Angiographic embolization for arrest of bleeding after penetrating trauma to the abdomen

American Association for the Surgery of Trauma-World Society of Emergency Surgery guidelines on diagnosis and management of abdominal vascular injuries

Abdominal vascular trauma accounts for a small percentage of military and a moderate percentage of civilian trauma, affecting all age ranges and impacting young adult men most frequently. Penetrating causes are more frequent than blunt in adults, while blunt mechanisms are more common among pediatric populations. High rates of associated injuries, bleeding, and hemorrhagic shock ensure that, despite advances in both diagnostic and therapeutic technologies, immediate open surgical repair remains the mainstay of treatment for traumatic abdominal vascular injuries. Because of their devastating nature, abdominal vascular injuries remain a significant source of morbidity and mortality among trauma patients. The American Association for the Surgery of Trauma in conjunction with the World Society of Emergency Surgery seek to summarize the literature to date and provide guidelines on the presentation, diagnosis, and treatment of abdominal vascular injuries. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Review study, level IV.

Cone-beam computed tomography for trauma

Radiographic imaging is critical in helping guide treatment of critically injured patients. Cone-beam computed tomography is an axial imaging technique available from fixed imaging systems found in hybrid operating rooms. It can be used to provide focused studies of specific anatomical regions, where patients cannot undergo conventional multidetector computed tomography. This includes non-contrast-enhanced evaluation of the intracranial contents and vascular imaging throughout the body. There are a number of advantages and disadvantages to cone-beam computed tomography, but these are not widely discussed within the trauma literature. This narrative review article presents the initial practical experience of this novel imaging modality. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Review article, level III.

Replaced right hepatic artery pseudoaneurysm managed with coil embolisation

A 20-year-old male patient presented to our emergency surgery department with blunt trauma to the abdomen and in a state of shock. The patient was resuscitated and a Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography (CECT) was done which showed a grade 2 liver injury involving segment VIII. The patient was managed conservatively and discharged after 8 days. The patient again presented after 3 weeks with severe anaemia, fever and melena. An upper gastrointestinal endoscopy revealed bile mixed with blood at the ampulla of Vater, consistent with haemobilia. CT angiography showed grade 2 injury of the liver with large haematoma in segment VIII. A large right subcapsular collection, a saccular area consistent with pseudoaneurysm of the replaced right hepatic artery arising from the superior mesenteric artery, was seen. A replaced left hepatic artery arising from the left gastric artery was also observed. The patient underwent right hepatic artery coil embolisation, with postprocedure digital subtraction scan showing no extravasation of contrast. The patient recovered well in the follow-up.

Vascular trauma

Last century saw a marked increase in vascular injuries and their treatment has been improved from the experience gained in the major conflicts in the latter half of the last century. This trend of increasing numbers of vascular injuries has been perpetuated by a rise in civilian violence.

This article reviews the mechanisms, diagnosis and treatment of vascular injury and outlines some of the advances in endovascular techniques for treating vascular trauma.

Abdominal vascular trauma

Abdominal vascular trauma, primarily due to penetrating mechanisms, is uncommon. However, when it does occur, it can be quite lethal, with mortality ranging from 20% to 60%. Increased early mortality has been associated with shock, acidosis, hypothermia, coagulopathy, free intraperitoneal bleeding and advanced American Association for the Surgery of Trauma Organ Injury Scale grade. These patients often arrive at medical centers in extremis and require rapid surgical control of bleeding and aggressive resuscitation including massive transfusion protocols. The most important factor in survival is surgical control of hemorrhage and restoration of appropriate perfusion to the abdominal contents and lower extremities. These surgical approaches and the techniques of definitive vascular repair can be quite challenging, particularly to the inexperienced surgeon. This review hopes to describe the most common abdominal vascular injuries, their presentation, outcomes, and surgical techniques to control and repair such injuries.

Role of Vascular and Interventional Radiology in the Diagnosis and Management of Acute Trauma Patients

