Segments I and IV resection as a new approach for hepatic hilar cholangiocarcinoma

Parenchyma-preserving hepatectomy including segments I + IV resection and bile duct resection in a patient with type IV perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: A case report with video clip

It has been reported that parenchyma-preserving hepatectomy (PPH) might lower surgical curability with an increased likelihood of bile duct resection margins (BDRMs). Apparently, PPH is indicated for patients expected to achieve curative resection. The author herein presents a case of a 77-year-old male patient with type IV perihilar cholangiocarcinoma and decreased cardiac function treated with hepatic segments I + IV resection and bile duct resection. During the operation, he underwent two hepatic parenchymal transections matched with right trisectionectomy and left hepatectomy. After removing segments VI and I and extrahepatic bile duct, six hepatic duct openings were exposed at the left and right hila. As some of them were conjoined, two hepaticojejunostomies at the right liver and one hepaticojejunostomy at the left lateral section were performed consecutively. This operation took 7 hours. Eight sessions of intraoperative frozen-section biopsy were performed. All BDRMs were tumor-negative. According to the 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system, the extent of the tumor was pT2bN2M0. It was regarded as stage IVA tumor. The patient recovered uneventfully. He was discharged on the 18th postoperative day. The patient underwent concurrent chemoradiation therapy and adjuvant chemotherapy. The patient has been doing well without tumor recurrence for the past 24 months to date. In conclusion, PPH can lead to curative resection and improved outcomes through reasonable adjustment of the extent of hepatectomy.

Standard and modified techniques for parenchyma-preserving hepatectomy focused on segments I+IV resection in patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma

Resection of the hepatic segments I+IV (S1+S4) is the most common type of parenchyma-preserving hepatectomy (PPH) for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHCC). The author describes personal experience on the standard and modified techniques for PPH focused on S1+S4 resection in patients with PHCC. 1) Isolated caudate lobectomy with bile duct resection (BDR) is the minimal type of PPH, but not currently recommended due to technical difficulty. 2) Partial hepatectomy of S1+S4a±segment V (S5) with BDR provides wide operative field, but extension of BDR is limited and resection of S1 paracaval portion is still difficult. 3) Resection of S1+S4+S5 with BDR provides wider operative field for complete S1 resection and multiple biliary reconstruction. 4) Resection of S1+S4 with BDR offers very wide operative field and allows wider extent of hilar BDR, and thus presents the most common type of PPH. A supplementary video clip presents the detailed standard surgical procedure for resection of S1+S4 with BDR in a patient with type IIIA PHCC. 5) Modified resection of S1+S4±S5 or segment VIII (S8) with BDR facilitates additional resection of tumor-involved S5 or S8 ducts. 6) Major hilar vascular invasion is usually contraindicated for PPH and only small portal vein invasion requiring wedge resection and patch venoplasty is allowed. In conclusion, PPH can achieve curative resection and improved outcomes in patients with PHCC via reasonable modification of the extent of hepatectomy and hilar BDR. PPH may have advantages in selected patients depending on the extent of tumor, and in patients with high operative risk.

The impact of caudate lobe resection on margin status and outcomes in patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma: a multi-institutional analysis from the US Extrahepatic Biliary Malignancy Consortium

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to determine the impact of caudate resection on margin status and outcomes during resection of extrahepatic hilar cholangiocarcinoma.

METHODS

A database of 1,092 patients treated for biliary malignancies at institutions of the Extrahepatic Biliary Malignancy Consortium was queried for individuals undergoing curative-intent resection for extrahepatic hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Patients who did versus did not undergo concomitant caudate resection were compared with regard to demographic, baseline, and tumor characteristics as well as perioperative outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 241 patients underwent resection for a hilar cholangiocarcinoma, of whom 85 underwent caudate resection. Patients undergoing caudate resection were less likely to have a final positive margin (P = .01). Kaplan-Meier curve of overall survival for patients undergoing caudate resection indicated no improvement over patients not undergoing caudate resection (P = .16). On multivariable analysis, caudate resection was not associated with improved overall survival or recurrence-free survival, although lymph node positivity was associated with worse overall survival and recurrence-free survival, and adjuvant chemoradiotherapy was associated with improved overall survival and recurrence-free survival.

