Ruptured descending and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms

Thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysmectomy in the high-risk patient

OBJECTIVE

The study objective was to provide a review of outcomes and management strategies for high-risk scenarios in the open repair of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms.

METHODS

Series examining the open repair of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms were reviewed to identify well-described high-risk scenarios and summarize expected outcomes and management strategies in the current era.

RESULTS

The efforts of many have led to improved outcomes for patients undergoing the inherently challenging open repair of thoracoabdominal aortic pathologies. Several well-described high-risk scenarios include those related to preoperative comorbid conditions (preoperative pulmonary dysfunction, low ejection fraction, and renal dysfunction), anatomically high-risk cases (extent II repairs), and those with acute presentations (rupture, mycotic aneurysms, acute complicated type B aortic dissection). Several operative and perioperative techniques have been developed to mitigate the risk in these formidable cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Challenges remain for several high-risk scenarios in thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Judicious patient selection, meticulous surgical, and critical care strategies have greatly decreased the risk for many high-risk patients.

Contemporary outcomes of open repair of acute complicated type B aortic dissection

OBJECTIVE

Open repair of acute complicated type B aortic dissection (ACTBAD), required when endovascular repair is not possible, is historically considered high-risk. We analyze our experience with this high-risk cohort compared with the standard cohort.

METHODS

We identified consecutive patients undergoing descending thoracic or thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) repair from 1997 to 2021. Patients with ACTBAD were compared with those having surgery for other reasons. Logistic regression was used to identify associations with major adverse events (MAEs). Five-year survival and competing risk of reintervention were calculated.

RESULTS

Of 926 patients, 75 (8.1%) had ACTBAD. Indications included rupture (25/75), malperfusion (11/75), rapid expansion (26/75), recurrent pain (12/75), large aneurysm (5/75), and uncontrolled hypertension (1/75). The incidence of MAEs was similar (13.3% [10/75] vs 13.7% [117/851], P = .99). Operative mortality was 5.3% (4/75) vs 4.8% (41/851) (P = .99). Complications included tracheostomy (8%, 6/75), spinal cord ischemia (4%, 3/75), and new dialysis (2.7%, 2/75). Renal impairment, urgent/emergent operation, forced expiratory volume in 1 second ≤50%, and malperfusion were associated with MAEs, but not ACTBAD (odds ratio: 0.48, 95% confidence interval [CI]: [0.20-1.16], P = .1). At 5 and 10 years, there was no difference in survival (65.8% [95% CI: 54.6-79.2] vs 71.3% [95% CI: 67.9-74.9], P = .42, and 47.3% [95% CI: 34.5-64.7] vs 53.7% [95% CI: 49.3-58.4], P = .29, respectively) or 10-year reintervention (12.5% [95% CI: 4.3-25.3] vs 7.1% [95% CI: 4.7-10.1], P = .17, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

In an experienced center, open repair of ACTBAD can be performed with low rates of operative mortality and morbidity. Outcomes similar to elective repair are achievable even in high-risk patients with ACTBAD. In patients unsuitable for endovascular repair, transfer to a high-volume center experienced in open repair should be considered.

Emergency Endovascular Interventions on Descending Thoracic Aorta: A Single-Center Experience

Background

Implementation of emergency endovascular aortic repair provides an attractive opportunity in the treatment of complicated acute aortic syndromes involving descending aorta.

Aim

The aim of this study was to analyze the effectiveness of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for the treatment of acute surgical emergencies involving the descending thoracic aorta.

Methods

A retrospective review of the medical records of all patients undergoing TEVAR in a single center since 2007 was undertaken. Patients with the aortic disease treated on emergency inclusion criteria were complicated spontaneous acute aortic syndrome (csAAS), traumatic aortic acute injuries (TAIs), and other indications requiring emergent intervention. Technical and clinical success with patient mortality, survival, and reoperation rate was evaluated according to Society for Vascular Surgery reporting standards for thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR).

Results

The emergency interventions were necessary in 74 cases (51.0%), including patients with the complicated spontaneous acute aortic syndrome (csAAS) (64.8%; n = 48) and traumatic aortic acute injuries (TAIs) (31.1%). In addition, in one case aortic iatrogenic dissection (AID) and in 2 other fistulas after the previous stent graft, implantations were diagnosed. All procedures were done through surgically exposed femoral arteries while 2 hybrid procedures required additional approaches. The primary technical success rate was 95.9%, in 3 cases endoleak was reported. The primary clinical success occurred in 94.5%. All patients survived the endovascular interventions, whereas during in-hospital stay one of them died due to multiorgan failure (early mortality 1.3%). During the follow-up period, lasting 6 through 164 months (median 67), 11 patients died. Annual, five- and ten-year probability of survival was 86.4 ± 0.04%, 80.0 ± 0.05%, and 76.6 ± 0.06%, respectively. However, the rate of 5-year survivors was significantly higher after TAI (95.2%) than scAAS (63.4%) (p=0.008). Early after the procedure, one individual developed transient paraparesis (1.3%). No other serious stent-graft-related adverse events were noted within the postdischarge follow-up period.

