = 0.017). The common bile duct more frequently contained stones or sludge in group 3 than in groups 1 and 2.

CONCLUSION

When the papilla is located close to the JPDD, the incidence of biliary stone disease decreases, and pancreatobiliary diseases are caused mostly in the absence of biliary stone disease.

Management of complicated duodenal diverticula

The duodenum is the second most common location of intestinal diverticula after the colon. Duodenal diverticulum (DD) is usually located in the second portion of the duodenum (D2), close to the papilla. Most duodenal diverticula are extraluminal and acquired rather than congenital; more rare is the congenital, intraluminal diverticulum. DD is usually asymptomatic and discovered incidentally, but can become symptomatic in 1% to 5% of cases when complicated by gastroduodenal, biliary and/or pancreatic obstruction, by perforation or by hemorrhage. Endoscopic treatment is the most common first-line treatment for biliopancreatic complications caused by juxtapapillary diverticula and also for bleeding. Conservative treatment of perforated DD based on fasting and broad-spectrum antibiotics may be offered in some selected cases when diagnosis is made early in stable patients, or in elderly patients with comorbidities who are poor operative candidates. Surgical treatment is currently reserved for failure of endoscopic or conservative treatment. The main postoperative complication of diverticulectomy is duodenal leak or fistula, which carries up to a 30% mortality rate.

Surgical management of pancreaticobiliary disease associated with juxtapapillary duodenal diverticula: case series and review of the literature

INTRODUCTION

Juxtapapillary duodenal diverticula (DD), although usually asymptomatic, are occasionally associated with pancreaticobiliary conditions such as recurrent bile duct stones, cholangitis, and pancreatitis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An unusual case of DD associated with a dorsal duct stricture in a patient with recurrent pancreatitis and pancreas divisum is presented along with three additional instances of surgically treated DD and a review of the literature.

RESULTS

The role of surgical intervention depends upon the specific nature of the presentation and the anatomical relationship of the diverticulum to the ampullary and pancreaticobiliary ductal system.

CONCLUSION

Operations that divert bile and the food stream from DD are preferred over diverticulectomy.

Abdominal pain in a young woman (2009: 8b)

Juxtapapillary duodenal diverticula and their possible complications are not frequent findings. We present the case of a woman with a giant juxtapapillary diverticulum, complicated by diverticulitis and areas of perforation of the wall that required urgent surgical treatment. We present the preoperative findings on computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging.

Diagnosis and management of the symptomatic duodenal diverticulum: a case series and a short review of the literature

INTRODUCTION

The incidence of duodenal diverticula (DD) found at autopsy may be as high as 22%. Perforation is the least frequent but also the most serious complication. This case series gives an overview of the management of this rare entity.

METHODS

This study is a case series of eight patients treated for symptomatic DD.

RESULTS

Two patients had a perforated DD. One perforation was in segments III-IV, which to our knowledge is the first published case; the other perforation was in segment II. A segmental duodenectomy was performed in the first patient and a pylorus-preserving duodeno-pancreatectomy (pp-Whipple) in the second. A third patient with chronic complaints and recurring episodes of fever required an excision of the DD. In a fourth patient with biliary and pancreatic obstruction, a pp-Whipple was carried out, and a DD was discovered as the underlying cause. Four patients (one small perforation, one hemorrhage, and two recurrent cholangitis/pancreatitis caused by a DD) were treated conservatively.

CONCLUSIONS

Symptomatic DD and, in particular, perforations are rare, encompass diagnostic challenges, and may require technically demanding surgical or endoscopic interventions. The diagnostic value of forward-looking gastroduodenoscopy in this setting seems limited. If duodenoscopy is performed at all, the use of a side-viewing endoscope is mandatory.

A life-saving but inadequately discussed procedure: tube duodenostomy. Known and unknown aspects

OBJECTIVE

The most successful method of managing the difficult duodenum, including the stump leakage, has been the tube duodenostomy technique, but it has not gained wide acceptance and is rarely used. The purpose of this study is to describe the details of the procedure for indication, technical approach, and postoperative care.

