Survival advantage of stentless aortic bioprostheses

Midterm Outcomes of Stented Versus Stentless Bioprosthetic Valves After Aortic Root Replacement

To determine the impact of aortic root replacement (ARR) with a stentless bioprosthetic valve on midterm outcomes compared to a stented bioprosthetic valve-graft conduit. This was an observational study of aortic root operations from 2010 to 2018. All patients with a complete ARR for nonendocarditis reasons were included, while patients undergoing valve-sparing root replacements or primary aortic valve replacement or repair were excluded. Of the patients with a complete ARR, bioprosthetic valve implants were included, while mechanical valve implants were excluded. Patients were dichotomized into the stented ARR group and the stentless ARR group. A total of 1:1 nearest neighbor propensity matching was employed to assess the association of stentless valves with short-term and midterm outcomes. A total of 455 patients underwent a complete ARR with a bioprosthetic valve implant for nonendocarditis reasons, of which 212 (46.6%) received a stented valve, while 243 (53.4%) received a stentless valve. After matching, postoperative outcomes were similar across each group (P > 0.05), including operative mortality and adverse neurologic events. Median follow-up for the entire cohort was 4.41 years (95% CI: 4.01, 4.95). At 1 year follow-up, aortic regurgitation ≥ 2+ and ejection fraction were similar across each group (P > 0.05); however, the stentless valve group had lower aortic valve velocity and transvalvular pressure gradient. Finally, reoperations and survival were similar for each group over the study's follow-up (P > 0.05). Stentless valves may provide hemodynamic benefits after ARR; however, the clinical impact of those benefits for survival and reoperation may not yet be evident in the midterm.

Stented versus Stentless Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients with Small Aortic Root

Objective

The aim of the study was to compare hemodynamic and perioperative outcomes of stented against stentless aortic valve replacement in patients with small aortic root (21 mm or less).

Methods

A comprehensive search was undertaken among the four major databases (PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Ovid) to identify all randomized and nonrandomized controlled trials comparing stentless to stented bioprosthetic valves in small aortic root patients. Odds ratios, weighted mean differences, or standardized mean differences and their 95% confidence intervals were analyzed.

Results

A total of seven studies with a total of 965 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. There was no significant difference in preoperative baselines including mean age between both groups ( P = 0.08), peak aortic valve gradient ( P = 0.06), and effective orifice area ( P = 0.28), whereas higher mean aortic valve gradient in the stented group ( P = 0.007). No difference in cardiopulmonary bypass time ( P = 0.74), aortic cross-clamp times ( P = 0.88), intensive care unit stay ( P = 0.13), and stroke rate ( P = 0.56) were noted. However, stented group of patients showed higher rate of patient prosthesis mismatch ( P = 0.0001) and longer total hospital stay ( P = 0.002). Postoperatively, stentless group showed lower peak and mean aortic valve gradient ( P = 0.003 and P = 0.008, respectively) with a better effective orifice area ( P < 0.00001) at 6 months of follow-up. Mortality rates while in-hospital and at 1 year were similar in both groups ( P = 0.94 and P = 0.86, respectively).

Conclusions

Stentless aortic valves offer superior short-term hemodynamic outcomes in patients with small aortic root when compared with stented aortic valves. Although both groups have similar perioperative complications rates, stentless valves bring about a shorter hospital stay. A further large multicenter randomized controlled trial should address the longer-term benefit of stentless aortic valve over stented valve.

Influence of the tilt angle of Percutaneous Aortic Prosthesis on Velocity and Shear Stress Fields

Background

Due to the nature of the percutaneous prosthesis deployment process, a variation in its final position is expected. Prosthetic valve placement will define the spatial location of its effective orifice in relation to the aortic annulus. The blood flow pattern in the ascending aorta is related to the aortic remodeling process, and depends on the spatial location of the effective orifice. The hemodynamic effect of small variations in the angle of inclination of the effective orifice has not been studied in detail.

Objective

To implement an in vitro simulation to characterize the hydrodynamic blood flow pattern associated with small variations in the effective orifice inclination.

Methods

A three-dimensional aortic phantom was constructed, reproducing the anatomy of one patient submitted to percutaneous aortic valve implantation. Flow analysis was performed by use of the Particle Image Velocimetry technique. The flow pattern in the ascending aorta was characterized for six flow rate levels. In addition, six angles of inclination of the effective orifice were assessed.

Results

The effective orifice at the -4º and -2º angles directed the main flow towards the anterior wall of the aortic model, inducing asymmetric and high shear stress in that region. However, the effective orifice at the +3º and +5º angles mimics the physiological pattern, centralizing the main flow and promoting a symmetric distribution of shear stress.

Conclusion

The measurements performed suggest that small changes in the angle of inclination of the percutaneous prosthesis aid in the generation of a physiological hemodynamic pattern, and can contribute to reduce aortic remodeling.

A propensity matched analysis of outcomes and long term survival in stented versus stentless valves

BACKGROUND

To compare the perioperative and long term survival after aortic valve replacement using stentless versus stented valves in a large cohort of patients grouped using propensity score matching.

METHODS

From 1991 to 2012, 4,563 patients underwent aortic valve replacement with stentless and stented valves at our institution. Propensity score matching identified 444 pairs using 13 independent variables: incidence of operation, smoking status, renal failure, hypertension, diabetes, peripheral vascular disease, cerebrovascular disease, chronic lung disease, ejection fraction, gender, age, valve status, and use of coronary artery bypass graft. Data were collected from our Society of Thoracic Surgeons database and the Social Security Death Index. Groups were compared using univariate and Kaplan-Meier analysis.

RESULTS

The two groups demonstrated no significant differences for the 13 matching variables and the majority of 30-day outcomes (p > 0.05). The stented valve group showed a higher incidence of postoperative bleeding (3.6% vs 1.1%, p = 0.015), but a lower incidence of stroke (0.9% vs. 2.9%, p = 0.028). One, five, and 10-year survival was 95.0, 80.7, and 52.8% for stented and 93.2, 80.5, and 51.3% for stentless valves. Overall survival did not differ significantly between the two groups (p = 0.641).

CONCLUSIONS

Stentless and stented valves had identical 30-day outcomes except for a higher postoperative incidence of bleeding and a lower incidence of stroke in the stented group. There was no significant difference in long term survival between valve types. Both valves may be used for aortic valve replacement with low morbidity and excellent long term survival.

