Is the kaolin or celite activated clotting time affected by tranexamic acid?

A Pilot Study to Assess the Clinical Onset of IV Heparin in Interventional Cardiology and Cardiac Surgery

OBJECTIVES

To determine the onset of heparin anticoagulation, using 2 different measures of activated clotting times (ACT), thromboelastography (TEG; R-time), and anti-Xa levels, after administering low- (100 U/kg) and high- (300 U/kg) dose intravenous (IV) heparin to patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and cardiac surgery, respectively.

DESIGN

Prospective study.

SETTING

Single academic institution.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients with normal baseline coagulation presenting for TAVR or cardiac valve surgery.

INTERVENTIONS

Coagulation studies were performed at baseline, 30 seconds, 90 seconds, and 180 seconds after IV heparin administration. The tests included iSTAT (iACT) and Hemochron ACT (hACT), TEG R-Time, and anti-Xa levels. At the authors' institution, anti-Xa is the preferred measure of heparin anticoagulation when time permits. ACT, a rapid point- of-care test, is used to assess intraprocedural anticoagulation.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

After both low- and high-dose heparin, there are peak increases in ACT and anti-Xa at 30 seconds, followed by a decline at 90 seconds and plateau at 180 seconds. The TEG R-time remained elevated (>80 minutes) throughout. For TAVR cases, all anti-Xa was >1.5 IU/mL, and was associated with an iACT >180 seconds and an hACT >200 seconds. For cardiac valve surgery cases, all anti-Xa was >2.4 and associated with an iACT >420 seconds and and hACT >340 seconds. Compared with hACT, iACTs were significantly lower at all time points after low-dose heparin, but not after high-dose heparin.

CONCLUSIONS

In this pilot study, heparin anticoagulation was detected as early as 30 seconds after IV administration, based on ACT, anti-Xa levels, and TEG R-time.

The activated clotting time in cardiac surgery: should Celite or kaolin be used?

Objectives

Both kaolin- and Celite-activated clotting times (ACT) are used to guide anticoagulation during cardiopulmonary bypass. It is unknown whether these methods lead to similar management procedures for anticoagulation in patients and are thus interchangeable in terms of bias, precision and variability.

Methods

We randomized 97 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting or aortic valve replacement to either kaolin- or Celite-guided anticoagulation. The ACT was measured simultaneously with the other method. We administered 300 IU/kg heparin to obtain initial ACT values greater than 400 s and additional heparin in each group using the minimum value of duplicate measurements according to a predefined protocol. The primary end point was the total heparin dose and the number of heparin supplements.

Results

The total heparin dose per patient in the 48 Celite-guided patients was 35 271 ± 12 406 IU with 51 supplements and in the 49 kaolin-guided patients, 35 997 ± 11 540 IU ( P  = 0.77) with 56 supplements ( P  = 0.53). Postoperative thrombin generation time, fibrinolytic response time, chest tube loss and transfusion requirements were not different between the two groups. However, the methods differed in individual patients with regard to supplemental heparin ( P  = 0.002). Bias between methods at baseline was +10.3%, Celite being higher, and changed to a value of -12.9% at 2 h bypass. The coefficient of variation at baseline for individual patients was 2.6 times larger with kaolin than with Celite ( P  < 0.001). Correlation between ACT values at baseline was only 45%.

Conclusions

Kaolin- and Celite-guided management of anticoagulation is clinically not different, but the methods are not interchangeable.

Clinical registration number

www.trialregister.nl identifier 1738.

Antithrombotic therapy in cardiac surgery

PURPOSE

To review the perioperative management of antithrombotic therapy in cardiac surgery, including the management of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and off-pump surgery.

METHODS

A review of the relevant English literature over the period 1975-2005 was undertaken, in addition to a review of international practices in antithrombotic therapy in cardiac surgery.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

Cardiopulmonary bypass is required in most procedures and makes anticoagulation mandatory. Anticoagulation is, usually, achieved with unfractionnated heparin (UFH). Unfractionated heparin is monitored by point-of-care (POC) testing, such as the activated clotting time or the determination of heparin concentration. The target values of both tests remain empirical, with no clearly validated thresholds. The target value needs to be adjusted according to the POC test, given significant variations between devices and activators. After CABG, the need for antiplatelet therapy is well demonstrated, in order to limit the risk of postoperative death or ischemic events, and improve venous graft patency. Immediately after valvular surgery, antithrombotic therapy should take into account the specific risk carried by each patient and by each prosthetic device. The risk of venous thromboembolism, though poorly defined, is also present in the postoperative period and may require additional attention. Given the frequent exposure to UFH, occurrence of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia is not infrequent in these patients and requires careful individual management.