Vascular and interventional radiology provides an important service in the diagnosis and management of the acute trauma patient. Historically angiography was used primarily as a diagnostic tool for both vascular and solid organ injuries. However, with technological advances, such as the advent of stents, stent grafts, newer embolization materials and sophisticated delivery devices, micro-catheters, and steerable guide wires, vascular and interventional radiology can now offer definitive treatment in selected cases. Transcatheter embolization can effectively treat acute hemorrhage and is useful in locations that are difficult to access surgically, or when surgical disruption of fascial planes, which may eliminate a tamponade effect, is less desirable. Stents and stent grafts have been used to preserve, rather than sacrifice, an injured blood vessel. In splenic, hepatic, and renal trauma, a trend in nonoperative management has been developed by traumatologists. Transcatheter embolization can increase the success rate of nonoperative management in selected injuries. In general, despite the injury grade, if evidence of ongoing hemorrhage is present, angiography and transcatheter embolization should be considered. Peripheral vascular injuries can be treated with transcatheter embolization or stents and stent grafts. Transcatheter embolization in trauma was first applied to bleeding associated with pelvic fractures and dislocations, and continues to be an important treatment option. Carotid and vertebral artery injuries can now be repaired using stents or stent grafts, although the experience of this treatment strategy is somewhat limited. Likewise, acute traumatic aortic injury has been successfully treated with stent grafts in small series. Conventional catheter thoracic aortography is now used as an adjunctive diagnostic test for indeterminate or questionable findings on noninvasive imaging studies, primarily computed tomography scans of the chest. In summary, vascular and interventional radiology maintains an important role in the diagnosis and management of acute vascular and solid organ injury. The following review illustrates its current status in acute trauma.

The early management of gunshot wounds Part II: the abdomen, extremities and special situations

The management of gunshot wounds of the abdomen and extremities is evolving with centres who treat large volumes of such injuries tending to the application of a policy of selective non-operative management. This article discusses the management of gunshot wounds to the abdomen and extremities and reviews the evidence supporting these changing practices. Special situations such as wounding by shotguns or air rifles are also examined as are the special considerations needed when dealing with the gunshot injured pregnant women or in a child.

Multidetector CT for Penetrating Torso Trauma: State of the Art

The use of computed tomography (CT) for hemodynamically stable victims of penetrating torso trauma continues to increase but remains less singular to the work-up than in blunt trauma. Research in this area has focused on the incremental benefits of CT within the context of evolving diagnostic algorithms and in conjunction with techniques such as laparoscopy, endoscopy, and angiographic intervention. This review centers on the current state of multidetector CT as a triage tool for penetrating torso trauma and the primacy of trajectory evaluation in diagnosis, while emphasizing diagnostic challenges that have lingered despite tremendous technological advances since CT was first used in this setting 3 decades ago. As treatment strategies have also changed considerably over the years in parallel with advances in CT, current management implications of organ-specific injuries depicted at multidetector CT are also discussed.

MDCT of complications and common postoperative findings following penetrating torso trauma

Victims of penetrating torso trauma often present with findings that necessitate emergent exploratory laparotomy, precluding scanning with multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) until the postoperative period. This article reviews the wide range of complications as well as expected findings that may be encountered at MDCT performed postoperatively. Little has been written to guide the radiologist in interpreting these often complex and potentially confusing studies.

Angiographic embolization for major trauma in a low-middle income healthcare setting--A retrospective review

INTRODUCTION

Interventional radiology (IR) provides a range of adjunctive techniques to assist with hemorrhage control after trauma that can be employed pre- or post-operatively. The role of IR in lower-middle income countries (LMICs) remains unexplored. This study describes the use of adjunctive angioembolization (AE) in severely injured patients following its recent implementation at an urban trauma center in a LMIC.

METHODS

Adult patients (≥ 16 years) requiring AE from 2011 to 2013 at a single trauma-care facility were included. Data was collected on demographic parameters, transfer status, injury severity score (ISS), emergency resuscitation characteristics, AE and operative characteristics, complications, and in-hospital mortality. Descriptive analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Thirty six patients underwent AE for trauma-related hemorrhagic complications and were included in the study. Average age was 31.5 (± 11.3) years with a male preponderance (91.7%). Penetrating trauma (61.1%) was the most common type of injury. The primary mechanism of injury was gunshot (58.3%). The median ISS was 24 (IQR: 20-29). Pre-operative AE was performed in 23 (63.9%) patients and these patients had a lower median ISS (22) than those who underwent post-operative AE (p = 0.015). Hepatic (55.6%) and pelvic (33.3%) trauma more commonly required radiological intervention. Bleeding from the right hepatic (n = 14), and the right internal iliac (n = 6) arteries and/or their branches, were more often embolized. Microcoils were the preferred AE agents (61.1%). Median length of hospital stay was 7.5 (IQR: 3-14) days. Eight (22.2%) patients did not survive.

CONCLUSION

With the availability of multi-detector computed tomography and a dedicated interventional radiology suite, implementation of AE for the care of trauma patients in LMIC settings is possible.

The role of endovascular treatment of pelvic fracture bleeding in emergency settings

PURPOSE

To evaluate the role of endovascular treatment for controlling haemorrhage in haemodynamically unstable patients with pelvic bone fractures and to relate clinical efficacy to pre-procedural variables.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From March 2009 through April 2013, 168 patients with major pelvic trauma associated with high-flow haemorrhage were referred to our emergency department and were retrospectively reviewed. Pelvic arteries involved were one or more per patient. Embolisation was performed using various materials (micro-coils, Spongostan, plug, glue, covered stent), and technical success, complications, treatment success, clinical efficacy, rebleeding, and mortality rates were assessed. Factors influencing clinical efficacy were also evaluated.

