Changing trends in the management of splenic injury

Comparison between level 1 and level 2 trauma centers for the management of splenic blunt trauma

INTRODUCTION

The management of blunt splenic trauma has evolved in the last years, from mainly operative approach to the non-operative management (NOM). The aim of this study is to investigate whether trauma center (TC) designation (level 1 and level 2) affects blunt splenic trauma management.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of blunt trauma patients with splenic injury admitted to 2 Italian TCs, Niguarda (level 1) and San Carlo Borromeo (level 2), was performed, receiving either NOM or emergency surgical treatment, from January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2020. Univariate comparison was performed between the two centers, and multivariate analysis was carried out to find predictive factors associated with NOM and splenectomy.

RESULTS

181 patients were included in the study, 134 from level 1 and 47 from level 2 TCs. The splenectomy/emergency laparotomy ratio was inferior at level 1 TC for high-grade splenic injuries (30.8% for level 1 and 100% for level 2), whose patients presented higher incidence of other injuries. Splenic NOM failure was registered in only one case (3.3%). At multivariate analysis, systolic pressure, spleen organ injury scale (OIS) and injury severity score (ISS) resulted significant predictive factors for NOM, and only spleen OIS was predictive factor for splenectomy (Odds Ratio 0.14, 0.04-0.49 CI 95%, P < .01).

CONCLUSION

Both level 1 and 2 trauma centers demonstrated application of NOM with a high rate of success with some management difference in the treatment and outcome of patients with splenic injuries between the two types of TCs.

Splenic trauma: WSES classification and guidelines for adult and pediatric patients

Spleen injuries are among the most frequent trauma-related injuries. At present, they are classified according to the anatomy of the injury. The optimal treatment strategy, however, should keep into consideration the hemodynamic status, the anatomic derangement, and the associated injuries. The management of splenic trauma patients aims to restore the homeostasis and the normal physiopathology especially considering the modern tools for bleeding management. Thus, the management of splenic trauma should be ultimately multidisciplinary and based on the physiology of the patient, the anatomy of the injury, and the associated lesions. Lastly, as the management of adults and children must be different, children should always be treated in dedicated pediatric trauma centers. In fact, the vast majority of pediatric patients with blunt splenic trauma can be managed non-operatively. This paper presents the World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES) classification of splenic trauma and the management guidelines.

Splenic injury during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a case report with novel management technique

We describe a case of a splenic injury caused by a transsplenic percutaneous nephrostomy tract. The case was completed without incident and the nephrostomy tube was noted to traverse the spleen on routine postoperative imaging. This rare complication was managed by deposition of Gelfoam((R)) pledgets along the transsplenic nephrostomy tract and placement of a ureteral stent. This novel management technique has not been previously described in the literature and was successful in the conservative treatment of the uncommon complication of splenic injury during percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

[Non operative management of blunt splenic trauma in adults]

Nonoperative management of blunt splenic injury allows preservation of the immune function of the spleen while avoiding unnecessary laparotomy. The aim of our study was to evaluate the feasibility and the results of conservative management of adult blunt splenic trauma in the context of a developing country. Nonoperative management was proposed for 52 out of 62 patients with blunt splenic trauma treated at the Casablanca University Hospital, Morocco. Motor vehicle-road accidents (88%) were the most common etiology. Multiple trauma was present in 79% of the cases. 15% of the cases had hemodynamic instability. Ultrasonography was performed in 52 patients; it showed splenic contusion in 45 patients and subcapsular hematoma in 7 patients. CT scan showed splenic contusion in 11 patients. Four cases ultimately required operative management with one death. Of the remaining 48 patients, 45 had an uneventful course with observation, but there were two deaths in the observation group.

