Stage I non-small cell lung cancer: a pragmatic approach to prognosis after complete resection

Influence of adjuvant chemotherapy on survival for patients with stage IB and IIA non-small cell lung cancer

Background

The role of adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) for patients with stage IB–IIA non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) according to the eighth edition of the AJCC TNM staging system remains controversial.

Methods

Data were collected from patients with NSCLC stage IB–IIA according to the eighth edition of the AJCC TNM staging system who underwent surgical resection from 2008 to 2015. The relationship between ACT and overall survival (OS) or disease‐free survival (DFS) was analyzed using the Kaplan–Meier method and Cox proportional hazards model.

Results

The study included 648 patients with completely resected NSCLC stage IB–IIA; 312 underwent ACT after surgical resection and 336 were placed under observation. After propensity score matching, 247 pairs of patients were matched and the five‐year OS was 88.08% and 83.12% (P = 0.13) in ACT and non‐ACT settings, respectively. Subgroup analyses demonstrated that ACT treatment was correlated with an improved five‐year OS in patients with visceral pleural invasion (VPI) in the 3 < tumor ≤ 4 cm subgroup (93.98% and 68.93%, P < 0.01).

Conclusions

ACT was not significantly associated with improved five‐year OS in stage IB–IIA NSCLC patients. However, further subgroup analysis showed that patients with VPI in the 3 < tumor ≤ 4 cm (T2aN0M0, stage IB) subgroup might benefit more from ACT. Further studies are required to validate the findings and better systemic strategies need to be developed in these patients.

Key points

Significant findings of the study

For patients with stage IB–IIA NSCLC according to the eighth edition of the AJCC TNM staging system, the effect of ACT remains unclear.

ACT was not significantly associated with improved five‐year OS in stage IB–IIA NSCLC patients. However, it was correlated with better DFS before or after PSM.

Patients with VPI in the 3 < tumor ≤ 4 cm subgroup may benefit from ACT.

What this study adds

ACT was not significantly associated with improved five‐year OS in stage IB–IIA NSCLC patients. However, it was correlated with better DFS before or after PSM.

Patients with VPI in the 3 < tumor ≤ 4 cm subgroup may benefit from ACT.

Eurolung risk score is associated with long-term survival after curative resection for lung cancer

Objective

The study objective was to verify whether the Eurolung score was associated with long-term prognosis after lung cancer resection.

Methods

A total of 1359 consecutive patients undergoing anatomic lung resection (1136 lobectomies, 103 pneumonectomies, 120 segmentectomies) (2014-2018) were analyzed. The parsimonious aggregate Eurolung2 score was calculated for each patient. Median follow-up was 802 days. Survival distribution was estimated by the Kaplan–Meier method. Cox proportional hazard regression and competing risk regression analyses were used to assess the independent association of Eurolung with overall and disease-specific survival.

Results

Patients were grouped into 4 classes according to their Eurolung scores (A 0-2.5, B 3-5, C 5.5-6.5, D 7-11.5). Most patients were in class A (52%) and B (33%), 8% were in class C, and 7% were in class D. Five-year overall survival decreased across the categories (A: 75%; B: 52%; C: 29%; D: 27%, log rank P < .0001). The score stratified the 3-year overall survival in patients with pT1 (P < .0001) or pT>1 (P < .0001). In addition, the different classes were associated with incremental risk of long-term overall mortality in patients with pN0 (P < .0001) and positive nodes (P = .0005). Cox proportional hazard regression and competing regression analyses showed that Eurolung aggregate score remained significantly associated with overall (hazard ratio, 1.19; P < .0001) and disease-specific survival after adjusting for pT and pN stage (hazard ratio, 1.09; P = .005).

Conclusions

Eurolung aggregate score was associated with long-term survival after curative resection for cancer. This information may be valuable to inform the shared decision-making process and the multidisciplinary team discussion assisting in the selection of the most appropriate curative treatment in high-risk patients.

Predicting postoperative non-small cell lung cancer prognosis via long short-term relational regularization

OBJECTIVES

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death worldwide. Prognosis of lung cancer plays a crucial role in the clinical decision-making process to optimize the treatment for patients. Most of the existing data-driven prognostic prediction models explore the relations between patient's characteristics and outcomes at a specific time interval. Although valuable, they neglect the relations between long-term and short-term prognoses and thus may limit the prediction performance.

METHODS

In this study, we present a novel prognostic prediction approach for postoperative NSCLC patients. Specifically, we formulate the learning objective function by exploiting the relations between long-term and short-term prognoses via a long short-term relational regularization. The regularization term is composed of two parts, i.e., the similarities between prognoses measured by patients' outcomes and the L₂ -norms between the corresponding prognoses' weight vectors. Based on this regularization, the proposed method can extract critical risk factors that comprehensively consider the long-term and short-term prognoses to facilitate the estimation of clinical risks.

RESULTS

We evaluate the proposed model on a clinical dataset containing 693 consecutive postoperative NSCLC patients with more than 5-year follow-up from 2006 to 2015. Our best models achieve 0.743, 0.709, and 0.746 AUCs for 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year survival prediction, 0.696, 0.724, and 0.736 AUCs for 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year recurrence prediction, respectively. The experimental results show the efficiency of our proposed model in improving the performances on 1-year prognostic prediction in comparison with benchmark models. By comparing with the model without the long short-term relational regularization, the proposed model extracts more consistent critical risk factors for both long-term and short-term prognoses and contains fewer unreasonable risk factors under the clinician's review.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that the proposed model can effectively exploit the relations between long-term and short-term prognoses. And the risk factors recognized by the proposed model have the potentials for further prognostic prediction of postoperative non-small cell lung cancer patients.