RESULTS

The technical success rate was 100%; no complications occurred during the procedures. Treatment was successful in 94.6% cases, and clinical efficacy was 85.7%. Three patients had to undergo a second arteriography due to recurrent haemorrhage. Fifteen patients died. Pre-embolisation transfusion demand was significantly associated with clinical efficacy.

CONCLUSIONS

Percutaneous embolisation of pelvic bleeding may be considered a safe, effective, and minimally invasive therapeutic option. As haemodynamic stability is the first objective with traumatic haemorrhagic patient, arterial embolisation can assume a primary role. On the basis of our results, pre-procedural transfusion status may be considered a prognostic factor.

KEY POINTS

• The series presented is one of the largest in a single centre. • Arterial embolisation is a life-saving procedure in patients with pelvic haemorrhage. • In pelvic traumas associated with haemorrhage, prognosis is dependent upon prompt treatment. • Transfusion status is significantly related to clinical efficacy.

The contemporary management of penetrating splenic injury

INTRODUCTION

Selective non-operative management (NOM) is standard of care for clinically stable patients with blunt splenic trauma and expectant management approaches are increasingly utilised in penetrating abdominal trauma, including in the setting of solid organ injury. Despite this evolution of clinical practice, little is known about the safety and efficacy of NOM in penetrating splenic injury.

METHODS

Trauma registry and medical record review identified all consecutive patients presenting to LAC+USC Medical Center with penetrating splenic injury between January 2001 and December 2011. Associated injuries, incidence and nature of operative intervention, local and systemic complications and mortality were determined.

RESULTS

During the study period, 225 patients experienced penetrating splenic trauma. The majority (187/225, 83%) underwent emergent laparotomy. Thirty-eight clinically stable patients underwent a deliberate trial of NOM and 24/38 (63%) were ultimately managed without laparotomy. Amongst patients failing NOM, 3/14 (21%) underwent splenectomy while an additional 6/14 (42%) had splenorrhaphy. Hollow viscus injury (HVI) occurred in 21% of all patients failing NOM. Forty percent of all NOM patients had diaphragmatic injury (DI). All patients undergoing delayed laparotomy for HVI or a splenic procedure presented symptomatically within 24h of the initial injury. No deaths occurred in patients undergoing NOM.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the vast majority of penetrating splenic trauma requires urgent operative management, a group of patients does present without haemodynamic instability, peritonitis or radiologic evidence of hollow viscus injury. Management of these patients is complicated as over half may remain clinically stable and can avoid laparotomy, making them potential candidates for a trial of NOM. HVI is responsible for NOM failure in up to a fifth of these cases and typically presents within 24h of injury. Delayed laparotomy, within this limited time period, did not appear to increase mortality nor preclude successful splenic salvage. In clinically stable patients, diagnostic laparoscopy remains essential to evaluate and repair occult DI. As NOM for penetrating abdominal trauma becomes more common, multi-centre data is needed to more accurately define the principles of patient selection and the limitations and consequences of this approach in the setting of splenic injury.

Guidelines on the use of gelatin sponge particles in embolotherapy

Gelatin sponge (GS) is one of the most widely used embolic agents in interventional procedures. There are four commercially available GS products in Japan; however, the endovascular use of Gelfoam and Spongel is off-label, and Gelpart can only be used for hepatic artery embolization and Serescue can only be used for hemostasis of arterial bleeding. GS has been used for a variety of clinical indications, mainly tumor embolization and stopping massive arterial bleeding. The optimal size and preparation procedure of GS particles differs slightly for each clinical indication. In addition, there is a risk of ischemic and/or infectious complications associated with GS embolization in various situations. Therefore, radiologists should be familiar with not only the preparation and handling of GS particles, but also the disadvantages and potential risks, in order to perform GS embolization safely and effectively.

Non-operative management of hepatic trauma and the interventional radiology: an update review

The growing trend to manage hepatic injuries nonoperatively has been increasing demand for advanced endovascular interventions. This brings up the necessity for general and trauma surgeons to update their knowledge in such matter. Effective treatment mandates a multispecialty team effort that is usually led by the trauma surgeon and includes vascular surgery, orthopedics, and, increasingly, interventional radiology. The focus on hemorrhage control and the angiographer's unique access to vascular structures gives interventional radiology (IR) an important and increasingly recognized role in the treatment of patients with hemodynamic instability. Our aim is to review the basic concepts of IR primarily in hepatic trauma and secondarily in some other special situations. A liver vascular anatomy review is also needed for better understanding the roles of IR. As a final point we propose a guideline for the operative/nonoperative management of traumatic hepatic injuries. The benefit of multidisciplinary approach (TAE) appears to be a powerful weapon in the medical arsenal against the high mortality of injured trauma liver patients.