METHODS

During the period from 1998 to 2006, a tube duodenostomy was performed in 31 patients for possible insecure duodenal stump closure during gastric resection, postoperative duodenal stump leakage, duodenal leak after primary closure of duodenum for perforation or injury, or anostomotic leak after choledochoduodenostomy. All of the tube duodenostomies were performed through the open end of the duodenum. We also inserted a T-tube into the common bile duct in 19 of 31 patients (61.2 %) with tube duodenostomy.

RESULTS

A tube duodenostomy was performed in the primary operation in 15 of 31 patients. None of those 15 patients required a second operation, and there were no leaks and no deaths. Among the larger group (31 patients), there was one (3.2 %) duodenal stump leak after tube duodenostomy, and it ceased spontaneously; one patient had a subhepatic collection after removal of the duodenostomy tube, and three patients had associated incisional infections. Two patients died; one after a myocardial infarction and the other from irreversible sepsis. The mean length of hospital stay was 26.9 days.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that tube duodenostomy is a simple, effective, and safe method to prevent rupture of an insecure duodenal stump or to treat the leakage from the duodenal stump or primary repair on the duodenum.

Intraduodenal diverticulum associated with a double common bile duct causing recurrent pancreatitis and cholangitis: report of a case

Intraduodenal diverticulum (IDD) is a rare congenital anomaly, arising at or near the papilla of Vater. Double common bile duct (DCBD) is another rare congenital anomaly of the biliary system. Recognition of these abnormalities is essential to prevent the development of lesions in the biliary system, as well as to avoid unnecessary surgical intervention. Although both conditions are often asymptomatic, severe clinical conditions may develop. Intraduodenal diverticulum should always be considered as a possible cause of pancreatitis of unknown etiology. We report a rare case of IDD with DCBD in a patient with Lemmel's syndrome, which consists of obstructive jaundice, acute pancreatitis, and suppurative cholangitis. The patient was treated successfully with a Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy.

AM. Tratamento de doença bílio-pancreática em pacientes portadores de divertículo duodenal periampolar

OBJETIVO: Analisar o tratamento da doença bílio-pancreática na presença do divertículo periampolar. MÉTODO: De janeiro de 1999 a julho de 2003, 13 doentes com diagnóstico de divertículo periampolar e doença bílio-pancreática associada foram tratados pelo grupo de vias biliares e pâncreas do Departamento de Cirurgia da Santa Casa de São Paulo. Foram analisados retrospectivamente quanto à idade, sexo, quadro clínico e exames laboratoriais e radiológicos, com intuito diagnóstico. O tratamento endoscópico ou cirúrgico e seus resultados foram avaliados. RESULTADOS: Quatro pacientes eram do sexo masculino (30,8%) e nove (69,2%) do sexo feminino, a maioria com idade superior a 70 anos. Os principais sintomas foram de icterícia (61,5%) e dor abdominal (53,8%). Dois doentes apresentaram-se com pancreatite aguda e um com hemorragia digestiva alta. Onze doentes tinham coledocolitíase e dois, diagnóstico de colangiocarcinoma. Dez doentes foram submetidos a colangio-pancreatografia retrógrada endoscópica com 30% de sucesso no tratamento da coledocolitíase. Os outros doentes foram operados: três coledocoduodenostomias, quatro coledocolitotomias com drenagem em T da via biliar. Três doentes foram submetidos à diverticulectomia (23,1%) e um deles (7,7%) à papiloesfincteroplastia. A mortalidade na amostra foi de 7,7%. CONCLUSÃO: A taxa de sucesso do tratamento endoscópico da coledocolitíase foi baixa na presença de divertículo periampolar e a diverticulectomia com ou sem esfincteroplastia pode elevar a morbidade e a mortalidade nestes doentes.

Duodenal Switch Procedure for Benign Duodenal Disorders

The duodenal switch operation has been found to be a very useful operation for a variety of nonbariatric procedures. A small series of patients operated on for primary bowel reflux, duodenal diverticula, and benign duodenal obstruction have all faired well. This procedure offers a much more physiologic approach to certain duodenal problems than a gastric jejunojejunostomy.