Conclusions

Descending aortic pathologies requiring emergent interventions can be treated by endovascular techniques with optimal results and low morbidity and mortality in an experienced and dedicated team.

Impact of left ventricular ejection fraction on the outcomes of open repair of descending thoracic and thoracoabdominal aneurysms

OBJECTIVE

To discern the impact of depressed left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) on the outcomes of open descending thoracic aneurysm (DTA) and thoracoabdominal aneurysms (TAAA) repair.

METHODS

Restricted cubic spline analysis was used to identify a threshold of LVEF, which corresponded to an increase in operative mortality and major adverse events (MAE: operative death, myocardial infarction, stroke, spinal cord injury, need for tracheostomy or dialysis). Logistic and Cox regression were performed to identify independent predictors of MAE, operative mortality, and survival.

RESULTS

DTA/TAAA repair was performed in 833 patients between 1997 and 2018. Restricted cubic spline analysis showed that patients with LVEF <40% (n = 66) had an increased risk of MAE (odds ratio [OR], 2.17; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.22-3.87; P < .01) and operative mortality (OR, 2.72; 95% CI, 1.21-6.12; P = .02) compared with the group with LVEF ≥40% (n = 767). The group with LVEF <40% had a worse preoperative profile (eg, coronary revascularization, 48.5% vs 17.3% [P < .01]; valvular disease, 82.8% vs 49.39% [P < .01]; renal insufficiency, 45.5% vs 26.1% [P < .01]; respiratory insufficiency, 36.4% vs 21.2% [P = .01]) and worse long-term survival (35.5% vs 44.7% at 10 years; P = .01). Nonetheless, on multivariate regression, depressed LVEF was not an independent predictor of operative mortality, MAE, or survival.

CONCLUSIONS

LVEF is not an independent predictor of adverse events in surgery for DTA.

Surgery for chronic type B dissection with aneurysmal degeneration

Purpose

Open repair of descending thoracic or thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) continues to carry a not insignificant operative risk, even in experienced hands. Over the past three decades, there has been considerable improvement in both the mortality and morbidity associated with these procedures. Herein, we describe our operative results and long-term outcomes in patients with chronic type B aortic dissections.

Methods

Review of the aortic surgical database was conducted to identify all consecutive patients who underwent repair of TAAA for chronic type B dissection from May 1997 to March 2018. The primary end point was operative mortality with secondary end points as the composite of major adverse events as well as each of the individual complications.

Results

One hundred and fifty-three patients met inclusion criteria with 54.9% (84/153) having surgery on an elective basis. The mean age was 58.9 years with a majority of male gender-107/153 (69.9%). Eighty-three (54.2%) of the TAAA were extent I, while 36 (23.5%) were extent II and 34 (22.3%) extent III-IV. Operative mortality was 8.5% (13/153) with eight of the deaths in patients who presented with extent II TAAA. On Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, 87.5% (95% confidence interval (CI) 77.9-97.1%) of the elective cohort were alive after 5 years while only 69.9% (CI 55.2-84.6%) of those in need of urgent/emergency intervention survived (p = .039).

Conclusions

In a majority of patients with chronic type B dissections, reproducibly, excellent outcomes can be achieved with relatively low risk of mortality. In the higher risk subsets of patients with extent II TAAA, careful consideration and discussion of expected outcomes will help inform the decision-making process.

The impact of endovascular repair on management and outcome of ruptured thoracic aortic aneurysms

BACKGROUND

Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) has become an alternative to open repair for the treatment of ruptured thoracic aortic aneurysms (rTAAs). The aim of this study was to assess national trends in the use of TEVAR for the treatment of rTAA and to determine its impact on perioperative outcomes.

METHODS

Patients admitted with an rTAA between 1993 and 2012 were identified from the National Inpatient Sample. Patients were grouped in accordance with their treatment: TEVAR, open repair, or nonoperative treatment. The primary outcomes were treatment trends over time and in-hospital death. Secondary outcomes included perioperative complications and length of stay. Trend analyses were performed using the Cochran-Armitage test for trend, and adjusted mortality risks were established using multivariable logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 12,399 patients were included, with 1622 (13%) undergoing TEVAR, 2808 (23%) undergoing open repair, and 7969 (64%) not undergoing surgical treatment. TEVAR has been increasingly used from 2% of total admissions in 2003-2004 to 43% in 2011-2012 (P < .001). Concurrently, there was a decline in the proportion of patients undergoing open repair (29% to 12%; P < .001) and nonoperative treatment (69% to 45%; P < .001). The proportion of patients undergoing surgical repair has increased for all age groups since 1993-1994 (P < .001 for all) but was most pronounced among those aged 80 years with a 7.5-fold increase. After TEVAR was introduced, procedural mortality decreased from 36% in 2003-2004 to 27% in 2011-2012 (P < .001); mortality among those undergoing nonoperative treatment remained stable between 63% and 60% (P = .167). Overall mortality after rTAA admission decreased from 55% to 42% (P < .001). Since 2005, mortality for open repair was 33% and 22% for TEVAR (P < .001). In adjusted analysis, open repair was associated with a twofold higher mortality than TEVAR (odds ratio, 2.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.7-2.5).

