1
|
McGillion MH, Henry S, Busse JW, Ouellette C, Katz J, Choinière M, Lamy A, Whitlock R, Pettit S, Hare J, Gregus K, Brady K, Dvirnik N, Yang SS, Parlow J, Dumerton-Shore D, Gilron I, Buckley DN, Shanthanna H, Carroll SL, Coyte PC, Ebrahim S, Isaranuwatchai W, Guerriere DN, Hoch J, Khan J, MacDermid J, Martorella G, Victor JC, Watt-Watson J, Howard-Quijano K, Mahajan A, Chan MTV, Clarke H, Devereaux PJ. Examination of psychological risk factors for chronic pain following cardiac surgery: protocol for a prospective observational study. BMJ Open 2019; 9:e022995. [PMID: 30826789 PMCID: PMC6398732 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022995] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2018] [Revised: 11/15/2018] [Accepted: 11/16/2018] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Approximately 400 000 Americans and 36 000 Canadians undergo cardiac surgery annually, and up to 56% will develop chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP). The primary aim of this study is to explore the association of pain-related beliefs and gender-based pain expectations on the development of CPSP. Secondary goals are to: (A) explore risk factors for poor functional status and patient-level cost of illness from a societal perspective up to 12 months following cardiac surgery; and (B) determine the impact of CPSP on quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) borne by cardiac surgery, in addition to the incremental cost for one additional QALY gained, among those who develop CPSP compared with those who do not. METHODS AND ANALYSES In this prospective cohort study, 1250 adults undergoing cardiac surgery, including coronary artery bypass grafting and open-heart procedures, will be recruited over a 3-year period. Putative risk factors for CPSP will be captured prior to surgery, at postoperative day 3 (in hospital) and day 30 (at home). Outcome data will be collected via telephone interview at 6-month and 12-month follow-up. We will employ generalised estimating equations to model the primary (CPSP) and secondary outcomes (function and cost) while adjusting for prespecified model covariates. QALYs will be estimated by converting data from the Short Form-12 (version 2) to a utility score. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION This protocol has been approved by the responsible bodies at each of the hospital sites, and study enrolment began May 2015. We will disseminate our results through CardiacPain.Net, a web-based knowledge dissemination platform, presentation at international conferences and publications in scientific journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT01842568.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael H McGillion
- School of Nursing, McMaster University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Anesthesiology, Perioperative Medicine and Surgical Research Unit, Population Health Research Institute, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Shaunattonie Henry
- School of Nursing, McMaster University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Anesthesiology, Perioperative Medicine and Surgical Research Unit, Population Health Research Institute, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jason W Busse
- Department of Anesthesia, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Carley Ouellette
- School of Nursing, McMaster University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Anesthesiology, Perioperative Medicine and Surgical Research Unit, Population Health Research Institute, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Joel Katz
- Department of Psychology, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Manon Choinière
- Centre de recherche de Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Andre Lamy
- Anesthesiology, Perioperative Medicine and Surgical Research Unit, Population Health Research Institute, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Richard Whitlock
- Anesthesiology, Perioperative Medicine and Surgical Research Unit, Population Health Research Institute, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Shirley Pettit
- Anesthesiology, Perioperative Medicine and Surgical Research Unit, Population Health Research Institute, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jacqueline Hare
- Anesthesiology, Perioperative Medicine and Surgical Research Unit, Population Health Research Institute, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Krysten Gregus
- Anesthesiology, Perioperative Medicine and Surgical Research Unit, Population Health Research Institute, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Katheryn Brady
- Anesthesiology, Perioperative Medicine and Surgical Research Unit, Population Health Research Institute, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Nazari Dvirnik
- Anesthesiology, Perioperative Medicine and Surgical Research Unit, Population Health Research Institute, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Stephen Su Yang
- Anesthesiology, Perioperative Medicine and Surgical Research Unit, Population Health Research Institute, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Joel Parlow
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Ian Gilron
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - D Norman Buckley
- Department of Anesthesia, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Harsha Shanthanna
- Department of Anesthesia, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sandra L Carroll
- School of Nursing, McMaster University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Peter C Coyte
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Shanil Ebrahim
