Muller A, Leroy J, Hénon T, Patry I, Samain E, Chirouze C, Bertrand X. Surgical antibiotic prophylaxis compliance in a university hospital.
Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med 2015;
34:289-94. [PMID:
26384755 DOI:
10.1016/j.accpm.2015.04.004]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2014] [Accepted: 04/01/2015] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE
To assess surgical antibiotic prophylaxis (SAP) practices in a university hospital in order to identify risk factors associated with non-compliance.
STUDY DESIGN
Retrospective monocentric study conducted over a 4-month period.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
Data were collected from the software used in the operating theatre. Practice non-compliance was evaluated in comparison with the 2010 version of the French national recommendations. We only took in account the interventions identified as priority surveillance interventions according to the surgical site infections national surveillance. The risk factors associated with SAP non-compliance were identified with a multivariate statistical analysis.
RESULTS
We evaluated 1312 SAPs. Among the 1298 indicated SAPs, 44.4% were not compliant. The most frequent inappropriate criterion was the timing of injection (34.8% non-compliance), which was, in the majority of cases, too close to the time of incision. Other inappropriate criteria were identified: antibiotic choice for patients allergic to β-lactams (inappropriate among 45% of allergic patients), and antibiotic dosing for obese patients (96% of non-compliance). Obesity (OR=84.32), allergy to β-lactams (OR=17.11) and certain types of surgery (digestive, OR=4.56; gynaecological and obstetrical, OR=7.10; urological, OR=3.95) were independently associated with the non-compliance of SAP practices.
CONCLUSION
Improvement measures that target the timing of injection, obese or allergic patients are necessary.
Collapse