CONCLUSIONS

TEVAR has replaced open repair as primary surgical treatment for rTAA. The introduction of endovascular treatment appears to have broadened the eligibility of patients for surgical treatment, particularly among the elderly. Mortality after rTAA admission has declined since the introduction of TEVAR, which is the result of improved operative mortality as well as the increased proportion of patients undergoing surgical repair.

Early Experiences with the Endovascular Repair of Ruptured Descending Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to report our early experiences with the endovascular repair of ruptured descending thoracic aortic aneurysms (rDTAAs), which are a rare and life-threatening condition.

METHODS

Among 42 patients who underwent thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) between October 2010 and September 2015, five patients (11.9%) suffered an rDTAA.

RESULTS

The mean age was 72.4±5.1 years, and all patients were male. Hemoptysis and hemothorax were present in three (60%) and two (40%) patients, respectively. Hypovolemic shock was noted in three patients who underwent emergency operations. A hybrid operation was performed in three patients. The mean operative time was 269.8±72.3 minutes. The mean total length of aortic coverage was 186.0±49.2 mm. No 30-day mortality occurred. Stroke, delirium, and atrial fibrillation were observed in one patient each. Paraplegia did not occur. Endoleak was found in two patients (40%), one of whom underwent an early and successful reintervention. During the mean follow-up period of 16.8±14.8 months, two patients died; one cause of death was a persistent type 1 endoleak and the other cause was unknown.

CONCLUSION

TEVAR for rDTAA was associated with favorable early mortality and morbidity outcomes. However, early reintervention should be considered if persistent endoleak occurs.

Outcomes of Open Repair of Mycotic Descending Thoracic and Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysms

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the short- and intermediate-term outcomes of open repair of mycotic thoracic and thoracoabdominal aneurysms. Contemporary surgical and perioperative techniques were utilized.

METHODS

From November 1997 to May 2014, 14 consecutive patients underwent open repair of descending thoracic (n = 9, 64.3%) and thoracoabdominal (n = 5, 35.7%) mycotic aortic aneurysms. All procedures were performed through the left side of the chest. Infected tissue was completely debrided and excised. Aortic continuity was restored in situ with a Dacron prosthesis (Macquet Corp, Oakland, NJ). Soft tissue coverage of the prosthesis was performed when anatomy and patient condition permitted. Perioperative outcomes, intermediate-term survival, and reinfection rates were examined.

RESULTS

All patients presented with either aneurysm-related symptoms or a clinical picture of sepsis. Diagnosis was confirmed utilizing computed tomography imaging. Mean age was 66 ± 13 years, 8 patients (57.1%) were male, and mean aneurysm size was 5.9 ± 1.3 cm. All patients were hypertensive, 3 (21.4%) had prior coronary revascularization, 7 (50%) had chronic pulmonary disease, 5 (35.7%) had diabetes mellitus, and 2 (14.3%) had end-stage renal disease requiring dialysis. Twelve patients (85.7%) had aneurysm-related pain, and 9 (64.3%) of them had contained rupture. Mean time from onset of illness to surgery was 36 days (range, 0 to 153). On preoperative blood cultures, 4 (28.6%) grew Staphylococcus aureus, 4 (28.6%) grew gram negative organisms, 2 (14.3%) grew mycobacterium, and 4 cultures (28.6%) had negative results. Empiric broad-spectrum antibiotics were initiated on all patients and adjusted based on final cultures. A majority of patients underwent repair utilizing a clamp-and-sew technique (n = 10, 71.4%); the remainder (n = 4, 28.6%) required repair under profound hypothermic circulatory arrest. After radical debridement of the infected tissue, grafts were placed in the normal anatomic position; 6 (42.9%) patients had additional soft tissue coverage, 5 (35.7%) utilizing an omental flap and 1 (7.1%), a serratus muscle flap. There was 1 in-hospital death (7.1%) secondary to ischemic bowel. Four patients (28.6%) required tracheostomy, and 1 (7.1%) had recurrent nerve injury. None of the patients incurred spinal cord injury, stroke, or new onset renal failure requiring dialysis. After surgery, all patients were given 6 weeks of intravenous antibiotics. Lifelong suppression therapy was maintained with oral antibiotics. There were no episodes of prosthetic graft infection on follow-up. Univariate analysis revealed that New York Heart Association functional class, diabetes, and preoperative renal dysfunction were preoperative risk factors for major adverse events. Mean follow-up time was 26.5 months (median 8.2; range, 1 to 142). Actuarial 5-year survival was 71%.