CONCLUSION

Caudate resection is associated with a greater likelihood of margin-negative resection in patients with extrahepatic hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Precise preoperative imaging is critical to assess the extent of biliary involvement, so that all degrees of hepatic resections are possible at the time of the initial operation.

Major hepatectomy in Bismuth types I and II hilar cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Historically, hilar bile duct resection (HBDR) has been regarded as the choice of treatment for Bismuth types I and II hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HCCA). The present study aimed to evaluate the advantages of major liver resection (MLR) in the treatment of patients with Bismuth types I and II HCCA when compared with HBDR.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between January 2005 and September 2012, in total, 52 patients with Bismuth types I and II HCCA who underwent HBDR alone or MLR were included for retrospective analysis. The intraoperative outcomes, postoperative complications, and oncological outcomes including recurrence and overall or disease-free survival rate were compared.

RESULTS

The MLR group had significantly higher curative resection rates compared with the HBDR group (95% versus 62.5%, P = 0.021) and lower tumor recurrence (28% versus 63%, P = 0.049), albeit with longer operating time (395.5 ± 112.7 versus 270.9 ± 98.8, P < 0.001), and higher blood transfusion requirements (70% versus 16%, P < 0.001). MLR resulted in significantly higher overall postoperative morbidity (70% versus 34.4%, P = 0.012), compared with HBDR alone. When restricted to R0 resections for all the procedures, MLR significantly increased the overall postoperative survival rate compared with the HBDR group (P = 0.016); the overall survival rate at 1, 3 y was 68.4% and 60.8% for MLR group and 59.6% and 21.9% for HBDR group, respectively. Also, the disease-free survival rate was significantly higher in patients who underwent MLR, as compared with those who underwent HBDR (53.2% versus 0% at 3 y, P = 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study has shown that MLR results in higher curative resections, fewer recurrences, and increased postoperative survival rate for Bismuth types I and II HCCA as compared with HBDR alone. However, there is a need for well-designed, multicenter studies to be undertaken to better inform a decision on the standard treatment for Bismuth types I and II HCCA.

Liver resection for Bismuth type I and Type II hilar cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

In patients with Bismuth type I and II hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HCCA), bile duct resection alone has been the conventional approach. However, many authors have reported that concomitant liver resection improved surgical outcomes.

METHODS

Between January 2000 and January 2012, 52 patients underwent surgical resection for a Bismuth type I and II HCCA (type I: n = 22; type II: n = 30). Patients were classified into two groups: concomitant liver resection (n = 26) and bile duct resection alone (n = 26).

RESULTS

Bile duct resection alone was performed in 26 patients. Concomitant liver resection was performed in 26 patients (right side hepatectomy [n = 13]; left-side hepatectomy [n = 6]; volume-preserving liver resection [n = 7]). All liver resections included a caudate lobectomy. Patient and tumor characteristics did not differ between the two groups. Although concomitant liver resection required longer operating time (P < 0.001), it had a similar postoperative complication rate (P = 0.764), high curability (P = 0.010), and low local recurrence rate (P = 0.006). Concomitant liver resection showed better overall survival (P = 0.047).

CONCLUSIONS

Concomitant liver resection should be considered in patients with Bismuth type I and II HCCA.

Resection and Drainage of Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma: An 11-Year Experience of a Single Center in Mainland China