[Abdominal vascular lesions]

Abdominal vascular lesions are amongst the most lethal lesions suffered by patients with multiple injuries, as well as being among the most difficult and challenging for the surgeon. They are rarely isolated, they are usually found with associated multiple injuries, which increases its seriousness and the time required to repair them and may lead to a significant morbidity and mortality. The correct management involves an early diagnosis and surgical approach.

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging of active bleeding associated with hepatic and splenic trauma

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) imaging of active bleeding from hepatic and splenic trauma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Three hundred and ninety-two patients with liver or/and spleen trauma (179 liver and 217 spleen injuries), who underwent CEUS examinations following contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT), were enrolled in this retrospective study over a period of >4 years. CEUS detected contrast medium extravasation or pooling in 16% (63/396) of liver or spleen lesions in 61 patients, which was confirmed by contrast-enhanced CT. Special attention was paid to observing the presence, location, and characteristics of the extravasated or pooled contrast medium.

RESULTS

The CEUS detection rate for active bleeding was not different from that of contrast-enhanced CT (p=0.333). Information from surgery, minimally invasive treatment and conservative treatment was used as reference standard, and the sensitivities of the two techniques were not different (p=0.122). Of 63 lesions in 61 patients, CEUS showed that 74.6% (47/63) (21 liver lesions and 26 spleen lesions) presented contrast medium extravasation or pooling, both in the organ and out the capsule, in 14.3% (9/63) and only outside the capsule in 11.1% (7/63). CEUS imaging of active bleeding from hepatic and splenic trauma presented various characteristics, and the sizes and shapes of the active bleeding due to contrast medium extravasation or pooling were variable.

CONCLUSIONS

CEUS can show the active bleeding associated with hepatic and splenic trauma with various imaging characteristics, thus making it possible to diagnose active bleeding using CEUS.

Tratamento endovascular de hemorragia pélvica após trauma fechado: desafio terapêutico

Paciente de 16 anos do sexo masculino sofreu trauma pélvico fechado, seguido de formação de abscesso do músculo psoas e outras complicações infecciosas. Submetido a drenagem do abscesso retroperitonial onde foi encontrado extenso sangramento. A hemorragia foi contida com compressas. Após abordagem endovascular por embolização dos ramos da artéria hipogástrica, houve cessação da hemorragia, as compressas foram retiradas e o paciente recebeu alta do hospital sem complicações.

Angiography and embolisation for solid abdominal organ injury in adults - a current perspective

Over the past twenty years there has been a shift towards non-operative management (NOM) for haemodynamically stable patients with abdominal trauma. Embolisation can achieve haemostasis and salvage organs without the morbidity of surgery, and the development and refinement of embolisation techniques has widened the indications for NOM in the management of solid organ injury. Advances in computed tomography (CT) technology allow faster scanning times with improved image quality. These improvements mean that whilst surgery is still usually recommended for patients with penetrating injuries, multiple bleeding sites or haemodynamic instability, the indications for NOM are expanding.

We present a current perspective on angiography and embolisation in adults with blunt and penetrating abdominal trauma with illustrative examples from our practice including technical advice.

Practice management guidelines for selective nonoperative management of penetrating abdominal trauma

BACKGROUND

: Although there is no debate that patients with peritonitis or hemodynamic instability should undergo urgent laparotomy after penetrating injury to the abdomen, it is also clear that certain stable patients without peritonitis may be managed without operation. The practice of deciding which patients may not need surgery after penetrating abdominal wounds has been termed selective management. This practice has been readily accepted during the past few decades with regard to abdominal stab wounds; however, controversy persists regarding gunshot wounds. Because of this, the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma Practice Management Guidelines Committee set out to develop guidelines to analyze which patients may be managed safely without laparotomy after penetrating abdominal trauma. A secondary goal of this committee was to find which diagnostic adjuncts are useful in the determination of the need for surgical exploration.

METHODS

: A search of the National Library of Medicine and the National Institutes of Health MEDLINE database was performed using PubMed (www.pubmed.gov).

RESULTS

: The search retrieved English language articles concerning selective management of penetrating abdominal trauma and related topics from the years 1960 to 2007. These articles were then used to construct this set of practice management guidelines.