Continuous Suture Technique for Freedom Stentless Valve: Reduced Crossclamp Time

The Pericarbon Freedom stentless valve has shown excellent hemodynamics. A continuous suture technique at the inflow site may reduce cardiopulmonary bypass and crossclamp times and affect postoperative hemodynamics. In a prospective case-matched study, interrupted and continuous suture line techniques were used in 68 and 71 patients, respectively. Isolated valve replacement was performed in 70.4% of the continuous suture group and 67.6% of the interrupted suture group. Hemodynamic data were obtained by echocardiography (mean and peak gradients, regurgitation) at discharge and after 1 year. Overall mortality was 5.0% and due to non-valve-related causes. Bypass and crossclamp times were shorter by 22.4 and 20.6 min, respectively, in the continuous suture group. The suture technique at the inflow site did not result in significant differences in the mean (11.8 ± 6.3 vs. 12.5 ± 6.2 mm Hg) or peak gradients (21.0 ± 9.6 vs. 22.0 ± 10.9 mm Hg), or degree of regurgitation. Follow-up showed a further decrease in the gradients.

Aortic valve replacement and prosthesis-patient mismatch in the era of trans-catheter aortic valve implantation

Objective

The treatment strategy for aortic stenosis (AS) has been changing due to newly developed valvular prostheses and trans-catheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). To determine the role of new modalities for AS with a small aortic root, papers using the concept of prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPM) were reviewed.

Methods

First, to determine the cut-off value of the indexed effective orifice area (IEOA) for defining PPM, the studies of surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) with a follow-up longer than 5 years and a patient number larger than 500 were reviewed. Second, the papers comparing TAVI and SAVR were reviewed. Furthermore, the prevalence of PPM was reviewed, with the addition of papers on aortic root enlargement, sutureless AVR, and aortic valve reconstruction with autologous pericardium.

Results and conclusion

The results of the long-term survival after aortic valve replacement (AVR) have indicated that an IEOA less than 0.65 cm²/m² should be avoided in all cases, whereas the indications for patients with an IEOA between 065 and 0.85 cm²/m² should be determined by considering multiple factors. A large body size and younger age have a significantly negative influence on the long-term survival. In Asian population, the prevalence of PPM was low, despite the fact that the size of the aortic annulus was small. The IEOA after TAVI was larger than after surgical AVR in population-matched studies. To evaluate the role of TAVI and other modalities for a small aortic root, studies with a longer follow-up and larger volume are thus warranted.

North American trial results at 1 year with the Sorin Freedom SOLO pericardial aortic valve

OBJECTIVES

A North American prospective, 15-centre Food and Drug Administration (FDA) valve trial was designed to assess the safety and effectiveness of the Freedom SOLO stentless pericardial aortic valve in the treatment of surgical aortic valve disease.

METHODS

Beginning in 2010, 251 patients (mean: 74.7 ± 7.5 years), were recruited in the Freedom SOLO aortic valve trial. One hundred eighty-nine patients have been followed for at least 1 year and are the basis for this review. Preoperatively, 54% of patients had NYHA functional class III or IV symptoms, and the majority of patients had a normal ejection fraction (EF) (median EF = 61%). Concomitant procedures were performed in 61.9% of patients, with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) (48.7%) being the most common followed by a MAZE procedure (13.7%). Reoperations were performed in 8.5% of patients in the study.

RESULTS

The entire cohort of 251 patients enrolled had 7 deaths prior to 30 days, 2 of which were valve-related (aspiration pneumonia and sudden death) and 5 were not valve-related. There were 11 deaths after 30 days, 1 valve-related (unknown cardiac death) and 10 not valve-related. Five valves were explanted, 3 early (endocarditis, acute insufficiency and possible root dissection) and 2 late (endocarditis). Thirty-day adverse events include arrhythmias requiring permanent pacemaker (4.2%), thromboembolic events (3.7%) and thrombocytopenia (7.4%). One-year follow-up of all 189 patients demonstrated mean gradients for valve sizes 19, 21, 23, 25 and 27 mm of 11.7, 7.8, 6.3, 4.6 and 5.0 mmHg, respectively. Effective orifice areas for the same valve sizes were 1.2, 1.3, 1.6, 1.8 and 1.9 cm(2), respectively. Ninety-six percent of patients (181/189) were in NYHA class I or II at the 1-year follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

The Freedom SOLO stentless pericardial aortic valve demonstrated excellent haemodynamics and a good safety profile out to the 1 year of follow-up.

Clinical evaluation of new heart valve prostheses: update of objective performance criteria

This article summarizes the long-term clinical results of the Food and Drug Administration-approved heart valves, provides current updates to the objective performance criteria (OPC) used to evaluate new heart valve prostheses, and documents the steps that the International Organization for Standardization Committee used to arrive at the updated OPC. Data were extracted from 19 Food and Drug Administration summaries of safety and effectiveness data reports (31 series) and 56 literature articles (85 series) published from 1999 to 2012. The OPC were calculated for five valve-related complications by valve type (mechanical and bioprosthetic) and valve position (aortic and mitral).

Stentless aortic valve replacement: current status and future trends

Stentless aortic xenografts were introduced into clinical practice as aortic valve substitutes over a decade ago. Stentless prosthetic valves were expected to provide enhanced durability and more physiologic hemodynamic behavior when compared with stented bioprostheses. Whilst the former expectation has not been fulfilled, partly due to concomitantly improved durability of second-generation stented bioprostheses, the latter has consistently been satisfied in early and late clinical observation. Evidence is accumulating suggesting improved long-term survival due to more timely and thorough regression of ventricular hypertrophy. In addition, stentless xenografts have shown extreme versatility when adopted in a variety of complex clinical conditions associated with aortic valve disease, including small aortic anulus, ascending aortic aneurysm, endocarditis and left ventricular dysfunction. Future research in the form of prospective, multicenter, randomized trials must address the issues of very long-term durability and survival, while simplification in valve design is required to promote wider use of stentless valves.

Long-Term Clinical and Echocardiographic Follow-Up of the Freestyle Stentless Aortic Bioprosthesis

Background—

Stentless aortic bioprostheses were designed to provide enhanced hemodynamic performance and potentially greater longevity. The present report describes the outcomes of patients with the Freestyle stentless bioprosthesis followed for ≤18 years.

Methods and Results—

Between 1993 and 2011, 430 patients underwent primary aortic valve replacement with a Freestyle bioprosthesis in the subcoronary position. Mean age was 68.2±8.2 years. All of the clinical and echocardiographic data were collected prospectively. Mean overall follow-up was 9.1±4.4 years and was complete in all of the patients. In-hospital mortality was 3.5% (n=15). Overall, 10- and 15-year survival were 60.7% and 35.0%, respectively. Fifty-one patients required reoperation during follow-up, including 27 for structural valve deterioration (SVD). Overall, freedom from reoperation was 91.0% and 75.0% at 10 and 15 years, whereas freedom from reoperation for SVD was 95.9% and 82.3%, respectively. At 10 and 15 years, freedom from reoperation for SVD was 94.0% and 62.6% for patients <60 years of age and 96.3% and 88.4% for patients ≥60 years of age ( P =0.002). The median time to explant for SVD was 10.7 years. SVD presented mostly as acute, severe aortic insufficiency attributed to leaflet tear (77.8%). The independent risk factors for reoperation for SVD were age <60 years ( P =0.001) and dyslipidemia ( P =0.02).

