Total arch replacement using aortic arch branched grafts with the aid of antegrade selective cerebral perfusion

Single graft "peninsula-style" transverse aortic arch replacement in patients with type A acute aortic dissection: case report

Acute type A aortic dissection, despite treatment advances, remains a critical emergency with markedly high morbidity and mortality rates. The primary goals of immediate surgical intervention are to ensure survival, prevent severe complications, and avoid subsequent interventions. We present a case of a 55-year-old male who presented with new-onset chest pain, dyspnea, and hypotension. Emergent transthoracic echocardiography and subsequent computed tomography revealed an ascending aortic dissection. The patient underwent immediate surgical repair using a "peninsula-style" technique for transverse arch replacement with a single piece of Dacron graft, preserving continuity with the proximal descending aorta and performing routine aortic valve commissural resuspension. Following an uncomplicated postoperative course, he was discharged in a stable condition, and an 18-month follow-up CT showed no signs of aorta-related complications. This case report underscores the importance of having specialized thoracic aortic teams capable of using easily reproducible techniques, reducing operative time, and yielding reliable results.

Long-term outcomes of total arch replacement with bilateral antegrade cerebral perfusion using the "arch first" approach

ObjectiveTo report outcomes of total arch replacement (TAR) with hypothermic circulatory arrest and bilateral antegrade cerebral perfusion (bACP) using an "arch first" approach for acute Type A aortic dissection (ATAAD). The "arch first" approach involved revascularization of the aortic arch branch vessels with uninterrupted ACP, before lower body circulatory arrest, while the patient was cooling.MethodsThis was an observational study of aortic surgeries from 2010 to 2021. All patients who underwent TAR with bACP for ATAAD were included. Short-term and long-term outcomes were reported utilizing descriptive statistics and Kaplan-Meier survival estimation.ResultsA total of 215 patients were identified who underwent TAR + bACP for ATAAD. Age was 59.0 [49.0-67.0] years and 35.3% were female. 73 patients (34.0%) underwent a concomitant aortic root replacement, 188 (87.4%) had aortic cannulation, circulatory arrest time was 37.0 [26.0-52.0] minutes, and nadir temperature was 20.8 [19.4-22.5] degrees Celsius. 35 patients (16.3%) had operative mortality (STS definition), 17 (7.9%) had a new stroke, 79 (36.7%) had prolonged mechanical ventilation (>24 h), 35 (16.3%) had acute renal failure (by RIFLE criteria), and 128 (59.5%) had blood product transfusions. One-year survival was 77.1%, while 5-years survival was 67.1%. During follow-up, there were 23 (10.7%) reinterventions involving the descending thoracic aorta - either thoracic endovascular aortic repair or open thoracoabdominal aortic replacement.ConclusionsAmong patients with ATAAD, short-term postoperative outcomes after TAR + bACP using the "arch first" approach are acceptable. Moreover, this operative strategy may furnish long-term durability, with a reasonably low reintervention rate and satisfactory overall survival.

Retrograde inferior vena cava perfusion reduces the risk of acute kidney injury depending on the oxygen extraction ratio. A retrospective cohort study

Background

Total aortic arch replacement surgery (TARS) for Acute type A aortic dissection is associated with high incidence of postoperative acute kidney injury (AKI), at least partly due to the lower body ischemia during circulatory arrest. This study aimed to evaluate whether retrograde inferior vena cava perfusion (RIVP) reduces the risk of AKI by providing oxygenated blood to the lower body.

Methods

This retrospective study utilized a medical recording system to screen patients who underwent TARS from January 1 to December 31, 2019. Patients were assigned to receive antegrade cerebral perfusion (ACP) only or ACP + RIVP during circulatory arrest. The primary outcome was postoperative AKI. Oxygen delivery, consumption, and extraction ratio during RIVP were also determined.

Results

Of all included 87 patients, postoperative AKI occurred in 35 (40%), of whom 23 (53.5%) were in the ACP, and 12 (27.3%) were in the ACP + RIVP (P = 0.013). In regression analysis, ACP + RIVP was associated with lower risk of AKI than ACP alone (adjusted OR 0.229; 95% CI 0.071-0.746). RIVP at a pressure of 22.5 ± 3.8 mmHg delivered 0.98 ± 0.34 ml/min/kg of oxygen to the lower body, and the partial oxygen pressure decreased from 359 ± 57 mmHg in RIVP blood to 64 ± 30 mmHg in returning blood. Oxygen extraction ratio was 44 ± 16%, which correlated negatively with peak postoperative creatinine levels (r = -0.58, P = 0.01) and creatinine increase (r = -0.61, P = 0.009). No correlations were found between oxygen delivery and postoperative creatinine or creatinine increase.

Conclusion

RIVP may reduce the risk of postoperative AKI in a manner that depends on the tissue oxygen extraction ratio.

Investigation of risk factors and outcomes of aortic arch aneurysm repair in octogenarians

OBJECTIVE

We reviewed the treatment outcomes for aortic arch aneurysms in elderly patients aged > 80 years, and discussed the risk factors for each technique.

METHODS

Octogenarians who underwent aortic arch aneurysm repair between 2007 and 2021 were included. Fifty-four patients (23 in the total arch replacement [TAR] group and 31 in the thoracic endovascular aortic repair [TEVAR] group) were included in the study. The early- and mid-term outcomes and risk factors for all-cause mortality were examined in each group. To examine timely surgical outcomes, cases of true aneurysms were included, whereas dissected aneurysms and emergency cases due to rupture or other causes were excluded.

RESULTS

No significant differences in 30-day mortality (0% in the TAR group and 5.4% in the TEVAR group) and in-hospital mortality (7.7% in the TAR group and 8.1% in the TEVAR group) were observed between the two groups. The survival rates at 5 years were 82% and 65% in the TAR and TEVAR groups, respectively, without significant difference. The aorta-related averted mortality was 91% and 81% in the TAR and TEVAR groups, respectively, without significant difference. No significant difference in the freedom from aortic events was also observed between the two groups. Previous ischemic heart disease was a significant risk factor for all-cause mortality in the TAR group. No significant risk factors were identified in this group.

CONCLUSION

The choice of procedure was reasonable when considering frailty. Endovascular repair may be a good treatment option for patients with a history of ischemic heart disease.

Aortic valve-sparing operation at concomitant aortic root and total aortic arch replacement

OBJECTIVE

Sparing aortic valve during combined aortic root replacement (ARR) and total aortic arch replacement (TAR) adds surgical complexity; however, the long-term outcomes are unknown. We examine the safety of aortic valve-sparing during these operations.

METHODS

To include patients who were potentially eligible for valve-sparing procedures, aortic stenosis, endocarditis, and previous aortic valve surgery were excluded, leaving 81 patients who underwent ARR and TAR between 2004 and 2021 at 2 major aortic centers. Overall, 34 underwent valve-sparing aortic root replacement (VSRR) and 47 underwent composite valve graft root replacement (CVG). The primary endpoint was uneventful recovery: a composite endpoint describing any patient discharged from the hospital without mortality or any postoperative complications including stroke, re-operation for bleeding, prolonged ventilation, or acute renal failure. Secondary endpoints were long-term survival and cardiovascular reintervention at 12 years.