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Wanrudee Isaranuwatchai
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Denise N Guerriere
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jeffrey Hoch
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of California, Davis, Davis, California, USA
| | - James Khan
- Department of Anesthesia, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Joy MacDermid
- School of Physical Therapy, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - J Charles Victor
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Judy Watt-Watson
- Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Kimberly Howard-Quijano
- Department of Anesthesiology, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Aman Mahajan
- Department of Anesthesiology, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Matthew T V Chan
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong
| | - Hance Clarke
- Department of Anesthesia, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - P J Devereaux
- Anesthesiology, Perioperative Medicine and Surgical Research Unit, Population Health Research Institute, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
McGillion M, Yost J, Turner A, Bender D, Scott T, Carroll S, Ritvo P, Peter E, Lamy A, Furze G, Krull K, Dunlop V, Good A, Dvirnik N, Bedini D, Naus F, Pettit S, Henry S, Probst C, Mills J, Gossage E, Travale I, Duquette J, Taberner C, Bhavnani S, Khan JS, Cowan D, Romeril E, Lee J, Colella T, Choinière M, Busse J, Katz J, Victor JC, Hoch J, Isaranuwatchai W, Kaasalainen S, Ladak S, O'Keefe-McCarthy S, Parry M, Sessler DI, Stacey M, Stevens B, Stremler R, Thabane L, Watt-Watson J, Whitlock R, MacDermid JC, Leegaard M, McKelvie R, Hillmer M, Cooper L, Arthur G, Sider K, Oliver S, Boyajian K, Farrow M, Lawton C, Gamble D, Walsh J, Field M, LeFort S, Clyne W, Ricupero M, Poole L, Russell-Wood K, Weber M, McNeil J, Alpert R, Sharpe S, Bhella S, Mohajer D, Ponnambalam S, Lakhani N, Khan R, Liu P, Devereaux PJ. Technology-Enabled Remote Monitoring and Self-Management - Vision for Patient Empowerment Following Cardiac and Vascular Surgery: User Testing and Randomized Controlled Trial Protocol. JMIR Res Protoc 2016; 5:e149. [PMID: 27480247 PMCID: PMC4999307 DOI: 10.2196/resprot.5763] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2016] [Revised: 05/16/2016] [Accepted: 05/19/2016] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Tens of thousands of cardiac and vascular surgeries (CaVS) are performed on seniors in Canada and the United Kingdom each year to improve survival, relieve disease symptoms, and improve health-related quality of life (HRQL). However, chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP), undetected or delayed detection of hemodynamic compromise, complications, and related poor functional status are major problems for substantial numbers of patients during the recovery process. To tackle this problem, we aim to refine and test the effectiveness of an eHealth-enabled service delivery intervention, TecHnology-Enabled remote monitoring and Self-MAnagemenT—VIsion for patient EmpoWerment following Cardiac and VasculaR surgery (THE SMArTVIEW, CoVeRed), which combines remote monitoring, education, and self-management training to optimize recovery outcomes and experience of seniors undergoing CaVS in Canada and the United Kingdom. Objective Our objectives are to (1) refine SMArTVIEW via high-fidelity user testing and (2) examine the effectiveness of SMArTVIEW via a randomized controlled trial (RCT). Methods CaVS patients and clinicians will engage in two cycles of focus groups and usability testing at each site; feedback will be elicited about expectations and experience of SMArTVIEW, in context. The data will be used to refine the SMArTVIEW eHealth delivery program. Upon transfer to the surgical ward (ie, post-intensive care unit [ICU]), 256 CaVS patients will be reassessed postoperatively and randomly allocated via an interactive Web randomization system to the intervention group or usual care. The SMArTVIEW intervention will run from surgical ward day 2 until 8 weeks following surgery. Outcome assessments will occur on postoperative day 30; at week 8; and at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. The primary outcome is worst postop pain intensity upon movement in the previous 24 hours (Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form), averaged across the previous 14 days. Secondary outcomes include a composite of postoperative complications related to hemodynamic compromise—death, myocardial infarction, and nonfatal stroke— all-cause mortality and surgical site infections, functional status (Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-12), depressive symptoms (Geriatric Depression Scale), health service utilization-related costs (health service utilization data from the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences data repository), and patient-level cost of recovery (Ambulatory Home Care Record). A linear mixed model will be used to assess the effects of the intervention on the primary outcome, with an a priori contrast of weekly average worst pain intensity upon movement to evaluate the primary endpoint of pain at 8 weeks postoperation. We will also examine the incremental cost of the intervention compared to usual care using a regression model to estimate the difference in expected health care costs between groups. Results Study start-up is underway and usability testing is scheduled to begin in the fall of 2016. Conclusions Given our experience, dedicated industry partners, and related RCT infrastructure, we are confident we can make a lasting contribution to improving the care of seniors who undergo CaVS.
Collapse
|