Conclusions—

Aortic valve replacement with the Freestyle bioprosthesis in a subcoronary position provides good long-term clinical and echocardiographic outcomes for patients >60 years of age. Severe aortic insufficiency with leaflet tear is the major mode of SVD leading to reoperation in these patients.

Stentless aortic valve replacement: an update

Although porcine aortic valves or pericardial tissue mounted on a stent have made implantation techniques easier, these valves sacrifice orifice area and increase stress at the attachment of the stent, which causes primary tissue failure. Optimizing hemodynamics to prevent patient–prosthetic mismatch and improve durability, stentless bioprostheses use was revived in the early 1990s. The purpose of this review is to provide a current overview of stentless valves in the aortic position. Retrospective and prospective randomized controlled studies showed similar operative mortality and morbidity in stented and stentless aortic valve replacement (AVR), though stentless AVR required longer cross-clamp and cardiopulmonary bypass time. Several cohort studies showed improved survival after stentless AVR, probably due to better hemodynamic performance and earlier left ventricular (LV) mass regression compared with stented AVR. However, there was a bias of operation age and nonrandomization. A randomized trial supported an improved 8-year survival of patients with the Freestyle or Toronto valves compared with Carpentier–Edwards porcine valves. On the contrary, another randomized study did not show improved clinical outcomes up to 12 years. Freedom from reoperation at 12 years in Toronto stentless porcine valves ranged from 69% to 75%, which is much lower than for Carpentier–Edwards Perimount valves. Cusp tear with consequent aortic regurgitation was the most common cause of structural valve deterioration. Cryolife O’Brien valves also have shorter durability compared with stent valves. Actuarial freedom from reoperation was 44% at 10 years. Early prosthetic valve failure was also reported in patients who underwent root replacement with Shelhigh stentless composite grafts. There was no level I or IIa evidence of more effective orifice area, mean pressure gradient, LV mass regression, surgical risk, durability, and late outcomes in stentless bioprostheses. There is no general recommendation to prefer stentless bioprostheses in all patients. For new-generation pericardial stentless valves, follow-up over 15 years is necessary to compare the excellent results of stented valves such as the Carpentier–Edwards Perimount and Hancock II valves.

Implantation technique and early echocardiographic performance of newly designed stentless mitral bioprosthesis

This article describes the implantation techniques of two new stentless mitral bioprosthesis and their early echocardiographic performance in 12 acute sheep model. The first stentless mitral bioprosthesis (stentless bileaflet valve [SBV]) was designed as a bileaflet valve with sewing ring to suture down to the native mitral annulus. The other one (SBV with chordae) has two chordae-like structures to be attached to the head of the native papillary muscles. Valvar performance and cardiac function were evaluated by epicardial echocardiography at postimplant (Rest) and during dobutamine (DOB) stimulation. Postimplant echocardiography revealed normal leaflet opening with a large orifice area and unrestricted leaflets motion. In both valves, leaflet closure showed no systolic anterior motion, prolapse, or tethering. Mitral regurgitation grade 2 or higher was not detected in any of the experiments. Transvalvar pressure gradients at Rest and DOB were 2.3 ± 1.6 mm Hg and 2.5 ± 2.2 mm Hg in SBV and 1.8 ± 1.1 mm Hg and 2.3 ± 1.2 mm Hg in SBV with chordae, respectively. Both stentless bioprosthesis showed reliable valve performance and preserved cardiac function in the acute phase. Further chronic study is needed to evaluate the reliability of implantation procedures, valvar performance, and biocompatibility.

In vitro assessment of flow patterns and turbulence intensity in prosthetic heart valves using generalized phase-contrast MRI

PURPOSE

To assess in vitro the three-dimensional mean velocity field and the extent and degree of turbulence intensity (TI) in different prosthetic heart valves using a generalization of phase-contrast MRI (PC-MRI).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Four 27-mm aortic valves (Björk-Shiley Monostrut tilting-disc, St. Jude Medical Standard bileaflet, Medtronic Mosaic stented and Freestyle stentless porcine valve) were tested under steady inflow conditions in a Plexiglas phantom. Three-dimensional PC-MRI data were acquired to measure the mean velocity field and the turbulent kinetic energy (TKE), a direction-independent measure of TI.

RESULTS

Velocity and TI estimates could be obtained up- and downstream of the valves, except where metallic structure in the valves caused signal void. Distinct differences in the location, extent, and peak values of velocity and TI were observed between the valves tested. The maximum values of TKE varied between the different valves: tilting disc, 100 J/m(3); bileaflet, 115 J/m(3); stented, 200 J/m(3); stentless, 145 J/m(3).

CONCLUSION

The TI downstream from a prosthetic heart valve is dependent on the specific valve design. Generalized PC-MRI can be used to quantify velocity and TI downstream from prosthetic heart valves, which may allow assessment of these aspects of prosthetic valvular function in postoperative patients.

Stentless versus Stented Bioprosthetic Aortic Valves

Objective

This meta-analysis sought to determine whether stentless bioprosthetic valves improve clinical and resource outcomes compared with stented valves in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement.

Methods

A comprehensive search was undertaken to identify all randomized and nonrandomized controlled trials comparing stentless to stented bioprosthetic valves in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement available up to March 2008. The primary outcomes were clinical and resource outcomes in randomized controlled trial (RCT). Secondary outcomes clinical and resource outcomes in nonrandomized controlled trial (non-RCT). Odds ratios (OR), weighted mean differences (WMD), or standardized mean differences and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) were analyzed as appropriate.

Results

Seventeen RCTs published in 23 articles involving 1317 patients, and 14 non-RCTs published in 18 articles involving 2485 patients were included in the meta-analysis. For the primary analysis of randomized trials, mortality for stentless versus stented valve groups did not differ at 30 days (OR 1.36, 95% CI 0.68–2.72), 1 year (OR 1.01, 95% CI 0.55–1.85), or 2 to 10 years follow-up (OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.50–1.33). Aggregate event rates for all-cause mortality at 30 days were 3.7% versus 2.9%, at 1 year were 5.5% versus 5.9% and at 2 to 10 years were 17% versus 19% for stentless versus stented valve groups, respectively. Stroke or neurologic complications did not differ between stentless (3.6%) and stented (4.0%) valve groups. Risk of prosthesis-patient mismatch was numerically lower in the stentless group (11.0% vs. 31.3%, OR 0.30, 95% CI 0.05–1.66), but this parameter was reported in few trials and did not reach statistical significance. Effective orifice area index was significantly greater for stentless aortic valve compared with stented valves at 30 days (WMD 0.12 cm2/m2), at 2 to 6 months (WMD 0.15 cm2/m2), and at 1 year (WMD 0.26 cm2/m2). Mean gradient at 1 month was significantly lower in the stentless valve group (WMD −6 mm Hg), at 2 to 6 month follow-up (WMD −4 mm Hg,), at 1 year follow-up (WMD −3 mm Hg) and up to 3 year follow-up (WMD −3 mm Hg) compared with the stented valve group. Although the left ventricular mass index was generally lower in the stentless group versus the stented valve group, the aggregate estimates of mean difference did not reach significance during any time period of follow-up (1 month, 2–6 months, 1 year, and 8 years).