RESULTS

VSRR was more frequently performed in younger patients with connective tissue disorder (P = 0.006) and less than moderate aortic insufficiency (P = 0.002). VSRR had longer cross-clamp time (243, [200-286] vs. 216, [181-250] minutes, P = 0.032). In-hospital mortality (VSRR: 5.9% vs CVG: 10.6%, P = 0.693) and uneventful recovery (VSRR: 47.1% vs CVG: 44.7%, P = 1.000) were not different. Multivariable Logistic regression showed that VSRR was not associated with the uneventful recovery (OR 1.165, 95% CI [0.356-3.814], P = 0.801). Twelve-year survival (VSRR: 80.8% [63.1-100.0%] vs. CVG: 66.3% [47.9-91.7%]; P = 0.320) and the incidence of reintervention (VSRR: 39.0% [19.0-59.0%] vs. CVG: 39.0% [16.0-61.0%], P = 0.820) were similar between groups.

CONCLUSION

In appropriately selected patients requiring concomitant ARR and TAR, aortic valve-sparing operation may be performed safely.

Cerebral Protection With Deep Hypothermic Circulatory Arrest During Total Arch Replacement Using the Arch-First Technique for Acute Aortic Dissection

OBJECTIVES

Stroke remains a serious complication after total arch replacement (TAR). To prevent this, deep hypothermia is commonly employed during TAR. We evaluated the effectiveness of cerebral protection using deep hypothermic circulatory arrest (DHCA) during TAR with the arch-first technique, focusing particularly on patients with acute aortic dissection (AAD).

METHODS

This retrospective study included 109 consecutive patients with AAD who underwent emergency TAR using the arch-first technique under DHCA, and 147 patients with non-ruptured aneurysm who underwent scheduled TAR using the same technique between October 2009 and July 2022. We reviewed these patients for major adverse events, including stroke and 30-day mortality after surgery. We also analyzed the impact of clinical variables and anatomical features on the occurrence of newly developed stroke after TAR in patients with AAD.

RESULTS

A newly developed stroke after TAR occurred in 11 (10.1%) patients with AAD. These were attributed to embolism in eight patients, malperfusion in two patients (including one who had been comatose), and low output syndrome in one patient. A stroke occurred in 3 (2.0%) patients with aneurysm, all due to embolism (P = 0.005). The DHCA time was 37 ± 7 minutes for patients with AAD and 36 ± 6 minutes for patients with aneurysm (P = 0.122). The 30-day mortality rate was 10 (9.2%) for patients with AAD and 2 (1.4%) for patients with aneurysm (P = 0.003). In our multivariable analysis, arch vessel dissection with a patent false lumen (double-barreled dissection) was the only significant predictor of newly developed stroke after TAR for AAD (odds ratio, 33.02; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with aneurysm undergoing TAR using the arch-first technique under DHCA experienced significantly better outcomes, in terms of newly developed stroke and 30-day mortality, than those with AAD. Cerebral protection with DHCA during TAR using the arch-first technique continues to be a viable option. Newly developed stroke in patients undergoing TAR for AAD appears to be associated with air emboli deriving from the residual dissection with a patent false lumen in the repaired arch vessels.

Bilateral Axillary Artery Perfusion in Total Arch Replacement

BACKGROUND

The site of arterial cannulation is an important consideration in the prevention of cerebral infarction after total arch replacement. We compared the outcomes of cannulation of the bilateral axillary artery, the femoral artery, and central cannulation in total arch replacement.

METHODS

Enrolled were 242 patients, categorized into three groups according to the arterial cannulation site used: bilateral axillary artery group, 124 patients; femoral artery group, 88 patients; central cannulation group, 30 patients. Selective cerebral perfusion was used for brain protection in all patients. Surgical outcomes, including the incidence of postoperative cerebral infarction, were compared between the groups.

RESULTS

Cardiopulmonary bypass time and lower-body circulatory arrest time were significantly shorter in the bilateral axillary artery group. Frozen elephant trunk procedure was performed in 54% of the bilateral axillary artery group (P < .001), and concomitant coronary artery bypass graft surgery was performed in 40% of the central cannulation group (P < .01). Hospital mortality in the bilateral axillary artery group was 1.6%, compared with 1.1% in the femoral artery group, and 0% in the central cannulation group (P = .72). The incidence of permanent neurologic deficit was significantly lower in the bilateral axillary artery group (0.8%) than in the central cannulation group (13%; P = .02). Logistic regression analysis indicated that bilateral axillary artery perfusion was a significant factor in the prevention of permanent neurologic deficit (odds ratio 0.10, P = .03).

CONCLUSIONS

Recent technical advances using bilateral axillary artery perfusion and frozen elephant trunk technique were associated with shortening cardiopulmonary bypass time and prevention of postoperative cerebral infarction in total arch replacement.

The short-term efficacy of adventitial inversion with graft eversion anastomosis for the reconstruction of the aortic sinus in the root treatment of aortic dissection

Background

The surgical approaches for a mildly affected aortic sinus (AS) are varied and controversial. Here, the AS was reconstructed using the extended adventitial inversion with graft eversion anastomosis technique before its perioperative and short-term efficacy was compared with that of the vascular grafts that wrap the aortic wall and the right atrial shunt technique, providing a new basis for surgical management strategies.

Method

A total of 101 patients with mildly affected AS were enrolled in the clinical trial. The extended adventitial inversion suture and the graft eversion anastomosis technique was performed in group A. Aorta wrapping and the right atrial shunt technique were performed in group B. The primary endpoints were reoperation-related events and fatal events related to the aorta, while the secondary endpoints were the duration of surgery and structural changes in the aortic root. Cardiac ultrasound and aortic computed tomography angiography examinations were performed before surgery, 2 weeks after surgery, and 1 year after surgery.

Results

Compared to group B (n = 56), group A (n = 36) had a significantly shorter duration of surgery (the time from skin incision to skin closure) and a reduced time from shutdown to skin closure (P < 0.05). Cardiovascular ultrasound examinations performed at follow-up 12 months after surgery and 2 weeks after surgery revealed a significant increase in the diameter of the aortic sinotubular junction (STJ) of group B (n = 50) (P < 0.05). The extended adventitial inversion suture and the graft eversion anastomosis technique (n = 33) performed better than Aorta wrapping and the right atrial shunt technique in terms of persistence of the false lumen closure effect, anastomotic leakage, and reduction in aortic valve (P < 0.05), and there was a significant difference between the two groups in terms of the incidence of events related to reoperation (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

Compared with the aorta wrapping and the right atrial shunt technique, the extended adventitial inversion suture and the graft eversion anastomosis technique allow shortening of the operation time and preventing near-term dilation of the STJ, with improved safety and an improved short-term surgical effect.