Overall Survival Following Thoracoscopic vs Open Lobectomy for Early-stage Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: A Meta-analysis

A majority of observational studies on overall survival following thoracoscopic vs open lobectomy for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer did not demonstrate a significant difference, whereas several meta-analyses on this topic showed a significant difference. The PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were queried for studies published in the English language. We searched for meta-analyses and original studies comparing overall survival between thoracoscopic and open lobectomy for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer. Our meta-analysis, using random effect models and with a hazard ratio as a measure of effect, was performed on original studies. Publication bias was evaluated with funnel plots of precision and the Egger test. Seven meta-analyses on this topic were found and all of them have shown that thoracoscopic lobectomy is associated with significantly more favorable overall survival than open lobectomy, using odds ratio, risk ratio, or risk difference as measures of effect. Our meta-analysis of 11 observational studies demonstrated no significant difference in overall survival between thoracoscopic (n = 2386) and open lobectomy (n = 3494) for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (pooled hazard ratio: 0.91, 95% confidence interval: 0.76-1.09, P = 0.30). Neither funnel plots of precision nor the Egger test suggested a publication bias. Our meta-analysis, using a hazard ratio as a measure of effect for a time-to-event outcome, did not demonstrate a significant difference in overall survival between thoracoscopic and open lobectomy with the current dataset available in the literature, as opposed to previous meta-analyses.

Meta-analysis of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy without radiotherapy in early stage non-small cell lung cancer

Background

Many clinical trials have confirmed that postoperative adjuvant therapy can prolong survival of non-small cell lung cancer. However, the efficiency of postoperative chemotherapy without radiotherapy is unclear, especially in early stage (stages I and II). We aimed to assess the effect of postoperative chemotherapy without radiotherapy in early stage patients.

Methods

Databases and manual searches were adopted to identify eligible randomized control trials. Hazard ratio (HR) was used to assess the advantage of disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) by fixed or random-effects models.

Results

Fourteen trials with 3,923 patients were included based on inclusion criteria. Compared with surgery alone, postoperative chemotherapy significantly improved DFS and OS with HR of 0.71 (P=0.005) and 0.74 (P<0.00001), respectively. Subgroup analysis showed both cisplatin-based (HR: 0.75, P<0.0001) and single tegafur–uracil (UFT) chemotherapy (HR: 0.72, P=0.002) yielded significant survival benefits, but the latter did not improve DFS (HR: 1.04, P=0.81). Indirect treatment comparison showed cisplatin-based chemotherapy was superior to single UFT in DFS, but comparable in OS. The benefits of postoperative chemotherapy were maintained in patients in stage I (HR: 0.74, P<0.00001) and IB (HR: 0.74, P=0.0003), but not in stage IA, although the trend supported chemotherapy (HR: 0.76, P=0.43).

Conclusion

This meta-analysis demonstrates that postoperative chemotherapy without radiotherapy improves survival of stage I–II, I, and IB non-small cell lung cancer patients, but not for IA. Meanwhile, efficacy of cisplatin-based chemotherapy is comparable to single UFT in OS, but better in DFS, which should be paid more attention in future clinical practice.

Comparative effectiveness issues in lung cancer

Lung cancer accounts for more cancer deaths than breast, prostate, colorectal and pancreatic cancer combined. With an aging population, greater intensity of cancer care, and the need for care of the growing number of cancer survivors, comparative effectiveness research opportunities will continue to emerge for this disease. In this chapter, we focus on CER opportunities in lung cancer surgery from the vantage point of those factors directly influenced by the surgeon, patient and the healthcare system.

Survival in the elderly after pneumonectomy for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer: a comparison with nonoperative management

BACKGROUND

Short-term outcomes of morbidity, mortality, and quality of life after pneumonectomy worsen with increasing age. The impact of age on long-term outcomes has not been well described. The purpose of this study was to quantify the impact of patient age on long-term survival after pneumonectomy for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer.

STUDY DESIGN

Overall survival (OS) of patients who had a pneumonectomy for stage I to II non-small cell lung cancer in the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results program registry from 1988 through 2010 was evaluated using multivariable and propensity score adjusted Cox proportional hazard models. Age was stratified as younger than 50 years, 50 to 69 years, 70 to 79 years, and 80 years and older. Pneumonectomy patients' OS was compared with matched patients who refused surgery and underwent radiation therapy (RT).

RESULTS

Pneumonectomies comprised 10.8% of non-small cell lung cancer resections in 1988, but only 2.9% in 2010. Overall, 5-year OS of 5,701 pneumonectomy patients was 49.8% (95% CI, 45.3-54.8%) for patients younger than 50 years, 40.5% (95% CI, 38.8-42.2%) for patients 50 to 69 years, 28.9% (95% CI, 26.6-31.5%) for patients 70 to 79 years, and 18.8% (95% CI, 14.2-24.8%) for patients 80 and older (p < 0.001). Increasing patient age was the most important predictor of worse OS (hazard ratio = 1.34 per decade; p < 0.001). For patients younger than 70 years, 5-year OS was 46.3% (95% CI, 36.2-59.2%) after pneumonectomy vs 18.4% (95% CI, 11.9-28.3%) for matched RT patients (p < 0.001). In matched groups of patients 70 years and older, 5-year OS for pneumonectomy was 25.8% (95% CI, 20.8-32.0%) vs 12.2% for RT (95% CI, 8.6-17.4%; p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Survival after pneumonectomy for stage I to II non-small cell lung cancer decreases steadily with patient age. The incremental benefit of pneumonectomy vs RT in matched patients is less in patients older than 70 years than in younger patients, although outcomes with pneumonectomy are superior to RT in all age groups. Patients should not be denied pneumonectomy based on age alone, but careful patient selection in elderly patients is essential to optimize survival.