Conservative management of splenic injury in the tropics

We undertook this study in order to determine whether the conservative management of splenic injuries is a safe practice in a low-volume tropical hospital. We evaluated 69 consecutive patients with splenic injury prospectively. The outcome measures were morbidity and mortality rates, overall hospital stay and blood transfusion requirements. Spleen preservation was achieved in 85% (59) of cases. Of the 16 patients who underwent splenic surgery, six had splenorraphy (38%). The overall mortality was 4.3% (3) and the deaths were not related to the conservative management. Our findings suggest that not only is the conservative management of splenic injuries safe, but also that the repair of an enlarged spleen (splenorrhaphy) is safe and feasible in tropical hospital settings. The findings in this study provide further evidence that the conservative management of splenic injury in a tropical hospital without computed tomography scan is a safe practice.

Trauma surgeons practice what they preach: The NTDB story on solid organ injury management

BACKGROUND

Recent studies advocate a nonoperative approach for hepatic and splenic trauma. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the literature has impacted surgical practice and, if so, whether or not the overall mortality of these injuries had changed.

METHODS

The American College of Surgeons' National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB 4.0) was analyzed using trauma admission dates ranging from 1994 to 2003. All hepatic and splenic injuries were identified by ICD-9 codes. As renal trauma management has not changed during the study period, renal injuries were included as a control. Nonoperative management (NOM) rates and overall mortality were determined for each organ. Proportions were compared using chi analysis with significance set at p < 0.05.

RESULTS

There were 87,237 solid abdominal organ injuries reported and included: 35,767 splenic, 35,510 hepatic, 15,960 renal injuries. There was a significant (p < 0.00000000005) increase in percentage of NOM for hepatic and splenic trauma whereas renal NOM remained stable for the study period. Despite an increase in NOM for splenic and hepatic injuries, mortality has remained unchanged.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that the management of hepatic and splenic injuries has significantly changed in the past 10 years with no appreciable effect on mortality. NOM has become the standard of care for the management of hepatic and splenic trauma. The NTDB can be used to monitor changes in trauma care in response to new knowledge regarding improved outcomes.

Comparison of structural and hemostatic properties of the poly-N-acetyl glucosamine Syvek Patch with products containing chitosan

Polysaccharides are becoming increasingly developed as therapeutics and medical products, as the new field of Glycomics expands. Glycosaminoglycans that contain N-acetyl glucosamine constituents have been the focus of research leading to medical devices. A new hemostatic bandage, the Syvek Patch, has been introduced in the recent past for the control of bleeding at vascular access sites in interventional cardiology and radiology procedures. This product consists of poly-N-acetyl glucosamine (pGlcNAc) isolated in a unique fiber crystalline structural form from the large-scale culture and processing of a marine diatom. The Syvek pGlcNAc fiber material has chemical, physical, and biological properties that result in its favorable performance as a hemostat. Two new products, the Clo-Sur PAD and ChitoSeal, have recently become available also as patch hemostats. These two products both use chitosan, another N-acetyl glucosamine containing glycosaminoglycan, as their active ingredient. Structural, chemical, and biological comparisons of Syvek pGlcNAc and chitosan reveal a number of important differences. Syvek pGlcNAc fibers contain approximately 50 fully acetylated, high molecular weight pGlcNAc molecules in a crystalline, three-dimensional beta structure array, and are insoluble. Chitosan is a low molecular weight mixed amorphous cationic polymer with no regular structure as a solid, and is water-soluble taking on a random coil configuration when in solution. These structural dissimilarities result in differences in the hemostatic properties of the two materials. Syvek pGlcNAc is able to significantly reduce the in vitro fibrin clot formation time of platelet-rich plasma samples and has the ability to cause aggregation of red blood cells in vitro. Chitosan is no better than gauze or other controls in these in vitro assays. The Syvek Patch is able to control the bleeding and cause hemostasis in a coagulopathic swine spleen-bleeding animal model 100% of the time, whereas Clo-Sur PAD was completely unsuccessful (0%) and ChitoSeal (25%) was worse than a gauze pad control (50%) in the same model. Syvek pGlcNAc fibers have structural and chemical properties that provide a unique basis for their ability to interact with blood components to cause hemostasis. Chitosan does not have the same properties and capabilities.