The purpose of this study is to provide appropriate approaches for resection and drainage of hilar cholangiocarcinomas. Surgical approaches and postoperative survival rates of the patients were analyzed retrospectively. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year cumulative survival rates for patients who underwent resection were 76.6, 36.2, and 10.6 per cent, which was higher than those of 60, 14.3, and 0 per cent, respectively, in palliative operation. Moreover, the 1-, 3-, and 5-year cumulative survival rates for patients who underwent R0 were 88.9, 44.4, and 13.9 per cent, which was improved compared with those of 36.4, 9.1, and 0 per cent, respectively, in nonR0 resection. In addition, the overall survival time of patients who underwent R0 resection combined with hemihepatectomy and caudate lobe resection was longer than of those who underwent R0 without this extra operation, especially within 3 years after operation. After endoscopic metal biliary endoprothesis for patients who were intolerant of resection, liver function was improved at 2 weeks postoperation and the 1-, 3-, and 5-year cumulative survival rates for these patients were 72.7, 18.2, and 0 per cent, respectively. Treatment should be personalized. Resection is the most efficacious therapy, and negative histologic margins should be achieved in radical operation and “skeletonized” surgical operation is the basic requirement of radical treatment of hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Portal vein resection is beneficial to long-term survival and R0 resection combined with caudate lobe resection and hemihepatectomy is more efficacious for patients with Bismuth-Corlette type III hilar cholangiocarcinoma. The preferred approach of drainage in palliative operation is endoscopic metal biliary endoprothesis, which is more appropriate than tumor resection for the patients who suffer from serious comorbidities.

Aggressive surgical resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma of the left-side predominance: radicality and safety of left-sided hepatectomy

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the clinicopathologic outcomes in patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HC) after left-sided hepatectomy (L-H).

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

L-H is indicated as radical surgery for HC, predominantly involving left hepatic duct. However, several reports have demonstrated that L-H often results in tumor-positive margin and unfavorable prognosis compared with right-sided hepatectomy (R-H).

METHODS

A total of 224 patients with HC underwent surgical resection with curative intent at our institution: L-H for Bismuth-Corlette (B-C) type IIIb tumors in 88 patients (39.3%) including 75 left hemihepatectomies and 13 left trisectionectomies, and R-H mainly for B-C type IIIa and IV tumors in 84 patients (37.5%). In this study, clinicopathologic outcomes and perioperative morbidity and mortality rates after L-H were investigated and compared with those after R-H.

RESULTS

Histologically negative margin (R0) resection was achieved in 56 cases (63.6%) with L-H, similar to the results for R-H (58/84, 69.1%). However, the R0 resection rate in L-H cases with portal vein (PV) resection was lower (11/25, 44.0%), and various types of PV reconstruction were required. Proximal ductal stumps and excisional surface at periductal structures were the most common sites of positive margins. However, when curative resection was achieved, 5-year survival was comparable to that in R-H cases. Furthermore, lower mortality was noted in L-H cases, even with left trisectionectomy. Multivariate analysis indicated curability and hepatic artery resection as independent prognostic factors.

CONCLUSIONS

Since L-H is a safe procedure and represents the only curative resectional option for type IIIb tumor, aggressive surgical resection should be performed even in cases with PV involvement, if R0 resection is possible.

Extent of liver resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

The extent of liver resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HC) remains controversial despite extensive studies. The aim of this study was to determine the safety and efficacy of minor and major hepatectomy, selected by predetermined criteria in patients with HC.

METHODS

From 2000 to 2007, 187 patients with HC were studied prospectively; 138 patients underwent resection with curative intent. Minor hepatectomy was performed in 93 patients with Bismuth-Corlette type I, II or III HC without hepatic arterial or portal venous invasion, and major hepatectomy in 45 patients with type III HC with hepatic arterial or portal venous invasion, or type IV HC.

RESULTS

Overall mortality and morbidity rates were 0 and 29.7 per cent respectively, and the bile leak rate was 1.4 per cent. Actuarial 1-, 3- and 5-year survival rates were 87, 54 and 34 per cent respectively in the minor liver resection group, and 80, 42 and 27 per cent for major resection (P = 0.300).

CONCLUSION

Minor liver resection for HC, selected by predetermined criteria, had good results. Major liver resection, which had a higher operative morbidity rate than minor resection, should be reserved for Bismuth-Corlette type III HC with vascular invasion, or type IV HC.

Clinical significance of biliary vascular anatomy of the right liver for hilar cholangiocarcinoma applied to left hemihepatectomy

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the influence of confluence pattern of the right posterior sectional bile duct (RPSBD) on clinocopathological outcome in patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma who underwent left hemihepatectomy (LH).