CONCLUSIONS

: Although the rate of nontherapeutic laparotomies after penetrating wounds to the abdomen should be minimized, this should never be at the expense of a delay in the diagnosis and treatment of injury. With this in mind, a routine laparotomy is not indicated in hemodynamically stable patients with abdominal stab wounds without signs of peritonitis or diffuse abdominal tenderness. Likewise, it is also not routinely indicated in stable patients with abdominal gunshot wounds if the wounds are tangential and there are no peritoneal signs. Abdominopelvic computed tomography should be considered in patients selected for initial nonoperative management to facilitate initial management decisions. The majority of patients with penetrating abdominal trauma managed nonoperatively may be discharged after 24 hours of observation in the presence of a reliable abdominal examination and minimal to no abdominal tenderness. Diagnostic laparoscopy may be considered as a tool to evaluate diaphragmatic lacerations and peritoneal penetration in an effort to avoid unnecessary laparotomy.

Selective non-operative management of solid organ injury following abdominal gunshot wounds

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to evaluate the outcome of patients sustaining a torso gunshot wound with documented solid organ injury. Our hypothesis was that the non-operative management of isolated solid organ injuries is a safe management option for a select group of patients.

METHODS

A retrospective review of a prospectively collected database was conducted to identify all patients sustaining a torso gunshot resulting in a solid organ injury undergoing non-operative management over a 5-year period (12/1999-01/2005). Patient demographics, injury details, diagnostic imaging, outcome and follow-up were reviewed.

RESULTS

Of 644 gunshot wounds to the torso, 144 (22%) underwent non-operative management. Thirteen of these patients (9%) had 16 solid organ injuries (10 liver, 4 kidney and 2 spleen). CT characterisation of the isolated solid organ injury ranged from AAST Grade I-IV. One of 13 patients failed non-operative management and subsequently underwent laparotomy, which was non-therapeutic. Clinical follow-up was available in all patients for an average of 101 days (median 27, range 6-473). The organ salvage rate was 100%.

SUMMARY

In select haemodynamically stable patients without peritonitis able to undergo serial clinical examination, solid organ injury is not a contra-indication to non-operative management. In the appropriate setting, non-operative management of solid organ injury after gunshot wounding is associated with a high rate of success and organ salvage.

Endovascular treatment of lower limb penetrating arterial traumas

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of percutaneous arterial embolization in patients with penetrating peripheral arterial trauma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twelve patients with penetrating peripheral arterial trauma were treated with percutaneous arterial embolization between 2002 and 2007. All injuries were secondary to penetrating stab wounds. Active bleeding (eight patients), recurrent bleeding episodes (one patient), persistent pain and mass (one patient), leg edema, claudication, swelling (one patient), local hyperemia, and pain (one patient) were the presenting symptoms. Microcatheter systems were used for catheterization. We used n-butyl cyanoacrylate mixture as the embolizing agent in all patients.

RESULTS

On angiograms the inferior gluteal artery (one patient), internal pudendal artery (one patient), perforating branch of the profundal femoral artery (six patients), superficial femoral artery (one patient), peroneal artery (two patients), and anterior tibial artery (one patient) were found to be injured. In all patients, the source of arterial bleeding could be reached, and a safe embolization was achieved. Nontarget embolization due to backflow of n-butyl cyanoacrylate mixture was detected in two patients and inguinal hematoma at the puncture site occurred in one patient.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that embolization-particularly n-butyl cyanoacrylate embolization-is technically feasible in patients with penetrating peripheral arterial trauma.

Transcatheter arterial embolization in the management of hemobilia

BACKGROUND

This retrospective analysis evaluated the clinical and radiologic results of transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) in the treatment of significant hemobilia. The imaging findings, embolization technique, complications, and efficacy are described.

METHODS

Thirty-two consecutive patients (21 male, 11 female, age range 8-61 years) who were referred to the radiology department for severe or recurrent hemobilia were treated by TAE. Causes of hemobilia were liver trauma (n = 19; iatrogenic in six and road traffic accident in 13), vasculitis (n = 6), vascular malformations (n = 2), and hepatobiliary tumors (n = 5). Iatrogenic liver trauma was secondary to cholecystectomy in those six patients. Four of five hepatobiliary tumors were inoperable malignant tumors and one was a giant cavernous hemangioma. Arterial embolization was done after placing appropriate catheters as close as possible to the bleeding site. Embolizing materials used were Gelfoam, polyvinyl alcohol particles or steel coils, alone or in combination. Postembolization angiography was performed in all cases to confirm adequacy of embolization. Follow-up color Doppler ultrasound and contrast-enhanced computed tomography was done in all patients.