Tratamento não-operatório e operatório de lesões esplênicas em crianças

OBJETIVO: Comparar dois grupos de pacientes pediátricos com lesões esplênicas sendo um tratado conservadoramente e outro com cirurgia. MÉTODO: Foram avaliadas prospectivamente 32 crianças com lesões esplênicas. Os pacientes foram divididos em dois grupos, Grupo I (tratamento não-operatório, n=16) e Grupo II (tratamento operatório, n=16). O critério para inclusão no tratamento não-operatório foi estabilidade hemodinâmica, escala de coma de Glasgow maior que 12, ausência de lesões associadas de vísceras ôcas. Na avaliação clínica foram verificadas a necessidade de hemotransfusão e de tratamento em Unidade de Terapia Intensiva (UTI). As complicações, tempo de permanência hospitalar,o índice de trauma (RTS, ISS e TRISS) foram analisados. Os exames complementares por imagem foram a ultra-sonografia abdominal seguida de tomografia computadorizada. RESULTADOS: As lesões grau II e III predominaram no Grupo I enquanto as de grau IV e V no Grupo II. As lesões associadas mais freqüentes foram o TCE seguido pelo trauma de extremidades. Com os critérios adotados se obteve total sucesso no tratamento não operatório. CONCLUSÕES: O tratamento não-operatório é uma opção segura para o trauma abdominal fechado com lesão esplênica, desde que seja indicado mediante critérios técnicos explicitados. O tratamento não-operatório da lesão esplênica só pode ser feito em serviços que estejam adequadamente equipados com recursos materiais ( ultra-sonografia e tomografia computadorizada) e com equipe cirúrgica em tempo integral para avaliação continuada dos pacientes.

Functions of the splenic remnant after subtotal splenectomy for treatment of severe splenic injuries

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the clinical and laboratory characteristics of patients submitted to subtotal splenectomy during the immediate and late postoperative period.

METHODS

The study was conducted on 34 patients, 25 of whom were submitted to subtotal splenectomy (group I), and 9 to total splenectomy without preservation of splenic tissue (group II), and on 22 patients with intact spleens (group III, control). The immediate and late postoperative complications were investigated. Hematological examinations were performed during the late postoperative period (red cell count, hemoglobin, platelets, total and segmented leukocytes, lymphocytes, and Howell-Jolly bodies). Immunoglobulins (IgA, IgM, and IgG) and total T lymphocytes (TTL), active T lymphocytes (ATL), and B lymphocytes were also determined. Splenic scintigraphy with (99m)Tc colloidal sulfur was performed.

RESULTS

Groups I and III did not presented abnormal blood bodies and their hematological and immunological pattern were normal. None of the groups showed leukocytosis or thrombocytosis. Howell-Jolly bodies were observed only in group II, which also showed reduced IgM levels. Scintigraphy showed filtering splenic tissue in group I.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that subtotal splenectomy is a good surgical alternative for serious distal spleen lesion or when the main splenic pedicle is injured.

Dexon Mesh Splenorrhaphy for Intraoperative Splenic Injuries

The preferred management option for intraoperative splenic injuries is organ repair and preservation rather than splenectomy given the important immunologic function of the spleen. Wrapping the injured spleen with a Dexon mesh has been shown to be an effective alternative to splenectomy for significant splenic bleeding. However, this technique uses a foreign body that carries a theoretical infectious risk particularly in cases in which the alimentary tract has been opened. This study was undertaken to evaluate whether Dexon mesh splenorrhaphy when used for intraoperative splenic injuries was associated with significant infectious complications. The clinical courses of 23 patients who had Dexon mesh splenorrhaphy performed at a university teaching hospital for intraoperative splenic injury from 1991 to 1999 were reviewed. Eleven patients (48%) had their gastrointestinal tract opened during the surgery. No patients developed an intra-abdominal abscess or required reoperation for bleeding. The most common postoperative complications were left lower lobe atelectasis (18 patients, 78%), postoperative fever (13 patients, 56%), and left pleural effusion (12 patients, 52%). Dexon mesh splenorrhaphy effectively controls splenic bleeding due to intraoperative injury without significant infectious complications.