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Biliary vascular anatomy may affect the cutting line of proximal bile ducts, especially in case of LH, because of the shorter distance from the sectional ramification to the ductal confluence. However, there were few studies as to the relationship between anatomic variation and clinocopathological outcome.

METHODS

A total of 209 patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma underwent surgical resection. We retrospectively investigated confluence patterns of the RPSBD in relation to the right portal vein (RPV) by preoperative imaging studies in 63 patients who underwent LH, and classified them into 3 groups (supraportal type: the RPSBD runs cranially around the RPV; infraportal type: the RPSBD runs caudally to the RPV; combined type: one segmental duct runs infraraportally and the other supraportally to the RPV). Furthermore, the effects of these variations on clinocopathological outcome were evaluated.

RESULTS

The supraportal type was observed in 53 cases (84.1%), the infraportal type in 8 cases (12.7%), and the combined type in 2 cases (3.2%). Although most of the clinocopathological features were similar between the groups, positive margin of proximal bile duct was significantly lower in the infraportal group, as compared with the supraportal group. Furthermore, it was noted that there was no incidence of bilioenteric anastomotic leakage in the infraportal group.

CONCLUSIONS

Negative proximal margin and secure reconstruction were more easily achieved in the infraportal group than in the supraportal group. Preoperative evaluation of confluence pattern of RPSBD may be clinically useful for the management of hilar cholangiocarcinoma when applied to left-sided hepatectomy.

Risk factors of liver dysfunction after extended hepatic resection in biliary tract malignancies

BACKGROUND

Postoperative hepatic insufficiency is a critical complication after extended hepatic resection in patients with biliary tract malignancies, the majority of whom suffer from obstructive jaundice. The aim of this study was to assess clinical parameters linked to this type of liver dysfunction.

METHODS

A total of 111 patients were retrospectively reviewed. Patient background, pre- and intraoperative parameters, and a ratio of remnant liver volume/entire liver volume (RLV/ELV) as a volumetric parameter were compared between patients with and without postoperative hyperbilirubinemia and subsequent fatal outcome.

RESULTS

Logistic regression indicated that only RLV/ELV ratio was an independent factor influencing postoperative hyperbilirubinemia, and RLV/ELV ratio and indocyanine green retention rate at 15 minutes (ICG-R15) were factors affecting survival. Patients with RLV/ELV less than 40% had 7.6 times the risk of postoperative hyperbilirubinemia, while no patients with RLV/ELV greater than 40% and ICG-R15 less than 25% died of liver failure.

CONCLUSIONS

The RLV/ELV ratio was the factor with the greatest impact on liver dysfunction after extended hepatectomy in patients with biliary tract malignancies.

Radical surgery of left-sided klatskin tumors

Left-sided cholangiocarcinoma includes hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HC), predominantly involving the left hepatic duct, and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) in the left liver. Left hepatectomy, or left hepatic trisectionectomy, is indicated as radical surgery of left-sided HC or ICC with or without hilar bile duct invasion. Left lateral sectionectomy, or left medial sectionectomy, is performed for the small mass-forming type ICC. Left hepatic trisectionectomy is indicated for left-sided HC with further cancer progress along the right anterior sectional duct or left-sided ICC involving the right anterior section over the middle hepatic vein and/or the right anterior pedicle. Combined caudate lobe and extrahepatic bile duct resection are mandatory in cases of HC or ICC involving the hepatic confluence. Preoperative biliary drainage should be performed not only for jaundiced patients but also for non-icteric patients with right-sided biliary dilatation of the future remnant liver. Preoperative left trisegment portal vein embolization after biliary drainage of the right posterior section should be carried out prior to left hepatic trisectionectomy. Left hepatectomy has been used as a radical and safer surgical procedure, but in European countries has still been associated with higher morbidity and about 10% operative mortality. Japanese surgeons have had no hospital deaths after carrying out left hepatic trisectionectomy done after preoperative biliary drainage followed by left trisegment portal vein embolization to increase safety and to prolong postoperative survival for patients with locally advanced left-sided cholangiocarcinoma.