Conclusions

Evidence from randomized trials shows that subcoronary stentless aortic valves improve hemodynamic parameters of effective orifice area index, mean gradient, and peak gradient over the short and long term. These improvements have not led to proven impact on patient morbidity, mortality, and resource-related outcomes; however, few trials reported on clinical outcomes beyond 1 year and definitive conclusions are not possible until sufficient evidence addresses longer-term effects.

Assessment of fluctuating velocities in disturbed cardiovascular blood flow: in vivo feasibility of generalized phase-contrast MRI

PURPOSE

To evaluate the feasibility of generalized phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging (PC-MRI) for the noninvasive assessment of fluctuating velocities in cardiovascular blood flow.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Multidimensional PC-MRI was used in a generalized manner to map mean flow velocities and intravoxel velocity standard deviation (IVSD) values in one healthy aorta and in three patients with different cardiovascular diseases. The acquired data were used to assess the kinetic energy of both the mean (MKE) and the fluctuating (TKE) velocity field.

RESULTS

In all of the subjects, both mean and fluctuating flow data were successfully acquired. The highest TKE values in the patients were found at sites characterized by abnormal flow conditions. No regional increase in TKE was found in the normal aorta.

CONCLUSION

PC-MRI IVSD mapping is able to detect flow abnormalities in a variety of human cardiovascular conditions and shows promise for the quantitative assessment of turbulence. This approach may assist in clarifying the role of disturbed hemodynamics in cardiovascular diseases.

Aortic valve replacement: choice between mechanical valves and bioprostheses

BACKGROUND

The choice between a mechanical or bioprosthetic valve replacement device is not always clear, although patient age is most often the determining factor. We reviewed our experience with patients undergoing aortic valve replacement (AVR) in order to assess and compare long-term outcomes between patients receiving a mechanical valve and those receiving a bioprosthesis.

METHODS

Three hundred fifty-two patients underwent AVR with or without coronary artery bypass between 1993 and 2004: 189 received a mechanical valve and 163 a bioprosthesis. Events included: late mortality, thrombo-embolic events, stroke, bleeding events, valve thrombosis, endocarditis, reoperation, and coronary catheterization.

RESULTS

Patients in the bioprosthesis group were older (71 +/- 11 vs. 65 +/- 13) than in the mechanical group (p < 0.0001). There was no difference in operative mortality (6.8%) or morbidity. Follow-up (61 +/- 40 months) was available in 87%. For mechanical valves and bioprostheses, respectively: 3-, 5-, and 10-year survival was 92%, 86%, and 69% versus 90%, 86%, and 71% (p = n.s.); and event-free survival was 79%, 68%, and 41% versus 79%, 68%, and 44% (p = n.s.). Five patients (3%) in each group required re-replacement of their aortic valve (p = n.s.). Coronary artery disease requiring bypass surgery did not affect long-term survival. Age at operation and renal failure were the only predictors for late mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Survival and event-free survival are similar for patients receiving a mechanical or biological aortic valve substitute. Selection of a valve replacement device should be based on life expectancy, patient preference, ability to take anticoagulants, lifestyle, risk of bleeding, and risk of reoperation. Patient age alone should not be the determining factor.

Stented versus Stentless Bioprostheses in Aortic Valve Stenosis: Effect on Left Ventricular Remodelling

BACKGROUND

Whether the use of stentless aortic bioprostheses improves hemodynamics more than stented bioprostheses in the small aortic root is still a matter of debate.

METHODS

Early- and mid-term effects were compared between 2 different types of stentless bioprotheses and 1 type of stented bioprosthesis for left ventricular remodelling. The effects of the bioprotheses were studied by echocardiography in 68 patients (age, 74 +/- 7 years) with aortic annulus diameter < or =23 mm who were undergoing prosthesis implantation due to aortic isolated stenosis. Stented bioprostheses (Carpentier-Edwards Perimount [CEP]) were implanted in 36 subjects and stentless bioprostheses (18 Toronto SPV and 14 Shelhigh Super Stentless) were implanted in 32 subjects.

RESULTS

A progressive and similar decrease in left ventricular mass of 30% was observed in both stented and stentless bioprostheses at 12 months. A progressive increase in transprosthetic effective orifice area and a decrease in transprothetic pressure gradient were observed at 3, 6, and 12 months in the Toronto group, but these variables showed improvement only at 3 months in the CEP and Shelhigh groups. No mortality occurred during surgery or during the 1-year follow-up period.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results confirmed good feasibility of aortic stented and stentless bioprostheses implantation in the elderly population. A 30% decrease in left ventricular mass occurred in the early- and mid-term (12 months) periods after surgery with all 3 types of bioprostheses. Advantages consisting of a progressive increase in transprosthetic effective orifice area and a decrease of the transprosthetic pressure gradient were observed in the Toronto group in comparison to the CEP and Shelhigh groups. These observations may help surgeons in choosing bioprostheses.

Acute in vivo evaluation of a new stentless mitral valve

OBJECTIVES

We have developed a stentless pericardial mitral valve prosthesis in 2 configurations; the purposes of this acute study in sheep were to assess (1) valve design and implant technique; (2) valve performance; and (3) acute effects on postimplant left ventricular function.

METHODS

A stentless bovine pericardial bileaflet valve was developed with the intent to preserve annular-papillary muscle continuity. This valve, in 2 configurations-with (n = 5) and without (n = 5) flap chordae-was implanted in 10 sheep (mean weight 73 +/- 9 kg). Epicardial echocardiography was performed to assess valve performance. Load-independent left ventricular function was also estimated before implantation (baseline), 1 hour after discontinuing cardiopulmonary bypass (rest), and during dobutamine stimulation using conductance technology.

