l-Glutamate determination in food samples by flow-injection analysis

Monosodium glutamate in chicken and beef stock cubes using high-performance liquid chromatography

In this survey monosodium glutamate (MSG) levels in chicken and beef stock cube samples were determined. A total number of 122 stock cube samples (from brands A, B, C, D) were collected from local markets in Ankara, Turkey. High-performance liquid chromatography with diode array detection (HPLC-DAD) was used for quantitative MSG determination. Mean MSG levels (±SE) in samples of A, B, C and D brands were 14.6 ± 0.2 g kg⁻¹, 11.9 ± 0.3 g kg⁻¹, 9.7 ± 0.1 g kg⁻¹ and 7.2 ± 0.1 g kg⁻¹, respectively. Differences between mean levels of brands were significant. Also, mean levels of chicken stock cube samples were lower than in beef stock cubes. Maximum limits for MSG in stock cubes are not specified in the Turkish Food Codex (TFC). Generally the limit for MSG in foods (except some foods) is established as 10 g kg⁻¹ (individually or in combination).

Urea degradation in some white wines by immobilized acid urease in a stirred bioreactor

A purified acid urease preparation was covalently immobilized onto either Eupergit C 250 L or glutaraldehyde-cross-linked chitosan-derivative beads (i.e., Chitopearls BCW-3003 and BCW-3010). The kinetics of urea degradation in two target Italian white (i.e., Grechetto and Sauvignon Blanc) wines, as well as in a model wine solution, by using the above Eupergit C 250 L-, BCW-3003-, or BCW-3010-based biocatalysts, was confirmed to be of the pseudofirst order with respect to the urea concentration in the liquid bulk and not limited by urea mass transfer. In Grechetto and Sauvignon Blanc wines, the corresponding kinetic rate constants were quite similar, being about 7, 18, or 17% of that observed for free enzyme in the model wine solution, respectively. Owing to their minor sensitivity to the phenolic content of the wines tested, the chitosan-based biocatalysts might be potentially employable in the make up of packed-bed cartridges to continuously remove urea from commercial wines.

Urea degradation in model wine solutions by free or immobilized acid urease in a stirred bioreactor

In this work, a purified acid urease preparation was covalently immobilized on Eupergit C 250 L and stabilized with glycine. Its average activity was found to be 69 +/- 16% of the initial one after 34-day storage at 4 degrees C . The kinetics of urea degradation in a model wine solution by immobilized enzyme was confirmed to be of pseudo-first-order with respect to the urea concentration in the liquid bulk, its apparent pseudo-first-order kinetic rate constant (k(Ii)) being about one-fourth of that (k(If)) pertaining to the free enzyme. In the operating conditions tested, the reaction kinetics was estimated as unaffected by the contribution of the external film and intraparticle diffusion mass transfer resistances. Because in the presence of the high-inhibitory tannins extracted from grape seeds in the range of 3-620 g of GAE m(-3) the loss in k(Ii) was quite smaller than that in k(If), the biocatalyst tested here is likely to overcome the present limits to the application of free acid urease in wine treatment.