Diagnosis and initial management of cholangiocarcinoma with obstructive jaundice

Cholangiocarcinoma is the second most common primary hepatic cancer. Despite advances in diagnostic techniques during the past decade, cholangiocarcinoma is usually encountered at an advanced stage. In this review, we describe the classification, diagnosis, and initial management of cholangiocarcinoma with obstructive jaundice.

Extensive hilar bile duct resection using a transhepatic approach for patients with hepatic hilar bile duct diseases

BACKGROUND

Extensive hilar bile duct resection beyond the second- or third-order intrahepatic biliary radicals is usually required for patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma as well as those with benign inflammatory stricture. Most hilar cholangiocarcinoma is resected with combined major hepatectomy to obtain free surgical margins. The purpose of this study was to show the surgical procedure and the usefulness of extensive hilar bile duct resection using a transhepatic approach for patients with hilar bile duct diseases.

METHODS

Five patients with hepatic hilar bile duct disease and who were unfit for major hepatectomy for several reasons underwent extensive hilar bile duct resection by way of a transhepatic approach. Four of the patients had hilar bile duct cancer, including 1 with mucous-producing bile duct cancer of low-grade malignancy and 1 with a postsurgical benign bile duct stricture.

RESULTS

After extensive hilar bile duct resection, bile duct stumps ranged in number from 3 to 7 mm (mean 4.4). Surgical margins at bile duct stump were free of cancer in all 4 cancer patients. The long-term outcomes were as follows: 3 patients are alive at the time of publication, and 2 patients have died.

CONCLUSIONS

A transhepatic approach may be useful when performing extensive hilar bile duct resection bile duct stricture of biliary disease at the hepatic hilus, especially in high-risk patients who are unfit for major hepatectomy as well as in those having benign bile duct stricture and low-grade malignancy.

Preoperative evaluation with T-staging system for hilar cholangiocarcinoma

AIM: To investigate the clinical value of T-staging system in the preoperative assessment of hilar cholangiocarcinoma.

METHODS: From March 1993 to January 2006, 85 patients who had cholangiocarcinoma diagnosed by operative tissue-biopsy were placed into one of three stages based on the new T-staging system, and it was evaluated the resectability and survival correlated with T-staging.

RESULTS: The likelihood of resection and achieving tumor-free margin decreased progressively with increasing T stage (P < 0.05). The cumulative 1-year survival rates of T1, T2 and T3 patients were 71.8%, 50.8% and 12.9% respectively, and the cumulative 3-year survival rate was 34.4%, 18.2% and 0% respectively; the survival of different stage patients differed markedly (P < 0.001). Median survival in the hepatic resection group was greater than in the group that did not undergo hepatic resection (28 mo vs 18 mo; P < 0.05). The overall accuracy for combined MRCP and color Doppler Ultrasonagraphy detecting disease was higher than that of combined using CT and color Doppler Ultrasonagraphy (91.4% vs 68%; P < 0.05 ). And it was also higher in detecting port vein involvement (90% vs 54.5%; P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION: The proposed staging system for hilar cholangiocarcinoma can accurately predict resectability, the likelihood of metastatic disease, and survival. A concomitant partial hepatectomy would help to attain curative resection and the possibility of long-term survival. MRCP/MRA coupled with color Doppler Ultrasonagraphy was necessary for preoperative evaluation of hilar cholangiocarcinoma.

Recent advance in the treatment of hilar cholangiocarcinoma: hepatectomy with vascular resection

Radical surgical resection has been revealed to be the only hope of cure for the patient with hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Therefore, major efforts have been made to increase the resection rate by surgeons employing combined hepatic resection and vascular resection of the portal vein and the hepatic artery. Especially, the technical feasibility and surgical safety of hepatic resection with combined portal vein resection have recently been reported by several authors. On the other hand, there have been few reports of combined hepatic artery resection in hilar cholangiocarcinoma. There are fears that combined vascular resection with extended hepatectomy for hilar cholangiocarcinoma may lead to high surgical morbidity and mortality. Herein, we describe the results of aggressive surgical approaches in our series, and we also review the outcomes of hepatic resection with combined vascular resection in the previously reported literature.