Aortic arch repair: lessons learned over three decades at Baylor College of Medicine

The treatment of complex aortic arch disease continues to be among the most demanding cardiovascular operations, with a considerable risk of death and stroke. Since January 1990, our single-practice service has performed over 3000 repairs of the aortic arch. Our aim was to describe the progression of our technical approach to open aortic arch repair. Our center's surgical technique has evolved considerably over the last three decades. When it comes to initial arterial cannulation, we have shifted away from femoral artery cannulation to innominate and axillary artery cannulation. During difficult repairs, this transition has made it easier to use antegrade cerebral perfusion rather than retrograde cerebral perfusion, which was commonly used in the early days. Brain protection tactics during open aortic arch procedures have evolved from profound (≤14 °C) hypothermia during circulatory arrest to moderate (22-24 °C) hypothermia. Aortic arch repair is performed through a median sternotomy and may treat acute aortic dissection, chronic aortic dissection, or degenerative aneurysm. Reoperative repair - that necessitating redo sternotomy - is common in patients undergoing aortic arch repair. The majority of repairs will include varying portions of the ascending aorta and may involve the aortic valve or the aortic root. In some patients, repair may extend into the proximal descending thoracic aorta; this includes elephant trunk, frozen elephant trunk, and antegrade hybrid approaches.

Anaesthetic-surgical guide in the treatment of ascending aorta and surgery of the ascending aorta and aortic arch. Consensus document of the Spanish Society of Cardiovascular and Endovascular Surgery and the Sociedad of Anaesthesiology, Resuscitation and Pain Therapy

Aortic pathology is always a challenge for the clinician, and must be diagnosed and treated by a multidisciplinary team due to the technical and technological complexity of the resources used. Ongoing efforts to implement a systematic, protocolized approach involving "Aortic teams" made up of cardiologists, cardiac surgeons, vascular surgeons, anaesthesiologists and radiologists, among others are now leading to improved outcomes. The aim of this consensus document drawn up by the Aortic working groups of the Spanish Society of Anaesthesiology, Resuscitation and Pain Therapy (SEDAR) and the Spanish Society of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery (SECTCV) is to disseminate a set of working protocols. The latest consensus document of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS) and the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) define the concept of "AORTIC TEAM"(1). The aortic team should be closely involved from diagnosis to treatment and finally follow-up, and should be formed of cardiac and vascular surgeons working together with anaesthesiologists, cardiologists, radiologists and geneticists. Treatment of aortic pathologies should be centralised in large centres, because this is the only way to effectively understand the natural course of the disease, provide the entire range of treatment options under one umbrella and treat potential complications. A streamlined emergent care pathway (24/7 availability), adequate transportation and transfer capabilities, as well as rapid activation of the multidisciplinary team must be available. In light of the complexity and constant evolution of therapeutic options, we present this first version of the Anaesthesiology and surgical guidelines for surgery of the ascending aorta and aortic arch. Some questions will no doubt remain unanswered, and future versions will include new techniques that, though implemented in some centres, are still not widely recommended.

Frozen Elephant Trunk: Technical Overview and Our Experience with a Patient-Tailored Approach

Ever since the first hybrid prosthesis was used for a total aortic arch replacement, many other techniques have been developed to comply with the need for the treatment of a wide spectrum of patients and their clinical pictures. We hereby provide an overview of the most popular surgical techniques to perform a frozen elephant trunk, including our tailored approach revolving around the antegrade deployment of a Gore C-TAG endovascular stent graft sutured to a four-branched vascular prosthesis. This technique was applied to three cases of acute type A aortic dissection. Although our small series of patients consists of acute aortic dissections only, this technique could be applied to any other aortic arch pathology, such as chronic dissections or aneurysms. Moreover, we believe that, because of the individually tailored approach and widespread availability of the necessary materials, this technique can reveal itself useful in many different operative scenarios.

Comparison of outcomes in DeBakey type I versus DeBakey type II aortic dissection: a 17-year single center experience

Background

It is controversial if the type or the size of aortic dissection is associated with the mortality in patients with acute aortic dissection (AAD) type I or type II according to DeBakey. Due to the pronounced aortic pathology in DeBakey type I compared to DeBakey type II, it is to be expected, that the DeBakey type I is associated with a significant higher morbidity and mortality. But we hypothesize that the current advances in surgical techniques, circulatory management, and postoperative care improve the clinical outcome of patients with DeBakey type I and II. The purpose of this study was to evaluate retrospectively the effect of these parameters on surgical outcome in patients with DeBakey type I and type II in a large cohort study.

Methods

From 2001 to 2019, 395 consecutive patients (34.2% female) underwent surgical aortic repair at our institution. Patients were retrospectively classified into 2 groups: patients with type 1 dissection (group 1: n=309, median age of 62.0 years) and patients with type 2 dissection (group 2: n=86, 67.5 years). Survival was estimated by Kaplan-Meier estimator. Risk factors were analyzed by logistic regression analysis.

Results

The patients in group 1 suffered significantly more often from coronary heart disease [43 (13.9%) vs. 20 (23.3%), P=0.036]. Otherwise, there were no significant differences between both groups concerning preoperative risk factors. The median surgical duration (279 vs. 263 min, P=0.026) and the circulatory arrest time (35 vs. 27 min, P<0.001) in group 1 were significantly higher. In a significantly higher number of patients in group 1, the aortic arch was completely replaced (18.4% vs. 1.2%, P<0.001) and a simultaneous coronary artery bypass grafting [18 (5.8%) vs. 11 (12.8%), P=0.028] was performed. The rate of re-thoracotomy [62 (20.1%) vs. 9 (10.5%), P=0.040], of postoperative delirium [66 (21.4%) vs. 9 (10.6%), P=0.024], and of tracheotomy [85 (27.5%) vs. 14 (16.3%), P=0.034] were significantly higher in group 1. Thirty-day mortality was 15.7% and did not differ significantly between both groups (P=0.867), as well as the long-term survival rates (P=0.956).

Conclusions

Due to the pronounced aortic pathology in type I compared to type II, it is to be expected, that the type I is associated with a significant higher morbidity and mortality. DeBakey type I was an independent predictor for 30-day mortality in our study, however, based on our 17-year single center experience there was no difference between the long-term survival in both groups.

Bailout Solution for Hemostasis from Distal Anastomotic Site during Total Aortic Arch Repair

Intraoperative bleeding from the distal anastomotic site during graft replacement of the arch to distal arch via median sternotomy to treat an aortic aneurysm is sometimes difficult to control because of the limited distal view. I herein report a case in which I addressed this uncontrollable bleeding using a commercialized frozen elephant trunk.