CONCLUSIONS

Open repair of mycotic descending thoracic and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms remains the gold standard of therapy. Aggressive intraoperative debridement with in situ prosthetic reconstruction permits a high rate of success in this very high risk cohort of patients. Lifelong antibiotic suppression therapy may prevent late prosthetic graft infection.

Emergency procedures on the descending thoracic aorta in the endovascular era

BACKGROUND

Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR), initially developed for the treatment of degenerative aneurysms of the descending thoracic aorta, has been applied to the entire spectrum of descending thoracic aortic pathology in both the elective and emergent settings. This single center study evaluates the effectiveness of TEVAR for the treatment of acute surgical emergencies involving the descending thoracic aorta, including traumatic aortic disruption (TAD), ruptured descending thoracic aneurysm (RDTA), and acute complicated Type B dissection (cTBD).

METHODS

A retrospective review of the medical records of all patients undergoing emergent TEVAR at the University of Mississippi Medical Center between August 2007 and November 2010 was undertaken. Patients were studied for 30-day survival, complications, type of device used for the repair, and technical aspects of the procedure.

RESULTS

A total of 44 patients (59% male) with an average age of 49 years (range, 16-87 years) underwent emergent TEVAR during the study period. The technical success rate was 100%, with no patient requiring emergent open surgery for conditions involving the descending thoracic aorta at our institution during the study period. The majority (73%) of the repairs were accomplished using commercially available thoracic stent grafts. Abdominal endograft proximal extension cuffs were used in 12 (38%) of the 32 patients undergoing repair of TAD. Twenty-one patients (48%) required coverage of the left subclavian artery, two (10%) of whom subsequently required subclavian artery revascularization. Procedure-related complications included two strokes, one spinal cord ischemia, one unintentional coverage of the left carotid artery, one episode of acute renal failure, and three access site injuries. One patient undergoing repair of TAD had collapse of the stent graft in the early postoperative period. He was successfully treated by placement of an additional stent graft. Seven patients (16%) died within 30 days of surgery. Three of the deaths occurred in patients who had successfully undergone repair of a TAD and died of associated injuries.

CONCLUSIONS

Emergent TEVAR has become the treatment of choice for acute surgical emergencies involving the descending thoracic aorta. Short-term morbidity and mortality compare favorably with historic results for emergent open surgical procedures on the descending thoracic aorta. Survival is highest in patients undergoing repair of TAD. Using current endograft technology, nearly all emergent conditions of the descending thoracic aorta can be successfully treated with TEVAR.

Outcomes of Endovascular Repair of Ruptured Descending Thoracic Aortic Aneurysms

Background— Thoracic endovascular aortic repair offers a less invasive approach for the treatment of ruptured descending thoracic aortic aneurysms (rDTAA). Due to the low incidence of this life-threatening condition, little is known about the outcomes of endovascular repair of rDTAA and the factors that affect these outcomes.

Methods and Results— We retrospectively investigated the outcomes of 87 patients who underwent thoracic endovascular aortic repair for rDTAA at 7 referral centers between 2002 and 2009. The mean age was 69.8±12 years and 69.0% of the patients were men. Hypovolemic shock was present in 21.8% of patients, and 40.2% were hemodynamically unstable. The 30-day mortality rate was 18.4%, and hypovolemic shock (odds ratio 4.75; 95% confidence interval, 1.37 to 16.5; P =0.014) and hemothorax at admission (odds ratio 6.65; 95% confidence interval, 1.64 to 27.1; P =0.008) were associated with increased 30-day mortality after adjusting for age. Stroke and paraplegia occurred each in 8.0%, and endoleak was diagnosed in 18.4% of patients within the first 30 days after thoracic endovascular aortic repair. Four additional patients died as a result of procedure-related complications during a median follow-up of 13 months; the estimated aneurysm-related mortality at 4 years was 25.4%.

Conclusion— Endovascular repair of rDTAA is associated with encouraging results. The endovascular approach was associated with considerable rates of neurological complications and procedure-related complications such as endoleak.

Aortic endograft sizing in trauma patients with hemodynamic instability

OBJECTIVES

To investigate changes in aortic diameter in hemodynamically unstable trauma patients and the implications for sizing of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) in patients with traumatic thoracic aortic injury (TTAI).