Combined vascular resection in operative resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: does it work or not?

BACKGROUND

It is still not clear how combined vascular resection affects the outcome of patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Our aim was to evaluate implications of combined vascular resection in patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma by analyzing the outcomes of all patients who underwent operative resection.

METHODS

A total of 161 of 228 consecutive patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma underwent bile duct resection with various types of hepatectomy (88%) and pancreaticoduodenectomy (4%). Combined vascular resection was carried out in 43 patients. Thirty-four patients had portal vein resection alone, 7 patients had both portal vein and hepatic artery resection, and 2 patients had right hepatic artery resection only. The outcomes were compared between the 3 groups: the portal vein resection alone (34), hepatic artery resection (9), and non-vascular resection (118).

RESULTS

Histologically-positive tumor invasion to the portal vein beyond the adventitia was present in 80% of 44 patients undergoing combined portal vein resection. Operative mortality occurred in 11 (7%) patients. The survival rates of the non-vascular resection group were better than that of the portal vein resection alone and the hepatic artery resection groups: 1, 3, and 5 years after curative resection, 72%, 52%, and 41% versus 47%, 31%, and 25% (P < .05), and 17%, 0%, and 0% (P < .0001), respectively. Multivariate analysis showed 4 independent prognostic factors of adverse effect on survival after operation; operative curability, lymph node metastases, portal vein resection, and hepatic artery resection.

CONCLUSIONS

Although both portal vein and hepatic artery resection are independent poor prognostic factors after curative operative resection of locally advanced hilar cholangiocarcinoma, portal vein resection is acceptable from an operative risk perspective and might improve the prognosis in the selected patients, however, combined hepatic artery resection can not be justified.

Current surgical treatment for bile duct cancer

Since extrahepatic bile duct cancer is difficult to diagnose and to cure, a safe and radical surgical strategy is needed. In this review, the modes of infiltration and spread of extrahepatic bile duct cancer and surgical strategy are discussed. Extended hemihepatectomy, with or without pancreatoduodenectomy (PD), plus extrahepatic bile duct resection and regional lymphadenectomy has recently been recognized as the standard curative treatment for hilar bile duct cancer. On the other hand, PD is the choice of treatment for middle and distal bile duct cancer. Major hepatectomy concomitant with PD (hepatopancreatoduodenectomy) has been applied to selected patients with widespread tumors. Preoperative biliary drainage (BD) followed by portal vein embolization (PVE) enables major hepatectomy in patients with hilar bile duct cancer without mortality. BD should be performed considering the surgical procedure, especially, in patients with separated intrahepatic bile ducts caused by hilar bile duct cancer. Right or left trisectoriectomy are indicated according to the tumor spread and biliary anatomy. As a result, extended radical resection offers a chance for cure of hilar bile duct cancer with improved resectability, curability, and a 5-year survival rate of 40%. A 5-year survival rate has ranged from 24% to 39% after PD for middle and distal bile duct cancer.

Surgery for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: feasibility and results of parenchyma-conserving liver resection

BACKGROUND/AIM

Major liver resection has improved the resectability rate of hilar cholangiocarcinomas, but morbidity and mortality may be significant. The aim of this study was to assess the value of parenchyma-conserving liver resection (resection of bile duct with liver segments I and IVb; PCLR) in hilar cholangiocarcinoma.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data. Factors influencing survival following three types of operations were studied by univariate and multivariate analyses. The three types of operations were: (1) local resection of the bile duct alone (LR); (2) major liver resection (resection of three or more segments, hepatic resection; HR), and (3) PCLR.