RESULTS

Ultrasonic, computed tomographic, and angiographic appearances of significant hemobilia were assessed. Angiogram showed the cause of bleeding in all cases. Three patients with liver trauma due to accidents required repeat embolization. Eight patients required surgery due to failed embolization (continuous or repeat bleeding in four patients, involvement of the large extrahepatic portion of hepatic artery in two, and coexisting solid organ injuries in two). Severity of hemobilia did not correlate with grade of liver injury. All 13 patients with blunt hepatic trauma showed the cause of hemobilia in the right lobe. No patient with traumatic hemobilia showed an identifiable cause in the left lobe. There were no clinically significant side effects or complications associated with TAE except one gallbladder infarction, which was noted at surgery, and cholecystectomy was performed with excision of the hepatic artery aneurysm.

CONCLUSION

TAE is a safe and effective interventional radiologic procedure in the nonoperative management of patients who have significant hemobilia.

Critical care issues in the early management of severe trauma

Violent trauma and road traffic injuries kill more than 2.5 million people in the world every year, for a combined mortality of 48 deaths per 100,000 population per year. Most trauma deaths occur at the scene or in the first hour after trauma, with a proportion from 34% to 50% occurring in hospitals. Preventability of trauma deaths has been reported as high as 76% and as low as 1% in mature trauma systems. Critical care errors may occur in a half of hospital trauma deaths, in most of the cases contributing to the death. The most common critical care errors are related to airway and respiratory management, fluid resuscitation, neurotrauma diagnosis and support, and delayed diagnosis of critical lesions. A systematic approach to the trauma patient in the critical care unit would avoid errors and preventable deaths.

[Penetrating injuries to the pelvis]

As criminality and weapon use increase, general and military surgeons are increasingly confronted with penetrating pelvic injuries both at home and on peacekeeping missions. Penetrating injuries to the iliac vascular axis are associated with considerable mortality, and thus the majority of these emergency patients arrive in a state of deep hypovolemic shock. Concomitant bowel injuries are present in one of five cases, resulting in contamination of the damaged area. Surgical options are simple lateral repair, ligation of the veins, temporary shunt insertion, and prosthetic graft interposition in the injured artery. In extremis ligation of the common or external iliac artery may be the only option to save the patient's life. Surgeons must be aware that damage control surgery and related methods may be needed early on to enable patient survival.

[Medical imaging in the management of abdominal trauma]

There is a marked trend toward nonoperative management of abdominal trauma. This has been possible thanks to the advances in imaging and interventional techniques. Computed tomography (CT), angiography, and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) can guide the nonoperative management of abdominal trauma.

Percutaneous transcatheter embolization in arterial injuries of the lower limbs

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of percutaneous transcatheter arterial embolization (PTE) in lower extremity arterial injuries.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

From January 2000 to June 2004, patients who presented with a penetrating trauma of the lower limbs, along with bleeding and with no sign of ischemia or hemodynamic instability, were included in the study. The injuries were embolized by coils and Gelfoam. The efficacy of PTE was defined as its ability to stop bleeding both radiographically and clinically, and its safety was determined by the complication rate.

RESULTS

There were 10 embolizations, which consisted of 5 profundal femoral, 3 superior gluteal, and 2 inferior gluteal artery embolizations. PTE was effective in all patients. There were two inguinal hematomas, which did not require any intervention, and there was a temporary renal function alteration. The mean hospital stay of these patients was 2.67 +/- 0.91 days.

CONCLUSION

PTE may be an effective and safe method of treatment in certain cases with lower limb arterial injuries. However, patients should be selected meticulously by both the vascular surgeon and the interventional radiologist, and PTE should be undertaken only in experienced hands.

Angiographic Embolization for Liver Injuries: Low Mortality, High Morbidity

OBJECTIVE

Angiographic embolization (AE) is a safe and effective method for controlling hemorrhage in both blunt and penetrating liver injuries. Improved survival after hepatic injuries has been documented using a multimodality approach; however, patients still have significant long-term morbidity. This study examines further the role of AE in both blunt and penetrating liver injuries and the outcomes of its use.

METHODS

The medical records of 37 consecutive patients admitted from 1995 to 2002 to a Level I trauma center who underwent hepatic angiography with the intent to embolize were reviewed. Demographic and clinical information including Injury Severity Score, length of stay, mortality, intra-abdominal complications, admission physiologic variables, and the number and type of abdominal operations performed were collected.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven patients underwent hepatic angiography and 26 patients had hepatic embolization performed. Eleven patients underwent early-AE, immediately after computed tomographic scanning, and 15 underwent late-AE, after liver-related operations or later in their hospital course. There was a 27% mortality rate overall. There were 11 liver-related complications in the 26 embolizations. Excluding the early deaths, the associated morbidity was 58%, which included hepatic necrosis, hepatic abscesses, and bile leaks.