Embryologic and anatomic basis of duodenal surgery

The following points should be remembered by surgeons (Table 1). In writing about the head of the pancreas, the common bile duct, and the duodenum in 1979, the authors stated that Embryologically, anatomically and surgically these three entities form an inseparable unit. Their relations and blood supply make it impossible for the surgeon to remove completely the head of the pancreas without removing the duodenum and the distal part of the common bile duct. Here embryology and anatomy conspire to produce some of the most difficult surgery of the abdominal cavity. The only alternative procedure, the so-called 95% pancreatectomy, leaves a rim of pancreas along the medial border of the duodenum to preserve the duodenal blood supply. The authors had several conversations with Child, one of the pioneers of this procedure, whose constant message was to always be careful with the blood supply of the duodenum (personal communication, 1970). Beger et al popularized duodenum-preserving resection of the pancreatic head, emphasizing preservation of endocrine pancreatic function. They reported that ampullectomy (removal of the papilla and ampulla of Vater) carries a mortality rate of less than 0.4% and a morbidity rate of less than 10.0%. Surgeons should not ligate the superior and inferior pancreaticoduodenal arteries because such ligation may cause necrosis of the head of the pancreas and of much of the duodenum. The accessory pancreatic duct of Santorini passes under the gastrointestinal artery. For safety, surgeons should ligate the artery away from the anterior medial duodenal wall, where the papilla is located, thereby avoiding injury to or ligation of the duct. "Water under the bridge" applies not only to the relationship of the uterine artery and ureter but also to the gastroduodenal artery and the accessory pancreatic duct. In 10% of cases, the duct of Santorini is the only duct draining the pancreas, so ligation of the gastroduodenal artery with accidental inclusion of the duct is catastrophic. With the Kocher maneuver, surgeons reconstruct the primitive mesoduodenum and achieve mobilization of the duodenum, which is useful for some surgical procedures. Surgeons should not skeletonize more than 2 cm of the first part of the duodenum. If more than 2 cm of skeletonization is done, a duodenostomy using a Foley catheter may be necessary to avoid blow-up of the stump secondary to poor blood supply. Proximal duodenojejunostomy is advised for the safe management of patients with difficult duodenal stumps. Roux-en-Y choledochojejunostomy and duodenojejunostomy divert bile and food in the treatment of the complicated duodenal diverticulum. The suspensory ligament may be transected with impunity. It should be ligated before being sectioned so that bleeding from small vessels contained within can be avoided. Failure to sever the suspensory muscle completely, which is possible if the insertion is multiple, fails to relieve the symptoms of vascular compression of the duodenum (Fig. 18). Mobilization, resection, and end-to-end anastomosis of the duodenal flexure have been performed as a uniform surgical procedure, avoiding the conventional gastrojejunostomy. With a large, penetrating posterior duodenal or pyloric ulcer, surgeons should remember that The proximal duodenum shortens because of the inflammatory process (duodenal shortening) The anatomic topography of the distal common bile duct and the opening of the duct of Santorini and the ampulla of Vater is distorted Leaving the ulcer in situ is wise Careful palpation for or visualization of the location of the ampulla of Vater or common bile duct exploration with a catheter insertion into the common bile duct and the duodenum are useful procedures In most cases, the common bile duct is located to the right of the gastroduodenal artery at the posterior wall of the first part of the duodenum. (ABSTRACT TRUNCATED)

Periampullary diverticula and pancreaticobiliary disease

BACKGROUND

Periampullary diverticula (PAD) are extraluminal outpouchings of the duodenum arising within a radius of 2-3 cm from the ampulla of Vater. They are frequently encountered in elderly patients undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and contribute to failure of ERCP. This review details the relationship of PAD to pancreaticobiliary disease and the influence of PAD on the management of patients.

METHODS

The United States National Library of Medicine Medline database was searched for articles on and related to PAD published in English within the past 15 years. Major earlier works were also reviewed.

RESULTS

The prevalence of PAD increases with age and could be as high as 27 per cent. PAD are associated with an incompetent sphincter of Oddi and colonization of bile duct with beta-glucuronidase-producing organisms. PAD are implicated in the pathogenesis of pigment common bile duct stones, but there is no conclusive evidence to associate them with cholecystolithiasis or pancreatitis. PAD are a major cause of failure of ERCP, but success rates of more than 90 per cent have been achieved in specialist centres.

CONCLUSION

With an ageing population, there will be an increase in elderly patients with PAD and symptomatic pancreaticobiliary disease. Continuing improvements in radiological and endoscopic techniques should enable this vulnerable group to be treated effectively and safely.