A review of 250 ten-year survivors after pneumonectomy for non-small-cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVES

During the last decades, pneumonectomy has been increasingly seen as a risky procedure, first reserved for tumours not amenable to lobectomy, and now discouraged even in advanced stages of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Our purpose was to assess the long-term survival following pneumonectomy for NSCLC and its prognostic factors.

METHODS

We set a retrospective study including every patient who underwent a pneumonectomy for NSCLC in 2 French centres from 1981 to 2002. We then described the demographic and pathological characteristics of patients who survived >10 years, and studied the prognostic factors of long-term survival.

RESULTS

During the study period, 1466 pneumonectomies were performed for NSCLC, including 1121 standard and 345 extended, and accounted for the overall population. Postoperative complications occurred in 396 patients (27%), including 93 deaths (6.3%). Five- and 10-year survival rates were 32 and 19%, respectively. Two-hundred and fifty patients survived >10 years after surgery, and accounted for the study group. The study group included a majority of males (n = 230, 92%), a mean age of 57 ± 9.2 years and a majority of clinical stage IIIA (n = 117, 46.8%). Induction, right-sided pneumonectomy, extended resection and adjuvant therapy were performed in 41 (16.4%), 109 (43.6%), 40 (16%) and 97 patients (38.8%), respectively. Histology revealed a majority of squamous cell carcinoma (n = 181, 72.4%), T2 tumours (n = 117, 36.8%) and N1 disease (n = 105, 42%). In multivariate analysis, factors associated with adverse outcomes included older age, advanced stage, extended resection, non-lethal postoperative complication, adenocarcinoma, lymphatic vessel microinvasion, N1 and N2 disease and R1 and R2 resection.

CONCLUSIONS

During the last 30 years, pneumonectomy was effectively performed for advanced NSCLC, allowing a 10-year survival rate of 19%. Such results have not been reported with other non-surgical treatments and confirm that pneumonectomy is still an essential weapon in the armamentarium against lung cancer.

Clinical significance and role of lymphatic vessel invasion as a major prognostic implication in non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis

Background

Lymphatic vessel invasion (LVI) exerts an important process in the progression and local spread of cancer cells. However, LVI as a prognostic factor for survival in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains controversial.

Methodology/Principal Findings

A meta-analysis of published studies from PubMed and EMBASE electronic databases was performed to quantity the effects of LVI on both relapse-free survival and overall survival for patients with NSCLC. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were used to assess the strength of these effects. This meta-analysis included 18,442 NSCLC patients from 53 eligible studies. LVI appeared in 32.1% (median; range, 2.8% to 70.9%) of tumor samples. In all, patients with LVI were 2.48 times more likely to relapse by univariate analysis (95% CI: 1.92–3.22) and 1.73 times by multivariate analysis (95% CI: 1.24–2.41) compared with those without LVI. For the analyses of LVI and overall survival, the pooled HR estimate was 1.97 (95% CI: 1.75–2.21) by univariate analysis and 1.59 (95% CI: 1.41–1.79) by multivariate analysis. Multivariate analysis showed a risk was 91% higher for recurrence (HR  = 1.91, 95% CI: 1.14–2.91) and 70% higher for mortality (HR = 1.70, 95% CI: 1.38–2.10) in LVI-positive I stage patients compared with LVI-negative I stage patients. Subgroup analyses showed similar significant adjusted risks for recurrence and death in adenocarcinomas, and a significant adjusted risk for death in studies that utilized elastic staining with or without immunohistochemistry in defining LVI.

Conclusions/Significance

The present study indicates that LVI appears to be an independent poor prognosticator in surgically managed NSCLC. NSCLC patients with LVI would require a more aggressive treatment strategy after surgery. However, large, well-designed prospective studies with clinically relevant modeling and standard methodology to assess LVI are required to address some of these important issues.

Blood vessel invasion as a strong independent prognostic indicator in non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background and Objective

Blood vessel invasion plays a very important role in the progression and metastasis of cancer. However, blood vessel invasion as a prognostic factor for survival in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains controversial. The aim of this study is to explore the relationship between blood vessel invasion and outcome in patients with NSCLC using meta-analysis.

Methods

A meta-analysis of published studies was conducted to investigate the effects of blood vessel invasion on both relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) for patients with NSCLC. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were used to assess the strength of this association.