CONCLUSION

There is increasing adjunctive use of AE in patients managed both operatively and nonoperatively. Intra-abdominal complications are common in these salvaged patients with severe liver injuries. Those patients that underwent early-AE received significantly fewer blood transfusions and more commonly had sterile hepatic collections. Only 26% of patients required liver-related surgery after AE. Therefore, the integration of AE as an adjunctive modality for patients with high-grade liver injuries is a safe and effective therapeutic option.

A prospective study on the safety and efficacy of angiographic embolization for pelvic and visceral injuries

BACKGROUND

Angiographic embolization (AE) is used with increasing frequency as an alternative to surgery for control of intraperitoneal and retroperitoneal bleeding. There are no prospective studies on its efficacy, safety, and indications.

PATIENTS

From April 1999 to June 2001, patients with abdominal visceral organ injuries or major pelvic fractures sent for AE were prospectively studied. Patients were transported to the angiography suite either because they were hemodynamically unstable ("emergent" angiography) or hemodynamically stable but had injuries likely to bleed ("preemptive" angiography). The efficacy of AE was derived from its ability to control bleeding radiographically and clinically; the safety of AE was determined by the complications related to transport, vascular access, catheter insertion, contrast administration, and tissue necrosis after interruption of blood supply to organs. Predictors of bleeding were identified by comparing patients who showed contrast extravasation on angiography with those who did not by univariate and multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

Of 100 consecutive patients evaluated by angiography for bleeding from major pelvic fractures (n = 65) or solid visceral organ injuries (n = 35), 57 were found to have active contrast extravasation and were embolized, 23 were found to have indirect signs of vascular injury or ongoing hemodynamic instability and were embolized, and 20 had no signs of bleeding and were not embolized. AE was effective and safe in 95% and 94%, respectively, of 80 patients who were embolized. Four patients had recurrent bleeding after AE and five developed AE-related complications. In three of the four patients, bleeding was controlled by repeat AE. In all five patients, the complications were managed with no further sequelae. Three independent factors were predictive of bleeding identified on angiography: age older than 55 years, absence of long-bone fractures, and emergent angiography. The presence of all three independent predictors was associated with a 95% probability of bleeding; however, the probability of bleeding was still 18% when all three independent predictors were absent.

CONCLUSION

AE is highly effective in controlling bleeding caused by abdominal and pelvic injuries and difficult to manage by surgery. Older age, the absence of long-bone fractures, and emergent angiography increase the likelihood of finding active bleeding angiographically. However, there are no clinical characteristics to exclude reliably all patients who are not actively bleeding internally. Because of this and its reasonable safety profile, AE should be offered liberally in patients with selected injuries of the pelvis and abdominal visceral organs.

When to operate on abdominal gunshot wounds

Historically, penetrating abdominal trauma was managed expectantly until the late 19th century. In World War I, with the high mortality and morbidity associated with penetrating abdominal trauma, operative management replaced expectant management. It was soon realized that not all penetrating abdominal injuries required an operation. Since the 1960's, selective nonoperative management of stab wounds to the anterior abdomen has become the standard of care. However, gunshot wounds to the abdomen are still treated by mandatory exploration based on an allegedly high incidence of intra-abdominal injuries and low rate of complications, if laparotomy turns out negative. A number of series have recently surfaced, reporting successful outcomes, while decreasing morbidity and hospital length of stay, with selective non-operative management of gunshot wounds to the abdomen. This review will address the current controversies surrounding selective nonoperative management of gunshot wounds to the abdomen and will present our experience and current approaches.

The need for early angiographic embolization in blunt liver injuries

BACKGROUND

Although nonoperative management of blunt liver injury (BLI) has become standard practice, adjuncts to nonoperative therapy, such as angiographic embolization, have not been well characterized.

METHODS

Patients with BLI were retrospectively identified at our American College of Surgeons-verified Level I trauma center from January 1997 through February 2001. Patients were stratified into four groups: those who received angiographic embolization (AE) as an early intervention when BLI was initially diagnosed (EARLY-AE); those who underwent AE after liver-related operation or later in the hospital course (LATE-AE); those treated with operation only (OR-ONLY); and nonoperative patients who also did not undergo AE (NO-OR).

RESULTS

There were 126 patients with BLI, of whom 94 were NO-OR, 20 were OR-ONLY, 6 had LATE-AE, and 6 had EARLY-AE. The NO-OR group had significantly lower liver Abbreviated Injury Scale scores. Liver Abbreviated Injury Scale scores were not different between the EARLY-AE, LATE-AE, and OR-ONLY groups. Liver-related mortality was not lower for those treated with AE. There was a trend toward lower mortality for just the EARLY-AE group compared with the LATE-AE and OR-ONLY groups (0% vs. 50% and 35%). The number of units of packed red blood cells transfused and the number of liver-related operations were lower in the EARLY-AE compared with the LATE-AE group, but liver-related complications were not different between the EARLY-AE, LATE-AE, or OR-ONLY groups. AE was successful in arresting hemorrhage in 83% of the cases.