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated all trauma patients that were admitted with hemodynamic instability (mean arterial pressure <95 mm Hg and a pulse >or=100 beats/min) and underwent computed tomography (CT) of the thorax and abdomen both at admission and at another moment (control CT scan), at the Yale New Haven Hospital between 2002 and 2009. The CT examinations were reviewed in a blinded fashion and the aortic diameter was measured at six different levels by a cardiovascular radiologist. Differences in aortic diameter between the initial CTs obtained in the trauma bay and the control CTs were compared using the paired Student t test.

RESULTS

Forty-three patients were identified, including 32 males. Mean age was 37 +/- 16 years, mean injury severity score was 26 +/- 15, the mean pulse and blood pressure were 122 beats/min and 103/63 mm Hg, respectively. Overall, the mean aortic diameter was significantly larger at the control CT examinations compared with the initial CT examinations while hemodynamically unstable, at all evaluated levels. Among patients with a pulse >or=130/min, the mean increase in aortic diameter was most consistent at the level of the mid descending thoracic aorta (DTA, +12.6%, P = .003) and at the level of the infrarenal aorta (+12.6%, P = .004).

CONCLUSIONS

The aortic diameter decreases dramatically in trauma patients with hemodynamic instability. This decrease in aortic diameter could theoretically lead to inaccurate aortic measurements and undersizing of the endograft in hemodynamically unstable TTAI patients requiring TEVAR. Further research is needed to better predict the actual aortic diameters in individual hemodynamically unstable patients requiring endovascular aortic repair.

A comparative analysis of open and endovascular repair for the ruptured descending thoracic aorta

BACKGROUND

Successful repair of the ruptured (non-traumatic) descending thoracic aorta (rTA) remains a formidable clinical challenge. Although effective for rTA, traditional open repair (DTAR) has significant associated morbidity. With expanding indications for thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR), we describe our experience with TEVAR and DTAR in this high-risk setting to elucidate their evolving roles.

METHODS

Since the inception of our thoracic aortic endovascular program in 1993, 69 patients underwent DTAR (34) or TEVAR (35) for rTA. Patients underwent TEVAR if they were considered nonoperative candidates because of extensive comorbidities (n = 31; 88.6%) or had extremely favorable anatomy for endovascular repair (eg, mid-descending saccular aneurysm, n = 4). Aortic pathology causing rupture was fusiform aneurysm (18), saccular aneurysm/ulcer (22), and dissection (29). Associated aortobronchial fistulae (12) and aortoesophageal (1) fistulae were also present in 18.8%. Arch repair was needed in 46; total descending repair was needed in 33. Follow-up was 100% complete (mean 37.4 months).

RESULTS

Mean age was 65.9 years (DTAR 60.3 year vs TEVAR 71.3 years, P = .005). In-hospital or 30-day mortality was seen in 13 patients (TEVAR n = 4; 11.4% vs DTAR n = 9; 26.5%, P = .13). Median length of stay was shorter after TEVAR (8 days vs DTAR 15 days, P = .02). Mean Kaplan-Meier survival was similar between groups (TEVAR 67.4 months vs DTAR 65.0 months, P = .7). By multivariate analysis, independent predictors of a composite outcome of early mortality, stroke, permanent spinal cord ischemia, or need for dialysis or tracheostomy included the presentation with hemodynamic instability (P < .001) and treatment with conventional open repair (P = .02).

CONCLUSION

An endovascular approach for the ruptured (non-traumatic) descending thoracic aorta reduces early morbidity, mortality, and duration of hospitalization, while providing equivalent late outcomes even in an older group largely considered high risk for open repair. These data support a paradigm shift, with TEVAR emerging as the preferred therapy for all patients presenting with descending aortic rupture.

Should Patients With Contained Rupture of a Descending Aortic Aneurysm Only Receive Unilateral Artificial Ventilation? Case Report of a Death During an Operation

The danger of thoracic aneurysm rupture increases with the size of the aneurysm. We report on a 59-year-old man who developed a secondary aneurysm of the descending thoracic aorta within the residual type A dissection that was approximately 9-cm long and in which a contained rupture occurred. The patient died as a result of a massive hemorrhage during the anesthesiological preparation for emergency operation a short time after double-lumen intubation and commencement of controlled artificial ventilation. Autopsy revealed an atelectatic lower pulmonary lobe that had partially fused with the aneurysm. The fusion may have been so substantial that it may have acutely eliminated the covering of the contained rupture during artificial ventilation.

Contemporary results of open repair of ruptured descending thoracic and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the results of open repair for ruptured descending thoracic and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (RDTAA).

METHODS

A retrospective review identified 41 consecutive cases of open surgical repair in 40 patients presenting with nontraumatic, atherosclerotic RDTAA from 1996 to 2006. Patients with traumatic injuries or complicated dissections were excluded. Patient characteristics and preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative variables were collected from the medical record. Univariate and logistic regression were used to identify factors contributing to mortality and morbidity in these patients.