RESULTS

Forty-six patients (21 males, 25 females; age range 35-77 years, mean age 57, median age 57 years) underwent surgery. There were 11 LR, 12 HR, and 23 PCLR procedures. There were 3 deaths (mortality 6.5%). The mortality was higher following HR (3 out of 12; 25%) than following LR or PCLR (0 out of 34; p = 0.01). Survival was longer following curative resection (median 27 months) than after palliative resection (median 15 months; p = 0.001). Lymph nodal and perineural involvement were adverse factors on univariate, but not on multivariate analysis. PCLR produced better survival (median 29 months) as compared with LR (median 15 months) or HR (median 22.5 months; p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

PCLR is applicable to selected patients with Bismuth-Corlette type III disease without major vascular involvement and produces survival rates comparable to those of LR and HR. PCLR may help avoid major liver resections in some patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma.

Is parenchyma-preserving hepatectomy a noble option in the surgical treatment for high-risk patients with hilar bile duct cancer?

BACKGROUND

The essential minimum of hepatic segmentectomy combined with caudate lobectomy (parenchyma-preserving hepatectomy) has been recommended particularly for high-risk patients with hilar bile duct cancer to minimize the risk of postoperative liver failure. This quality control study investigated whether parenchyma-preserving hepatectomy is a "noble option" in the surgical treatment of hilar bile duct cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 53 patients with hilar bile duct cancer underwent surgical resection. These patients were retrospectively classified into a major hepatectomy group (major Hx, n=30), a parenchyma-preserving hepatectomy group (preserving Hx, n=11), and a hilar bile duct resection group (HBDR, n=12). A preserving Hx consisted of caudate lobectomy, either alone (n=3), or combined with resection of segment 4 (S4, n=4), or S58 (n=3) or S458 (n=1). The preserving Hx was used for high-risk patients in whom tumor tissue was diagnosed to be Bismuth type I and II by preoperative selective percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography.

RESULTS

The mean numbers of hepatico-jejunostomies were 2.8, 4.8, and 4.6 in the respective groups. Mortality rates including hospital death were 13.3%, 0%, and 0% respectively. Morbidity rates were 46.7%, 54.5%, and 33.3%. The preserving Hx group encountered no liver failure (T.Bil>10 mg/dl, encephalopathy) but acquired hyperbilirubinemia (T.Bil>5 mg/dl), pulmonary insufficiency and other complications at the same frequency as in the major Hx group. The survival rates in the three groups were 35.6%, 52.5%, and 48.6% at 3 years and 25.2%, 14.9%, and 24.3% at 5 years respectively. Curability rates (R0 to R1+2) were 76.7%, 54.5% and 50.0%, respectively. Preserving Hx tended to result in higher frequencies of positive transmural margins (e.g., cancer cells remaining around the right hepatic artery or the portal vein).

CONCLUSIONS

Preserving hepatectomy for high-risk patients should be limited strictly to patients who do not have tumors which are not invading adjacent organs (e.g., T2) nor a segmental duct and are confined longitudinally to the right or the left.

Cholangiocarcinoma of the extrahepatic bile ducts

Malignancies of the biliary tree, particularly the extrahepatic bile ducts, remain difficult clinical problems. Because experience with these uncommon tumors has been limited to a small number of centers, meaningful clinical trials have been difficult to perform. Complete resection remains the most effective therapy, but is usually possible in the minority of patients. Palliating the effects of biliary obstruction is thus often the primary therapeutic goal. Chemotherapy and radiation therapy have not been proven to reduce the incidence of recurrence after resection nor to improve survival in patients with unresectable disease. This review focuses on cholangiocarcinoma of the extrahepatic bile ducts.

Parenchyma-preserving hepatectomy in the surgical treatment of hilar cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Although extended hepatic resection has been shown to improve prognosis by increasing the surgical curability rate in hilar cholangiocarcinoma, high surgical morbidity and mortality rates have been reported in patients with obstructive jaundice. Postoperative liver failure after hepatic resection in patients with obstructive jaundice has been shown to depend on the volume of the resected hepatic mass. The aim of this study was to evaluate the results of parenchyma-preserving hepatectomy in a surgical treatment for hilar cholangiocarcinoma.