CONCLUSION

In this small series, we observed similar morbidity and mortality with AE compared with operative therapy. EARLY-AE did decrease blood use and the number of liver-related operations. AE can be performed on severely injured patients with comparable liver-related mortality and complications. Further study of the timing of and outcomes from AE is needed.

Is contrast as bad as we think? Renal function after angiographic embolization of injured patients

BACKGROUND

Angiographic embolization (AE) is increasingly used to control bleeding after severe trauma. Serious concerns have been raised about the safety of high-volume i.v. contrast in hypotensive, hypovolemic patients.

STUDY DESIGN

In a prospective cohort study, 100 consecutive trauma patients underwent AE for bleeding in the abdomen and pelvis. Serum creatinine (Cr) levels were measured before the procedure and up to 5 days after the procedure. Contrast nephropathy was defined as an increase in Cr levels after AE of more than 25% over the baseline measurement. An average of 248 +/- 59 mL of nonionic, low-osmolality contrast was used in all cases.

RESULTS

Compared with the baseline, no increase in Cr levels after AE was observed among all patients (1.02 +/- 0.24 versus 0.94 +/- 0.26 mg/dL; p = 0.01) or among subgroups of patients who had any of the following risk factors for renal failure: older than 60 years, Injury Severity Score > or = 15, shock on arrival, renal injury, elevated Cr levels (> or = 1.5 mg/dL) before AE, or administration of a high volume of contrast (> 250 mL). Contrast nephropathy developed in five patients by means of mild Cr elevations. In all of these patients, Cr returned to baseline within 5 days of AE. Renal failure requiring hemodialysis developed at 41 and 55 days after AE in two patients with multiple organ failure who eventually died.

CONCLUSIONS

Administration of nonionic contrast during AE causes mild and transient contrast nephropathy in 5% of severely injured patients. Our study adds additional support for the safety of AE for trauma.

Upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage and transcatheter embolotherapy: clinical and technical factors impacting success and survival

PURPOSE

To identify clinical and technical factors influencing the outcome of transcatheter embolotherapy for nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal (GI) hemorrhage and to quantify the impact of successful intervention on patient survival.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review was performed of all patients (n = 163) who underwent arterial embolization for acute upper GI hemorrhage at a university hospital over an 11.5-year period. Clinical success was defined as target area devascularization that resulted in the clinical cessation of bleeding and stabilization of hemoglobin level. The clinical condition of each patient at intervention was defined by history, laboratory examination, and two composite indicator variables. With use of logistic regression, the dependent variable, clinical success, was modeled on two categories of clinical and technical variables. A final model regressed patient survival on clinical success and other clinical variables.

RESULTS

None of the procedural variables analyzed had a significant influence on clinical success. Several clinical variables did impact clinical success, including multiorgan system failure (OR, 0.36; P =.030), coagulopathy (OR, 0.36; P =.026), and bleeding subsequent to trauma (OR, 7.1; P =.040) or invasive procedures (OR, 6.5; P =.009). Regardless of their clinical condition at intervention, patients who underwent clinically successful embolization were 13.3 times more likely to survive than those who had an unsuccessful procedure (CI, 4.54-39.2; P =.000). Nevertheless, patients with multiorgan system failure were 17.5 times more likely to die, independent of the outcome of the procedure (CI, 0.014-0.229; P =.000).

CONCLUSION

Arresting nonvariceal upper GI hemorrhage with transcatheter embolotherapy has a large positive effect on patient survival, independent of clinical condition or demonstrable extravasation at intervention. Aggressive treatment with transcatheter embolotherapy is advisable in patients with acute nonvariceal upper GI hemorrhage.

Damage control surgery--concepts and practice

The results of prolonged and extensive procedures in the critically injured are poor, even in experienced hands. The operating theatre is a hostile and physiologically unfavourable environment for the severely injured patient. Laparotomy for major trauma involves dissipation of heat and massive blood loss requiring replacement. The result is a vicious cycle of hypothermia, acidosis and coagulopathy leading to death from an irreversible physiological insult (62). The damage control concept places surgery as an integral part of the resuscitative process, rather than an end in itself, and recognises that outcomes after major trauma are determined by the physiological limits of the patient, rather than by efforts of anatomical restoration by the surgeon. All those involved in the care of wounded patients should be familiar with this concept and its surgical and logistical implications.