Procedure-Associated Costs and Mid-Term Outcomes of Endovascular Zone 0 and Zone 1 Aortic Arch Repair

BACKGROUND

Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) of proximal aortic arch pathology provides a less-invasive treatment option for high-risk patients ineligible for open arch reconstruction. However, the fiscal impact of these techniques remains unclear. Therefore, our objective was to characterize the mid-term outcomes after Zone 0 and Zone 1 TEVAR and describe the associated technical costs, revenues, and net margins at a single tertiary medical center.

METHODS

We examined all patients who underwent TEVAR between April 2011 and August 2019 via retrospective chart review. Patients were categorized by proximal endograft extent to identify Zone 0 or Zone 1 repairs. Procedural characteristics and outcomes were described. Technical costs, revenues, and margins were obtained from the hospital finance department.

RESULTS

We identified 10 patients (6 Zone 0, 4 Zone 1) who were denied open arch reconstruction. Patients were predominantly female (n = 8; 80%) and the mean age was 72.8 ± 5.5 years. TEVAR was performed in 5 asymptomatic patients, urgently in 3 symptomatic patients, and emergently in 2 ruptured patients. TEVAR plus extra-anatomic bypass was performed in 4 patients. Another 4 patients also received parallel stent-grafting while 1 patient received a branched thoracic endograft and yet another an in-situ laser fenestration followed by branch stent grafting. Within the 30-day postoperative period, 1 patient experienced stroke and 1 patient died. Bypass and branch vessel patency were 100% through the duration of follow-up (mean 19.3 months). Mean total technical cost associated with all procedures or repair stages was $105,164 ± $59,338 while mean net technical margin was -$25,055 ± $18,746. The net technical margin was negative for 9 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Endovascular repair of the proximal aortic arch is associated with good mid-term outcomes in patients considered too high-risk for open repair. However, reimbursement does not adequately cover treatment cost, with net technical margins being negative in nearly all cases. To remain financially sustainable, efforts should be made to both optimize aortic arch TEVAR delivery as well as advocate for reimbursement commensurate with associated costs.

Evolving Surgical Techniques and Improving Outcomes for Aortic Arch Surgery in Canada

Background

To explore evolving surgical techniques and outcomes for aortic arch surgery.

Methods

A total of 2435 consecutive patients underwent aortic arch repair with hypothermic circulatory arrest between 2008 and 2018 in 12 institutions across Canada. Trends in patient characteristics, surgical techniques, and in-hospital outcomes, including major morbidity or mortality, were examined.

Results

From 2008 to 2018, the age of patients (62.3 ± 13.2 years) and the proportion of women (30.2%) undergoing arch surgery did not change significantly. Aortic diameters at operation decreased (2008: 58 ± 13 mm; 2018: 53 ± 11 mm; P < 0.01). Surgeons performed more valve-sparing root replacements (2008: 0%; 2018: 15%; P < 0.001) and fewer Bentall procedures (2008: 27%; 2018: 20%; P < 0.01). Total arch replacement rates were similar (P = 0.18); however, elephant trunk (2008: 9.5%; 2018: 19%; P < 0.001) and frozen elephant trunk (2008: 3.1%; 2018: 15%; P < 0.001) repair rates have increased. Over time, higher nadir temperatures (2008: 18 [17-21]°C; 2018: 25 [23-28]°C; P < 0.001), and more frequent antegrade cerebral perfusion (2008: 61%; 2018: 83%; P < 0.001) were used. For elective cases, in-hospital mortality rates declined (2008: 6.8%; 2018: 1.2%; P = < 0.01), as did major morbidity or mortality (2008: 24%; 2018: 13%; P < 0.001) and transfusion rates (2008: 61%; 2018: 41%; P < 0.001), but stroke rates remained constant (2008: 6.8%; 2018: 5.3%; P = 0.12). Outcomes remained the same over time for urgent or emergent cases.

Conclusions

Outcomes have improved over the past decade in Canada for elective aortic arch surgery, in the context of operating on smaller aortas, and more frequent use of moderate hypothermia and antegrade cerebral perfusion. Further research is needed to improve stroke rates and outcomes in the emergency setting.

Unilateral versus bilateral cerebral perfusion during aortic surgery for acute type A aortic dissection: a multicentre study

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this retrospective multicentre study was to investigate and compare clinical outcomes of unilateral and bilateral antegrade cerebral perfusion (ACP) strategies on cerebral protection during surgery for type A aortic dissection.

METHODS

Data from 646 patients who underwent surgical repair of thoracic type A aortic dissection using unilateral and bilateral ACP with moderate hypothermic circulatory arrest in 3 cardiac surgical institutions between 2008 and 2018 were analysed. Propensity matching was performed to assess which technique ensured better outcomes.

RESULTS

Unilateral and bilateral ACP techniques were performed in 250 (39%) and in 396 (61%) patients, respectively. Propensity score analysis identified 189 matched pairs. In the matched cohort, the lowest core temperature was 27.5°C and 28°C in the bilateral and unilateral groups, respectively (P < 0.001). The unilateral technique required significantly shorter aortic cross-clamp and cardiopulmonary bypass times than bilateral technique [82 min vs 100 min (P < 0.001); 170 min vs 195 min (P < 0.001)]. The 30-day mortality was comparable (P = 0.325). The bilateral group reported a significantly higher incidence of permanent neurologic deficits (P < 0.001), left brain hemisphere stroke (P = 0.007) and all-combined complications (P < 0.001). Ten-year survival was comparable (P = 0.45).

CONCLUSIONS

Unilateral and bilateral ACP are both valid brain protection strategies in the landscape of aortic arch surgery. While admitting all the study limitations, unilateral technique could offer some clinical advantages.

CLINICAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

76049.

Anaesthetic-surgical guide in the treatment of ascending aorta and surgery of the ascending aorta and aortic arch. Consensus document of the Spanish Society of Cardiovascular and Endovascular Surgery and the Sociedad of Anaesthesiology, Resuscitation and Pain Therapy

Aortic pathology is always a challenge for the clinician, and must be diagnosed and treated by a multidisciplinary team due to the technical and technological complexity of the resources used. Ongoing efforts to implement a systematic, protocolized approach involving "Aortic teams" made up of cardiologists, cardiac surgeons, vascular surgeons, anaesthesiologists and radiologists, among others are now leading to improved outcomes. The aim of this consensus document drawn up by the Aortic working groups of the Spanish Society of Anaesthesiology, Resuscitation and Pain Therapy (SEDAR) and the Spanish Society of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery (SECTCV) is to disseminate a set of working protocols. The latest consensus document of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS) and the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) define the concept of "AORTIC TEAM"(1). The aortic team should be closely involved from diagnosis to treatment and finally follow-up, and should be formed of cardiac and vascular surgeons working together with anaesthesiologists, cardiologists, radiologists and geneticists. Treatment of aortic pathologies should be centralised in large centres, because this is the only way to effectively understand the natural course of the disease, provide the entire range of treatment options under one umbrella and treat potential complications. A streamlined emergent care pathway (24/7 availability), adequate transportation and transfer capabilities, as well as rapid activation of the multidisciplinary team must be available. In light of the complexity and constant evolution of therapeutic options, we present this first version of the Anaesthesiology and surgical guidelines for surgery of the ascending aorta and aortic arch. Some questions will no doubt remain unanswered, and future versions will include new techniques that, though implemented in some centres, are still not widely recommended.