Results

A total of 16,535 patients from 52 eligible studies were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis. In total, blood vessel invasion was detected in 29.8% (median; range from 6.2% to 77.0%) of patients with NSCLC. The univariate and multivariate estimates for RFS were 3.28 (95% CI: 2.14–5.05; P<0.0001) and 3.98 (95% CI: 2.24–7.06; P<0.0001), respectively. For the analyses of blood vessel invasion and OS, the pooled HR estimate was 2.22 (95% CI: 1.93–2.56; P<0.0001) by univariate analysis and 1.90 (95% CI: 1.65–2.19; P<0.0001) by multivariate analysis. Furthermore, in stage I NSCLC patients, the meta-risk for recurrence (HR = 6.93, 95% CI: 4.23–11.37, P<0.0001) and death (HR = 2.15, 95% CI: 1.68–2.75; P<0.0001) remained highly significant by multivariate analysis.

Conclusions

This study shows that blood vessel invasion appears to be an independent negative prognosticator in surgically managed NSCLC. However, adequately designed large prospective studies and investigations are warranted to confirm the present findings.

Female gender is an independent prognostic factor in non-small-cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis

PURPOSE

It is not clear whether women with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) live significantly longer than men. Thus, we conducted a meta-analysis of published studies to quantitatively compare NSCLC survival data between genders.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A MEDLINE Web search for computer-archived bibliographic data regarding overall survival differences between genders was performed. DerSimonian-Laird random effects analysis was used to estimate the pooled hazard ratio (HR).

RESULTS

We selected 39 articles as appropriate data sources, involving 86 800 patients including 32 701 women and 54 099 men. Combined HRs for women vs. men in studies using univariate and multivariate analyses respectively were 0.79 (p <0.0001) and 0.78 (p <0.0001). Pooled HRs for 3 study subgroups having (1) fewer than 30% stage I cases, (2) fewer than 50% adenocarcinoma cases, and (3) statistical adjustment for smoking status all indicated the survival advantage of women.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis of published data concerning NSCLC patients indicated significantly better survival for women.

How close are we to customizing chemotherapy in early non-small cell lung cancer?

Although surgery is the only potentially curative treatment for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), 5-year survival rates range from 77% for stage IA tumors to 23% in stage IIIA disease. Adjuvant chemotherapy has recently been established as a standard of care for resected stage II-III NSCLC, on the basis of large-scale clinical trials employing third-generation platinum-based regimens. As the overall absolute 5-year survival benefit from this approach does not exceed 5% and potential long-term complications are an issue of concern, the aim of customized adjuvant systemic treatment is to optimize the toxicity/benefit ratio, so that low-risk individuals are spared from unnecessary intervention, while avoiding undertreatment of high-risk patients, including those with stage I disease. Therefore, the application of reliable prognostic and predictive biomarkers would enable to identify appropriate patients for the most effective treatment.This is an overview of the data available on the most promising clinicopathological and molecular biomarkers that could affect adjuvant and neoadjuvant chemotherapy decisions for operable NSCLC in routine practice. Among the numerous candidate molecular biomarkers, only few gene-expression profiling signatures provide clinically relevant information warranting further validation. On the other hand, real-time quantitative polymerase-chain reaction strategy involving relatively small number of genes offers a practical alternative, with high cross-platform performance. Although data extrapolation from the metastatic setting should be cautious, the concept of personalized, pharmacogenomics-guided chemotherapy for early NSCLC seems feasible, and is currently being evaluated in randomized phase 2 and 3 trials. The mRNA and/or protein expression levels of excision repair cross-complementation group 1, ribonucleotide reductase M1 and breast cancer susceptibility gene 1 are among the most potential biomarkers for early disease, with stage-independent prognostic and predictive values, the clinical utility of which is being validated prospectively. Inter-assay discordance in determining the biomarker status and association with clinical outcomes is noteworthing.

Thyroid transcription factor 1 is an independent prognostic factor for patients with stage I lung adenocarcinoma

PURPOSE

Thyroid transcription factor 1 (TTF1) is a transcription factor that regulates the expression of multiple genes involved in lung development. It is preferentially expressed in adenocarcinomas of the lung and has been investigated as a potential prognostic parameter in patients with lung cancer, with conflicting results. We quantitatively assessed TTF1 protein expression in two large and independent data sets to investigate the impact of TTF1 nuclear expression on patient survival.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Automated quantitative analysis, a fluorescent-based method for analysis of in situ protein expression, was used to assess a series of cell lines to find the threshold of detection of TTF1 expression. Then two independent cohorts (176 and 237 cases, respectively) were measured by the same technique, and TTF1 expression was correlated with survival.

RESULTS

Tumors expressed TTF1 in 45% and 58% of the cases in each cohort. TTF1 was consistently expressed in adenocarcinomas (n = 61 and 73; Spearman rho = 0.313 and 0.4 for the first and second set, respectively; P < .0001) independent of their differentiation and stage. Survival analysis showed that patients with stage I adenocarcinoma with TTF1 expression had a longer median overall survival than those without expression (n = 43, 44.3 v 26.2 months, P = .05 for the first cohort; n = 87; 49.7 v 38.5 months, P = .03 for the second cohort) Multivariate analysis revealed an independent lower risk of death for patients with stage I adenocarcinoma with TTF1-expressing tumors (hazard ratio = 0.479, 95% CI, 0.235 to 0.977; P = .043).

CONCLUSION

TTF1 expression defines a subgroup of patients with a favorable outcome and may be useful for prognostic stratification of patients with stage I lung adenocarcinoma.