RESULTS

Implantation was easily accomplished for both configurations. Both configurations had low transvalvular pressure (mean 2.1 +/- 1.2 mm Hg at rest; 2.2 +/- 1.0 mm Hg with dobutamine stimulation with flap chordae; 1.7 +/- 0.5 mm Hg and 1.6 +/- 0.3 mm Hg without flap chordae). No mitral regurgitation was observed in 8 sheep, and mild regurgitation was seen in 2 sheep. Compared with baseline, slope of maximum rate of change of left ventricular pressure-end-diastolic volume relation increased with stimulation both with flap chordae (+52 +/- 41 mm Hg x s(-1)x mL(-1), P = .0005) and without (+20 +/- 12 mm Hg x s(-1) x mL(-1), P = .003).

CONCLUSIONS

Both configurations of this newly designed stentless mitral bioprosthesis, which preserves annular-papillary muscle continuity using different novel surgical implantation techniques, demonstrated reliable valve performance, with low transvalvular pressure gradients, minimal regurgitation, and acutely preserved postimplant left ventricular function. Further chronic study is needed to verify these results and evaluate reliability of implantation procedures, biocompatibility, and durability.

Stentless valves for aortic valve replacement: where do we stand?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Following more than a decade's experience with stentless valves and the development of better profiled stented valves, the article discusses the advantages of stentless valves regarding hemodynamic performance, left ventricular mass regression, durability and survival.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent studies show that stentless valves remain hemodynamically superior compared with modern porcine stented valves. This superiority is, however, rarely reported in comparison with modern pericardial stented valves. In general, patient-prosthesis mismatch is less frequent in stentless vs. stented valves. Recent randomized trials comparing stentless valves and modern stented valves show equivalent left ventricular mass regression at 1 year. At 10 years, stentless valve durability is excellent and comparable with that of stented valves. Recent comparative studies do not confirm the previously reported midterm survival advantages of stentless valves.

SUMMARY

Improvement of stented valves has significantly reduced the hemodynamic differences between them and their stentless counterpart. Patients with small aortic annulus, however, should benefit from a stentless valve due to the better expected gradients and lower risk of patient-prosthesis mismatch. Midterm results suggest equivalent durability and survival for both prosthesis types but additional and longer-term trials are necessary to confirm these results.

Root Replacement Using Stentless Valves in the Small Aortic Root: A Propensity Score Analysis

BACKGROUND

Root replacement using a stentless bioprosthesis may be the optimal approach to avoid patient-prosthesis mismatch in patients with a small aortic root. Primary root replacement, however, is considered to be associated with increased surgical risk. We compared early outcome of full root replacement with a stentless bioprosthesis with that of aortic valve replacement with a stented bioprosthesis using propensity score-matching analysis.

METHODS

Of 231 patients undergoing elective, first-time aortic valve replacement with a small root (< or = 22 mm), 120 patients were selected using propensity score-matching analysis. They underwent either root replacement using a 23-mm stentless bioprosthesis (stentless group, n = 60) or supra-annular aortic valve replacement using a 21-mm stented bioprosthesis (stented group, n = 60). Preoperative characteristics and frequency of concomitant operations were identical.

RESULTS

Duration of operation (196 +/- 54 versus 174 +/- 49 minutes), cardiopulmonary bypass (112 +/- 36 versus 91 +/- 33 minutes), and aortic cross-clamping (76 +/- 21 versus 61 +/- 21 minutes) were significantly longer in the stentless group. However, the need for perioperative transfusion and the incidence of postoperative reexploration for bleeding (3% versus 8%) was lower, and ventilation time was shorter. Mean duration of intensive care and hospital stay were also significantly shorter (2.3 +/- 1.7 versus 4.0 +/- 3.9 days, 8.9 +/- 3.1 versus 12.4 +/- 5.7 days). In-hospital mortality was identical (5% each). No independent predictor for in-hospital mortality was identified.

CONCLUSIONS

Full root replacement using a stentless bioprosthesis does not increase postoperative morbidity or mortality of aortic valve replacement and may be advantageous in patients with a small aortic root.

Long-term results after aortic valve replacement with the Bravo 400 stentless xenograft

BACKGROUND

This study was undertaken to evaluate the long-term clinical and echocardiographic outcome after aortic valve replacement with the Bravo Cardiovascular Model 400 stentless xenograft.

METHODS

Between February 1992 and January 1994, 67 patients underwent aortic valve replacement with the Bravo 400 bioprosthesis. The valvular pathology was aortic stenosis in 36 patients (53.7%), aortic insufficiency in 17 patients (25.4%), and mixed lesion in 14 patients (20.9%). Mean follow-up time was 9.8 +/- 2.73 years and median follow-up time was 11 years. Cumulative follow-up time was 659 patients-years and was 94% complete.

RESULTS

No early deaths were observed. Overall survival estimates at 11 years were 74.71% +/- 5.47%. The actuarial freedom from valve-related death at 11 years was 91.04% +/- 3.84%; from cardiac-related death at 11 years it was 87.95% +/- 4.29%; and from noncardiac death at 11 years it was 85.14% +/- 4.58%. Eleven-year Kaplan-Meier survival of patients younger than 65 years was 90.91% +/- 6.13% versus 66.08% +/- 7.38% for older patients (p = 0.0307, log-rank test). The actuarial freedom from all valve-related morbidity and mortality at 11 years was 80.3% +/- 5.4%. The mean transvalvular gradient decreased significantly after aortic valve replacement with a corresponding increase in effective orifice area. Left ventricular mass index at 10-year follow-up was 68.5% of the preoperative value.

CONCLUSIONS

The Bravo Cardiovascular Model 400 stentless xenograft has provided good clinical and hemodynamic results up until 11 years of follow-up.

Structural deterioration of the Freestyle aortic valve: Mode of presentation and mechanisms

BACKGROUND

Structural valve deterioration is the major cause of bioprosthetic valve failure. Because of the unique design features and anti-calcification treatment of the Freestyle (Medtronic Inc, Minneapolis, Minn) stentless bioprosthesis, development of structural valve deterioration may differ in comparison with other bioprosthetic valves. This study evaluates the mechanisms and clinical presentation of structural valve deterioration in the Freestyle stentless bioprosthesis.

METHODS

Between January 1993 and August 2005, 608 patients underwent aortic valve replacement with a Freestyle stentless bioprosthesis. The implantation technique was subcoronary in 475 patients and a root replacement in 133 patients. Mean overall follow-up was 5.6 +/- 3.4 years. Follow-up was complete in all patients. Clinical and echocardiographic follow-ups were conducted prospectively.