RESULTS

The operative mortality rate was 26.8% (11/41). All but two deaths occurred within 24 hours of operation; seven were intraoperative. Overall actuarial survival rates at 1 and 2 years were 53.7% and 47.1%, respectively. For those who survived to hospital discharge, the respective numbers were 73.3% and 64.4%. Intraoperative hypotension and blood transfusion requirements were independent predictors of perioperative death. Octogenarians had a mortality rate equivalent to that of the younger population (25% vs 27.6%; not significant). There was a strong trend toward an improved outcome in the latter part (2003-2006) compared with the first part (1995-2002; 13.6% vs 42.1%, respectively; P = .075).

CONCLUSIONS

Direct open repair for RDTAA can be achieved with acceptable mortality and morbidity rates even in elderly patients. Improved outcome can be expected with increased volume and experience. This series should help establish a reference against which the results of endovascular endeavors and hybrid procedures could be compared.

Endovascular Repair of Ruptured Saccular Aneurysms of the Descending Thoracic Aorta

Open repair of ruptured aneurysms of the descending thoracic aorta (DTA) is associated with early mortality rates of 20%-60% and severe morbidity rates exceeding 40%. The present report describes three octogenarian patients and one sexagenarian patient at poor surgical risk admitted with acutely ruptured saccular DTA aneurysms (two of four were anastomotic) unrelated to trauma or infection who underwent successful endovascular therapy, which involved the use of aortic endovascular cuffs in three cases. Mean intensive care unit and total hospital stay durations were 1.75 days (range, 1-4 d) and 6 days (range, 3-13 d), respectively. At 30 days, all patients were alive and free of repeat intervention, with aneurysm exclusion achieved in all cases but one, which featured a marginal type II endoleak. These data support endovascular therapy for ruptured saccular DTA aneurysms enabling short-term outcomes that otherwise would have been unrealistic.

Early outcomes after elective and emergent endovascular repair of the thoracic aorta

BACKGROUND

Endovascular treatment of thoracic aortic pathology has emerged as a viable alternative to open surgical repair in both the elective and emergent settings. The aim of this study was to evaluate preoperative work-up, intra-operative strategy, and outcomes of endovascular stent-grafting of the thoracic aorta in patients undergoing elective repair and those undergoing emergent repair.

METHODS

All patient information was obtained by a retrospective review of an established clinical database for all endovascular thoracic stent-graft cases. From October 1999 to August 2005, 70 patients were treated with endovascular stent-grafts for lesions of the thoracic aorta. Thirty-five patients had an elective endovascular procedure, and 35 patients had an emergent procedure.

RESULTS

Thirty-five patients in the endovascular (EL) group were treated for aneurysm (n = 34) and type B dissection (n = 1). Thirty-five patients in the emergent (EM) group were treated for aneurysm (n = 10), intramural hematoma (n = 10), type B dissection (n = 7), traumatic rupture (n = 7), and aortoesophageal fistula (n = 1). Preoperative angiography was performed in 94.3% (33/35) of EL patients but in only 45.7% (16/35) EM patients (P < .005). The EM procedures had significantly shorter operative times, used lower contrast volumes, used fewer stent-graft components (mode 2, range 1 to 5 vs mode 1, range 1 to 3; P = .02), and spinal cerebrospinal fluid drains were used significantly less often (82.9% vs 57.1%, P = .04). Both groups had similar 30-day morbidity, mortality (0/35 EL vs 1/35 [2.9%] EM, P = .99), postoperative endoleak (9/35 [25.7%] EL vs 7/35 [20.0%] EM, P = .78), endovascular failure (3/35 [8.6%] EL vs 5/35 [14.3%] EM, P = .71), and patient survival.

CONCLUSION

There are significant differences in the underlying pathology, preoperative evaluation, and operative course between elective and emergency treatment endovascular procedures for lesions of the thoracic aorta. Endovascular repair of thoracic aortic lesions can be accomplished with low perioperative mortality and morbidity rates, as well as acceptable endoleak and endovascular failure rates for both elective and emergency procedures.