Global histone modifications predict prognosis of resected non small-cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

Epigenetic modifications may contribute to the development and progression of cancer. We investigated whether epigenetic changes involving multiple histones influence prognosis of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We used immunohistochemistry to assess histone 3 lysine 4 dimethylation (H3K4diMe), and acetylation of histone 2A lysine 5 (H2AK5Ac), histone 2B lysine 12, histone 3 lysine 9 (H3K9Ac), and histone 4 lysine 8 in resected tumor samples of 138 NSCLC patients. Data were analyzed using a recursive partitioning analysis (RPA).

RESULTS

The RPA classified the patients into seven distinct prognostic groups based on TNM stage (first node), histology, and histone modifications: H3K4diMe (< or 85% tumor cells), H3K9Ac (< or 68% tumor cells), and H2AK5Ac (< or 5% tumor cells). The seven groups were associated with significantly different disease-free (P < .0001) and overall survival (P < .0001). Interestingly, the four groups determined by stage I patients (below the first node) displayed dramatic differences in survival (median, 10 months in adenocarcinoma patients with H3K9Ac 68% v 147 months in nonadenocarcinoma patients with H3K4diMe 85%). A Cox model retained age and RPA groups as the sole independent factors significantly influencing overall survival.

CONCLUSION

The prognostic influence of epigenetic changes involving multiple histones, in particular H2A and H3, is greater in early NSCLC, and evaluation of these changes may help in selecting early-stage NSCLC patients for adjuvant treatment. Our observations provide a rationale for the use of a combination of standard chemotherapy with drugs interacting with histone modifications, such as histone deacetylase inhibitors.

The side of pneumonectomy influences long-term survival in stage I and II non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

The impact of pneumonectomy as an independent factor on long-term survival after lung resection for centrally or locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains controversial. The aim of this paper is to study the impact of pneumonectomy, and the influence of side of surgery, on long-term survival in patients with pathologic stage I and II NSCLC.

METHODS

A retrospective review of a prospective multi-institutional database of patients operated on for lung cancer was undertaken. In all, 1,475 patients with pathologic stage I or II NSCLC were studied (421 underwent pneumonectomy; 1,054 had a lobectomy/bilobectomy). Survival and impact of side of surgery for pneumonectomy and lesser resection groups were analyzed and compared using the Kaplan-Meier method and the Cox proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

Median survival was worse after pneumonectomy than after less extensive resections for patients overall (33 versus 57 months) and for those with stage I NSCLC (38 versus 70 months); however, median survival was better after pneumonectomy for stage II left tumors (55 versus 19 months). Pneumonectomy was an independent adverse determinant of survival for both stage I right tumors (p < 0.001) and stage I left tumors (p < 0.001), but was associated with improved survival for stage II left tumors (p = 0.009).

CONCLUSIONS

Pneumonectomy was found to be an independent determinant of survival in patients with stage I and II NSCLC, but results differed for right- and left-sided tumors. Further studies of survival comparing pneumonectomy with lesser resections should differentiate between right and left procedures.

Open lobectomy for patients with stage I non-small cell lung cancer

Until additional multi-institutional, randomized, controlled trials provide evidence to the contrary, open lobectomy with mediastinal lymphadenectomy should be considered the gold standard for treating patients with stage I NSCLC with sufficient cardiopulmonary reserve, including older patients. It is the operation with which alternative pulmonary resections, including video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy and sublobar resection, should be compared. In treating stage I NSCLC patients, sublobar resection should be reserved for patients with inadequate physiologic reserve to tolerate lobectomy and for those enrolled in clinical trials.

Synchronous multiple primary lung cancer: An increasing clinical occurrence requiring multidisciplinary management

OBJECTIVE

No guidelines detailing recommendations for the selection and treatment of patients with synchronous multiple primary lung cancer have been published. We report on a single-institution experience with synchronous multiple primary lung cancer, with emphasis on long-term survival.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective study of 125 consecutive patients with synchronous multiple primary lung cancer who underwent operation between 1985 and 2006. Various treatment strategies were applied, including perioperative therapy. Potential prognosticators were submitted to univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

Tumors were bilateral (n = 34) or ipsilateral (n = 91). Optimal surgical treatment (complete anatomic resection with radical lymphadenectomy) was possible in 65.6% of the cases. pN0 disease was present in 32.3% of the patients; 30-day and 90-day mortality rates were 4.5% and 11%, respectively. Two- and 5-year overall survivals were 61.6% and 34%, respectively, with a median survival of 35 months. On univariate analysis, smoking status, high Charlson index, low forced expiratory volume in 1 second, occurrence of postoperative complications, and performance of a pneumonectomy affected the overall survival adversely. Conversely, bilateral disease, location in the same lobe, and pN0 disease were favorable prognosticators. On multivariate analysis, low forced expiratory volume in 1 second, nonoptimal surgical treatment, and performance of a pneumonectomy were independent predictors of poor long-term survival, whereas female sex, younger age, asymptomatic disease, pN0 status, and performance of an adjuvant treatment affected the survival favorably.

CONCLUSIONS

Provided there is an appropriate selection process, patients with synchronous multiple primary lung cancer are expected to benefit from surgery. Optimal surgery should be performed, but pneumonectomy should be avoided whenever possible. Adjuvant treatment is suggested to provide an added survival advantage.

Essai randomisé de phase III de chimiothérapie adjuvante par CDDP/docetaxel versus CDDP/gemcitabine dans les cancers bronchiques non à petites cellules réséqués avec la qualité de vie comme objectif principal

BACKGROUND

Adjuvant chemotherapy improves survival of completely resected non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However the regimen of choice is not yet defined.