A decade of surgical therapy in an all-comer cohort with type A aortic dissection

BACKGROUND

We reported on a decade of aortic surgery for type A aortic dissection to assess surgical techniques employed and outcomes over time in an all-comer analysis of a mid-size university cardiosurgical center.

METHODS

From 2009 to 2018, 283 patients (189 males and 94 females, mean age 62 years, range 30-85 years), who underwent surgical therapy for type A aortic dissection in our institution were included in a retrospective statistical analysis.

RESULTS

Among all the patients, 55.5% of them were hemodynamically stable, 10.3% came in intubated. A neurological deficit was present in 18.9% of cases, extremity malperfusion was noted in 17.4%, and abdominal malperfusion detected in 8.2%. The extent of the aortic dissection corresponded to DeBakey type I in 88% of cases, a thoracoabdominal involvement was seen in 64%. In 51.9% of patients, only the ascending aorta replaced, another 40.6% of patients had proximal arch replacement too. A separate stent placement into the descending aorta was achieved in 13.4% of patients, during surgery (5.7%) or thereafter (7.7%). Overall survival to discharge was 79.5%. Most frequent complications were stroke and paralysis (15.2%), but only visceral malperfusion (OR 9.0) and heart failure mandating ECMO therapy (OR 29.5) were associated with significantly increased mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgery for type A aortic dissection is still challenging. Along with the refinement of surgical techniques, the indication for the various procedures has moved from a simplified general strategy to a more individualized concept.

Mild hypothermic circulatory arrest with selective cerebral perfusion in open arch surgery

Background

This study aimed to evaluate whether the use of mild hypothermic circulatory arrest (HCA) with selective cerebral perfusion (SCP) in open arch procedure provides comparable perioperative results to moderate HCA for patients with dissected or degenerative arch pathologies.

Methods

Between January 2017 and September 2020, a total of 88 consecutive patients (mean age 47±11 years, 71 males) underwent open arch repair under a single surgeon at our institution with mild or moderate systemic hypothermia assisted by unilateral or bilateral SCP. Patients were divided into groups according to the nasopharyngeal temperature at the beginning of HCA: a moderate HCA group (n=47, 53.4%) and a mild HCA group (n=41, 46.6%). The postoperative mortality, morbidity, and visceral organ functions between these groups were analyzed retrospectively.

Results

Compared to the moderate HCA group, the mild HCA group had a significantly higher core temperature (nasopharynx: 24.4±0.8 vs. 28.5±2, P<0.001; bladder 25.9±0.9 vs. 30±1.2, P<0.001), and the incidence of major adverse events (MAE) in this group was markedly lower (21.3% vs. 4.9%, P=0.031). No differences were identified between the two groups refer to in-hospital mortality, permanent neurological deficit (PND), temporary neurological deficit (TND), and paraplegia (8.5% vs. 2.4%, P=0.366; 8.5% vs. 0, P=0.120; 6.4% vs. 7.3%, P=1.0; 4.3% vs. 2.4%, P=1.0, respectively). In the moderate HCA group, 6 patients (12.8%) developed acute renal failure needing replacement therapy, which did not occur in the mild HCA group (P=0.028). The duration of ventilator support and intensive care unit stay was shorter in the mild HCA group, as well as a decreased volume of drainage during the first 24 h and reduced platelet transfusion.

Conclusions

The preliminary results of the mild HCA group with SCP applied in open arch repair, mainly in total arch replacement (TAR) and stented elephant trunk (SET) implantation for aortic dissection, were satisfactory. Furthermore, comparable inferior outcomes were obtained with mild HCA compared with that of the conventional moderate HCA strategy. These encouraging surgical and postoperative results favor this more aggressive hypothermia strategy in open arch repair.

Arch replacement with collared elephant trunks: The Siena approach

Objective

To illustrate our experience and results in patients with diffuse aneurysmal disease treated with arch replacement using the Siena collared graft, a device designed in 2002 to improve the elephant trunk technique. Results of the first step surgical implant and the subsequent treatment strategies, with extensive use of endovascular techniques, are reported.

Methods

All aortic arch–replacement procedures using the Siena graft between February 2002 and January 2020 were retrospectively analyzed for early and late clinical outcomes.

Results

Of 146 patients (54 women, 36.9%) with a median age of 69.1 years (interquartile range 58.4-75.0 years), 55 (37.6%) had acute/chronic dissection with false lumen aneurysmal dilatation, 91 (62.3%) had degenerative aneurysms, 45 (30.8%) were redo operations, and 14 (9.5%) had connective tissue disease. First-stage outcomes: 10.9% 30-day mortality (n = 16); 5.4% stroke (n = 8, 6 disabling, 2 nondisabling; 3 fatal); and 0.6% paraplegia. Outcomes for 113 second-stage procedures (77.3%, n = 97 endovascular [66.4%], n = 16 surgical [10.9%]) were 5.3% and 8.8% 30-day and 180-day mortality; no stroke; 10.6% paraplegia. Median follow-up was 5.7 years (range: 0-18.02 years) median survival was 16.65 years (95% lower confidence limit, 10.06 years) with no significant difference between aneurysm and dissection patients. Freedom from further treatment was 87.0% (95% confidence interval, 79.9%-94.7%) at 5 years and 71.4% (95% confidence interval, 71.4%-84.7%) at 10 years; median time to reintervention was 2.59 years (interquartile range, 0.52-5.20 years) with no difference (P = .22) between dissection and aneurysm groups.

Conclusions

Siena collared graft represents a reliable platform for the treatment of diffuse aneurysmal disease. This device offers the flexibility required in the treatment of extended aortic lesions and guarantees the choice of the most appropriate approach for treatment completion. In this context, the availability of hybrid grafts has not modified the role of this device in arch surgery.

Double fenestrated physician-modified stent-grafts for total aortic arch repair in 50 patients

OBJECTIVE

Our aim was to evaluate the early- and medium-term outcomes of using double fenestrated physician-modified endovascular grafts (PMEGs) for total endovascular aortic arch repair.

METHODS

The present single-center retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data included 50 patients from January 2017 through October 2019, who had undergone thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). The fenestrations were a proximal larger fenestration that incorporated the brachiocephalic trunk and left common carotid artery and a distal smaller fenestration for the left subclavian artery (LSA). Only the LSA fenestration was stented.