RESULTS

Freedom from structural valve deterioration was 95.8% at 10 years. Twelve patients showed evidence of structural valve deterioration and underwent reoperation for aortic regurgitation (n = 10) or aortic stenosis (n = 2). The mean age of patients with structural valve deterioration was significantly lower than patients without structural valve deterioration (62.6 +/- 8.2 years vs 68.6 +/- 8.3 years, P = .02). The median time between implantation and explantation was 8.7 years (range: 1.9-13.3 years). Eleven structural valve deteriorations occurred after subcoronary implantation, and 1 structural valve deterioration occurred after root implantation (P = .4). The mechanisms of structural valve deterioration were leaflet tears in 10 patients (6 in the left coronary cusp and 4 in the right coronary cusp), severe valve calcification in 1 patient, and cusp fibrosis in 1 patient. The interval between onset of symptoms and reoperation was acute or subacute in 10 patients.

CONCLUSION

At 10 years, the Freestyle stentless bioprosthesis shows excellent freedom from structural valve deterioration. Structural valve deterioration in the Freestyle stentless bioprosthesis relates to leaflet tear with minimal calcification in the majority of cases. Because of the fast onset of symptoms with leaflet tear, patients with a Freestyle stentless bioprosthesis should be informed of the preferential mode of failure and time-frame of symptoms.

Heart valve replacement: which valve for which patient?

The ideal heart valve substitute would show no deterioration or thrombogenicity, offer no resistance to blood flow, and be easy to implant. However, such a valve does not exist and we must accept compromises in some of these qualities based on our patients' needs. In selection of cardiac valve prosthesis, valve-related factors such as durability, thrombogenicity, and fluid dynamics should be carefully matched to patient-related factors such as age, size, life expectancy, comorbidities, plans for pregnancy, and lifestyle. In addition, surgeon- or operation-related factors should be considered. Technical aspects of implantation, ease of reoperation, and operative mortalities may tip the risk and benefit balance in a particular direction. We review currently available heart valve prostheses and the clinical factors that are involved in selection of a heart valve substitute.

Carpentier-Edwards PERIMOUNT Magna bioprosthesis: A stented valve with stentless performance?

OBJECTIVE

We designed this study to evaluate the early hemodynamic performance of the recently introduced Carpentier-Edwards PERIMOUNT Magna bioprosthesis (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, Calif) and compare it with those of the conventional Carpentier-Edwards PERIMOUNT stented bioprosthesis (Edwards Lifesciences) and Edwards Prima Plus porcine stentless bioprosthesis (Edwards Lifesciences).

METHODS

Sixty-three patients (>70 years old) were enrolled in this prospective, randomized study. At operation, once the annulus had been measured, the best size suitable was assessed for each of the three valves before random assignment. Transthoracic echocardiography was performed before discharge to evaluate early postoperative hemodynamic performances of the different valves implanted.

RESULTS

The best size suitable of Edwards Prima Plus (24.3 +/- 1.7 mm) was significantly superior to those of both the Carpentier-Edwards PERIMOUNT Magna (23.4 +/- 2.1 mm) and Carpentier-Edwards PERIMOUNT (22.4 +/- 1.8 mm). The best size suitable of the Carpentier-Edwards PERIMOUNT Magna, however, was significantly superior to that of the Carpentier-Edwards PERIMOUNT. Furthermore the best size suitable of the Carpentier-Edwards PERIMOUNT Magna was equal to the measured annulus in 55% of patients, as opposed to 25% for the Carpentier-Edwards PERIMOUNT (P < .001). Mean implanted labeled size of the Edwards Prima Plus was significantly higher than those of both the Carpentier-Edwards PERIMOUNT Magna and the Carpentier-Edwards PERIMOUNT (24.6 +/- 1.9 mm, 23.1 +/- 1.9 mm, and 22.5 +/- 1.8 mm, respectively). Early postoperative hemodynamic performance of the Carpentier-Edwards PERIMOUNT Magna, however, was superior to those of both the Edwards Prima Plus and the Carpentier-Edwards PERIMOUNT in both effective orifice area index (1.07 +/- 0.4 cm2/m2, 0.87 +/- 0.3 cm2/m2, and 0.80 +/- 0.2 cm2/m2, respectively) and mean peak gradient (20 +/- 6 mm Hg, 27 +/- 8 mm Hg, and 28 +/- 12 mm Hg, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The improved design of the recently introduced third-generation stented bioprosthesis Carpentier-Edwards PERIMOUNT Magna allows implantation of a significantly bigger valve than with the old generation. Furthermore, the improved hemodynamic performance of the Carpentier-Edwards PERIMOUNT Magna compares favorably with both the Carpentier-Edwards PERIMOUNT and the Edwards Prima Plus.

Mid term outcome and quality of life after aortic valve replacement in elderly people: mechanical versus stentless biological valves

OBJECTIVE

To assess the benefit for patients older than 65 years of aortic valve replacement with stentless biological heart valves in comparison with mechanical valves.

DESIGN

Multiple regression analysis of a retrospective follow up study.

SETTING

Single cardiothoracic centre.

PATIENTS

Between 1996 and 2001, 392 patients with a mean age of 74 years underwent aortic valve replacement with stentless Freestyle bioprostheses or mechanical St Jude Medical prostheses.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Operative mortality and morbidity, postoperative morbid events, mid term survival, and New York Heart Association (NYHA) class improvement, and quality of life.

RESULTS

No significant differences were found between patients receiving stentless biological valves and patients receiving mechanical prostheses. However, analysis of subgroups showed that patients older than 75 years with mechanical valves had an increased risk of major bleeding events (p = 0.007). Patients requiring anticoagulation by means of coumarin had a twofold increased risk of an impaired emotional reaction (p = 0.052). However, for patients who received a mechanical valve for severe combined aortic valve disease a survival advantage (p = 0.045) and a decreased risk of prolonged ventilation (p = 0.001) was observed. On the other hand, patients receiving a stentless bioprosthesis had an increased risk of a prolonged stay in intensive care (p = 0.04) and stroke (p = 0.01) if they had severely reduced cardiac function (NYHA class IV).

CONCLUSIONS

Elderly people receiving stentless bioprostheses benefit emotionally because of the avoidance of coumarin. However, in patients with severe hypertrophied ventricles and extraordinary calcifications, stentless bioprostheses should be chosen with caution.

Stentless vs. stented aortic valve replacement: left ventricular mass regression

The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the time-related regression of left ventricular hypertrophy after stentless vs. stented aortic valve replacement. From January 1992 to December 2002, 145 patients had a Toronto stentless porcine valve and 106 had a stented Carpentier-Edwards aortic valve replacement. Over a 10-year follow-up, survival was superior in the Toronto group vs. the Carpentier-Edwards group (84% vs. 74% at 4 years; 78% vs. 68% at 6 years; p < 0.001). A significant and constant reduction of peak and mean transvalvular gradients after valve replacement resulted in substantial regression of left ventricular mass index in both groups, which did not reach statistical significance. However, this phenomenon stopped at 3 years, and left ventricular mass index increased slowly after 5 years. Stentless and stented bioprostheses both showed good early and late clinical and hemodynamic outcomes, with the advantage of better midterm survival for stentless xenografts.