Nonoperative Management of Solid Abdominal Organ Injuries from Blunt Trauma: Impact of Neurologic Impairment

The role of nonoperative management of solid abdominal organ injury from blunt trauma in neurologically impaired patients has been questioned. A statewide trauma registry was reviewed from January 1993 through December 1995 for all adult (age >12 years) patients with blunt trauma and an abdominal solid organ injury (kidney, liver, or spleen) of Abbreviated Injury Scale score ≥2. Patients with initial hypotension (systolic blood pressure <90 mm Hg) were excluded. Patients were stratified by Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) into normal (GCS 15), mild to moderate (GCS 8–14), and severe (GCS ≤7) impairment groups. Management was either operative or nonoperative; failure of nonoperative management was defined as requiring laparotomy for intraabdominal injury more than 24 hours after admission. In the 3-year period 2327 patients sustained solid viscus injuries; 1561 of these patients were managed nonoperatively (66 per cent). The nonoperative approach was initiated less frequently in those patients with greater impairment in mental status: GCS 15, 71 per cent; GCS 8 to 14, 62 per cent; and GCS ≤7, 50 per cent. Mortality, hospital length of stay, and intensive care unit days were greater in operatively managed GCS 15 and 8 to 14 groups but were not different on the basis of management in the GCS ≤7 group. Failure of nonoperative management occurred in 94 patients (6%). There was no difference in the non-operative failure rate between patients with normal mental status and those with mild to moderate or severe head injuries. Nonoperative management of neurologically impaired hemody-namically stable patients with blunt injuries of liver, spleen, or kidney is commonly practiced and is successful in more than 90 per cent of cases. No differences were noted in the rates of delayed laparotomy or survival between normal, mild to moderately head-injured, and severely head-injured patients.

Estudo funcional tardio do auto-implante esplênico após trauma complexo do baço humano

OBJETIVO: Avaliar as repercussões clínicas e laboratoriais em pacientes submetidos a auto-implantes esplênicos. MÉTODOS: Foram estudados 29 pacientes com lesões graves do baço, 20 que receberam auto-implantes esplênicos (grupo I), nove a esplenectomia total sem preservação de tecido esplênico (grupo II) e 22 pacientes com baços íntegros constituíram o grupo controle (grupo III). Investigaram-se as complicações pós-operatórias imediatas e tardias. No pós-operatório tardio realizaram-se exames hematológicos (hematimetria, hemoglobina, hematócrito, plaquetas, leucócitos globais e segmentados, linfócitos e corpúsculos de Howell Jolly). Dosaram-se as imunoglobulinas (IgA, IgM e IgG) e linfócitos T totais (LTT), linfócitos T ativos (LTA) e linfócitos B. Realizou-se cintilografia esplênica com enxofre coloidal marcado com o 99mTc. RESULTADOS: Em nenhum dos grupos verificou-se leucocitose ou trombocitose. Os corpúsculos de Howell-Jolly foram observados no grupo II e neste grupo a IgM esteve reduzida. A cintilografia mostrou tecido esplênico captante no grupo I. CONCLUSÃO: O auto-implante é uma boa alternativa quando a esplenectomia total for necessária.

