Internal Carotid Artery Occlusion In a Patient With Malignant Peritoneal Mesothelioma: Is It a Sign of Malignancy-Related Thrombosis?

Malignant peritoneal mesothelioma

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The incidence of malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (MPM) is rising. Our aim was to present our experience with this entity in order to increase the awareness about this disease to avoid misdiagnosis.

METHODS

Records of seven patients with histologically confirmed MPM were retrospectively reviewed. Demographic and clinicopathological findings were studied in detail.

RESULTS

There were two females and 5 males; mean age was 50.3 years (range 16-73). Asbestos exposure was recorded in two patients, familial Mediterranean fever in one and previous radiation in one. Main presentations were abdominal pain and distension. None of the patients was diagnosed preoperatively. The average delay in diagnosis was 10 months. Calretinin expression was identified in all tumors. Three patients were treated with cytoreductive surgery combined with systemic chemotherapy. Two patients who remain alive were young female patients who were diagnosed by laparoscopic incidental findings and were treated with cytoreductive surgery combined with hyperthermic intraoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIIC). Median survival was 19.7 months. The average survival time of the five patients who died of their diseases was 10.2 months.

CONCLUSIONS

An awareness of MPM is important to prevent misdiagnosis. Immunohistochemistry has an important role in confirming the diagnosis. MPM remains a difficult therapeutic challenge. Thorough cytoreductive surgery is the cornerstone of current treatment while HIIC is a promising strategy in suitable patients.

Coagulation and cancer: implications for diagnosis and management

Coagulation disorders are a common problem in neoplastic patients and many factors contribute to increase the risk of thromboembolic events in these patients. An hypercoagulable state is induced by malignant cells interacting directly with hemostatic system and activating the coagulation cascade. More sensitive tests to assess an hypercoagulable state in cancer patients have been developed; even though these tests are always altered in cancer patients, none of them possess a clinical significance in terms of predictive value for the occurence of thromboembolism and disease prognosis in the individual patient. The most frequent thromboembolic complications in cancer patients are deep vein thrombosis of the lower extremities and pulmonary embolism; therefore, disseminated intravascular coagulation, thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura or haemolytic uremic syndrome are special manifestations of neoplastic disease. Diagnosis of idiopathic deep vein thrombosis, in the absence of other risk factors, could indicate the presence of occult malignant disease; however, the need for an extensive work-up to detect malignancy is still controversial. Neoplastic patients showing a thromboembolic event should be treated with unfractioned heparin or, alternatively, with low molecular weight heparins. In order to prevent recurrence, the administration of heparin should be associated and followed by an oral anticoagulant drug. In recent years new approaches in anti-aggregation therapy have been studied, such as COX-inhibitors, cicaprost and ReoPro; further studies are needed to determine the usefulness of these molecules in treatment of malignancies.