RESULTS

The median duration for stent graft modification was 26 ± 6 minutes. Of the 50 patients, 41 were men. The mean patient age was 68 ± 11.5 years. The indications for treatment included degenerative aortic arch aneurysm (n = 17), dissecting aortic arch aneurysm after type A dissection (n = 13), type B dissection (n = 13), aortic ulcer (n = 3), and other pathologies (n = 4). The technical success rate was 94% (47 of 50) overall, and 100% (28 of 28) after a technical modification incorporating a preloaded guide wire for the LSA fenestration (P < .05). The 30-day mortality was 2% (n = 1). Two patients (4%) had a minor stroke with full recovery. One patient (2%) had a type IB and two patients (4%) had a type II endoleak from the LSA. Four patients (8%) required reintervention: one because of a type IB endoleak and three because of access-related complications. All supra-aortic trunks were patent. During a mean follow-up of 16 ± 8.3 months, no conversions to open surgical repair were required and no aortic rupture, paraplegia, or retrograde dissection occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

Using double fenestrated PMEGs for TEVAR is both feasible and effective for total endovascular aortic arch repair, avoiding the need for anatomic and extra-anatomic surgical revascularization. The absence of brachiocephalic trunk stenting was not associated with endoleaks or treatment failure and resulted in a lower stroke risk than alternative strategies. The midterm results suggest that stenting of the brachiocephalic trunk and right common carotid artery might not be necessary for a large proportion of patients undergoing total endovascular aortic arch repair. The persistence of the seal and ongoing durability require assessment in studies with long-term follow-up data available.

Surgical outcome of elective total arch replacement with coronary artery bypass grafting

Purpose

We aimed to compare the surgical outcome between total arch replacement with coronary bypass surgery and that without.

Methods

Between 2008 and 2016, 157 consecutive patients underwent total arch replacement with antegrade cerebral perfusion and moderate hypothermic circulatory arrest using the proximal first approach. They were divided into two groups: total arch replacement with coronary bypass surgery (group 1, n = 38) and that without (group 2, n = 119).

Results

Of the 38 patients in group 1, 37 (97%) were asymptomatic. The left internal thoracic artery and saphenous vein were used in one (2.6%) and 38 (100%) patients, respectively. The mean number of coronary anastomoses was 1.5 ± 1.0. In-hospital mortality rate was 3.8%. Cardiopulmonary bypass time and operation time in group 1 were significantly longer than those in group 2 (336 ± 52 min vs. 276 ± 38 min, P < 0.0001 and 702 ± 122 min vs. 619 ± 94 min, P < 0.0001, respectively). No differences in in-hospital mortality and perioperative myocardial infarction were found between the groups (5.3% vs. 3.4%, P = 0.633 and 0% vs. 1.7%, P = 1.000, respectively). In the multivariate analysis, age (odds ratio, 1.208; 95% confidence interval, 1.041-1.497; P = 0.008) and cardiopulmonary bypass time (odds ratio, 1.019; 95% confidence interval, 1.001-1.041; P = 0.041) were significant determinants of in-hospital mortality.

Conclusions

Although prolonged cardiopulmonary bypass time was a significant determinant of in-hospital mortality, total arch replacement with coronary bypass surgery could be safely performed with favorable outcomes.

Short-term outcomes of modified Y-graft technique in acute type a aortic dissection using the femoral artery bypass and one minute systemic circulatory arrest technique

Objective

Aortic arch replacement in acute type A aortic dissection patients remains the most challenging cardiovascular operation. Herein, we described our modified Y-graft technique using the Femoral Artery Bypass (FAB) and the One Minute Systemic Circulatory Arrest (OSCA) technique, and assessed the short-term outcomes of the patients.

Methods

Between February 2015 and November 2017, 51 patients with acute type A aortic dissection underwent aortic arch replacement. Among them, 23 patients underwent FAB while 28 patients underwent both FAB and OSCA. The intraoperative data and postoperative follow-up data were recorded. The follow-up data of patients with traditional Y-graft technique were collected from previously reported studies.

Results

In the FAB group, two patients died due to pulmonary infection (30-day survival rate, 91.3%), and two patients were paralyzed from the waist down. Hemodialysis was performed for five patients (21.7%) before hospital discharge. Fifteen patients (65.2%) received respiratory support for more than 2-days and eight patients (34.8%) for more than 5-days. These follow-up results were comparable or better than the patients with traditional Y-graft technique. Furthermore, compared to the FAB group, the morbidity due to neurological dysfunction and acute renal failure was significantly reduced in the FAB+OSCA group. Moreover, the respiratory support, length of postoperative stay and ICU stay were shortened.

Conclusions

This study clarified the feasibility of FAB and OSCA technique in modifying Y-graft technique. The acute type A aortic dissection patients showed less surgical complications and favorable short-term outcomes after this surgery.

Total Arch Replacement with Hypothermic Circulatory Arrest, Antegrade Cerebral Perfusion and the Y-graft

This study examines postoperative morbidity and mortality and long-term survival after total arch replacement (TAR) using deep to moderate hypothermic circulatory arrest (HCA), antegrade cerebral perfusion (ACP), and the Y-graft. Seventy-five patients underwent TAR with the Y graft. Deep to moderate HCA was initiated at 18-22°C. ACP was either initiated immediately (early ACP) or after the distal anastomosis was performed (late ACP). The arch vessels were then serially anastomosed to the individual limbs of the Y-graft. The median age was 66 years (range = 32-82). Etiology of aneurysmal dilatation included 20 (27%) patients with medial degenerations, 25 (33%) with chronic dissections, 14 (19%) with acute dissections, 9 (12%) with atherosclerosis and 2 (3%) with Marfan syndrome. In-hospital mortality was 5%. Neurologic complications occurred in 8 (11%) patients; 2 (3%) had strokes and 6 (8%) had transient neurologic deficits. Patients undergoing TAR with moderate hypothermia had a significantly higher incidence of new-onset renal insufficiency (3 [23%] vs [0%], P < 0.001) and TND (3 (23%) vs 3 (5%), P = 0.028) than the profound and deep hypothermia cohort. Excluding the 1 patient who died intraoperatively, 89% (95%CI: 79-94%) were alive at 1 year, 78% at 5 years (95%CI: 66-86%), and 73% at 10 years (95%CI: 59-82%). The combination of deep to moderate HCA, ACP, and the Y-graft is a safe and reproducible technique. Further inquiry is needed to assess if early ACP provides superior clinical outcomes.

Perioperative Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Aortic Arch Reconstruction with Branched Grafts Through a Partial Upper Sternotomy

BACKGROUND

Ministernotomy has been advocated over recent years as an alternative technique for different cardiovascular surgical procedures to reduce the surgical trauma associated with conventional full sternotomy. In recent years, several reports have addressed minimally invasive approaches to the proximal aorta and aortic arch through a partial upper sternotomy (PUS). We reviewed our experience of minimally invasive open aortic arch reconstruction with a branched graft through a PUS.

