[Oncology and quality of life. Study in head and neck cancer]

Eating experiences and quality of life in patients with larynx cancer in Spain. A qualitative study

Purpose

This paper aims at describing the eating experience of people diagnosed with and treated for laryngeal cancer. Going beyond the mere conceptualization of “after-effect” or the quantification of the disease’s impact on the basis of standardized questionnaires, we present a qualitative analysis of the narratives of such experiences.

Methods

Ethnographic study. Data is obtained from conversations, semi-structured interviews, participant observation, and written documents. A discourse analysis of the narrative information was conducted, with process coding and using the constant comparative method, inductive content analysis, category analysis, units of meaning associated with each other, and triangulation.

Results

The impact of cancer on eating processes is not limited to nutrition, but also affects the social and cultural value of food, which is put into question. The symbolic and social values which accompany the traditional way of eating are modified, which is connected with impaired quality of life.

Conclusions

The impact on the eating process and its relationship with quality-of-life impairment are clear and connect with the importance of eating ways in culture and social organization. Greater attention should be paid to these contexts in clinical practice, which can affect even more than the impact on communicative processes.

Rehabilitation following total laryngectomy: Oncologic, functional, socio-occupational and psychological aspects

GOAL

To review rehabilitation following total laryngectomy by an analysis of epidemiological, oncologic and functional data.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective observational study focused on patients having undergone total laryngectomy or pharyngolaryngectomy between January 1, 2005 and December 31, 2016. Oncologic data notably comprised survival and relapse and predictive factors. The impact of the procedure on quality of life and the voice was analyzed by self-administered questionnaires (EORTC QLQ-C30 and H&N35, VHI 30). A satisfaction questionnaire was also sent to patients.

RESULTS

One hundred and thirty three patients were included. Overall specific 5-year survival was 65%. The relapse rate was 32%. Factors influencing survival were WHO performance status ≥2 (P<0.05), tumor location (P=0.07), metastatic lymphadenopathy (P=0.017) and positive resection margins (P=0.01). Quality of life was moderately degraded (global EORTC QLQ-C30 status: 61.4±23.9). Type of rehabilitation (P=0.03), tube feeding (P=0.03) and relapse (P<0.01) influenced quality of life. There were no differences in voice quality according to rehabilitation method, and no predictive factors for failure of voice rehabilitation. More than 90% of patients were satisfied with their hospital stay; 43%, however, were not satisfied with community caregiver training for laryngectomy patients.

CONCLUSION

Rehabilitation of laryngectomized patients is a current therapeutic challenge. A therapeutic education tool was designed to better meet patient expectations.

Quality of life in head and neck cancers patients: predictive factors, functional and psychosocial outcome

The principal endpoints in head and neck cancer are survival with improvement of quality of life (QoL) in cancer patients. Patients treated for head and neck cancer suffer from a number of symptom domains: physical symptoms linked to diet and feeding, communication disorders, pain and their general state of health; psychological symptoms including depression, irritability, loss of self-esteem (occasionally feelings of shame), and social symptoms including relationship difficulties with partner (sexual disorders) or with other family members, loss of work, reduction in salary, and sense of uselessness, resulting in a negative impact on their daily life. At present, most tools only partially evaluate patient QoL, concentrating on the global impact of disease and its treatment on patients' physical and psychological condition. The "sociability" of individual patients is rarely evaluated, and the development of qualitative studies in this domain will enable improved understanding of the social factors involved in each patient's adaptability to disease, its treatment and after-effects.