Prevention of Calcification of Bioprosthetic Heart Valve Cusp and Aortic Wall With Ethanol and Aluminum Chloride

BACKGROUND

Calcification is frequently associated with device failure of bioprostheses fabricated from either glutaraldehyde pretreated porcine aortic valves or bovine pericardium. It was hypothesized that differential pretreatment with ethanol-aluminum chloride will prove safe and efficacious for inhibiting the calcification of both the porcine aortic valve bioprosthetic cusp and the aortic wall.

METHODS

Glutaraldehyde-fixed porcine aortic valves were subjected to differential aluminum chloride (AlCl3) and ethanol pretreatment; aortic wall segments were treated exclusively with AlCl3 (0.1 moles/L) for 45 minutes, 6 hours, or 8 hours (groups 3A, B, and C, respectively), followed by valve cusp incubations in ethanol (80%, pH 7.4). Nontreated control bioprosthetic valves were either stent-mounted porcine aortic valve bioprostheses (Carpentier-Edwards, group 1) (Edwards, Santa Anna, CA) or St. Jude Toronto SPV valves (St. Jude Medical, St. Paul, MN) (group 2). Mitral valve replacements were carried out in juvenile sheep for 150 days.

RESULTS

Calcium in cusps from group 3A was 2.84 +/- 0.62 mg calcium/g tissue versus control, 22.79 +/- 8.46 mg calcium/g tissue, p = 0.04. Valves pretreated with AlCl3 for 45 minutes, 6 hours, and 8 hours had significantly lower levels of calcium in the aortic wall compared to controls (40.38 +/- 5.66, 26.77 +/- 4.02, and 28.94 +/- 8.25 mg calcium/g tissue for groups 3A, 3B, and 3C, respectively, vs 95.47 +/- 17.14 mg calcium/g tissue for group 1, p < 0.001, and 133.42 +/- 3.96 mg calcium/g tissue for group 2, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Differentially applied ethanol and aluminum chloride pretreatment significantly inhibited calcification of both the glutaraldehyde-fixed porcine aortic valve bioprosthetic cusp and the aortic wall.

Influence of valve prosthesis type on the recovery of ventricular dysfunction and subendocardial ischaemia following valve replacement for aortic stenosis

BACKGROUND

Long-standing aortic stenosis (AS) causes significant progressive left ventricular (LV) dysfunction and may result in subendocardial ischaemia. Following aortic valve surgery, LV function may improve and this may be accompanied by reversal of ischaemia. There is debate about the differential effects of valve substitutes.

METHODS

We studied 33 patients with significant AS and impaired LV systolic function. Patients underwent trans-thoracic Doppler echocardiography and 12-lead electrocardiography pre-operatively, prior to discharge from hospital and at 2.5 (range 1.5-3) years follow-up.

RESULTS

Twenty patients received a stentless valve and 13 a stented valve. No patient had significant aortic regurgitation, other valvular disease or coronary artery disease. LV fractional shortening (FS) increased from 19+/-6% to 26+/-7% post-operatively and to 33+/-12% at follow-up in the stentless group (p<0.001). In the stented group, no significant change was seen in the post-operative FS, although it improved at follow-up and at this point did not differ from the stentless group. LV mass fell from 338+/-72 to 265+/-64 g post-operatively and to 170+/-77 g at follow-up (p<0.001) in the stentless group, whereas in the stented group a significant fall was seen only at follow-up (329+/-51 g pre-operatively, 304+/-68 g post-operatively, 166+/-28 g at follow-up, p=0.01). LV free wall excursion increased from 0.8+/-0.3 to 1.1+/-0.4 cm (p=0.05) and to 1.4+/-0.3 cm (p=0.02 compared with pre-operative values) in the stentless group. In the stented group, values were 1.0+/-0.4, 1.0+/-0.3 and 1.3+/-0.2 cm (p=0.05 compared with pre-operative) at the three time points, respectively. QRS duration fell from 113+/-36 ms pre-operatively to 99+/-12 ms at follow-up in the stentless group and from 117+/-28 to 99+/-19 ms in the stented group, p=0.01 for both comparisons. QT interval fell from 385+/-54 ms pre-operatively to 366+/-39 ms at follow-up (p=0.04) in the stentless group with no significant change in the stented group (387+/-52 and 375+/-33 ms, p=0.24). There was reversal of LV strain pattern in 11 (55%) of the stentless group and 6 (46%) of the stented group and normalisation of the inverted U wave in two thirds of patients.

CONCLUSION

In patients with AS and severe LV dysfunction, there is a more rapid improvement in LV function following aortic valve replacement with a stentless prosthesis. Improvements in those receiving stented valves appear delayed, although there were no differences between the groups in LV function or mass at follow-up. Normalisation of LV free wall systolic behaviour, narrowing of the QRS complex and a reduction in the QT interval suggest that AS is associated with subendocardial ischaemia that reverses following valve replacement.

Comparison of outcomes after aortic valve replacement with a mechanical valve or a bioprosthesis using microsimulation

BACKGROUND

Mechanical valves and bioprostheses are widely used for aortic valve replacement. Though previous randomised studies indicate that there is no important difference in outcome after implantation with either type of valve, knowledge of outcomes after aortic valve replacement is incomplete.

OBJECTIVE

To predict age and sex specific outcomes of patients after aortic valve replacement with bileaflet mechanical valves and stented porcine bioprostheses, and to provide evidence based support for the choice of prosthesis.

METHODS

Meta-analysis of published results of primary aortic valve replacement with bileaflet mechanical prostheses (nine reports, 4274 patients, and 25,726 patient-years) and stented porcine bioprostheses (13 reports, 9007 patients, and 54,151 patient-years) was used to estimate the annual risks of postoperative valve related events and their outcomes. These estimates were entered into a microsimulation model, which was employed to calculate age and sex specific outcomes after aortic valve replacement.

RESULTS

Life expectancy (LE) and event-free life expectancy (EFLE) for a 65 year old man after implantation with a mechanical valve or a bioprosthesis were 10.4 and 10.7 years and 7.7 and 8.4 years, respectively. The lifetime risk of at least one valve related event for a mechanical valve was 48%, and for a bioprosthesis, 44%. For LE and EFLE, the age crossover point between the two valve types was 59 and 60 years, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Meta-analysis based microsimulation provides insight into the long term outcome after aortic valve replacement and suggests that the currently recommended age threshold for implanting a bioprosthesis could be lowered further.

St. Jude Medical Toronto biologic aortic root prosthesis: Early FDA phase II IDE study results

BACKGROUND

Several biological aortic root replacement techniques have distinct advantages over mechanical composite root replacement including better valvular hemodynamic characteristics and the lack of need for anticoagulation. Current biological root replacement options lack proven long-term durability or are limited by technical or practical concerns. We report the early results from a phase II multicenter clinical trial of the porcine St. Jude Toronto Bioprosthesis with BiLinx (Toronto root).