CONCLUSIONS

Antithrombotic therapy is an essential component of cardiac surgery. Yet, with the exception of antiplatelet agents in CABG patients, antithrombotic therapy is often based on the clinical experience of medical teams more than on an evidence-based assessment of the literature.

Comparison of the effects of aprotinin and tranexamic acid on blood loss and red blood cell transfusion requirements during the late stages of liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

During liver transplantation (LT), profound activation of the fibrinolytic system can contribute significantly to perioperative bleeding. Prophylactic administration of antifibrinolytic agents has been shown to reduce blood loss and the need for allogeneic transfusion in these conditions.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

This prospective randomized trial included 51 cirrhotic patients undergoing LT. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either 280 mg of aprotinin (AP) followed by 70 mg per hour or 40 mg per kg tranexamic acid (TA) followed by 40 mg per kg per hour, administered from the end of the anhepatic phase until 2 hours after reperfusion of the graft, and the effects on blood loss and red blood cell (RBC) transfusion requirements were compared. Transfusion policy was standardized in all patients. In addition, the biological effects of the two drugs, as assessed by coagulation and fibrinolytic markers obtained during surgery, were evaluated in a subgroup of patients from each treatment group and compared with an historical control group that did not receive antifibrinolytic drugs.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference between the two groups in perioperative blood losses (AP, 6200 [4620-8735] mL; TA, 5945 [4495-8527] mL; median [range]) or in RBC transfusions requirements (AP, 9 [6.75-15.25] units; TA, 10 [6.5-13.5] units). Inhibition of fibrinolysis was observed with both drugs compared with the control group. Coagulation appeared to be activated more with AP, however, whereas fibrinolysis was inhibited more by TA.

CONCLUSION

Blood losses and RBC transfusion requirements were comparable regardless of the drug administered. TA may be as valuable as AP for controlling fibrinolysis in LT.

Monitoring Activated Clotting Time for Combined Heparin and Aprotinin Application: An In Vitro Evaluation of a New Aprotinin-Insensitive Test Using SONOCLOT

The kaolin-based activated clotting time (ACT) is commonly used for monitoring heparin-induced anticoagulation alone and combined with aprotinin during cardiopulmonary bypass. However, aprotinin prolongs ACT measurements. Recently, a new so-called 'aprotinin-insensitive' ACT test (SaiACT) has been developed for the SONOCLOT analyzer. In this study we evaluated and compared this new test for the SONOCLOT analyzer in vitro with an established kaolin-based ACT from HEMOCHRON (HkACT). Twenty-five patients undergoing elective valve surgery donated 80 mL of blood after induction of anesthesia. The blood was withdrawn in citrated tubes and processed to analyze effects of heparin (0, 1, 2, and 3 U x mL(-1)), aprotinin (0, 200 kIU x mL(-1)), and 25% hemodilution with calcium-free lactated Ringer's solution on ACT measurements. A total of 400 blood samples were analyzed and ACT was measured in a wide, clinically relevant range in duplicate with SaiACT and HkACT. Addition of aprotinin to heparinized blood samples induced no significant changes of SaiACT measurements. By contrast, HkACT readings increased significantly: aprotinin prolonged HkACT in heparinized blood samples by 20% +/- 37% (2 U x mL(-1)) and 24% +/- 18% (3 U x mL(-1)), respectively, and in vitro hemodilution increased this effect.

IMPLICATIONS

Current standard techniques to measure heparin-induced anticoagulation during cardiopulmonary bypass are affected by aprotinin, a drug widely used in this setting. The aim of this study was to investigate in vitro a new, so-called 'aprotinin-insensitive' test from SONOCLOT to measure heparin-induced anticoagulation more reliably in combination with aprotinin.

Surveillance de l'anticoagulation des circulations extracorporelles par l'héparine non fractionnée : quels sont les problèmes non résolus ?

Cardiac surgery with extracorporeal circulation induces major alterations of haemostasis and requires high level of anticoagulation, usually achieved by unfractionated heparin infusion. Optimization of anticoagulant regimen, through adapted biological monitoring, can probably improve postoperative course, at least for postoperative haemostatic status. Despite increasing knowledge on extracorporeal circulation-induced haemostatic abnormalities and the development of new biological devices for heparin monitoring, the optimal level of anticoagulation remains matter of debate, as well as the monitoring procedures. This critical review presents the current available data on heparin anticoagulation and monitoring in this specific context, and underlines the pending issues about anticoagulation management during extracorporeal bypass.