STUDY DESIGN

Ninety-three resected patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma were included in this retrospective study. The resected patients were stratified into three groups: the extended hepatectomy (EXH) group (n = 66), the parenchyma-preserving hepatectomy (PPH) group (n = 14), and the local resection (LR) group (n = 13). The EXH group had undergone hepatectomy more extensive than hemihepatectomy, the PPH group had undergone hepatectomy less extensive than hemihepatectomy, and the LR group had undergone extrahepatic bile duct resection without hepatic resection. Surgical curability, defined by histologically confirmed negative surgical margins, surgical morbidity and mortality, and survival rates were compared among the three groups. The clinicopathologic factors were studied for prognostic value by univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

Surgical curability of the PPH and EXH groups was better than that of the LR group. Fifty-four percent of patients in the LR group showed positive surgical margins at the hepatic stump of the bile duct, compared with 7% in the PPH group and 20% in the EXH groups (p < 0.01 for each comparison). Surgical morbidity was higher in the EXH group (48%) than in the LR group (8%) and the PPH group (14%) (p < 0.01 and p < 0.05, respectively). Postoperative hyperbilirubinemia occurred more frequently in the EXH group (29%) than in the LR and PPH groups (0% and 0%, respectively, p < 0.05 for each comparison). Survival rates after resection were significantly higher in patients who underwent hepatectomy, including PPH and EXH, than in patients who underwent LR, 29% versus 8% at 5 years, respectively (p < 0.05). But no significant difference in survival was found between the PPH and EXH groups. Univariate and multivariate analyses showed that significant prognostic factors for survival were resected margin, lymph nodal status, and vascular resection.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, PPH could obtain a curative resection and improve the outcomes for patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma that is localized at the hepatic duct confluence who do not require vascular resection. PPH might bring about a beneficial effect in highly selected patients according to extent of cancer and high-risk patients with liver dysfunction.

S4a + S5 with caudate lobe (S1) resection using the Taj Mahal liver parenchymal resection for carcinoma of the biliary tract

Recently we have been performing S4a + S5 with total resection of the caudate lobe (S1) by using a dome-like dissection along the root of the middle hepatic vein at the pinnacle, which we refer to as the Taj Mahal liver parenchymal resection, for carcinoma of the biliary tract. This procedure offers the following advantages: (1) It allows total resection of the caudate lobe, including the paracaval portion (S9), and (2) because the cut surface of the liver is large, it allows intrahepatic jejunostomy to be performed more easily with a good field of view. The indications for this procedure include hilar bile duct carcinoma, gallbladder carcinoma, and choledochal cyst (type IVA). Because of the high rate of hilar liver parenchyma and caudate lobe invasion associated with hilar bile duct carcinoma, the liver must be resected. The Taj Mahal procedure is indicated in cases where extended liver resection is impossible. The dissection limits of this procedure are, on the left side, the B2+3 bifurcation at the right margin of the umbilical portion of the portal vein and, on the right side, the B8 of the anterior branch and the B6+7 bifurcation of the right posterior branch. This procedure could also be described as a reduced form of extended right hepatectomy and extended left hepatectomy. For gallbladder carcinoma, this procedure is indicated to ensure an adequate surgical margin and eradicate transvenous liver metastasis, particularly in cases of pT2 lesions. Hilar and caudate lobe invasion also occurs in liver bed-type gallbladder carcinoma, and bile duct resection and caudate lobe resection are required for the surgery to be curative. We performed this procedure in four cases of hilar bile duct carcinoma, five cases of gallbladder carcinoma, and one case each of choledochal cyst (type IVA) with carcinoma of the bile duct and gallbladder adenomyomatosis. Curative resection was possible in all except the patient with adenomyomatosis, and all of the patients are alive and recurrence free 10 to 37 months postoperatively. This procedure, in addition to preserving liver function, provides a wide field of view and facilitates reconstruction of multiple intrahepatic bile ducts. Thus it can be said to be a curative operation not only in patients considered high risk but also in those whose hilar bile duct carcinoma is limited to the bifurcation area (Bismuth type IIIa and IIIb) and in gallbladder carcinoma up to pT2 with slight extension on the hepatic side.