METHODS

The primary objective of this comparative, open, randomised multicentre trial is to compare two chemotherapy regimens (cisplatin/docetaxel versus cisplatin/gemcitabine) in the management of resected NSCLC with quality of life (QoL) evaluated at the end of treatment as the primary objective. The secondary objectives are to study the impact of these two chemotherapy regimens on overall and relapse free survival, hematological and non-hematological toxicities, and costs. The primary judgement criterion will be the assessment of end of treatment QoL by the standardised questionnaire, EORTC QLQ-C30. Secondary judgement criteria will be Qol measured by EORTC QLQ-LC13 and SF36, overall and relapse free survival, tolerance and costs. The number of subjects needed is 75 in each group, 150 in total, to detect a difference of 10 points on the EORTC QLC-C30 scores with a standard error of 20 points (alpha 0.05; power 80%).

EXPECTED RESULTS

This trial will provide clinicians with data on the impact of two currently unexplored adjuvant chemotherapy regimens on quality of life, tolerance and costs in NSCLC.

Prognostic impact of Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) image analysis cytometry and immunohistochemical expression of Ki67 in surgically resected non-small cell lung cancers

BACKGROUND

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the prognostic significance of DNA ploidy and Ki67 expression in non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC).

METHODS

This prospective study included 96 patients with stages I-IIIA NSCLC who underwent surgical excision. DNA image analysis cytometry was applied on imprints. Calculation of the DNA index (DI) and the 5c exceeding rate (5cER) was performed and the histograms were classified as peridiploid, peritetraploid, and x-ploid-multiploid. The Ki67 immunoreactivity was determined according to the avidin-biotin complex immunoperoxidase method.

RESULTS

DNA histogram classification disclosed 30 peridiploid cases, 15 peritetraploid and 51 x-ploid-multiploid. Forty-eight cases (50%) had 5cER > 5%. The Ki67 immunoreactivity was below 25% in 53 tumors (62.4%) and above 25% in 32 (32.6%). Our results revealed the existence of a statistically significant relationship of DNA ploidy with nodal status (p = 0.042) and grade (p = 0.005). Adenocarcinomas and large cell carcinomas were more frequently encountered in x-ploid-multiploid tumors as compared to squamous cell carcinomas, which were more frequently peridiploid (p = 0.003). 5cER showed statistically significant association with nodal status (p = 0.037). Univariate analysis with respect to survival revealed significant association with stage (p < 0.001), nodal status (p < 0.001), tumor status (p < 0.001), DNA ploidy (p = 0.008) and 5cER (p = 0.0124). Multivariate analysis revealed stage and ploidy status as independent factors: peridiploid tumors were associated with better survival as compared to x-ploid-multiploid tumors (p = 0.022).

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that DNA ploidy, as determined by image analysis, provides an independent prognostic parameter for patients with NSCLC and thus, could be used to identify a subset of patients with more aggressive tumors.

Surgery for early stage non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Surgical resection (usually lobectomy) is considered the treatment of choice for individuals with stage I and II non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and for some patients with resectable stage IIIA NSCLC. However much of the evidence supporting surgery is observational.

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether, in patients with early stage non-small cell lung cancer, surgical resection of cancer improves disease-specific and all-cause mortality compared with no treatment, radiotherapy or chemotherapy. To compare the effectiveness of different surgical approaches (e.g. lobectomy versus limited resection) in improving disease-specific or all-cause mortality in patients with early stage lung cancer.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Electronic databases (the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE and EMBASE (1966 to December 2003)), bibliographies, handsearching of a journal and discussion with experts were used to identify published and unpublished trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials comparing surgery alone (or in combination with other therapy) with non-surgical therapy and randomised trials comparing different surgical approaches.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

A pooled hazard ratio was calculated where possible. Tests for statistical heterogeneity were performed.

MAIN RESULTS

Eleven trials were included with a total of 1910 subjects. There were no studies with an untreated control group. In a pooled analysis of three trials, four-year survival was superior in patients with resectable stage I to IIIA NSCLC who underwent resection and complete mediastinal lymph node dissection compared with those undergoing resection and lymph node sampling, the hazard ratio was estimated to be 0.78 (95% CI 0.65-0.93, P = 0.005). A further trial found an increased rate of local recurrence in patients with stage I NSCLC treated with limited resection compared with lobectomy. One small trial found a survival advantage in favour of chemotherapy followed by surgery compared to chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy in patients with stage IIIA NSCLC. However none of the other trials included in the review demonstrated a significant improvement in survival in patients treated with surgery compared with non surgical therapy. Several of the included trials had potential methodological weaknesses.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Conclusions about the efficacy of surgery for local and loco-regional NSCLC are limited by the small number of participants studied to date and potential methodological weaknesses of trials. Current evidence suggests that lung cancer resection combined with complete mediastinal lymph node dissection is associated with a small to modest improvement in survival compared with lung cancer resection combined with systematic sampling of mediastinal nodes in patients with stage I to IIIA NSCLC.

Visceral pleural invasion in lung cancer: recognizing histologic parameters that impact staging and prognosis

Visceral pleural involvement (VPI) is a critical component in the staging of non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). Tumors < or =3 cm that involve the visceral pleura are classified as T2 lesions, underscoring the prognostic significance of this histologic parameter. Accurate staging of small NSCLCs depends on appropriately assessing the presence or absence of VPI. Elastic stains can be instrumental in detecting disruptions of the visceral pleural elastic layer by tumor, a finding that has prognostic and staging implications similar to tumor that is present on the visceral pleural surface.