The Role of Follow-up Radiographic Studies in Nonoperative Management of Spleen Trauma

The management of splenic injuries has evolved significantly in recent years from an operative to a nonoperative approach in stable patients with blunt abdominal trauma. The management of these patients with serial radiographic studies before hospital discharge remains controversial. We reviewed the management of 90 patients retrospectively who were admitted to our Level II trauma center with splenic injuries secondary to blunt trauma to determine the value of serial radiographic studies. Forty-seven (52%) patients underwent immediate laparotomy. Forty-three (48%) patients were managed conservatively without surgery. All nonoperative patients had an initial CT of the abdomen to evaluate their abdominal injuries. Among the 43 patients managed without surgery 31 had no follow-up radiographic studies. Twelve patients had follow-up studies before discharge. Two of these 12 patients subsequently underwent splenectomy. Both had developed hypotension, tachycardia, and a decreasing hematocrit, which prompted their repeat radiographic studies. Ten patients had no change in their clinical status and showed no significant change in the radiographic injury pattern to the spleen. One patient who was initially managed nonoperatively became hemodynamically unstable with increasing abdominal pain and subsequently underwent splenectomy without follow-up radiographic studies. The remaining 30 patients who had no follow-up studies had no significant change in their clinical abdominal examinations and had no further complications from their splenic injuries. Routine follow-up radiographic evaluations are not necessary in the nonoperative management of stable patients with splenic injuries.

Nonsurgical management of blunt splenic injury: use of CT criteria to select patients for splenic arteriography and potential endovascular therapy

PURPOSE

To determine if contrast material-enhanced spiral computed tomography (CT) can be used to select patients with blunt splenic injuries to undergo arteriographic embolization.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

During a 15-month period, 78 patients who were hemodynamically stable and required no immediate surgery underwent contrast-enhanced spiral CT followed by splenic arteriography. CT scans were assessed for splenic vascular contrast material extravasation or posttraumatic splenic vascular lesions. Medical records were reviewed for splenic arteriographic results and clinical outcome.

RESULTS

There were 25 grade I, 12 grade II, 27 grade III, 12 grade IV, and two grade V splenic injuries. CT showed active contrast material extravasation in seven patients and splenic vascular lesions in 19 patients. At CT, splenic vascular contrast material extravasation was 100% (seven of seven patients) and a posttraumatic splenic vascular lesion was 83% (10 of 12 patients) sensitive on the basis of arteriographic or surgical outcome in predicting the need for transcatheter embolization or splenic surgery. Overall, CT had a sensitivity of 81% (17 of 21 patients), a specificity of 84% (48 of 57 patients), negative and positive predictive values of 92% (48 of 52 patients) and 65% (17 of 26 patients), respectively, and an accuracy of 83% (65 of 78 patients) in predicting the need for splenic injury treatment.

CONCLUSION

Contrast-enhanced spiral CT plays a valuable role in selecting hemodynamically stable patients with splenic vascular injury who may be treated with transcatheter therapy and potentially improves the success rate of nonsurgical management.

[Surgical abstention in closed injuries of the spleen]

Splenic conservation avoids the overwhelming postsplenectomy infection. The high percentage of patients treated by noninvasive procedures would be due to the simple clinical course of splenic trauma and precision of diagnosis, using CT scan. Only clinical evaluation could provide further information on the indications for surgical treatment, as there is no available score regarding the value of CT scan for choosing the therapeutical option. Non-operative management of splenic ruptures should be considered in selected patients in whom hemodynamics is stable and closely monitored.

Overuse of splenic scoring and computed tomographic scans

BACKGROUND

As the most commonly injured abdominal organ in blunt trauma, the management of splenic injury has undergone evolution. The risk of blood transfusions administered in an attempt to save the spleen has lowered the threshold for operation and also expanded the limits for nonoperative management. An in-depth analysis was carried out of risk factors on patients requiring immediate surgery and those who fail non-operative management based on organ injury scaling grading by computed tomographic (CT) scan and operation. The application of nonoperative management in the elderly population and the use of follow-up CT scanning and sonography in the outpatient setting was also examined.

METHODS

Between January of 1991 and June of 1996, 226 consecutive blunt splenic trauma, injured patients at a Level I trauma center were evaluated. All subsequent CT scans and sonograms in the inpatient and outpatient setting were analyzed. The Student's t test, Pearson chi2 analysis with Yates correction, and analysis of variance were used to compare between and among groups.