METHODS

Between February 2016 and December 2018, 22 patients underwent open arch repair through a PUS. Moderate hypothermic circulatory arrest and antegrade selective cerebral perfusion were used for organ protection. The median patient age was 76 years (range, 65-86). Renal insufficiency was observed in 14 patients (64%) and chronic lung disease, in 11 (50%). Total arch replacement was performed in 20 patients (91%), while the remaining 2 (9%) received partial arch replacement with reconstruction of two supraaortic vessels. Aortic valve replacement with a tissue valve or aortic valve repair was each performed concomitantly in one patient (5%) as a concomitant procedure. The median durations of cardiopulmonary bypass, aortic cross-clamping, and circulatory arrest were 214, 109, and 50 min, respectively.

RESULTS

No early deaths, permanent neurological deficits, or spinal cord injuries occurred. One patient (5%) required intraoperative conversion to full sternotomy because of bleeding caused by a venting cannula injury. Three patients (14%) required re-exploration because of bleeding. Prolonged ventilation occurred in 2 patients (9%) with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Minimally invasive aortic arch reconstruction with branched grafts through a PUS can be safely performed with satisfactory perioperative outcomes.

Risk factors of delayed awakening after aortic arch surgery under deep hypothermic circulatory arrest with selective antegrade cerebral perfusion

Background

To determine the risk factors of delayed awakening following aortic arch surgery under deep hypothermic circulatory arrest (DHCA) in combination with selective antegrade cerebral perfusion (SACP).

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of all patients who underwent aortic arch surgery under DHCA + SACP between September 2015 and September 2017 in our hospital. Delayed awakening was defined as recovery of consciousness later than 24 hours after the surgery. Risk factors of delayed awakening were evaluated using multivariate logistic regression analysis.

Results

A total of 168 subjects were included. In-hospital mortality of the overall sample was 19.05% (n=32). Delayed awakening occurred in 76 (45.23%) subjects. Subjects with delayed awakening had older age, hypertension, higher rate of emergency surgery and blood transfusion, and longer cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) time and myocardial blocking time. Multivariate regression analysis showed emergency surgery (P=0.005) and CPB time >240 min (P<0.001) as risk factors for delayed awakening, even after adjusting potential confounders, including age, hypertension, aortic cross-clamp time and blood transfusion.

Conclusions

In patients undergoing aortic arch surgery under DHCA + SACP, emergency surgery and CPB time >240 min are risk factors for delayed awakening.

Intermittent upper and lower body perfusion during circulatory arrest is safe for aortic repair

Introduction:

We report our initial surgical experience of intermittent upper and lower body retrograde perfusion during aortic repair under circulatory arrest.

Methods:

Between 2007 and 2015, 148 consecutive patients underwent surgical aortic repair using moderate hypothermic circulatory arrest with intermittent upper and lower body retrograde perfusion.

Results:

All patients underwent ascending aorta replacement; eight had hemiarch replacement (5.4%) and 92 had aortic root surgery (62.2%). Twenty-nine patients (19.6%) had re-operations and 60 patients (40.5%) had concomitant procedures. The mean duration of circulatory arrest was 23.2 ± 5.4 minutes (range 13-48 minutes). Hospital length of stay was 11.3 ± 16.9 days (median 7.0 days; interquartile range [IQR] 6 days). Complications included death in 0.7%, stroke in 3.4%, respiratory failure in 12.8%, renal replacement therapy in 2.0% and re-exploration for bleeding in 0.7%. Peak renal and hepatic biomarkers were: creatinine 1.2 ± 0.3 mg/dL, aspartate aminotransferase (AST) 291 ± 1112 U/L (IQR 91.8 U/L), alanine aminotransferase (ALT) 212 ± 924 U/L (IQR 43.0 U/L) and total bilirubin 1.2 ± 0.9 mg/dL. Peak lactate was 5.0 ± 3.3 mmol/L (IQR 3.3 mmol/L) and the mean time to normalization (<2 mmol/L) was 14.3 ± 14.0 hours.

Conclusions:

Intermittent upper and lower body retrograde perfusion during circulatory arrest is safe for aortic repair, resulting in low morbidity and mortality. There were only modest rises in hepatic and renal injury biomarkers as well as the rapid clearance of lactate. These findings support the continued study of this technique to reduce end-organ dysfunction during circulatory arrest, including expansion to patients with longer circulatory arrest duration and a direct comparison with conventional circulatory arrest without retrograde upper and lower body perfusion.

Neuroprotective Strategies in Repair and Replacement of the Aortic Arch

Aortic arch surgery is a technical challenge, and cerebral protection during distal anastomosis is a continued topic of controversy and discussion. The physiologic effects of hypothermic arrest and adjunctive cerebral perfusion have yet to be fully defined, and the optimal strategies are still undetermined. This review highlights the historical context, physiological rationale, and clinical efficacy of various neuroprotective strategies during arch operations.

Early results of total arch replacement under partial sternotomy

OBJECTIVE

Partial sternotomy with limited skin incision has been utilized for cardiac surgery. We, therefore, started to apply the partial sternotomy for total arch replacement since 2013 in selected cases. The aim of this study reported the results of our early experiences.

METHODS

Between July 2013 and December 2015, we retrospectively reviewed 15 cases (median age 72, range 67-84, 15 male) who underwent total arch replacement thorough partial sternotomy. All procedures were performed under hypothermic circulatory arrest with selective cerebral perfusion.

RESULTS

Median skin incision was 9 cm (range 7-15 cm, 5.3% of height) and partial sternotomy consisted of 14 upper and 1 lower partial sternotomy (L shape 8 and T shape 7 cases). Median operation time, cardiopulmonary bypass time, ischemic heart time, selective cerebral perfusion time and hypothermic circulatory arrest time were 485 [360-770], 223 [1174-270], 146 [100-163], 154 [116-189], and 69 [45-90] minutes, respectively. Median duration of mechanical ventilator dependent time was 12 h [5-38]. Median length of ICU stay and hospital stay were 3 [1-7], and 18 [13-76] days, respectively. Thirty days and in-hospital mortality were 0% without any neurological complications. There are two aorta-related reoperation due to graft inducing hemolytic anemia and no aorta-related death during follow-up (median 954, range 702-1462 days).

CONCLUSION

The early results of total arch replacement through partial sternotomy were satisfactory. The partial sternotomy could be a good option for total arch replacement in selected patients.

An innovative arch-first surgical procedure under moderate hypothermia for acute type A aortic dissection

BACKGROUND

We hypothesized that the arch-first procedure without extra devices under moderate-to-mild systemic hypothermia during acute type A aortic dissection is safe and efficient and will improve patient outcome compared with the standard total arch replacement technique.

METHODS

From December 2014 to February 2017, 89 patients were enrolled in this study, 52 of whom underwent conventional deep hypothermic circulatory arrest (DHCA, 24.2±0.71 °C) using the antegrade cerebral perfusion surgical procedure (Group A) and 37 of whom underwent the "arch-first" technique with moderate (27.4±1.1 °C) systemic hypothermia during antegrade cerebral perfusion (Group B). The clinical data, surgical and postoperative data, complications, and mortality of the two groups were analyzed.