[Prognostic indicators in stage I non-small cell lung cancer]

INTRODUCTION

Determinating the prognosis of patients with stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a challenge. Since up to 30% of patients who have undergone surgical resection experience recurrence, generally in distant organs, it is reasonable to postulate that neo-adjuvant or adjuvant treatments might be useful. Better knowledge of prognostic factors could perhaps define which patient populations should be targeted with such treatments.

STATE OF THE ART

Numerous potential prognostic factors, relating to the disease (TNM classification, histology, tumor size, blood vessels invasion, micro-metastasis, serum or molecular markers), the patient (gender, age, co-morbidity) as well as the treatment (delay, resection, lymph node dissection, neo-adjuvant and adjuvant treatments), are discussed.

PERSPECTIVES

These prognostic factors should be integrated into the design of future clinical trials of chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy attempting to evaluate the effectiveness of various combinations of neo-adjuvant or adjuvant therapies.

CONCLUSIONS

These factors may offer the opportunity to clinically and biologically characterize the different subgroups of patients, leading to a more rational, and perhaps individualized, choice of therapy.

Gender differences in non–small-cell lung cancer survival: an analysis of 4,618 patients diagnosed between 1997 and 2002

BACKGROUND

Gender has been reported as a predictor for nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) survival. Most of the reports are limited to selected groups of patients. The magnitude of gender effect on NSCLC survival across disease stage, tumor histology, and therapies needs to be further characterized.

METHODS

A cohort of 4,618 patients diagnosed with NSCLC was prospectively enrolled and actively followed. Vital status of each patient was verified through multiple complementary sources. Cox proportional hazards models were developed to compare postdiagnosis survival between genders adjusting for age at diagnosis, tumor histology and grade, stage, pack-years smoked, and treatment received (resection, radiation, or chemotherapy).

RESULTS

There were 2,724 men (59%) and 1,894 women (41%), with a median age at diagnosis of 68 years in men and 66 in women (p < 0.01). More men smoked and were heavier smokers than women. Adenocarcinoma was the most frequent histology in both genders. No difference was found in stage and treatment between genders. The estimated survival in men was 51% (95% CI: 49%, 53%) and 15% (95% CI: 12%, 17%) at one and five years, respectively, and in women was 60% (95% CI: 58%, 62%) and 19% (95% CI: 16%, 22%). Men were at a significantly increased risk of mortality compared to women following a diagnosis of NSCLC (adjusted relative risk: 1.20, 95% CI: 1.11, 1.30), particularly for patients with stage III/IV disease or adenocarcinoma.

CONCLUSIONS

Male gender is confirmed to be an independent unfavorable prognostic indicator for NSCLC survival.

Large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the lung: an aggressive disease potentially treatable with surgery

BACKGROUND

Assessment of clinical and pathologic features of large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma to confirm its specificity in the setting of high grade neuroendocrine pulmonary tumors.

METHODS

From 1989 to 2001, 123 patients with a neuroendocrine carcinoma were surgically treated in a curative intent at a single institution. According to the 1999 World Health Organization classification, 20 patients were reviewed as having a large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma. Clinical data as well as detailed pathologic analysis and survival were collected.

RESULTS

There were 18 men and 2 women. The median age was 62 years. Four patients had a preoperative diagnosis of large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma. The resections consisted of 14 lobectomies and 6 pneumonectomies. There was no operative death. Complications occurred in 7 patients (35%). Four patients had a stage I of the disease, 4 had stage II, 9 had stage III, and 3 had stage IV. At follow-up (median, 46 months), 13 patients died from general recurrence and 7 patients were still alive. Median time to progression was 9 months (range, 1 to 54 months). The 5-year survival rate was 36% (median, 49 months) and it seemed to be negatively influenced by the disease stage (54% for stage I-II vs 25% for stage III-IV; p = 0.07), the presence of metastatic lymph node (45% for N0/N1 vs 17% for N2; p = 0.12), or vessel invasion (66 vs 25%; p = 0.18).

CONCLUSIONS

Large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma predominantly occurred in men. An accurate tissue diagnosis was rarely obtained preoperatively. Although overall survival after resection was substantial, large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma frequently showed pathologic features of occult metastatic disease, such as lymph node or vessel invasion, or both.

Histological determinants of survival in completely resected T1-2N1M0 nonsmall cell cancer of the lung

BACKGROUND

The histologic determinants of survival after surgical resection of stage II nonsmall cell lung cancer are poorly understood. We analyzed the prognostic significance of a number of histologic features after complete resection of T1-2N1M0 nonsmall cell cancer of the lung.

METHODS

The case notes and histology of all patients who underwent a potentially curative surgical resection for T1-2N1M0 nonsmall cell carcinoma of the lung between 1991 and 1997 were reviewed retrospectively. The following histologic factors were recorded: histologic type of tumor; number of nodes with metastatic deposits together with their nodal station; the presence of vascular invasion, visceral pleural involvement, and cellular necrosis; and grade of tumor. The results from 98 patients were analyzed. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify prognostic factors.

RESULTS

Univariate analysis showed that only three factors had a statistically significant correlation with a poor prognosis: vascular invasion (p = 0.002), nonsquamous histology (p = 0.005), and visceral pleural involvement (p = 0.002). Multivariate analysis revealed that all three factors were significant independent adverse prognostic indicators.