Aneurismas toracoabdominais rotos

OBJETIVO: Avaliar os dados pré, intra e pós-operatórios dos aneurismas toracoabdominais rotos operados no Hospital de Clínicas da Universidade Estadual de Campinas. MÉTODOS: Estudo retrospectivo de cinco pacientes submetidos à correção de aneurisma toracoabdominal roto no Hospital de Clínicas da Universidade Estadual de Campinas, entre setembro de 2000 e abril de 2004. Todos os pacientes apresentavam aneurisma toracoabdominal tipo IV roto, sendo que quatro estavam estáveis hemodinamicamente. Três pacientes foram operados com o simples pinçamento da aorta supracelíaca e infusão de soro fisiológico a 4 ºC nas artérias renais; um paciente evoluiu para óbito no intra-operatório antes da abertura do aneurisma; e um paciente foi operado utilizando-se perfusão de sangue oxigenado nas artérias viscerais. RESULTADOS: Dos cinco pacientes operados, dois foram a óbito (40%). Um deles apresentava instabilidade hemodinâmica e faleceu no intra-operatório; o outro faleceu no 26º dia pós-operatório com insuficiência de múltiplos órgãos. Todos os três sobreviventes evoluíram bem, sem seqüelas. Entre os pacientes que chegaram ao centro cirúrgico estáveis hemodinamicamente, a mortalidade foi de 25%. CONCLUSÕES: Pacientes com aneurisma toracoabdominal tipo IV roto, com estabilidade hemodinâmica, alcançam resultados cirúrgicos satisfatórios, semelhantes aos aneurismas rotos infra-renais.

Endovascular repair of lesions involving the descending thoracic aorta

BACKGROUND

Vascular lesions involving the thoracic aorta are often life-threatening conditions that carry significant morbidity and mortality with traditional open surgical repair. Preliminary results suggest that endovascular therapy is an effective and possibly advantageous treatment for diseases of the descending thoracic aorta.

METHODS

Between October 2000 and May 2004, 50 consecutive patients underwent endovascular stent-grafting of lesions involving the descending thoracic aorta. Attempted stent-graft deployment was performed electively in 39 patients and emergently in 11. The pathology of electively treated aortic lesions included degenerative/atherosclerotic aneurysms (n = 24), pseudoaneurysms (n = 11), aortic dissections (n = 2), and penetrating ulcers (n = 2). Emergently treated aortic lesions were for acute rupture due to infectious (mycotic) aneurysms (n = 4), atherosclerotic/degenerative aneurysms (n = 3), acute type B dissections (n = 2), and acute transections (n = 2). Devices used include Talent (n = 45), AneuRx aortic cuffs (n = 2), custom-fabricated Gianturco-Dacron grafts (n = 2), and a modified Cook-Zenith abdominal aortic graft (n = 1). Follow-up was performed at 1-month, 6-months, 1-year, and annually thereafter.

RESULTS

Primary technical success, defined as successful deployment and exclusion of the lesion without evidence of type I or type III endoleak, was achieved in 48 (96%) of 50 patients. In one patient, the procedure was terminated due to inability to access the iliac vessels. In another patient, a type III endoleak was observed at the completion of the primary procedure that required deployment of an additional stent-graft component 2 months later. Of the 49 patients who received endografts, seven underwent secondary procedures to correct endoleaks, with five of these seven requiring the deployment of additional endovascular stent-graft components. Major complications included four in-hospital deaths, with three of these occurring in patients treated emergently. Additionally, respiratory failure (n = 6), multisystem organ failure (n = 2), cerebrovascular accident (n = 2), retroperitoneal hematoma (n = 2), acute renal insufficiency (n = 1), and pulmonary embolus (n = 1) were also observed. The overall endoleak rate was 20%, with five primary (< or = 30 days) and five secondary (> 30 days) endoleaks observed. Five of the endoleaks were treated with the deployment of one or more additional endovascular stent-graft components. Two of the endoleaks were treated with endovascular balloon remolding. Mean follow-up was 271 days. There were no aneurysm ruptures or aneurysm-related deaths.

CONCLUSIONS

Endovascular treatment of vascular lesions involving the descending thoracic aorta can be safely performed with low morbidity in high-risk patients. Endovascular repair may become an attractive alternative for the treatment of a wide range of pathology along this vascular territory.

Does Cross-Clamping the Arch Increase the Risk of Descending Thoracic and Thoracoabdominal Aneurysm Repair?

BACKGROUND

Descending thoracic and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms may arise in the distal aortic arch. Repair of these aneurysms has been associated with increased morbidity and operative mortality. Complex surgical and endovascular techniques have reduced the risks for this cohort. We examined outcomes utilizing an approach based on simple cross-clamping of the arch.

METHODS

From July 1997 to January 2004, 272 consecutive patients had aneurysm repair through the left chest. Twenty-nine requiring profound hypothermic circulatory arrest (PHCA) were excluded. Two hundred and forty-three were divided into two groups: group I (n = 60) had distal arch involvement and required cross-clamping proximal to the left subclavian artery. Group II (n = 183) were cross-clamped distal to the subclavian. Adjuncts for neurologic and renal protection were utilized as needed.