RESULTS

There were 153 men (67.7%), an average age of 34.8 years, an average Injury Severity Score of 24.4, and 28 deaths (12%). There was a significant difference with respect to Injury Severity Score, Glasgow Coma Scale score, Revised Trauma Score, units of packed red blood cells transfused, length of stay, intensive care unit length of stay, mean splenic injury grade, and cost between patients observed initially and those operated on initially. There was no significant difference in age between the two groups. Of 170 patients, 37 patients (22%) who had an initial CT scan underwent immediate exploratory laparotomy. The remaining 133 patients (78%) had nonoperative management; however, 15 patients (11%) failed the period of observation. Five in this group had a laparotomy secondary to other causes and another six were operated on within 24 hours of their injury for their splenic injury. Thus, only four of the nonoperative management patients (3%) actually failed nonoperative splenic management after 24 hours of injury. There were 100 second CT scans obtained. Three of these patients, who had developed hemodynamic instability, required operation for a bleeding spleen. The subsequent CT scan was confirmatory in these three patients who resided in the intensive care unit. All other CT scans and sonograms for clinically unremarkable patients failed to yield any alteration in care based on the scans.

CONCLUSION

Blunt splenic injured patients can be safely observed; however, there are certain risk factors in those requiring immediate surgery and those failing nonoperative management. The CT scan underestimates injury, possibly related to a progression of bleeding found at the time of operation. No outpatient studies altered the course of management. Age also did not influence outcome. Thus, in the dedicated trauma center, nonoperative management of blunt splenic injury patients does not lead to undue morbidity or mortality. Once discharged, follow-up radiographs in asymptomatic patients are not necessary.

Adult splenic injuries: treatment patterns and predictive indicators

BACKGROUND

With the trend towards conservation in splenic trauma, the ability to identify a group of patients for whom we can safely offer conservative treatment becomes an important factor.

METHODS

Data were reviewed from the trauma register at the Auckland Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand, in an attempt to isolate any predictive factors that may allow more appropriate allocation of treatment modalities in the future. Methods of treatment were determined and the success or failure of conservative management noted. Differences in the demographics, Injury Severity Score (ISS) and computed tomographic (CT) findings were particularly sought.

RESULTS

Over a period of 111 weeks 48 patients were admitted with splenic injuries. Fifteen (31.2%) had immediate splenectomy, 27 (56.2%) were initially treated non-operatively and six (10.1%) died pre-operatively. Of the non-operative group eight (29.6%) failed this management at an average of 4.125 days into their hospital stay. No differences were found in age, mechanism, gender or ISS between the failed and successfully treated group. Using the Buntain classification of CT-graded splenic injury, 13 (87%) who had successful non-operative treatment had a grade II or III compared with six (86%) who failed this management being grade IV.

CONCLUSION

Although these results did not reach statistical significance, by coupling the trends seen together with other work, CT grading of splenic injury is a predictive indicator and does appear to have a role in the early allocation of patients to appropriate treatment plans.

Immune responses of splenectomized trauma patients to the 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine at 1 versus 7 versus 14 days after splenectomy

OBJECTIVES

Pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine is given after emergency splenectomy for trauma to lessen the risk of overwhelming postsplenectomy sepsis. This study was undertaken to determine optimal timing of vaccine administration as determined by serum type-specific polysaccharide antibody concentration titer and functional activity of the resulting antibodies.

METHODS

Fifty-nine consecutive patients undergoing splenectomy after trauma were randomized to receive pneumococcal vaccine postoperatively at 1, 7, or 14 days. Immunoglobulin G serum antibody concentrations against serogroup 4 and serotypes 6B, 19F, and 23F were measured before vaccination and 4 weeks postvaccination. Antibody concentrations were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and functional antibody by opsonophagocytosis. Results were compared with a normal adult control group (n = 12).