CONCLUSIONS

Visceral pleural involvement, nonsquamous histology, and vascular invasion are all significant adverse prognostic factors after surgical resection of T1-2N1M0 nonsmall cell cancer of the lung. These findings conflict with previously published reports, and we advocate a prospective, large-scale study in order to clarify the prognostic significance of histologic characteristics in stage II disease.

Nonanatomic prognostic factors in resected nonsmall cell lung carcinoma: the importance of perineural invasion as a new prognostic marker

BACKGROUND

A number of prognostic factors have been reported for resected nonsmall cell lung carcinoma. Although none of them reported to have greater prognostic impact than the TNM staging system, which is based on anatomical descriptions of tumors, the prognoses of a significant number of patients are not in agreement with real survival of the patients. Moreover, certain histopathologic properties of the tumor (such as lymphatic and vascular invasion) could help to predict the survival of the patients.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted on 82 surgically resected nonsmall cell lung carcinomas, and the following prognostic factors were evaluated in univariate analysis: age, gender, clinical and surgical-pathologic T and N status, histologic type of tumor, grade of differentiation, lymphatic invasion, vascular invasion, and perineural invasion.

RESULTS

Lymphatic invasion and perineural invasion of the tumor were found to be significant prognostic factors (p = 0.02 and p = 0004). Blood vessel invasion (venous or arterial involvement) had no prognostic impact (p > 0.05). According to multivariate analyses, three factors were selected as prognostic indicators: (1) clinical N status (p = 0.027), (2) lymphatic invasion (p = 0.027) and (3) perineural invasion (p = 0.0148). By combining these factors we identified a poor prognostic subgroup of patients with stage I disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study showed that lymphatic vessel and perineural invasion of the tumor could be prognostic factors, along with anatomical determinants such as cN and surgical-pathologic stage of the pulmonary carcinoma.

Pneumonectomy for stage i (T1N0 and T2N0) nonsmall cell lung cancer has potent, adverse impact on survival

BACKGROUND

Surgically treated, stage I (T1N0 and T2N0) nonsmall cell lung cancer has a relatively favorable prognosis. Our aim was to determine whether performing a pneumonectomy in this group of patients has an impact on survival.

METHODS

Four hundred eighty-five patients with stage I nonsmall cell lung cancer undergoing lung resection between 1991 and 2000 were studied. Three hundred seventy-four patients underwent a smaller resection than a pneumonectomy and 111 had a pneumonectomy.

RESULTS

Patients undergoing less extensive resections were older (mean age, 65 vs 63 years) (p = 0.01); these patients were also more likely to have a history of chronic obstructive airway disease (9% vs 2%) (p = 0.01) or asthma (10% vs 3%) (p = 0.04), nonsquamous cell type (56% vs 27%) (p < 0.0001), and T1 tumor stage (66% vs 17%) (p = 0.002) than patients having a pneumonectomy. Operative mortality was 2.4% versus 8% (p = 0.01). Overall 1-, 3-, and 5-year Kaplan-Meier survival rates (95% confidence interval [CI]) after less extensive resections were 85% (CI, 82% to 90%), 63% (CI, 56% to 69%), and 50% (CI, 42% to 57%), respectively, and after pneumonectomy the survival rates were 66% (CI, 53% to 73%), 47% (CI, 35% to 57%), and 44% (CI, 32% to 55%), respectively (p = 0.0006). When the Cox proportional hazards model was applied to all study patients (n = 485), pneumonectomy (p = 0.001), T2 stage (p = 0.006), older age (p = 0.03), and male gender (p = 0.03) were independent adverse predictors of survival. When the analysis was limited to the patients having T1N0 disease (n = 145), pneumonectomy (p = 0.0008), older age (p = 0.05), and nonsquamous cell type (p = 0.02) were independent adverse determinants of survival. When only the patients with T2N0 disease were analyzed (n = 340), male gender (p = 0.0005) and pneumonectomy (p = 0.01) were independent negative predictors of survival.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, the patients who underwent pneumonectomy for stage T1N0 or T2N0 nonsmall cell lung cancer had a significantly poorer survival than those patients who underwent smaller lung resections.

Survival in primary lung cancer potentially cured by operation: influence of tumor stage and clinical characteristics

BACKGROUND

Surgical resection is currently standard treatment in early stage lung cancer. The aim of the present study was to identify stage-related factors and patient characteristics influencing survival after complete resection.

METHODS

We identified 395 patients with non-small cell lung cancer who had undergone potentially radical operation during 1987 to 1999 at one thoracic surgery institution in central Sweden. Factors independently related to survival were identified in a multivariate analysis. Survival was analyzed in low-, medium-, and high-risk groups based on a risk score calculated from relative hazards for identified risk factors.

RESULTS

Overall 5-year survival among the 395 patients was 51%. The strongest factor predicting prognosis was positive lymph nodes at operation. Higher age, earlier period for operation, impaired lung function, current smoking, and major operative complication were all related to poorer prognosis. Patients with tumor stage Ia had a 5-year survival of 69%, compared to 73% in patients in the low-risk group.

CONCLUSIONS

Tumor stage is the best prognostic indicator after radical operation. Inclusion of other tumor- and patient-related variables did not add prognostic information of clinical relevance beyond that provided by tumor stage alone.