Hemashield implantation in young patients with congenital cardiovascular lesions

Primary or secondary Bentall-De Bono procedure: are the outcomes worse?

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of a primary and secondary Bentall-De Bono procedure.

METHODS

From 2008 to 2015 (8-year period), 308 patients underwent a Bentall-De Bono procedure in our institute. The mean age was 43 ± 13 years and 80% were men. Twenty-eight patients had prior cardiac surgery through a median sternotomy (group 1) and 280 underwent a primary Bentall-De Bono procedure (group 2). Various preoperative and perioperative parameters were analyzed before and after propensity-score matching.

RESULTS

Before propensity-score matching, patients undergoing a secondary Bentall-De Bono procedure had a worse preoperative profile, as indicated by a higher EuroSCORE II ( p < 0.0001), with hospital mortality in group 1 of 14% (4/28) and 5% (14/280) in group 2 ( p = 0.069). After propensity-score matching, there was no significant difference in EuroSCORE II ( p = 0.922) or hospital mortality ( p = 0.729). After adjusting for the different variables, repeat sternotomy could not be identified as an independent predictor of postoperative mortality or morbidity. Survival at the end of 1 and 5 years in both groups showed no significant differences before or after propensity-score matching ( p = 0.328 and p = 0.356, respectively). In Cox multivariable regression analysis, reoperation was not identified as an independent factor for survival before ( p = 0.559) or after propensity-score matching ( p = 0.365).

CONCLUSION

A secondary Bentall-De Bono procedure can be performed with acceptable mortality and morbidity, and with midterm survival rates comparable to those of a primary Bentall-De Bono procedure.

Impact of collagen-coated and gelatine-impregnated woven Dacron branched grafts on the early postoperative period

To investigate the impact of two different sealed Dacron vascular branched prostheses on the early postoperative period, 30 patients whose aortic arch was replaced by either a collagen-coated (n=18) or a gelatine-impregnated (n=12) branched prosthesis were retrospectively studied. The patients who received a collagen-coated branched prosthesis required longer chest drainage (11.9+/-5.2 vs. 7.9+/-4.6 days, p<0.05). On the other hand, higher white cell count on 7th postoperative day (9,406+/-3,485 vs. 11,810+/-4,378/microL, p<0.05) was observed in the patients with a gelatine-impregnated branched prosthesis. Biocompatibility of the prostheses could affect the early postoperative course, therefore these specific impacts should be considered to manage the patients with these prostheses.