RESULTS

The cardiopulmonary bypass (171.3±40.0 min) and awakening time (7.0 hours) was significantly decreased in Group B. Two patients died 30 d after surgery (5.4%, two of 37) in Group B. The incidence of transient neurologic deficit (2.7%) and distal organ complications (5.4%) was lower in Group B.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with acute type A aortic dissection involving the arch, the innovative arch-first surgical procedure could provide feasible and safe treatment outcomes, which brings us closer to the goal of performing surgery with moderate-to-mild systemic hypothermia with better cerebral, distal organ, and survival outcomes.

Neuroprotective effect of pressure-oriented flow regulation and pH-stat management in selective antegrade brain perfusion during total aortic arch repair

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to assess the safety and effectiveness of our selective antegrade brain perfusion (SABP) strategy, which is characterized by moderate hypothermic and low-pressure management under pH-stat using a completely closed cardiopulmonary bypass circuit with a single centrifugal pump.

METHODS

Forty-nine consecutive patients (median age, 74) underwent total aortic arch replacement using a 4-branched graft. SABP was conducted with individual cannulation in all arch vessels. The SABP flow rate was monitored, and the flow rates of each arch vessel were also measured in patients with available data.

RESULTS

One patient died of cerebral infarction, and 7 had transient neurological deficits without apparent findings on postoperative imaging studies and without residual sequels at hospital discharge. The operation, cardiopulmonary bypass, cardiac arrest, circulatory arrest and SABP times were 327 min (interquartile range, 292-381), 211 (184-247), 107 (84.8-138.3), 54.0 (48-68) and 137 (114-158), respectively. The total flow of the SABP was 18.1 ml/kg/min (15.7-20.9). The flow rates of the brachiocephalic, the left carotid and the left subclavian arteries were 9.5 ml/kg/min (7.7-11.5), 4.2 (2.8-5.7) and 4.5 (3.7-5.5), respectively. Only the flow rate of the brachiocephalic artery was significantly correlated with the total SABP flow rate (Spearman rank correlation coefficient, r = 0.58, P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The moderate hypothermic, high-flow, low-pressure SABP strategy with pH-stat management can be applied in adult aortic surgery; however, the feasibility and effectiveness of this concept need further evaluation in a prospective controlled study.

Optimal temperature management in aortic arch operations

Hypothermic circulatory arrest is a critical component of aortic arch procedures, without which these operations could not be safely performed. Despite the use of hypothermia as a protective adjunct for organ preservation, aortic arch surgery remains complex and is associated with numerous complications despite years of surgical advancement. Deep hypothermic circulatory arrest affords the surgeon a safe period of time to perform the arch reconstruction, but this interruption of perfusion comes at a high clinical cost: stroke, paraplegia, and organ dysfunction are all potential-associated complications. Retrograde cerebral perfusion was subsequently developed as a technique to improve upon the rates of neurologic dysfunction, but was done with only modest success. Selective antegrade cerebral perfusion, on the other hand, has consistently been shown to be an effective form of cerebral protection over deep hypothermia alone, even during extended periods of circulatory arrest. A primary disadvantage of using deep hypothermic circulatory arrest is the prolonged bypass times required for cooling and rewarming which adds significantly to the morbidity associated with these procedures, especially coagulopathic bleeding and organ dysfunction. In an effort to mitigate this problem, the degree of hypothermia at the time of the initial circulatory arrest has more recently been reduced in multiple centers across the globe. This technique of moderate hypothermic circulatory arrest in combination with adjunctive brain perfusion techniques has been shown to be safe when performing aortic arch operations. In this review, we will discuss the evolution of these protection strategies as well as their relative strengths and weaknesses.

The application of a modified technique of SCP under DHCA during total aortic arch replacement combined with stented elephant trunk implantation

We reviewed the perfusion experiences of 60 cases with a modified technique of selected cerebral perfusion (SCP) under deep hypothermic circulatory arrest (DHCA) during ascending aorta and total aortic arch replacement combined with transaortic stented graft implantation into the descending aorta for acute and chronic type A aortic dissection. Right auxiliary artery cannulation was routinely used for cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and SCP in this procedure. Generally, this technique requires two main pumps for two arterial lines before we applied the modified technique; one for CPB and the other for SCP. In order to simplify the circuit of the extracorporeal circuit (ECC) to operate easily, the arterial line was separated into two branches with a Y–connector on the operating table, one for axillary artery perfusion and the other for graft perfusion connected to the ECC set–up. This method is easy for the perfusionist to install and convenient for the surgeon. This is a safe and simple to use modified technique for SCP under DHCA during ascending aorta and total aortic arch replacement combined with transaortic stented graft implantation into the descending aorta.

Bilateral Axillary Arterial Perfusion in Surgery on Thoracic Aorta

Bilateral axillary arterial cannulation for selective cerebral perfusion might minimize cerebral embolic complications during surgery on the ascending aorta and aortic arch. From March 2002 through February 2004, bilateral axillary arterial perfusion was applied in 12 consecutive patients (mean age, 61.3 years). Operative procedures were total arch replacement in 8 patients, hemiarch replacement in 1, and ascending aorta replacement in 3. Antegrade selective cerebral perfusion was established through vascular grafts anastomosed to the bilateral axillary arteries and a perfusion catheter placed directly into the left carotid artery. Bilateral axillary arterial perfusion through the grafts was successful in all patients. There were no early or late deaths and no incidence of neurologic deficit. There were no complications related to cannulation of the axillary arteries. Bleeding, temporary renal failure, acute respiratory distress syndrome, and graft infection occurred in one patient each; all recovered from these complications. Bilateral axillary arterial perfusion is feasible and effective for brain protection during surgery on the ascending aorta and aortic arch.

Outcomes of Concomitant Total Aortic Arch Replacement with Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

OBJECTIVE

Total aortic arch replacement is a highly invasive procedure. Here, we have investigated patient outcomes following total aortic arch replacement with or without coronary artery bypass grafting.

METHODS

One hundred and eighty-one patients underwent total aortic arch replacement without coronary artery bypass grafting, and 65 underwent with coronary artery bypass grafting. We compared preoperative, operative, and postoperative factors and analyzed survival outcomes. We used univariate and multivariate analyses to determine factors associated with long-term mortality.

RESULTS

Cardiopulmonary bypass and surgical times were significantly longer in the concomitant total aortic arch replacement with coronary artery bypass grafting group. Hospital mortality was 3.3% in the total aortic arch replacement group and 7.7% in the concomitant total aortic arch replacement with coronary artery bypass grafting group. Perioperative myocardial infarction was not seen in either group. There were no significant differences in mortality between the groups. Multivariate analysis revealed preoperative age, ischemic heart disease, and estimated glemerular filtration rate (eGFR) as risk factors affecting long-term mortality, whereas concomitant total aortic arch replacement with coronary artery bypass grafting was not a risk factor.

CONCLUSION

Although patients' backgrounds should be considered, total aortic arch replacement can be concomitantly performed with coronary artery bypass grafting surgery without additional mortality risk.