RESULTS

In-hospital mortality for all 243 patients was 3.7%. There was no difference in mortality between groups (I, 3.3% vs II, 3.8%). Group I patients also had similar rates of paraplegia (I, 0% vs II, 2.2%), stroke (I, 1.2% vs II ,1.1%), and renal failure (I, 1.7% vs II, 5.5%). Group I patients had significantly more recurrent nerve palsies (I, 33% vs II, 4.9%) although this did not translate into a higher incidence of respiratory failure.

CONCLUSIONS

Repair of thoracic aneurysms arising in the distal arch can be repaired with a technique based on simple cross-clamping without an increase in mortality or major neurologic injury. Recurrent nerve palsy is much more common with this approach but is well-tolerated without increasing the need for tracheostomy.

Descending Thoracic Aortic Rupture: Role of Endovascular Stent-Grafting

BACKGROUND

The mortality of patients with descending thoracic aortic rupture who are treated by conventional surgery is high. Our current strategy for the management of descending thoracic aortic rupture is to treat seriously ill patients with endovascular stent-grafting using handmade grafts, and to treat other patients with traditional open repair. The aim of this study was to assess the early results of our strategy.

METHODS

Twenty-nine consecutive patients with descending thoracic aortic rupture were referred to Sapporo Medical University Hospital from June 2001 to January 2004. Eighteen of these 29 patients were selected for endovascular stent-grafting because of polytrauma (n = 7), comorbidities (n = 6), advanced age (n = 2), past history of left thoracotomy (n = 2), and patient's preference (n = 1). The remaining 11 patients underwent traditional graft replacement of the diseased aorta. Their outcomes and follow-up data were collected and analyzed retrospectively.

RESULTS

The in-hospital mortality rate was 14% (4/29). The mortality rate for surgical patients and stent-grafting patients was 9% (1/11) and 17% (3/18), respectively. The survival rate of patients at 2 years was 63% +/- 10%. In the follow-up period, 2 of the 18 patients who underwent endovascular stent-grafting required open repair, and 1 patient underwent a redo endovascular stent-grafting procedure because of stent failure. One of these 3 patients died of an intraoperative retrograde type A aortic dissection.

CONCLUSIONS

The early results of endovascular stent-grafting for the treatment of high-risk patients with descending thoracic aortic rupture are promising. Early results of open repair can also be improved by the selection of stabilized patients. However, the requirement of reintervention indicates that detailed follow-up examinations in patients who have undergone endovascular stent-grafting with handmade stent-grafts should be performed.

A Strategy for Treatment of Type III and IV Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysm

The aim of this study was to describe the results of resection and graft replacement for type III and IV thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair. In this retrospective study, 27 patients underwent resection and graft replacement for type III (10) or type IV (17) thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms. Nine patients had rupture, 12 were symptomatic, and 6 were operated on electively. The "clamp-and-sew" technique was applied in six cases. In 12 patients with type IV aneurysm the proximal part of the vascular graft was beveled, including the orifices of the celiac, superior mesenteric, and one or both renal arteries in the proximal anastomosis. Finally, eight patients underwent surgical application of a shunt for perfusion of the celiac and superior mesenteric arteries. One patient was treated with a combination of open and endovascular surgery. There were four early deaths (14.8%), all following operations for rupture, which represents a 45% mortality rate in this subgroup of patients. Two patients with type III aneurysm had postoperative paraparesis. One was symptomatic whereas the other was operated on electively. Excluding the patients with rupture, the accumulated 5-year survival rate was 65%. These results indicate that direct cross-clamping of the aorta gives limited time for performing the necessary anastomoses without inducing mesenteric ischemia. Inclusion of the orifices of the visceral arteries in the upper anastomosis is a feasible method during surgery for type IV aneurysms. Finally, shunting of the celiac and the superior mesenteric arteries seems to be useful, especially during surgery for type III aneurysms.

Preoperative assessment and management to prevent complications during high-risk vascular surgery

OBJECTIVE

Most patients requiring vascular surgical reconstruction are at high risk for major morbidity and mortality, with certain vascular procedures at particularly high risk for complications. Although numerous comorbid conditions are precisely the risk factors that determine outcome, we review particular factors for each surgery that may be optimized to alter outcome and minimize postoperative complications.

DESIGN

Literature review.

RESULTS

Certain aspects of care are common to all vascular surgery procedures, including thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair, pararenal and ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, mesenteric and renal revascularization, and carotid endarterectomy. Some factors that are important include careful preoperative assessment and optimization of cardiac, pulmonary, and renal function and volume status. In addition, the use of experienced teams during and after the procedure, as well as clear and continuous communication between all surgical team members, may improve outcome. Particular attention to procedural details is also crucial to achieving excellent results.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients needing vascular surgery often possess management challenges that increase the risk of perioperative complications. Meticulous attention to details during all phases of care, including preoperative optimization as well as intraoperative procedural conduct and communication, helps achieve optimal results and thus minimize the risk of complications.