RESULTS

Postvaccination enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay immunoglobulin G antibody concentrations for all serogroups and serotypes studied were not significantly different in splenectomized patients and control subjects. Postvaccination functional antibody activity was significantly reduced in early vaccination groups (serotype 6B excepted). However, with the exception of 19F, all titers for the 14-day group approached those of the control subjects (p > 0.05). Fold-increases of opsonophagocytic titers for serogroup 4 and serotypes 6B and 19F showed progressive increases with delay in vaccination. Except for serotype 23F, the number of postsplenectomy patients with opsonophagocytic titers <64 significantly decreased with a delay in vaccination (14 days).

CONCLUSIONS

Postvaccination immunoglobulin G serum antibody concentrations were not significantly different from normal control subjects regardless of the time of vaccination (1, 7, or 14 days). Although concentrations approach normal, functional antibody activity was significantly lower. Better functional antibody responses against the serogroup and serotypes studied seemed to occur with delayed (14-day) vaccination.

Changing patterns in the management of splenic trauma: the impact of nonoperative management

OBJECTIVE

The recognition that splenectomy renders patients susceptible to lifelong risks of septic complications has led to routine attempts at splenic conservation after trauma. In 1990, the authors reported that over an 11-year study period involving 193 patients, splenorrhaphy was the most common splenic salvage method (66% overall) noted, with nonoperative management employed in only 13% of blunt splenic injuries. This report describes changing patterns of therapy in 190 consecutive patients with splenic injuries seen during a subsequent 6-year period (1990 to 1996). An algorithmic approach for patient management and pitfalls to be avoided to ensure safe nonoperative management are detailed.

METHODS

Nonoperative management criteria included hemodynamic stability and computed tomographic examination without shattered spleen or other injuries requiring celiotomy.

RESULTS

Of 190 consecutive patients, 102 (54%) were managed nonoperatively: 96 (65%) of 147 patients with blunt splenic injuries, which included 15 patients with intrinsic splenic pathology, and 6 hemodynamically stable patients with isolated stab wounds (24% of all splenic stab wounds). Fifty-six patients underwent splenectomy (29%) and 32 splenorrhaphy (17%). The mean transfusion requirement was 6 units for splenectomy survivors and 0.8 units for nonoperative therapy (85% received no transfusions). Fifteen of the 16 major infectious complications that occurred followed splenectomy. Two patients failed nonoperative therapy (2%) and underwent splenectomy, and one patient required splenectomy after partial splenic resection. There no missed enteric injuries in patients managed nonoperatively. The overall mortality rate was 5.2%, with no deaths following nonoperative management.

CONCLUSIONS

Nonoperative management of blunt splenic injuries has replaced splenorrhaphy as the most common method of splenic conservation. The criteria have been extended to include patients previously excluded from this form of therapy. As a result, 65% of all blunt splenic injuries and select stab wounds can be managed with minimal transfusions, morbidity, or mortality, with a success rate of 98%. Splenectomy, when necessary, continues to be associated with excessive transfusion and an inordinately high postoperative sepsis rate.

Nonoperative management of splenic injury: are follow-up computed tomographic scans of any value?

OBJECTIVE

To determine the value of follow-up abdominal computed tomography in patients with splenic trauma managed nonoperatively.

DESIGN

Retrospective chart review.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 108 consecutive patients with splenic injuries treated at a single institution from 1990 to 1996 were studied. All admission and follow-up computed tomographic (CT) scans were reviewed by the authors.

RESULTS

Initial management was surgical in 35 patients (32%) and intentionally nonoperative in 73 patients (68%). Nonoperative management was successful in 45 of 49 adults (92%) and 21 of 24 children(88%). Sixty-two follow-up abdominal CT scans were obtained in 49 patients. Information that affected management was evident on only one follow-up CT scan performed in the absence of clinical indications. Potential savings in hospital and physician charges for routine follow-up CT scans in this study were $54,302.00.

CONCLUSIONS

Follow-up abdominal CT scans are not routinely necessary in patients with splenic injuries managed nonoperatively.