METHODS

176 Toronto roots were implanted as total aortic root replacement from August 2001 through August 2003. Concomitant cardiac procedures including coronary artery bypass grafting (31%) and ascending aortic replacement (55%) were performed in 74%. Patients were followed clinically and were examined with an echocardiogram at discharge, 6 months, 12 months, and yearly thereafter. Root sizes implanted included 29 mm in 38%, 27 mm in 30%, 25 mm in 20%, 23 mm in 10%, and 21 mm in 2.2%.

RESULTS

There are 205 patient years of follow-up through October 2003. Operative mortality was 3.9% (none were valve related) and late mortality was 4%. Operative stroke rate was 1.1% and late stroke rate was 0.6%. Endocarditis developed in 1 patient. Freedom from aortic regurgitation is to date 100% at discharge, 6 months, and 1 year postimplant. Reoperation of the aortic valve/root was not required in any patient. Six-month mean transvalvular gradients for 21-29 mm valves were 12.8, 8.8, 5.3, 4.9, and 4.7 mm Hg, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Aortic root replacement with the Toronto root is safe and provides superb transvalvular hemodynamics with freedom from anticoagulation. The Toronto root seems widely applicable for all types of aortic root pathology and these early data offer very encouraging results. Long-term follow-up is required.

The next generation of prosthetic heart valves needs a proven track record of patient outcomes at > or =15 to 20 years

Currently, a selection of good, albeit not perfect, prosthetic heart valves (PHVs) with data on patient outcomes with follow-up times of 15 to 20 years or longer is available. The "next generation" of PHVs have some interesting features, but there are no data on patient outcomes at > or =15 to 20 years. The history of PHVs is that: 1) major advances have come in small increments, and 2) extrapolations made from early results were not correct at long term, and when this occurred, patients paid the price in terms of mortality and morbidity. Thus, great enthusiasm from early results and premature prediction may be inappropriate. The data on long-term outcomes are needed and in 2003 one should preferentially select a PHV with proven long-term results.

Choice of prosthetic heart valves:update for the next generation

Intervention for valvular heart disease poses unique clinical challenges in cardiology because the diseases are of relatively low prevalence, the interventions do not lend themselves to randomized comparative trials, and important clinical end points are assessed only after decades of follow-up. In addition, continuing advances in prosthetic heart valve technology make follow-up a moving target because long-term data by definition are available only for older prostheses. Newer tissue and mechanical prostheses afford superior hemodynamics compared with their older counterparts, and data suggest that durability and patient mortality are superior with newer compared with older bioprostheses. Arbitrary cutoffs dictating valve choice based predominantly on patient age may not give appropriate weight to individual patient perspectives. In educating and counseling patients regarding choices in heart valve prostheses, the clinician should help the patient weigh the relative merits for the individual patient of projected mortality, valve durability, and requirement for anticoagulation, with associated freedom from re-operation, hemorrhagic and thromboembolic risk, and impact on lifestyle.

Risk in elderly patients after stentless versus stented aortic valve surgery

Recent studies suggest that the hemodynamic advantage of stentless bioprostheses over the stented type improves long-term survival after aortic valve replacement, but the more complex and time-consuming implantation technique may increase the risks of operative death and postoperative complications. Between April 1996 and June 2001, 519 patients with a mean age of 76 +/- 5 years underwent aortic valve replacement using a stentless (Medtronic Freestyle, n = 277) or stented bioprosthesis (Medtronic Mosaic, n = 242). Multiple logistic regression analysis considering different patient populations revealed no increased risk of operative death, postoperative complications, or neurological impairment after implantation of a stentless bioprosthesis. Survival curves in respect of 367 patients who underwent aortic valve replacement up to September 2000 and were followed up for 3 years were not different (p = 0.98). As the patients were elderly, improved survival due to implantation of a stentless valve could not be demonstrated within this time span.

Survival after stentless and stented xenograft aortic valve replacement: a concurrent, controlled trial

BACKGROUND

To define the impact of stentless versus stented valve design on survival late after xenograft aortic valve replacement, a retrospective analysis of all consecutive patients operated on between January 1992 and April 2000 was undertaken.

METHODS

Two hundred ninety-two patients had stented (group 1) and 376 stentless (group 2) xenograft aortic valve replacements. Age was older in group 1 (75 +/- 4 vs 70 +/- 7 years, p = 0.01), whereas male gender and aortic stenosis were equally prevalent. Advanced New York Heart Association class III-IV (85% vs 78%, p = 0.03) and associated procedures (53% vs 41%, p = 0.01) were more common in group 1. Aortic cross-clamp (80 +/- 28 vs 96 +/- 23 minutes, p = 0.01) and bypass (91 +/- 56 vs 129 +/- 34 minutes, p = 0.01) times were shorter in group 1. Logistic regression and Cox proportional hazard methods were used to define the role of demographic and operative variables on hospital and late survival, freedom from valve-related mortality, and reintervention.

RESULTS

Early mortality was higher in group 1 (6.2% vs 2.6%, p = 0.02). Smaller aortic anulus (p = 0.008), aortic cross-clamp (p = 0.03), and coronary disease requiring bypass (p = 0.03) were associated with hospital mortality. During follow-up (37 +/- 30 vs 43 +/- 35 months, p = NS), 66 late deaths were recorded (12% vs 9%, p = NS). At 8 years, survival (70 +/- 5% vs 81 +/- 3%, p = 0.01), freedom from cardiac- (85 +/- 1% vs 92 +/- 3%, p = 0.02), and valve-related death (79 +/- 5% vs 95 +/- 2%, p = 0.004) were higher in group 2. Freedom from structural deterioration was similar (92 +/- 5% vs 93 +/- 3%, p = NS), but freedom from reoperation was lower in group 2 (99 +/- 1% vs 90 +/- 4%, p = 0.009). Multivariate analysis showed female gender (p = 0.02), age (p = 0.03), and smaller valve size (p = 0.05) to be associated with late mortality; age (p = 0.06) and diagnosis of aortic stenosis (p = 0.008) with cardiac mortality; longer intensive care unit stay (p = 0.001) and stented xenografts (p = 0.05) with valve-related mortality; and younger age (p = 0.01) and stentless xenograft (p = 0.05) with reoperation.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of stentless xenografts correlates with better survival and freedom from cardiac- and valve-related mortality than stented valves. However, bias favoring stented valves in older and sicker patients exists. Selective survival advantage of stentless xenograft is confined to valve-related mortality. Stentless valves are more likely to be replaced for dysfunction.